ML20206K028
| ML20206K028 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 11/22/1988 |
| From: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Corbin McNeil PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8811290238 | |
| Download: ML20206K028 (15) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
, , . ~ .
. %e UNITED STATES of 4 NUCLEAR GEGULATORY COMMISSION f
j r
REGION I 475 #.LLENDALE ROAD 8 Kt NG OF PRUSSI A, PENNSYLVANI A 19406 NOV 2 21988 Docket No. 50-352 Philadelphia Electric Company ATTN: Mr. C. A. McNeill Executive Vice President Nuclear Correspondence Control Desk P.O. Box 7520 Philadelphia, PA 19101 Gentlemen:
Sbbject: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TEAM INSPECTION This letter is to inform you that the NRC inta.nds to perform a team inspe: tion of your maintenance program at the Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 site on January 30, 1989 through February _10, 1989, and one week' prior to the end of the outaga, and to request your assistance in accomplishing this task. The inspection will focus on the performance of maintenance and whether all components, systems and structures of your plant are adequately maintained and properly repaireJ so that they are availAle to perform their intended safety function.
In order for us to prepare for the inspeuion and maximize the onsite time spent in observation of maintenance in progress, it will be necessary for the fecility to furnish reference material listed in the enclosure to this letter. The teaa leader will be contacting you shortly reaarding the information that will be needed prior to the start of the inspection and to arrange a suitable date for a meeting to explain the inspection and assessment methodology.
A copy of HRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 "Maintenance Inspection" is enclosed for your information and to aid in preparation for the inspection.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, Cr? f. ;.a S !c scc ty,1 Robert Gallo, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
As stated 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
- 01 3 ( j 8811290238 881122 PDR ADOCK 05000352 O PDC
.o .
NOV 2 21938 !
Philadelphia Electric Company l cc w/ enc 1:
John S. Kemper, Sr., Senior Vice President - Nuclear E. C. Kistnar, Chairman, Nuclear Review Board Graham M. Leitch, Vice President, Litterick Generating Station J. W. Gallagher, Vice President - Nuclear Troy B. Conner, Jr. , Esquire Eugene J. Bradley, Esquire, Assistant General Counsel W. M. Alden, Director, Licensing Section Public Document Room (PDR) local Pu'.311c Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspector Connonwealth of Pennsylvania bec w/ encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant, ORMA (w/o enc 1)
Section Chief, ORP Robert J. Bores, DRSS
?fD? -
RI:DRS Prividy G lo 1C/N/88 ff/ 88 0FFICIAL RECLRD COPY PRIVIDY10/25/88 - 0002.0.0 10/25/88
7 , . , ,, ,- . . -
l ENCLOSURE To aid us in preparation for the maintenance inspection please provide us with the following documents, procedures 4 ' information in accordance with the designated numbers. If you do not have the requested docuroent or information, it is not necessary to generate it to comply with this request. We recognize that many of tho documents requested separately may be inclusive in a larger
- single. document. Please.: provide five sets of the wquested documents. A member i of our staff will . contact you regarding the best method of transmitting the .
documents to us.
Section-1-Description'of General Plant Maintenance Activities 1-1 Maintenance administrative procedures which describe your corrective, preventive and predictive maintenance activities.
1-2 Organization charts including the maintenance organization and plant wide organizations.
1-3 procedures, charts and other documents which describe your Planning Department and its activities.
1-4 Documents which describe maintenance planning and scheduling meetings and status of maintenance reports.
1-5 Documents which describe the Maintenance and Operations interface during planning, scheduling, work start, work closecut and post maintenance / functional testing.
1-6 Documents which describe your work control process: how a work order is started.. planned,-executed, completed,-closed out and equipment returned to service.
J< Documents which describe training and retraining of plant and contractor maintenance personnel. (For maintenance activities only, do not include GET.)
1-8 Documents which describe interf aces and communications among.the technical support, engineering support and the maintenance /I&C Departments.
1-9 Documents which describe maintenance work procedure establishment and control: Criteria as to when a procedure is to be used; initial writeup; reviews and approval; revisions; human factors reviews; QA reviews; requirements for conduct of work; troubleshooting criteria; work closcout; post maintenance testing and restoration of systems.
. 1-10 Description of methods by which maintenance performance is measured.
. Are performance indicators used? What are.they? Who is informed of the results?
. _ _ _ _ ~ e.
,. o ENCLOSURE 2 1-11 Description of process for cousnunications with vendors for technical services and latest technical information on equipment and systems installed at the plant, and interfaces with vendors or NSSS for training, wodifications and equipment replacement.
1-12 Cocuments which describe the preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance programs.
- Which 1 equipment is' included?
- How is maintenance frequency determined?
- What is done with results of these maintenance actions.
1-13 Documents which describe management involvement in. maintenance.
- Are there. goals set for.the. maintenance .and J&C Departments.
Are these goals used in the performance evaluation of managers and
.,'. supervisors?
- Are these goals communicated to first line supervisors and chiefs?
Section 2-Status of Plant and Contractor Personnel Who Perform Maintenance.
2-1 The number of craf t personnel for electrical, mechanical and I&C maintenance organizations. Please include foremen and the foreman to craft ratio.
2-2 The average years of experience for each individual and the turnover rate.
2-3 Description of shif t work and work assignments. How do foremen decide on which craft is to perform what type of work?
i Section 3-Status of Plant Equipment and Plant Maintenance 3-1 What equipment failures occurred during the last year of operations?
3-2 What equipment failures have been found during shutdown of plant?
3-3 Describe maintenance and testing for diesel generators and electrical equipment including switchgear that would be required in case of loss of offsite power.
3-4 What component failures present greatest risk from a probabilistic risk standpoint to the plant?
3-5 What have been the areas of high maintenance activity on safety l
related and non-safety related equipment and components?
l 1
L
r-
..;dumaEdifiwfa;1ducu,
. .O ENCLOSURE 3 3-6 Provide -thet following status concerning Maintenance Work Drders (NWO).
-Current total listing and status of MW0s, number in planning,, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of . parts, number on hold for engineering assistance, number available to be worked on *
-Projected number of corrective MW0s to be outstanding at start-up by priority
-Rate of completion of corrective MWO in terms of number completed / month and manhours expended (by craft)/ month for the past 12 months
-Current number of preventive maintenance work orders overdue
-Rate of ~ completion of preventive MWO for the past 12 months.
