ML20352A034

Clarification Call Summary Regarding Eos Amendment 2 RAI 6-4 Response and Tns Proposed Additional Change 3 (Not Related to the Rais)

ML20352A034
Person / Time
Site:	07201042
Issue date:	12/16/2020
From:	Christian Jacobs Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch
To:	Mathues G TN Americas LLC
CJJacobs - NMSS/DFM/STL - 301.415.6825
References
CAC 001028, EPID L-2019-LLA-0078
Download: ML20352A034 (3)

Text

CONVERSATION RECORD NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

DATE OF SIGNATURE TYPE OF CONVERSATION NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT ORGANIZATION E-MAIL TELEPHONE INCOMING OUTGOING SUBJECT

SUMMARY

ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)

NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIGNATURE Page 1 Continue on Page 2 E-MAIL ADDRESS Continue on Page 3 TELEPHONE NUMBER DOCKET NUMBER(S)

LICENSE NUMBER(S)

CONTROL NUMBER(S) of 12/15/2019 TN Americas LLC Clarification Call on RAI 6-4 response and non-RAI related additional change #3 for CoC 1042 EOS Amendment #2.

Participants:

TN: Prakash Narayanan, Venkata Venigalla, Phillipe Pham, Hoi Yee Tom, Jake Stefanick, Glenn Mathues, Don Shaw, Raheel Haroon, Rick Migliore NRC: Christian Jacobs, Zhian Li, Richard Chang, Darrell Dunn TN to provide a supplemental response to RAI 6-4 and supplemental information to TN's proposed additional change #3 (not related to the RAIs). This information will be provided to the NRC in January 2021.

Christian Jacobs





Glenn Mathues glenn.mathues@orano.group (410) 910-6538 72-1042 CoC 1042 EOS Amendment #2 2

12/16/2019

SUMMARY

(Continued from page 1)

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Page 2 of A clarification call held on December 15, 2020, with TN staff was requested by NRC staff seeking clarification to RAI 6-4 response and TN's proposed additional change #3 not related to the RAIs.

RAI 6-4: With respect to the loading of the reconstituted fuel assemblies (FAs), NRC staff requested that TN confirm that 12 FAs with a maximum of 10 stainless steel rods per FA or 24 FAs with a maximum of 5 stainless steel rods per FA are the only two allowable FA types. If the 12 FAs or 24 FAs are loaded in the periphery, they must be uniformly loaded consistent with the analyses provided in the peripheral locations of the 61 BTH DSC. And restrictions need to be provided for loading patterns for the allowable reconstituted FAs in the TS or instructions in the operating procedures to clearly inform the GL of the requirements.

TN agreed to provide proposed revisions to TS Section 2.3 to address the staff's concerns.

Additional TN proposed change #3 (not related to the RAIs): NRC staff requested the applicant to clarify the following:

1) required material properties of the combined shield plug inner top cover plate.

2) the Tables in Chapter 8 of the FSAR that include the required material properties as a function of temperature for the material specifications.

3) the codes or standards used to support the required material properties.

TN has agreed to provide the requested clarifications as supplemental information to TN's proposed additional change #3 (not related to the RAIs) or withdraw this requested change from EOS Amendment #2.

Any correspondence or transmittal of supplemental information should include the following:

CAC: 001028 Docket: 72-1042 EPID: L-2019-LLA-0078 2

ACTION REQUIRED (Continued from page 1)

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Page 3 of