Text

Enclosure 6 - CoC 1042 Proposed Amendment 1, Revision 2, Technical Specifications
	ML18255A098
Person / Time
Site:	07201042
Issue date:	08/30/2018
From:	; Orano USA, TN Americas LLC
To:	; Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML18255A124	List: ML18255A092; ML18255A093; ML18255A094; ML18255A096; ML18255A097; ML18255A098; ML18255A101; ML18255A102;
References
	CAC 001028, CoC No. 1042, E-52372, EPID: L-2018-LLA-0043
	Download: ML18255A098 (71)
	v • d • e

Enclosure 6 to E-52372

CoC 1042 Proposed Amendment 1, Revision 2 Technical Specifications Revision 2 to Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications

CoC 1042 APPENDIX A

NUHOMS EOS SYSTEM GENERIC TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Amendment 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 ii Use and Application ................................................................................................. 1-11.0Definitions ..................................................................................................... 1-11.1Logical Connectors ....................................................................................... 1-51.2Completion Times ......................................................................................... 1-71.3Frequency

................................................................................................... 1-101.4Functional and Operating Limits

............................................................................... 2-12.0Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC ................................................... 2-12.1Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-89BTH DSC ................................................... 2-42.2Functional and Operating Limits Violations .................................................. 2-62.3Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) and Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.0Applicability .............................................................................................................. 3-1DSC Fuel Integrity ........................................................................................ 3-33.1Fuel Integrity during Drying ............................................................. 3-33.1.1DSC Helium Backfill Pressure ......................................................... 3-53.1.2Time Limit for Completion of DSC Transfer .................................... 3-73.1.3Cask Criticality Control ............................................................................... 3-103.2Soluble Boron Concentration ........................................................ 3-103.2.1Radiation Protection ................................................................................... 3-123.3DSC and TRANSFER CASK (TC) Surface Contamination ........... 3-123.3.1Design Features ....................................................................................................... 4-14.0Site ............................................................................................................... 4-14.1 4.1.1Site Location

.................................................................................... 4-1Storage System Features ............................................................................. 4-14.2 4.2.1Storage Capacity ............................................................................. 4-14.2.2Storage Pad .................................................................................... 4-1Canister Criticality Control ............................................................................ 4-14.3 4.3.1Neutron Absorber Tests .................................................................. 4-24.3.2High Strength Low Alloy Steel for Basket Structure ........................ 4-2Codes and Standards ................................................................................... 4-34.4 4.4.1HORIZONTAL STORAGE MODULE (HSM) ................................... 4-34.4.2DRY SHIELDED CANISTER (DSC) (EOS-37PTH and EOS-89BTH DSC) ................................................................................... 4-34.4.3TRANSFER CASK .......................................................................... 4-34.4.4Alternatives to Codes and Standards .............................................. 4-3Storage Location Design Features ............................................................... 4-84.5 4.5.1Storage Configuration ..................................................................... 4-84.5.2Concrete Storage Pad Properties to Limit DSC Gravitational Loadings Due to Postulated Drops

.................................................. 4-84.5.3Site Specific Parameters and Analyses .......................................... 4-8Administrative Controls ............................................................................................ 5-15.0Programs ...................................................................................................... 5-15.1 5.1.1Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ............................ 5-15.1.2Radiation Protection Program ......................................................... 5-15.1.3HSM Thermal Monitoring Program

.................................................. 5-35.1.3.1EOS-HSM Thermal Monitoring Program 5-35.1.3.2 HSM-MX Thermal Monitoring Program 5-5Lifting Controls .............................................................................................. 5-65.2 5.2.1TC/DSC Lifting Height and Temperature Limits .............................. 5-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 iii 5.2.2Cask Drop ....................................................................................... 5-7Concrete Testing .......................................................................................... 5-75.3Hydrogen Gas Monitoring

............................................................................. 5-85.4EOS-HSM Wind Deflectors .......................................................................... 5-85.5 List of Tables Table 1 Fuel Assembly Design Characteristics for the EOS-37PTH DSC ........................... T-1Table 2 Maximum Uranium Loading per FFC for Failed PWR Fuel ..................................... T-1Table 3 Co-60 Equivalent Activity for CCs Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC ........................ T-1Table 4 Maximum Planar Average Initial Enrichment for EOS-37PTH ................................ T-2Table 5 Minimum B-10 Content in the Neutron Poison Plates of the EOS-37PTH DSC ..... T-4Table 6 Fuel Assembly Design Characteristics for the EOS-89BTH DSC ........................... T-5Table 7 Deleted .................................................................................................................... T-6Table 8 Maximum Lattice Average Initial Enrichment for EOS-89BTH DSC ....................... T-6 List of Figures Figure 1A Heat Load Zone Configuration 1 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM .......................................................................................... F-1Figure 1B Heat Load Zone Configuration 2 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC108/125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM ................................................................ F-2Figure 1C Heat Load Zone Configuration 3 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC108/125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM ................................................................ F-3Figure 1D Heat Load Zone Configuration 4 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM ....................................................................... F-4Figure 1E Heat Load Zone Configuration 5 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM ....................................................................... F-5Figure 1F Heat Load Zone Configuration 6 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM ....................................................................... F-6Figure 1G Heat Load Zone Configuration 7 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the HSM-MX

.......................................................................... F-7Figure 1H Heat Load Zone Configuration 8 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the HSM-MX

.......................................................................... F-8Figure 1I Heat Load Zone Configuration 9 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the HSM-MX

.......................................................................... F-9Figure 2 EOS-89BTH DSC Heat Load Zone Configurations and Fuel Qualification ........... F-10Figure 3 Peripheral (P) and Inner (I) Fuel Locations for the EOS-37PTH DSC .................. F-12 Definitions

1.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-1 USE AND APPLICATION

1.0 Definitions

1.1 ----------------------------------------------------------- NOTE ---------------------------------------------------------- The defined terms of this section appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these Technical Specifications and Bases. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Term Definition ACTIONS ACTIONS shall be that part of a Specification that prescribes Required Actions to be taken under designated Conditions within specified Completion

Times. BLEU FUEL Blended Low Enriched Uranium (BLEU) FUEL material is identical to UO 2 fuel material except it may have an elevated cobalt impurity in the fuel matrix greater than 1g/MTU. CONTROL COMPONENTS (CCs) Authorized CCs include Burnable Poison Rod Assemblies (BPRAs), Thimble Plug Assemblies (TPAs), Control Rod Assemblies (CRAs), Control Element Assemblies (CEAs), Control Spiders, Rod Cluster Control Assemblies (RCCAs), Axial Power Shaping Rod Assemblies (APSRAs), Orifice Rod Assemblies (ORAs), Peripheral Power Suppression Assemblies (PPSAs), Vibration Suppression Inserts (VSIs), Flux Suppression Inserts (FSIs), Burnable Absorber Assemblies (BAAs), Neutron Source Assemblies (NSAs) and Neutron Sources. Non-fuel hardware that are positioned within the fuel assembly after the fuel assembly is discharged from the core such as Guide Tubes or Instrument Tube Tie Rods or Anchors, Guide Tube Inserts, BPRA Spacer Plates or devices that are positioned and operated within the fuel assembly during reactor operation such as those listed above are also considered to be authorized CCs. (continued)

Definitions

1.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-2 1.1 Definitions (continued) DAMAGED FUEL DAMAGED FUEL assemblies are PWR assemblies containing fuel rods with known or suspected cladding defects greater than hairline cracks or pinhole leaks. The extent of damage in the fuel assembly, including non-cladding damage, is to be limited so that a fuel assembly maintains its configuration for normal and off-normal conditions. DAMAGED FUEL assemblies shall also contain top and bottom end fittings. DAMAGED FUEL assemblies may also contain missing or partial fuel rods. DRY SHIELDED CANISTER (DSC) An EOS-37PTH DSC and an EOS-89BTH DSC are sealed containers that provide confinement of fuel in an inert atmosphere.

FAILED FUEL FAILED FUEL is defined as ruptured fuel rods, severed fuel rods, loose fuel pellets, fuel fragments, or fuel assemblies that may not maintain configuration for normal or off-normal conditions. FAILED FUEL may contain breached rods, grossly breached rods, or other defects such as missing or partial rods, missing grid spacers, or damaged spacers to the extent that the assembly may not maintain configuration for normal or off-normal conditions. FAILED FUEL shall be stored in a failed fuel canister (FFC). FUEL CLASS A FUEL CLASS includes fuel assemblies of the same array size for a particular type of fuel design.

For example, WEV 17x17, WEO 17x17, and ANP Advanced MK BW 17x17 fuel assemblies are part of a WE 17x17 FUEL CLASS. (continued)

All Indicated Changes are in response to both RSIs Definitions

1.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-3 1.1 Definitions (continued) HORIZONTAL STORAGE MODULE (HSM) An HSM is a reinforced concrete structure for storage of a loaded DSC at a spent fuel storage installation. Where the term "HSM" is used without distinction, this term shall apply to both the EOS-HSM and HSM-MX. The term EOS-HSM refers to the base unit for storage of a single DSC as a single piece (EOS-HSM) or as a split base (EOS-HSMS). The term MATRIX (HSM-MX) refers to the two-tiered staggered structure for storage of the DSCs. INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION (ISFSI) The facility within a perimeter fence licensed for storage of spent fuel within HSMs.

INTACT FUEL Fuel assembly with no known or suspected cladding defects in excess of pinhole leaks or hairline cracks, and with no missing rods. LOADING OPERATIONS LOADING OPERATIONS include all licensed activities on a DSC while it is being loaded with fuel assemblies. LOADING OPERATIONS begin when the first fuel assembly is placed in the DSC and end when the TC has been placed horizontal on the transfer trailer. RECONSTITUTED FUEL ASSEMBLY A RECONSTITUTED FUEL ASSEMBLY is a fuel assembly where one or more fuel rods are replaced by low enriched uranium or natural uranium fuel rods or non-fuel rods. STORAGE OPERATIONS STORAGE OPERATIONS include all licensed activities that are performed at the ISFSI, while a DSC containing fuel assemblies is located in an HSM on the storage pad within the ISFSI perimeter. STORAGE OPERATIONS do not include DSC transfer between the TC and the HSM. (continued)

Definitions

1.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-4

1.1 Definitions

(continued) TRANSFER CASK (TC) A TRANSFER CASK (TC) (EOS-TC108, EOS-TC125, EOS-TC135) consists of a licensed NUHOMS EOS System TC. The TC will be placed on a transfer trailer for movement of a DSC to the HSM. TRANSFER OPERATIONS TRANSFER OPERATIONS include all licensed activities involving the movement of a TC loaded with a DSC containing fuel assemblies.

TRANSFER OPERATIONS begin when the TC has been placed horizontal on the transfer trailer ready for TRANSFER OPERATIONS and end when the

DSC is located in an HSM on the storage pad within the ISFSI perimeter. TRANSFER OPERATIONS include DSC transfer between the TC and the HSM. UNLOADING OPERATIONS UNLOADING OPERATIONS include all licensed activities on a DSC to unload fuel assemblies.

