IR 05000482/1986017: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20197A669
| number = ML20214N195
| issue date = 10/21/1986
| issue date = 11/26/1986
| title = Insp Rept 50-482/86-17 on 860706-0802.Violation Noted: Failure to Perform Activities in Accordance W/Specified Procedure
| title = Ack Receipt of 861105 Ltr Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-482/86-17
| author name = Bartlett B, Cummings J, Cummins J, Hunicutt D, Hunter D, Lummins J, Mullikin R, Pick G, Sharkey J
| author name = Gagliardo J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name = Koester G
| addressee affiliation =  
| addressee affiliation = KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
| docket = 05000482
| docket = 05000482
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 50-482-86-17, NUDOCS 8610270366
| document report number = NUDOCS 8612030572
| package number = ML20197A608
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 1
| page count = 14
}}
}}


Line 19: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:F. ,
. .
NOV 2 6 iSSS In Reply Refer To:
  .
Docket: STN 50-482/86-17    .
APPENDIX B US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Kansas Gas and Electric Company ATTN: Glenn L. Koester Vice President - fluclear P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of November 5,1986, in response to our letter and Notice of Violation dated October 22, 1986. We have reviewed your reply and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.
 
Sincerely,
'
3 + 7ed e,0 H. F n! .LL" J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch cc:
Kansas Gas and Electric Company ATTN: Otto !!aynard, Manager of Licensing P. O. Box 309 (Sharp Road)
Burlington, Kansas 66839 Forrest Rhodes, Plant Superintendent Wolf Creek Generating Station P. O. Box 309 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Kansas Radiation Control Program Director bcc to DMB (IE01) gj20ggg gggggge2 O  PDR bcc distrib. by RIV:
RPB  Myron Karman, ELD, MNBB (1)
RRI  R. D. Martin, RA Section Chief (RPB/B) DRSP  R&SPB R. P. Warnick, RIII RIV File  Resident Inspector, RIII MIS System  RSB  RSTS Operator D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015)  j,g RIV:R  C:RPB
    ,.y y
    ' C:RPB Q\
v RPMul s DRHu r  EGagl,ia rdo I
11/[>/86 11/ /86 -
11/Jf/86


==REGION IV==
.'
NRC Inspection Report: 50-482/86-17
F[ s KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY T>+ E-LECTRC COMPANY GLENN L KOESTER
  .
~ 55**~' ~ en "-
License Permit: NPF-42 Docket: 50-482 Licensee: Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E)
November 5, 1986 Mr. E. H. Johnson, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects
Post Office Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Facility Name: Wolf Creek' Generating Station (WCGS)
        .)
Inspection At: . Wolf Creek Site, Coffey County, Burlington, Kansas Inspection Conducted: July 6 to August 2, 1986 Inspectors: Ojd17tA)_  _
        ,:'
      /O[c/ f2 J. E. Cumins, Senior a Resident Inspector, Date Operations (pars. 3, 5, 7, 8, and 13)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOV I 31986 Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000    , ___
k & c
f]:'s g
    -
J Arlington, Texas 76011 KMLNRC 86-208 Re: Docket No. STN 50-482 Subj: Response to Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-17
B. L. Bartlett, Resident Reactor Inspector, IOf71 2 Date '
Operations (pars. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, and 13)
      \0!M!$l R. P. Mullikin, Project Inspector  Dats bN D. M. Hunnicutt, Chief, Operations Section
      /0/A.OlVb D&te '
Reactor Safety Branch (pars. 9 and 10)
_ }\ kdMre  Gl/ % lO M G.~ A. Pjft;k eactor Inspector  Dath j l  (pars. % a 10)
8610270366 861022 PDR ADOCK 05000482 G  PDR b


. .
==Dear Mr. Johnson:==
-
This letter is written in reponse to your letter of October 22, 1986, which transmitted Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-17. As requested, the violation (482/8617-01) identified in the Inspection Report is being addressed in four parts.
.
    -2-
  $
J. M. Sharkey, Inspection Specialist lo 7J &
Date
  '(pars. 4, 5, 6, and 8)
Approved: L 1h1    /6!2/
Flu ~nter, Chief,, Project Section B
  ~
D. H'. Date Reactor Projects Branch Inspection Summary i Inspection Conducted July 6 to August 2, 1986 (Report 50-482/86-17)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection including plant status; followup on previously identified NRC items; LER review; operational safety verification; engineered safety features system walkdown; onsite followup of events; monthly surveillance observation; QA program annual review; design changes; core thermal power evaluation; and radwaste processin Results: Within the 11 areas inspected, one violation was identified (failure to perform activities in accordance with specified procedure, paragraph 4).


