IR 05000382/1986031

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/86-31

ML20210A382
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	04/29/1987
From:	Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Dewease J LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8705050076
Download: ML20210A382 (2)

Text

- - - - - . .

.* >

APR 2 91987 In Reply Refer To:

Docket: 50-382/86-31

!

Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN: J. G. Dewease, Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations N-80-317 Baronne Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70160

'

Gentlemen: .

Thank you for your letter of' April 3,1987, in response to our letter and l Notice of Violation dated March 4,1987. We have reviewed your reply and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future inspection to

'

determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintaine

Sincerely,

,

S r.cd M GAG @

J. E. Gagliardo, Chief j Reactor Projects Branch cc:

Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN: G. E. Wuller, Onsite Licensing Coordinator P. O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 f

Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN: N. S. Carns, Plant Manager P. O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066

)

Middle South Services ATTN: Mr. R. T. Lally

P. O. Box 61000

,

New Orleans, Louisiana 70161 '

l <

RIV:RSB/ES ES # RF k RSB RPB 4 LDGilbert:'gb RElreTaljd g f r TJWest an JEGagli do y/d/87 y/g/87 if Lj87 7/g/87 y/g/

'

8705050076 870429 )

PDR ADOCK 05000382 / ) l G PDR , ,

- .- -

- . - - - . _

~_ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ __ .. . . - .

,

- ..

l Louisiana Power & Light Company 2

,

!

i Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN: K. W. Cook, Nuclear Safety and

.

Regulatory Affairs Manager

'

317 Baronne Street

P. O. Box 60340 New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 s

Louisiana Radiation Control Program Director

bcctoDMB(IE01)

.

bec distrib. by RIV:

, *RPB *D, Weiss, RM/ALF

• RR1 R. D. Martin, RA

'

• SectionChief(RPB/A) DRSP

• R&SPB *RSB

• MIS System * Project Inspector

• RSTS Operator *R. Hall j

• RIV File L. Gilbert

!

.

i i

!

l

,

.

'

!

.

f

!

!

f J

. *)

'

e i

!

LO POWERU ISI AN A / 317

& LIGHT NEW BARONNE

+

ORLEANS, LOUISlANASTREET P. O. BOX 60340 70160 +

(504) 595-3100 000$50i!U .

April 3, 1987 W3P87-1002 A4.05 QA U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission }@ j g g'AI 2,

ATTN: Document Control Desk '

Washington, D.C. 20555

%-6%

Subject: Waterford 3 SES

. 1 ?

j Docket No. 50-382  :

License No. NPF-38 NRC Inspection Report 86-31 Attached is the Louisiana Power and Light Company (LP&L) response to Violation Nos. 8631-01 and 8631-02 identified in Inspection Report N .

If you have any questions on the response, please contact G.E. Wuller, operational Licensing, at (504) 464-349 Very truly yours, lA1 ywm

-

K.W. Cook Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Affairs Manager KWC:KLB:ssf cc: R.D. Martin, NRC Region IV '

I G.W. Knighton, NRC-NRR J.H. Wilson, NRC-NRR NRC Resident Inspectors Office E.L. Blake W.M. Stevenson W/

"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER"

..

• • 6

Attachment to W3P87-1002 Sheet 1 of 2 LP&L Response To Violation Nos. 8631-01 and 8631-02 VIOLATION NO. 8631-01 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V; and Ebasco Specification - General Power Piping Requirements, LOU 1564-100, require that quality affecting activities be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstance and that they be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawing Contrary to the above, Station Modification SM-107, Backup Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System was not accomplished in accordance with instructions, procedures, and drawings. Listed below are examples of discrepancies between Ebasco Specification LOU-1564-100 and as-built conditions:

o Pipe Supports FSRR-4004 and CCRR-4521: Lock nuts not engaged per specifications and Cotter keys not installed properl o Pipe Support FSRR-4001: Drawing required lock nut missin o Pipe Support FSRR-4010: Drawing required weep hole not drille This is a Severity Level IV violatio RESPONSE (1) Reason for the Violation The support sketches included in the Station Modification Package (SMP) may have lacked adequate details to assure that supports were installed in accordance with design requirement l (2) Corrective Action That Has Been Taken Supports ins.alled under Station Modification 107 including the four identified in the inspection report were reinspected and the deficiencies noted in the reinspection were corrected (refer to CIWA-030338 & CIWA-032292). The design group has been directed to provide more detail and clearer directions in future design drawings for those design packages that relate to installation of support I (3) Corrective Action To Be Taken No further action is deemed necessar (4) Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved The directive was approved on March 27, 198 ]?'

cr. . '- Attachssnt to W3P87-1002

. Sheet 2 of 2 VIOLATION NO. 8631-02 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XV and site procedure QP-015-001 Nonconformances and Corrective Actions, require that measures be established to control materials, parts, or components which do not conform-to requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use or installatio Contrary to the above, the following-two examples of failure to control the use of nonconforming components were identifie o Documentation on two butt welds, FS-SM-107-M3-FW6 and FS-SM-107-M4-SW8 indicates the welds were rejected by QC'due to fit up problem Specifically, the gap opening was. greater than 5/32 of an inc Proper disposition was not documented for these nonconforming

_

conditions in that a required nonconformance report was not prepare o Welds FSRR-4002-FW-2 and FSRR-4002-FW-1 were rejected by QC, however, the weld records indicated that the completed welds were acceptable without having been reinspected by QC for the rejectable attribut This is a Severity Level IV violatio RESPONSE (1) Reason for the Violation The documentation to accept the welds identified was in the packages, however, the QC acceptance after the QC rejection was difficult to deciphe (2) Corrective Action That Has Been Taken The weld packages were reviewed by a welding engineer and QC inspectors and dispositioned acceptable as foun (3) Corrective Action To Be Taken LP&L procedure MM-1-054 is being revised to incorporate Weld Specification Documentation Sheets that will allow for better dispositioning of items in questio (4) Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved t

. The procedure is expected to be approved by April 15, 1987.

t I

.

I f

i

!

?