IR 05000482/1986028

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-482/86-28

ML20210F852
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	02/06/1987
From:	Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Withers B WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8702110176
Download: ML20210F852 (2)

Text

-_ - ._ _ . __. .__ _ _ _ _ . . . .

s

,

'

JU 3

. FEB 6 tW In Reply Refer To:

Docket: STN 50-482/86-28

.

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation ATTN: Bart D. Withers President and Chief Executive Officer P. O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Gentlenen:

'

Thank you for your letter of January 21, 1987, in response to our letter and Notice of Violation dated Decenher 22, 1986. We have reviewed your reply -

and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We i

will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future l

inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintaine

Sincerely, Drl;;hal S!gned By

' U. E. Gadicrdo J. E..Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch

'

cc:

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation .

ATTN: Otto Maynard, Manager of Licensing P. O. Box 411 ,.

Burlington, K2 nsas 66839 Gary Boyer, Plant Manager J,

'

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

P. O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Forrest Rhotes, Vice President, Nuclear Operations

,

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P. O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839

\

<Q KansasRadiationControlPro[amDirector NI:RPB/B C:RPB 4 C:RPBY

RPMullikin:cs DRHu JEGag,1 rdo 1g 2/q/87 2/f/87 2/(/,87 B702110176 870206 PDR ADOCK 05000482 G PDR . _ _ _ _ . - . . . . _ . - , _ . , _ _ . . . - , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ , - - . _ . . . - _ _ _ , . .

. . . . . ,.

~ eML ,

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Cor .

bectoDMB(IE01)

<

bec distrib. by RIV:

'

RPB Myron Karman, ELD, MNBB (1)

RRI R. D. Martin, RA SectionChief(RPB/B) DRSP R&SPB R. P. Warnick, RIII RIV File Resident Inspector, RIII MIS System RSB RSTS Operator Project Inspector -

D. Weiss, RM/ALF R. Hall

.,

.

i

!

l l

t

- - ,_ .. ._ - _-_ -. -- - _

. .

1J CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION January 21, 1987

--

P-U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

'

I I j, ATTN: Document Control Desk L Washington, D. ! l; JAN ' o *'

'

Letter: ET 87-0019 - - - - Ml Re: Docket No. 50-482 Ref: Letter dated 12/22/86 from JEGagliardo, NRC, to GLKoester, KG&E Subj: Response to Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-28 Gentlemen:

This letter is written in reponse to the Reference which transmitted Inspection Report 50-482/86-2 As requested, the violation (482/8628-01)

identified in the Inspection Report is being addressed in four part (a) The reason for the violation if acinitted; (b) The corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (c) Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (d) The date when full compliance will be achieve Violation (482/8628-01): Failure To Comply With Surveillance Requirements Fin.iing:

Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1 requires that, " Written procedures shall be established, inplemented, and maintained covering . . . The applicable procedures recommended in Appen3ix A of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978." Section 8 of Appendix A states that,

" procedures, and calibration," should be covered by written procedure Acininistrative Procedure, ADM 02-300, Revision 8, " Surveillance Testing,"

has been established and implemented in accordance with TS 6.8.1 and Section 5.6.2 of ADM 02-300 states that, "Each reviewer of test results shall ensure that each test package is conglete including all test data / signatures required by the subject test."

%i S #i DLDk S g , . . , s%s seem e-mmesa, '3'd wq ois - - - - -

_ ..

. .

January 21, 1987 ET 87-0019 .

Page 2 Contrary to the above, on November 24, 1986, during a review of completed surveillances that had been reviewed by designated licensee personnel, the NRC inspector identified the following instances where the above requirements had not been coglied with:

Steps 6.3, 6.4, and 6.5 of Surveillance Procedure STS MT-016, Revision 3, " Standby Diesel Generator Inspection," established and iglemented in accordance with TS 6.8.1 had not been signed off by the test performer, the supervisor, and the QC supervisor / lead respectively, as require Reason For Violation If Acknitted:

Steps 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of Surveillance Procedure STS MT-016, Revision 3,

" Standby Diesel Generator Inspection" were not signed off in the body of the procedure by the maintenance test performer, maintenance supervisor, and the QC supervisor / lead respectively due to failure to follow procedure, specifically ADM 02-300, Step 6.6.1.2 which requires post test review to assure cog letenes Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved:

The required signatures were obtained for the surveillance procedure and the procedure was revaulte The Superintendent of Maintenance has evaluated the review process for co g leted surveillances within his organization and now requires a review for cogleteness by a maintenance engineer following surveillance test conpletio Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations:

.

In addition to the newly established review within the maintenance department by a maintenance engineer, this violation and response has been

' placed in the maintenance department required reading to make maintenance personnel cognizant of the requirement to follow procedures and the importance of attention to detai The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved:

Full conpliance has been achieve If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me or M O. L. Maynard of my staff.

l Very truly yours, V

John A. Bailey Vice President Engineer. ng and Technical Services" JAB:see cc: PO'Connor (2)

JCunmins RMartin

_ _ - ___ ._ __ _ _ _ _

_ _

.- .. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _