IR 05000482/1986028
| ML20210F852 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/1987 |
| From: | Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Withers B WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8702110176 | |
| Download: ML20210F852 (2) | |
Text
-_
-
._
_
.
__.
.__
_
_
_
_...
.
- s J
,
U
'
. FEB 6 tW In Reply Refer To:
Docket: STN 50-482/86-28
.
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation ATTN: Bart D. Withers President and Chief Executive Officer P. O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Gentlenen:
'
Thank you for your letter of January 21, 1987, in response to our letter and Notice of Violation dated Decenher 22, 1986. We have reviewed your reply
-
and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We i
l will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future
inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.
Sincerely, Drl;;hal S!gned By
' U. E. Gadicrdo J. E..Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch
'
cc:
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
.
ATTN: Otto Maynard, Manager of Licensing P. O. Box 411
,
Burlington, K2 nsas 66839 Gary Boyer, Plant Manager Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation J,
'
P. O. Box 411
Burlington, Kansas 66839 Forrest Rhotes, Vice President, Nuclear Operations Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
,
P. O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839
\\
KansasRadiationControlPro[amDirector
<Q NI:RPB/B C:RPB
C:RPBY RPMullikin:cs DRHu JEGag,1 rdo 1 g
2/q/87 2/f/87 2/(/,87 B702110176 870206 PDR ADOCK 05000482 G
_.
.
. -....
_. -, _., _ _.
.. -, _.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _, - -. _.
.. - _ _ _,.
.
.
....
,.
~ eML
,
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.
-2-
.
bectoDMB(IE01)
<
bec distrib. by RIV:
RPB Myron Karman, ELD, MNBB (1)
'
RRI R. D. Martin, RA SectionChief(RPB/B)
DRSP R&SPB R. P. Warnick, RIII RIV File Resident Inspector, RIII MIS System RSB RSTS Operator Project Inspector
-
D. Weiss, RM/ALF R. Hall
.,
.
i
!
l l
t
- -,_..
._ - _-_ -. --
-
-.. _
_
.
..
...
.
.
1J CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION January 21, 1987 P-
--
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission I
I
'
j, L
! l JAN ' o *'
ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.
20555
Ml
'
Letter: ET 87-0019
-
- - -
Re:
Docket No. 50-482 Ref:
Letter dated 12/22/86 from JEGagliardo, NRC, to GLKoester, KG&E Subj:
Response to Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-28 Gentlemen:
This letter is written in reponse to the Reference which transmitted Inspection Report 50-482/86-28.
As requested, the violation (482/8628-01)
identified in the Inspection Report is being addressed in four parts.
(a) The reason for the violation if acinitted; (b) The corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (c) Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (d) The date when full compliance will be achieved.
Violation (482/8628-01): Failure To Comply With Surveillance Requirements Fin.iing:
Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1 requires that, " Written procedures shall be established, inplemented, and maintained covering.
a.
The
.
.
applicable procedures recommended in Appen3ix A of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.33, Revision 2,
February 1978." Section 8 of Appendix A states that,
" procedures, and calibration," should be covered by written procedures.
Acininistrative Procedure, ADM 02-300, Revision 8,
" Surveillance Testing,"
has been established and implemented in accordance with TS 6.8.1 and Section 5.6.2 of ADM 02-300 states that, "Each reviewer of test results shall ensure that each test package is conglete including all test data / signatures required by the subject test."
%i S #i DLDk S
'3'd go.
,.., s%s seem e-mmesa, wq ois
- - - - -
_
..
.
.
January 21, 1987 ET 87-0019 Page 2
.
Contrary to the above, on November 24, 1986, during a review of completed surveillances that had been reviewed by designated licensee personnel, the NRC inspector identified the following instances where the above requirements had not been coglied with:
Steps 6.3, 6.4, and 6.5 of Surveillance Procedure STS MT-016, Revision 3,
" Standby Diesel Generator Inspection," established and iglemented in accordance with TS 6.8.1 had not been signed off by the test performer, the supervisor, and the QC supervisor / lead respectively, as required.
Reason For Violation If Acknitted:
Steps 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of Surveillance Procedure STS MT-016, Revision 3,
" Standby Diesel Generator Inspection" were not signed off in the body of the procedure by the maintenance test performer, maintenance supervisor, and the QC supervisor / lead respectively due to failure to follow procedure, specifically ADM 02-300, Step 6.6.1.2 which requires post test review to assure cog leteness.
Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved:
The required signatures were obtained for the surveillance procedure and the procedure was revaulted.
The Superintendent of Maintenance has evaluated the review process for co g leted surveillances within his organization and now requires a review for cogleteness by a maintenance engineer following surveillance test conpletion.
Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations:
.
In addition to the newly established review within the maintenance department by a maintenance engineer, this violation and response has been placed in the maintenance department required reading to make maintenance
'
personnel cognizant of the requirement to follow procedures and the importance of attention to detail.
The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved:
Full conpliance has been achieved.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me or Mr.
O. L. Maynard of my staff.
l Very truly yours, V
John A. Bailey Vice President Engineer. ng and Technical Services" JAB:see cc: PO'Connor (2)
JCunmins RMartin
_ _ -
___
._ ___.
_
_ _ _
_
.-..
_
_ _ _. _ _ _ _