|
|
Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:LICENSEE: | | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 April25, 2014 LICENSEE: Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 SUBJECT |
| FACILITY SUBJECT UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 April25, 2014 Exelon Generation Company, LLC Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2
| |
|
| |
|
| ==SUMMARY== | | ==SUMMARY== |
| OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 9, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SET 23, PERTAINING TO THE BYRON STATION AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC NOS. MF1879. MF1880, MF1881, AND MF1882) The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the applicant), held a telephone conference call on April 9, 2014, to discuss and clarify the staff's draft request for additional information (ORAl), Set 23. concerning the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. | | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 9, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SET 23, PERTAINING TO THE BYRON STATION AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC NOS. MF1879. MF1880, MF1881, AND MF1882) |
| The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staff's ORAls. Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants, and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the ORAls discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary .f,v Lindsay Robinson, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-454, 50-455, 50-456, and 50-457 | | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the applicant), held a telephone conference call on April 9, 2014, to discuss and clarify the staff's draft request for additional information (ORAl), |
| | Set 23. concerning the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staff's ORAls. provides a listing of the participants, and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the ORAls discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items. |
| | The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary 1/ft/~ .f,v Lindsay Robinson, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-454, 50-455, 50-456, and 50-457 |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosures:== | | ==Enclosures:== |
| : 1. List of Participants | | : 1. List of Participants |
| : 2. List of Draft Request for Additional Information cc w/encls: Listserv April 25, 2014 LICENSEE: | | : 2. List of Draft Request for Additional Information cc w/encls: Listserv |
| Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY:
| | * ML14107A077 *concurred via email OFFICE LA:DLR PM: RPB1 :DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB1 :DLR NAME IKing LRobinson I ;DiazSanabria LRobinson JUribe for) J fRPiasse for) |
| Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2
| | DATE 4/22/14 4/24/14 4/25/14 4/25/14 |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:==
| | TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS April 9, 2014 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Lindsay Robinson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) |
| | John Wise NRC George Thomas NRC Gautam Banerjee NRC Chris Wilson Exelon Generating Company, LLC (Exelon) |
| | Don Wartel Exelon AI Fulvia Exelon Albert Piha Exelon John Hilditch Exelon Jim Annett Exelon Paul Cervenka Exelon Phil O'Donnell Exelon Dylan Cimock Exelon Casey Muggleston Exelon Don Brindle Exelon RalphWolen Exelon ENCLOSURE 1 |
|
| |
|
| ==SUMMARY==
| | DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION April 9, 2014 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the applicant), held a telephone conference call on April9, 2014, to discuss and clarify the following draft request for additional information (DRAI), |
| OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 9, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SET 23, PERTAINING TO THE BYRON STATION AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAG NOS. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, AND MF1882) The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the applicant), held a telephone conference call on April 9, 2014, to discuss and clarify the staff's draft request for additional information (ORAl), Set 23, concerning the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application.
| | Set 23, concerning the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA). |
| The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staff's ORAls. Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants, and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the ORAls discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. IRA Richard Plasse for! Lindsay Robinson, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-454, 50-455, 50-456, and 50-457
| | ORAl 3.5.2.2.2.2-1 Applicability: |
| | Byron and Braidwood Background; SRP-LR Section 3.5.2.2.2.2, "Reduction of Strength and Modulus due to Elevated Temperature," recommends further evaluation tor any concrete elements of safety-related structures and other concrete structures that exceed temperature limits of 66°C (150°F) for general areas and 93°C (200°F) for local areas. The SRP*LR also states that higher temperatures may be allowed if tests or calculations are provided to evaluate the reduction in strength and modulus of elasticity and these reductions are applied to the design calculations. |
| | LRA Section 3.5.2.2.2.2 states, in part, that: |
| | High energy line penetrations have been designed to limit surrounding concrete surtaces to temperatures less than 200"F, except for the special pipe whip restraints that are located around each feedwater and main steam pipe as it passes through the concrete wall separating the main steam isolation valve room from the main steam tunnel. The design documents for the concrete at these pipe whip restraints include an evaluation for elevated temperatures, which determined that the concrete temperature up to 300"F at the local areas of the pipes was acceptable. |
| | LRA Table 3.5*1, item 3.5.1*48, which references LRA section 3.5.2.2.2.2, states that the aging effect and mechanism of reduction of concrete strength and modulus due to elevated temperature is not applicable to Byron and Braidwood. It further states that the main steam (MS) tunnel and main steam isolation valve (MSIV) room walls have been evaluated and found acceptable tor temperatures up to 300"F. It is not clear if the elevated temperatures experienced by the concrete walls of the MS tunnel and the MSIV room near the special pipe whip restraints remain below the 300°F used in the evaluation and why the AMR line item would not be applicable to these MSIV room and MS tunnel concrete walls. The staff reviewed the Byron and Braidwood updated final safety analyses report (UFSAR), specifically Section 3.8.4, and did not find any discussion of an engineering evaluation that accounted for possible reductions in concrete strength or modulus of elasticity due to elevated temperatures. |
| | ENCLOSURE 2 |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosures:==
| | Request: |
| : 1. List of Participants
| | : 1. Provide the maximum temperature that is experienced by the concrete walls of the MSIV room and MS tunnel near the special feedwater and main steam pipe whip restraints. |
| : 2. List of Draft Request for Additional Information cc w/encls: Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
| | : 2. Provide a discussion of the engineering evaluation that was conducted to demonstrate the concrete would be able to periarm its intended functions while being exposed to elevated temperatures above the GALL Report recommended limits. Include any reductions in strength or modulus of elasticity that were applied to the design calculations or any test results used in the evaluation. |
| See next page ADAMS Accession No* ML14107A077
| |
| *concurred via email OFFICE LA:DLR PM: RPB1 :DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB1 :DLR NAME I King LRobinson I ;DiazSanabria LRobinson JUribe for) J fRPiasse for) DATE 4/22/14 4/24/14 4/25/14 4/25/14 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION PARTICIPANTS Lindsay Robinson John Wise George Thomas Gautam Banerjee Chris Wilson Don Wartel AI Fulvia Albert Piha John Hilditch Jim Annett Paul Cervenka Phil O'Donnell Dylan Cimock Casey Muggleston Don Brindle RalphWolen LIST OF PARTICIPANTS April 9, 2014 AFFILIATIONS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) NRC NRC NRC Exelon Generating Company, LLC (Exelon) Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon Exelon ENCLOSURE 1
| |
| DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION April 9, 2014 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the applicant), held a telephone conference call on April9, 2014, to discuss and clarify the following draft request for additional information (DRAI), Set 23, concerning the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA). ORAl 3.5.2.2.2.2-1 Applicability:
| |
| Byron and Braidwood Background; SRP-LR Section 3.5.2.2.2.2, "Reduction of Strength and Modulus due to Elevated Temperature," recommends further evaluation tor any concrete elements of safety-related structures and other concrete structures that exceed temperature limits of 66°C (150°F) for general areas and 93°C (200°F) for local areas. The SRP*LR also states that higher temperatures may be allowed if tests or calculations are provided to evaluate the reduction in strength and modulus of elasticity and these reductions are applied to the design calculations.
| |
| LRA Section 3.5.2.2.2.2 states, in part, that: High energy line penetrations have been designed to limit surrounding concrete surtaces to temperatures less than 200"F, except for the special pipe whip restraints that are located around each feedwater and main steam pipe as it passes through the concrete wall separating the main steam isolation valve room from the main steam tunnel. The design documents for the concrete at these pipe whip restraints include an evaluation for elevated temperatures, which determined that the concrete temperature up to 300"F at the local areas of the pipes was acceptable.
| |
| LRA Table 3.5*1, item 3.5.1*48, which references LRA section 3.5.2.2.2.2, states that the aging effect and mechanism of reduction of concrete strength and modulus due to elevated temperature is not applicable to Byron and Braidwood.
| |
| It further states that the main steam (MS) tunnel and main steam isolation valve (MSIV) room walls have been evaluated and found acceptable tor temperatures up to 300"F. It is not clear if the elevated temperatures experienced by the concrete walls of the MS tunnel and the MSIV room near the special pipe whip restraints remain below the 300°F used in the evaluation and why the AMR line item would not be applicable to these MSIV room and MS tunnel concrete walls. The staff reviewed the Byron and Braidwood updated final safety analyses report (UFSAR), specifically Section 3.8.4, and did not find any discussion of an engineering evaluation that accounted for possible reductions in concrete strength or modulus of elasticity due to elevated temperatures.
| |
| ENCLOSURE 2 Request: 1. Provide the maximum temperature that is experienced by the concrete walls of the MSIV room and MS tunnel near the special feedwater and main steam pipe whip restraints.
| |
| : 2. Provide a discussion of the engineering evaluation that was conducted to demonstrate the concrete would be able to peri arm its intended functions while being exposed to elevated temperatures above the GALL Report recommended limits. Include any reductions in strength or modulus of elasticity that were applied to the design calculations or any test results used in the evaluation. | |
| : 3. Justify why AMR line item 3.5.1-48 is not applicable to the MSIV room and MS tunnel concrete walls that experience elevated temperatures above 200°F and the required evaluation. | | : 3. Justify why AMR line item 3.5.1-48 is not applicable to the MSIV room and MS tunnel concrete walls that experience elevated temperatures above 200°F and the required evaluation. |
| Discussion: | | Discussion: The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. The applicant requested that requests 2 and 3 be made conditional based on the response to request 1. The staff agreed to make the change and will preface requests 2 and 3 with the following conditional statement, "If the maximum temperature experienced is greater than 200°F." This question will be sent as part of the formal request titled: "RAI 3.5.2.2.2.2-1." |
| The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. The applicant requested that requests 2 and 3 be made conditional based on the response to request 1. The staff agreed to make the change and will preface requests 2 and 3 with the following conditional statement, "If the maximum temperature experienced is greater than 200°F." This question will be sent as part of the formal request titled: "RAI 3.5.2.2.2.2-1." ORAl 3.5.2-6 Applicability: | | ORAl 3.5.2-6 Applicability: |
| Byron and Braidwood | | Byron and Braidwood |
|
| |
|
| ==Background:== | | ==Background:== |
|
| |
|
| Item 241ocated in SRP-LR Table 3.5-treferences the GALL Report item II.At.CP-100. | | Item 241ocated in SRP-LR Table 3.5-treferences the GALL Report item II.At.CP-100. The AMP recommended for item II.A1.CP-100 in the GALL Report is XI.S2, "ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL," or XI.S6, "Structures Monitoring." |
| The AMP recommended for item II.A1.CP-100 in the GALL Report is XI.S2, "ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL," or XI.S6, "Structures Monitoring." The GALL Report AMP XI.S2, "ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL," Program Description states that 10 CFR 50.55a imposes the examination requirements of ASME Code, Section XI, Subsection IWL, for Class CC reinforced and prestressed concrete containments. | | The GALL Report AMP XI.S2, "ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL," Program Description states that 10 CFR 50.55a imposes the examination requirements of ASME Code, Section XI, Subsection IWL, for Class CC reinforced and prestressed concrete containments. The GALL Report AMP "Scope of Program" (Program Element 1) states that the components within the scope of Subsection IWL are reinforced concrete and unbonded post-tensioning systems of Class CC containments. Subsection IWL exempts from examination portions of the concrete containment that are inaccessible such as concrete covered by liner, foundation material, or backfill or obstructed by adjacent structures or other components. However, 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii) specifies additional requirements for inaccessible areas that requires the licensee to evaluate the acceptability of concrete in inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas. |
| The GALL Report AMP "Scope of Program" (Program Element 1) states that the components within the scope of Subsection IWL are reinforced concrete and unbonded post-tensioning systems of Class CC containments. | | Issue: |
| Subsection IWL exempts from examination portions of the concrete containment that are inaccessible such as concrete covered by liner, foundation material, or backfill or obstructed by adjacent structures or other components. | | The corresponding LRA Table 3.5.1, Item 3.5.1-24, states in the "Discussion" column that this item is consistent with the GALL Report and cites the Structures Monitoring (LRA Section 8.2.1.34) program as the AMP for managing this aging effect and mechanism tor inaccessible |
| However, 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii) specifies additional requirements for inaccessible areas that requires the licensee to evaluate the acceptability of concrete in inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas. Issue: The corresponding LRA Table 3.5.1, Item 3.5.1-24, states in the "Discussion" column that this item is consistent with the GALL Report and cites the Structures Monitoring (LRA Section 8.2.1.34) program as the AMP for managing this aging effect and mechanism tor inaccessible areas of containment concrete exposed to groundwater and soil environments, including groundwater chemistry. | | |
| In the context of the LRA, the description for Item II.A1.CP-100 in the GALL Report does include containment pressure-resisting boundary concrete components in inaccessible areas above grade in an "Air-Outdoor'' | | areas of containment concrete exposed to groundwater and soil environments, including groundwater chemistry. In the context of the LRA, the description for Item II.A1.CP-100 in the GALL Report does include containment pressure-resisting boundary concrete components in inaccessible areas above grade in an "Air- Outdoor'' environment as well as below-grade areas in a "Groundwater/Soil" environment. The applicant has not addressed inaccessible components in the "Air- Outdoor" environment for this AMR line item. Further, the ASME Sect1on XI, Subsection IWL program, mandated by the GALL Report and 10 CFR 50.55a for concrete containment pressure-resisting boundary components in both accessible and inaccessible areas, is not included as an applicable AMP for AMR line item 3.5.1*24 and the corresponding line items in LRA Table 3.5.2-4. |
| environment as well as below-grade areas in a "Groundwater/Soil" environment. | | Request: |
| The applicant has not addressed inaccessible components in the "Air-Outdoor" environment for this AMR line item. Further, the ASME Sect1on XI, Subsection IWL program, mandated by the GALL Report and 10 CFR 50.55a for concrete containment pressure-resisting boundary components in both accessible and inaccessible areas, is not included as an applicable AMP for AMR line item 3.5.1*24 and the corresponding line items in LRA Table 3.5.2-4. Request: With regard to AMR line item 3.5.1-24 in LRA Table 3.5-1 that corresponds to Hem II. A 1.CP-1 00 in the GALL Report, provide the technical basis to justify why the ASME Code, Section XI, Subsection IWL program, recommended by the GALL Report and required by 10 CFR 50.55a for concrete containment pressure-resisting boundary components in both accessible and inaccessible areas, is not included as an applicable AMP for the line item and corresponding line items in LRA Table 3.5.2-4. Update the LRA, as necessary, based on the response to this request. Discussion: | | With regard to AMR line item 3.5.1-24 in LRA Table 3.5-1 that corresponds to Hem II. A 1.CP-1 00 in the GALL Report, provide the technical basis to justify why the ASME Code, Section XI, Subsection IWL program, recommended by the GALL Report and required by 10 CFR 50.55a for concrete containment pressure-resisting boundary components in both accessible and inaccessible areas, is not included as an applicable AMP for the line item and corresponding line items in LRA Table 3.5.2-4. Update the LRA, as necessary, based on the response to this request. |