-Estimated manhours required to complete current preventive maintenance MW0s
-Number MW0s-requiring rework over past 6 months 3-7 Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is
. scheduled for the upcoming outage. MOVs, PRVs,. ECS . Pumps, . Batteries, Switchgear, etc.
3-8 Provide five preventive maintenance procedures that are scheduled for the upcoming outage.
3-9 ' Provide your overall outsco schedule.
O I
l
8 e
,,a- - > +w i
, , , . : . . . ., y '
' ' .. . ,s, p 4 j, O %o s
' MUNITED STATES, _ , ' ,, .
i
!\I ,
'l . NUCL' EAR' REGULATORY COMMISSION. ,' ',
5 , .j WASHINGTo4, o. C. 20555
- a '
- pf .) *
' \ ' ." ' f Y. ] _3u
. ' I 'd d. ' 1 * ' ~
\..
l N RC INSPECTION .M A.N,U A.L. [. m .m 0t.pq ,. . .-
i i ; ,
.TEMPORARYJINSTRUCJIO Q 15/9 M [d;'n k w.id @ !
.,', .,..o..f i
$-i
! . . . .. e y , ;, ;
MAI ENANCINSP TION ( .,.gv.a.f%ad Gi <
i <
- .. :. 7 . q v .n . ,, w t. 2..m .NT.e. E.;m. . E.C~ .- .,3
.mi . %-
.1 .
L
. ' j+ g [. m;mn sfMliyMR,.p>y%n w
6 b%;@oW'l4 p,y g, w m p.o.7sy, M U W b W ' % . Y.i :
- l. x ;c 7 ,q. ,
- 9
]PR{0ggy g g gg i
,]' 4, y Q l5/.,a,7[01 VM;.gTtQs; temporary,@. :cm, .quH r
on g s,g.g,ggf@Wu.s.E(,.tQ Mtd rRpbMzntg eneyegguidancepforsconfuctfpgkajpggor rovi '.m V ;-
h,mance' based iinspe,nstru,c, ct,[{nj fjta.h,(JL/j np e,s Igsfe,'d3a,r$,i,mpjem,e,n,ted A mainiena, rice,,pqcess;,.,. s, g. , l
.+w;y Qt
- at v Wap LV 'i O allc r '.n operating nuclear.
u w. powert st'a' ions a - de~ h.Aw"% t, ,W.W s..
- ~
s{Q . '
QJ "%,f ^
,v , . ,
.r:x .am::.pf. BRf MyQ&q} f }-llQ
', 3l% ' :Q515/97-02 ykQ;dy&sy,%f+Y$[f, gg% g% - 7b y y gy! )(Lf I fg 2 i M', X', a' OBJECTIVESg,Q,,4 y ; .
prima. ry : ob'j%,ive d. . y',th {. cf 't h gh t %ghi.M o f d Wr s n id.W ' determine w ect oft ja 'Th s ,
.ofi nucleap; power 1yj mA,igtiajnedtsod.: y I L ,i n A systems,'.and / structures;f. , otoNierfc[
~S.
< that) they /are . ava.ilable this .TI should ? determine (whe,ther/'th.el ma nter%Iedfuh~c, ti6,n's. a; , , -
I pr,ompt' repair of{planticomponents',Msystemsigandistructuresprashappropriate Y e 4 8. .o
[ .Mfh[T,b*r ""b" hhTMbAh hh
- k bb. .
m.1:M y ,d.rh.MbnOnt%)Qt b S.WS 12
^
a.' '
' - * *; but d yrb' N W?MW W.}r?W >W}It? k'3 a ; :' 2515,/9,103. 7 ' B ACKGROUND y n;.W.W.g q gg.gg ;iv*@q.yg*% W3 MRWm i <
- 7,.
2 NR.Cs -.has ex;amined thi g ,y , e4 0 gn:. u% 't p . M .ut 3 w .no b.d.ha n a ifound.'
u, w .
maint. -
sw.a: wideuvar,iation;in.el1 m
o., ei g+.'.r.ucle.ar cti e r.gss.
tp.o.w.V.r;p;l,an gJnade.e.nanpej
~. .
- quatu ma ntenancqc p,r grams = a.n.3 f}asy " a.
L n
.(
5 g
[s',i' n,1fic' anti'conceibyt'or"toi ontr pyc rnMnaJy , s of op,Jsyjtem),fejidiijityap%li iat1,nu.cl Nsba6df,th.u leary,a ,
I.
afety ef,atif onalf,eventsj haus p,is~.a
' power -
%' plant ,co.mpone.
. s 1
7 ts mairi 6e on b
- nts areJn.ot$;'
a '* comensutateswith ej(lng
-o t
s"s -**v't, l their';s importance:,to, safety. g g g,,fg g g ,. g ;r.;g.{r, M w gi p s M ,
l This'Tl w'as deveioped'lt'o'p.n i.minspect and.. massess.the effectiveness.of maintenance 2
n w r O % n a<ww i, at selected nuclear. power plant.. sites. A Maintenance Inspection Tree.(logic tree), will be used as guidance ' during. ,these' inspections to collate.; and s present inspection findings. .The. tree is.. intended to provide.. a systematic s approach to the performance of' the' inspections and to ensure consistency.
2515/97-04 CONDUCTIt!G TEAM INSPECTIONS The maintenance team inspections will be announced when the team leader prepares for the pre-inspection visit (Section 04.01) to the site. The full-scope inspection cycle will generally be of a 6-week duration, with the team leader possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinate the
) inspection, gather information, and issue the final inspection report.
Issue Date: 11/03/88
The 6 weeks of team effort should generally consist of I week of preparation, I week of in-nffice inspection, 2 weeks of onsite inspection, and 2 weeks of documentation. The sequence of the inspection effort will be determined by '
the regional office._ For example, the 2 weeks of onsite inspection may be <
)
consecutive or separated by 1 week of in-office inspection. '
a Generally, the inspection team will be composed of the following six members:
- y s
one team leader (region)
- l. - two . reactor / project"engineers;(region). N -
~' '
I, y' ~ i b .f ' - -
- one radiation s twofengineers'(pecialist:(region)
'~
..~ <
[ HQ) " - " ~
' ~ "
]'~ , Jl ,
5- '
I The team' composition and/$I'h5 t 'eNed of"effort .for, individual members may .
