IR 05000358/1975004

Insp Rept 50-358/75-04 on 750721-23.Major Areas Inspected: Corrective Actions Taken in Response Ltr to Enforcement Items Identified in Previous Rept & Protection & Handling of Stored Equipment,Results of Audits & Qa/Qc Programs

ML20235C101
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Zimmer
Issue date:	08/14/1974
From:	Hunnicutt D, Sutton J, Vandel T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20235B311	List: IA-87-111, Submits Rept on Plant,As Discussed in ACRS 150th Meeting on 721012-14.Listed Items Can Be Resolved During Const & Facility Can Be Constructed W/Reasonable Assurance for Operation W/O Undue Risk to Public Safety IR 05000254/1972009 IR 05000358/1972003 IR 05000358/1973001 IR 05000358/1973002 IR 05000358/1973003 IR 05000358/1973005 IR 05000358/1973006 IR 05000358/1973007 IR 05000358/1974001 IR 05000358/1974002 IR 05000358/1974003 IR 05000358/1975004 ML20235B308 ML20235B364 ML20235B401 ML20235B405 ML20235B424 ML20235B456 ML20235B461 ML20235B465 ML20235B477 ML20235B488 ML20235B507 ML20235B552 ML20235B582 ML20235B585 ML20235B588 ML20235B605 ML20235B618 ML20235B623 ML20235B649 ML20235B656 ML20235B662 ML20235B670 ML20235B679 ML20235B683 ML20235B687 ML20235B702 ML20235B708 ML20235B713 ML20235B714 ML20235B718 ML20235B720 ML20235B730 ML20235B734 ML20235B748 ML20235B754 ML20235B762 ML20235B764 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-111 50-358-75-04, 50-358-75-4, NUDOCS 8709240349
Download: ML20235C101 (8)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_-_ ___ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s i ,

.
-

UNITED STATES NUCl2AR REGUIATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCDfENT RECTON III i j Report of Construction Inspection ' IE Inspection Report No. 050-358/75-04

          ,
        '

l Licensec: Cincinnati Cas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 W.11. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Licence No. CPPR-88 Moscow, Ohio Cagetory: A Type of Licensec: BUR (CE) - 807 MWo Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Dates of Inspection: July 21 - 23, 1975 Principal Inspector: }. E.sVandel {J;ls &*/V-21'

         (Date)
       .4 .- vis Nis-(

Accompanying Inspectors: D. M. l!unnicutt [M' -/,j7'15

          .
          ,

j /(Da tic) W$,h / l W. 'Sut ton T_/y O J (Date) Other Accompanying Personnel: Non ft ,fet i;1 s < i

    '
           l i  i Revicued By:
  ',

c o' D. W. Ilayes Senior Reactor Inspector

         [[/9/ /(Da t ci)

r Construction and Engineering Suppert Branch

          ,

8709240349 070921 PDR FOIA t4EN787-111 PDR ,

        -

_ _ _ _ _

     .
;.
.
 .

SUtNARY OF FIND 1_NGS

      .

Inspection Summary Inspection on July 21 - 23, (75-04): Reviewed corrective actions established in response letter to enforcement items identified in previous report and status of previously identified unresolved matter Inspected protection and handling of stored equipment, results of painting work.audits, and QA/QC program provisions for safety related Enforcement items Non _Licensco Action on Previousl,y Identified Enforcement Items l The infractions identified in IE, Inspection Report No. 050-358/75-02 and the corrective action outlined in the Cincinnati Cao and Electric Company (CC6E) Ictter of response dated June 19, 1975, were reviewed during the inspection with the following information roccive Qualit1 Assurnnce Manual - Ininnd-Ryerson, Incorporated (I-R) ! The I-R QA manual and field inspection manual are presently under review by the licensec following their requestod revision. The licennec indicated that they are not in a position at the present time to indicate the acceptability of the revised manual. Follow-up is planned during the next routine inspectio l R Mannpement QA Audits i' As was identified in the previous paragraph, the revised quality assurance manual and field inspection manual are presently under review by the licensec. Therefore, further review relative to management inspection. audits will be conducted during the next routinc Other Significant Items Systems and Components The licensco indicated that they plan to install the Reactor Pressure Vessel (IIPV) by December 1,1975. Tbc Aycock company has been contracted to provide the installation procedures and ! plans and to perform the work.

