IR 05000454/1986002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:L-      4 74 A
~
APR 22 G86
    .
Docket No. 50-454 Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed Vice President Post Office Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Gentlemen:
1-Thank you for your letter dated March 21, 1986, informing us of the steps you have taken to correct the violations which we brought to ycur attention in Inspection Report No. 50-454/86002 forwarded by our letter dated February 20, 1986. Your response appears adequate and we will examine these matters during subsequent inspection With regards to your request for us to reconsider the classification of Violations 1 and 4, we have reviewed the violations and consider the severity levels assigned to be appropriate. While our inspection report summary indicated that these violations "were of minor safety significance," af ter the missed surveillances were satisfactorily performed, this characterization was intended to appropriately reflect the immediate impact on public safety. The severity level assigned to these violations is based on the safety significance of the regulatory requirements involved. Thus, violations 1 and 4 are of Level IV Severity as prescribed by 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, Supplement I.D. which states: " Violations involving for example: (1) A less significant violation of a Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation where the appropriate Action Statement was not satisfied within the time allotment by the Action Statemen .. ."
In the future, we will summarize our inspection findings in terms rore consistent with the terminology as contained in 10 CFR Part I trust this is responsive to your concer Should you have any additional questions please call me.
 
,
'
 
Sincerely, 807igind Si,"L'd 5 b " C' " *
Charles E. Norelius, Director Division of Reactor Projects See Attached Distribution    .
      , lle
      ~
86o4asoiss e604224$4 DR ADOCK o g\
DR -
-
 
',    :-
'
    .
,
Commonwealth Edison  2 APR 221986 Distribution cc: D. L. Farrar, Director of Nuclear Licensing V. I. Schlosser, Project Manager Gunner Sorensen, Site Project Superintendent R. E. Querio, Plant Manager DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Byron Resident Inspector, RIII Braidwood Phyllis Dunton, Attorney General's Office, Environmental Control Division D. W. Cassel, Jr. , Es Diane Chavez, DAARE/ SAFE Steve Lewis, ELD L. Olshan, NRR LPM H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance Division y'e s RIII RII RIII W^
Lerch/jlk o se K'fl0 Warnick du/n y/>. ,r
}}
}}

Revision as of 00:35, 22 July 2020

Ack Receipt of 850321 Ltr Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-454/86-02. Classification of Violations 1 & 4 Reviewed & Severity Levels Assigned Found to Be Appropriate
ML20141J501
Person / Time
Site: Byron Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/22/1986
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8604280155
Download: ML20141J501 (2)


Text

L- 4 74 A

~

APR 22 G86

.

Docket No. 50-454 Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed Vice President Post Office Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Gentlemen:

1-Thank you for your letter dated March 21, 1986, informing us of the steps you have taken to correct the violations which we brought to ycur attention in Inspection Report No. 50-454/86002 forwarded by our letter dated February 20, 1986. Your response appears adequate and we will examine these matters during subsequent inspection With regards to your request for us to reconsider the classification of Violations 1 and 4, we have reviewed the violations and consider the severity levels assigned to be appropriate. While our inspection report summary indicated that these violations "were of minor safety significance," af ter the missed surveillances were satisfactorily performed, this characterization was intended to appropriately reflect the immediate impact on public safety. The severity level assigned to these violations is based on the safety significance of the regulatory requirements involved. Thus, violations 1 and 4 are of Level IV Severity as prescribed by 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, Supplement I.D. which states: " Violations involving for example: (1) A less significant violation of a Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation where the appropriate Action Statement was not satisfied within the time allotment by the Action Statemen .. ."

In the future, we will summarize our inspection findings in terms rore consistent with the terminology as contained in 10 CFR Part I trust this is responsive to your concer Should you have any additional questions please call me.

,

'

Sincerely, 807igind Si,"L'd 5 b " C' " *

Charles E. Norelius, Director Division of Reactor Projects See Attached Distribution .

, lle

~

86o4asoiss e604224$4 DR ADOCK o g\

DR -

-

',  :-

'

.

,

Commonwealth Edison 2 APR 221986 Distribution cc: D. L. Farrar, Director of Nuclear Licensing V. I. Schlosser, Project Manager Gunner Sorensen, Site Project Superintendent R. E. Querio, Plant Manager DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Byron Resident Inspector, RIII Braidwood Phyllis Dunton, Attorney General's Office, Environmental Control Division D. W. Cassel, Jr. , Es Diane Chavez, DAARE/ SAFE Steve Lewis, ELD L. Olshan, NRR LPM H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance Division y'e s RIII RII RIII W^

Lerch/jlk o se K'fl0 Warnick du/n y/>. ,r