UNLOADING OPERATIONS begin when the DSC is no longer horizontal on the transfer trailer and end when the last fuel assembly has been removed from the DSC.

Logical Connectors

1.2 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-5 1.0 USE AND APPLICATION Logical Connectors 1.2PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to explain the meaning of logical connectors. Logical connectors are used in Technical Specifications (TS) to discriminate between, and yet connect, discrete Conditions, Required Actions, Completion Times, Surveillances, and Frequencies. The only logical connectors that appear in TS are AND and OR. The physical arrangement of these connectors constitutes logical conventions with specific meanings. BACKGROUND Several levels of logic may be used to state Required Actions. These levels are identified by the placement (or nesting) of the logical connectors and by the number assigned to each Required Action. The first level of logic is identified by the first digit of the number assigned to a Required Action and the placement of the logical connector in the first level of nesting (i.e., left justified with the number of the Required Action). The successive levels of logic are identified by additional digits of the Required Action number and by successive indentions of the logical connectors. When logical connectors are used to state a Condition, Completion Time, Surveillance, or Frequency, only the first level of logic is used, and the logical connector is left justified with the statement of the Condition, Completion Time, Surveillance, or Frequency. EXAMPLES The following examples illustrate the use of logical connectors: EXAMPLE 1.2-1 ACTIONS: CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. LCO (Limiting Condition for Operation) not met. A.1 Verify- AND A.2 Restore-In this example the logical connector AND is used to indicate that when in Condition A, both Required Actions A.1 and A.2 must be completed. (continued)

Logical Connectors

1.2 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-6 1.2 Logical Connectors (continued) EXAMPLES (continued) EXAMPLE 1.2-2 ACTIONS: CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. LCO not met. A.1 Stop- OR A.2 A.2.1 Verify-AND A.2.2 A.2.2.1 Reduce- OR A.2.2.2 Perform- OR A.3 Remove-This example represents a more complicated use of logical connectors. Required Actions A.1, A.2, and A.3 are alternative choices, only one of which must be performed as indicated by the use of the logical connector OR and the left justified placement. Any one of these three Actions may be chosen. If A.2 is chosen, then both A.2.1 and A.2.2 must be performed as indicated by the logical connector AND. Required Action A.2.2 is met by performing A.2.2.1 or A.2.2.2. The indented position of the logical connector OR indicates that A.2.2.1 and A.2.2.2 are alternative choices, only one of which must be performed.

Completion Times

1.3 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-7 1.0 USE AND APPLICATION Completion Times 1.3PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to establish the Completion Time convention and to provide guidance for its use. BACKGROUND Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) specify the lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of the facility. The ACTIONS associated with an LCO state Conditions that typically describe the ways in which the requirements of the LCO are not met. Specified with each stated Condition are Required Action(s) and

Completion Times(s). DESCRIPTION The Completion Time is the amount of time allowed for completing a Required Action. It is referenced to the time of discovery of a situation (e.g., equipment or variable not within limits) that requires entering an ACTIONS Condition unless otherwise specified, providing the facility is in a specified condition stated in the Applicability of the LCO. Required Actions must be completed prior to the expiration of the specified Completion Time. An ACTIONS Condition remains in effect and the Required Actions apply until the Condition no longer exists or the facility is not within the LCO Applicability. Once a Condition has been entered, subsequent subsystems, components, or variables expressed in the Condition, discovered to be not within limits, will not result in separate entry into the Condition unless specifically stated. The Required Actions of the Condition continue to apply to each additional failure, with Completion Times based on initial entry into the Condition. EXAMPLES The following examples illustrate the use of Completion Times with different types of Conditions and Changing Conditions. EXAMPLE 1.3-1 ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. Required Action and associated

Completion Time not met. B.1 Perform Action B.1 AND B.2 Perform Action B.2 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months

36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months (continued)

Completion Times

1.3 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-8 1.3 Completion Times (continued) EXAMPLES (continued) Condition B has two Required Actions. Each Required Action has its own separate Completion Time. Each Completion Time is referenced to the time that Condition B is entered. The Required Actions of Condition B are to complete action B.1 within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months AND complete action B.2 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months . A total of 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months is allowed for completing action B.1 and a total of 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months (not 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months ) is allowed for completing action B.2 from the time that Condition B was entered. If action B.1 is completed within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months , the time allowed for completing action B.2 is the next 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months because the total time allowed for completing action B.2 is 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months . EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1.3-2 ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One system not within limit. A.1 Restore system to within limit.

7 days B. Required Action and associated

Completion Time

not met. B.1 Perform Action B.1. AND B.2 Perform Action B.2. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months

36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months When a system is determined to not meet the LCO, Condition A is entered. If the system is not restored within 7 days, Condition B is also entered and the Completion Time clocks for Required Actions B.1 and B.2 start. If the system is restored after Condition B is entered, Condition A and B are exited, and therefore, the Required Actions of Condition B may be terminated. (continued)

Completion Times

1.3 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-9 1.3 Completion Times (continued) EXAMPLES (continued) EXAMPLE 1.3-3 ACTIONS ------------------------------------------NOTE----------------------------------------------

Separate Condition entry is allowed for each component.

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. LCO not met. A.1 Restore compliance with LCO. 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months B. Required Action and associated

Completion Time

not met. B.1 Perform Action B.1. AND B.2 Perform Action B.2. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months

12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months The Note above the ACTIONS Table is a method of modifying how the Completion Time is tracked. If this method of modifying how the Completion Time is tracked was applicable only to a specific Condition, the Note would appear in that Condition rather than at the top of the ACTIONS Table.

The Note allows Condition A to be entered separately for each component, and Completion Times tracked on a per component basis.

When a component is determined to not meet the LCO, Condition A is entered and its Completion Time starts. If subsequent components are determined to not meet the LCO, Condition A is entered for each component and separate Completion Times start and are tracked for

each component.

IMMEDIATE COMPLETION

TIME When "Immediately" is used as a Completion Time, the Required Action should be pursued without delay and in a controlled manner.

Frequency

1.4 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-10 1.0 USE AND APPLICATION Frequency 1.4PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to define the proper use and application of Frequency requirements DESCRIPTION Each Surveillance Requirement (SR) has a specified Frequency in which the Surveillance must be met in order to meet the associated Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO). An understanding of the correct application of the specified Frequency is necessary for compliance with

the SR. The "specified Frequency" is referred to throughout this section and each of the Specifications of Section 3.0, Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) and Surveillance Requirement (SR) Applicability. The "specified Frequency" consists of the requirements of the Frequency column of each SR, as well as certain Notes in the Surveillance column that modify performance requirements. Situations where a Surveillance could be required (i.e., its Frequency could expire), but where it is not possible or not desired that it be performed until sometime after the associated LCO is within its Applicability, represent potential SR 3.0.4 conflicts. To avoid these conflicts, the SR (i.e., the Surveillance or the Frequency) is stated such that it is only "required" when it can be and should be performed. With a SR satisfied, SR 3.0.4 imposes no restriction. (continued)

Frequency

1.4 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-11 1.4 Frequency (continued) EXAMPLES The following examples illustrate the various ways that Frequencies are specified: EXAMPLE 1.4-1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY Verify pressure within limit. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months Example 1.4-1 contains the type of SR most often encountered in the Technical Specifications (TS). The Frequency specifies an interval (12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months ) during which the associated Surveillance must be performed at least one time. Performance of the Surveillance initiates the subsequent interval. Although the Frequency is stated as 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months , an extension of the time interval to 1.25 times the stated Frequency is allowed by SR 3.0.2 for operational flexibility. The measurement of this interval continues at all times, even when the SR is not required to be met per SR 3.0.1 (such as when the equipment is determined to not meet the LCO, a variable is outside specified limits, or the unit is outside the Applicability of the LCO). If the interval specified by SR 3.0.2 is exceeded while the facility is in a condition specified in the Applicability of the LCO, the LCO is not met in accordance with SR 3.0.1. If the interval as specified by SR 3.0.2 is exceeded while the facility is not in a condition specified in the Applicability of the LCO for which performance of the SR is required, the Surveillance must be performed within the Frequency requirements of SR 3.0.2 prior to entry into the specified condition. Failure to do so would result in a violation of SR 3.0.4. (continued)

Frequency

1.4 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-12 1.4 Frequency (continued) EXAMPLES (continued) EXAMPLE 1.4-2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY Verify flow is within limits. Once within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months prior to starting activity AND 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months thereafter Example 1.4-2 has two Frequencies. The first is a one-time performance Frequency, and the second is of the type shown in Example 1.4-1. The logical connector "AND" indicates that both Frequency requirements must be met. Each time the example activity is to be performed, the Surveillance must be performed prior to starting the activity. The use of "once" indicates a single performance will satisfy the specified Frequency (assuming no other Frequencies are connected by "AND").

This type of Frequency does not qualify for the 25% extension allowed by

SR 3.0.2. "Thereafter" indicates future performances must be established per SR 3.0.2, but only after a specified condition is first met (i.e., the "once" performance in this example). If the specified activity is canceled or not performed, the measurement of both intervals stops. New intervals start upon preparing to restart the specified activity. (continued)

Frequency

1.4 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 1-13 1.4 Frequency (continued) EXAMPLES (continued) EXAMPLE 1.4-3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY ------------------- NOTE

Not required to be met until 96 hours0.00111 days 0.0267 hours 1.587302e-4 weeks 3.6528e-5 months after verifying the helium leak rate is within limit. -----------------------------------------------

Verify EOS DSC vacuum drying pressure is within limit.

Once after verifying the helium leak rate is within limit. As the Note modifies the required performance of the Surveillance, it is construed to be part of the "specified Frequency." Should the vacuum

drying pressure not be met immediately following verification of the helium leak rate while in LOADING OPERATIONS, this Note allows 96 hours0.00111 days 0.0267 hours 1.587302e-4 weeks 3.6528e-5 months to perform the Surveillance. The Surveillance is still considered to be performed within the "specified Frequency." Once the helium leak rate has been verified to be acceptable, 96 hours0.00111 days 0.0267 hours 1.587302e-4 weeks 3.6528e-5 months , plus the extension allowed by SR 3.0.2, would be allowed for completing the Surveillance for the vacuum drying pressure. If the Surveillance was not performed within this 96 hour0.00111 days 0.0267 hours 1.587302e-4 weeks 3.6528e-5 months interval, there would then be a failure to perform the Surveillance within the specified Frequency, and the provisions of SR 3.0.3 would apply.

Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC

2.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 2-1 FUNCTIONAL AND OPERATING LIMITS 2.0 Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC 2.1PHYSICAL PARAMETERS:

FUEL CLASS Unconsolidated B&W 15x15, WE 14x14, WE 15x15, WE 17x17, CE 14x14, CE 15x15 and CE 16x16 FUEL CLASS PWR fuel assemblies (with or without CCs) that are enveloped by the fuel assembly design characteristics listed in Table 1. Number of FUEL ASSEMBLIES with CCs 37 Maximum Assembly plus CC Weight 1900 lbs DAMAGED FUEL ASSEMBLIES:

Number and Location of DAMAGED FUEL Assemblies Maximum of 8 DAMAGED FUEL Assemblies as shown in Figure 1F and 1H. Balance may be INTACT FUEL, empty slots, or dummy assemblies. The DSC basket cells which store DAMAGED FUEL assemblies are provided with top and bottom end caps.