7 A . be fadjusted by(the; region.' For ' example, the .extentJof involvementTof ithe . : .
dW qt,j@; ,i A radiat.ionispecialistE regionalt office @,Inf additionMthe may"bellessithan?
regionss mayf include?6;.fu11 s weeks,i as,'pd involvementkof4thed 1 W7 'r_esident ex a'm i h a't'idni%T hb 4RIdh thatnisinorma,11yj. covered3byAIP o'u l d 5 b e ?p rov fi d e d it r'a i n V O Mm6nthlf(dinspectoru(RI)dt6%thei: . M,A s q q.y M6 a extent.34, 3r/li Md . ((
W n WM . :M &j <ct M ~ y,fp U i ma n a g erinvolvediwith 1:
.; ( PM)y g!?G;'lfQ"l h i4 ly(N
['LA.aTheyproey Uthejfollowir$ 9;gillfbegenera'y>:J g.M extent:
?
Wg,.g.pyggWL N%j ,l p .3:9: 39.;
n y, g ( quQ@q{ , __, w der to: 3 x facilitate 7..,,,3
{' contacts ;a- (w f > the,teamilea be'available toj C h M "4 ^ *' 4x ',
x W W Mlice'n's'e'e * 'd /"*1 FJ -
- f ' ]
F thm rjpa[rhn[ Q.1h h f,h, h h.-
.r cl:
hj[y hg, %!at'teridi:1Ct'oV2Nahf*Qam ten l nal,pr -
i ng
, pg! nee #VM.r[M{ '
V. A;mu ..o W. x,,.,rg n m rE.: %ew N mM .m N aW@e%., ,3,pw
,9 -@"$W9 y m g ., mMt. ?,,
' .Y - > < ,
w1 .
Th'eMteam Tw.illPdetermine% wha brecent,%failuresWofbsignificantle'quipmentop ni l
, p' . / (probabilisticlrisk,;assessmentM(PRA) identified,fsafety'-related or? balance @ 'Yi of plant /(BOP) thaVaffectsIsafety-relatbd 'andispecialiinterest atterds)ihavel E ' , ~
j i occurred and will; inspect;the 11censee!s;maintenancelcisiv'ities to scheVule, il 3
J repair',, and pr^ event furthernfailure r of ~ thatlequipment.c j ;0ther[ selective' '
I
^
' examina tions 'of eq"uipment"f a11u res5a'ttribu ted,to' mainten'ance: willlfbe exarniribd .
determine' 'the a d eq0idi f 'o f# l i ce n s 6 e y co rre c't i'v'e t a c t i o n'sM n'd Croo't% c^a u's e f
' 1
'y ! to$'erminationstof idet i the ' f a i lu rEs ? The ,',i nspectionf shcu ld ' be%p e rformb'djfo'l l6 wing - 1 A, ': review 'of 4the"eleme'ntsioff theMiqtenance'.InspectioriiTree t(working. sty e)fand -
1
> the "a'dditionalJ inspectio& gUida~n'ce?providid in Thef.MairitenancbjInspection; . e Guidance Volumes l'and II (separately' distributed). 'This' guidance shoilld be' d '
- used as an aid in . determining : adequacy and implementation.,of . maintenance i activities and to evaluate' them. 'The' tree is also used as'a tool.to,p.rovide
~
A uniformity in inspection stre<:ture and in the preliminary recording;of. the inspection results. It is it,.ortant to stress that the tree does not. drive ,
the inspection, but it does represent guidance on the areas of inspection to ,
be addressed, with inspection results recorded on the tree to the ~ extent completed. The tree consists of three major sections: (1) Overall Plant Performance, (2) Management Support of Maintenance, and (3) Maintenance implementation.
The inspection requirements for Maintenance Implementation, which focus on the plant sy stems , components, test and surveillance data, and re la ted activities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including direct observations of maintenance being performed) of the inspection effort.
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
l 4
It should be recognized that inspection results from .the..llaintenance Inplementation area will also provide input to the Management Support area.
}
It is expected that portions of the Managenient Support of . Maintenance ,
sections of the tree, especially the !!anagement Commitment and Management l l Organization sections, could be conducted by a single . team member in a j
- relatively short time. ,
The ' amount of J inspection effort devot'ed to.;the LindiVid I s'u secti ~ s of: '
i s the tree will~ b.e : determined1 by; the regional.' office', ta king Cintoffaccounta ih'f recent5 inspection
'tionsjplannedtocoverlspecificareas..
findings, timeland g'f staff
@ L gy,y ' limitation "b (s,
f
> & % ,.: +v.
-,r.nywwcmpyw ,'3 , ]y n The* inspectien,is;'s to- determine ,... . . .
t 1 imaintenance. p'rdcess5 ~ t of.? h61Vo'w'er,the]
$eactor < lic'enieds effectiveness ATheY5foFe's >ofgtheptotalb theiteami integr
' ~
41nspeetion 'may'c b6] dire'cted tinto l'~M'. ' iments : mayf not? exist.WThus*flf areasf forfwh'i'chTexplicitdeg'ul
. ! rather.dthan'ptowardithekfdentif.if 1 9.%
w 4 dWcationtof& ;theVp'erformance?ofjnsintenanceactiitties;ff an} areaVnotis~ub'jecty iolstib6sB;fAishidifi'Wceximplelo ithFth'e41nstitufeg6ffHuc.lEirh
~
$x "
breqilirementhis7)theMlicensei'/s M Power /Op'irat'idns (INPO) p'((a'rticipatior@jissdl lice 6se'e ;l f ;O cordah.6'e With htis>, fob se '"a g i J ' %Wshalls bel conducted $frWa'clJReyilw o kh t i o'n s9 (i n y t h i s O a riab wh e dNir~r)a n t ed , is h ou l dd b e';se a t e gR v i
.. strengths or aweaknesses.;w%"?JF rmy pu m m .. c t s. hm . ,~ ;
WS
-- ~~"D 'ly $@;
. m ! WNW
...n. '%;
. M g2" p%(W.
P. f m <
t atWQ s .