| The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. No edits were proposed. | | Discussion: The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. No edits were proposed. |
| The applicant mentioned that this question is closely related to another question listed in Set 24 and asked that it be removed from Set 23 and added to Set 24. The staff agreed to remove this question from Set 23 and add it to Set 24. ORAl 8.2.1.12-1a Applicability: | | The applicant mentioned that this question is closely related to another question listed in Set 24 and asked that it be removed from Set 23 and added to Set 24. The staff agreed to remove this question from Set 23 and add it to Set 24. |
| Byron and Braidwood | | ORAl 8.2.1.12-1a Applicability: |
| | Byron and Braidwood |
|
| |
|
| ==Background:== | | ==Background:== |
|
| |
|
| The response to RAI B.2.1.12-1, dated February 27, 2014, stated that existing station procedures require a general visual inspection of internal surfaces of components within the scope of the Closed Treated Water Systems program when the systems are opened. In addition, the personnel performing the inspections are qualified to Exelon job qualifications and in accordance with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training program. The staff notes that, similar to the Closed Treated Water Systems program, the Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Components program uses opportunistic visual inspections to monitor aging effects of component internal surfaces. | | The response to RAI B.2.1.12-1, dated February 27, 2014, stated that existing station procedures require a general visual inspection of internal surfaces of components within the scope of the Closed Treated Water Systems program when the systems are opened. In addition, the personnel performing the inspections are qualified to Exelon job qualifications and in accordance with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training program. |
| However, during its AMP audit, the staff noted that the Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Components program does not rely on the use of existing station procedures to identify age-related degradation. | | The staff notes that, similar to the Closed Treated Water Systems program, the Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Components program uses opportunistic visual inspections to monitor aging effects of component internal surfaces. However, during its AMP audit, the staff noted that the Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Components program does not rely on the use of existing station procedures to identify age-related degradation. Rather, a new procedure was proposed to inspect for evidence of loss of material, leakage, cracking, and reduction of heat transfer when the internal surfaces of metallic components were made accessible. |
| Rather, a new procedure was proposed to inspect for evidence of loss of material, leakage, cracking, and reduction of heat transfer when the internal surfaces of metallic components were made accessible. Issue: It is unclear to the staff how the existing station opportunistic inspections will be capable of detecting the specific applicable aging effects of components internal surtaces in the Closed Treated Water Systems program. The RAI response did not provide sufficient information regarding: | | |
| : 1. The details within the IN PO training program and Exelon job qualifications that demonstrate that personnel periorming the opportunistic inspections are qualified to identify the applicable aging effects, and 2. The details within the existing station procedures that demonstrate that, when piping internal surlaces are made accessible, personnel will be inspecting for parameters that are capable of detecting the presence and extent of aging effects. Request: 1. State the details within the INPO training program and Exelon job qualifications that demonstrate that personnel pertorming the opportunistic inspections are qualified to identify loss of material due to general, pitting, crevice, and galvanic corrosion; and cracking due to stress corrosion cracking. | | Issue: |
| | It is unclear to the staff how the existing station opportunistic inspections will be capable of detecting the specific applicable aging effects of components internal surtaces in the Closed Treated Water Systems program. The RAI response did not provide sufficient information regarding: |
| | : 1. The details within the IN PO training program and Exelon job qualifications that demonstrate that personnel periorming the opportunistic inspections are qualified to identify the applicable aging effects, and |
| | : 2. The details within the existing station procedures that demonstrate that, when piping internal surlaces are made accessible, personnel will be inspecting for parameters that are capable of detecting the presence and extent of aging effects. |
| | Request: |
| | : 1. State the details within the INPO training program and Exelon job qualifications that demonstrate that personnel pertorming the opportunistic inspections are qualified to identify loss of material due to general, pitting, crevice, and galvanic corrosion; and cracking due to stress corrosion cracking. |
| : 2. State the process-based (in lieu of knowledge-based) controls that exist in station procedures that will ensure that, when component internal suriaces are made accessible, personnel will be inspecting for parameters that are capable of detecting the presence and extent of loss of material due to general, pitting, crevice, and galvanic corrosion; and cracking due to stress corrosion cracking (e.g., prejob brief details, checklists within the work order). Alternatively, propose a new procedure that specifically addresses these controls. | | : 2. State the process-based (in lieu of knowledge-based) controls that exist in station procedures that will ensure that, when component internal suriaces are made accessible, personnel will be inspecting for parameters that are capable of detecting the presence and extent of loss of material due to general, pitting, crevice, and galvanic corrosion; and cracking due to stress corrosion cracking (e.g., prejob brief details, checklists within the work order). Alternatively, propose a new procedure that specifically addresses these controls. |
| Discussion: | | Discussion: The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. The applicant requested that the second question either be merged with the first question or be made conditional on the first question. The staff will have to conduct additional review to evaluate the applicant's request. Therefore, this question will be removed from Set 23 and added to Set 24. |
| The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. The applicant requested that the second question either be merged with the first question or be made conditional on the first question. | |
| The staff will have to conduct additional review to evaluate the applicant's request. Therefore, this question will be removed from Set 23 and added to Set 24. | |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
|
| |
|
| ==SUMMARY== | | ==SUMMARY== |
| OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 9, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SET 23, PERTAINING TO THE BYRON STATION AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAG NOS. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, AND MF1882) DISTRIBUTION EMAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDir Resource RidsNrrD1rRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDirRarb Resource RidsNrrDirRasb Resource RidsOgcMaiiCenter RidsNrrPMByron Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource LRobinson DMcln1yre, OPA EDuncan, Rill JBenjamin, Alii AGarmoe, Rill JMcGhee, Rill JRobbins, Rill VMitlyng, Rill PChandrathil, Rill}} | | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 9, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SET 23, PERTAINING TO THE BYRON STATION AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAG NOS. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, AND MF1882) |
