IR 05000358/1975004
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_-_ ___ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s i , . UNITED STATES NUCl2AR REGUIATORY COMMISSION - OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCDfENT RECTON III i j Report of Construction Inspection ' IE Inspection Report No. 050-358/75-04 , ' l Licensec: Cincinnati Cas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 W.11. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Licence No. CPPR-88 Moscow, Ohio Cagetory: A Type of Licensec: BUR (CE) - 807 MWo Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Dates of Inspection: July 21 - 23, 1975 }. s {J;ls Principal Inspector: E. Vandel &*/V-21' (Date) .4 vis Nis-( [M' -/,j7'15 .- Accompanying Inspectors: D. M. l!unnicutt . j /(Da tic) l , W$,h / W. 'Sut ton T_/y O J (Date) Other Accompanying Personnel: None.
l ft,fet i;1 s < i i ' i c ' D. W. Ilayes [[/9/V.C Revicued By: o ', Senior Reactor Inspector /(Da t ci) r Construction and Engineering Suppert Branch , 8709240349 070921 PDR FOIA t4EN787-111 PDR , - _ _ _ _ _
.
- .
. . SUtNARY OF FIND 1_NGS . Inspection Summary Inspection on July 21 - 23, (75-04): Reviewed corrective actions established in response letter to enforcement items identified in previous report and status of previously identified unresolved matters.
Inspected protection and handling of stored equipment, results of audits, and QA/QC program provisions for safety related painting work.
Enforcement items None.
_Licensco Action on Previousl,y Identified Enforcement Items l The infractions identified in IE, Inspection Report No. 050-358/75-02 and the corrective action outlined in the Cincinnati Cao and Electric Company (CC6E) Ictter of response dated June 19, 1975, were reviewed during the inspection with the following information roccived.
A.
Qualit1 Assurnnce Manual - Ininnd-Ryerson, ! Incorporated (I-R) The I-R QA manual and field inspection manual are presently under review by the licensec following their requestod revision.
The licennec indicated that they are not in a position at the present time to indicate the acceptability of the revised manual.
Follow-up l is planned during the next routine inspection.
B.
1-R Mannpement QA Audits i ' As was identified in the previous paragraph, the revised quality assurance manual and field inspection manual are presently under review by the licensec. Therefore, further review relative to management audits will be conducted during the next routinc inspection.
Other Significant Items A.
Systems and Components The licensco indicated that they plan to install the Reactor Pressure Vessel (IIPV) by December 1,1975. Tbc Aycock company has been contracted to provide the installation procedures and plans and to perform the work.
! ) -2-l
ik I _ __- ___ - _
_ _ - _ {
b ! s
, . . . B.
Faci?ity Items (Plan and l'rocedurcs) . None.
' i C.
Managerial Itemn ! The inspector was informed by the licensee that Mr. W.11.
l Dickhoncr, formerly Executive Vice President of CCLE, has been appointed President of the company.
In addition, Mr. E. A.
Borgmann was appointed Vice President, Engineering, as of July 1, 1975.
D.
Noncompliance Identified and Corrected by the Licensco None.
E.
Deviations None.
F.
l . Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items 1.
Dienci 011 Stornne Tanks (TE Inspection Report No. 050-358/75-03) Sargent and Lundy Engineers (SLL) issued a memo on May 8, 1975, which summarized the results of their study regarding l the diesel oil storage tanks affected by the high water Jcvel.
The S6L conclusion was that there is no measurcabic evidence that the two undisturbed tanks had been displaced and that the hold-down straps are not required for scismic restraint.
This resolves the concern identified in the previous inspection report.
2.
Drawinn Control (IE Inspection Reports No. 050-358/75-03 and No. 050-358/75-01) The inspector reviewed a memo dated April 23, 1975, issued a.
by the Kaiser Engineers, Incorporated (KEI) QA manager instructing all personnel regarding the procedure to be used for special requests of drawings.
In addition, the inspector was informed that a training session relative to the special request drawing control was held on May 12, 1975, with the personnel on the memo distribution list attending. An audit was performed on June 3,1975, to evaluate compliance (mistakes were identified that were corrected). The KEI QA manager said that further audits and surveillance activity will be conducted to assurc , ' adequato compliance. This matter is considered to be closed.
! -3- ! l l
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . h.
- The inspector examined selected CSK drawings and determlncd that a new stmnping system is now being that identifics the field sketch drawings for used use only.
being utilized to further identify those drawing . construction the alphanumeric numbering system was identifi d . , and inspector as follows: e to the ' SSK Structural Sketches - CSK Civil Sketches - PSK Piping Sketches - ISK Instrumental' ion Sketches - This matter is considered to be closed.
3.
Design Chan.ges (IE Inspection Reports No and No. 050-358/75-01) 050-358/75-03 . The S&L response to the licensce relative to a d The licensee representative indicated that the rer esign revision , 1975.
matter is considered to be closed. action taken was cons esponse and , This .
Procedure for Storanc and llandlinn of Piye (IE I Reports No.
