ML20151B430

Forwards Commonwealth of PA Comments on Revised Plan for Restart of Plant & List of Issues to Which NRC Will Respond

ML20151B430
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	07/12/1988
From:	Russell W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	Corbin McNeil PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20151B434	List: ML20151B430 ML20151B439
References
NUDOCS 8807200365
Download: ML20151B430 (3)

Text

e

.l I

u

'\

I

.4..

12 JUL 1988 Docket Nos. 50-277

.50-278 Philadelphia Electric Company ATTN: Mr. C. A. McNeill Executive Vice President-N1 clear 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Gentlemen- ,

Sut, ject: State of Pennsylvania Comments on Lthe Revised Plan for the Restart of Peach Bottom Atomic power Station Enclosed for your information and use t'n revising the subject plan is Mr. Morey M. Myers' letter from the Office of General Counse.1,' dated June 16, 1988 forwarding to NRC the comments of the Commonwealth of-Pennsylvania on the plan.

Also enclosed is a list of those issues included in the letter for which the NRC will respond to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania directly as appropriate. These issues can generally be grouped into the following categorits:

1. Predecisional NRC information provided by PECo ss requested by the NRC.for use in making an enforcement decision about individual ,

operator culpability.

2. Information describing the NRC approach to the review of the PECo plan.

3. Information describing and justifying NRC technical specification requirements, inspection programs,fstate programs, and generic l programs such as the Mark I containment integrity. '

While you may dish to comment on these issues as appropriate, the NRC does not expect you to respond to such matters regarding NRC requirements and policy.

l 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY REVISED PB RESTART PLAN - 0001.0.0

-8807200365 DR 890712 ~

/ / i ADOCK 05000277 / -

PDQ y

/ &. }-(( ---- -- - _ - - --

,- . . .- . . ~

Philadelphia Electric Company 2

. 42 JUL b

-Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGED BY:

JAMES M. /EAN W. T. Russell r Regional Administrater

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/ enc 1:

John S. Kemper, Sr., Senior Vice President-Nuclear J. W. Gallagher, Vice President, Nuclear Services E. C. Kistner,. Chairman, Nuclear Review Board Dickinson M. Smith, Vice President, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Jack Urban, General Mana.ger, . Fuels Department, Delmarva Power & Light-Co.

John F. Franz, Plant Manager, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Troy B. Conner, Jr. , Esquire W. H. Hirst, Director,. Joint Generation Projects Department, Atlantic Electric Bryan W. Gorman, Manager, External Affairs .

Eugene J. Bradley, Esquire, . Assistant General Counsel (Without Report)

Raymond L. Hovis, Esquire Thomas Magette, Power Plant Siting, Nuclear Evaluations W. M. Alden, Director, Licensing Section Doris Poulsen, Secretary of Harford County Council Dave Honan Public Document Room (PDR) local Public Document Room (LPOR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) l NRC Resident Inspector Commonwealth of Pennsylvania bec w/ encl:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)

Section Chief, DRP PA0 (2) SALP and All Inspection Reports Robert J. Bores, DRSS B. Clayton, ED0 RI: R R. RA Li /ille/rbl r K e Al an ossell 7/ 88 7/ /88 .7/G /88 7/ld8 7/)2Wf8 -

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY REVISED PB RESTART PLAN - 0002.0.0 07/07/88

~1

(

l l

1 PENNSYLVANIA COMMENTS ON PEACH BOTTOM RESTART PLAN TO WHICH NRC WILL RESPOND ITEM PAGE DESCRIPTION

1. 5 Technical Specification organizational changes.

potentially raise Health and Safety concerns.

2. 7 Standards NRC will Use to Judge Restart Plan Management Issues, NRC Policies on Management.

3. 7 NRC acceptance of PECo root cause analysis.

4. 7 Idencify NRC personnel judging plan acceptability and performing reviews.

5. 7 Provide memorandum of agreement between NRC and INPO.

6. 8 Provide Claims Security interviews and signed statements.

7. 16 Adequacy of Technical Specification staffing requirements.

8. 24 NRC promulgate criteria for intes.i*.y of Mark I containment.

9. 25 Involvement of Pennsylvania in verification role due to lack of confidence in NRC.

10. 26 NRC review of inspection procedures to ascertain why problems undetected.

l l

1