| | DISTRIBUTION EMAIL: |
| | PUBLIC RidsNrrDir Resource RidsNrrD1rRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDirRarb Resource RidsNrrDirRasb Resource RidsOgcMaiiCenter RidsNrrPMByron Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource LRobinson DMcln1yre, OPA EDuncan, Rill JBenjamin, Alii AGarmoe, Rill JMcGhee, Rill JRobbins, Rill VMitlyng, Rill PChandrathil, Rill}} |
Letter Sequence Draft RAI |
---|
|
Results
Other: ML13212A367, ML14050A304, ML14071A620, ML14072A369, ML14092A346, ML14177A430, ML14238A691, ML15098A181, ML15106A736, RS-14-183, Updated Responses to NRC Set 14 Requests for Additional Information, Related License Renewal Application, RS-14-249, Results of Detailed Review Performed in Response to Request 1 of NRC RAI B.2.1.7-7 from Set 17, Related to License Renewal Application
|
MONTHYEARML13212A3672013-08-12012 August 2013 Plan for the Aging Management Program Regulatory Audits Regarding the Byron and Braidwood Nuclear Stations License Renewal Application Review (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: Other ML13281A5742013-11-25025 November 2013 Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application - Aging Management, Set 3 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882 Project stage: RAI ML13303B4632013-11-25025 November 2013 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on October 22, 2013, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Concerning RAI Set 3 for the Byron-Braidwood LRA Project stage: RAI ML13281A5692013-12-12012 December 2013 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2, LRA - Aging Management, Set 4 Project stage: RAI ML13282A3692013-12-13013 December 2013 Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application - Aging Management, Set 2 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882 Project stage: RAI RS-13-273, Responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 3, Dated November 25, 2013, Related to the License Renewal Application2013-12-17017 December 2013 Responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 3, Dated November 25, 2013, Related to the License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI RS-13-274, Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 5, Dated November 22, 2013, Related to License Renewal Application2013-12-19019 December 2013 Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 5, Dated November 22, 2013, Related to License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI ML13317A0752014-01-13013 January 2014 Requests for Additional Information for Review of Byron, Units 1 & 2, and Braidwood, Units 1 & 2, License Renewal Applications, Set 6 Project stage: RAI RS-14-003, Bryon, Units 1 and 2, Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 2, Dated December 13, 2013, Related to the License Renewal Application2014-01-13013 January 2014 Bryon, Units 1 and 2, Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 2, Dated December 13, 2013, Related to the License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI ML14007A6582014-01-22022 January 2014 Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 9 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML13309A9322014-01-23023 January 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on October 31, 2013, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Concerning Draft Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Byron Station and Braid Project stage: Draft RAI RS-14-030, Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 6, Dated January 13, 2014, Related to License Renewal Application2014-02-0404 February 2014 Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 6, Dated January 13, 2014, Related to License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI ML14006A0212014-02-0606 February 2014 Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application- Aging Management, Set 8 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14023A5642014-02-0707 February 2014 RAI for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 13 (TAC MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14030A5962014-02-10010 February 2014 Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 12 (TAC MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14007A6032014-02-18018 February 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, LRA - Aging Management - Set 17 Project stage: RAI ML14035A1892014-02-20020 February 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on January 30, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Byron Station and Braidw Project stage: Draft RAI ML14035A5342014-02-20020 February 2014 January 22, 2014, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Exelon Generation Company, Llc., Concerning Draft Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Byron Station and Braidwood Station, License Renewal Applica Project stage: Draft RAI RS-14-051, Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 8, Dated February 6, 2014 Related to the License Renewal Application2014-02-27027 February 2014 Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 8, Dated February 6, 2014 Related to the License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI ML14063A4952014-03-0404 March 2014 Units 1 & 2, Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 13, Dated February 7, 2014 Re License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI ML14050A1672014-03-0404 March 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call on January 23, 2014, Between U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Concerning RAI Set 11, for Byron-Braidwood License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881 Project stage: RAI ML14036A3102014-03-0404 March 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on January 28, 2014, Between NRC and Exelon, Concerning RAI Set 10, for the Byron and Braidwood Station, LRA Project stage: RAI ML14051A4312014-03-0404 March 2014 Summary of Telephone Conferene Call Held on January 29, 2014, Between the NRC and Exelon Generating Company, Llc., Concerning RAI Set 10, for the Byron and Braidwood Station License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and Project stage: RAI ML14051A4282014-03-0606 March 2014 January 13, 2014, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between the NRC and Exelon RAI Set 8, for the Byron and Braidwood Station LRA Project stage: RAI ML14050A0812014-03-0707 March 2014 Correction to Request for Additional Information B.2.1.10-1, Letter Dated February 7, 2014, for the Review of the Byron Station and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, LRA Set 13 Project stage: RAI ML14058B1802014-03-11011 March 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call on February 18, 2014, Between U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission & Exelon Generation Company, LLC Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information Regarding Byron & Braidwood Stations, License Renewal Project stage: Draft RAI ML14064A4032014-03-11011 March 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call on February 27, 2014, Between U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission & Exelon Generation Company, LLC Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information Re Byron Station & Braidwood Station License Renewal Project stage: Draft RAI ML14064A3912014-03-11011 March 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 15 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14071A6202014-03-13013 March 2014 Aging Management Programs Audit Report Regarding the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 (Tac Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: Other ML14072A3692014-03-13013 March 2014 AMP Audit Enclosure (3) Project stage: Other ML14050A3042014-03-14014 March 2014 Scoping and Screening Methodology Audit Report Regarding the Byron Station, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, LRA Project stage: Other ML14058B1822014-03-18018 March 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 14 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14051A5032014-03-20020 March 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application - Set 17 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI RS-14-084, Responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 10, Dated February 26, 2014 Related to the License Renewal Application2014-03-28028 March 2014 Responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Set 10, Dated February 26, 2014 Related to the License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI ML14084A3352014-04-0303 April 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 16 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14073A7052014-04-0303 April 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on February 12, 2014, Between the NRC and Exelon, Concerning Drais Pertaining to the Byron and Braidwood Station, LRA Project stage: RAI ML14092A3462014-04-0707 April 2014 Project Manager Change for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: Other ML14092A2612014-04-0707 April 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 20 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14084A4882014-04-0707 April 2014 03/04/2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Byron and Braidwood License Renewal Application Set 16 Project stage: Draft RAI ML14094A3662014-04-0808 April 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 19 Project stage: RAI ML14093B2472014-04-10010 April 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 18 (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14099A4852014-04-17017 April 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 & 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 & 2, License Renewal Application, Set 21, (TAC Nos. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, and MF1882) Project stage: RAI ML14099A4932014-04-22022 April 2014 April 03, 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information, Set 21, Pertaining to Byron, Units 1 & 2, Braidwood, Units 1 & 2, License Renewal Appl Project stage: Draft RAI ML14111A1182014-04-24024 April 2014 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, Set 22 Project stage: RAI ML14107A0772014-04-25025 April 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on April 9, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission & Exelon Generation Company, LLC Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information, Set 23, Pertaining to the Byron Station & Braid Project stage: Draft RAI ML14107A2262014-05-14014 May 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on March 26, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information, Set 21, Pertaining to the Byron Station and Project stage: Draft RAI ML14092A4402014-05-14014 May 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on March 19, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information, Set 18, Pertaining to the Byron Station and Project stage: Draft RAI ML14112A4182014-05-14014 May 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on April 10, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information, Set 22, Pertaining to the Byron Station and Project stage: Draft RAI ML14094A4252014-05-14014 May 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on April 1, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information, Set 19, Pertaining to the Byron Station and B Project stage: Draft RAI ML14129A3392014-05-14014 May 2014 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance 2014-03-11
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARIR 05000456/20230042024-02-0202 February 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000456/2023004 and 05000457/2023004 IR 05000454/20230042024-02-0202 February 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000454/2023004 and 05000455/2023004 ML24025C7242024-01-29029 January 2024 Notification of NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information; Inspection Report 05000456/2024002; 05000457/2024002 IR 05000457/20230112024-01-25025 January 2024 2B Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Diesel Fuel Oil Dilution Report 05000457/2023011 and Preliminary Greater than Green Finding and Apparent Violation ML24022A2722024-01-23023 January 2024 Request for Information for an NRC Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal Inspection Report 05000454/2024011 ML24018A0362024-01-17017 January 2024 Paragon Energy Solutions, Defect with Detroit Diesel/Mtu Fuel Injectors P/N R5229660 Cat Id 0001390618 RS-24-004, Proposed Alternative to the Distribution Requirements of ASME Code Table IWC-2411-1 for the Steam Generators2024-01-11011 January 2024 Proposed Alternative to the Distribution Requirements of ASME Code Table IWC-2411-1 for the Steam Generators ML23348A2162023-12-15015 December 2023 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L-2023-LLE-0030 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) IR 05000456/20200232023-12-15015 December 2023 Baseline Security Inspection Document; 05000456/2023/402; 05000457/2023/402 ML23320A1762023-12-13013 December 2023 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L-2023-LLE-0027 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) ML23277A0032023-12-11011 December 2023 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Adoption of TSTF-370 ML23339A0452023-12-0505 December 2023 Request for Information for an NRC Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal Inspection Report 05000546/2024010 ML23313A1552023-12-0101 December 2023 Review of the Fall 2022 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML23318A5102023-12-0101 December 2023 Relief from the Requirements of the ASME Code IR 05000454/20233012023-11-27027 November 2023 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000454/2023301 and 05000455/2023301 ML23331A8922023-11-22022 November 2023 Supplement - Braidwood Security Rule Exemption Request ISFSI Docket No. Reference 05000457/LER-2023-001, Submittal of LER 2023-001-00 for Braidwood Station, Unit 2, Train B Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Was Inoperable Due to Degraded Oil in the Crank Case2023-11-17017 November 2023 Submittal of LER 2023-001-00 for Braidwood Station, Unit 2, Train B Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Was Inoperable Due to Degraded Oil in the Crank Case ML23321A0442023-11-17017 November 2023 Notification of Deviation from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Topical Report MRP-227, Revision 1-A, Materials Reliability Program: Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guideline BYRON 2023-0065, Unit 2 - Notification of Deviation from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Topical Report MRP-227, Revision 1-A, Materials Reliability Program: Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guideline2023-11-17017 November 2023 Unit 2 - Notification of Deviation from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Topical Report MRP-227, Revision 1-A, Materials Reliability Program: Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guideline BYRON 2023-0063, Day Inservice Inspection Report for Interval 4, Period 3, (B2R24)2023-11-16016 November 2023 Day Inservice Inspection Report for Interval 4, Period 3, (B2R24) IR 05000454/20230032023-11-13013 November 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000454/2023003 and 05000455/2023003 and Exercise of Enforcement Discretion RS-23-117, Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information2023-11-10010 November 2023 Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information ML23317A1192023-11-10010 November 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - 2023 Annual Report - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums RS-23-118, Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information2023-11-10010 November 2023 Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information ML23313A0852023-11-0909 November 2023 Submittal of 2023-301 Byron Initial License Examination Post-Examination Comments RS-23-114, Proposed Alternative for Examination of Pressurizer Circumferential and Longitudinal Shell-to-Head Welds and Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds2023-11-0101 November 2023 Proposed Alternative for Examination of Pressurizer Circumferential and Longitudinal Shell-to-Head Welds and Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds ML23297A2352023-10-26026 October 2023 Information Request for the Cyber Security Baseline Inspection, Notification to Perform Inspection IR 05000456/20234012023-10-18018 October 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000456/2023401 and 05000457/2023401 IR 05000456/20230102023-10-18018 October 2023 Functional Engineering Inspection Commercial Grade Dedication Report 05000456/2023010 and 05000457/2023010 RS-23-100, Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-10-13013 October 2023 Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation RS-23-097, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans2023-10-12012 October 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans RS-23-108, Proposed Alternative for Examinations of Examination Categories B-B, B-D, and C-A Steam Generator Pressure Retaining Welds and Full Penetration Welded Nozzles2023-10-11011 October 2023 Proposed Alternative for Examinations of Examination Categories B-B, B-D, and C-A Steam Generator Pressure Retaining Welds and Full Penetration Welded Nozzles RS-23-105, Proposed Alternative for Examinations of Examination Category C-B Steam Generator Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Inside Radius Sections2023-10-10010 October 2023 Proposed Alternative for Examinations of Examination Category C-B Steam Generator Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Inside Radius Sections ML23278A0272023-10-0505 October 2023 Operator Licensing Examination Approval - Byron Station, October 2023 RS-23-094, Relief Request I4R-24, Alternative for Post-Peening Reexamination Frequency for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Nozzle Number 752023-09-29029 September 2023 Relief Request I4R-24, Alternative for Post-Peening Reexamination Frequency for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Nozzle Number 75 RS-23-093, License Amendment to Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications 3.7.15, Spent Fuel Pool Boron Concentration, 3.7.16, Spent Fuel.2023-09-29029 September 2023 License Amendment to Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications 3.7.15, Spent Fuel Pool Boron Concentration, 3.7.16, Spent Fuel. ML23251A1622023-09-29029 September 2023 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Reports to Reflect TSTF-577 Reporting Requirements RS-23-091, Relief Request I4R-25, Alternative Requirements for Reactor Pressure Vessel Inservice Inspection Intervals2023-09-26026 September 2023 Relief Request I4R-25, Alternative Requirements for Reactor Pressure Vessel Inservice Inspection Intervals ML23226A0062023-09-19019 September 2023 Review of License Renewal Commitment Number 10 Submittal ML23180A1692023-09-11011 September 2023 Calvert Cliff Units 1 & 2, and R.E. Ginna Plant - Withdrawal of Proposed Alternatives to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Requirements (Epids L-2022-LRR-0074, 0076, 0079, 0091, 0092, 0093 and 0094) ML23242A3282023-09-0101 September 2023 Amendment No. 233 Correction IR 05000454/20235012023-08-31031 August 2023 Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000454/2023501 and 05000455/2023501 IR 05000454/20230052023-08-30030 August 2023 Updated Inspection Plan for Byron Station (Report 05000454/2023005 and 05000455/2023005) IR 05000456/20230052023-08-30030 August 2023 Updated Inspection Plan for Braidwood Station Report 05000456/2023005 and 05000457/2023005 ML23234A2462023-08-25025 August 2023 Confirmation of Initial License Examination IR 05000456/20230022023-08-0303 August 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000456/2023002 and 05000457/2023002 IR 05000454/20230022023-08-0303 August 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000454/2023002 and 05000455/2023002 2024-02-02
[Table view] Category:Meeting Summary
MONTHYEARML24009A0552024-01-24024 January 2024 Summary of January 8, 2024, Presubmittal Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Removal of the Power Distribution Monitoring System from Technical Specifications ML24018A1772024-01-19019 January 2024 Summary of August 30, 2023, Presubmittal Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Relaxation of Inspection Requirements for the Head Penetration P-75 Flaw ML23363A0942024-01-0303 January 2024 Summary of October 4, 2023, Pre Submittal Meeting Between the U.S. NRC and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Revising Technical Specification 3.7.9. Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) ML23362A0042024-01-0202 January 2024 Documentation of Cancelled September 1, 2023, Presubmittal Meeting Between the NRC and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding 6-Month Extension of Certain Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Inspections ML23352A3822023-12-19019 December 2023 Summary of December 11, 2023, Presubmittal Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Deletion of Technical Specification 5.6.5.b.5 ML23320A2472023-11-17017 November 2023 Constellation - Summary of November 14, 2023, Public Pre-Application Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC on Adoption of TSTF-591 ML23263B1062023-09-22022 September 2023 R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant - Constellation - Pre-Application Amse 9/18/2023 Meeting Summary ML23164A2112023-06-14014 June 2023 Summary of the June 1, 2023, Public Outreach to Discuss the NRC 2022 End-of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 ML23129A0202023-05-30030 May 2023 Summary of March 22, 2023, Closed Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, to Discuss a Future License Amendment Request That Allows Byron Station and Braidwood Station to Utilize a New Citicality Analysis for the Spent Fuel Pools ML23055A0352023-03-24024 March 2023 Summary of February 23, 2023, with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC on Proposed Changes to Emergency Plans to Revise Emergency Action Levels ML23033A6662023-02-0909 February 2023 Summary of Public Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC (Constellation) to Discuss Its Request for Alternatives for Certain Steam Generator Weld Inspections for Calvert Cliffs 1 & 2, Byron 1 & 2, Braidwood 1 & 2, and Ginna ML22264A1992022-11-14014 November 2022 Summary of August 22, 2022, Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Performance Monitoring of Steam Generator Welds (Epids L-2022-LRR-0074, 0076, 0079, 0091, 0092, 0093 and ML22305A5992022-11-10010 November 2022 Summary of Closed Presubmittal Meeting Between the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Transition to Framatome Fuel ML22159A2232022-06-0909 June 2022 Summary of the June 2, 2022, Public Outreach to Discuss the NRC 2021 End of Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 ML22115A2122022-05-12012 May 2022 Summary of April 11, 2022, Meeting Between the U.S. NRC and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding a Future Amendment to Place One High Burnup Lead Test Assembly Into the Byron, Unit 2, Reactor ML22111A2852022-05-0909 May 2022 Summary of April 4, 2022, Meeting Between the U.S. NRC and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Performance Monitoring of Pressurizer Welds (EPIDs L-2022-LLR-0035/36) ML22111A3362022-05-0909 May 2022 Summary of April 7, 2022, Meeting Between the NRC and Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Regarding Performance Monitoring of Pressurizer Welds (Epids L-2022-LRR-0035 and 0036) ML21330A0722021-12-0303 December 2021 Summary of November 17, 2021, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Related to a Future License Amendment to Remove License Condition 2.C.(12)(d) for Braidwood Station, Unit 2 ML21333A1532021-11-30030 November 2021 Summary of November 16, 2021, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request for an Alternative to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval ML21237A0412021-08-30030 August 2021 Summary of the July 27, 2021, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request to Use Case OMN-28, ML21176A0822021-07-0606 July 2021 June 15, 2021, Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Vessel Nozzle Repair Related to a Planned Request for an Alternative Related to Reactor Pressure ML21139A1852021-06-22022 June 2021 Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Its Requested Alternative to Eliminate Certain Documentation Requirements for the Replacement of Pressure Retaining Bolting ML21167A2152021-06-16016 June 2021 June 8, 2021, Summary of the Public Outreach to Discuss the NRC 2020 End-Of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 ML21147A4262021-06-0303 June 2021 Summary of May 12, 2021, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, Llc, Related to a Planned License Amendment to Modify the Ultimate Heat Sink Technical Specifications ML21033A6582021-02-0404 February 2021 Summary of October 13, 2020, Presubmittal Meeting Between the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Post Shutdown Emergency Plan Staffing to Support the Planned Early Closures ML21011A2822021-01-21021 January 2021 Summary of January 6, 2021, Presubmittal Meeting Between the NRC and Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Licensing Activities to Support the Planned Early Closures of Byron, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 and Dresden, Units 2 and 3 ML20351A2832020-12-18018 December 2020 Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request for an Exemption to Reduce the Frequency of Updates to Its Inservice Testing and Inspection Programs ML20342A3522020-12-10010 December 2020 Summary of November 13, 2020, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request for an Alterantive to Certain Documentation Requirements for the Replacement of Pressure Retaining Bolting (EPID-L-2020-LRM-0102) ML20323A0332020-12-0101 