- -
(a) The reason for the violation if admitted; (b) The corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (c) Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (d) The date when full compliance will be achieved.


.
.
.
Violation (482/8617-01): Failure To Perform Activities In Accordance With Specified Procedure Finding:
-
Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1 requires that, " Written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering .  . . a. The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide (RG)
  .
1.33, Revision 2, February 1978."
    -3-DETAILS Persons Contacted Principal Licensee Personnel G. L. Koester, Vice President-Nuclear
 
+*J.-A. Bailey, Interim Site Director
Appendix A of RG 1.33, Revision 2, Februrary 1978, states that "The following . . . safety-related activities. . . should be covered by written procedures . . . 1.d. Procedure adherence . . . .
+ F. T. Rhodes, Plant Manager
      "
*G. D. Boyer, Deputy Plant Manager
  {{. _
  + R. M.~ Grant, Director-Quality M. Estes, Superintendent of Operations
(c 'D3 n m30rm- g, 201 N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Marl Address: PO. Box 208 i Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 261-6451
'i. D. Rich, Superintendent of Maintenance
  ,       - ._ ,. . _ - -
+*M. G. Williams, Superintendent of Regulatory, Quality, and Administrative Services 0. L. Maynard, Manager Licensing
  +*K. Peterson, Licensing
+*G. Pendergrass, Licensing
+*W. M. Lindsay, Supervisor Quality Systems
+*C. J. Hoch, QA Technologist
+*W. J. Rudolph, QA Manager-WCGS
+ C. G. Patrick, Superintendent of Quality Evaluations
+ C. E. Parry, Superintendent of Quality Engineering
+*A. A. Freitag, Vanager Nuclear Plant Engineering-WCGS
+ D. A. Liston, Nuclear Plant Engineering M. Megehee, Compliance Engineer B. McKinney, Superintendent of Technical Support
+ P. E. Nichols, QA-Wichita
  + L. W. Stevens, ISEG
  + C. F. Kesinger, HP Training Coordinator M. Isom, Health Physics Supervisor-Radwaste R. C. Richardson, Radwaste Coordinator J. Ives, Jr. , Manager Health Physics
  *G. A. McClelland, QA Auditor
*S. A. Henry, Chemistry Supervisor
*J. Hawthorne, Chemistry Supervisor The NRC inspectors also contacted other members of the licensee's staff during the inspection period to discuss identified issue * Denotes those personnel in attendance at the exit meeting held on August 4, 198 + Denotes those personnel in attendance at the exit meeting held on July 18, 198 . Plant Status The plant operated in Mode 1 during this inspection period except during the time periods described below:
    . - . . - - . .. . _ . . . - - .


   .
_. ___    _ _ .   . - - _ ._ . _ _ _ _ _ -. .  . _ _ _
- ,
.
  .
  .
  .
    -4-On July 24,1986 the plant was shut down to Mode 3 to repair a stator cooling water leak in the main generator. During the controlled shutdown, the reactor tripped.at approximately 13 percent power due to a 1o-10 steam generator water level condition. The plant was returned to Mode 1 on July 26, 198 . Followup on Previously Identified NRC Items (Closed) Violation (482/8526-02): Temporary changes not incorporated in procedure as require The NRC inspector verified by review that the licensee's surveillance procedure cover sheet has been revised to require that the test performer verify that the latest revision of the surveillance test is being used. This item is close (Closed) Violation (482/8535-05): Failure to follow housekeeping requirement The licensee took immediate action and cleaned up the areas which created the housekeeping concerns identified in this violation. On subsequent walkdowns, the NRC inspectors have observed that housekeeping was being maintained as required. This violation is close (Closed) Violation (482/8538-01): Failure to establish procedures for certain activities that could affect the performance of safety-related equipmen The NRC inspector, by review of documents and plant walkdowns, verified the following licensee actions related to this violation:
. -
o Section 5.3.2 of Administrative Procedure ADM 01-034, Revision 8,
Vo e Mr. E. November 5, 1986 KMLNRC 86-208        Page 2
  " Housekeeping and Cleanliness Control," has been revised to state that hoist hooks shall be fully raised and ladders returned to their designated storage location.
,   ADM 01-001,   Revision 12, April 1, 1986, " Introduction To Wolf Creek Generating Procedures," Section 4.2.4, states that,    "Those participating in any activity shall be made aware of,    and use, proper and current instructions,  procedures, drawings, and engineering'
 
requirements for
l 0 Permanent storage brackets for ladders have been installed at seventeen locations in the plant and have been identified by signs.


i o Storage of ladders was discussed at the safety committee meeting held on April 2, 1986. Safety meetings were used to train employees in the use of ladder During subsequent plant walkdowns, the NRC inspectors have not identified any further instances where ladders and hoists could have
performing the activity as applicable."          ,
^
              ;
affected the operation of safety-related equipment. This violation is closed.
;   ADM 02-300, Revision 7, May 20,    1986, " Surveillance Testing," Section 5. 4,
 
f (Closed) Violation (482/8523-01): Failure to follow plant procedures.
 
   .-. . .
    . ._- _ .-_ .
 
.
.
  '
  '
Step 5.4.1 states, "Each test performer is responsible for the. effective
  .
  .
    -5-The NRC inspector reviewed the letter which was issued to all organizations which may be called upon to perfonn work in the plant and verified that it was discussed with the appropriate personnel. In addition, since this violation was first identified no other similar violations have been discovered. This violation is close (Closed) Violation (482/8530-01): Test port not reclosed in accordance with procedur The NRC inspector reviewed five randomly selected procedures which remove plugs in HVAC test ports and verified the procedures included clear requirements to reinstall plugs in test port In addition, field inspections by NRC inspectors have failed to identify any similar violations to date. This violation is close (Closed) Violation (482/8530-02): Inadequate procedur The NRC inspector reviewed STS IC-275A and STS IC-275B and verified that the requirement for damper movement had been removed. In addition, the sample results of the containment atmosphere drawn at 2100 CST on July 26, 1985, was reviewed for abnormal results. This violation is close . Review of Licensee Event Reports During this inspection period, the NRC inspectors performed followup on selected Wolf Creek LERs. The LERs were reviewed to ensure:
conduct  of each assigned surveillance activity .    . . ." These
o The corrective action stated in the report has been properly complete o Responses to the events were adequat o Responses to the events met license conditions, commitments, or other applicable regulatory requirement o The information contained in the report satisfied applicable reporting requirement o That any generic issues were identified, o The report conformed to the guidelines contained in NUREG-1022 and Supplements 1 and The following LERs were reviewed and close o 482/85-041-00, "ESF Actuation and Reactor Trip" o 482/85-042-00, " Engineered Safety Features Actuation and Reactor
{  responsibilities include:   " Verifying prior to its use that a procedure is the current revision."
 
>
Contrary to the above, on July 18,   1986, the NRC inspector observed during
'
'
Trip"
records review that during the performance of STS CH-008A, " Emergency Diesel Fuel Storage Tank," on June 1, 1986, that the data sheet for STS CH-008B,
      - _ .
  "Dnergency Diesel Fuel Storage Tank," Revision 3 was used instead of the appropriate Revision 4, which had been issued on May 14, 1986. The records review indicated that the test performer failed to use the correct procedure
'
and revision, even though he had signed in Section 1 of the cover sheet that he had used the correct procedure and revision. Further,  the poet-  -
4  performance review cycle failed to discover this error.


    - .
Reason For Violation If Admitted:
. .
Failure to verify use of the correct procedure and revision by the chemistry i   technician who signed the verification portion in Section 1 of the Surveillance Test Routing Sheet was due to unfamiliarity      with the
.
'
K-6-o 482/85-043-00, "Feedwater Isolation and Auxiliary Feedwater Actuation" o 482/85-044-00, "ESF Actuation-Feedwater Isolation, Auxiliary Feedwater Actuation, Steam Generator Blowdown and Sample Isolation" o 482/85-045-00, " Reactor Trip and Engineered Safety Features Actuation" o '482/85-046-00, " Engineered Safety Features Actuation and Reactor
requirement to verify the current revision with the control room and in  -
  . Trip" o ~
,   attention to detail in not realizing he was using the data sheet CH-008B-instead  of CH-008A which are identical in format. The technician
482/86-019-00, " Technical Specification Required Shutdown Due To
.
  '
  ~_ Unidentified Reactor Coolant System Leakage" o 482/86-033-00, " Technical Specification-Late Verification of Fuel Oil Properties" The NRC inspectors had the following comments:
o ApplicableportionsofAdministrativeProcedure'ADM01-033,
   ~
'" Instructions Describing Reportability, Review, and Documentation of Licensee Event Reports (LERs), and Defect Deficiencies,"
'
Revision 15, were reviewed for agreement with LER reporting requirements, r
o In general, the quality and adequacy of the licensee's LERs has
~
been improvin However, minor deficiencies were noted in the LER information requirements. For example, five out of six LERs
,
reviewed did not discuss whether any previous similar events at the i
plant were known to.the licensee. These deficiencies were discussed with the licensee during this inspection perio o During an inspection of control room area radiation monitor instrunentation and chart recorders while following up on LER
;
482/86-019-00, the NRC inspector noted that Chart Recorder GT RR-58, t " Unit Ventilation Effluent Release Rate," and GH RR-51, "Radwaste Building Effluent Release Rate," were not scaled, but did have a tag saying 0 to 100. None of the licensed operators questioned knew what units the chart recorders used. Instrumentation and control informed the NRC inspector that the chart recorders were calibrated j from 10E1 to 10E13 micro Ci/sec. The licensee committed to install i
the correct scales.
:      '
l o -0n July 18,1986,'during a review of completed surveillances related to LER 482/86-033-00, the NRC inspector observed that
,
,
STS CH-008A, " Emergency Diesel Fuel Storage Tank," performed on June 1, 1986, was Revision 3 and that the data sheet for STS CH-0088,
incorrectly performed the verification using the procedure obtained from the chemistry group file cabinet.
,  " Emergency Diesel Fuel Storage Tank," had been used. The plant safety l  review conmittee (PSRC) document control records showed that
    <; *
      -


      .
Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved:
.
l  The technician has been counseled by his supervision regarding the use of
.
'
-
the correct procedure and proper method of verification for current
.
'
    -7-STS CH-C08A, Revision 4 had been issued on May 14, 1986. The records review indicated that the appropriate tank was sampled and that the sample data met the TS criteria. This failure of the test performer to use the correct procedure and revision, even though he had signed off in Section 1 of the cover sheet that he had used the correct procedure and revision, and failure of the surveillance ost-performance review cycle to discover this error is a violatio /8617-01) Operational Safety Verification The NRC inspectnrs verified that the facility is being operated safely and in conformance'with regulatory requirements by direct observation of
revision. The chemistry group file cabinet has been purged of all uncontrolled data sheets to prevent use of an out of date revision.
>
licensee facilities, tours of the facility, interviews and discussions with licensee personnel, independent verification of safety system status and limiting conditions for operations, and reviewing facility records. The NRC inspectors, by observation and direct interview, verified the physical security plan was being implemented in accordance with the security plan and that radiation protection activities were controlle By observing . valve position, electrical breaker position, and control room indication, the NRC inspectors confirmed the operability of the residual heat removal system and the emergency diesel generator The NRC inspectors also visually inspected safety components for leakage, physical damage, and other impairments that could prevent them from performing their designed functio No violations or deviations were identifie . Engineered Safety Features (ESF) System Walkdown The NRC inspectors verified the operability of ESF systems by walking down selected accessible portions of the systems. The NRC inspectors verified valves and electrical circuit breakers were in the required position, power was available, and valves were locked where require The NRC inspectors also inspected system components fcr damage or other conditions that could degrade system performanc ,
The ESF system walked down during this inspection period and the
,
documents utilized by the NRC inspectors during the walkdown are listed below:
System  Documents Essential Service Water (EF) Drawing M-K2EF01, Revision 14, ESW P&ID(Q)
f    Drawing M-02EF01, Revision 10, ESW P&ID(Q)
  . -  -  . . .


,
Additionally, an interoffice correspondence (KWOLKW 86-037, dated 9/25/86)
.
was sent to members of the chemistry staff from the Radiochemist Chemistry Supervisor regarding the use of improper and out of date procedures and forms.
.
.
    -8-Drawin M-02EF02, Revision 12, "ESW P&ID Q)"
  .  .
STS EF-001, Revision 3, " Essential Service Water Valve Check"
    ' Checklist CKL EF-120, Revision 8,
  '
    " Essential Service Water Valve,
  .
Breaker, and Switch Lineup" No, violations ~or deviations were identifie . Onsite Followup'of Event The NRC' inspectors performed onsite followup of a reactor trip that
'
  ' occurred on July 24,'1986, due to a 10-10 steam generator water level condition. The NRC inspectors reviewed logs and computer printouts and discussed the~ trip.with cognizant personnel. The NRC inspectors verified the licensee had responded to the event in accordance with procedures and had notified the NRC as required in a timely fashio The reactor trip occurred at approximately 13 percent power during a controlled reactor plant shutdown to Mode 3 to support maintenance on the main turbine generator. The 10-10 level in the steam generator was caused while the steam generator feedwater was being transferred from the main feedwater regulator valves to the bypasses. The licensee has experienced this same problem during previous plant startups and shutdowns and is evaluating methods to eliminate the problem. The subsequent startup on July 26, 1986, was accomplished with no significant problem '
No violations or deviations were identifie . Monthly Surveillance Observation
  [TheNRCinspectorsobservedselectedportionsoftheperformanceof E* surveillance testing and/or reviewed completed surveillance test '
procedures to verify that surveillance activities were performed in I  accordance with technical specifications (TS) requirements and I '
administrative procedures. The NRC inspectors considered the following elements while inspecting surveillance activities:
o Testing was being accomplished by qualified personnel in accordance (  with an approved procedur o The surveillance procedure conformed to TS requirement o Required test instrumentation was calibrated.


