ML20015A451

Report No. R1432-01, Acoustical Analysis of ISP Cisf

ML20015A451
Person / Time
Site:	Consolidated Interim Storage Facility
Issue date:	08/22/2019
From:	David Nelson Nelson Acoustics
To:	Glaser J Cook-Joyce, Consolidated Interim Storage Facility, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML20015A448	List: ML20015A449 ML20015A450 ML20015A451 ML20015A452 ML20015A453 ML20015A454
References
CAC 001028, E-55737, EPID L-2017-NEW-002 R1432-01
Download: ML20015A451 (34)

Text

~nacoust1cs NELSON ACOUSTICS POST OFFICE BOX 879, ELGIN, TX 78621 VOICE: +1.512.281.5535 E-MAIL: david@nelsonacoustical.com product noise R&D

• sound quality

• noise and vibration control

• test facility design

• seminars Report No. R1432-01: Acoustical analysis ofISP CISF NRC Requests for Additional Information RAI-01: Background noise assessment RAI-02: Noise levels at receptors during construction and operation RAI-03: Personnel noise exposure during construction and operation 2019 August 22 Jeff Glaser, PE Cook-Joyce Inc.

812 W. 11th Street Austin TX 78701

Dear Jeff,

REPORT

SUMMARY

The following report conveys the results of acoustical analyses related to construction and operation of Interim Storage Partners' Consolidated Interim Storage Facility as requested by NRC. The intent of the analyses is to project the sound levels associated with each phase of activity at nearby receptors and for onsite personnel, to compare them with objective criteria (e.g., HUD, EPA, OSHA), and to recommend noise control measures as necessary.

Tables 1 - 3 summarize the ambient sound level at nine nearby receptors ("Noise Sensitive Areas"), along with CISF contributions during initial construction, operation, and later phases of construction.

Table 1: Estimated noise impact at NSA's during Phase 1 Construction Approx. Distance and Estimated Est'd ISP CISF Ph. 1 Est'd Total Ldn during EPA d d NSA Type Direction relative to ISP Ambient Ldn Construction Ldn Recommen e CISF Construction Ldn 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 47.9 43.2 49.1 70 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 42.6 48.4 49.4 70 3

Boundary 4000ft. WNW 41.6 48.6 49.4 70 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 39.1 69.9 69.9 (Onsite) 5 LSA Pad NE Corner 39.8 60.0 60.1 (Onsite) 6 Residential 3.9 mi. WSW 64.5 30.2 64.5 55 7

Residential 4.1 mi. WSW 58.9 29.6 58.9 55 8

Residential 5.3 mi. WSW 47.0 27.1 47.0 55 9

Residential 4.9 mi. WSW 55.5 27.9 55.5 55 Page I of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table 2: Estimated noise impact at NSA's during Operation Approx. Distance and Ambient Ldn Est'd Sound Level Est'd "Total" Ldn (ISP EPA NSA Type Direction relative to ISP (via Meas'd Ld (Ldn) of ISP CISF CISF + Ambient Recommended CISF

& Est'd Ln) during Operation noise)

Ldn 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 47.9 41.4 48.7 70 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 42.6 39.9 44.5 70 3

Boundary 4000ft. WNW 41.6 39.1 43.5 70 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 39.1 58.4 58.5 (Onsite) 5 LSA Pad NE Corner 39.8 55.1 55.3 (Onsite) 6 Residentia I 3.9 mi. WSW 64.5 33.3 64.5 55 7

Residentia I 4.1 mi. WSW 58.9 28.8 58.9 55 8

Residentia I 5.3 mi. WSW 47.0 34.5 47.2 55 9

Residentia I 4.9 mi. WSW 55.5 33.2 55.5 55 Table 3: Estimated noise impact at NSA's during Phase 2-8 Construction Approx. Distance and Estimated Est'd ISP CISF Ph. 2-8 Est'd Sound Level Est'd Total Ldn EPA Recm'd NSA Type Direction relative to ISP Ambient Ldn Construction Ldn (Ldn) of ISP CISF during Ldn CISF during Operation Construction 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 47.9 37.7 41.4 49.1 70 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 42.6 43.0 39.9 46.8 70 3

Boundary 4000 ft. WNW 41.6 43.7 39.1 46.6 70 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 39.1 57.8 58.4 61.2 (Onsite) 5 L5A Pad NE Corner 39.8 52.2 55.1 57.0 (Onsite) 6 Residential 3.9 mi. WSW 64.5 25.0 33.3 64.5 55 7

Residential 4.1 mi. WSW 58.9 24.3 28.8 58.9 55 8

Residential 5.3 mi. WSW 47.0 21.8 34.5 47.2 55 9

Residential 4.9 mi. WSW 55.5 22.6 33.2 55.5 55 Table 4 summarizes the expected personnel noise exposure during various phases of CISF activity, expressed in terms of A-weighted Time Weighted Average (TWA).

Table 4: Estimated personnel noise exposure (TWA)

Construction, Operations Construction, Phase 1 Phases 2 - 8 General Earthwork 83 Cask Building 92 Security/Admin Building 94 SNF Pad 1 88 87 Protected Area 83 78 Storage Module Construction 92 Storage Module Transport 89 Acoustical analysis indicates that construction and operation of the CISF are expected to be well below EPA and HUD guidelines (55 LDN residential, 70 LDN industrial/rural) at offsite locations without noise mitigation efforts.

Personnel noise exposure is expected to be above the OSHA action level TWA of 85 in many cases, but well within ranges normally associated with construction activity and industrial operations. As is common in industry, personnel noise exposure can be mitigated through page 2 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 the use of hearing protective devices (e.g., ear plugs or ear muffs), but can be further aided by reduction of back-up alarm output levels and selection of for quiet tools and equipment.

INTRODUCTION In this report, Nelson Acoustics presents the results of acoustical analyses for the proposed Interim Storage Partners' (ISP) Consolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF). Information is included that responds to NRC's information requests:

RAI-01: a pre-construction ambient survey along Waste Control Specialists' (WCS) western property line and for residential locations in Eunice NM, RAI-02: an analysis of environmental sound (average and maximum) arriving at nearby receptors during construction and operation, and RAI-03: an analysis of worker exposure to sound (average and maximum) from construction and operational activities.

The CISF is located to the north of WCS' current operations in a remote portion of Andrews County, Texas. WCS has three adjacent industrial neighbors immediately to the west:

• Urenco, which enriches uranium in a completely enclosed facility.

• Sundance Services, which operates a landfill for oilfield waste disposal, and

• Permian Basin Materials, which quarries aggregate materials.

Nine receptor points ("Noise Sensitive Areas" or NSA's) have been selected for study.

• One is onsite at the southwest corner of the CISF,

• One is at the northeast corner of WCS' adjacent LSA Pad,

• Three NSA's have been selected along the western boundary of WCS,

• Four NSA's have been selected to represent residential locations in and near the town of Eunice NM An overview of the study area, along with locations of NSA' s and background measurements are shown in Figures 1 - 3 in the attached Appendix, pages 19 - 20.

SOUND CRITERIA The US Environmental Protection Agency promulgated guidelines 1 for environmental sound levels "requisite to protect the publich health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety".

Values relevant to the present study for compatible land use are:

• 55 Ldn at residential properties, and

• 70 Ldn at industrial properties and general unpopulated land.

EP A's recommended approach is based on the Day-Night Sound Level Ldn, a weighted daily 1 Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate page 3 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 energy average A-weighted sound level. The nighttime average sound level (Ln) is adjusted upwards by 10 dB to compensate for additional nighttime sensitivity between the hours of 22:00 and 07:00 local. The daytime sound level (Ld) is not adjusted.

(

15 9

)

L

= 10 log 100,lLd + -

100,l(Ln+lO) dn 10 24 24 The effect of the nighttime adjustment is such that, for sounds that are continuous, Ldn is approximately 6.4 dB above the measured 24-hour LA,eq.

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development subsequently issued guidelines for environmental sound levels2 pursuant to it's mission to "provide decent housing and a suitable living environment for all Americans":

• Acceptable:

Ldn =S 65

• Normally Unacceptable:

65 <Ldn =S 75

• Unacceptable:

Ldn > 75 Nelson Acoustics is not aware of any state, county, or local noise regulations affecting this project.

Workplace noise exposure is administered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the US Department of Labor3. Maximum Permissible Noise Exposure is defined as the equivalent Time-Weighted Average (TWA) of 90 dBA for 8-hour duration. Above the Action Level of 85 dBA, employers must implement a hearing conservation program including hearing protectors, noise dosimetry, training, audiometric testing, and recordkeeping. An additional requirement prohibits unprotected transient events in excess of 140 dB(C). However, it should be noted that OSHA does not specify a maximum permissible A-weighted sound level.

Hearing protectors must be sufficient to attenuate employee exposure to an 8-hour TWA of 90 dBA or below. For employees that have already experienced a standard threshold shift, hearing protectors must attenuate to 85 dBA or below. Hearing protectors are rated in terms of "Noise Reduction Rating", but the nature of the laboratory rating and studies of actual benefit in the workplace suggest that actual dBA reduction can be notably less than the NRR rating implies.

2 "The Noise Guidebook, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Community Planning and Development, publishing date listed as 2009 online, document certain predates this.

3 29 CFR 1910.95 "Occupational Noise Exposure" page 4 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis SITE/FACILITY DESCRIPTION Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 An area layout around the CISF is provided by Figure 2 (Appendix, p. 19). The CISF will consist of eight concrete storage pads constructed in succession, a railroad spur to deliver casks, a Cask Handling building, and a Security/Administration building (see Figure 4,

p. 20). Area landforms are generally flat with the exception earthworks such as storage pits, quarries, and large material storage piles.

During construction, the majority of noise will be generated by

• specific earthmoving and concrete work equipment, along with

• generic support equipment (air compressors and portable generators) and

• individual building construction activities (such as grinding, welding).

During operation, the primary noise sources include

• outdoor concrete delivery and pouring for Storage Module Construction,

• a slow-moving Storage Module Transport which must be closely accompanied in order to monitor radiation levels, and

• building mechanical equipment such as ventilation fans and roof-top A/C units.

• Rail activity associated with CISF operation is estimated on the basis of one additional train per day carrying five casks to be stored.

Away from the CISF, primary noise sources are roadway traffic on TX/NM 176 and NM 18 which carry a significant fraction of heavy trucks associated with oil and gas activity.

Additional significant noise sources in and around Eunice include two gas plants with flares, and the Texas-New Mexico Railway along with the associated WCS siding.

AMBIENT SOUND STUDY (in response to RAI-01)

Current ambient sound levels were measured at locations between the proposed CISF and nearest industrial and residential properties during a site visit by David Nelson of Nelson Acoustics spanning 25 - 26 July, 2019. The general noise environment observed at each measurement location is described in Table 5. Measurement locations and their associated NSA's are depicted in Figures 1 - 3 (pp. 19-20). Measured A-weighted sound levels are summarized in Table 6 (dashes indicate that measurements were not made during that time period). Sunny, warm weather conditions prevailed during the measurements (Appendix, Table A-1, p. 21).

Experience and judgment has been exercised in order to decide which sounds constitute the "background". In general, sounds that are infrequent or whose schedule is difficult to discern (e.g., flaring at Eunice's North Gas Plant, rail operations) or seasonal (e.g., insects) are excluded in order to establish a baseline that is likely to be applicable all year (Table 7).

page 5 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Table 5: Sources of ambient sound Location Description Dominant Sources Secondary Sources MOl Near South Gas Plant Gas Plant Operation Near North Gas Plant, Flaring Flare M03 Near North Gas Plant, Not Flaring Urban Traffic Nearby Pumpjack M04 Brunson Cemetery Highway Traffic Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Infrequent or Intermittent Sources (excluded)

Nearby Industrial Activity M06 East End of Ave. S Urban and Highway Traffic Municipal Pool Equipment, Animals M07 Drinkard Ln near NM 18 Highway Traffic Insects MOS Picnic Area North of Love's Travel Center Highway Traffic M14 West Boundary at Urenco Highway Traffic Wind in Vegetation WCS Train, Insects Sundance Operat ions, Wind in M15 Near West Boundary at Sundance Highway Traffic Vegetat ion WCS Train, Insects M16 Near ISP CISF SW Corner Highway Traffic, Wind in Vegetation WCS Operations WCS Train, Insects Wind in Vegegation, WCS M17 N Side of Retention Pond Highway Traffic Operations WCS Train, Insects Table 6: Measured Ambient Sound Levels Affects Estimates Morning Midday Afternoon/

Locat ion Description Details at NSA's (dBA]

[dBA]

Evening

[dBA]

MOl Near South Gas Plant 1425 ft. N of Plant Center 7, 9 57.3 Near North Gas Plant, Flaring 1300 ft. S of Flare 75.9 M03 Near North Gas Plant, Not Flaring 8, 9 42.1 M04 Brunson Cemetery 825 ft. W of NM 207 9

46.6 M06 End of Ave. S East end of Materials Yard 8

46.3 37.3 42.1 M07 Drinkard Ln near NM 18 775 ft. SE of intersection 7

50.3 40.4 37.5 MOS NM DOT Picn ic Area opposite Love's Travel Center 300 ft. N of roadway 6

57.2 58.0 57.6 M14 West Boundary at Uren co 4250 ft. N of NM 176 1

43.8 M15 Near West Boundary at Sundance 7725 ft. N of NM 176 2, 3 39.9 M16 Near ISP CISF SW Corner 300 ft. E of SW Corner 4, 5 36.3 M17 N Side of Retention Pond 1700 ft. N of TX 176 40.7 Table 7: Disposition of contributions to Ambient Ldn Schedule Va riability Included in Description Ldn?

