ML20059J354

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Initial SALP Rept 50-482/90-14 for Apr 1989 - June 1990.Areas of Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint/ Surveillance & Engineering/Technical Support Rated Category 2,while Area of Security & Emergency Remained Category 1
ML20059J354
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 09/11/1990
From: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Withers B
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
Shared Package
ML20059J360 List:
References
NUDOCS 9009190276
Download: ML20059J354 (4)


See also: IR 05000482/1990014

Text

6

~

'

a

i

.

!

'

SEP 1 1 1990

l

In Reply To:

Docket:

50-482/90-14

.

.

,

!

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

I

ATTN:

Bert D. Withers

President and Chief Executive Officer

i

P.O. Box 411.

Burlington, Kansas 66839

i

Gentlemen:

i

This forwards the initial Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance ($ ALP)

Report _(50-482/90-14) for the Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS). The SALP.

Board met on August 14, 1990, to ovaluate WCGS's performance for the period

,

April 1,1989, through June 30, 1990. The performance analyses and resulting

evaluations are documented in the enclosed SALP Board Report.

,

In accordance with NRC policy, I have reviewed the SALP Board's assessment'and

coneJr with their ratings, at discussed below:'

i

Performance in the area of operations was-rated as Category 2.

WCGS

.

,

attained a very high operating capacity factor during the_ assessment period.

~

Although the plant operated well, continued improvement in critical

self-assessment is warranted.

I

Radiological controls was rated Category 2 with an improving trend.'

The _

'

person-rem exposure for the last several years has been notably low. This

was attained, in part, through a well -lmplemented radiological controls

pryram. Development of comprehensive procedures to support the

established program was still needed.

The areas of security and emergency preparedness remained Category 1.

i

Effective management involvement in these two areas was apparent,

j

'

The area of maintenance / surveillance was rated Category 2.

Little

'

improvement was noted in the trending program since the previous assessment

'

period.

Better control of maintenance troubleshooting activities is

needed to ensure that operators are constantly cognizant of potentially

l

changing plant conditions.

'i

Performance in the area of engineering / technical support was' rated

Category 2.

Additional programmatic controls have been implemented

identifying and resolving industry technical issues. Nevertheless,

additional effort was needed to complete the implementation of the program

cr uges.

.

  • RIV. SRI *C:DRP/D *NRR
  • NRR

NR

  • D:DRSS'
  • D:DRS

!

MEstow

JSWiebe

DVPickett

BABo,qer CIGrimes

ABBeach

LJCallan

/ /90

9/ /90

9/ /90

9/ /90 9/(Q'90

9/. /90

9/ /90

W

-

DRP

RA

'

SJCollins

J.-

u gomery

RD

in

Y9/)D/90

9/h/90

9/p/90

h

{

  • previously concurred

9009190276 900911

Q q ^ '" r4~

.?

rx . .

-

.

-

. - -

-

PDR

4 DOCK 05000482

.

-

- _ _ - .

.

-.

.

- _ .

. ..

-

R,i'

,

i

\\

'

.

l

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-2-

I

Corporation

The area of safety assessment / quality verification was rated as Category 2.

Performance in the area of safety _ assessment was generally strong; however,_

the quality verification program was not_ fully effective in identifying

problem areas and ensuring that appropriate corrective actions were taken

i

promptly to prevent recurrence,

t

Overall,'performane*, remained relatively steady during the assessment period.

Obvious irnrovement in the area of radiological controls.was noted.

Based on.

.

the SALP board's assessment, the length of the SALP peri d will r* Tin a

-

L

15-month cycle; therefore, the next SALP period will be from July 1.1990, to.

!

l

September 30, 1991.

'

-

A management meeting will be scheduled with you and your staff to review the

!

results of this SALP report. The time and date of this meeting will be

!

t

promulgated separately. Within 30 days of this. management meeting, you may .

'

provide written comments on, and amplification of. as! appropriate, the initial

SALP Report.

Your comments, a summary of our meeting, and my disposition of

your comments will be issued as an appendix to the enclosed initial SALP Report -

and will constitute the fir.a1 SALP Report.

A copy of your written comments will be included in the final distribution _of

the SALP report.

'

TN

Robert D. h -t h

F.tgional: Admi 4 ,trater

1

Enclosure:

l

SALP Board Report 50-482/90-14

I

's

cc w/ enclosure:

Wolf Creek Nuclear Openting Cetp.

ATTN: Gary Boyer, Plant Manager

i

P.O. Box 411

'

Burlington, Kan as 66839

'

t

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge

ATTN: Jay Silberg, Esq.

1800 M Street, NW

Washington, D.C.

20036

Public Service Commission

'

ATTN: Chris R. Rogers, P E.

Manager, Electric Department

P.O. Box 360

Jefferson City, Missouri

65102

t

t

,

-_

._. .

.

, . _ _

<

i

.g

-

!

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-3

Corporation

t

i

U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission

l

ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region III-

799 Roosevelt Road

~

l

Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

-

' Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.

. ATTN: Otto Maynard, Manager

.

Regulatory Services

P.O. Box 411

~

.

.Burlington, Kansas 66839

Kansas Corporation Commission

ATTN:.

Robert Elliot, Chief Engineer

.t

Utilities Division-

4th Floor - State Office Building

Topeka, Kansas 66612-1571

l

Office of the Governor

!

State of Kansas

[

Topeka, Kansas 66612

<

Attorney General

1st Floor - The Stat 6vuse

Topeka, Kansas 666'.2

]

Chairman, Coffey County Commission

Coffey County Courthouse

Burlington, Kansas 66839

Kansas Department of Health

'

'

and Environment

.

Bureau of Air Quality & Radiation

.

r

'

Control

ATTN: Gerald Allen, Public

i

Health Physicist

'

Division of Environment

Forbes Field Building 321

.

'

Topeka, Kansas 66620

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ATTN: Senior Resident Inspector

1

P.O. Box 311

Burlington, Kansas 66839

$

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

v

ATTN: RegionO Administrator, Region IV

,

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

Arlington, Texas 76011

i

L

?

!

-

-

.-=

I

,

<

'

A

.

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-4-

Corporation

,

bec to DMB (IE40)

bec distrib. by RIV:

  • R. D. Martin
  • Resident Inspector
  • Section Chief (DRP/0)
  • DRP(2)
  • DRSS-FRPS

Section Chief (RIII, DRP/3C)

  • RIV Filt

SRI, Callaway, RIII

  • MIS System
  • RSTS Operator
  • Project Engineer (DRP/D)

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF

Chairman Carr (MS:

17-D-1)

Records Center, INPO

Commissioner Roberts (MS:

18-H-1)

RRIs at all sites

Commissioner Rogers (MS:

16-H-3)

G. F. Sanborn, EO

Commissioner Curtiss (MS:

16-G-15)

  • DRS

.

Commissioner Remick (MF:17-G-21))

16-G-3

'A. B. Beach', D:DRSS

J. M. Taylor, EDO (MS:

L. A. Yandell, DRSS

J. M. Montgomery

B. Murray, DRSS

J. T. Gilliland, PA0

D. A. Powers, DRSS

C. A. Hackney

  • w/766

i

I

,

~!

.

.

.