i  o Technical Specification limiting conditions for operation (LCO)
'
were satisfied.
Since the occurrence of this event, no further incidents of this nature have 1  been caused by the chemistry staff.


'
l i
  '
t i
  ,
  - , . . . - , , . - - - - = - , , , . , . . , , - - , - - , , , , , , , . , . . , . . - -  ~ -  , - - . - - - , , - - . , - - - - , , ,
      ,, ~. --


.
. - . . . - . . . _ .  -- . . . ..  . . - _ _ _ - .. .__
  .
  ~
-
  .
  .
_g_
.  .
o Test. data was accurate and complete. Where appropriate, the NRC inspectors performed independent calculations of selected test data to verify their accuracy, o The performance of the surveillance procedure conformed to applicable administrative procedure o The surveillance was perfonned within the required frequency and the test results met the required limit Surveillances witnessed and/or reviewed by the NRC inspectors are listed below:
et s .e
o STN IC-500, Revision 0, " Channel Calibration Radwaste Building Corridor Basement Area Radiation Monitor SDRE01," performed July 23, 1986 o STS RE-006, Revision 2. "E0L Core MTC Measurement," performed July 11, 1986 o STS SE-001, Revision 5, " Power Range Adjustment to Calorimetric,"
:
performed July 11, 1986 o STS SE-001, Revision 6, " Power Range Adjustment to Calorimetric,"
l  Mr. E. November 5, 1986 KMLNRC 86-208      Page 3
performed July 27, 1986 o STS B8-004, Revision 4, "RCS Water Inventory Balance," performed July 29, 1986 No violations or deviations were identifie . Quality Assurance (QA) Program Annual Review QA Program Implementation Duringapreviousinspection(IR 50-482/86-16) the NRC inspector had reviewed the WCGS onsite and offsite review committees. The licensee had a method for informing supervisory persunnel of new regulatory requirements by routing to them Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins (IEB), Generic Letters (GL), Information Notices (IN), and so fort During this period, the NRC inspector examined the implementation of the QA audit program and their records progra Audit Program Through discussions with licensee personnel, review of the essential elements manual and review of sunmary documentation, an understanding of the audit program was obtaine .
. Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations:
!
A copy of this violation and response will be placed in the Chemistry groups Required Reading to re-emphasize the importance of using the correct procedure and current revision.


h
The Date When Pull Compliance Will Be Achieved:
- .
i Pull compliance has been achieved.
'
,
  -10-The basis of the audit program was the essential elements manual, i which summarizes into 39 topics (essential elements) the licensee's commitments and/or requirements reflected in 10 CFR Part 50, ANSI 18.7 (Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants), WCGS TS, and the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). The essential elements are subdivided into attributes which can be objectively evaluate To audit a plant area, the auditor prepared the audit plan from the essential elements manual type of concer Upon completion of the audit, if any discrepancies existed, methods existed that allowed execution of corrective actions as appropriate. Quality assurance audit frequencies, as required by TS, were on a biennial schedul The audits were planned on an annual basis; however, if the essential element was voluminous, the audit may have been scheduled in segments over a two year period to assure that the minimum audit requirements would be met. In addition to the mandatory audits, lower tiered audits and surveillances were scheduled to support the main audi The following audit packages were reviewed:
Audit N Title TE 50140-K116 Corrective Action dated 6/4/86 TE 50140-K096 Assignment Of Authority, Organization, and Program Description TE 50140-K086 Corrective Action dated 12/9/85 TE 50140-K066 Records Management TE 50140-K005 Quality Assurance Records The audits generally lasted four weeks. Auditors conducted entrance and exit summaries with the plant organization prior to start and at conclusion of the audit. The audit report clearly
,~
defined the audit scope and results. Personnel conducting the audit were qualified as determined by NRC inspector review of training records. The audit questions and areas of interest reflected the requirements in the essential elements' manual. The audited organizations' response to audit findings were in writing, were timely, and adequately addressed the findings and recommendations.


!
i
i
,
;  If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me or Mr.
  -- , - - -, e ,e
 
O. L. Maynard of my staff.
 
i        Yours very truly, i
!        Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear l  GLK:see l
l  cc: P0'Connor 1  JCummins JTaylor
]


  . _ _ - . _
1
. .
'
.
  -11- Records Program During this inspection, the NRC inspector reviewed Section 6.10 of the facility TS, ANSI N45.2.9-1974 (Requirements For Collection, Storage, and Maintenance Of Quality Assurance Records For Nuclear Power Plants), and the WCGS procedures listed below:
o ADM 01-045, Revision 3, " Document Control Supervisor Duties and Responsibilities" o ADM 07-046, Revision 16, " Records, Administrative, and Storage" The WCGS records program was described in ADM 07-406. Maintenance and retention periods for records were described in the TS and various procedures. The Document Control (DC) Supervisor was assigned responsibility of maintaining the QA records and ensuring implementation of the record storage controls. Responsibilities had been assigned with controls established to ensure transfer and retention of construction phase records. The controls (ADM Procedure 07-406) established for record storage were in accordance with FSAR commitments; i.e., ANSI N45.2.9-1974. This procedure described the storage facility; designated the DC supervisor as custodian of the QA vault; described the filing / retrieval system utilized; established a method to verify that records were in agreement with the transmittal document; made provisions for governing access to files and maintaining accountability of records removed from storage; established methods for correcting information, filing supplemental information and disposing of superseded records with the required reviews and approvals specifie Individual section supervisors; i.e., instrumentation and control, maintenance, et cetera, were responsible for establishing retention periods of records not covered by the FSAR, TS, 10 CFR, and for authorizing the disposal of records no longer require The NRC inspector verified through discussions with licensee personnel and a tour of the QA vault that: The environmental
, conditions and fire suppression system were in accordance with commitments; records were listed on an index; records were readily retrievable from designated files and were not stored loosely but were firmly attached in folders; and records were stored in suitable file cabinet No violations or deviations were identifie .-- ._ . . -.. _-


. .
  ,
  ,
*
.
    -12-10. Design Changes and Modifications The NRC inspector reviewed design changes and modifications that the licensee had determined were not required to be approved by NRC and verified they were in conformance with TS and 10 CFR Part 50.'5 Design Changes The NRC inspector selected three design changes that were to be submitted with the annual report to the NRC that is required by 10 CFR Part 50.59(b). For each of the design changes the NRC inspector verified: That the changes were reviewed and approved in a technically adequate manner in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50.59; that the design changes were reviewed and approved according to TS; and that established procedures were use The three design change summaries follow:
            '
  (1) Plant Modification Request (PMR) 01446, Revision 0, was originated to reinstall flow elements EM-FE924, 925, 926, and 927, which were originally installed backward (2) Safety Evaluations (SE) 86-SE-31 was originated to reverse the wires on Terminals TB4-8-01 and TB4-8-04 in Panel RP05BC for the emergency diesel generator "A" day tank level control circuit to make the wiring agree with the schemati (3) SE 86-SE-44 was originated to demonstrate the operability of reactor coolant system pressure isolation valves BB PV8702A and EJ HV8701A by verifying that the measured leakage meets the requirements of TS 4.4.6. Temporary Modifications The NRC inspector reviewed the WCGS program for temporary modifications through review of Procedure ADM 02-101, Revision 15,
i
  " Temporary Modifications." The NRC inspector verified that temporary modifications were reviewed and approved according to Section 6 of the TS and 10 CFR Part 50.59. The procedure assigned each group supervisor responsibility for approving the temporary modification as correct, necessary, and required the use of detailed approved procedures. WCGS ADM Procedure 02-101 required:
!
That a temporary modification log be maintained; that all outstanding temporary modifications were reviewed periodically; and i
that temporary modifications be evaluated to determine the need for independent verificatio No violations or deviations were identified.
:
      .
:
I J
L