Roadway Traffic Constant Slowly varying Yes WCS Train Irregular Brief No Texas and New Mexico Railway Irregular Brief No Wind in Vegetation Common Fluctuat ing Yes South Gas Plant Constant Continuous Yes North Gas Plant Flare Irregula r Continuous No Insects Seasona l Continuous No Vehicle Activities WCS Daily Continuous Yes Vehicle Act ivities Su ndance Services Daily Continuous Yes Vehicle Activities Permiam Materials Daily Continuous Yes Measurements were made near the selected NSA's in accessible locations that respect residents' privacy. Daytime NSA values are derived from measured values adjusted for relative source-receptor distance. Nighttime NSA values were not measured but, because roadway traffic is the primary ambient noise contributor at all locations, are estimated as 4.8 dBA less than daytime values based on hourly traffic volumes provided by TxDOT. The overall ambient Ldn is estimated from Ld and Ln inputs given in Table 8.

page 6 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Table 8: Derivation of Ambient Ldn Related Est'd Ambient NSA Measurement Description Ld [dBA]

Positions 1

M14 West Property Boundary near Urenco 45.1 2

M15 West Property Boundary near Sundance 39.9 3

M15 West Property Boundary near Permian 38.9 4

M16 Center of Phase 1 Pad 36.1 5

M16 NE Corner of LSA Pad 37.1 6

M08 Residences near intersection of NM 176 and NM 18 61.8 7

M07 Residence on NM 18Sof NM 176 56.2 8

M06 Residences at E edge of Eunice NM 44.2 9

M0l, M04, M08 Residences along NM 176 near RR Crossing 52.8 Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Est'd Ambient Resulting Ln [dBA]

Ambient Ldn [dBA]

40.3 47.9 35.1 42.6 34.1 41.6 31.3 38.9 32.3 39.8 57.0 64.5 51.4 58.9 39.4 47.0 48.0 55.5 The ambient sound levels described above compare favorably to results from a HUD Traffic Noise analysis based on traffic volume data obtained from TXDOT and NMDOT, as well as with a venerable estimating method based on population density (which predicts LDN 51.4 for Eunice's 877.5 persons/square mile).

Industrial activity within WCS and nearby at Urenco, Sundance, and Permian Materials, exerted a minimal impact on the observed Ldn in comparison with highway traffic.

CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL SOUND AT RECEPTORS (in response to RAI-02)

Equipment types and counts for Construction and Operational Phases have been tabulated by Joe Pere of CJI and were used as the basis for this analysis (see Appendix, Table A-2,

p. 21). Additional noise sources likely to exist on site have been added, including backup alarms, building mechanical equipment, construction support equipment, and some larger handtools.

Noise sources as classified, along with their presumed operational extent and acoustic centers, are tabulated in Appendix Tables A-3 through A-5 (pp. 21-22).

A-weighted Sound Power Level and temporal Usage Factors (UF) for construction vehicles were obtained from the FHW A's Road Construction Noise Model. Typical construction octave band spectral shapes and Sound Power Levels for other equipment were derived from ESEERCO (Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation), the New York Dept. of Environmental Protection, and NIOSH Power Tool databases as well as Nelson Acoustics' project files. Noise emission levels from the WCS Train were extracted from direct measurements performed during the site visit.

Shift-average sound power levels (Appendix Table A-6, p. 22) combine operational sound power levels with the assumed percentage operational time. Maximum A-weighted sound power levels (Appendix Table A-7, p. 22) are presumed to occur in the rare event that all page 7 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 equipment is operating simultaneously. The number of backup alarms involved in a maximum event is based on the largest number likely to sound simultaneously at least 1 second per shift. During operational phases, the maximum sound level occurs at some locations when the Train sounds its horn exactly at its nearest approach to the observation point. In the case of NSA #4, the distance is only 100 feet; maximum levels are elevated accordingly.

The modeled shift-average sound pressure level (for the i-th equipment type in thej-th octave band) is based on the operating sound power level (Lw), the number of units operating (N), and the usage factor (UF). Factors for geometric divergence due to distance (Adiu) and excess attenuation due to air (Aair) and ground absorption (Agr) were computed in accordance with ISO 9613-2 (1996). No "credit" is taken for attenuation from intervening terrain, buildings, or materials piles that could further reduce offsite levels (these barriers could be bypassed under certain weather conditions and are therefore considered unreliable in this application).

The totalj-th octave band sound pressure level from all equipment at a receptor point are aggregated as L

. = 10 loglO' 10° lLp,eq,i,j p,eq,1 L

The A-weighted overall sound pressure levels is then computed from the octave band sound pressure levels and the A-weighting octave band corrections as L

= 10 log 10° l(Lp,eq,j+Aj) pA,eq 10 L j

Computed Lm/s take into account the summertime work schedule (beginning 06:00 CDT),

the shift lengths (10 hrs for construction, 8 hrs for operation), and time offset between MDT and CDT applying to NSA's 1 - 3 and 6 - 9.

Detailed computations of shift-average and maximum A-weighted sound pressure level at each NSA are tabulated in Appendix Tables A-8 through A-16 (pp. 23-27) for Construction phases, and A-17 through A-25 (pp. 27-30) for Operations.

Time-average noise impact at receptors is tabulated in Table 9 - 11 in terms of Ldn.

Comparison is made to EPA guidelines for industrial and residential properties. No guideline value is tabulated for the NSA #4 or NSA #5 because WCS, whose adjacent land encloses the CISF, presumably considers itself closely allied with its operation. However, the Ldn 70 guideline would apply if NRC wishes to consider them as neighboring properties.

page 8 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 The Lm/s contributed by the proposed CISF are expected to be well below EPA guidelines at the offsite locations. It should be noted that some of the residential locations already exceed EPA guidelines due to high levels of nearby roadway traffic, although they still fall within HUD's acceptability guideline.

Table 9: Estimated Noise Impact at NSA's during Phase 1 Construction Approx. Distance and Estimated Est'd ISP CISF Ph. 1 Est'd Total Ldn during EPA Potential NSA Type Direction relative to ISP Ambient Ldn Construction Ldn Construction Recommended Noise CISF Ldn Increase 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 47.9 43.2 49.1 70 1.3 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 42.6 48.4 49.4 70 6.8 3

Boundary 4000ft. WNW 41.6 48.6 49.4 70 7.8 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 39.1 69.9 69.9 (Onsite) 30.8 5

LSA Pad NE Corner 39.8 60.0 60.1 (Onsite) 20.3 6

Residential 3.9 mi. WSW 64.5 30.2 64.5 55 0.0 7

Residential 4.1 mi. WSW 58.9 29.6 58.9 55 0.0 8

Residential 5.3 mi. WSW 47.0 27.1 47.0 55 0.0 9

Residential 4.9mi. WSW 55.5 27.9 55.5 55 0.0 Table 10: Estimated Noise Impact at NSA's during Operation Approx. Distance and Ambient Ldn Est'd Sound Level Est'd "Total" Ldn (ISP EPA Potential NSA Type Direction relative to ISP (via Meas'd Ld (Ldn) of ISP CISF CISF + Ambient Recommended Noise CISF

& Est'd Ln) during Operation noise)

Ldn Increase 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 47.9 41.4 48.7 70 0.9 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 42.6 39.9 44.5 70 1.9 3

Boundary 4000 ft. WNW 41.6 39.1 43.5 70 1.9 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 39.1 58.4 58.5 (Onsite) 19.4 5

LSA Pad NE Corner 39.8 55.1 55.3 (Onsite) 15.5 6

Residential 3.9mi. WSW 64.5 33.3 64.5 55 0.0 7

Residential 4.1 mi. WSW 58.9 28.8 58.9 55 0.0 8

Residential 5.3 mi. WSW 47.0 34.5 47.2 55 0.2 9

Residential 4.9mi. WSW 55.5 33.2 55.5 55 0.0 Table 11: Est'd Noise Impact at NSA's during Ph. 2-8 Construction w/ Operation Approx. Distance and Estimated Est'd ISP CISF Ph. 2-8 Est'd Sound Level Est'd Total Ldn EPA Recm'd Potential NSA Type Direction relative to ISP Ambient Ldn Construction Ldn (Ldn) of ISP CISF during Ldn Noise CISF during Operation Construction Increase 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 47.9 37.7 41.4 49.1 70 1.2 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 42.6 43.0 39.9 46.8 70 4.2 3

Boundary 4000ft. WNW 41.6 43.7 39.1 46.6 70 5.0 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 39.1 57.8 58.4 61.2 (Onsite) 22.1 5

LSA Pad NE Corner 39.8 52.2 55.1 57.0 (Onsite) 17.2 6

Residential 3.9 mi. WSW 64.5 25.0 33.3 64.5 55 0.0 7

Residential 4.1 mi. WSW 58.9 24.3 28.8 58.9 55 0.0 8

Residential 5.3 mi. WSW 47.0 21.8 34.5 47.2 55 0.3 9

Residential 4.9mi. WSW 55.5 22.6 33.2 55.5 55 0.0 Maximum sound levels are tabulated in comparison to the daytime average sound levels due to both the ambient and the denoted activities in Tables 12 - 14. The maxima tabulated in Table 14 for Phases 2 - 8 are from the construction activities only. Maxima due to Operation (in particular due to the Train) would also apply during the period but are tabulated separately in Table 13.

page 9 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table 12: Estimated Maximum Noise Levels at NSA's during Phase 1 Construction Approx. Distance and Estimated Estimated Ph.1 Total Ph. 1 Estimated Max Lp NSA Type Direction relative to ISP CISF Ambient Ld Construction Ld Construction Ld during Ph. 1 Construction 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 45.1 40.7 46.5 48.0 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 39.9 45.9 46.9 53.9 3

Boundary 4000 ft. WNW 38.9 46.2 46.9 54.2 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 36.4 69.1 69.1 75.9 5

LSA Pad NE Corner 37.1 59.3 59.3 68.0 6

Residential 3.9mi. WSW 61.8 27.8 61.8 33.5 7

Residential 4.1 mi. WSW 56.2 27.1 56.2 32.8 8

Residential 5.3 mi. WSW 44.2 24.6 44.3 30.3 9

Residential 4.9mi. WSW 52.8 25.4 52.8 31.1 Table 13: Estimated Maximum Noise Levels at NSA's during Operation Approx. Distance and Estimated Estimated Total Estimated Max Lp NSA Type Direction relative to ISP CISF Ambient Ld Operational Ld Operational Ld during Operation 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 45.1 38.4 46.0 75.3 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 39.9 36.9 41.6 68.6 3

Boundary 4000 ft. WNW 38.9 36.1 40.7 63.1 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 36.4 55.4 55.5 96.3 5

LSA Pad NE Corner 37.1 52.1 52.2 73.4 6

Residential 3.9mi. WSW 61.8 30.3 61.8 62.9 7

Resident ial 4.1 mi. WSW 56.2 25.8 56.2 52.8 8

Residential 5.3 mi. WSW 44.2 31.5 44.5 65.3 9

Resident ial 4.9mi. WSW 52.8 30.2 52.8 62.9 Table 14: Est'd Maximum Noise Levels at NSA's during Phase 2-8 Construction Approx. Distance and Estimated Estimated Ph. 2-8 Total Ph. 2-8 Estimated Max Lp NSA Type Direction relative to ISP CISF Ambient Ld Construction Ld Construction Ld during Ph. 2-8 Construction 1

Boundary 6100 ft. SW 45.1 35.2 45.6 44.1 2

Boundary 3900 ft. W 39.9 40.6 43.3 50.9 3

Boundary 4000 ft. WNW 38.9 41.2 43.2 51.7 4

ISP CISF SW Corner Protected Area 36.4 57.1 57.1 67.5 5

LSA Pad NE Corner 37.1 51.5 51.6 62.8 6

Resident ia I 3.9mi. WSW 61.8 22.5 61.8 28.6 7

Resident ial 4.lmi. WSW 56.2 21.9 56.2 27.9 8

Residential 5.3mi. WSW 44.2 19.3 44.3 25.4 9

Residentia I 4.9mi. WSW 52.8 20.1 52.8 26.2 Elevated sound levels may be noticeable from the property boundaries with Urenco, Sundance Services, and Permian Materials (NSA's #1 - 3) during construction. During Operation however the average sound levels increase less than 2 dBA; the additional activity is likely to go unnoticed. In any event, Lm/ s are well below the EPA guideline for industrial land use.