)

   -2-   l
      :

i kI _ __- ___ - _

_ _ - _

    *

{

b

!

s

  *   ,
      .
.
      . Faci?ity Items (Plan and l'rocedurcs)   .

Non ' i Managerial Itemn ! The inspector was informed by the licensee that Mr. W.11.

l Dickhoncr, formerly Executive Vice President of CCLE, has been appointed President of the company. In addition, Mr. E. Borgmann was appointed Vice President, Engineering, as of July 1, 197 Noncompliance Identified and Corrected by the Licensco Non Deviations Non F. . Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items l Dienci 011 Stornne Tanks (TE Inspection Report No. 050-358/75-03) Sargent and Lundy Engineers (SLL) issued a memo on May 8, 1975, which summarized the results of their study regarding l the diesel oil storage tanks affected by the high water Jcve The S6L conclusion was that there is no measurcabic evidence that the two undisturbed tanks had been displaced and that the hold-down straps are not required for scismic restrain This resolves the concern identified in the previous inspection repor . Drawinn Control (IE Inspection Reports No. 050-358/75-03 and No. 050-358/75-01) The inspector reviewed a memo dated April 23, 1975, issued by the Kaiser Engineers, Incorporated (KEI) QA manager instructing all personnel regarding the procedure to be used for special requests of drawings. In addition, the inspector was informed that a training session relative to the special request drawing control was held on May 12, 1975, with the personnel on the memo distribution list attending. An audit was performed on June 3,1975, to evaluate compliance (mistakes were identified that were corrected). The KEI QA manager said that further audits , ' and surveillance activity will be conducted to assurc adequato compliance. This matter is considered to be close !

   -3-

! l l

_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,
.
* The inspector examined selected CSK drawings and determlncd that a new stmnping system isused    now being thatonl use identifics the field sketch drawings for
   .

construction being utilized to further identify those , and

        .

drawing the alphanumeric inspector as follows:numbering system was eidentifi to the d

     '

SSK - CSK - Structural Sketches PSK - Civil Sketches Piping Sketches ISK - Instrumental' ion Sketches This matter is considered to be close Design Chan.ges (IE Inspection Reports No and No. 050-358/75-01) . 050-358/75-03 The S&L response to the licensce relative to a d esign revision The licensee representative indicated , 197 esponse and that the rer

,

matter is considered to be closed. action taken . This was cons

Procedure Reports N for Storanc and llandlinn of Piye nspection

     ,_
      (IE I 050-358/75-03 and No. 050-358/75-01)

for review, comment,KEI work instruction QACMI No. SM-3, R

      , was issued This instruction, including Appendix A "End Cland approval at !t    ;

concern when approved and issued. appeared ve the to provide a Manarement Interview ( conclusion of the inspection.The following persons attended a\ ew held at the _ Cincinnati Gas & Elcetric Comnany (CGf.El W. H. Dickhonor President  ! E. A. Borgmann,,Vice President, Engineering l I E.Engineer C. Pandorf, Principal Quality Assurance and St andards

         \

_ Raiser Engineers Incorporated (KEI) i W. F. Frcidrich, Quality Assurance Manager - Site

         '

*    -4-      l

         !

l

   .

s

,._.___-.,nn g _ AkN ' -
  -~~*~~- - - . -
    -

- _ . _ _ -_ _ . _ . . -- . . _ _ -- _ .

    .
.
"[:
-.i
.

4

, . Matters discussed 'and cormients.. on' the part of management
  ' personnel, were as follows:

1.- 'The inspector stated that the two infractions identified'in ;

       *
   .the last inspection report would remain open pending further'

revlcw since the action taken to resolve them is still in prc3ress. The: inspector added that it was his undcratanding

,

that.the I-R revised quality assurance manual.and fic1d

   . installation manual review was to be completed by both S6L:

and CG6E. 'The licensee indicated that this was correc . The inspector also indicated that the unresolved matters from the previous inspection appear to have been resolved satis-factoril . The inspector stated that the principal inspector assignment for Zimmer was being transferred to T. E..Vandel and that further responsibility for NRC construction inspections and-other activity would be carried out by hi . The' licensee representatives were informed that a review was performed of the safety related coatings QA program, procedurcs, and specifications and that no apparent probicm areas were-identified, i f