? Alth'ough' the(inspec;tionanayiresultbinlth'ejidentifications h,6Winadequacies
,6X
- o t~o7hd i T
> Rare inot eoveredtbyfixplicit'! reg'uJatorfjr,dhui,riments,) thegePisino inte' l ' l:M , J. u; "ratchet" Elicensbe sPMIndiv idua l afi nding sitha ty.lic'ensee ss aFeino dl.1 ing g M Q ,y i 8 ; ap thatd W. y '
}
M'a"ublishe(NRC?guideslan'd.iindu'strffguidelines"do.notinecessard1M.findc~
programyor! ariah islinadeq~uate'/FThe? goalgof4the3 inspections eff6' sytoD M d':
' Nemphasize1thsfuseYdf7 plantVe'xperie'n'ce NtestCandY siirieillan'c"e'ddata recent V E,$ 9 component ifailures',a PRAMinsights15nd ' items fof81'nterist3f nTeval6atingstheB $-
. . licensee's maintenance process.tiniterms of.icapabilities;and. performanceKand.
~
O WgO toi! identify majort strengths i and'weaknEsseskas ;theyrarefrelatedhtopsafeth M N
-significanceT ' Q'j,, 3 ;.s0 Q Q Q lp j,? ?.3 j .,3 G M Q 1 .' A ;
N I
()tr ad Prha i A ul bbla edIbfd el h s cop.el o.f?.t h eyi n s p e c t i o n ' a n3d f t b 0th a'i pieljmin- M. 'q
' Tthellicensee to .describec.the, f asttheilicensee's?.proceduresJfor.; planning 7 'f
~
n ary 3 reviewMmaterials,M such -l iconducting and'. asses' sing maintenance, .as;wellias'organi,zationalycharts,iwork: '
,.M schedules, equipment lists, component failure : data,7 complete'd' work orders, '
i
, and related quality. control (QC) inspection procedures.; The4 material !
obtained by the team leader from the licensee should'be' distributed to ;the.
< team members for their review. Following completion of thelin-office, review of the licensee's maidenance process, the team leader wi.ll discusst the-results of these reviews with the team members and factor them into the' plan A for the onsite inspection.
04.02 Inspection Preparation, in preparation for site inspections, the inspection team should review the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree to determine which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may not t,e applicable, and which aress will be reviewed at the plant site.
t The three major parts of maintenance (i.e., overall plant performance,
! management support of maintenance, and maintenance implementation) should be l
inspected to the degree required to provide a valid conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance program.
)
l t
?515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88 i
i During the preparation phase, the team should select several components . !
and/or systems for detailed inspectio'n either: through ' consideration of: PRA- ;
insights, recent component failures in safety-related or B0P. systems that k' )! '
affect safety, or selected ' equipment of heightened . interest to the Commis-sion, such as check valves, motor-operated valves', solenoid-operated valves, and air systems. The PRA insights may be used 'to; select, components: orJ '
~i activities whose potential failures are predicted:to ' contribute /mostato1the' ~
- risk at that , plant. . At . _ lea st one , high-rj sk , system ; shouldf,bejincluded' toi ,, '
)s
- verifyf that. a l,1 performancebrelated . mainte, nance phaslbeen 6 accomplished, -
j ', _ ,! nincludingL preventive'. ma'intenance. . ?. Recent. equjpment -failuresdprovideQla j vehicle' for 're' view "o'f laHous aspects ' off maintenanfe',%includingr.ro'ot-cause " 5 4.. @
analysis, equipment history, corrective f actions, UandO pasth maintenance , R,
~
(preventive or corrective). Inspection,,of;failedgequipment,n re p,ajr.sfor4workit d';w .Pt ,
, a packapes will!p'rovide"the' fop,p,. ortunity,,
pW
,s c~ % a ctionD of "a'll licens'es'[functionsysup;to,,examineYthepadequacyto p
- b hh,o r t i gbmsi n t b n a'n~ce';p,1,n c l u h d
,s ic # g"h.'([fD
. . , / JRb' view t of;p w ,'o ,,
pe ,rmance , A.g%,y$ h
. ;,c,4t indica tor,daja ,asys.mubi.hVamtemati M" jp p.n C h l..t t pe'rformanceV,rfo. ALP frep'o'r tsdrev,3cijs'Qinsp fjddisgihy leht S.hcensee'aRP l
Drepo'rts 3 (L mRs),u)ain'tenib'cega'diat' '
ion b ple'ctio'nh,ca $ k Qsas
[6 idedt'ifyCpotEntial / area'syajf th'atM, ant > f yriti~c mo
& .,NM@ M
$j "'?,7 , M dea tMil ed Yip c
Gineasur6s?
sp n inah u.ifed.7,F fctio'7.,m'ayZb,e]f[eq 5 ojenter,jth t 6 tree: g n g p4 p g%g N.
.,j..,.t. .. *A,:...
. mW W :/,Mrd6 m..e VS Q (cMj wb %
. phase, a prograr3,1 strength'saanddweaknesses 4 t,cer I ," .'.ait(;Du' areas'may!bP ring j,the, recorded' preparation ,.
on' the ' Maintenance yInspectiongTyee,.I(workingt ge) W
[, , NE t h'e t re%re s u f f i c i sn f. da'ti\ t o,' pVdv] de, ay -
- ':ti6n oin ?.accordance q thegaigtenance$@gfi go , , e hXW AI6spe,Tthe? elements 7shoul,df be , fated 61 tem {a[ndQ [Mthp,artj cu1Q,g{,
.r ~c 't'i o n"Gu'i d a'n ce. HoweverQ,elcte 1 1 ifiedaduring4the w 4 weaknesses % should !b]'ef ver'ne'd dur is onsiteg r nspect .hO%g,fg y: an % W
'm Fev'alua g,. o wti6nhatirig 'y"a ssig y gg,.
[ ,
mc q < ;; p:g 4v
- j. 0 04.03? Onsite"Inspection.', An entrance meeting ,shal1;be heldgwith i theldicen-M f g; ,,,
- Esee :toi detail y s t e -
members', a andthe scope theand 'sch~edule of the1 inspection, 'introducesthegeaml$
establish f
, team should obtain,fromj the;licen;see 3he statu'sjob going tioror th pr i p.g , u
, si the ji n s~pe c t i ori" otand r f athaplanst lfor . emay [a
.xj(ef nspeq f ecththe pe rfo y ro
! ninspectionNchedule'.l,,(Schedules ,me,e.tingsi
',thec and, th.e,ef : ?
j iinterim' meetings
*be' established ring' the entrance between me'eting.} theG.'d.Mw-W1 teamtleadeG M Md'T' .andylic jT rO
'l ' ,
~
> .,n ,,
<. . w. n i: . - bra ' ' a Y ~
' Team members shall perform a detailed walkdown;inspe~ction of the plant.onsthe 4 f' first or second ' day on site.,to Jobserve Ethe, overal.1 plantiand ~ equipment. , i, This ' walkdown inspection, in. which .the team should material condition.