Residents of Eunice (NSA's #6 - 9) are expected to be unable to hear Construction activities during any Phase because of the relatively high level of traffic noise already present in the area. During Operation the only potentially audible impact from CISF is due to the passage of one additional Train per day. This is also likely to go unnoticed to the extent that it is infrequent and already familiar, and remains within current timeframes.

page 10 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 In any event, CISF contribution to Lm/ s are well below both the EPA guideline for residential properties and prevailing background levels.

NSA's on site are more strongly affected because of proximity. Ldn's on adjacent WCS property only approach the EPA Guideline for Industrial land use during initial construction, otherwise they are well below. However it is clear that ISP CISF construction and operational phases cause negligible hearing conservation risk to WCS personnel at the nearby LSA Pad: the highest predicted shift average sound level is 60.6 dBA, well below the OSHA-mandated action level of 85.0 dBA. The sounding of the train horn at crossings can lead to brief moderately high sound levels, but these are familiar and are already factored into the reported averages.

PERSONNEL EXPOSURE TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL SOUND (in response to RAI-03)

Personnel noise exposure is a function of the time-average sound pressure level received during a shift. The source sound power levels, their percentage "on time" duration, and the "time and motion" aspect of location and orientation relative to individuals, all play a role in determining noise exposure. The distance and orientation may be relatively predictable during operations, but much less so during construction when vehicles and personnel are continuously changing.

Model inputs are based on the source strengths and assumptions given in Tables A-2 through A-7 (pp. 20-21), identical with the foregoing section (RAI-02).

The modeled shift-average A-weighted sound pressure level is based on the operating A-weighted sound power level for the i-th equipment type (LwA), the number of units operating (N), and the usage factor (UF). Because of the relatively short distance involved, excess attenuation due to air and ground absorption are omitted. Because the remaining terms are independent of frequency, the sound pressure level can be estimated directly in A-weighted terms as:

LpA,eq,i = LwA,i + 10 log10 N; + 10 log10 UF; - D The overall A-weighted sound pressure level from each equipment type (i) at a receptor point are aggregated as:

L

= 10 log 10°*1LpA,eq,i pA,eq 10 L The divergence factor Dis simply 20 log (r/ 3.28)- 8, where r is in feet, for well-defined source-receptor distances. In particular, relatively close standoffs of 20 ft. and 10 ft. are assumed for workers attending the ready-mix truck during Storage Module Construction and checking radiation levels while accompanying the Cask Transport vehicle during Storage Module Transport.

page 11 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 A different approach is required for construction activities that are distributed across a large area. Each of the designated construction subprojects is assumed to take place within a work area that extends 50 feet beyond the building or area footprint on all sides. One quadrant of the rectangular area is then divided into a lOxlO array of rectangles to simulate a "maximum scenario" in which the observer is located in the center of the work area with equipment all around. The divergence of sound power for a given array element is:

rmn Dm n = -20 log10 -*- - 8 3.28 The value at Do,o (for which r = 0) is set to -10 dB. The average geometric divergence for equipment evenly distributed across the site to a central observer is:

D

= _1_'\\' '\\' 1QD1Dm,n central lOO LL m

n The "minimum scenario" by contrast would occur when the observer is located at an outside corner of the overall work area. Because the distances are all double relative to the "maximum case", the minimum-case result would be Dcentral -

6 dB. An intermediate value is used in this analysis:

D = Dcentral -

3 This analysis addresses baseline noise levels in each work area. Individual noise exposure may be increased and highly sensitive to details of particular work practices, including events like sound radiating from extended workpieces or unexpectedly close long-term positioning relative to a piece of heavy equipment.

RAI-03 makes reference to "peak" noise levels. The technical definition of "peak" is the instantaneous maximum pressure, which is not perceptible by humans nor is it hazardous unless the levels exceed 140 dB(C). That latter occur primarily in the context of explosions, firearms, and artillery, which are not expected for this project. They could occur during accidental impacts such as dropping a tool or wooden pallet nearby. By their nature such accidental events are impossible to predict or estimate. They are rare on a typical job site and are usually easily avoided. The concept of "peak" has therefore been interpreted to mean "maximum" on a human timescale.

Personnel noise exposure is a function of the Time-Weighted Average (TWA). When evaluated according to the OSHA paradigm ("5-dBA exchange rate"), TWA is identical to shift-average LA,eq for continuous noise source but less for fluctuating, intermittent, and transient sources. It includes the LpA,max events tabulated below. The TWA's reported here are simply the modeled shift-average LA,eq's. The small difference ( 2 dBA) anticipated for the construction and activities contemplated in this report has been retained as a safety factor.

page 12 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 OSHA's most basic requirement is that workers not receive an unprotected noise dose in excess of 100% in any given shift. This corresponds to 90.0 dBA TWA for an 8-hr shift and 88.4 dBA for a 10-hour shift. OSHA does not specify a maximum permissible A-weighted sound pressure level.

Less obvious perhaps is fact that multiple requirements (periodic dosimetry and audiometric testing, providing hearing protective devices, training and recordkeeping) become active when the TWA reaches 85.0 dBA for 8 hrs or 83.4 dBA for a 10-hr shift. For this reason,

85. 0 TWA is the recommended target value.

As will be seen, some of the estimated TWA's exceed 90 dBA in large part because of backup alarms. Generic backup alarms are typically adjusted to maximum power output, roughly 115 dBA at 4 ft. However this is usually considerably more than necessary to assure awareness of moving vehicles. It is recommended that these alarm levels be reduced in order to limit unnecessary personnel noise exposure. It turns out that OSHA regulations permit backup alarm levels to be reduced as long as they are readily audible, or to use a dedicated observer behind each vehicle and eliminate the alarms altogether.

Because of their significant impact, a parallel analysis has been performed on the assumption that they can be reduced 10 dBA, which sounds approximately 1/2 as loud (on some jobsites it has been possible to reduce them by as much as 20 dBA). The reduced level would correspond to 97 dBA at 10 ft., which is still likely to be sufficient for workplace safety, especially if all backup alarms on the site are similarly adjusted.

Results for Estimated Personnel TWAs are given below in Tables 15 - 17, including a parallel set of values associated with backup alarm noise reduction ("NC B/U Alarms").

Estimated shift-average construction levels are notably elevated in the work areas for the Cask and Security/Admin Buildings because of the large amount of equipment assumed to be active in a relatively small area. Construction levels are lower in other, more extended work areas.

Maximum sound levels occur under the rare circumstance that all equipment and several backup alarms are operating simultaneously and, for locations near the railroad tracks, that the Train also sounds its horn simultaneously. These values are expected to be conservative in the sense that they are unlikely to be exceeded. It bears repeating that OSHA does not mandate a maximum permissible A-weighted sound level.

Detailed computations of shift-average sound pressure level at each NSA are tabulated in Appendix Tables A-26 through A-34 (pp. 30-32), and for maximum A-weighted sound pressure level, Appendix Tables A-35 through A-43 (pp. 32-34).

page 13 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table 15: Estimated Baseline Personnel Noise Exposure during Ph. 1 Construction Activity TWA TWAw/ NC B/U Benefit Max LpA Max LpA+ NC Alarms B/ U Alarms General Earthwork 83 78 4

89 83 Cask Building 92 89 3

99 93 Security/Admin Building 94 91 3

100 95 SNF Pad 1 88 83 5

96 89 Protected Area 83 78 4

89 83 Table 16: Estimated Baseline Personnel Noise Exposure during Operation Activity TWA TWAw/ NC B/U Benefit Max LpA Max LpA + NC Alarms B/U Ala rms Storage Module Construction I 92 I

89 I

3 103 I

95 I

Storage Module Transport I

89 I

89 I

0 97 I

96 I

Table 17: Estimated Baseline Personnel Noise Exposure during Phase 2-8 Construction including Operation Activity TWA TWAw/ NC B/U Benefit Max LpA Max LpA+ NC Alarms B/U Alarms SNF Pad 1 I

87 I

81 I

6 97 I

88 I

Protected Area I

78 I

73 I

5 89 I

79 I

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Dosimetry Benefit 6

5 5

7 6

Benefit 8

1 Benefit 9

10 Onsite sound levels are expected to be highest during construction. If contractors are used for this purpose, they should already have their own hearing conservation program in place.

CISF operational noise exposures can be estimated in advance by finding or making dosimetry readings on similar activities at WCS. Given that the current "pessimistic" estimates documented in this report suggest TWAs of 89, actual TWAs may be close enough to 85 that administrative or engineering controls can yield further reductions. If the TW As are below 85, the OSHA mandate for a hearing conservation program falls away. Even without it however, periodic dosimetry is recommended in order to identify, assess and mitigate any changes in work practices that could elevate TW As.

2. Hearing Protectors Hearing protection is recommended for all the onsite activities contemplated in this report.

Noise Reduction Ratings (NRR's) of hearing protectors capable of reducing at-the-ear exposure to 85.0 dBA (8-hour, Operation) and 83.4 dBA (10-hour, Construction) are determined following a method recommended by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health:

(TWA - L + 7)

NRR =------

C page 14 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 where Lis the target level, and C takes the values 0.75 for earmuffs and 0.5 for expanding foam earplugs (due to imperfect fit in actual practice). Recommended NRRs are provided in Tables 18 - 20.

Note that these recommendations incorporate the "best practice" of targeting 85 dBA rather than 90 dBA. This reduces the risk of noise-induced hearing loss, and obviates the need to track which personnel have a pre-existing STS when distributing hearing protectors.

Table 18: Recommended HPD NRRs for Phase 1 Construction Activity TWA NRR Muffs NRR Foam TWA+ NC B/U NRR Muffs NRR Foam Alarms General Earthwork 83 9

13 78 Cask Building 92 22 32 89 17 25 Security/Admin Building 94 24 36 91 19 29 SNF Pad 1 88 16 23 83 9

14 Protected Area 83 9

13 78 Table 19: Recommended HPD NRRs for Operation Activity TWA NRR Muffs NRR Foam TWA+ NC B/U NRR Muffs NRR Foam Alarms Storage Module Construction I

92 I

19 I

28 89 I

15 I

23 Storage Module Transport I

89 I

16 I

23 89 I

16 I

23 Table 20: Recommended HPD NRRs for Phase 2-8 Construction Activity TWA NRR Muffs NRR Foam TWA+ NC B/U NRR Muffs NRR Foam Alarms SNF Pad 1 I

87 I

15 I

22 81 I

7 I

10 Protected Area I

78 I

I 73 I

I 3.Backup Alarms Reduction of backup alarm sound levels has a significant effect on personnel noise exposure and should be seriously considered. Besides the reduced risk of hearing loss, lower sound levels permit lesser-performing HPDs to be worn. This allows approaching vehicles, verbal instructions, and other communications to be more readily heard. It also reduces the sense of isolation some workers report which, ironically, may lead them to partially or completely remove their earplugs. This is especially true of workers who already have hearing loss.

Backup alarm noise control is expected to reduce TW As by 3 to 6 dBA and maxima by 5 to 10 dBA during construction.

page 15 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 "Smart" backup alarms have been developed over the years that adjust to the prevailing background or have a different noise spectrum.

See the OSHA regulation that allows this for specifics: 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart "O", 1926.601.b.4 and 1926.602.a.9. The following devices are approved by the NYC Department of Environmental Protection:

BACKUP ALARMS

• Preco Electronics 45, 200 and 6000 Series www.precosafety.com

• Ecco Group Smart Alarms, 500 and 700 Series www.eccolink.com

• Grote Industries Model 73040 www grate com

• Brigade Electronics BBS-TEK Series WWW bbs-tek com

4. Vehicles Vehicles should be turned off when not in use. However if they must be left running, they should preferably be parked at least 25 feet away from workers.

Vehicles should be selected from among those with lower tabulated sound power levels and interior operator sound pressure levels ("Buy Quiet"). This information ust be requested by model from manufacturers.

Most vehicles have Operator sound pressure levels of 80 dBA or below. However Operators' actual exposure can vary widely due to one or more factors:

• Operating closed-cab trucks with windows open, which elevates the sound level to roughly that of the surrounding work area,

• Playing music or other entertainment, in order to be audible, must be at least 5 dBA above the vehicle's interior noise, and

• Use of communications radios which, in order to be intelligible, must in turn be set at least 5 dBA above the vehicle's interior noise including the entertainment.

Thus the best results are obtained when operators are required to keep windows closed (which of course requires an air conditioned cab) and communicate by radio. No entertainment music players or headsets should be allowed. Experience has shown that vehicle operator exposure can be highly individualized. For this reason vehicle operator noise exposure should be evaluated for each individual operator of a closed-cab vehicle.

Diligent vehicle maintenance is strongly recommended. Factors such as damaged exhaust systems, failing fan belt clutches or idler bearings, elevated engine idle speeds, and rattling covers or guards, can all unnecessarily elevate a vehicle's exterior noise emission. Within the operator cab, sound-absorbing ceiling linings and sound-isolating floor mats typically suffer significant wear and tear on a normal jobsite. These should be replaced periodically to reduce the unnecessary buildup of interior vehicle sound.

The impact of additional noise exposure due to exceptional work practices or circumstances is tabulated below in absolute (Table 21) and relative (Table 22) terms. For example, adding 85 dBA TWA music to an 80 dBA closed-cab vehicle has the potential to cause a TWA of 86 page 16 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 (Table 21), an effective exposure increase of 6 dBA (Table 22).