FAILED FUEL:

Number and Location of FAILED FUEL Maximum of 4 FAILED FUEL as shown in Figure 1F and 1H. Balance may be INTACT FUEL assemblies, empty slots, or dummy assemblies. The DSC basket cells which store FAILED FUEL are provided with top and bottom end caps. Maximum Uranium Loadings per FFC for FAILED FUEL Per Table 2 RECONSTITUTED FUEL ASSEMBLIES:

Number of RECONSTITUTED FUEL ASSEMBLIES per DSC 37 BLENDED LOW ENRICHED URANIUM (BLEU) FUEL Assemblies:

Number of BLEU FUEL Assemblies per DSC 37 (continued)

All Indicated Changes are in response to Crit-Shield 1 Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC

2.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 2-2 2.1 Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC (continued)

THERMAL/RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS:

Heat Load Zone Configuration and Fuel Qualification Limitations on decay heats are presented in the respective HLZC tables in Figures 1A through 1I. The maximum allowable heat loads may be reduced based on the thermal analysis methodology in the UFSAR. However, the maximum decay heat for each FA shall not exceed the values specified in the aforementioned figures. The licensee is responsible for ensuring that uncertainties in fuel enrichment and burnup are correctly accounted for during fuel qualification. For FAs with active fuel length shorter than 144 inches, reduce the maximum heat load per FA in each loading zone of the HLZCs using a scaling factor (SF) as shown below.

., , , , , FA Bounding eff FA Short eff FA Bounding a FA Short a FA Bounding FA Short k k L L SF SF q q Where, k eff= Effective conductivity for FA, q = Decay heat load per assembly defined for each loading zone, L a= Active fuel length, SF= Scaling factor (SF) for short FAs. The effective conductivity for the shorter FA should be determined using the same methodology documented in the UFSAR. For FAs with active fuel length greater than 144 inches, no scaling is required and the maximum heat loads listed for each HLZC are applicable.

Maximum Assembly Average Burnup 62 GWd/MTU Minimum Cooling Time

2.0 years

for TC125/135 3.0 years for EOS-TC108, additional limitations on cooling time for EOS-TC108 are specified in Figures 1A through 1I (continued)

Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC

2.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 2-3 2.1 Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC (continued)

Decay Heat per DSC 50.0 kW and as specified for the applicable heat load zone configuration Maximum Planar Average Initial Fuel Enrichment As specified in Table 4 as a function of minimum soluble boron concentration Minimum B-10 Concentration in Poison Plates As specified in Table 5 CONTROL COMPONENTS (CCs)

Maximum Co-60 equivalent activity for the CCs As specified in Table 3

Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-89BTH DSC

2.2 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 2-4 2.0 FUNCTIONAL AND OPERATING LIMITS Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-89BTH DSC 2.2PHYSICAL PARAMETERS:

FUEL CLASS INTACT unconsolidated 7x7, 8x8, 9x9, and 10x10 FUEL CLASS BWR assemblies (with or without channels) that are enveloped by the fuel assembly design characteristics listed in Table 6. NUMBER OF INTACT FUEL ASSEMBLIES 89 Channels Fuel may be stored with or without channels and associated channel hardware. Maximum Uranium Loading 198 kg/assembly Maximum Assembly Weight with a

Channel 705 lb RECONSTITUTED FUEL ASSEMBLIES:

Number of RECONSTITUTED FUEL ASSEMBLIES per DSC 89 BLENDED LOW ENRICHED URANIUM (BLEU) FUEL ASSEMBLIES:

Number of BLEU FUEL Assemblies per DSC 89 (continued)

Fuel to be Stored in the EOS-89BTH DSC

2.2 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 2-5 THERMAL/RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS:

Heat Load Zone Configuration (HLZC) and Fuel Qualification Per Figure 2 for HLZC 1 or HLZC 2 or HLZC 3. The maximum allowable heat loads may be reduced based on the thermal analysis methodology in the UFSAR. However, the maximum decay heat for each FA shall not exceed the values specified in the aforementioned figures. The licensee is responsible for ensuring that uncertainties in fuel enrichment and burnup are correctly accounted for during fuel qualification. For FAs with active fuel length shorter than 144 inches, reduce the maximum decay heat for each FA in each loading zone of the HLZCs using a scaling factor (SF) as shown below.

., , , , , FA Bounding eff FA Short eff FA Bounding a FA Short a FA Bounding FA Short k k L L SF SF q q Where, k eff = Effective conductivity for FA, q = Decay heat load per assembly defined for each loading zone, L a = Active fuel length, SF = Scaling factor for short FAs. The effective conductivity for the shorter FA should be determined using the same methodology documented in the UFSAR. For FAs with active fuel length greater than 144 inches, no scaling is required and the maximum heat loads listed for each HLZC are applicable. Maximum Assembly Average Burnup 62 GWd/MTU Minimum Cooling Time 3.0 Years and as specified for the applicable heat load zone configuration Decay Heat per DSC 43.6 kW and as specified for the applicable heat load zone configuration Maximum Lattice Average Initial Fuel Enrichment Per Table 8 Minimum B-10 Concentration in Poison Plates Per Table 8

Functional and Operating Limits Violations

2.3 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 2-6 2.0 FUNCTIONAL OPERATING LIMITS Functional and Operating Limits Violations 2.3If any Functional and Operating Limit of 2.1 or 2.2 is violated, the following ACTIONS shall be completed: 2.3.1 The affected fuel assemblies shall be placed in a safe condition. 2.3.2 Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , notify the NRC Operations Center. 2.3.3 Within 60 days, submit a special report which describes the cause of the violation and the ACTIONS taken to restore compliance and prevent recurrence.

LCO and SR Applicability

3.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-1 LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (LCO) AND SURVEILLANCE 3.0REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION LCO 3.0.1 LCOs shall be met during specified conditions in the Applicability, except as provided in LCO 3.0.2. LCO 3.0.2 Upon discovery of a failure to meet an LCO, the Required Actions of the associated Conditions shall be met, except as provided in LCO 3.0.5. If the LCO is met or is no longer applicable prior to expiration of the specified Completion Time(s), completion of the Required Action(s) is not required, unless otherwise stated. LCO 3.0.3 Not applicable to a spent fuel storage cask. LCO 3.0.4 When an LCO is not met, entry into a specified condition in the Applicability shall not be made except when the associated ACTIONS to be entered permit continued operation in the specified condition in the Applicability for an unlimited period of time. This Specification shall not prevent changes in specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS, or that are related to the unloading of a DSC. Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications. These exceptions allow entry into specified conditions in the Applicability when the associated ACTIONS to be entered allow operation in the specified condition in the Applicability only for a limited period of time. LCO 3.0.5 Equipment removed from service or not in service in compliance with ACTIONS may be returned to service under administrative control solely to perform testing required to demonstrate it meets the LCO or that other equipment meets the LCO. This is an exception to LCO 3.0.2 for the system returned to service under administrative control to perform the testing required to demonstrate that the LCO is met. LCO 3.0.6 Not applicable to a spent fuel storage cask. LCO 3.0.7 Not applicable to a spent fuel storage cask. (continued)

LCO and SR Applicability

3.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SR 3.0.1 SRs shall be met during the specified conditions in the Applicability for individual LCOs, unless otherwise stated in the SR. Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the LCO. Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the LCO except as provided in SR 3.0.3. Surveillances do not have to be performed on equipment or variables outside specified limits. SR 3.0.2 The specified Frequency for each SR is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met. For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply. If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . . ." basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance. Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications. SR 3.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the LCO not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or up to the limit of the specified Frequency, whichever is less. This delay period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance. If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be

entered. When the Surveillance is performed within the delay period and the Surveillance is not met, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered. SR 3.0.4 Entry into a specified condition in the Applicability of an LCO shall not be made unless the LCO's Surveillances have been met within their specified Frequency. This provision shall not prevent entry into specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS or that are related to the unloading of a DSC.

DSC Fuel Integrity

3.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-3 DSC Fuel Integrity 3.1 Fuel Integrity during Drying 3.1.1LCO 3.1.1 Medium: Helium shall be used for cover gas during drainage of bulk water (blowdown or draindown) from the DSC. Pressure: The DSC vacuum drying pressure shall be sustained at or below 3 Torr (3 mm Hg) absolute for a period of at least 30 minutes following evacuation. APPLICABILITY: During LOADING OPERATIONS but before TRANSFER OPERATIONS. ACTIONS: CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. If the required vacuum drying pressure cannot be obtained.

A.1 A.1.1 Confirm that the vacuum drying system is properly installed. Check and repair the vacuum drying

system as necessary. OR A.1.2 Establish helium pressure of at least 0.5

atm and no greater than 15 psig in the DSC. OR 30 days A.2 Flood the DSC with spent fuel pool water or water meeting the

requirements of LCO 3.2.1, if applicable, submerging all fuel assemblies.

30 days (continued)

DSC Fuel Integrity

3.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-4 3.1 DSC Fuel Integrity (continued)

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.1 Verify that the DSC vacuum drying pressure is less than or equal to 3 Torr (3 mm Hg) absolute for at least 30 minutes following evacuation.

Once per DSC, after an acceptable NDE of the inner top cover/shield plug assembly to DSC shell weld. (continued)

DSC Fuel Integrity

3.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-5 3.1 DSC Fuel Integrity (continued) DSC Helium Backfill Pressure 3.1.2LCO 3.1.2 DSC helium backfill pressure shall be 2.5 1 psig (stable for 30 minutes after filling) after completion of vacuum drying. APPLICABILITY: During LOADING OPERATIONS but before TRANSFER OPERATIONS. ACTIONS: CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME ----------------- NOTE ----------------- Not applicable until SR 3.1.2 is performed. --------------------------------------------

A. The required backfill pressure cannot be obtained or stabilized.

A.1 A.1.1 Maintain helium atmosphere in the DSC cavity. AND A.1.2 Confirm, check and repair or replace as necessary the vacuum drying system, helium source and pressure

gauge. 30 days AND A.1.3 Check and repair, as necessary, the seal weld between the inner top cover

plate and the DSC shell.

OR A.2 Establish the DSC helium backfill pressure to within the limit. If pressure exceeds the criterion, release a sufficient quantity

of helium to lower the DSC

cavity pressure within the

limit. OR 30 days (continued)

DSC Fuel Integrity

3.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-6 3.1 DSC Fuel Integrity (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A.3 Flood the DSC with spent fuel pool water or water

meeting the requirements of LCO 3.2.1, if applicable, submerging all fuel assemblies.

30 days SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.2 Verify that the DSC helium backfill pressure is 2.5 1 psig stable for 30 minutes after filling.