-

       :
       !
     - 5-  }

i

       .

i

       : i s h u- a_. e ,, : l, .J: m ',
      '
       .{ }

I- ! +

. .
     .. ,
,

a R EPORT D E,'t,'A T LS Pornona contacted The follow 1na persons, in addition to individuals listed cadcr the Manancment Interview section of this report, worc contacted during the innpcetio I _Ci n c i n_na t i Cas and I:lectric Company (CC6E) l W. W. Schwiers, ric1d Project Engineer R. I, Wood, Quality Assurance and Standards Engineer  ! R. P. Ehns, Quality Assurance and Standards Engineer j Cencral Elec_tric Company (CE) - Nuclear Energy Division l I W. Crcur., Site Manager l Kaiser Engineers d incorporated (KEI)

 ~ 11. R:. Cc,od, inspection Supervisor M. C. Franchuk, Mechanical Quality Assurance Engineer W. A. Ferrec, Superintendent -

Warehousing M.11. Davin, Warehousing Supervivor ' II. C. tht,t;tjnn Comp,at,Lvlut ting) A. J. Bruento, Laboratory Chief Ili!1 top Concreto Corporation (llillton) D. McKinley, Supervinor In l and_-Rye rson , Incorporated (T-R), l D. R. Rayka, Project Superintendent i Results of Inngection Project Status The inspector was informed that the Zinner project is 30% cociplete j In addition, it was stated that approximately 50,000 cubic yards of concrete remain to be placed. The present activities include second-Icvel work for the RilR area and painting also work is now beginning , on the sacrificial shield. Presently, the fuel load date is April 1, i 1978.

l l l -6- !

      '.*

J=__________ * ~ ~ * ~~ i

      '

_ _- ___-

.
.
.+        i L! . l l Coatings
,

The: inspector reviewed the following specifications and instructions for coatings (painting) of Clasa I structures and components: Specification Power Station11-2174, Building. Work for Um. 11. Zimmer Nuc1 car

    -

Unit . Form 1791 - Standard Specification for Field Paintin Construction Inspection Plan, QA tbnual, KE QA Program - Carbolin The above specifications and instructions were found to comply with the appropriate recommendations and requirements of: (1) Regulatory Guido 1.54 "QA Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied ANSI to Water-Cooled N10 Nuclear Power Plants. -June 1973"; 1972; (3) ANaI N101.2; (2)

     (4) ANSI N5.12; (5) SSPC-PA.2-73T (Stoc1' Strut.tures Painting Council) dated September 1, 1973; (6) 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B; and (7)

Cuidance on QA Requirements 1)uring the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants. WASil-1309, dated May 10, 1974 The QA program for receipt; materials verifications; materials storage; of paint surface preparation; painters' qualifications; application to concreto and steci surfaces; time, temperature, and humidity restrictions for both surfaces and materials;-inspection; records and documentation; and final acceptance subsequent to completion of required painting vore connidered adequate for the

 .licensco commitment . _S to ra ne
.

i The inspector observed the onsite storage of equipment and offsite storage of equipment at the BESL varchouse building loented in Cincinnat (QACMI-G3) appeared to be in order.The KEI storage protection and inspection The inspection record cards were found to be availabic for inspection at the stored equipment site Access control to the storage arcas was discussed with I ' the utility representatives, with no prob 1cm areas being idcntified . G

       '

I 7-

       ,

I _ _ _ >

__- O

*
..

! o T (L

,

e 4 Auditn Reports of audits perforeted by CCLE QA personnel .since the last IE inspection were reviewed by the inspector. The'following site-audits were conducted and were considered to be performed according to CCLE and KEI audit procedurc Maintenance of stored equipmen Painting and pipe hanger Construction Inspection Plan AP-10 and 11 (Surveillance of KEI Auditors) Bristol Steel Activitics, Valdinner-Young L Bortko QA Program KEI Storage for Carbon Steel Pipin I

   .

r i I I I l

1 I i l

     ,

O-8-l

      .
      ,  -,

i gips _wsnn n kk :'-' O E ~ W" " "

  - "

}}