observe the condition of' numerous valves, ' pumps,. moturs, Letc., should e b A include, but not.be limited'to the following:
- Condition of components Significance of tagged equipment Housekeeping and environment Adequacy of labeling Comparisons wi'h drawings and/or procedures Status of annunciators This walkdown inspection may provide indications of areas requiring further ,
examination during the inspection. i Issue Date: 11/03/68 2515/97
$ 9 Se The onsite inspection should focus on the direct observation of work in )' T^ progress, including the following of licensee work with equipment in progress (e.g., tagouts, procedures, work packages, engineering support,
( ) materials, communications, testing, approvals, quality control holdpoints 'I 3 ' l etc.), significance of: the maintenance backlog, rework, licensee assessment ( .of the performance of matntenance, work control processes, contro.liof. inter-
. faces, post-maintenance testing, plant material condition, and maintenance
~
n ' lf. ,
, ofacilities.
,: 'i' '
? ~<
~
T x .. : .
. : 0n. the. basis of the collected ' data, :the' team should detsrmine theTppaient.
y '( y .c . cause ofiany problems.noted; that is, if the cause is,related.to the adequacy n s d ofiprocedures, . work a pac.kagess,1gualifi.cationflo'f1 personnel $ management,' " l . . 3
'jg engineering,'etc. .This. analysis should , provide entry into' specific' elements ofgtheltreeb which tthenibecomes a f tool tovexplire;thets'uipected.piauseif andi f.
jf p "- j;itos f assess gef fectivsnessiofc :theJimplementation iofi' applicable e G ib.@p, garea$listedineedinot^ bel usedi;inaforming6conclusi'on'stf6Ke ,ld hdMtgurthermoreE
~
jhyg
- t. i entry /.toitree. elements W othdr;areascof L ',f . .. 1"Cm'inspectioniselecte
.q%.7TOWPMEW W,gj L. L :i t'S 6 M
- i. hy f > pi r;(p,h M $ j @ A M @ t du W e n 3J E W m @r TTjhj '
6 bh[404:0,4 k Analysis'.")j usingh th'e f.inspsetionI findingifaddds MafntenanceqInspectiori:Treep.thehteam!shouldidetermin"e%hethsrfdsch ofjtheh Ml M ffeashinspectsdihaso been'. ade'quately: implemented . ' by(the3licd
.(A}p%gpl d
i V 6 t" aisfs't's l uieTufithei k i i A8b,
. 'i #
. A.laintenancerinspection.
% go'r3riott thereMis Tree.MThelteam ?erioughitinformatioDto williassignr aCratin
~
appliiable l,', b ?as
^
. xi Mhg.hgelFentsf I n ipe c t/ o'n! i othe'nJGu i da 1 Mn c ej a 9T. nd C r i te rD i t
? Mpfc!c#Qel a
idsnti fied wor kt sheets ed MW+W WR7h G h' %m ud@,W:bshould assidn an overallieVal' ationfratinP toUbalhi$f h3Thehteam u ~ fcc
% Q " nipectedM When ithis?analysisihasi been1completedfanEoverallfr'ating Ichn*be ' ' 'O J N ~
d 3 hMNc, determined n in ?.f a'ccordance twith! ; theT Ma intena C6 nceVInspectioriNGuidanWe e C ri t'eri a'. l ' + 3, m Na' .. 'sW "W N ".
; , y .,M wm PW"- m,n ...e ,-
! N. % G+ ,;%o ,y . pg[t .,; . .,.. ,
+en . ,
q ; , 3. n , y Before th,e. final' days of /inspectiinnt,is,s_ues,' and s . .. ,
. Exit Meeting. , p.
- P' ' y 04:y a05t, .
4 find _ingsjshould. be reduced to defin i tive wrii t ng and then ured to hi !
~
entation. .g a .. YMaiNthehresentationEyersionoftheMaintenanceInspect
'/ $ P.$ Tree and'to complete the rating roll-up.. The exit meetingr h'ould)ihElude,aE s f' 3' / M[P,e brief' discussion. of the . preliminary inspection ) findings ,using thedresenta-: 'F 1-
. ,M ".Stion Tree to depict inspection resultsvinf a]sumarysfash' ion;1 however';f thei t(1 'a. Miicensee should be informed that the, findings are preliminary until theyd-are'
~
q 'i reviewed by regional management.and the' inspection' report;is'our issue'df '- y , t-
, ;y , ! 04'.06 Report Preparation.' Because of the broad extent of the' inspection, '
documentation uf inspection activities should begin early, in the process to . ie ' minimize the time reauired to complete the final report. The final report should document the assumptions used, the elements inspected, the elements a that were not applicable, licensee strengths and weaknesses, and overall conclusions consistent with IMC-0610. The report should address elenents of the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.g., Direct Neasures, flanagement Cormlitment and Involvement, etc.). 04.07 Follow Up. Any unresolved findings identified during the inspection will be appropriately tracked and resolved by the regional office.
)
Issue Date: 11/03/88 M15/97
, l I
2515/97-05 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS , The inspection shall include selective examinations of the aspects of main- - ' tenance listed in Sections 05.01 through 05.03, including each of the areas i and related elements of licensee activities identified under' the sections. ' To the extent possible, selective examinations should-be based on observation . ' of maintenance and equipment work activities in progress / review'of . licensee . .. ,# l l implementation of maintenance procedures and controls, results of' review'of
- f [ .i
- selected documents (such as work packages, equipment'. test results neering evaluations), and. interviews.with. personnel).i W k W , and s '.wL engi- )f
{ ,1 n; n . d .w ;.' w: W % a W ? ." f' J '8 , l u . ..
~
e l05.01" Overall' Plant Performance Related to Maintenance.u .FcW M N M,"'. I, ,a m , < e.; . - tre v. . < c . W . N $ MNW. . ' N -- < J a lf Direct Measures. eThe, team' 'shall3 conductfappropriat'er examinatichsfof M
;~) 0
,,{M '.N JpJant i x o p e ra b i.l i ty ,3 , equ i pmen ta a v a i l a b i l i.ty ;$ h n'd 41 a n t Qr
- A y it -
i
' M N$ h, . y conditionIthatican 3be~ directlyerelated (AQ W f!@ @
itopthe f.., W? h T.. . J4MWijn9E [. . .... ;,s ~ V.- 18afore. conducting 'the inspection!of f plant'performanceiethe^ inspector shou
% G irev
& . 'fi. .goperating 6(3)d,iew?available plant? informationiony(1);iavailabi.lityW(2)R hf#.'