Table 21: New TWA due to adding a new TWA contribution to an existing TWA TWA 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Add 80 83 84 84 85 85 86 87 88 89 90 90 91 92 93 94 95 Add 85 86 86 87 87 88 88 89 89 90 90 91 92 93 94 95 95 Add 90 90 91 91 91 91 91 91 92 92 93 93 94 94 95 95 96 Add 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 96 96 96 97 97 98 98 Table 22: Increase in TWA due to adding a new TWA contribution TWA 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Add 80 3

3 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

0 0

0 Add 85 6

5 5

4 4

3 3

2 2

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 Add 90 10 10 9

8 7

6 5

5 4

4 3

3 2

2 1

1 Add 95 15 14 13 12 11 10 10 9

8 7

6 5

5 4

4 3

5. Individual construction activities Power tools should be selected from among those with lower tabulated sound power levels

("Buy Quiet"). Listings can be found at:

https://wwwl.nyc.gov/assets/dep/downloads/pdf/air/noise/noise-vendor-guidance-small-construction -jobs. pdf, and

• https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noise/noise levels.html.

Position relative to vehicles during concrete pouring and steel erection can have a significant effect. These distances should be maximized when possible through activity planning within the work area.

Individual activities such as welding, installing sheet metal roof and wall panels, and particularly grinding can cause unpredictable and very high individual noise exposure. If necessary these activities should be dispersed physically to minimize the number of affected individuals, and rotated among workers in order to avoid a few individuals being overexposed. Special care should be taken to avoid grinding on or hammering extended resonant objects like sheet metal panels without applying local mechanical damping (e.g.,

small bags of shot or sand roughly 6" diameter by 1" thick).

For example, adding 90 dBA TWA due to grinding a large resonant workpiece in an otherwise 88 dBA environment has the potential to cause a TWA of 92 (Table 21), an effective exposure increase of 4 (Table 22).

page 17 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis

SUMMARY

AND FINAL COMMENT Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 The ambient environment throughout the survey area is dominated by significant roadway traffic noise, more than might be expected for the remoteness of the Site and the population of nearby Eunice NM. This appears to be due in large part to trucking activity related to oil-and gas exploration and production.

Construction and operational CISF sound levels at offsite receptors are expected to be well below EPA and HUD recommendations, aided significantly by the relatively large distances involved.

Worker noise exposures during construction are expected to be above OSHA's action level of 85 dBA TWA in many cases, but well within the expected range for such activities. Practical noise control recommendations are provided to reduce noise exposures along with appropriate levels of hearing protection. Attention to backup alarm levels alone can reduce TWAs 3 to 6 dBA.

Worker noise exposures during operations, including Storage Module Construction and Storage Module Transport, are also above 85 dBA. An initial dosimetry study is recommended to assess actual exposures in advance of CISF operations. Practical noise control recommendations are provided to reduce noise exposures and for appropriate levels of hearing protection.

Sincerely, NELSON ACOUSTICS (Member NCAC, TX F-3001) www.nelsonacoustical.com Ele d Signature David A Nelson, INCE Bd. Cert., P.E. (OR 17635, TX 81329)

Principal Consultant page 18 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Figure 1: Overview of Study Area, North Up (approximately 8 miles by 3 miles)

Figure 2: Overview of Study Area, North Up, around WCS page 19 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Figure 3: Overview of Study Area, North Up, around Eunice Figure 4: Site Layout, North approx. 30° counterclockwise from top of diagram page 20 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-1: Prevailing Weather Conditions during Measurements (WCS)

Time Wind speed Wind Temperature Rel. Humidity Barometric Pressure Date Range

[CDT]

[kts]

Direction

[9F)

[%]

[in. Hg]

Min Hourly 13:00 6.1 135 86.3 19.2 26.47 July 25 2019 Median Hourly 7.0 146 91.6 21.1 26.50 Max Hourly 17:30 8.4 182 92.3 29.7 26.52 Min Hourly 06:00 1.9 008 63.2 25.3 26.40 July 26 2019 Median Hourly 6.9 174 74.8 42.5 26.49 Max Hourly 13:30 9.9 205 90.0 62.1 26.54 Table A-2: CJI Construction Equipment Count List Phase Action Equipment HP Quantity per Hour 1

General Earthwork Heavy Haul Truck 350 4

1 General Earthwork Earthmover 500 2

1 Cask Building Pump Truck 400 1

1 Cask Building Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

1 Cask Building Construction Eq 400 2

1 Cask Building Earthmover 500 1

1 Security/Admin Bldg Pump Truck 400 1

1 Security/Admin Bldg Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

1 Security/Admin Bldg Construction Eq 400 2

1 Security/Admin Bldg Earthmover 500 1

1 SNF Pad Pump Truck 400 1

1 SNF Pad Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

1 SNF Pad Earthmover 500 2

1 Protected Area Heavy Haul Truck 350 1

1 Protected Area Earthmover 500 2

2-8 SNF Pad Pump Truck 400 1

2-8 SNF Pad Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

2-8 SNF Pad Earthmover 500 2

2-8 Protected Area Heavy Haul Truck 350 1

2-8 Protected Area Earthmover 500 2

Operations Storage Module Construction Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

Operations Storage Module Transport Transporter 350 1

Table A-3: Noise Source Classifications, Construction Phase 1 Classification Extent Presumed Acoustic Center Equipment from CJI List Add itions Owner-Controlled and (4) Heavy Haul Trucks, (2)

General Earthwork Protected Areas Center of Protected Area Earth move rs (6) Back-up Alarms Concrete Pumper, Ready-Mix (5) Back-up Alarms, (4)

Welding, (4) Grinding, Air Cask Building Around the Building Site Center of Cask Building Truck, (2) Const. Equipment, Compressor, Diesel Earthmover Generator Concrete Pumper, Ready-Mix (5) Back-up Alarms, (4)

Security/Admin Center of Security/Admin Welding, (4) Grinding, Air Building Around the Building Site Building Truck, (2) Const. Equipment, Compressor, Diesel Earthmover Generator SNF Pad (1) Pad ea. of (8) Phases Center of Phase 1 Pad Concrete Pumper, Ready-Mix (4) Back-up Alarms Truck, Earthmover Protected Area Protected Area Center of Protected Area Heavy Hau l Truck, (2)

(3) Back-up Alarms Earth movers page 21 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-4: Noise Source Classifications, Operations Classification Extent Presumed Acoustic Center Equipment from CJ I List Additions Storage Module Near Cask Hand ling Center of Cask Handling Ready-Mix Truck

{1) Back-up Alarms Construction Building Building Storage Module Between Cask Handling Between Cask Building and Transport (1) Back-up Alarms Transport Building and SNF Pad Phase 1 Pad Cask Building (8) unshrouded Ventilation Mechanical Around Cask Building Center of Cask Building Fans each long building side Equipment Secu rity/Admin Building Around Security/Admin Center of Security/ Admin (3) 12T RTUs Mechanical Building Building Equipment Tra in Siding Loop passing Nearest point on Nort h and (1) Train per Day through CISF South sides of Siding Loop Table A-5: Noise Source Classifications, Construction Phases 2 - 8 Classification Extent Presumed Acoustic Center Equipment from CJ I List Addit ions SNF Pad (1) Pad ea. of (8) Phases Center of Phase 2 Pad Concrete Pumper, Ready-Mix (4) Back-up Alarms Truck, Earthmover Protected Area Protected Area Center of Protected Area Heavy Haul Truck, (2)

(3) Back-up Alarms Eart hmovers Table A-6: Est'd Shift-Average Noise Levels during Construction and Operation Octave Band LwA,eq Equip. Type Data Source HP LpA, max@ % Utilization LwA,eq 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 so ft Earthmover RCNM 500 82 40 110 94 85 76 68 63 55 45 Heavy Hau l Truck RCNM 350 84 40 112 96 87 78 70 65 57 47 Pump Truck RCNM 400 82 20 107 91 82 73 65 60 52 42 Ready-M ix Truck RCNM 400 85 40 113 97 88 79 71 66 58 48 Tra nsporter RCNM 350 85 31 109 93 85 75 67 62 54 44 Backu p Alarm Project Files 93 20 115 115 Air Compressors RCNM 80 40 108 92 83 74 66 61 53 43 Diesel Generator RCNM 82 50 111 95 86 77 69 64 56 46 Weldi ng Database 40 105 85 92 91 93 96 93 91 Grinding Database 20 105 82 89 88 90 93 90 88 Bldg. Vent Fans Project Files 75 100 107 100 103 104 102 102 103 100 Rooftop A/C Units Project Files 100 92 86 86 83 86 81 74 72 SEL (A)

Octave Band SEL (A)

Tra in Measurement, at 825 ft.

1/shift 82 70 70 64 77 79 64 49 Table A-7: Est'd Shift-Average Noise Levels during Construction and Operation Octave Ba nd LwA,max Equip. Type Data Source HP LpA, max@ % Ut ilizat ion LwA,max 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 so ft Eart hmover RCN M 500 82 100 114 98 105 104 106 108 106 104 Heavy Haul Truck RCNM 350 84 100 116 100 107 106 108 110 108 106 Pump Truck RCNM 400 82 100 114 98 105 104 106 108 106 104 Ready-M ix Truck RCNM 400 85 100 117 101 108 107 109 111 109 107 Transporter RCN M 350 85 100 117 101 108 107 109 111 109 107 Backup Alarm Project Files 93 100 125 109 116 115 117 120 117 115 Air Compressors RCNM 80 100 112 96 103 102 104 106 104 102 Diesel Generator RCNM 82 100 114 98 105 104 106 108 106 104 Welding Data base 100 105 89 96 95 97 100 97 95 Grinding Data base 100 105 89 96 95 97 100 97 95 Bldg. Vent Fans Project Files 75 100 107 100 103 104 102 102 103 100 Rooftop A/C Units Project Files 100 92 86 86 83 86 81 74 72 Train Measurement 1/shift 131 108 112 119 132 133 115 101 page 22 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Table A-8: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #1 (Urenco)

Receptor N

E NSA 1

.4725

-4050 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Power Level LWA 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 General Earthwork 1175 1175 I

103 110 109 111 121 I

111 109 107 114 Gask Building 100 1150 I

105 112 110 112 120 I

112 110 108 115 Security/Admin Bldg 375 0

105 112 11 0 1i2 120 11 2 110 108 1i5 SNF Pad 525 725 101 108 106 108 119 108 106 105 112 Protected Area 1 75 1175 100 107 105 107 117 107 105 104 11 B/U Alanns Max 525 725 Oivorgonco Olstanco General Earthwork 7881

-75

-81

-83

-87

-92

-103

• 132 Cask Building 7094

-74

-80

-82

-85

-90

-100

• 126 Security/Admin Bldg 65 2

-73

.79

• 81

• 84

-BB

-97

• 121 SNF Pad 7097

-74

• BO

• 82

• 85

• 90

• 100

-126 Protected Area 7881

-75

-81

-BJ

-87

-92

-i03

-132 B/U Alarms Max 7097

-74

-80

-82

-85

-90

-100

-126 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level General Earthwork 28 29 26 25 28 8

-24 32 33 Cask Building JO 32 28 27 JO 13

• 16 34 35 Security/Admin Bldg 31 32 29 29 32 15 JS 36 SNF Pad 27 28 24 23 29 9

-20 31 32 Protected Area 25 26 22 21 25 4

-27 29 JO B/U Alarms Max LPA EO 42.5 36 37 33 33 37 18

-9 40 41 LON (NM. Summer) 43.2 LPAMAX 48.0 PHASES 2*8 Continuous Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 I

10 1 108 106 108 119 I

108 106 105 112 Protected Area 1175 1175 I

100 107 105 107 117 I

107 105 104 111 SIU Alanns Max 975 725 Dlvorgonco Distance SNF Pad (use #2) 7436 I

-74

-76

-78

-82

• 89 I

-99

-127 Protected Area 7881 I

-75

-81

-BJ

-87

-92 I -103

-132 BIU Alarms Max 7436 I

-74

-76

-78

-82

-89 I

-99

-127 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Lovet SNF Pad (use #2)

I 26 31 28 26 JO I

9

-21 31 36 Protected Area I

25 26 22 21 25 I

4

-27 29 JO B/U Alarms Max I

I LPA EO 37.0 28 32 29 27 31 10

-20 33 37 LON (NM. Summer) 37.7 LPA~o\\AX 44.1 Table A-9: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #2 (Sundance)

Receptor N

E NSA2

-500

-4050 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 General Earthwork 1 75 1175 103 110 109 111 121 1i1 109 107 1 4 Cask Building 100 1 50 105 112 1 0 1 2 120 1 2 1 0 108 1 5 Security/Admin Bldg 375 0

I 105 112 110 I

112 120 112 I

110 108 115 SNF Pad 525 725 I

101 108 106 I

108 119 108 I

106 105 112 Protecte<I Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 I

107 1 7 107 105 104 11 B/U Alarms Max 525 725 Dlvorgonco Distance General Earthwork 5487

-72

-78

-79

-81

• 85

• 92

• 112 Cask Building 5235

• 71

-77

-79

-81

• 84

-91

• 110 Security/Admin Bldg 4143

-69

-75

-77

-78

-80

-85

-101 SNF Pad 4884

-71

-76

-78

-BO

-82

-89

-107 Protecte<I Area 5487

-72

-78

.79

-81

• 85

• 92

-112 B/U Alarms Max 4884

-71

-76

-78

-BO

-82

-89

-107 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Levo!