Once per DSC, after the completion of SR 3.1.1

requirement. (continued)

DSC Fuel Integrity

3.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-7 3.1 DSC Fuel Integrity (continued) Time Limit for Completion of DSC Transfer 3.1.3The time to transfer the DSC to the HSM shall be within the limits. LCO 3.1.3 Additionally, if the DSC and HLZC combination result in a time limit for completion of transfer from the table below, the air circulation system shall be assembled and be verified to be operable within 7 days before commencing the TRANSFER OPERATIONS of the loaded DSC.

DSC MODEL APPLICABLE HLZC TIME LIMITS (HOURS) EOS-37PTH HLZC 1 or 2 10 EOS-37PTH HLZC 3 No Limit EOS-37PTH HLZC 4-9 8 EOS-89BTH HLZC 1 or 2 10 EOS-89BTH HLZC 3 No Limit ----------------------------------------------------------- NOTE ----------------------------------------------------------- The time limit for completion of a DSC transfer is defined as the time elapsed in hours after the initiation of draining of TC/DSC annulus water until the completion of insertion of the DSC into the HSM. The time limit for transfer operations is determined based on the EOS-37PTH DSC in EOS-TC125 with the maximum allowable heat load of 50 kW. If the maximum heat load of a DSC is less than 50 kW, a new time limit can be determined to provide additional time for transfer operations. The calculated time limit shall not be less than the time limit specified in LCO 3.1.3. The calculation should be performed using the same methodology documented in the UFSAR. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(continued)

DSC Fuel Integrity

3.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-8 3.1 DSC Fuel Integrity (continued)

APPLICABILITY: During LOADING OPERATIONS AND TRANSFER OPERATIONS. ACTIONS: CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME -------------------- NOTE -------------------Not applicable until SR 3.1.3 is performed. -------------------------------------------------

-A. The required time limit for completion of a DSC transfer not met. A.1 If the TC is in the cask handling area in a vertical orientation, remove the TC top

cover plate and fill the TC/DSC annulus with clean water. OR 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months A.2 If the TC is in a horizontal orientation on the transfer skid, initiate air circulation in the TC/DSC annulus by starting one of the

redundant blowers. OR 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months

A.3 Return the TC to the cask handling area and follow required action A.1 above.

5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months

If Required Action A.2 is initiated, run the blower for a minimum of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months . After the blower is turned off, the time limit for completion of DSC transfer is 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months . If Required Action A.2 fails to complete within one hour, follow Required Action A.3 for the time remaining in the original Required Action A.3 completion time of 5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months . The minimum duration of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months to run the blower and the time limit of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months after the blower is turned off for completion of the transfer operations are determined based on the EOS-37PTH DSC in EOS-TC125 with the maximum allowable heat load of 50 kW. If the maximum heat load of a DSC is less than 50 kW, new time limits can be determined to provide additional time for these transfer operations. The calculated time limits shall not be less than 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months for completion of transfer operation after the blower is turned off. The calculation should be performed using the same methodology documented in the UFSAR.

(continued)

DSC Fuel Integrity

3.1 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-9 3.1 DSC Fuel Integrity (continued)

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.3 Verify that the time limit for completion of DSC transfer is met.

Once per DSC, after the initiation of draining of TC/DSC annulus water.

Cask Criticality Control

3.2 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-10 Cask Criticality Control

3.2 Soluble

Boron Concentration 3.2.1LCO 3.2.1 The boron concentration of the spent fuel pool water and the water added to the cavity of a loaded EOS-37PTH DSC shall be at least the boron concentration shown in Table 4 for the basket type and fuel enrichment selected. APPLICABILITY:

During LOADING and UNLOADING OPERATIONS with fuel and liquid water in the EOS-37PTH DSC cavity. ACTIONS: CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Soluble boron concentration limit not met. A.1 Suspend loading of fuel assemblies into DSC. AND A.2 Immediately A.2.1 Add boron and re-sample, and test the concentration until the boron concentration is shown to be at least that

required. OR Immediately A.2.2 Remove all fuel assemblies from DSC.

24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months Cask Criticality Control

3.2 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-11 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.2.1.1 Verify soluble boron concentration limit in spent fuel pool water and water to be added to the DSC cavity is met using two independent measurements (two samples analyzed by different

individuals) for LOADING OPERATIONS. Within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months before insertion of the first fuel assembly into the DSC.

AND Every 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months thereafter while the DSC is in the spent fuel pool or until the fuel has been removed from the DSC. SR 3.2.1.2 Verify dissolved boron concentration limit in spent fuel pool water and water to be added to the DSC cavity is met using

two independent measurements (two samples analyzed by different individuals) for UNLOADING OPERATIONS. Once within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months prior to flooding DSC during UNLOADING OPERATIONS.

AND Every 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months thereafter while the DSC is in the spent fuel pool or until the fuel has been removed from the DSC.

Radiation Protection

3.3 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-12 Radiation Protection 3.3 DSC and TRANSFER CASK (TC) Surface Contamination 3.3.1LCO 3.3.1 Removable surface contamination on the outer top 1 foot surface of the DSC AND the exterior surfaces of the TC shall not exceed: a. 2,200 dpm/100 cm 2 from beta and gamma sources; and b. 220 dpm/100 cm 2 from alpha sources. APPLICABILITY: During LOADING OPERATIONS ACTIONS: ---------------------------------------------------- NOTE ---------------------------------------------------------------Separate condition entry is allowed for each DSC and TC. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Top 1 foot exterior surface of the DSC removable surface contamination limits not met. A.1 Decontaminate the DSC to bring the removable contamination to within limits. Prior to TRANSFER OPERATIONS B. TC removable surface contamination limits not met. B.1 Decontaminate the TC to bring the removable contamination to within limits Prior to TRANSFER OPERATIONS

Radiation Protection

3.3 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 3-13 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.1.1 Verify that the removable contamination on the top 1 foot exterior surface of the DSC is within limits.

Once, prior to TRANSFER OPERATIONS. SR 3.3.1.2 Verify by either direct or indirect methods that the removable contamination on the exterior surfaces of the TC is within limits. Once, prior to TRANSFER OPERATIONS.

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-1 DESIGN FEATURES 4.0The specifications in this section include the design characteristics of special importance to each of the physical barriers and to the maintenance of safety margins in the NUHOMS EOS System design. Site 4.14.1.1 Site Location Because this UFSAR is prepared for a general license, a discussion of a site-specific ISFSI location is not applicable. Storage System Features 4.24.2.1 Storage Capacity The total storage capacity of the ISFSI is governed by the plant-specific license conditions. 4.2.2 Storage Pad For sites for which soil-structure interaction is considered important, the licensee is to perform site-specific analysis considering the effects of soil-structure interaction.

Amplified seismic spectra at the location of the HSM center of gravity (CG) is to be developed based on the soil-structure interaction (SSI) responses. EOS-HSM seismic analysis information is provided in UFSAR Appendix 3.9.4, Section 3.9.4.9.2. HSM-MX seismic analysis information is provided in UFSAR Appendix A.3.9.4, Section A.3.9.4.9.2. The storage pad location shall have no potential for liquefaction at the site-specific safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) level. Additional requirements for the pad configuration are provided in Technical Specification 4.5.2. Canister Criticality Control 4.3 The NUHOMS EOS-37PTH DSC is designed for the storage of PWR fuel assemblies with a maximum planar average initial enrichment of less than or equal to 5.0 wt. %

U-235 taking credit for soluble boron during LOADING OPERATIONS and the boron content in the poison plates of the DSC basket. The EOS-37PTH DSC uses a boron carbide/aluminum metal matrix composite (MMC) poison plate material. The EOS-37PTH DSC has two different neutron poison loading options, A and B, based on the boron content in the poison plates as listed in Table 5. Table 4 also defines the requirements for boron concentration in the DSC cavity water as a function of the DSC basket type for the various FUEL CLASSES authorized for storage in the EOS-37PTH DSC. The NUHOMS EOS-89BTH DSC is designed for the storage of BWR fuel assemblies with a maximum lattice average initial enrichment of less than or equal to 4.80 wt. %

U-235 taking credit for the boron content in the poison plates of the DSC basket. There are three neutron poison loading options specified for the EOS-89BTH DSC depending on the type of poison material and the B-10 areal density in the plates, as specified in Table 8. (continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-2 4.0 Design Features (continued) 4.3.1 Neutron Absorber Tests The neutron absorber used for criticality control in the DSC baskets may be one of the following materials: Boron carbide/aluminum metal matrix composite (MMC) BORAL (EOS-89BTH DSC only) Acceptance Testing (MMC and BORAL

) B-10 areal density is verified by neutron attenuation testing or by chemical analysis of coupons taken adjacent to finished panels, and isotopic analysis of the boron carbide powder. The minimum B-10 areal density requirements are specified in Table 5 and Table 8. Finished panels are subject to visual and dimensional inspection. Qualification Testing (MMC only)

MMCs are qualified for use in the NUHOMS EOS System by verification of the following characteristics. The chemical composition is boron carbide particles in an aluminum alloy matrix. The form is with or without an aluminum skin. The median boron carbide particle size by volume is 80 microns with no more than 10% over 100 microns. The boron carbide content is 50% by volume. The porosity is 3%. 4.3.2 High Strength Low Alloy Steel for Basket Structure The basket structural material shall be a high strength low alloy (HSLA) steel meeting one of the following requirements A, B, or C: A. ASTM A829 Gr 4130 or AMS 6345 SAE 4130, quenched and tempered at not less than 1050°F, 103.6 ksi minimum yield strength and 123.1 ksi minimum ultimate strength at room temperature. B. ASME SA-517 Gr A, B, E, F, or P. C. Other HSLA steel, with the specified heat treatment, meeting these qualification criteria: i. If quenched and tempered, the tempering shall be at no less than 1000 °F, ii. Qualified prior to first use by testing at least two lots and demonstrating that the fracture toughness value KJIc 150 ksi in at -40 °F with 95% confidence. iii. Qualified prior to first use by testing at least two lots and demonstrating that the 95% lower tolerance limit of yield strength and ultimate strength the values in UFSAR Table 8-10.

(continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-3

4.0 Design

Features (continued) The basket structural material shall also meet one of the following production acceptance criteria for impact testing at -40 °F: a. Charpy testing per ASTM A370, minimum absorbed energy 25 ft-lb average, 20 ft-lb lowest of three (for sub-size specimens, reduce these criteria per ASTM A370-17 Table 9), or b. Dynamic tear testing per ASTM E604 with acceptance criterion minimum 80% shear fracture appearance. Codes and Standards 4.44.4.1 HORIZONTAL STORAGE MODULE (HSM) The reinforced concrete HSM is designed in accordance with the provisions of ACI 349-06. Code alternatives are discussed in Technical Specification 4.4.4. Load combinations specified in ANSI 57.9-1984, Section 6.17.3.1 are used for combining normal operating, off-normal, and accident loads for the HSM. 4.4.2 DRY SHIELDED CANISTER (DSC) (EOS-37PTH and EOS-89BTH DSC) The DSC confinement boundary is designed, fabricated and inspected to the maximum practical extent in accordance with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 1, 2010 Edition with Addenda through 2011, Subsection NB, for Class 1 components. Code alternatives are discussed in Technical Specification 4.4.4. 4.4.3 TRANSFER CASK The TC design stress analysis, exclusive of the trunnions and the neutron shield enclosures, is performed in accordance with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 1, 2010 Edition with Addenda through 2011, Article NF-3000, for Class 1 supports. The stress allowables for the upper trunnions conform to ANSI N14.6-1993 for single-failure-proof lifting. 4.4.4 Alternatives to Codes and Standards ASME Code alternatives for the EOS-37PTH and EOS-89BTH DSC are listed below:

(continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-4 4.0 Design Features (continued)

DSC ASME Code Alternatives, Subsection NB REFERENCE ASME CODE SECTION/ARTICLE CODE REQUIREMENT JUSTIFICATION AND COMPENSATORY MEASURES NCA All Not compliant with NCA NB-1100 Requirements for Code Stamping of Components The canister shell, the inner top cover, the inner bottom cover, the outer top cover, and the siphon and vent port covers are designed and fabricated in accordance with the ASME Code,Section III, Subsection NB to the maximum extent practical. However, Code Stamping is not required. As Code Stamping is not required, the fabricator is not required to hold an ASME "N" or "NPT" stamp, or to be ASME Certified. NB-2121 Permitted Material Specifications Type 2205 and UNS S31803 are duplex stainless steels that provide enhance resistance to chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking. They are not included in Section II, Part D, Subpart 1, Tables 2A and 2B. UNS S31803 has been accepted for Class 1 components by ASME Code Case N-635-1, endorsed by NRC Regulatory Guide 1.84. Type 2205 falls within the chemical and mechanical requirements of UNS S31803. Normal and off-normal temperatures remain below the 600 °F operating limit. Accident conditions may exceed this limit, but only for durations too short to cause embrittlement. NB-2130 Material must be supplied by ASME approved material

suppliers Material is certified to meet all ASME Code criteria but is not eligible for certification or Code Stamping if a non-ASME fabricator is used. As the fabricator is not required to be ASME certified, material certification to NB-2130 is not possible. Material traceability and certification are maintained in accordance with the NRC approved QA program associated with CoC 1042. NB-4121 Material Certification by Certificate Holder (continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-5 4.0 Design Features (continued)

DSC ASME Code Alternatives, Subsection NB (continued)

REFERENCE ASME CODE SECTION/ARTICLE CODE REQUIREMENT JUSTIFICATION AND COMPENSATORY MEASURES NB-2300 Fracture toughness requirements for material Type 2205 and UNS S31803 duplex stainless steels are tested by Charpy V-notch only per NB-2300. Drop weight tests are not required.

Impact testing is not required for the vent port plug.

NB-2531 Siphon port cover; straight beam ultrasonic testing (UT) per SA-578 for all plates for vessel SA-578 applies to 3/8" and thicker plate only; allow alternate UT techniques to achieve meaningful UT results. NB- 2531 and NB-2541 Vent port plug UT and liquid penetrant testing (PT) This plug may be made from plate or bar. Due to its small area, it has no structural function. It is leak tested along with the inner top cover plate after welding. Therefore, neither UT nor PT are required. NB-4243 and NB-5230 Category C weld joints in vessels and similar weld joints in other components

shall be full penetration joints. These welds shall be examined by UT or radiographic testing (RT) and either PT or magnetic particle testing (MT). The shell to the outer top cover weld, the shell to the inner top cover weld and the siphon cover and vent plug welds are all partial penetration welds. As an alternative to the non-destructive examination (NDE) requirements of NB-5230 for Category C welds, all of these closure welds will be multi-layer welds and receive a root and final PT examination, except for the shell to the outer top cover weld. The shell to the outer top cover weld will be a multi-layer weld and receive multi-level PT examination in accordance with the guidance provided in NUREG 1536 Revision 1 for NDE. The multi-level PT examination provides

reasonable assurance that flaws of interest will be identified. The PT examination is done by qualified personnel, in accordance with Section V and the acceptance standards of Section III, Subsection NB-5000. The cover to shell welds are designed to meet the guidance provided in ISG-15 for stress reduction factor. NB-5520 NDE Personnel must be qualified to the 1992 edition of SNT-TC-1A Permit use of the Recommended Practice SNT-TC-1A up to the 2006 edition as permitted by the 2013 Code

Edition. (continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-6 4.0 Design Features (continued)

DSC ASME Code Alternatives, Subsection NB (continued)

REFERENCE ASME CODE SECTION/ARTICLE CODE REQUIREMENT JUSTIFICATION AND COMPENSATORY MEASURES NB-6000 All completed pressure retaining systems shall be pressure tested The DSC is not a complete or "installed" pressure vessel until the top closure is welded following placement of fuel assemblies within the DSC. Due to the inaccessibility of the shell and lower end closure welds following fuel loading and top closure welding, as an alternative, the pressure testing of the DSC is performed in two parts. The DSC shell, shell bottom, including all longitudinal and circumferential welds, is pneumatically tested and examined at the fabrication

facility. The shell to the inner top cover closure weld is pressure tested and examined for leakage in accordance with NB-6300 in the field. The siphon and vent cover welds will not be pressure tested; these welds and the shell to the inner top cover closure weld are helium leak tested after the pressure test. Per NB-6324 the examination for leakage shall be done at a pressure equal to the greater of the design pressure or three-fourths of the test pressure. As an alternative, if the examination for leakage of these field welds, following the pressure test, is performed using helium leak detection techniques, the examination pressure may be reduced to 1.5 psig. This is acceptable given the significantly greater sensitivity of the helium leak detection method. NB-7000 Overpressure Protection No overpressure protection is provided for the EOS-37PTH or EOS-89BTH DSC. The function of the DSC is to contain radioactive materials under normal, off-normal, and hypothetical accident conditions postulated to occur during transportation. The DSC is designed to withstand the maximum internal pressure considering 100% fuel rod failure at maximum accident temperature. NB-8000 Requirements for nameplates, stamping and reports per NCA-8000 The EOS-37PTH and EOS-89BTH DSC are stamped or engraved with the information required by 10 CFR Part 72. Code stamping is not required for these DSCs. QA Data packages are prepared in accordance with requirements of the NRC approved QA program associated with CoC 1042. (continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-7 4.0 Design Features (continued)

Code alternatives for the HSM concrete specifications are listed below:

REFERENCE ACI-349-06 SECTION/ARTICLE CODE REQUIREMENT ALTERNATIVES, JUSTIFICATION AND COMPENSATORY MEASURES Appendix E, Section E.4-Concrete Temperatures Section E.4.1 specifies that the concrete temperatures for normal operations shall not exceed 150 °F except for local areas such as around penetrations, which are allowed to have increased temperatures not to exceed 200 °F Section E.4.2 specifies that the concrete temperatures for accident condition shall not exceed 350 °F The concrete temperature limit criteria in NUREG-1536, Section 8.4.14.2 is used for normal and off-normal conditions.

Alternatively, per ACI 349-13, Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures and Commentary, Section RE.4, the specified 28-day compressive strength is increased to 7,000 psi for HSM fabrication so that any losses in properties (e.g., compressive strength) resulting from long-term thermal exposure will not affect the safety margins based on the specified 5,000 psi compressive strength used in the design calculations. Additionally, also as indicated in Section RE.4, short, randomly oriented steel fibers may be used to provide increased ductility, dynamic strength, toughness, tensile strength, and improved resistance to spalling. The safety margin on compressive strength is 40% for a concrete temperature limit of 300 °F normal and off-normal conditions, Proposed alternatives to the above-specified ASME and ACI codes, other than the aforementioned alternatives, may be used when authorized by the Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, or designee. The applicant should demonstrate that: 1. The proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or 2. Compliance with the specified requirements of above-specified ASME and ACI codes would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The applicant should also submit information regarding the environmental impact of such a request to support the NRC's NEPA regulations in 10 CFR Part 51. Any proposed alternatives must be submitted and approved prior to implementation. Requests for exceptions in accordance with this section should be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 72.4.

(continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-8 4.0 Design Features (continued) Storage Location Design Features 4.5The following storage location design features and parameters shall be verified by the system user to assure technical agreement with the UFSAR. 4.5.1 Storage Configuration EOS-HSMs and HSM-MXs are placed together in single rows or back to back arrays. A rear shield wall is placed on the rear of any single row loaded EOS-HSM. 4.5.2 Concrete Storage Pad Properties to Limit DSC Gravitational Loadings Due to Postulated Drops The EOS-37PTH DSC and EOS-89BTH DSC have been evaluated for drops of up to 65 inches onto a reinforced concrete storage pad. 4.5.3 Site Specific Parameters and Analyses The following parameters and analyses are applicable to all HSMs unless specifically noted and shall be verified by the system user for applicability at their specific site. Other natural phenomena events, such as lightning, tsunamis, hurricanes, and seiches, are site specific and their effects are generally bounded by other events, but they should be

evaluated by the user. 1. Flood levels up to 50 ft and water velocity of 15 fps. 2. One-hundred year roof snow load of 110 psf. 3. Normal ambient temperature is based on the heat load of the DSC as follows:

For the EOS-HSM: a. For the EOS-37PTH DSCs with a heat load less than or equal to 41.8 kW or for the EOS-89BTH DSCs with a heat load less than or equal to 41.6 kW, the minimum temperature is -20 °F. The maximum calculated normal average ambient temperature corresponding to a 24-hour period is 90 °F. b. For the EOS-37PTH DSCs with a heat load greater than 41.8 kW or for the EOS-89BTH DSCs with a heat load greater than 41.6 kW, the minimum temperature is -20 °F. The maximum calculated average yearly temperature is 70 °F.

For the HSM-MX: c. The minimum temperature is -20 °F. The maximum calculated normal average ambient temperature corresponding to a 24-hour period is 90 °F. 4. Off-normal ambient temperature range of -40 °F without solar insolation to 117 °F with full solar insolation. The 117 °F off-normal ambient temperature corresponds to a 24-hour calculated average temperature of 103 °F.

(continued)

Design Features

4.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 4-9 4.0 Design Features (continued) 5. The response spectra at the base of the HSMs shall be compared against the response spectra defined in UFSAR Section 2.3.4 for the EOS-HSM, and Section A.2.3.4 for the HSM-MX and shown to be enveloped by the UFSAR response spectra. If it is not enveloped, stability can be demonstrated by either static or dynamic analysis. 6. The potential for fires and explosions shall be addressed, based on site-specific considerations. 7. Supplemental Shielding: In cases where engineered features (i.e., berms, shield walls) are used to ensure that the requirements of 10 CFR 72.104(a) are met, such features are to be considered important to safety and must be evaluated to determine the applicable Quality Assurance Category. 8. If an INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION (ISFSI) site is located in a coastal salt water marine atmosphere, then any load-bearing carbon steel DSC support structure rail components for the EOS-HSM, or front and rear DSC supports for the HSM-MX shall be procured with a minimum 0.20% copper content or stainless steel shall be used for corrosion resistance. For weld filler material used with carbon steel, 1% or more nickel bearing weld material would also be acceptable in lieu of 0.20% copper content. 9. If an ISFSI site is required to evaluate blockage of air vents for durations longer than evaluated in the UFSAR, a new duration can be determined based on site-specific parameters. The evaluation should be performed using the same methodology documented in the UFSAR.