December 2020 Summary of November 4, 2020, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request for an Alternative to Reduce the Frequency of Updates to Its Inservice Testing and Inspection Programs ML20280A2482020-10-0707 October 2020 Summary of September 22, 2020, Presubmittal Meeting Between the NRC and Exelon Generation Company LLC Regarding Licensing Activities to Support the Planned Early Closures of Byron, Units 1 and 2 and Dresden, Units 2 and 3 ML20171A3812020-08-12012 August 2020 (COVID-19) Presubmittal Meeting Summary - Byron Unit 2 LAR - One-Time Extension of Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML20218A5302020-08-0505 August 2020 July 14, 2020, Summary of the Public Webinar to Discuss the NRC 2019 End-of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 ML20181A0002020-06-29029 June 2020 Summary of 6/24/20 Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Planned Request for Alternative to Supplemental Valve Position Indication Testing Requirements for Braidwood, Calvert Cliffs, Clinton, Limerick, Nine Mile, Peach Botto ML19326A3152019-12-0303 December 2019 Summary of November 18, 2019, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request for an Alternative to Supplemental Valve Position Indication Testing Requirements ML19326C3582019-12-0303 December 2019 Summary of November 20, 2019, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request to Revise the Quality Assurance Program ML19162A0272019-06-21021 June 2019 Summary of June 4, 2019, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request to Extend the Test Interval for Safety Relief Valves ML20108F0902019-04-20020 April 2019 April 15, 2020, Meeting Summary with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Planned Request to Defer Submittal of Owner'S Activity Report (Braidwood 2,Byron 2,Calvert Cliffs 1, LaSalle 1, Limerick 1, Nine Mile Point 2, Quad 2, R. E. Ginna ML19036A8832019-02-0707 February 2019 Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding a Planned Request to Use ASME Code Case N-879 ML18354B1712019-01-0202 January 2019 Summary of December 19, 2018, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding the Use of Boiling Water Reactor Vessel and Internals Project Guidelines ML18325A1712018-11-28028 November 2018 Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Planned Fleet License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications for High Radiation Areas ML18297A1722018-10-26026 October 2018 Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Planned License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-427 ML18225A3042018-08-16016 August 2018 Summary of August 8, 2018, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC, on a Future Relief Request to Extend the Post Peening Follow-Up Inspections for Certain Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations ML18135A0222018-05-14014 May 2018 Summary of the May 10th, 2018, Public Open House Regarding Braidwood Nuclear Power Station ML18120A1772018-05-0101 May 2018 Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Draft Guidance for Emergency Response Organization Staffing ML18113A7052018-04-23023 April 2018 Summary of Open House to Discuss the 2017 End-of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Byron Station ML18113A6592018-04-23023 April 2018 Summary of Open House to Discuss the 2017 End-of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Palisades Nuclear Plant ML18065A8362018-03-0707 March 2018 Summary of February 27, 2018, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Planned Fleet License Amendment Request to Relocate Staff Qualification Requirements from TSs to the Quality Assurance Topical Report ML18058A5232018-03-0101 March 2018 Summary of February 26, 2018, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Proposed Alternative to the Main Steam Isolation Valve Testing Requirements ML18018B4432018-01-25025 January 2018 Summary of December 17, 2017, Closed Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Regarding Tvel Lead Test Assemblies to Be Placed in the Braidwood Reactor (EPID 000976/05000456/L-2017-LRM and 000976/05000457/L-2017-LRM-0047 ML17347B1022017-12-14014 December 2017 Summary of Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC on Its Planned Fleet License Amendment Request to Revise the Minimum Staffing Requirements for Emergency Response 2024-01-03
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 April25, 2014 LICENSEE: Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 SUBJECT
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 9, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SET 23, PERTAINING TO THE BYRON STATION AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC NOS. MF1879. MF1880, MF1881, AND MF1882)
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the applicant), held a telephone conference call on April 9, 2014, to discuss and clarify the staff's draft request for additional information (ORAl),
Set 23. concerning the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staff's ORAls. provides a listing of the participants, and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the ORAls discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary 1/ft/~ .f,v Lindsay Robinson, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-454, 50-455, 50-456, and 50-457
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Participants
- 2. List of Draft Request for Additional Information cc w/encls: Listserv
- ML14107A077 *concurred via email OFFICE LA:DLR PM: RPB1 :DLR BC:RPB1 :DLR PM:RPB1 :DLR NAME IKing LRobinson I ;DiazSanabria LRobinson JUribe for) J fRPiasse for)
DATE 4/22/14 4/24/14 4/25/14 4/25/14
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS April 9, 2014 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Lindsay Robinson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
John Wise NRC George Thomas NRC Gautam Banerjee NRC Chris Wilson Exelon Generating Company, LLC (Exelon)
Don Wartel Exelon AI Fulvia Exelon Albert Piha Exelon John Hilditch Exelon Jim Annett Exelon Paul Cervenka Exelon Phil O'Donnell Exelon Dylan Cimock Exelon Casey Muggleston Exelon Don Brindle Exelon RalphWolen Exelon ENCLOSURE 1
DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION April 9, 2014 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the applicant), held a telephone conference call on April9, 2014, to discuss and clarify the following draft request for additional information (DRAI),
Set 23, concerning the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA).
ORAl 3.5.2.2.2.2-1 Applicability:
Byron and Braidwood Background; SRP-LR Section 3.5.2.2.2.2, "Reduction of Strength and Modulus due to Elevated Temperature," recommends further evaluation tor any concrete elements of safety-related structures and other concrete structures that exceed temperature limits of 66°C (150°F) for general areas and 93°C (200°F) for local areas. The SRP*LR also states that higher temperatures may be allowed if tests or calculations are provided to evaluate the reduction in strength and modulus of elasticity and these reductions are applied to the design calculations.
LRA Section 3.5.2.2.2.2 states, in part, that:
High energy line penetrations have been designed to limit surrounding concrete surtaces to temperatures less than 200"F, except for the special pipe whip restraints that are located around each feedwater and main steam pipe as it passes through the concrete wall separating the main steam isolation valve room from the main steam tunnel. The design documents for the concrete at these pipe whip restraints include an evaluation for elevated temperatures, which determined that the concrete temperature up to 300"F at the local areas of the pipes was acceptable.
LRA Table 3.5*1, item 3.5.1*48, which references LRA section 3.5.2.2.2.2, states that the aging effect and mechanism of reduction of concrete strength and modulus due to elevated temperature is not applicable to Byron and Braidwood. It further states that the main steam (MS) tunnel and main steam isolation valve (MSIV) room walls have been evaluated and found acceptable tor temperatures up to 300"F. It is not clear if the elevated temperatures experienced by the concrete walls of the MS tunnel and the MSIV room near the special pipe whip restraints remain below the 300°F used in the evaluation and why the AMR line item would not be applicable to these MSIV room and MS tunnel concrete walls. The staff reviewed the Byron and Braidwood updated final safety analyses report (UFSAR), specifically Section 3.8.4, and did not find any discussion of an engineering evaluation that accounted for possible reductions in concrete strength or modulus of elasticity due to elevated temperatures.
