ML20235C978

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:35, 28 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 710428 Twx Re 710422 Inoperability of HPCI Sys. Tech Spec Section 3.5.H Incorporated to Provide Power Under Critical Conditions.Due to Higher Possibility of Malfunction During Startup Testing,Section 3.5.H Should Not Be Invoked
ML20235C978
Person / Time
Site: Monticello, 05000000
Issue date: 04/29/1971
From: Morris P
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Dienhart A
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20235B311 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-111 NUDOCS 8709250075
Download: ML20235C978 (1)


Text

_ _-. _ --_-__ - _ _ _ - - - __ _ _ _ _ - __ ___ . _ _ - _ . - _ - - . _ _ _ - - - _ _ - - - _ - - - . _ - - _ - - _ - -

Distri,bytf, on: #

Docket-AEC PDR DR Reading DRL Reading BWR-1 File FSchroeder,'DRL April 29, 1971 SHanauer, DR-

^

.TRWilson, DRL RSBoyd, DRL' Do'cket No. 50-263 RDeYoung, DRL DSkovholt, DRL EGCase, DRS JKnotts,-OGC DThompson, DRL Northern States Power Company LRogers, REP ATTN: Mr. Arthur.V. Dienhart NDube, DRL (w/3.encis) l Vice President SNKari, DRL 414 Nicollet Hall. Compliance (2)

Minneapolis, Minnesota. 55401 VBenaroya,~DRL Gentlemen ,

t Your TWK dated April 28, 1971, informed us that the HPCI system became inoperable on April 22, 1971, and stated that you would operate the plant with the HPCI system inoperable until Wednesday, May 5, 1971, in accordance with Section 3.5.H of the Technical Specifications.

Section 3.5.H is incorporated in the Technical Specifications in order to continue to provide power under certain critical conditions. Since the Monticello plant is undergoing startup tests we do not believe the provisions of this section should apply at this time. We consider the availability of safety systems'of a plant to be more essential during plant checkout, when all systems have not been completely tested, and the possibility of malfunctions occurrence is higher than during routine operation.

Accordingly, we conclude that it is not in the interest of public health and safety to invoke Section 3.5.H of the Technical Specifications and therefore conclude that the provisions 'of Section 3.5.D4 should apply.

In the near future, the Monticello Technical Specifications will be revised to make them more consistent with other facilities on areas relating to allowable equipment repair periods.  ;

Sincerely, PYri. MNs k 37 2I 6d7f .l g Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing omcz, .?RL,:B,WR ,1 ,, ,,, ,D,RL,:ByR-1, ,

, p,RL:AD:BWR DRL , DRL BEnaroya:U,s,,

_ , ,M, , ,_ _

SURNAME) x7791 g DF ut _,, ,

RSBoyd FSchroeder ,

PAMortis ,

oatt> . 4/29/7L .4f. % 71. ,,( . ..[?l. . /. . ..(?l. bl. .[?l.

n.,m.c.m . .. - . _ , . _

8709250075 B70921 g PDR FDIA HENZ87-111 PDR a

< 1