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-1 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

5.0 Programs

5.1 Each user of the NUHOMS EOS System will implement the following programs to ensure the safe operation and maintenance of the ISFSI: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (see 5.1.1 below) Radiation Protection Program (see 5.1.2 below) HSM Thermal Monitoring Program (see 5.1.3 below) 5.1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program

a. A radiological environmental monitoring program will be implemented to ensure that the annual dose equivalent to an individual located outside the ISFSI controlled area does not exceed the annual dose limits specified in 10 CFR

72.104(a). b. Operation of the ISFSI will not create any radioactive materials or result in any credible liquid or gaseous effluent release. 5.1.2 Radiation Protection Program The Radiation Protection Program will establish administrative controls to limit personnel exposure to As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) levels in accordance with 10 CFR Part 20 and Part 72. a. As part of its evaluation pursuant to 10 CFR 72.212, the licensee shall perform an analysis to confirm that the limits of 10 CFR Part 20 and 10 CFR 72.104 will be satisfied under the actual site conditions and configurations considering the planned number of DSCs to be used and the planned fuel loading conditions. b. On the basis of the analysis in TS 5.1.2(a), the licensee shall establish a set of HSM dose rate limits which are to be applied to DSCs used at the site. Limits shall establish dose rates for: i. HSM front face, ii. HSM door centerline, and iii. End shield wall exterior for the EOS-HSM or exterior side wall of the HSM-MX monolith. c. Notwithstanding the limits established in TS 5.1.2(b), the dose rate limits may not exceed the following values as calculated for a content of design basis fuel as follows: For EOS-HSM: i. 25 mrem/hr average over the front face, ii. 10 mrem/hr at the door centerline, and iii. 5 mrem/hr at the end shield wall exterior.

(continued)

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-2 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (continued) For HSM-MX: i. 50 mrem/hr average over the front face, ii. 10 mrem/hr at the door centerline, and iii. 5 mrem/hr at the exterior side wall of the HSM-MX monolith. If the measured dose rates do not meet the limits of TS 5.1.2(b) or TS 5.1.2(c),

whichever are lower, the licensee shall take the following actions: Notify the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards) within 30 days, Administratively verify that the correct fuel was loaded, Ensure proper installation of the HSM door, Ensure that the DSC is properly positioned on the DSC supports, and Perform an analysis to determine that placement of the as-loaded DSC at the ISFSI will not cause the ISFSI to exceed the radiation exposure limits of 10 CFR Part 20 and 10 CFR Part 72 and/or provide additional shielding to assure exposure limits are not exceeded. d. A monitoring program to ensure the annual dose equivalent to any real individual located outside the ISFSI controlled area does not exceed regulatory limits is incorporated as part of the environmental monitoring program in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program of TS 5.1.1. e. When using the EOS-TC108 with a liquid neutron shield (NS), the NS shall be verified to be filled when DSC cavity draining or TC/DSC annulus draining operations are initiated and continually monitored during the first five minutes of the draining evolution to ensure the NS remains filled. The NS shall also be verified to be filled prior to the movement of the loaded TC from the decontamination area. Observation of water level in the expansion tank or some other means can be used to verify compliance with this requirement. f. Following completion of the DSC shell assembly at the fabricator facility, the inner bottom cover plate, canister shell and all associated welds are leak-tested to demonstrate that these welds and components meet the "leak-tight" criterion ( 1.0 x 10-7 reference cm 3/sec) as defined in "American National Standard for Radioactive Materials - Leakage Tests on Packages for Shipment", ANSI N14.5-1997. If the leakage rate exceeds 1.0 x 10

-7 reference cm 3/sec, check and repair these welds or components. Following completion of the welding of the DSC shell to the inner top cover and drain port cover and vent plug after fuel loading, these welds and components are leak-tested to demonstrate that they meet the "leak-tight" criterion ( 1.0 x 10-7 reference cm 3/sec) as defined in "American National Standard for Radioactive Materials - Leakage Tests on Packages for Shipment", ANSI N14.5-1997. If the leakage rate exceeds 1.0 x 10

-7 reference cm 3/sec, check and repair these welds or components.

(continued)

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-3 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (continued) 5.1.3 HSM Thermal Monitoring Program Two separate programs for the EOS-HSM and MATRIX HSM are described in Technical Specifications 5.1.3.1 and 5.1.3.2, respectively. 5.1.3.1 EOS-HSM Thermal Monitoring Program This program provides guidance for temperature measurements that are used to monitor the thermal performance of each EOS-HSM. The intent of the program is to prevent conditions that could lead to exceeding the concrete and fuel clad temperature criteria.

Each user must implement either TS 5.1.3.1(a) OR 5.1.3.1(b). a. Daily Visual Inspection of EOS-HSM Inlets and Outlets (Front Wall and Roof Birdscreens) and Wind Deflectors i. The user shall develop and implement procedures to perform visual inspection of EOS-HSM inlets and outlets on a daily basis. Perform a daily visual inspection of the air vents to ensure that EOS-HSM air vents are not blocked for more than 40 hours4.62963e-4 days 0.0111 hours 6.613757e-5 weeks 1.522e-5 months . If visual inspection indicates blockage, clear air vents and replace or repair birdscreens if damaged. If the air vents are blocked or could have been blocked for more than 40 hours4.62963e-4 days 0.0111 hours 6.613757e-5 weeks 1.522e-5 months , evaluate existing conditions in accordance with the site corrective action

program to confirm that conditions adversely affecting the concrete or fuel cladding do not exist. ii. Daily Visual Inspection of Wind Deflectors If wind deflectors are required per TS 5.5, the user shall develop and implement procedures to perform visual inspection of the wind deflectors on a daily basis. There is a possibility that the wind deflectors could become damaged or lost by extreme winds, tornados, or other accidents. The condition caused by a damaged or lost wind deflector is bounded by the air vent blockage postulated and analyzed in the UFSAR accident analyses. The procedures shall ensure that the duration of a damaged or lost wind deflector will not exceed periods longer than 40 hours4.62963e-4 days 0.0111 hours 6.613757e-5 weeks 1.522e-5 months as assumed in the UFSAR analyses for vent blockage. If visual inspection indicates a damaged or lost wind deflector, replace or repair the wind deflector. If the wind deflectors are damaged or

could have been damaged for more than 40 hours4.62963e-4 days 0.0111 hours 6.613757e-5 weeks 1.522e-5 months , evaluate existing conditions in accordance with the site corrective action program to confirm that conditions adversely affecting the concrete or fuel cladding do not exist.

(continued)

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-4 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (continued) b. Daily EOS-HSM Temperature Measurement Program i. The user shall develop a daily temperature measurement program to verify the thermal performance of each NUHOMS EOS System. The user shall establish administrative temperature limits to (1) detect off-normal and accident blockage conditions before the EOS- HSM components and fuel cladding temperatures would exceed temperature design limits and (2) ensure the EOS-HSM air vents are not blocked for more than 40 hours4.62963e-4 days 0.0111 hours 6.613757e-5 weeks 1.522e-5 months . The daily temperature measurements shall include one of the following options: 1. direct measurement of the EOS-HSM concrete temperature 2. direct measurement of inlet and outlet air temperatures If the direct measurement of the inlet and outlet air temperatures (option 2) is performed, the measured temperature differences of the inlet and outlet vents of each individual EOS-HSM must be compared to the predicted temperature differences for each individual EOS-HSM during normal operations. The measured temperature difference between the inlet and outlet vents shall not exceed 138 °F. ii. The user shall establish in the program, measurement locations in the EOS-HSM that are representative of the EOS-HSM thermal performance and directly correlated to the predicted fuel cladding temperatures, air mass flow

rates, and NUHOMS EOS System temperature distributions that would occur with the off-normal and accident blockage conditions, as analyzed in the UFSAR. The administrative temperature limits shall employ appropriate safety margins that ensure temperatures would not exceed design basis temperature limits in the UFSAR, and be based on the UFSAR methodologies used to predict thermal performance of the NUHOMS EOS System. If the direct measurement of the inlet and outlet air temperatures (option 2) is performed, the user must develop procedures to measure air temperatures that are representative of inlet and outlet air temperatures, as analyzed in the UFSAR. The user must also consider site-specific environmental conditions, loaded decay heat patterns, and the proximity of adjacent EOS-HSM modules in the daily air temperature measurement program. The user must ensure that measured air temperatures reflect only the thermal performance of each individual module, and not the combined performance of adjacent modules. iii. The user shall establish in the program the appropriate actions to be taken if administrative temperature criteria are exceeded. If an administrative temperature limit is exceeded during a daily measurement, the user shall inspect the vents, wind deflectors if installed, and implement TS 5.1.3.1(a) for the affected system, until the cause of the excursion is determined and necessary corrective actions are completed under the site corrective action program.

(continued)

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-5 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (continued) iv. If measurements or other evidence indicate that the EOS-HSM concrete temperatures limits have been exceeded, the user shall perform an analysis and/or tests of the concrete in accordance with TS 5.3. The user shall demonstrate that the structural strength of the EOS-HSM has an adequate margin of safety and take appropriate actions to return the EOS-HSM to normal operating conditions. v. If measurements or other evidence indicate that off-normal or accident temperature limits for fuel cladding have been exceeded, verify that canister confinement is maintained and assess analytically the condition of the fuel. Additionally, within 30 days, take appropriate actions to restore the spent fuel to a safe configuration. 5.1.3.2 HSM-MX Thermal Monitoring Program This program provides guidance for temperature measurements that are used to monitor the thermal performance of each HSM-MX. There are no credible scenarios that could block both the inlet and outlet vents. Therefore, only blockage of inlet vent is considered in the UFSAR. The intent of the program is to prevent conditions that could lead to exceeding the concrete and fuel clad temperature criteria. Each user must implement either TS 5.1.3.2(a) OR 5.1.3.2(b). a. Daily Visual Inspection of HSM-MX Inlets and Outlets (Front Wall and Roof Birdscreens) The user shall develop and implement procedures to perform visual inspection of HSM-MX inlets and outlets on a daily basis. Perform a daily visual inspection of the air vents to ensure that HSM-MX air vents are not blocked for more than 32 hours3.703704e-4 days 0.00889 hours 5.291005e-5 weeks 1.2176e-5 months . If visual inspection indicates blockage, clear air vents and replace or repair birdscreens if damaged. If the air vents are blocked or could have been blocked for more than 32 hours3.703704e-4 days 0.00889 hours 5.291005e-5 weeks 1.2176e-5 months , evaluate existing conditions in accordance with the site corrective action program to confirm that conditions adversely affecting the concrete or fuel cladding do not exist. b. Daily HSM-MX Temperature Measurement Program i. The user shall develop a daily temperature measurement program to verify the thermal performance of each HSM-MX System through direct measure of the HSM-MX concrete temperature. The user shall establish administrative temperature limits to (1) detect off-normal and accident blockage conditions before the HSM components and fuel cladding temperatures would exceed temperature design limits and (2) ensure the HSM-MX air vents are not blocked for more than 32 hours3.703704e-4 days 0.00889 hours 5.291005e-5 weeks 1.2176e-5 months . ii. The user shall establish in the program measurement locations in the HSM-MX that are representative of the HSM-MX thermal performance and directly correlated to the predicted fuel cladding temperatures, air mass flow rates, and NUHOMS MATRIX System temperature distributions that would (continued)