' history.' 3 Other . sources ;for;t obtaining'rtne3infomation 4 are#SALP 6 Performance; . Indicator.4 Data,n AE00-ScramhStudies','QESP 9
% Ahtuation/
,e G . reports',f. Safety: l System) Unavailabilityi Studies,1! Technical WSpecification l1 W, M @
y TStudies,
.yViolations,d Monthly.c.0perating .IReport< Datap. anf aCapacityyi Factors %from 19 a M ,
>>e 1lLNUREG-0020.'"Data ' collection should bef directed 1toithosetrrdasures\relate U
' safety ;significant. aspects t of the maintenance
' n processib. tin 4 addition $'theMMM;'{
.f. inspectorg should conduct t a: detailed;walkdownsinspection zof, theioverall' p1a'nt@ ' t ' ' y imate' rial condition ,to)assessa thei effectiveness i.of t.ther1icense'e'sMainteria'n'ceS / h i
?, '
/ I/exteinal pro ~c~essk to ,theiextent equipment.that61tDsdreflected?intplantihousekeepinghandrinMh condition.of The' scope of the; inspection shculd 'in'clu'de ' yq/;
JN l'_ examination
- i. equipment for;theyfollowing: of ' direct .'
ar- measures di! o a.N by whi -using E d J information ']
..1,. . , . .. g < . o , ': , ; & .C W .V me? $ < M i ' ' t Q p.
?q{? Historical; data ;.3 q
i?,A},Materialconditian~ g4 a.m.y .w.jp Apim 1 r:mo WWW .M rippem mW7ViNyy N Mn'y.s;d p c 1.i n ' _h,,w , q:v m . I, c l. w N w m % m h m M z u MWA.f " .'t.. . nut 9 N, # i
.;05.02(; Management Support e t v, . s of v Maintenrncem $" ' g e,; , , . .., rs.' % h &f 4h d .dqM'Wm Vb j'*WwF f ' Y 1, a .' Management Comitment and elnvolvemente The examinationtoffmanagement 1 c? [
j effectiveness concerning maintenance should be directed to deter ^ ' # - F mining the extent of corporate ,and plant managementu.awarenessyand ~ l; support of the maintenance.and resolution ofM,aintenance problems. and &* should include examination of: ' b ' f
- V 6 The application of industry initiatives Extent of management direct participation in maintenance and in corrective actions (management vigor and exar;ple)
- b. Management Organization and Administration. The inspection of l management organization and admini stra tion controis should be directed to determining how the organization supports maintenance activities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, how the maintenance activity plan has been ireplemented , corrected, and controlled, and the control of resources. The inspection should include examination ef:
Issue Date: 11/03/E8 2515/97
- Program coverage for maintenance x
Policy, goals, and objectives for maintenance
)
Allocation of resources
- Definition of maintenance requirements j Performance measurement Document Control System for maintenance * '
}
- Maintenance decision process : . '
~
f m
,.a ,e -e u ,,: m m . .r t o v ::W DTechnical Support. The,areasithat-are to,bessel'e'ctively exanined.for-c.
ithe technical support.organizationi with9 regard to' maintenance are as
^ 'MF
ifolloWsI
~
~
O
. .-i6D%*s'.ilnter,n[l[aN/,o[r po e1c'orivnun'i e A t i o~n L'ch'a'n n e l's "ShS'i N v
. ...d)M &Engineeringicontrol@yMT!8W/NW.V* O M WN.
~
4,E V pfobeis MMUEN ( > .?"'- 4} RL ., ~y 51' ,06ch0(Incorpora'tiontof/PRA$iitDthe'daIirite'n'a'niet @@MA2 ogyporgygf], , 's { l
~
c..,ij$[,jQ
. %?c(.QiialitffcbntVbl@@h y - g .NfIncorporatioritof.tra iologica tcontrols' i t Q @'@l Y . i J. .iN m -
L'M. e.$J a p. cR[,W W EinaintehancejproEeisMM b _p- g - pf ay;"Vj7.[;'.dy5afetyjRe'vlew(ConnitteesdI4#0'md. .( M N M 9 M.LDM%C.A..; D 2 xc.:rh no l
.c . .
4
' 7;9
.z
- ;.&W.94,q. s . 6. m.ula Reg
. u y.tor .y,97docuine'nt's"N
,y , yg. .m.9
. , m.h,NeqpM.
, rpP 6 M'ag jg.t
. 4, , .m f hamf ga{
n n.%p pag
@4nf,gy . ;
W. , ,9 QR..;ExamplesAof at hesapplicablegdepartments$ornop sanizations a subjectjL.to! T .5 e ".
& M thi W rW.WWtofG f:W i! M9tJ2n'ET .
s -c &'J;nM N n "slinspectiohtare:"lm WtrousMcQ@,'nih%ttNWlmdf65.D${.U ' d j!h Ace ' h:. j WErigibeeridg!(nScleTr,pnstrdidn,utioMaid%ontrolf(l&C)f % %'
*- r?' -
$,'! . KirechanicalFelectrical' Quality. Assurancel(QA)C,111' c
W ' / ensing;isystems ]etc;M)N , I.
'j Ef ta'H'N s '
n, , F(.1 .M "WM@M - '
" ; #, ,,.?j n 7 ! Quality'Controli(QC) t t A W W ;N 4 t M W W M 7
{ -
~., .: 0 $ (Health.
SafetyPhysics W~ W .O 1(HP) W hAN@hGWMWM3'I:'WC:t M M V:M ~" ' L f W :. Fire' Protection; ^ , . M.(. 1 ' 'i YiV ' " F / .i ~ t
? . Operations"' s a a,WnW.W n 'i m W N - U b3 W e
,' 5: 1
>2
.. . s "c
L
.V05.03:
'.n,e w. .
~ ,.m o.v.,,. (Mtd Q u? . .
, . . ; ,x, , v, .a m.. Implementation - . . . c .W.W on s .Oc M o 9 0; %.
