IR 05000358/1973002
Text
_ _ _ _ _.
_.
.
-.
-.. _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
_.
_ - _ _.
.;.
a.
.
.
.
.
U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
. ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - -
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS
REGION III
REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION RO Inspection Report No. 050-358/73-02 Licensee: Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 William H. Zimmer Nucicar Power Station License No. CPPR-88 Moscow, Ohio Category: A Type of Licensee:
BWR (GE) - 807 Mwe Type of Inspection:
Licensee Vendor Audit Surveillance Inland Ryerson Steel Company Melrose Park, Illinois i
Date of Inspection:
January 25, 1973 Dates of Previous Inspection:
Januar,y 18 - 19, 1973 i
- r.< /
p'
l
'
Pr1ncipal Inspector:
T.
el
,[- /- M
'
i (Date)
l l
'
Accompanying Inspectors: None
{
)
.
I Other Accompanying Personnel: None
!
Reviewed By:
W.E.Vetter, Chief [
d '[~ I3 Reactor Construction Branch (Date)
l j
i i
.
l
.
h9E 2 87092)
'
(1ENZO7-331 PDR[
]
_____
_
_ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. - -
-
.
-
.
.
.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Enforcement Action A.
Violations No violations of AEC requirements were identified, b.
Safety Matters No immediate, significant safety matters were encountered during j
the inspection.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters Not applicable.
Unusual Occurrences No unusual occurrences were identified during the inspection.
Other Significant Findings A.
Current Findings 1.
Purchase Order Status The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (CG&E) awarded purchase order No. 2091 dated November 14, 1972, to the Inland-Ryerson Construction Freducts Company (I-R) for the containment vessel post tensioning tendon f abricatica and installation.
The order included quality requirements identified by Section 13-1 of the Sargent and Lundy (S&L) Specification No. H-2174.
I-R has issued an initial order for material.
Tendon production scheduling is being delayed pending receipt of delivery infor-mation.
I 2.
_L.icensee Audits i
i The I-R quality assurance proposal, included with the bid
{
package submitted to CG&E, has been reviewed by both S&L and CG&E and has been determined to be adequate in terms of scope j
i of QA coverage.
This determination was acknowledged by S&L letter dated December 26, 1972.
.
-2-
,
-
I
- _ _ - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - -
-
-- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
.
...
.
.
I The January 25, 1973, audic was conducted to determine the adequacy of the IRC implementation of a production shop manual.
No significant inadequacies were identified by the licensee representative. However, a change of warding, in Chapter
-
III of the shop nanual, was requested during the management interview conducted by the licensee representative.
!
B.
Unresolved Matters
!
l l
No unresolved matters were identified by the RO inspector.
C.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Matters Not applicable.
Management nterview A.
The following persons attended a management interview which was conducted by the licensee representatives at the conclusion of their audit.
Inland-Ryerson Construction Products Company (I-R)
T. M. Brown, Marketing and Sales Engineer - Post Tensioning Division R. S. De Cheske, Coordinator - Quality Assurance - Post Tensioning Division B.
The principal topics of discussion by the licensee representatives and comments by I-R management personnel were as follows:
1.
The licensee representative commented that the shop manual, as well as implementation of the manual requirements, appeared to be acceptable.
However, it was requested that Chapter III of the manual be reworded in the next revision to more clearly define component drawing and to describe, in more detail, the required design review of component drawings. The I-R QA coordinator agreed to accomodate this request.
i 2.
The licensee representative also requested that the field QA manual be written to include drawing control change authorization procedures.
The I-R QA coordinator agreed to this request.
i
.
-3-
.
__ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - -
-_
..
I
..
,
i
!
\\.
3.
The RO inspector conducted.a separate management interview
~
~
~
at the conclusion of the inspection with the following
~
i personnel in attendance:
i J. H. Hoffman, CG&E Quality Assurance Engineer M. E. Schuster, S&L Quality Assurance Coordinator
'
The inspector stated that he had no adverse comments and that he felt the audit was conducted in a thorough manner.
.
.
l
!.
p
!
,
i l-l
'
!
!
.
I
'
'
t
!
!
-4-l l
\\
-
]
. __C
.
.
,
,:
REPORT DETAILS
.
Persons Contacted L
No individuals other than those listed under the Management Interview Section of this report were contacted during the inspection.
Results of Inspection 1.
Licensee Audit Checklist
The RO inspector determined that the following gdidelines and reference material, used by the licensee representative during the conduct of the audit, was appropriate and adequate, A five-page, generic checklist for evaluation of a vendor's a.
QA program.
b.
Purchase order No. 2091, dated November 14, 1972.
L
c.
Section 13-1 of the S&L Specification No. H-2174.
2.
Vendor Program Review The licensee representative's audit of the vendor's QA program g
included the following.
a.
Shop Manual l
A review of the vendor's shop manual produced discussion j
pertinent to the following chapters:
(1) Chapter I,
'
Organization; (2) Chapter II, Design Control; (3) Chapter III, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawfugs; (4) Chapter IV, Document Control; and (5) Chapter XIII, Documentation.
y i
Only the discussion concerning the definition of component I
drawings and the design review controls prompted comment j
on the part of the licensee representative. A consensus was that more detailed information should be provided.
b.
Shop Tour
.
i The licensee representatives were escorted on a tour of the
shop facilities. The following areas and activities were observed:
(1) received materials area, (2) testing area-5-
.
.
i
_ _. _ _... _ _ _ _ _. - - - - -
____.
-
,
.
,
.:..
...r
.
p
.
F where physical tests. (two iper-real). are conducted on each
.
/ *-
reel'ofttendon wire"and calibration of. testing equipment
- l
. is-carried out,~(3):the tendon. assembly area whereLbutton L
. heat, fabrication and inspection'is accomplished, and
'
. (4) the packaging and shipping area..
No comment wcs made-by:the licensee representatives.
c.
Records Review
'
The vendor.QA coordinator displayed the records maintained by his staff for'each job, describing how; (1) the material and shop records.are generated, reviewed, and copies dis-
'tributed to the customer with each shipment, (2) how the field installation records are generated and returned to the shop for1 permanent storage, and (3) how the complete l
set of records for each job are summarized on final record -
.
sheets (copies:of.which are also sent to the customer).
No comment was made by the licensee representatives.
..
N
% '
I
.
'
\\
!'
i
!.
)
.
-6-i I
.
.
.I