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-6 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (continued) occur with the off-normal and accident blockage conditions, as analyzed in the UFSAR. The administrative temperature limits shall employ appropriate safety margins that ensure temperatures would not exceed design basis temperature limits in the UFSAR, and be based on the UFSAR methodologies used to predict thermal performance of the NUHOMS MATRIX System. iii. The user shall establish in the program the appropriate actions to be taken if administrative temperature criteria are exceeded. If an administrative temperature limit is exceeded during a daily measurement, the user shall inspect the vents and implement TS 5.1.3.2(a) for the affected system, until the cause of the excursion is determined and necessary corrective actions are completed under the site corrective action program. iv. If measurements or other evidence indicate that the HSM-MX concrete temperatures limits have been exceeded, the user shall perform an analysis and/or tests of the concrete in accordance with TS 5.3. The user shall demonstrate that the structural strength of the HSM-MX has an adequate margin of safety and take appropriate actions to return the HSM-MX to normal operating conditions. v. If measurements or other evidence indicate that off-normal or accident temperature limits for fuel cladding have been exceeded, verify that canister confinement is maintained and assess analytically the condition of the fuel. Additionally, within 30 days, take appropriate actions to restore the spent fuel to a safe configuration. Lifting Controls 5.25.2.1 TC/DSC Lifting Height and Temperature Limits The requirements of 10 CFR 72 apply to TC/DSC lifting/handling height limits outside the FUEL BUILDING. The requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 apply to TC/DSC lifting/handling height limits inside the FUEL BUILDING. Confirm the surface temperature of the TC before TRANSFER OPERATIONS of the loaded TC/DSC. The lifting height of a loaded TC/ DSC is limited as a function of low temperature and the type of lifting/handling device, as follows: No lifts or handling of the TC/DSC at any height are permissible at TC surface temperatures below 0 °F The maximum lift height of the TC/DSC shall be 65 inches if the surface temperature of the TC is above 0 °F and a non-single-failure-proof lifting/handling device is used. No lift height restriction is imposed on the TC/DSC if the TC surface temperature is higher than 0 °F and a single-failure-proof lifting/handling system is used.

(continued)

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-7 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (continued) The requirements of 10 CFR Part 72 apply when the TC/DSC is in a horizontal

orientation on the transfer trailer. The requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 apply when the TC/DSC is being lifted/handled using the cask handling crane/hoist. (This distinction is valid only with respect to lifting/handling height limits.) 5.2.2 Cask Drop Inspection Requirement The TC will be inspected for damage and the DSC will be evaluated after any TC with a loaded DSC side drop of 15 inches or greater. Background TC/DSC handling and loading activities are controlled under the 10 CFR Part 50 license until a loaded TC/DSC is placed on the transporter, at which time fuel handling activities are controlled under the 10 CFR Part 72 license. Safety Analysis The analysis of bounding drop scenarios shows that the TC will maintain the structural integrity of the DSC confinement boundary from an analyzed side drop height of 65 inches. The 65-inch drop height envelopes the maximum height from the bottom of the TC when secured to the transfer trailer while en route to the ISFSI. Although analyses performed for cask drop accidents at various orientations indicate much greater resistance to damage, requiring the inspection of the DSC after a side drop of 15 inches or greater ensures that: 1. The DSC will continue to provide confinement. 2. The TC can continue to perform its design function regarding DSC transfer and shielding. Concrete Testing 5.3HSM concrete shall be tested during the fabrication process for elevated temperatures to verify that there are no significant signs of spalling or cracking and that the concrete compressive strength is greater than that assumed in the structural analysis. Tests shall be performed at or above the calculated peak temperature and for a period no less than the permissible duration as specified in Technical Specification 5.1.3. HSM concrete temperature testing shall be performed whenever: There is a change in the supplier of the cement, or There is a change in the source of the aggregate, or The water-cement ratio changes by more than 0.04.

(continued)

Administrative Controls

5.0 NUHOMS

EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 5-8 5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (continued) Hydrogen Gas Monitoring 5.4For DSCs, while welding the inner top cover during LOADING OPERATIONS, and while cutting the inner top cover to DSC shell weld when the DSC cavity is wet during UNLOADING OPERATIONS, hydrogen monitoring of the space under the inner top cover plug in the DSC cavity is required, to ensure that the combustible mixture concentration remains below the flammability limit of 4%. If this limit is exceeded, all welding operations shall be stopped and the DSC cavity purged with helium to reduce hydrogen concentration safely below the limit before welding or cutting operations can be resumed. EOS-HSM Wind Deflectors 5.5If the heat load of an EOS-37PTH DSC loaded per HLZC 1, 4, or 6 during STORAGE OPERATIONS is greater than 41.8 kW, wind deflectors shall be installed on the EOS-HSM. If the heat load of a fuel assembly loaded per HLZC 5 in the EOS-37PTH DSC during STORAGE OPERATIONS is greater than 1.625 kW, wind deflectors shall be installed on the EOS-HSM. If the heat load of an EOS-89BTH DSC during STORAGE OPERATIONS is greater than 41.6 kW, wind deflectors shall be installed on the EOS-HSM.

Tables NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 T-1 Table 1 Fuel Assembly Design Characteristics for the EOS-37PTH DSC PWR FUEL CLASS B&W 15X15 WE 17X17 CE 15X15 WE 15X15 CE 14X14 WE 14X14 CE 16X16Fissile Material UO 2 UO 2 UO 2 UO 2 UO 2 UO 2 UO 2 Maximum Number of Fuel

Rods 208 264 216 204 176 179 236 Maximum Number of Guide/ Instrument Tubes 17 25 9 21 5 17 5 Table 2 Maximum Uranium Loading per FFC for Failed PWR Fuel Fuel Assembly Class Maximum Uranium Loading (MTU) WE 17x17 0.550 CE 16x16 0.456 BW 15x15 0.492 WE 15x15 0.480 CE 15x15 0.450 CE 14x14 0.400 WE 14x14 0.410 Table 3 Co-60 Equivalent Activity for CCs Stored in the EOS-37PTH DSC Fuel Region Maximum Co-60 Activity per Heat Load Zone (1) (Curies/FA)

Inner Zone (2) Peripheral Zone (2) Active Fuel 308 308 Plenum/Top Region 63.0 24.3 Notes: 1. Heat Load Zones are shown in Figures 1A through 1I. 2. NSAs and Neutron Sources shall only be stored in the inner zone of the basket. Figure 3 defines the compartments categorized as the Inner and Peripheral Zones.

All Indicated Changes are in response to Crit-Shield 1 Tables NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 T-2 Table 4 Maximum Planar Average Initial Enrichment for EOS-37PTH (2 Pages)

PWR Fuel Class Maximum Planar Average Initial Enrichment (wt. % U-235) as a Function of Soluble Boron Concentration and Basket Type (Fixed Poison Loading) With and Without CCs Minimum Soluble Boron (ppm) Basket Type A1/A2/A3/A4H/A4L/A5 B1/B2/B3/B4H/B4L/B5 w/o CCs w/ CCs w/o CCs w/ CCs INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/FAILED FUEL INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/FAILED FUEL INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/ FAILED FUEL INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/FAILED FUEL WE 17x17 Class 2000 4.35 4.20 4.35 4.15 4.50 4.15 4.45 4.25 2100 4.50 4.20 4.45 4.20 4.65 4.25 4.60 4.40 2200 4.60 4.40 4.55 4.35 4.75 4.45 4.70 4.55 2300 4.70 4.45 4.65 4.50 4.85 4.65 4.85 4.60 2400 4.85 4.45 4.80 4.60 5.00 4.65 4.95 4.75 2500 4.95 4.65 4.90 4.70 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.95 CE 16x16 Class 2000 5.00 4.75 5.00 4.70 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 2100 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 - - - - 2200 - - - - - - - - 2300 - - - - - - - - 2400 - - - - - - - - 2500 - - - - - - - - BW 15x15 Class 2000 4.25 4.05 4.20 4.00 4.40 4.10 4.35 4.15 2100 4.40 4.10 4.30 4.15 4.55 4.20 4.45 4.25 2200 4.50 4.25 4.45 4.15 4.65 4.35 4.60 4.30 2300 4.60 4.35 4.55 4.30 4.80 4.40 4.70 4.50 2400 4.75 4.40 4.65 4.45 4.90 4.55 4.85 4.50 2500 4.85 4.55 4.75 4.65 5.00 4.75 4.90 4.75 2600 (1) (1) (1) (1) 5.00 5.00 (1) (1) WE 15x15 2000 4.45 4.10 4.40 4.10 4.55 4.30 4.55 4.25 2100 4.60 4.15 4.55 4.15 4.65 4.50 4.65 4.35 2200 4.70 4.25 4.65 4.35 4.80 4.55 4.80 4.45 2300 4.85 4.35 4.75 4.45 5.00 4.50 4.95 4.50 2400 4.95 4.50 4.90 4.50 5.00 4.90 5.00 4.80 2500 5.00 4.75 5.00 4.65 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CE 15x15 Assembly Class 2000 4.60 4.25 4.55 4.20 4.75 4.35 4.70 4.30 2100 4.70 4.45 4.65 4.40 4.85 4.50 4.85 4.35 2200 4.85 4.50 4.80 4.45 5.00 4.60 4.95 4.60 2300 5.00 4.55 4.90 4.65 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.80 2400 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.85 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 2500 - - 5.00 5.00 - - - - CE 14x14 Assembly Class 2000 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.95 2100 - - 5.00 4.95 - - 5.00 5.00 2200 - - 5.00 5.00 - - - - 2300 - - - - - - - - 2400 - - - - - - - - 2500 - - - - - - - -

Tables NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 T-3 Table 4 Maximum Planar Average Initial Enrichment for EOS-37PTH (2 Pages)

PWR Fuel Class Maximum Planar Average Initial Enrichment (wt. % U-235) as a Function of Soluble Boron Concentration and Basket Type (Fixed Poison Loading) With and Without CCs Minimum Soluble Boron (ppm) Basket Type A1/A2/A3/A4H/A4L/A5 B1/B2/B3/B4H/B4L/B5 w/o CCs w/ CCs w/o CCs w/ CCs INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/FAILED FUEL INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/FAILED FUEL INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/ FAILED FUEL INTACT FUEL DAMAGED/FAILED FUEL WE 14x14 Class 2000 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 2100 - - - - - - - - 2200 - - - - - - - - 2300 - - - - - - - - 2400 - - - - - - - - 2500 - - - - - - - - Notes: 1. Not analyzed.

