IR 05000358/1973002

Insp Rept 50-358/73-02 on 730125.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Audit Procedures & Techniques Used at Inland-Ryerson Const Products Co Plant

ML20235B868
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Zimmer
Issue date:	02/07/1973
From:	Vandel T, Vetter W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20235B311	List: IA-87-111, Submits Rept on Plant,As Discussed in ACRS 150th Meeting on 721012-14.Listed Items Can Be Resolved During Const & Facility Can Be Constructed W/Reasonable Assurance for Operation W/O Undue Risk to Public Safety IR 05000254/1972009 IR 05000358/1972003 IR 05000358/1973001 IR 05000358/1973002 IR 05000358/1973003 IR 05000358/1973005 IR 05000358/1973006 IR 05000358/1973007 IR 05000358/1974001 IR 05000358/1974002 IR 05000358/1974003 IR 05000358/1975004 ML20235B308 ML20235B364 ML20235B401 ML20235B405 ML20235B424 ML20235B456 ML20235B461 ML20235B465 ML20235B477 ML20235B488 ML20235B507 ML20235B552 ML20235B582 ML20235B585 ML20235B588 ML20235B605 ML20235B618 ML20235B623 ML20235B649 ML20235B656 ML20235B662 ML20235B670 ML20235B679 ML20235B683 ML20235B687 ML20235B702 ML20235B708 ML20235B713 ML20235B714 ML20235B718 ML20235B720 ML20235B730 ML20235B734 ML20235B748 ML20235B754 ML20235B762 ML20235B764 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-111 50-358-73-02, 50-358-73-2, NUDOCS 8709240262
Download: ML20235B868 (6)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ . . -. - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _. _ - _ _ .

.; . .

. .

.

U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION . ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - -

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS

REGION III

REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION RO Inspection Report No. 050-358/73-02 Licensee: Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 William H. Zimmer Nucicar Power Station License No. CPPR-88 Moscow, Ohio Category: A Type of Licensee: BWR (GE) - 807 Mwe Type of Inspection: Licensee Vendor Audit Surveillance Inland Ryerson Steel Company Melrose Park, Illinois i

Date of Inspection: January 25, 1973 Dates of Previous Inspection: Januar,y 18 - 19, 1973 i

1. r .< / '

p' l Pr1ncipal Inspector: el ,[-' /- M i (Date) l

'

Accompanying Inspectors: None

{

l

)

.

I Other Accompanying Personnel: None  !

Reviewed By: W.E.Vetter, Chief [ d '[~ I3 Reactor Construction Branch (Date) l l i j i l

.

l

.

h9E 2 87092) '

(1ENZO7-331 PDR[

]

_____ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - -

. -

-

. .

.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Enforcement Action Violations No violations of AEC requirements were identified, Safety Matters No immediate, significant safety matters were encountered during j the inspectio Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters Not applicabl Unusual Occurrences No unusual occurrences were identified during the inspectio Other Significant Findings Current Findings Purchase Order Status The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (CG&E) awarded purchase order No. 2091 dated November 14, 1972, to the Inland-Ryerson Construction Freducts Company (I-R) for the containment vessel post tensioning tendon f abricatica and installatio The order included quality requirements identified by Section 13-1 of the Sargent and Lundy (S&L) Specification No. H-217 I-R has issued an initial order for material. Tendon production scheduling is being delayed pending receipt of delivery infor-matio I _L.icensee Audits i

The I-R quality assurance proposal, included with the bid i

{

package submitted to CG&E, has been reviewed by both S&L and j CG&E and has been determined to be adequate in terms of scope of QA coverage. This determination was acknowledged by S&L i letter dated December 26, 197 .

-2-

,

-

I

- _ _ - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --

.

... . .

I The January 25, 1973, audic was conducted to determine the adequacy of the IRC implementation of a production shop manua No significant inadequacies were identified by the licensee representative. However, a change of warding, in Chapter III of the shop nanual, was requested during the management interview conducted by the licensee representative.

! Unresolved Matters

!

l l No unresolved matters were identified by the RO inspector.

1 Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Matters Not applicabl Management nterview The following persons attended a management interview which was conducted by the licensee representatives at the conclusion of their audi Inland-Ryerson Construction Products Company (I-R)

T. M. Brown, Marketing and Sales Engineer - Post Tensioning Division R. S. De Cheske, Coordinator - Quality Assurance - Post Tensioning Division The principal topics of discussion by the licensee representatives and comments by I-R management personnel were as follows:

The licensee representative commented that the shop manual, as well as implementation of the manual requirements, appeared to be acceptable. However, it was requested that Chapter III of the manual be reworded in the next revision to more clearly define component drawing and to describe, in more detail, the required design review of component drawings. The I-R QA coordinator agreed to accomodate this reques i The licensee representative also requested that the field QA manual be written to include drawing control change authorization procedure The I-R QA coordinator agreed to this reques i

.

-3-

.

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - -

-_

.. 1

.. , I i

!

\ .

3. The RO inspector conducted.a separate management interview ~ ~ ~

at the conclusion of the inspection with the following

~

i personnel in attendance: i J. H. Hoffman, CG&E Quality Assurance Engineer M. E. Schuster, S&L Quality Assurance Coordinator

'

The inspector stated that he had no adverse comments and that he felt the audit was conducted in a thorough manne .

.

l

!.

p

!

,

i l

' -l

!

!

.

'

' I t

!

!

-4- l

-

l \

]

.

__C

. .

,

• *

,:

REPORT DETAILS

.

Persons Contacted L

No individuals other than those listed under the Management Interview Section of this report were contacted during the inspectio Results of Inspection Licensee Audit Checklist *

The RO inspector determined that the following gdidelines and reference material, used by the licensee representative during the conduct of the audit, was appropriate and adequate, A five-page, generic checklist for evaluation of a vendor's QA progra Purchase order No. 2091, dated November 14, 197 L Section 13-1 of the S&L Specification No. H-217 . Vendor Program Review The licensee representative's audit of the vendor's QA program g included the followin Shop Manual A review of the vendor's shop manual produced discussion l j

pertinent to the following chapters: (1) Chapter I, '

Organization; (2) Chapter II, Design Control; (3) Chapter III, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawfugs; (4) Chapter IV, Document Control; and (5) Chapter XIII, Documentatio y i

Only the discussion concerning the definition of component I drawings and the design review controls prompted comment j on the part of the licensee representative. A consensus was that more detailed information should be provide Shop Tour .

i The licensee representatives were escorted on a tour of the  ;

shop facilities. The following areas and activities were observed: (1) received materials area, (2) testing area-5-

.

.

i

_ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - -

____ .

-

, . ,

p ...r .

.:..

.

F where physical tests. (two iper- real). are conducted on each

.

/ *- reel'ofttendon wire"and calibration of. testing equipment

• l . is-carried out,~(3):the tendon. assembly area whereLbutton L . heat, fabrication and inspection'is accomplished, and

'

. (4) the packaging and shipping area.. No comment wcs made-by:the licensee representative Records Review

'

The vendor.QA coordinator displayed the records maintained by his staff for'each job, describing how; (1) the material and shop records.are generated, reviewed, and copies dis-

'tributed to the customer with each shipment, (2) how the field installation records are generated and returned to the shop for1 permanent storage, and (3) how the complete l set of records for each job are summarized on final record - .

sheets (copies:of.which are also sent to the customer).

No comment was made by the licensee representatives.

..

N

% '

.

I

'

\

!

' i

)

!.

.

-6- i I ;

.

. .I