Maintenance . . i worktcontrol ? p~r~oc, esp sho, uld 'be > d at S[WorkiControl .1 A.a.m . , . ,.a.m. . is offthhh,Meq'ui'
~ Th'e?inspectior "y 7directedoto,workTorder documentat'fo'n', r w
, 'W Wof!testingiin1progressy'planninMandhschedulin@lhist'ory 'andsdocument riview? 'fobser . L The-inspection should: include l selective'eiamiriation ofo e # W d l
' 4 x ' . - , ' -y '
' Review of maintenance in' progress' -
Work order control '
' Maintenance ofJequipment records and history' E Job planning Work prioritization
- liaintenance work scheduling Backlog controls
- Maintenance procedures
- Post-maintenance testing
- Review of completed work control documents
- b. Plant flaintenance Organization. The inspection of the plant r.:ainte-nance organization should be directed to how the organization supports maintenance activities, how the naintenance activities are controlled, irrplemented, and corrected, how personnel are controlled, how the organization establishes documentation, the effectiveness of 2515/97 Issue Cate: 11/03/88
,i the coordination and feedback, lines of communication. between riant !
management and craf t personnel. and the effectiveness of interfaces . s with other departments, especially operations. The inspection should - ( '
)
include selective examination of: .
.{ , w: o;
,h
- Contro? of plant main.tenance activities ,o _ mn ,
Control of contracted maintenance v .z r n 3 c,4 a m ; ra * ',
;L,,i
" Deficiency identification,- control, and corrective ,,
b ! %fd g*.gaction; system,,,wt .e .,n nu w,5 .; . rm. l h m mT. J
'b' ,
(] I{ ' c ~ ,', t.'s M *bliai.ntenance trending % r.mm mac .w6if~TUiiMi W p~7 ' , Support interfaces vu.i:( 6 - 2 y N > .. . ij,
,,ls,, Nc. Or Maintenance Faci.lities,> Equipment, and.Haterials)Controlday The Sol i,0.f.,
L*;qr,jy f.i @@g. f.p f.t . lowingyare3 o. be y selectively t a , a o examin
% fWp;.jequipment;Mgddmatefjalycontrols,o the h. C/ 4 s/ wel.14@asqfor ..theiralsu
', l ?g] M; R h M S .T.,R&Lff? %{maintenancesp @rocess:W. NIG Qf.fo.gikkgyqf4 m W, ggUjt v.f ni c.i ch D:;$@h}QM;' .
l
'. MC%g{%
A,W fplp %y J MHaintenance Maintenance h.@h, eQConiirol)and(to'oliand; equipment contro.1Mou :3ca.gl ib ra ti on N s(facilities;and We# ' 4.% b
.i . Wt-&Ohmt
, @j's,2.5 3% Q $ % h ikth
,/ Personnel Contro l,The .following;:Mk$$areas : of o personnel 'htDo?S!$thW.~
ncontrohare 6to.wh Mpj b8ffn.Q 'C i !m V .d. considerationg ?*of;J J ; staffing;yb.h60@,M ! ' qg:,"Z . j . ? train benselectivelyfexaminedf? including . - l ; Wgg' S 3 QQ w.t? 4,ning,j.a.nhquali,f .: y m Staffing jea}- ion:t
~M;;g,3g'igMy,;wc:nig,@thp.ig sei . y nf oe)@tet m:g*. N '.yyQ3 N '"
- Q M m w ark dt!t d :MJ ...qtUWyb.$
9 control y ? i yeL',1 y 4.l1i:*4
% Personnel' training:,. . : f$,fMan pira4 Q,Vf y dii"%
;h
& s 3 V Testjand;oualification' process: l. 'M1) WO % h:n M A.; W . M M b 6;7 &ARW' .O q'tq'? f AssessmentFof ~ ' ~ , !the; current 'personnelicontrol . stat i
,) ,, > f 0. g. , ,g H. ;- . (.3,gj.;,jy6g 41 : .t < t v ^l ( , .R; y, . -
?.
.; j' .w n y, ; * '- u;': a '
'~, .m I ' f 2515/97-06j REPORTit!G'REQUIREMEllTS ' -
, ,m J i My L . t * , .j , . . . th W :.~ A m v w u M 2 .50..% .y '
. . .Theiappropriateiregional office will documentNthe' findings ~and th~e~ actions . .
c!
- i i
/
;'takendinginsp,ectioptreportdand, tin addition tootheVgnormalf n
, , will, forward oner. copy, toe.th.ea. Director,t0tvisioneof Licensee'Perforbance :and . G;v q]
Quality Evaluation,.;0fficeiofaNRR,3and.oney copyr toitheaDirectorb0ivision!of 3 4 A llf
' ' ' Reactor Safety,lin each,of,,the othergegional}officeset M 6 m i.:.,W f' ,%. g t . .c
; 2515/97-07 COMPLETION SCHEDULE er -
me .- mr" se/
+
. 3 . .
a q Inspections should be scheduled.so that they,are completed within-2 years of i, ; f.!1 the issuance of this instruction. .o 2515/97-08 EXPIRATI0tt ! This temporary instruction shall rerain in effect for 24 months or until the inspections have been completed. 2515/97-09 NRR CONTACT Any questions regarding this temporary instruction should be addressed to ' A. T. Gody (301-492-1117). Issue Date: 11/03/88 - 8- 2515/97
, . r. .
2516/97-10 STATISTICAL DATA REPORTil'G s
) For 766 or RITS input, the actual inspection effort should be recorded against this TI, module number 25597.
L
- 2515/97-11 ORIGINATit!G ORGANIZAT10tLINFORMATI0tl. . y ' :,.
j-5 ,', d '11.01 . Organization Responsibilities. .The;Performanceland 'QuS11ty. Evdluation [ ' als i
. Branch 'of NRR.will provide support and .~overall[gu'idance for'? these ?inspeca 4 W l p( ' tions. '
f . f l'.; y ; f'" < I' p ;; 7 a $, +_,'.,. l ). + , - , .,. . . . :, v ,- ,, jEach[v ,: inspection:liir m 7 ' , /'o r ' y ' lann'ed Lf
! I. < ,: . 11.02 person M's, withc. Estimated 2. . of othe 6 e,we.eks Resour'ces.: Ls being<idi. i t rect Fo.,n,j'iteY- f. p ctedya.dd,i t.i..i.'o.M.(.12Mst.a 4, 4
' eNr. .,i a. weeks)V and . sly. week ,u' i n...o.f f i.ce /.i n s p e c.tio. n ',.1~ wi th4 expe. ona l.3r fef..o r t ' b.