050-358/75-03 and No. 050-358/75-01) ,_ nspection for review, comment,KEI work instruction QACMI No. SM-3, R , was issued This instruction, including Appendix A "End Cland approval at t
concern when approved and issued. appeared to provide a ! ve the Manarement Interview ( A.
conclusion of the inspection.The following persons attended a \\ ew held at the _ Cincinnati Gas & Elcetric Comnany (CGf.El W. H. Dickhonor President ! E. A. Borgmann,,Vice President, l Engineering E. C. Pandorf, Principal Quality Assurance and St I Engineer andards _ Raiser Engineers Incorporated (KEI) \\ i W. F. Frcidrich, Quality Assurance Manager - Site
' -4-l
! l . s ,._.___-.,nn g _ AkN ' - -~~*~~- - - . - -
- _. _ _ -_ _. _.. --.. _ _ -- _ . . . "[: -.i .
4 , B.
. Matters discussed 'and cormients.. on' the part of management ' personnel, were as follows: 1.- 'The inspector stated that the two infractions identified'in
.the last inspection report would remain open pending further' revlcw since the action taken to resolve them is still in prc3ress. The: inspector added that it was his undcratanding that.the I-R revised quality assurance manual.and fic1d , . installation manual review was to be completed by both S6L: and CG6E. 'The licensee indicated that this was correct.
2.
The inspector also indicated that the unresolved matters from the previous inspection appear to have been resolved satis-factorily.
3.
The inspector stated that the principal inspector assignment for Zimmer was being transferred to T. E..Vandel and that further responsibility for NRC construction inspections and-other activity would be carried out by him.
4.
The' licensee representatives were informed that a review was performed of the safety related coatings QA program, procedurcs, and specifications and that no apparent probicm areas were-identified, i f
-
! 5- } - i . i
i s h u-e ,, : l, .J: m ', .{ } ' a I- ! + . . , .. , a R EPORT D E,'t,'A T LS Pornona contacted The follow 1na persons, in addition to individuals listed cadcr the Manancment Interview section of this report, worc contacted during the innpcetion.
I _Ci n c i n_na t i Cas and I:lectric Company (CC6E) l W. W. Schwiers, ric1d Project Engineer R. I, Wood, Quality Assurance and Standards Engineer ! R. P. Ehns, Quality Assurance and Standards Engineer j Cencral Elec_tric Company (CE) - Nuclear Energy Division l I W. Crcur., Site Manager l Kaiser Engineers d incorporated (KEI) ~ 11. R:. Cc,od, inspection Supervisor M. C. Franchuk, Mechanical Quality Assurance Engineer W. A. Ferrec, Superintendent Warehousing - M.11. Davin, Warehousing Supervivor ' II. C. tht,t;tjnn Comp,at,Lvlut ting) A. J. Bruento, Laboratory Chief Ili!1 top Concreto Corporation (llillton) D. McKinley, Supervinor In l and_-Rye rson, Incorporated (T-R), l D. R. Rayka, Project Superintendent i Results of Inngection 1.
Project Status The inspector was informed that the Zinner project is 30% cocipleted.
j In addition, it was stated that approximately 50,000 cubic yards of concrete remain to be placed. The present activities include second-Icvel work for the RilR area and painting also work is now beginning , on the sacrificial shield. Presently, the fuel load date is April 1, i 1978.
l l l-6- ! '.*
~ ~ * ~~ i J=___________.. '
_ _- ___- . . .+ i L!. l.
l l 2.
Coatings The: inspector reviewed the following specifications and instructions for coatings (painting) of Clasa I structures and components: , a.
Specification 11-2174, Building. Work for Um. 11. Zimmer Nuc1 car Power Station Unit 1.
- . b.
Form 1791 Standard Specification for Field Painting.
- Construction Inspection Plan, c.
d.
QA tbnual, KEI.
c.
QA Program Carbolino.
- The above specifications and instructions were found to comply with the appropriate recommendations and requirements of: Regulatory Guido 1.54 "QA Requirements for Protective Coatings (1) Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants. -June 1973"; ANSI N101.4 (2) 1972; (3) ANaI N101.2; (4) ANSI N5.12; - (5) SSPC-PA.2-73T (Stoc1' Strut.tures Painting Council) dated September 1, 1973; (6) 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B; and (7) Cuidance on QA Requirements 1)uring the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants. WASil-1309, dated May 10, 1974 The QA program for receipt; materials verifications; materials storage; surface preparation; painters' qualifications; application of paint to concreto and steci surfaces; time, temperature, and humidity restrictions for both surfaces and materials;-inspection; records and documentation; and final acceptance subsequent completion of required painting vore connidered adequate for the to .licensco commitments.
3.
_S to ra ne i The inspector observed the onsite storage of equipment and offsite . storage of equipment at the BESL varchouse building loented in Cincinnati.
(QACMI-G3) appeared to be in order.The KEI storage protection and inspection The inspection record cards were found to be availabic for inspection at the stored equipment sites.
Access control to the storage arcas was discussed with I ' the utility representatives, with no prob 1cm areas being idcntified . G I ' 7- , I _ _ _ >
__- O
.. ! o (L T , e
Auditn Reports of audits perforeted by CCLE QA personnel.since the last IE inspection were reviewed by the inspector.
The'following site-audits were conducted and were considered to be performed according to CCLE and KEI audit procedurcs.
Maintenance of stored equipment.
a.
b.
Painting and pipe hangers.
Construction Inspection Plan AP-10 and 11 c.
(Surveillance of KEI Auditors) d.
Bristol Steel Activitics, Valdinner-Young L Bortko QA Program c.
t.
KEI Storage for Carbon Steel Piping.
I . r i I I I l
1 I i l , O-8-l . i gips _wsnn n kk :'-' O E ~ W" " " " , -, - }}