  . ..
J
  ,, .
  !
    -13-11. Core Thermal Power Evaluation The NRC inspector verified that the licensee's calculation of core
!
..
  ---u---_-._  . . . . . , - , . - , . . . - . ... . ~ . - - - - . . . .. . -,.._ _ - _ . . - . - . _ , . _ , _ , . - . . __ ,
thermal power was correct and that the procedure used was technically adequate. On July 18, 1986, at 0610 CDT, the NRC inspector performed a manual calorimetric using licensee Procedure STS SE-002, Revision 0,
" Manual Calculation of Reactor Thermal Power." At that time computer point REV1118 was indicating 3407.3 MWth which corresponds to 99.89 percent of licensed full power. The NRC inspector calculated a power level of 99.82 percent of full power. The NRC inspector then verified that all nuclear instrumentation channels were reading greater than 99.89 percent, but within acceptable margins. The NRC inspector reviewed STS SE-002 for technical adequacy, proper initial conditions, appropriate prerequisites and good engineering practice. The three typographical errors and one usage of incorrect units found were given to the Superintendent of Operations for correction. The correction factor of 0.4 percent for reactor coolant pump (RCP) heat added was found to be incorrect by 0.0254 percent, since this is within instrument error, this difference is not significant and the reactor engineer was notified of the differenc The proper correction factor for RCP pump heat is 0.3746 percent or 43.6 10E6 BTU /HR as identified in the preoperational test procedure results report for SU9-0025, Revision 0,
" Reactor Coolant System Heat Loss." The NRC inspector on a random basis verified the correct number was used in Startup Test SU7-SC03.2, Revision 1, " Thermal Power and Statepoint Data Collection at 30 percent Power," and SU7-SC03.8, Revision 1, " Thermal Power and Statepoint Data Collection at 100 percent Power." The NRC inspector randomly reviewed TS Surveillance STS SE-001, Revision 5, " Power Range Adjustment to Calorimetric," performed on June 14-16, 1986, and verified that the power range nuclear instruments were properly adjusted to agree with the results of the heat balance and that data was reasonable, consistent with previous data and properly recorde The NRC inspector by review of the STS master schedule verified that the frequency of calorimetrics was as prescribed by the licensee's T The NRC inspector by review of the appropriate surveillances verified that the plant instruments and computer points used for calorimetrics were calibrated in a traceable manor and that evaluation results were reviewed, approved, and documented in accordance with procedure No violations or deviations were identifie . Radwaste Processing During this inspection period, the NRC inspectors observed activities and reviewed procedures related to the processing of radwaste. A vendor was onsite processing primary and secondary evaporator bottoms concentrates. A licensee procedure was to provide valve lineups for supplying the radsaste to the vendors processing equipment. The vendor would then use his own procedures to process the radwast . _   _
*
. .
,, .
    -14-In discussions with cognizant licensee personnel, the NRC inspectors pointed out that the vendor's procedures and the licensee's procedures had not been integrated together in that they did not reference each other and that there was no definitive vehicle by which the vendor's procedures were implemented or controlled for use onsit The licensee resolved this observation by establishing and implementing Procedure STS HC-227, Revision 0, " Vendor Processing of Primary Resins and Concentrates," which addressed interfaces with vendor procedure No violations or deviations were identifie .1 Exit Meeting The NRC inspectors met with licensee personnel to discuss the scope and findings of this inspection on August 4, 1986. The NRC inspectors also attended entrance / exit meetings of other NRC region based inspectors identified below:
Inspection Lead  Area Inspection Period Inspector  Inspected Report N /14-18/86 D. Hunnicutt QA Program and 86-17 Design Changes (pars. 9 and10)
;
-- - -  .__ - _ _ . , _ - -
}}
}}

Revision as of 01:37, 19 January 2021

Ack Receipt of 861105 Ltr Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-482/86-17
ML20214N195
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/1986
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Koester G
KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 8612030572
Download: ML20214N195 (1)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:F. , NOV 2 6 iSSS In Reply Refer To: Docket: STN 50-482/86-17 . Kansas Gas and Electric Company ATTN: Glenn L. Koester Vice President - fluclear P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter of November 5,1986, in response to our letter and Notice of Violation dated October 22, 1986. We have reviewed your reply and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.

Sincerely, ' 3 + 7ed e,0 H. F n! .LL" J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch cc: Kansas Gas and Electric Company ATTN: Otto !!aynard, Manager of Licensing P. O. Box 309 (Sharp Road) Burlington, Kansas 66839 Forrest Rhodes, Plant Superintendent Wolf Creek Generating Station P. O. Box 309 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Kansas Radiation Control Program Director bcc to DMB (IE01) gj20ggg gggggge2 O PDR bcc distrib. by RIV: RPB Myron Karman, ELD, MNBB (1) RRI R. D. Martin, RA Section Chief (RPB/B) DRSP R&SPB R. P. Warnick, RIII RIV File Resident Inspector, RIII MIS System RSB RSTS Operator D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015) j,g RIV:R C:RPB 

   ,.y y
   ' C:RPB Q\

v RPMul s DRHu r EGagl,ia rdo I 11/[>/86 11/ /86 - 11/Jf/86 

.'