General Earthwork 31 33 JO JO 36 19

-4 35 37 Cask Building 33 34 31 32 36 22 0

37 38 Securily/Admin Bldg JS 37 34 JS 41 27 9

39 40 SNF Pad JO 31 28 29 36 19

-1 34 36 Protected Area 28 29 26 26 33 15

-7 32 33 Bill Alarms Max LPAEQ 47.7 39 41 37 38 44 29 11 43 44 LON (NM. Summer) 48.4 LPAMAX 53.9 PHASES2-8 Continuous Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 I

101 108 106 I

108 119 108 I

106 105 112 Protected Area 1175 1175 I

100 107 105 I

107 117 107 I

105 104 111 BJU Alarms Max 975 725 Divorgonco D!stanco SNF Pad (use #2) 4998 I

-71

.73

-74 I

-76

• 81

• 88 I

• 107 Protected Area 5487 I

-72

• 78

-79 I

-81

-85 I

-92 I

-11 2 B/U Alarms Max 4998

-71

.73

-74

-76

-81

-BB

-107 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level SNF Pad (use #2)

I JO 35 32 I

32 38 20 I

0 34 39 Protecte<I Area I

28 29 26 I

26 33 15 I

-7 32 33 B/U Alarms Max I

I I

LPAEO 42.3 32 36 33 33 39 22 0

36 40 LON (NM. Summer) 43.0 LPAMAX 50.9 page 23 of34 Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Max Sound Power Lovol 250 500 1000 2000 4000 113 115 118 115 113 114 1i6 119 11 6 114 114 1i6 119 1 6 114 111 1 J 115 11 3 111 109 111 114 11 109 134 Max Sound Pressure Level JO 29 25 12

-20 32 31 29 17

-12 33 32 31 19

-7 29 28 26 13

-15 26 25 22 8

-23 44 37 37 45 22

.5 Max Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 111 I

113 115 113 111 109 I

111 114 111 109 I

131 Max Sound Pressure Level 33 I

31 26 13

-16 26 I

25 22 8

-23 I

42 33 32 42 15

-16 Max Sound Power Lovet 250 500 1000 2000 4000 113 115 1 8 1 5 113 1i 4 116 1 9 116 1 4 114 116 11 9 116 114 111 113 115 113 111 109 111 1 4 111 109 134 Max Sound Pressure Level 34 34 33 23 0

JS 36 JS 25 4

37 38 39 31 13 32 33 33 24 J

JO JO 29 19

.J 52 41 42 52 33 14 Max Sound Power Levo!

250 500 1000 2000 4000 I

111 113 115 I

113 111 I

109 111 114 I

111 109 I

131 I

Max Sound Pressure Level I

37 36 34 I

25 4

I JO JO 29 I

19

-3 I

so I

38 37 so 26 5

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Table A-10: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #3 (Permian)

Rocoptor N

E NSA3 925

-4050 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 General Earthwork 1175 1 75 103 I

110 109 111 I

121 111 109 107 114 Cask Building 100 1150 105 112 110 112 120 112 110 108 115 Sccurity!Admin Bldg 375 0

105 112 1 0 112 120 112 110 108 115

$NF Pad 525 725 101 108 106 108 119 108 106 105 112 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 I

107 105 107 I

117 107 105 104 111 B/lJ Alarms Max 525 725 Oivorgonco Distance General Earthwork 5231

• 71

-77

.79

• 81

-84

• 91

• 110 Cask Building 5265

-71

-77

.79

-81

-84

• 91

-111 Secufity/Admin Bldg 4087

-69

-75

• 76

-77

-79

-85

-100 SNF Pad 4792

-71

-76

-78

-79

-82

-89

-106 Protected Area 5231

-71

-77

-79

-81

-84

-91

• 110 BIU Alarms Max 4792

-71

-76

-78

.79

-82

-89

-106 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level General Earthwork 32 33 30 30 37 20

-1 36 37 Cask Building 33 34 31 32 36 21 0

37 38 Security/Admin Bldg 35 37 34 35 41 27 10 39 41 SNF Pad 30 31 28 29 36 20 0

34 36 Protected Area 28 30 26 27 34 17

.5 32 34 B/lJ Alanns Max LPAEO 47.9 39 41 38 38 44 30 11 43 45 LON (NM. Summer) 48.6 LPAMAX 54.2 PHASES 2-8 Continuous Sound Power Level LWA E

63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125

$NF Pad (use #2) 975 725 101 108 106 108 119 108 106 105 112 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 I

107 105 107 I

117 107 105 104 111 BJU Alanns Max 975 725 Dlvorgonco Distance SNF Pad (use #2) 4775

-71 I

-72

.74

-76 I

-80

-87

• 105 Protected Area 5231

-71 I

.77

-79

-81 I

-84

-91

. 110 BJU Alarms Max 4775

-71

.72

.74

• 76

-80

-87

-105 LPA Continuous Sound Prossuro Level SNF Pad (use #2) 30 I

35 33 33 I

38 22 2

34 40 Protected Area 28 I

30 26 27 I

34 17

-5 32 34 BIU Alanns Max LPAEO 43.0 32 36 34 34 40 23 2

36 41 LON (NM. Summer) 43.7 LPAMAX 51.7 Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Max Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 113 11 5 118 115 113 114 116 119 116 1 4 114 116 119 116 114 11 113 115 113 111 109 111 114 111 109 134 Max Sound Pressure Level 34 34 34 24 3

35 35 35 25 3

38 39 39 31 14 33 33 33 24 4

30 31 30 21

• 1 52 42 42 53 34 15 Max Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 111 113 115 113 111 109 111 I

114 111 109 I

I 131 I

Max Sound Pressure Level 37 37 I

35 26 6

I 30 31 I

30 21

• 1 I

51 38 38 51 27 7

Table A-11: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #4 (CISF SW Corner)

Receptor N

E NSA4 0

0 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 General EarthwOtk 1175 1175 103 110 109 111 121 111 109 107 114 113 115 118 115 113 Cask Building 100 1150 105 112 110 11 2 120 112 110 108 115 114 116 119 116 1 4 Security!Admin Bldg 375 0

105 112 I

11 0 112 120 I

112 110 108 115 114 116 119 116 114 SNF Pad 525 725 101 108 I

106 108 119 I

108 106 105 112 111 113 115 113 111 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 107 117 107 105 104 111 109 111 114 111 109 BIU Alarms Max 525 725 134 Dlvergem:e Distance General Earthwork 1662

-62

-66

-68

• 66

-67

-69

-75 Cask Building 1154

.59

-62

-65

-84

-63

-65

-69 SecurityfAdmin Bldg 375

.50

-52

.55

-54

-52

-52

-54 SNF Pad 895

.57

-60

-63

-62

-61

-62

• 65 Protected Area 1662

-62

-66

-68

-68

-67

-69

-75 BJU Alarms Max 895

.57

-60

-63

-62

-61

-62

.55 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level Max Sound Pressure Level General Earthwork 41 45 41 43 53 42 33 45 49 45 47 50 46 37 Cask Building 46 49 45 48 57 48 41 49 53 49 52 56 52 45 SecurityfAdmin Bldg 54 60 56 59 68 60 56 58 64 59 63 67 84 60 SNF Pad 44 48 44 47 58 47 41 48 52 48 51 55 51 46 Protected Area 38 41 37 40 50 38 30 42 45 41 44 47 42 34 B/U Alarms Max 74 LPAEO 70.9 55 61 56 59 69 61 57 59 64 60 63 75 64 60 LON (TX. Summer) 69.9 LPAMAX 75.9 PHASES 2*8 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 101 108 I

106 108 119 I

108 106 105 I

1i 2 111 113 I

115 113 111 Protected Area 1175 11 75 100 107 105 107 117 107 105 104 111 109 111 1 4 111 109 8/U Alarms Max 975 725 131 Divergence Distance SNF Pad (use #2}

1215

-59

-60

-61

-61

-62

-64

-68 Protected Area 1662

-62

-66

-68

-68

-67

-69

.75 8/U Alarms Max 1215

.59

-60

-61

-61

-62

-64

-68 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level Max Sound Pressure Level SNF Pad (use #2) 41 47 45 47 56 45 38 46 52 50 51 53 49 42 Protected Area 38 41 37 40 50 38 30 42 45 41 44 47 42 34 8/U Alarms Max 67 LPAEQ 58.8 43 48 46 48 57 45 38 47 52 50 52 67 50 43 LON (TX. Summer) 57.8 LPAMAX 67.5 page 24 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-12: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #5 (LSA Pad NE Corner)

Receptor N

E NSAS

.,,so 1075 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA E

63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 General Earthwork 1175 1175 103 I

110 109 111 I

121 111 I

109 107 114 113 115 11 8 115 113 cask Building 100 1150 105 I

112 110 112 I

120 112 I

110 108 115 114 116 119 116 114 Security/Admin Bldg 375 0

105 1 2 H O 112 120 112 110 108 115 114 116 119 1'6 1 4 SNF Pad 525 725 101 108 106 108 11 9 108 106 105 112 111 113 115 113 111 Protected Area 1175 H 75 100 107 105 107 117 107 105 104 111 109 111 114 111 109 BIU Alarms Max 525 725 134 Oivorgonco Distance General Earthwork 2327

-65

-69

-71

-71

-71

-74

-63 Cask Building 1252

-60

-63

-66

-65

-64

-66

-70 Security/Admin Bldg 1866

• 63

-67

• 69

-69

-69

-71

-78 SNF Pad 1711

• 62

-66

• 68

-68

-68

• 70

• 76 Protected Area 2327

-65

-69

-71

-71

-71

-74

-63 BIU Alarms Max 1711

-62

-66

-68

-68

-68

-70

-76 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level Max Sound Pressure Level General Earthwork 39 41 38 40 49 37 26 43 45 42 44 46 41 30 Cask Building 45 49 45 47 56 47 40 49 52 49 51 55 51 44 Security/Admin Bklg 42 45 41 44 52 41 32 46 48 45 47 50 45 38 SNF Pad 39 42 38 40 51 39 30 43 46 42 45 48 43 35 Protected Area 35 37 34 36 46 33 22 39 41 38 40 43 37 26 B/U Alarms Max 67 LPA EO 61.0 48 51 48 50 59 49 41 52 55 52 54 67 53 45 LON {TX. Summer) 60.0 LPAMAX 68.0 PHASES 2-8 Continuous Sound Powor Level Max Sound Power Lovol LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 101 I

108 106 108 I

119 108 I

106 105 112 I

111 113 I

115 113 111 I

Protected Area 1175 1175 100 I

107 105 107 I

117 107 I

105 104 111 I

109 111 114 111 109 I

BIU Alarms Max 975 725 I

I 131 I

Olvorgonco Distance SNF Pad (use #2) 2154

-64 I

-65

-66

-67 I

-69

-72 I

-60 Protected Area 2327

-65 I

-69

-71

-71 I

-71

-74 I

-63 B/U Alarms Max 2154

-64 I

-65

-66

-67 I

-69

-72 I

-60 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level Max Sound Pressure Level SNF Pad (use #2) 37 42 40 42 50 37 27 41 47 45 46 I

47 41 31 Protected Area 35 I

37 34 36 I

46 33 I

22 39 41 I

38 40 43 37 26 I

BIU Alarms Max I

I I

I 62 I

LPAEO 53.2 39 43 41 43 51 38 28 43 48 46 47 62 43 32 LON (TX, Summer) 52.2 LPAMAX 62.8 Table A-13: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #6 (Residential, near 176 & 18)

Receptor N

E NSA6

-6225

-19675 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 General Earthwork 1175 1175 103 110 109 11 12 111 109 107 114 113 1 5 1 8 115 113 Cask Building 100 1150 105 I

112 110 I

112 120 I

112 110 108 115 114 116 119 116 114 Security/Admin Bldg 375 0

105 I

112 110 I

112 120 I

112 110 108 115 114 116 119 116 114 SNF Pad 525 725 101 I

108 106 I

108 119 I

108 106 105 112 111 113 11 5 113 111 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 107 117 107 105 104 111 109 11 114 111 109 BIU Alanns Max 525 725 134 Divergence Distance General EarthwOtk 22 24

-84

-91

-97

-108

-128

-159

-241 Cask Building 21764

-84

-91

-97

-108

-127

-158

-238 Security/Admin Bldg 20752

-84

• 90

-96

-107

-125

-154

-231 SNF Pad 21488

-84

-91

-96

-107

-127

-157

-236 Protected Area 22 24

• 84

-91

-97

-108

• 128

• 159

• 241 B/U Alarms Max 21488

-64

-91

-96

-107

-127

-157

-236 LPA Continuous Sound Prossuro Level Max Sound Pressure Level General Earthwork 19 19 12 3

