ML19144A296

Conversation Record with G. Mathues Et Al./Tn Americas LLC Clarification Call on RAI #1 Response for CoC 1042 Eos Amendment #1, Conversation Held on 05/22/2019

ML19144A296
Person / Time
Site:	07201042
Issue date:	05/23/2019
From:	Christian Jacobs Spent Fuel Licensing Branch
To:	Mathues G TN Americas LLC
Jacobs C
References
CAC 001028, EPID L-2018-LLA-0043
Download: ML19144A296 (2)

Text

NRC FORM 699 **~**"**,.'.<. u_s_ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03-2013) f ~~

\~Yli

....... .,.o CONVERSATION RECORD 05/23/2019 NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION D E-MAIL Glenn Mathues 05/22/2019 E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING glenn.mathues@orano.group (410) 910-6538 0 OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S}

TN Americas LLC 72-1042 LICENSE NUMBER($) CONTROL NUMBER($}

CoC I 042 EOS Amendment # I SUBJECT Clarification Call on RAJ # I response for CoC 1042 EOS Amendment # 1.

Participants:

TN: Prakash Narayanan, Peter Shih, Yenkata Venigalla, Philippe Pham, Don Shaw, Hoi Yee Tom, Hui Liu, Laura Picard, Richard Migliore, Glenn Mathues, Karan Mauskar NRC: Christian Jacobs, John McKirgan, Veronica Wilson, JoAnn Ireland, Zhian Li, Jorge Solis, Ghani Zigh, Norma Garcia Santos, Yen Chen Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)

TN to provide supplemental information to RAJ # I (date not yet specified). TN requesting follow-up clarification call for RAJ 6-7 (date to be determined).

Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUM ENTING CONVERSATION Christian Jacobs SIGNATURE J.

~ I ~ , _ , . ,,___

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 1 of 2

NRC FORM699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

SUMMARY

(Continued from page 1)

A clarification call requested by TN was held on May 22, 2019, with NRC staff for two purposes:

I) TN was seeking clarification on why the proposed supplemental response to RAJ 4-6 (discussed during the May I, 20 l 9, clarification call - ADAMS Accession Number ML91923A113) would not adequately address RAI 4-6, and

2) TN proposed an approach to resolving RAJ 6-7.

RAJ 4-6: NRC staff provided clarification to TN as to why the proposed supplemental response to RAJ 4-6 would not adequately address the RAI. TN is revising their thermal model and will provide a supplemental response to adequately address NRC's concerns.

RAJ 6-7: TN provided a draft revised approach to resolving NRC concerns with regard to this RAJ. TN's draft approach can be found in ADAMS ML 19143A I I 2. NRC staff had several questions regarding the revised approach on the following topics:

- relationship between decay heat and source term

- instructions on how the users are to use the proposed table in the technical specifications (TS)

- how to treat outliers, instructions in the TS or Operating Procedures

- only using GWd units instead ofGWd/MTU units The applicant has agreed to provide supplemental information for RAJ 4-6, but has requested a follow-up clarification call on RAI 6-7 (to be scheduled).

Any correspondence or transmittal of supplemental information should include the following:

CAC: 001028 Docket: 72-1042 EPID: L-20 I 8-LLA-0043 NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 2 of 2