F[ s KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY T>+ E-LECTRC COMPANY GLENN L KOESTER 

~ 55**~' ~ en "-

November 5, 1986 Mr. E. H. Johnson, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects 

        .)
        ,:'

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOV I 31986 Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 , ___ f]:'s g J Arlington, Texas 76011 KMLNRC 86-208 Re: Docket No. STN 50-482 Subj: Response to Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-17

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This letter is written in reponse to your letter of October 22, 1986, which transmitted Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-17. As requested, the violation (482/8617-01) identified in the Inspection Report is being addressed in four parts.

(a) The reason for the violation if admitted; (b) The corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (c) Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (d) The date when full compliance will be achieved.

. Violation (482/8617-01): Failure To Perform Activities In Accordance With Specified Procedure Finding: Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1 requires that, " Written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering . . . a. The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978."

Appendix A of RG 1.33, Revision 2, Februrary 1978, states that "The following . . . safety-related activities. . . should be covered by written procedures . . . 1.d. Procedure adherence . . . . 

      "
{{. _

(c 'D3 n m30rm- g, 201 N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Marl Address: PO. Box 208 i Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 261-6451 

,        - ._ ,. . _ - -

_. ___ _ _ . . - - _ ._ . _ _ _ _ _ -. . . _ _ _ 

.
. -

Vo e Mr. E. November 5, 1986 KMLNRC 86-208 Page 2 

,   ADM 01-001,   Revision 12, April 1, 1986, " Introduction To Wolf Creek Generating Procedures," Section 4.2.4, states that,    "Those participating in any activity shall be made aware of,    and use, proper and current instructions,   procedures, drawings, and engineering'

requirements for

performing the activity as applicable." , 

              ;
ADM 02-300, Revision 7, May 20, 1986, " Surveillance Testing," Section 5. 4,
'

Step 5.4.1 states, "Each test performer is responsible for the. effective 

.

conduct of each assigned surveillance activity . . . ." These { responsibilities include: " Verifying prior to its use that a procedure is the current revision."

> Contrary to the above, on July 18, 1986, the NRC inspector observed during ' records review that during the performance of STS CH-008A, " Emergency Diesel Fuel Storage Tank," on June 1, 1986, that the data sheet for STS CH-008B, 

  "Dnergency Diesel Fuel Storage Tank," Revision 3 was used instead of the appropriate Revision 4, which had been issued on May 14, 1986. The records review indicated that the test performer failed to use the correct procedure

' and revision, even though he had signed in Section 1 of the cover sheet that he had used the correct procedure and revision. Further, the poet- - 4 performance review cycle failed to discover this error.

Reason For Violation If Admitted: Failure to verify use of the correct procedure and revision by the chemistry i technician who signed the verification portion in Section 1 of the Surveillance Test Routing Sheet was due to unfamiliarity with the ' requirement to verify the current revision with the control room and in - , attention to detail in not realizing he was using the data sheet CH-008B-instead of CH-008A which are identical in format. The technician , incorrectly performed the verification using the procedure obtained from the chemistry group file cabinet.

Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved: l The technician has been counseled by his supervision regarding the use of ' the correct procedure and proper method of verification for current ' revision. The chemistry group file cabinet has been purged of all uncontrolled data sheets to prevent use of an out of date revision.

Additionally, an interoffice correspondence (KWOLKW 86-037, dated 9/25/86) was sent to members of the chemistry staff from the Radiochemist Chemistry Supervisor regarding the use of improper and out of date procedures and forms.

' Since the occurrence of this event, no further incidents of this nature have 1 been caused by the chemistry staff.

l i t i 

- , . . . - , , . - - - - = - , , , . , . . , , - - , - - , , , , , , , . , . . , . . - -  ~ -  , - - . - - - , , - - . , - - - - , , ,

. - . . . - . . . _ .  -- . . . ..   . . - _ _ _ - .. .__
 ~
.
.  .

et s .e 

:

l Mr. E. November 5, 1986 KMLNRC 86-208 Page 3 

. Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations:
!

A copy of this violation and response will be placed in the Chemistry groups Required Reading to re-emphasize the importance of using the correct procedure and current revision.

The Date When Pull Compliance Will Be Achieved: i Pull compliance has been achieved.

! i 

;  If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me or Mr.

O. L. Maynard of my staff.

i Yours very truly, i 

!         Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear l  GLK:see l

l cc: P0'Connor 1 JCummins JTaylor ]

1 

,

. 

           '

i 

!

J 

!

! 

---u---_-._  . . . . . , - , . - , . . . - . ... . ~ . - - - - . . . .. . -,.._ _ - _ . . - . - . _ , . _ , _ , . - . . __ ,

}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000482/1986017&oldid=3088873"