-8

-48

-132 23 23 16 7

-10

-44

-128 Cask Building 20 21 14 5

.7

-45

-128 24 24 17 8

-9

• 42

-125 Security/Admin Bldg 21 21 14 6

-5

-42

-121 25 25 18 10

-6

-38

-117 SNF Pad 17 17 10 1

-8

-48

-130 21 21 14 5

-11

.44

-126 Protected Area 15 16 8

-1

-11

-52

-136 19 20 12 3

• 14

-48

• 132 B/U Alarms Max 8

LPAEO 29.5 26 26 19 10 0

-39

-119 30 30 23 14 8

-35

-116 LON (NM. Summer) 30.2 LPAMAX 33.5 PHASES2*8 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 101 108 106 108 1 9 108 106 105 112 111 113 115 113 111 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 I

107 105 I

107 117 I

107 105 104 111 I

109 111 I

114 111 I

109 BIU Alarms Max 975 725 I

I 131 I

Dlvorgonco Distance SNF Pad (use #2) 21633

-84

• 87

-92

-104

-1 25

-156

-236 Protected Area 22124

-64

-91

-97

-108

-128

-159

-241 BILI Alanns Max 21633

-84 I

-87

-92 I

• 104

-125 I *156

• 236 LPA Continuous Sound Prossuro Lovol Max Sound Pressure Level SNF Pad {use #2) 17 21 14 4

-6

-47

-130 21 25 19 9

• 10

-43

• 125 Protected Area 15 16 8

-1

-11

-52

-136 19 20 12 3

-14

-48

-132 B/U Alanns Max 6

LPAEO 24.3 19 22 15 6

-5

-46

• 129 23 26 20 10 6

-42

• 124 LON (NM. Summer) 25.0 LPAMAX 28.6 page 25 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-14: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #7 (Residential, south of 176 & 18)

Receptor N

E NSA 7

• 8625

• 20175 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 General Earthwork 1 75 1175 103 1 0 109 111 12 11 109 107 114 1 3 115 118 115 1 3 Cask Building 100 1150 105 112 110 112 120 112 110 108 115 114 116 119 116 114 Security/Admin Bldg 375 0

105 112 1 0 112 120 112 110 108 1 5 114 1 6 119 116 114 SNF Pad 525 725 I

101 108 I

106 108 119 108 I

106 105 112 111 113 115 113 111 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 107 117 107 I

105 104 111 109 111 114 111 109 BIU Alanns Max 525 725 134 Divorgonce Distance General Earthwork 23492

• 85

• 92

• 98

-110

-131

• 164

-251 Cask Building 23041

-85

-92

-97

-109

-130

-163

-248 Security/Admin Bldg 22091

-84

-91

.97

-108

-128

-159

-241 SNF Pad 22815

• 85

• 91

.97

-109

-130

• 162

• 246 Protected Area 23492

-85

-92

-98

-110

-131

-164

-251 BIU Alarms Max 22815

-85

• 91

.97

-109

-130

• 162

• 246 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level Max Sound Pressure Level General Earthwolk 18 19 11 1

• 11

.53

• 142 22 23 15 5

-14

.49

-138 Cask Building 20 20 13 3

-10

-50

-138 24 24 17 7

-46

-134 Security/Admin Bldg 20 20 13 4

-8

-47

-131 24 24 17 8

• 9

.43

-127 SNF Pad 16 16 9

• 1

.53

-140 20 21 13 4

• 14

-49

• 138 Protected Area 15 15 8

-3

-14

-57

-146 19 19 12 1

-17

-53

-142 BJU Alanns Max 5

LPAEQ 28.9 25 26 18 9

-3

-44

• 129 29 29 22 12 5

-40

• 125 LON (NM. Summer) 29.6 LPAMAX 32.8 PHASES2-8 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 10 108 106 108 119 108 106 105 112 11 1 3 115 113 11 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 107 117 107 105 104 111 109 111 114 111 109 BIU Alanns Max 975 725 131 Divergence Distance SNF Pad (use #2) 22999

-85

-88 I

-93

-106

-128

-161 I -246 Protected Area 23492

-85

-92

• 98

• 110

-131

-164

• 251 BJU Alarms Max 22999

-85

-88

-93

-106

-128

-161

-246 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level Max Sound Pressure Level SNF Pad (use #2) 16 20 13 3

-10

.52 I -140 20 24 18 7

-13

-48

-135 Protected Area 15 15 I

8

.3

• 14

.57 I -146 19 19 12 I

1

. 17

.53

-142 I

BJU Alarms Max 3

LPAEQ 23.6 18 21 14 4

-6

-51

-139 23 25 19 8

3

-47

-134 LDN (NM. Summer) 24.3 LPAMAX 27.9 Table A-15: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #8 (Residential, NE corner of Eunice)

Receptor N

E NSA 8

-3525

-2noo PHASE1 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 General Earthwork 1175 1175 103 110 109 I

111 121 I

111 109 107 114 113 115 118 115 113 Cask Building 100 1i 50 105 1 2 110 112 120 112 110 108 115 114 116 119 116 114 Security/Admin Bldg 375 0

105 112 110 112 120 112 110 108 115 114 116 119 116 114 SNF Pad 525 725 101 108 106 108 119 108 106 105 112 111 113 1 5 113 111 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 I

107 117 I

107 105 104 111 109 111 114 111 109 B/U Alarms Max 525 725 134 Divergence Distance General Earthwork 29255

-87

.94

-102

-117

-144

-185

-294 Cask Building 29077

-87

.94

-101

-117

-144

• 185

• 292 Security/Admin Bldg 27973

-87

-94

-101

-116

-141

-181

-284 SNF Pad 28712

-87

.94

-101

-11 6

-143

-183

-290 Protected Area 29255

-87

.94

• 102

-117

• 144

• 185

• 294 B/U Alarms Max 28712

-87

.94

-101

-11 6

-143

-183

-290 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Level Max Sound Pressure Level General Earthwork 16 16 7

-6

-24

-74

-185 20 20 11

-2

-26

-70

-181 Cask Building 18 17 9

.5

-23

-72

-182 21 21 13

-1

-25

-68

-176 Security/Admin Bldg 18 18 10

.3

• 21

-68

.174 22 22 13 1

• 22

-64

-170 SNF Pad 14 14 5

-8

-24

.75

• 183 18 18 10

-4

-27

-70

-179 Protected Area 13 12 4

-10

-27

-78

-188 17 16 8

-6

-30

-74

-184 B/U Alanns Max

.9 LPAEQ 26.4 23 23 14 1

• 16

-65

.173 27 27 18 5

-6

-61

• 169 LON (NM. Summer) 27.1 LPAMAX 30.3 PHASES 2*8 Continuous Sound Power Level Max Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 101 108 106 108 119 108 106 105 1 2 111 113 1 5 113 111 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 I

107 117 I

107 105 104 111 109 I

111 114 I

111 109 B/U Alarms Max 975 725 I

131 I

Divergence Distance SNF Pad (use #2) 28779

-87

-90

-97

-113

-141

-182

-288 Protected Area 29255

-87

.94

-102 I *117

-144 I *185

• 294 B/U Alarms Max 28779

-87

-90

-97 I -113

-141 I -182

-288 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure Lovet Max Sound Pressure Level SNF Pad {use #2) 14 18 10

-4

-22

-73

-182 18 22 14 0

-26

-69

• 178 Protected Area 13 12 4

I

-10

-27 I

-78

-188 17 16 8

I

-6

-30 I

-74

-184 B/U Alarms Max I

I I

• 10 I

LPAEQ 21.1 16 19 11

-3

• 21

• 72

• 181 21 23 15 1

• 10

-68

-1n LON (NM. Summer) 21.8 LPAMAX 25.4 page 26 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-16: Construction Sound Levels, NSA #9 (Residential, 176@ TXNM RR)

Rocoptor N

E NSA9

-6075

-25160 PHASE 1 Continuous Sound Powor Lovol LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 General Earthwork 1175 1175 103 110 109 111 121 111 109 107 Cask Building 100 1150 105 112 110 112 120 112 110 108 Security/Admin Bldg 375 0

105 112 110 112 120 112 110 108 SNF Pad 525 725 101 108 106 108 119 108 106 105 Protected Area 1175 1175 100 107 105 107 117 107 105 104 BIU Alarms Max 525 725 Divorgonco Distance General Earthwork 273 5

-86

.93

-100

• 115

-140

-178

-279 Gask Building 27025

• 86

.93

-100

• 114

• 139

-1n

-2n Security/Admin Bldg 25974

-86

.93

.99

-113

• 137

.173

-270 SNF Pad 26713

-86

.93

-100

-11 4

-138

-176

-275 Protected Area 27315

• 86

.93

• 100

• 115

• 140

-178

• 279 BJU Alarms Max 26713

• 86

.93

• 100

• 114

• 138

• 176

• 275 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure lovol General Earthwork 17 17 9

-4

• 19

• 67

• 171 21 Cask Building 18 18 10

• 2

-1 9

-65

-167 22 Security/Admin Bldg 19 19 11

• 1

.17

-61

-159 23 SNF Pad 15 14 6

-6

• 20

-68

• 169 19 Protected Area 13 13 5

.7

-22

-71

. 174 17 BIU Alanns Max LPA EO 27.2 24 24 16 4

-12

-58

-158 28 LON (NM. Summer) 27.9 LPAMAX 31.1 PHASES 2*8 Continuous Sound Power Level LWA N

E 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 SNF Pad (use #2) 975 725 I

101 108 106 I

108 119 108 I

106 105 Protected Area 1175 1175 I 100 107 105 I

107 117 107 I

105 104 B/U Alarms Max 975 725 Divorgonco Distance SNF Pad (use #2) 26828 I

-86

-89

.95 I -111

-137

. 175 I -274 Protected Area 27315 I

-86

.93

-100 I *115

• 1 40

-178 I *279 BJU Alarms Max 26828 I

• 86

• 89

.95 I *111

• 137

• 175 I *274 LPA Continuous Sound Pressure lovol SNF Pad (use #2)

I 14 18 11 I

• 2

• 18

• 66 I *168 19 Protected Area I

13 13 5

I

.7

-22

-71 I -1 74 17 B/U Alarms Max I

I I

LPA EO 21.9 17 19 12

• 1

.17

-65

-167 21 LON (NM. Summer) 22.6 LPAMAX 26.2 Table A-17: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #1 (Urenco)

Receptor N

E NSA 1

-4 725

-4050 PHASE 1 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp 310 935 B/U Alam,s Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Security Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train In at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Alanns Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 7094 7085 7085 7094 6512 825 825 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U AJanns Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPAEQ LON (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 41.1 41.4 75.3 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 86 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-74

-80

-74

-80

.74

-80

-74

-80

.73

.79

-56

-59

-56

-59 23 24 22 23 12 14

-9

-10 25 25 25 25 30 31 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 103 105 107 105 103 101 102 104 106 104 102 101 115 102 108 112 110 102 86 82 83 79 78 75 64 19 32 34 19 4

108 19 32 34 19 4

108

-82

-85

-90

-100

-126

-82

-85

-90

-100

-126

-82

-85

-90

-100

-126

-82

-85

-90

-100

-126

-81

-84

-88

-97

-121

-62

-61

-60

-61

-64

-62

-61

-60

-61

-64 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 21 20 18 5

-23 27 20 19 17 4

-24 27 25 20 23 22 10

-24 12 1

-1

-9

-19

-46

-9 19 32 34 19 4

52 19 32 34 19 4

52 27 36 38 23 8

52 page 27 of34 Max Sound Powor Leval 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 114 113 115 1 8 115 113 115 114 116 1 9 116 114 115 114 116 1 9 116 114 112 111 113 1 5 113 111 111 109 111 1 4 111 109 134 Max Sound Pressure Lovol 21 13 0

• 22

• 63

• 167 22 14 2

-20

-61

-163 23 15 3

-1 8

.57

-156 19 11

• 1

• 23

-63

• 164 17 9

.3

-26

-67

-170

-4 28 20 8

-4

.54

• 154 Max Sound Power Level 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 112 I

111 I

113 115 113 I

111 111 I

109 I

111 114 111 I

109 I

I 131 I

Max Sound Pressure Lovol 23 I

15 I

2

• 21

• 62 I *163 17 I

9 I

.3

-26

-67 I -170 I

I

-6 I

24 16 3

-6

-61

• 163 Max Sound Power Level 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 108 107 109 111 109 107 108 107 109 111 109 107 128 94 102 108 112 110 102 69 82 83 79 78 75 112 119 132 133 115 101 112 119 132 133 115 101 Max Sound Pressure Level 28 25 24 22 g

-19 28 25 24 22 9

-19 38 14 20 23 22 10

-24

-10 1

-1

-9

-19

-46 53 57 71 73 54 37 53 57 71 73 54 37 53 57 71 73 54 37

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Table A-18: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #2 (Sundance)

Receptor NSA2 PHASE 1 N

E

.500

-4050 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage ModelTransp, 310 935 B/U Alam,s Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Security Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train In at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Alam,s Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 5235 5050 5050 5235 4143 1600 2600 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPAEQ LDN (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 39.6 39.9 68.6 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 66 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-71