Tables NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 T-4 Table 5 Minimum B-10 Content in the Neutron Poison Plates of the EOS-37PTH DSC Basket Type Minimum B-10 Content (areal density) for MMC (mg/cm

2) A1/A2/A3/A4H/A4L/A5 28.0 B1/B2/B3/B4H/B4L/B5 35.0 Tables NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 T-5 Table 6 Fuel Assembly Design Characteristics for the EOS-89BTH DSC BWR FUEL CLASS BWR Fuel ID Example Fuel Designs (1)(2) 7 x 7 GE-7-A GE-1, GE-2, GE-3 8 x 8 GE-8-A GE-4, XXX-RCN 8 x 8 GE-8-B GE-5, GE-Pres GE-Barrier GE-8 Type 1 8 x 8 GE-8-C GE-8 Type II 8 x 8 GE-8-D GE-9, GE-10 9 x 9 GE-9-A GE-11, GE-13 10 x 10 GE-10-A GE-12, GE-14 10 x 10 GE-10-B GNF2 7 x 7 ENC-7-A ENC-IIIA 7 x 7 ENC-7-B ENC-III ENC-IIIE ENC-IIIF 8 x 8 ENC-8-A ENC Va and Vb 8 x 8 FANP-8-A FANP 8x8-2 9 x 9 FANP-9-A FANP-9x9-79/2 FANP-9x9-72 FANP-9x9-80 FANP-9x9-81 9 x 9 FANP-9-B Siemens QFA ATRIUM 9 10 x 10 FANP-10-A ATRIUM 10 ATRIUM 10XM 8 x 8 ABB-8-A SVEA-64 8 x 8 ABB-8-B SVEA-64 10 x 10 ABB-10-A SVEA-92 SVEA-96Opt SVEA-100 10 x 10 ABB-10-B SVEA-92 SVEA-96 SVEA-100 10 x 10 ABB-10-C SVEA-96Opt2 Notes: 1. Any fuel channel average thickness up to 0.120 inch is acceptable on any of the fuel designs. 2. Example BWR fuel designs are listed herein and are not all-inclusive.

Tables NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 T-6 Table 7 Deleted Table 8 Maximum Lattice Average Initial Enrichment for EOS-89BTH DSC Basket Type Maximum Lattice Average Enrichment (1) (wt. % U-235) Minimum B-10 Areal Density (mg/cm 2) MMC BORAL A1 / A2 / A3 4.10 32.7 39.2 B1 / B2 / B3 4.45 41.3 49.6 C1 / C2 / C3 4.80 Not Allowed 60.0 Note: 1. For ABB-10-C Fuel Designs, the enrichment shall be reduced by 0.25 wt. % U-235 for Types A1 / A2 / A3 and Types C1 / C2 / C3 and reduced by 0.20 wt. % U-235 for Types B1 / B2 /

B3.

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-1 Zone Number 1 2 3 Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 1.0 2.0 1.3125 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 13 8 16 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 50.0 Figure 1A Heat Load Zone Configuration 1 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-2 Zone Number 1 2 3(1) Maximum Decay Heat, (H), (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 1.0 1.5 1.05 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 13 8 16 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 41.8 Notes: 1. The minimum cooling time for Zone 3 is shown for EOS-TC125/135 in Technical Specification 2.1. The minimum cooling time for EOS-TC108 is 5.0 years for H 1.0 kW/FA, and 8.0 years for H > 1.0 kW/FA.

Figure 1B Heat Load Zone Configuration 2 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC108/125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-3 Zone Number 1 2 3(1) Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 0.95 1.0 1.0 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 13 8 16 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 36.35 1. The minimum cooling time for Zone 3 is shown for EOS-TC125/135 in Technical Specification 2.1. The minimum cooling time for EOS-TC108 is 5.0 years.

Figure 1C Heat Load Zone Configuration 3 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC108/125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-4 Zone Number 1 2 3 Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 1.0 1.625 1.6 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 13 8 16 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 50.0(1) Notes: 1. Adjust payload to maintain total canister heat load within the specified limit.

Figure 1D Heat Load Zone Configuration 4 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-5 Zone Number 1 2 3 4 Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 0.7 0.5 2.4 0.85 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 5 6 8 18 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 41.0 Notes: 1. Adjust payload to maintain total canister heat load within the specified limit.

Figure 1E Heat Load Zone Configuration 5 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-6 Z3 Z3** Z3 Z3 Z2* Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3 Z2* Z1 Z1 Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3** Z1 Z1 Z1 Z1 Z1 Z3** Z3 Z2* Z1 Z1 Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3 Z2* Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3 Z3** Z3 (*) denotes location where INTACT or DAMAGED FUEL can be stored. (**) denotes location where INTACT or FAILED FUEL can be stored.

Zone Number 1 2(1) 3(1) Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 1.0 1.5 1.3125(2) Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 13 8 16 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 46.00 1. DAMAGED FUEL and FAILED FUEL shall not be loaded in the same DSC. 2. The maximum allowable heat load per FAILED FUEL compartment is 0.8 kW.

Figure 1F Heat Load Zone Configuration 6 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the EOS-HSM

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-7 Zone Number 1 2 3 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 13 8 16 Upper Compartment Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 1.0 1.60 1.3125 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 41.8(1) Lower Compartment Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 0.9 1.60 1.60 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 50.0(1) Notes: 1. Adjust payload to maintain total canister heat load within the specified limit.

Figure 1G Heat Load Zone Configuration 7 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the HSM-MX

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-8 Z3 Z3** Z3 Z3 Z2* Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3 Z2* Z1 Z1 Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3** Z1 Z1 Z1 Z1 Z1 Z3** Z3 Z2* Z1 Z1 Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3 Z2* Z1 Z2* Z3 Z3 Z3** Z3 (*) denotes location where INTACT or DAMAGED FUEL can be stored. (**) denotes location where INTACT or FAILED FUEL can be stored.

Zone Number 1 2(2) 3(2)(3) Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 13 8 16 Upper Compartment Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 0.8 1.50 1.50 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 41.8(1)(4) Lower Compartment Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 0.8 1.50 1.50 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 46.4(1) Notes: 1. The maximum decay heat per DSC is limited to 41.8 kW when DAMAGED or FAILED FUEL is loaded. 2. DAMAGED FUEL and FAILED FUEL shall not be loaded in the same DSC. 3. The maximum allowable heat load per FAILED FUEL is 0.8 kW. 4. Adjust payload to maintain total canister heat load within the specified limit.

Figure 1H Heat Load Zone Configuration 8 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the HSM-MX The change on this page is related to Enclosure 3 Changes Not Associated with the RSIs, Change 4.

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-9 Z5 Z4 Z5 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z3 Z2 Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z4 Z2 Z1 Z1 Z1 Z2 Z4 Z4 Z3 Z2 Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z4 Z5 Z4 Z5 Zone Number 1 2 3 4 5 Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus CCs, if included) 0.50 0.70 2.0 0.75 2.4 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 5 6 4 18 4 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 37.80 Figure 1I Heat Load Zone Configuration 9 for the EOS-37PTH DSC in the EOS-TC125/135 Stored in the HSM-MX

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-10 Heat Load Zone Configuration 1 for the EOS-89BTH DSC in the EOS-TC125 Stored in the EOS-HSM Zone Number 1 2 3 Maximum Decay Heat (1)(4) (kW/FA plus channel, if included) 0.4 0.6 0.5 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 29 20 40 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 43.6 Figure 2 EOS-89BTH DSC Heat Load Zone Configurations and Fuel Qualification (2 Pages)

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-11 Heat Load Zone Configuration 2 for the EOS-89BTH DSC in the EOS-TC108/125 Stored in the EOS-HSM Zone Number 1 2 3 (1) Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus channel, if included) 0.4 0.5 0.5 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 29 20 40 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 41.6 Heat Load Zone Configuration 3 for the EOS-89BTH DSC in the EOS-TC108/125 Stored in the EOS-HSM or HSM-MX Zone Number 1 2 3 (2) Maximum Decay Heat (kW/FA plus channel, if included) 0.36 0.4 0.4 Maximum Number of Fuel Assemblies 29 20 40 Maximum Decay Heat per DSC (kW) 34.44 Note: 1. The minimum cooling time for HLZC 2 for Zone 3 in the EOS-TC108 is 9.7 years. 2. The minimum cooling time for HLZC 3 Zone 3 in the EOS-TC108 is 9.0 years.

Figure 2 EOS-89BTH DSC Heat Load Zone Configurations and Fuel Qualification (2 Pages)

Figures NUHOMS EOS System Amendment 1 Proposed Technical Specifications - Revision 2 F-12 P P P P I I I P P I I I I I P P I I I I I P P I I I I I P P I I I P P P P Figure 3 Peripheral (P) and Inner (I) Fuel Locations for the EOS-37PTH DSC

v t e Letter Sequence Other
EPID:L-2018-LLA-0043, Package: Acceptance Review of Tn Americas LLC Application for Certificate of Compliance No. 1042, Amendment No. 1 to Nuhoms Eos System (Docket No. 72-1042, CAC No. 001028, EPID: L-2018-LLA-0043) - Request for Supplemental Information (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request Acceptance, Acceptance, Acceptance, Acceptance, Acceptance Supplement Administration Questions 21 December 2018 21 December 2018 14 January 2019 29 January 2019 29 January 2019 3 May 2019 23 May 2019 12 June 2019 Answers Results Approval Other: ML18144A087, ML18255A093, ML18255A094, ML18255A096, ML18255A097, ML18255A098, ML18255A101, ML18255A102, ML19177A014, ML20136A049, ML20136A050, ML20136A051
MONTHYEAR2019-01-14 [Table View]

ML18255A098

Text

1.1 NUHOMS

1.0 Definitions

1.1 NUHOMS

1.1 NUHOMS

1.1 NUHOMS

1.1 Definitions

1.2 NUHOMS

1.2 NUHOMS

1.3 NUHOMS

1.3 NUHOMS

1.3 NUHOMS

1.4 NUHOMS

1.4 NUHOMS

1.4 NUHOMS

1.4 NUHOMS

2.1 NUHOMS

2.1 NUHOMS

2.0 years

2.1 NUHOMS

2.2 NUHOMS

2.2 NUHOMS

2.3 NUHOMS

3.0 NUHOMS

3.0 NUHOMS

3.1 NUHOMS

3.1 NUHOMS

3.1 NUHOMS

3.1 NUHOMS

3.1 NUHOMS

3.1 NUHOMS

3.1 NUHOMS

3.2 NUHOMS

3.2 Soluble

3.2 NUHOMS

3.3 NUHOMS

3.3 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 Design

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

4.0 NUHOMS

5.0 NUHOMS

5.0 Programs

5.0 NUHOMS

5.0 NUHOMS

5.0 NUHOMS

5.0 NUHOMS

5.0 NUHOMS

5.0 NUHOMS

5.0 NUHOMS

Navigation menu

Search