ENCLOSURE 2
Request:
- 1. Provide the maximum temperature that is experienced by the concrete walls of the MSIV room and MS tunnel near the special feedwater and main steam pipe whip restraints.
- 2. Provide a discussion of the engineering evaluation that was conducted to demonstrate the concrete would be able to periarm its intended functions while being exposed to elevated temperatures above the GALL Report recommended limits. Include any reductions in strength or modulus of elasticity that were applied to the design calculations or any test results used in the evaluation.
- 3. Justify why AMR line item 3.5.1-48 is not applicable to the MSIV room and MS tunnel concrete walls that experience elevated temperatures above 200°F and the required evaluation.
Discussion: The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. The applicant requested that requests 2 and 3 be made conditional based on the response to request 1. The staff agreed to make the change and will preface requests 2 and 3 with the following conditional statement, "If the maximum temperature experienced is greater than 200°F." This question will be sent as part of the formal request titled: "RAI 3.5.2.2.2.2-1."
ORAl 3.5.2-6 Applicability:
Byron and Braidwood
Background:
Item 241ocated in SRP-LR Table 3.5-treferences the GALL Report item II.At.CP-100. The AMP recommended for item II.A1.CP-100 in the GALL Report is XI.S2, "ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL," or XI.S6, "Structures Monitoring."
The GALL Report AMP XI.S2, "ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL," Program Description states that 10 CFR 50.55a imposes the examination requirements of ASME Code,Section XI, Subsection IWL, for Class CC reinforced and prestressed concrete containments. The GALL Report AMP "Scope of Program" (Program Element 1) states that the components within the scope of Subsection IWL are reinforced concrete and unbonded post-tensioning systems of Class CC containments. Subsection IWL exempts from examination portions of the concrete containment that are inaccessible such as concrete covered by liner, foundation material, or backfill or obstructed by adjacent structures or other components. However, 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii) specifies additional requirements for inaccessible areas that requires the licensee to evaluate the acceptability of concrete in inaccessible areas when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas.
Issue:
The corresponding LRA Table 3.5.1, Item 3.5.1-24, states in the "Discussion" column that this item is consistent with the GALL Report and cites the Structures Monitoring (LRA Section 8.2.1.34) program as the AMP for managing this aging effect and mechanism tor inaccessible
areas of containment concrete exposed to groundwater and soil environments, including groundwater chemistry. In the context of the LRA, the description for Item II.A1.CP-100 in the GALL Report does include containment pressure-resisting boundary concrete components in inaccessible areas above grade in an "Air- Outdoor environment as well as below-grade areas in a "Groundwater/Soil" environment. The applicant has not addressed inaccessible components in the "Air- Outdoor" environment for this AMR line item. Further, the ASME Sect1on XI, Subsection IWL program, mandated by the GALL Report and 10 CFR 50.55a for concrete containment pressure-resisting boundary components in both accessible and inaccessible areas, is not included as an applicable AMP for AMR line item 3.5.1*24 and the corresponding line items in LRA Table 3.5.2-4.
Request:
With regard to AMR line item 3.5.1-24 in LRA Table 3.5-1 that corresponds to Hem II. A 1.CP-1 00 in the GALL Report, provide the technical basis to justify why the ASME Code,Section XI, Subsection IWL program, recommended by the GALL Report and required by 10 CFR 50.55a for concrete containment pressure-resisting boundary components in both accessible and inaccessible areas, is not included as an applicable AMP for the line item and corresponding line items in LRA Table 3.5.2-4. Update the LRA, as necessary, based on the response to this request.
Discussion: The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. No edits were proposed.
The applicant mentioned that this question is closely related to another question listed in Set 24 and asked that it be removed from Set 23 and added to Set 24. The staff agreed to remove this question from Set 23 and add it to Set 24.
ORAl 8.2.1.12-1a Applicability:
Byron and Braidwood
Background:
The response to RAI B.2.1.12-1, dated February 27, 2014, stated that existing station procedures require a general visual inspection of internal surfaces of components within the scope of the Closed Treated Water Systems program when the systems are opened. In addition, the personnel performing the inspections are qualified to Exelon job qualifications and in accordance with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training program.
The staff notes that, similar to the Closed Treated Water Systems program, the Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Components program uses opportunistic visual inspections to monitor aging effects of component internal surfaces. However, during its AMP audit, the staff noted that the Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Components program does not rely on the use of existing station procedures to identify age-related degradation. Rather, a new procedure was proposed to inspect for evidence of loss of material, leakage, cracking, and reduction of heat transfer when the internal surfaces of metallic components were made accessible.
Issue:
It is unclear to the staff how the existing station opportunistic inspections will be capable of detecting the specific applicable aging effects of components internal surtaces in the Closed Treated Water Systems program. The RAI response did not provide sufficient information regarding:
- 1. The details within the IN PO training program and Exelon job qualifications that demonstrate that personnel periorming the opportunistic inspections are qualified to identify the applicable aging effects, and
- 2. The details within the existing station procedures that demonstrate that, when piping internal surlaces are made accessible, personnel will be inspecting for parameters that are capable of detecting the presence and extent of aging effects.
Request:
- 1. State the details within the INPO training program and Exelon job qualifications that demonstrate that personnel pertorming the opportunistic inspections are qualified to identify loss of material due to general, pitting, crevice, and galvanic corrosion; and cracking due to stress corrosion cracking.
- 2. State the process-based (in lieu of knowledge-based) controls that exist in station procedures that will ensure that, when component internal suriaces are made accessible, personnel will be inspecting for parameters that are capable of detecting the presence and extent of loss of material due to general, pitting, crevice, and galvanic corrosion; and cracking due to stress corrosion cracking (e.g., prejob brief details, checklists within the work order). Alternatively, propose a new procedure that specifically addresses these controls.
Discussion: The applicant requested clarity on the staff's concern. The applicant requested that the second question either be merged with the first question or be made conditional on the first question. The staff will have to conduct additional review to evaluate the applicant's request. Therefore, this question will be removed from Set 23 and added to Set 24.
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 9, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SET 23, PERTAINING TO THE BYRON STATION AND BRAIDWOOD STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAG NOS. MF1879, MF1880, MF1881, AND MF1882)
DISTRIBUTION EMAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDir Resource RidsNrrD1rRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDirRarb Resource RidsNrrDirRasb Resource RidsOgcMaiiCenter RidsNrrPMByron Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource LRobinson DMcln1yre, OPA EDuncan, Rill JBenjamin, Alii AGarmoe, Rill JMcGhee, Rill JRobbins, Rill VMitlyng, Rill PChandrathil, Rill