.77

-71

.77

-71

.77

-71

.77

-69

.75

-62

-65

-66

-70 26 27 25 26 15 17

-5

-6 21 21 16 16 30 31 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 103 105 107 105 103 101 106 102 104 106 104 102 101 106 115 102 106 112 110 102 66 94 62 63 79 76 75 64 69 19 32 34 19 4

106 112 19 32 34 19 4

106 112

.79

-81

-84

-91

-110

.79

-80

-63

-90

-109

.79

-80

-83

.90

-109

.79

-81

-64

-91

-110

.77

-76

-80

-85

-101

-66

-67

-67

-69

.75

.72

.72

-73

-76

-86 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 24 24 24 14

-8 30 31 23 24 23 14

.7 30 31 32 23 27 26 19

-8 15 17 5

5

• 1

.7

-26

-5

-6 15 26 30 15 0

47 47 12 25 27 12

-3 43 42 28 33 36 23 5

47 47 Table A-19: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #3 (Permian)

Receptor NSA3 PHASE 1 N

925 E

-4050 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp 310 935 B/U Alamis Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Secunly Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train ln at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Alam,s Max Cask Building Secunly Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 5265 5023 5023 5265 4067 2600 4050 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U Alamis Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPAEQ LON (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 36.6 39.1 63.1 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 66 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-71

.77

-71

.77

-71

.77

-71

-77

-69

.75

-66

-70

-69

.75 26 27 25 26 15 17

.5

-6 16 16 15 15 29 30 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 63 125 103 105 107 105 103 101 106 102 104 106 104 102 101 106 115 102 106 112 110 102 66 94 62 63 79 76 75 64 69 19 32 34 19 4

106 112 19 32 34 19 4

106 112

-79

-81

-84

-91

-111

.79

-80

-83

.90

-106

.79

-80

-83

.90

-106

-79

-81

-84

-91

-111

-76

.77

.79

-85

-100

.72

.72

.73

-76

-86

-76

.77

.79

-85

-100 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 24 24 24 14

-8 30 31 23 24 23 14

-7 30 31 32 23 27 26 19

-8 15 17 6

5 0

-7

-25

.5

-6 12 25 27 12

-3 43 42 9

22 24 9

-6 39 37 26 32 35 22 4

43 42 Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Max Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 107 109 111 109 107 107 109 111 109 107 126 102 106 112 110 102 62 63 79 76 75 119 132 133 115 101 119 132 133 115 101 Max Sound Pressure Level 26 26 26 16

-4 26 29 26 19

-2 45 23 27 26 19

-8 5

5

• 1

.7

-26 51 65 66 46 26 47 60 60 39 15 51 65 66 46 26 Max Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 107 109 111 109 107 107 109 111 109 107 126 102 106 112 110 102 62 63 79 78 75 119 132 133 115 101 119 132 133 115 101 Max Sound Pressure Level 26 26 26 18

-4 26 29 26 19

-2 45 23 27 26 19

-8 6

5 0

-7

-25 47 60 60 39 15 43 55 53 30 1

47 60 60 39 15 Table A-20: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #4 (CISF SW Corner)

Receptor NSA4 PHASE 1 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp 310 935 B/U Ala mis Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Secunly Bldg 375 0

Train Out al 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train In at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Alam,s Max Cask Building Secunly Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 1154 965 965 1154 375 100 5700 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U Alamis Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPAEQ LON (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 56.1 58.4 96.3 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 66 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

.59

-62

-56

-61

-56

-81

.59

-82

-50

-52

-36

.39

.72

-76 36 42 36 42 27 32 14 17 39 39 13 13 43 46 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 103 105 107 105 103 102 104 106 104 102 115 102 106 112 110 102 62 63 79 76 75 19 32 34 19 4

19 32 34 19 4

-65

-84

-63

-65

-69

-63

-63

-62

-63

-66

-63

-63

-62

-63

-66

-65

-84

-63

-65

-69

.55

.54

-52

-52

.54

-40

-40

.39

.39

.39

-80

-82

-85

.93

-114 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 36 41 44 40 34 36 41 45 41 35 53 37 44 49 46 33 27 29 27 26 21 33 46 48 33 18 7

20 22 7

-8 43 50 56 48 39 page 28 of34 Max Sound Power Level 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 101 106 107 109 111 109 107 101 106 107 109 111 109 107 126 66 94 102 106 112 110 102 64 69 62 63 79 78 75 106 112 119 132 133 115 101 106 112 119 132 133 115 101 Max Sound Pressure Level 42 46 42 45 46 44 36 43 47 43 46 50 46 40 66 27 32 37 44 49 46 33 14 17 27 29 27 26 21 71 73 79 92 94 76 61 36 34 39 50 47 22

-14 71 73 79 92 94 76 61

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-21: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #5 (LSA Pad NE Corner)

Receptor NSA5 PHASE 1 N

E

-1150 1075 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp 310 935 8/U Alarms Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Security Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train In at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Ala1111s Max cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 1252 1467 1467 1252 1866 1000 4650 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport 8/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 6 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPAEQ LON {NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 54.8 55.1 73.4 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 86 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-60

-63

-61

-64

-61

-64

-60

-63

-63

-67

-58

-61

-70

-76 37 41 35 39 26 31 1

2 24 24 14 14 40 43 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 103 105 107 105 102 104 106 104 115 102 108 112 110 82 83 79 78 19 32 34 19 19 32 34 19

-66

-65

-64

-66

-67

-66

-66

-68

-67

-66

-66

-68

-66

-65

-64

-66

-69

-69

-69

-71

-64

-63

-62

-63

-78

-79

-62

-88 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 37 40 43 39 35 37 41 36 49 37 43 48 45 13 14 10 7

18 31 33 18 8

21 23 8

41 46 52 46 Max Sound Power Level 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 103 101 108 107 109 111 109 102 101 108 107 109 111 109 128 102 86 94 102 108 112 110 75 64 69 82 83 79 78 4

108 112 119 132 133 115 4

108 112 119 132 133 115

-70

-73

-73

-70

-78

-67

-105 Max Sound Pressure Level 32 41 45 41 44 47 43 29 40 44 40 42 46 41 62 32 26 31 37 43 48 45

-3 1

2 13 14 10 7

3 51 51 55 69 71 52

-7 38 36 41 53 51 27 36 51 51 55 69 71 52 Table A-22: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #6 (Residential, near 176 & 18)

Receptor NSA6 PHASE 1 N

E

-6225

-19675 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp 310 935 B/U Alarms Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Security Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train ln at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Secunty Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 21764 21621 21621 21764 20752 2640 2640 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train Jn, 8 hr avg LPA EQ LDN (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 33.0 33.3 62.9 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 86 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-64

-91

-84

-91

-84

-91

-84

-91

-64

-90

-66

-71

-66

-71 13 13 12 12 2

3

-19

-21 18 18 18 18 22 22 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 103 105 107 105 102 104 106 104 115 102 108 112 110 82 83 79 78 19 32 34 19 19 32 34 19

-97

-108

-127

-158

-96

-108

-127

-157

-96

-108

-127

-157

-97

-108

-127

-158

-96

-107

-125

-154

-72

-72

-73

-76

-72

-72

-73

-76 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 6

-3

-20

-53 5

-4

-21

-54

-12 5

0

-15

-48

-14

-24

-46

-76 12 25 27 12 12 25 27 12 16 28 30 15 Max Sound Power Level 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 103 101 108 107 109 109 102 101 108 107 109 111 109 128 102 86 94 102 108 112 110 75 64 69 82 83 79 78 4

108 112 119 132 133 115 4

108 112 119 132 133 115

-238

-237

-237

-238

-231

-86

-86 Max Sound Pressure Level

-136 17 17 10 1

-16

-49

-136 17 17 10 1

-16

-48 1

-136 2

3 5

0

-15

-48

-156

-19

-21

-14

-24

-46

-76

-3 43 41 47 60 60 38

-3 43 41 47 60 60 38 3

43 41 47 60 60 38 4000 107 107 102 75 101 101 36 34 32

-3 34

-4 39 4000 107 107 102 75 101 101

-132

-131

-136

-156 15 15 15 Table A-23: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #7 (Residential, south of 176 & 18)

Receptor NSA 7 PHASE 1 N

E

-8625

-20175 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp, 310 935 B/U Alarms Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Security Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train In at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp, B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train ln, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 23041 22923 22923 23041 22091 5575 5575 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA EQ LON (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 28.5 28.8 52.8 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 86 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-85

-92

-85

-91

-85

-91

-85

-92

-84

-91

-72

-78

-72

-78 12 13 11 12 1

2

-20

-22 13 13 13 13 19 19 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 4000 103 105 107 105 103 102 104 106 104 102 115 102 108 112 110 102 82 83 79 78 75 19 32 34 19 4

19 32 34 19 4

-97

-109

-130

-163

-248

-97

-109

-130

-162

-247

-97

-109

-130

-162

-247

-97

-109

-130

-163

-248

-97

-108

-128

-159

-241

-80

-82

-85

-93

-113

-80

-82

-85

-93

-113 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 5

-5

-23

-58

-145 4

-6

-24

-58

-146

-15 5

-1

-18

-53

-146

-15

-25

-49

-81

-166 7

20 22 7

-8 7

20 22 7

-8 13 23 25 10 1

page 29 of34 Max Sound Power Level 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 101 108 107 109 111 109 107 101 108 107 109 111 109 107 128 86 94 102 108 112 110 102 64 69 82 83 79 78 75 108 112 119 132 133 115 101 108 112 119 132 133 115 101 Max Sound Pressure Level 16 17 9

-1

-19

-54

-141 16 17 9

0

-18

-53

-140

-2 1

2 5

-1

-18

-53

-146

-20

-22

-15

-25

-49

-81

-166 36 34 39 51 48 22

-12 36 34 39 51 48 22

-12 36 34 39 51 48 22 0

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-24: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #8 (Residential, NE corner of Eunice)

Receptor NSA8 PHASE 1 N

E

-3525

• 27700 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp 310 935 B/U Alarms Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Security Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train In at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 29077 28891 28891 29077 27973 2150 2150 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPAEQ LON (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 34.2 34.5 65.3 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 86 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-87

-94

-87

-94

-87

-94

-87

-94

-87

-94

-64

-68

-64

-68 10 10 9

9

-1 0

-22

-25 19 19 19 19 23 23 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 103 105 107 105 102 104 106 104 115 102 108 112 110 82 83 79 78 19 32 34 19 19 32 34 19

-101

-117

-144

-185

-101

-117

-143

-184

-101

-117

-143

-184

-101

-117

-144

-185

-101

-116

-141

-181

-70

-70

-70

-73

-70

-70

-70

-73 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 1

-12

-36

-80 0

-13

-37

-80

-28 1

-9

-32

-75

-19

-33

-62

-103 13 26 28 13 13 26 28 13 17 29 31 16 Max Sound Power Level 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 103 101 108 107 109 111 109 102 101 108 107 109 111 109 128 102 86 94 102 108 112 110 75 64 69 82 83 79 78 4

108 112 119 132 133 115 4

108 112 119 132 133 115

-292

-291

-291

-292

-284

-81

-81 Max Sound Pressure Level

-190 14 14 5

-8

-32

-76

-189 14 14 5

-8

-32

-75

-15

-190

-1 0

1

-9

-32

-75

-209

-22

-25

-19

-33

-62

-103

-2 45 44 49 62 62 42

-2 45 44 49 62 62 42 4

45 44 49 62 62 42 Table A-25: Operational Sound Levels, NSA #9 (Residential, 176 @ TXNM RR)

Receptor N

E NSA 9

-6075

-25160 PHASE 1 LWA N

E Storage Model Const 100 1150 Storage Model Transp 310 935 B/U Alarms Max 310 935 Cask Building 100 1150 Security Bldg 375 0

Train Out at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Train In at 825 ft, 8 hr avg Divergence Storage Model Const Storage Model Transp B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPA Distance 27025 26865 26865 27025 25974 2640 2640 Storage Model Const Storage Model Transport B/U Alarms Max Cask Building Security Bldg Train Out, 8 hr avg Train In, 8 hr avg LPAEQ LON (NM. Summer)

LPAMAX 32.9 33.2 62.9 ft 63 125 97 104 96 103 86 94 64 69 25 25 25 25

-86

-93

-86

-93

-86

-93

-86

-93

-86

-93

-66

-71

-66

-71 11 11 10 10 0

1

-22

-24 18 18 18 18 22 22 Continuous Sound Power Level 250 500 1000 2000 103 105 107 105 102 104 106 104 115 102 108 112 110 82 83 79 78 19 32 34 19 19 32 34 19

-100

-114

-139

-177

-100

-114

-139

-177

-100

-114

-139

-177

-100

-114

-139

-177

-99

-113

-137

-173

-72

-72

-73

-76

-72

-72

-73

-76 Continuous Sound Pressure Level 3

-10

-32

-72 2

-10

-32

-73

-24 2

-6

-27

-67

-17

-30

-58

-95 12 25 27 12 12 25 27 12 16 28 30 15 Max Sound Power Level 4000 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 103 101 108 107 109 111 109 102 101 108 107 109 111 109 128 102 86 94 102 108 112 110 75 64 69 82 83 79 78 4

108 112 119 132 133 115 4

108 112 119 132 133 115

-277

-276

-276

-277

-270

-86

-86 Max Sound Pressure Level

-175 15 15 7

-6

-28

-68

-175 15 15 7

-5

-27

-68

-11

-175 0

1 2

-6

-27

-67

-195

-22

-24

-17

-30

-58

-95

-3 43 41 47 60 60 38

-3 43 41 47 60 60 38 3

43 41 47 60 60 38 Table A-26: Personnel TWA, General Earthwork, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,eq w/ NC Task Description HP per Hour LwA,eq LwA,eq Divergence LpA,eq B/U Alarms Earthwork Heavy Haul Truck 350 4

118 Earthmover 500 2

113 Backup Alarms 6

123 General Earthwork Subtotal 124

-43 81 76 Adjacent Const.

Cask Building 124

-61 63 60 Security/Admin Bldg 124

-56 68 65 SNF Pad 1 122

-56 66 61 Protected Area 121

-43 78 73 General Earthwork Total 83 78 page 30 of34 4000 107 107 102 75 101 101

-186

-184

-190

-209 20 20 20 4000 107 107 102 75 101 101

• 171

-170

-175

-195 15 15 15

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-27: Personnel TWA, Cask Building, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,eqw/ NC Task Descri tion HP er Hour LwA,e LwA,e Diver ence L A,e B/UAlarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 1

110 Backup Alarms 1

115 Support Air Compressor 1

108 Diesel Generator 1

111 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

107 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

113 Backup Alarms 2

118 Construction Construction Eq 400 2

117 Welding 4

107 Grinding 4

104 Backu Alarms 2

118 Cask Building Subtotal 124

-32 92 89 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 124

-61 63 59 Security/Admin Bldg 124

-59 68 65 SNF Pad 1 122

-53 66 61 Protected Area 121

-61 78 73 Cask Building Total 92 89 Table A-28: Personnel TWA, Security/Admin Building, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,eqw/ NC Task Descri tion HP er Hour LwA,e LwA,e Diver ence L A,e B/U Alarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 1

110 Backup Alarms 1

115 Support Air Compressor 1

108 Diesel Generator 1

111 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

107 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

113 Backup Alarms 2

118 Construction Construction Eq 400 2

117 Welding 4

107 Grinding 4

104 Backup Alarms 2

118 Security/Admin Subtotal 124

-30 94 91 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 124

-56 63 59 Cask Building 124

.59 68 65 SNF Pad 1 122

-55 66 61 Protected Area 121

-56 78 73 Security/Admin Building Total 94 91 Table A-29: Personnel TWA, SNF Pad 1, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,eqw/ NC Task Descri tion HP er Hour LwA,e LwA,e Diver ence L A,e B/U Alarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 2

113 Backup Alarms 2

118 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

107 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

113 Backup Alarms 2

118 SNF Pad 1 Subtotal 122

-35 87 83 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 124

-56 68 64 Cask Building 124

-53 71 67 Security/Admin Building 124

-55 69 66 Protected Area 121

-56 65 60 SNF Pad 1 Total 88 83 Table A-30: Personnel TWA, Protected Area, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,eqw/NC Task Description HP per Hour LwA,e LwA,e Diver ence L A,eq B/UAlarms Earthwork Heavy Haul Truck 350 1

112 Earthmover 500 2

113 Backu Alarms 3

120 Protected Area Subtotal 121

-43 78 73 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 124

-43 81 76 Cask Building 124

-61 63 60 Security/Admin Building 124

-56 68 65 SNF Pad 1 122

-56 66 61 Protected Area Total 83 78 page 31 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Table A-31: Personnel TWA, Storage Module Construction Quantity Item Eff. Dist.

Task Description Location er Hour LwA,e fl Diver ence Operations Storage Module Construction Working 1

113 25

-26 Backup Alarm Working 1

115 25

-26 Storage Module Transport Pad 1 1

112

-53 Backup Alarm Pad 1 1

115

-53 Gask Building Vent Fans Cask Bldg 8

116 50

-32 Security Bldg RTUs Sec/Admin 3

97

-59 Train Inbound 82 200

-35 Train Outbound 82 5250

-56 Storage Module Construction Crew Total Table A-32: Personnel TWA, Storage Module Transport Quantity Item Eff. Dist.

Task Descri tion Location er Hour LwA,e fl Diver ence Operations Storage Module Construction Cask Bldg 1

113

-53 Backup Alarm Cask Bldg 1

115

-53 Storage Module Transport Working 1

112 12

-22 Backup Alarm Working 0

0 Cask Building Vent Fans Cask Bldg 8

116

-53 Security Bldg RTUs Sec/Admin 3

97

-55 Train Inbound 82 425

-39 Train Outbound 82 5000

-55 Storage Module Transport Operations Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 LpA,eqw/ NC L A,e B/UAlarms 87 87 89 79 58 58 61 51 84 84 37 37 47 47 26 26 92 89 LpA,eqw/ NC L A,e B/UAlarms 59 59 61 51 89 89 0

0 62 62 42 42 43 43 27 27 89 89 Table A-33: Personnel TWA, SNF Pads, Phase 2-8 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,eqw/ NC Task Description HP per Hour LwA,eq LwA,eq Diver ence LpA,e B/U Alarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 2

113 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

107 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

113 All Backu Alarms 4

121 SNF Pad 2-8 Subtotal 122

-35 87 81 Adjacent Const.

Protected Area 121

-53 68 63 Operations Storage Model Construction 400 1

113

-57 55 55 Backup Alarm 1

115

-57 57 47 Storage Module Transport 350 1

112

-53 59 59 Backup Alarm 1

115

-53 61 51 Cask Building Vent Fans 8

116

-57 58 58 Security Bldg RTUs 3

97

-57 39 39 Train Inbound, Pad 5 82

-39 43 43 Train Outboud, Pad 5 82

-55 27 27 SNF Pad 2-8 Total 87 81 Table A-34: Personnel TWA, Protected Area, Phase 2-8 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,eqw/ NC Task Oescri tion HP er Hour LwA,e LwA,e Diver ence L A,e B/UAlarms Earthwork Heavy Haul Truck 350 1

112 Earthmover 500 2

113 Backup Alarms 3

120 Protected Area Subtotal 121

-43 78 73 Adjacent Const.

SNF Pad 2 122

-53 68 62 Operations Storage Module Construction 400 1

113

-61 52 52 Backup Alarm 1

115

-61 54 44 Storage Module Transport 350 1

112

-56 55 55 Backup Alarm 1

115

-56 58 48 Cask Building Vent Fans 8

116

-61 55 55 Security Bldg RTUs 3

97

-56 41 41 Train Inbound, PA Center 82

-45 37 37 Train Outbound, PA Center 82

-57 25 25 Protected Area Total 78 73 Table A-35: Personnel LpA,max, General Earthwork, Phase 2-8 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,max w/ NC Task Description HP per Hour LwA,max LwA,max Divergence LpA,max B/UAlarms Earthwork Heavy Haul Truck 350 4

122 Earthmover 500 2

117 Backu Alarms 3

129 General Earthwork Subtotal 130

-43 87 81 Adjacent Const.

Gask Building 131

-61 70 64 Security/Admin Bldg 131

-56 75 69 SNF Pad 1 130

-56 74 67 Protected Area 128

-43 85 78 General Earthwork Total 89 83 page 32 of34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 Table A-36: Personnel LpA,max, Cask Building, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,max w/ NC Task Oescri tion HP er Hour LwA,max LwA,max Diver ence L A,max B/UAlarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 1

114 Support Air Compressor 1

112 Diesel Generator 1

114 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

114 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

117 Construction Construction Eq 400 2

120 Welding 4

111 Grinding 4

111 All Backu Alanms 3

129 Cask Building Subtotal 131

-32 99 93 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 130

-61 69 64 Security/Admin Bldg 131

-59 75 69 SNF Pad 1 130

-53 74 67 Protected Area 128

-61 85 78 Cask Building Total 99 93 Table A-37: Personnel LpA,max, Security/Admin Building, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,max w/ NC Task Descrl tion HP er Hour LwA,max LwA,max Diver ence L A,max B/UAlarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 1

114 Support Air Compressor 1

112 Diesel Generator 1

114 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

114 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

117 Construction Construction Eq 400 2

120 Welding 4

111 Grinding 4

111 All Backu Aianms 3

129 Security/Admin Subtotal 131

-30 100 95 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 130

-56 69 64 Cask Building 131

-59 75 69 SNF Pad 1 130

-55 74 67 Protected Area 128

-56 85 78 Security/Admin Building Total 100 95 Table A-38: Personnel LpA,max, SNF Pad 1, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,max w/ NC Task Descri tlon HP rHour LwA,max LwA,max Diver ence L A,max B/UAlarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 2

117 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

114 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

117 All Backu Aianms 3

129 SNF Pad 1 Subtotal 130

-35 95 89 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 131

-56 74 69 Cask Building 131

-53 77 72 Security/Admin Building 131

-55 75 70 Protected Area 128

-56 72 65 SNF Pad 1 Total 96 89 Table A-39: Personnel LpA,max, Protected Area, Phase 1 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,max w/ NC Task Oescrl tion HP rHour LwAmax LwA,max Diver ence L A,max B/UAlarms Earthwork Heavy Haul Truck 350 1

116 Earthmover 500 2

117 Backu Alanms 2

128 Protected Area Subtotal 128

-43 85 78 Adjacent Const.

Gen'I Earthwork 130

-43 87 81 Cask Building 131

-61 70 64 Security/Admin Building 131

-56 75 69 SNF Pad 1 130

-56 74 67 Protected Area Total 89 83 Table A-40: Personnel LpA,max, Storage Module Construction Quantity Item Elf. Dist.

LpA,max w/ NC Task Descrl tlon Location er Hour LwA,max fl Diver ence L A,max B/U Alarms Operations Storage Module Construction Working 1

117 20

-24 93 93 Backup Alanm Working 1

125 20

-24 101 91 Storage Module Transport Pad 1 1

117

-53 63 63 Backup Alanm Pad 1 1

125

-53 71 61 Cask Building Vent Fans Cask Bldg 8

116 50

-32 84 84 Security Bldg RTUs Sec/Admin 3

97

-59 37 37 Train Inbound 131 200

-35 97 47 Train Outbound 131 5250

-56 76 26 Storage Module Construction Crew Total 103 95 page 33 of 34

Report No. Rl432-0I: Cook-Joyce Inc - ISP CISF Acoustical Analysis Table A-41: Personnel LpA,max, Storage Module Transport Quantity Item Task Descri tlon Location er Hour LwA,max Operations Storage Module Construction Cask Bldg 1

117 Backup Alarm Cask Bldg 1

125 Storage Module Transport Working 1

117 10 Backup Alarm Working 0

0 Cask Building Vent Fans Cask Bldg 8

116 Security Bldg RTUs Sec/Admin 3

97 Train Inbound 131 425 Train Outbound 131 5000 Storage Module Transport Operations

-53

-55

-39

-55 Nelson Acoustics 22 August, 2019 LpA,max w/ NC L A,max B/UAlarms 63 63 71 61 96 96 0

0 62 62 42 42 92 43 76 27 97 96 Table A-42: Personnel LpA,max, SNF Pads, Phase 2-8 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,max w/ NC Task Oescri tlon HP er Hour LwA,max LwA,max Diver ence L A,max B/UAlarms Earthwork Earthmover 500 2

117 Concrete Pump Truck 400 1

114 Ready-Mix Truck 400 1

117 All Backu Alarms 3

129 SNF Pad 2-8 Subtotal 130

-35 95 87 Adjacent Const.

Protected Area 128

-53 75 69 Operations Storage Model Construction 400 1

117

-57 59 59 Backup Alarm 1

125

-57 67 57 Storage Module Transport 350 1

117

-53 63 63 Backup Alarm 1

125

-53 71 61 Cask Building Vent Fans 8

116

-57 58 58 Security Bldg RTUs 3

97

-57 39 39 Train Inbound, Pad 5 131

-39 92 43 Train Outboud, Pad 5 131

-55 76 27 SNF Pad 2-8 Total 97 88 Table A-43: Personnel LpA,max, Protected Area, Phase 2-8 Construction Quantity Item Subtotal LpA,max w/ NC Task Oescri tlon HP er Hour LwA,max LwA,max Diver ence L A,max B/UAlanms Earthwork Heavy Haul Truck 350 1

116 Earthmover 500 2

117 Backu Alarms 2

128 Protected Area Subtotal 128

-43 85 78 Adjacent Const.

SNF Pad 2 130

-53 77 69 Operations Storage Module Construction 400 117

-61 56 56 Backup Alarm 125

-61 64 54 Storage Module Transport 350 117

-56 60 60 Backup Alarm 125

-56 68 58 Cask Building Vent Fans 116

-61 55 55 Security Bldg RTUs 97

-56 41 41 Train Inbound, PA Center 131

-45 86 37 Train Outbound, PA Center 131

-57 75 25 Protected Area Total 89 79 page 34 of34