J H,. .c F p c n,9Thi
;i totalQinc _ i.f nk Cd<fy." '
y pr. s4 b/ .7., gAv Wn, Ybh@cthe?. tionD/ ins tea'm;le,ader.,-(a. IQ totaliof t38 Vd$/W$,ludes tstaffNeeks.)y&.. eara@a 2 f. c. h. l x: .. m;s :(., ws.m.v.:y,o: - m
". A c ..?. k spictiorda'n0 x u
..pg;r, w , ,.;rq:. y: n7v .ss ReportMiting?O'm.y$$
v..,, w: .. :my,9n.y, y 7nn.sk,y@..a g ?.W ( pr%.pX,;6 n w fy,, , resge;g Paralleli!nspe,,ction'Procedu.~ c l NAN.gl.g) . 3
.c. / blNFL . % .1 ::';' <;K.4;;r;gMhSpopM M C'ccc I gordinfp lNQ.4:@gjgdgpM MMMQP
@g ,3fga t
^
T 'ilisted "belowh 4there t credithif ,taken,Sthe tinspectientreponts.should(note tthe.N g k. . module / number.? per ! IMC-0610.% The2Jreg ionRshould Fma k'eh t:ina lifdeterm16a tioris M
. ,' ) based onithe?s'copdfand'. documentation [ofcth'esinspection.'. M ,
,[J Nh77hihh M $ j.7'V .h 627b'h' /
C37702: 1., c.61700 ~ [ l'qlPcPt$@.qh?W'ptt.%us QM c; y .
/Qy?g . i
' J61725!'. . f A 7270111627051' A M/ p,W: S
- 1. ;, .,';,62700f f , .'.83000:serjesy 9
' ~ N 37828'C1P
- W 38701
- pg:',QL
;W / M k W{ *
.62702;* - ..,92700.CIP4 ,oAz i
, .38702: ;. - hW- .
K g.
.;{y {pg
- j. .
41400 62703;CIP. ;927,01 ,. fi q.{ , 4:
- .e '., w .
,-'p .,u.;a3c..:x;,;L .',a.q.; =>;n . ; -
' gyn, u .'< . ;c ,., 7
> , L
- s. A.M# b Q ' Q, .' . , . .
- o ' ,3,.9~yQ:l,..,..,'..-
3,'lu i ;, % ,7 .o.d; D O Q . v.,y. ) m .J. . y. }" Q' 4 . p. w . c . Q N y g clll
?.&:.
y .. n ' , J; h,1.c.yp,g g;,gg,3 rg.g g.a.;,.y v, ,
< !. .t . ,:
. _ g .3 .
y ; ;Q : o;.y ;7- :
,e n;s o
.p. 1
.- ,.,o ..? :n . .
,' W, , }e. rg, q;.p. y ',' yup ;' y s <
'n > -
., ~, '
. .i. ;.. . , -
.A,' a,
.s , .y ,
} -
/
i
)
Issue Date: 11/03/86 2515/97
~ , _ . _ ,. ..
$ w*
.- ~. .
. . . . .m .w , n . .
2.y.a- "
- F.IGURE 1 s c . ,
n, - u cm' TREE INITIATORS - -
.~a.- . .r .
gr..- y , ; - o - y% , M , . a.'. Pf% $derefted .- , ,g* 4 Speenfie -- . , . . . .t end eystems
-_,,a '
,, Arg, m i Problems m-e 2 Probeerne
^- IdenUfied c m - , ' Recurrkig ? .
4y w www _ (dieck wofwee. heOW. et systems) r.
, . + ..
- . . . . . r . , . -
s w . q., -
. 4
. ~ f.. g s P Team maintenarice observatione W ~= '
~
+
3.-- 2
+
s e. v ./
. ,U. -
1r R . , , qr
- m. ,
-# ', :.- % .m- ,
- s. , w*,G - - l A .
es
- v. g -
N.- <;
".,. -w* -
k e.es,.t. SpecWigs
, .,s,.ns.,.- p.,masm
- .- . u Resident lossnctor .
q- - -
~ev -. :
wowenanc. ce>earwuano , .. s s
,. " L,
.a .* , . - t ,. y
- s. 7 ,w. ,f x.., n ,
+
.. m, 1-. ' %s t, ' ---
l .c . %,.,. a_ :. m. .:,:A : ,? . - a n,
; s ,
. s
~ ~ . , - :- . . - .. .. - , _ .c,a ,
~,, ,
^
M?; c. , U h ' ,.. , m*L' ~JU~'~ #
~
E fl -> Recent ',qt.dprnent foltures - O - ' -' II (NPRDS. worborders) -
't
,..! . 4: , ",se.g m- r ' J.. W* ? 1. .f ,
cer ,, ,.. -' .-uus , , . . ,A .-:. .> S <
., t.
s t
,s
- ~ ' ,; c , , . '_(. . , -
-. tsobitenence.mepeetlen Tree I
.,,,v ..
._ w y. . a,1 s
~N"
~
-b Previous inspectkN f5n' dings --> ,
,f: ' '
9 (SSF 1. SSO64. OSTI) - - s a u '.T.. _-, -' 4 d.7*;
.u w- V,+R
*H .
,f ava
, *~
b .
- .- w
,,x..,., a.....q . , _. e.
- ww :. ..n ;r.s. n g m. , ,, . . . ,
-- - c
. .:m .,37- - ~- ~. 37,-
- ..- . . 3y w -
~ _
m - .
. a
' * ~ '
C -b Mointenance-related LERo -----D '
,\ '1 - P ' :,G-. noe c_..
- o. $ *
> * ~
. Proced uree
+- ~
Tra.ining Ls .: -g m,... .
. es.r,4.nenee AnoWie .
s,e .
.e . ~ - ..
,- . . ~
< . ..5'
*4 !" ,; .v w , s,.s . ,.n .m. ; e, : , -.~.. ~,; ,*'
,e uo.nt.none. su.e r. ports --> o. ,c . - -
- r. .
~,.
e w y vo~ agg.ym, ,ww.,.
.m .
- s. . ,
y : . e - m
~ "
a yW ' INSPECTION %FC.OW6 es: -CHART n -: i w s s um-e m s
-?
,s.senen.no q- :.. - i ;3 y w
.v - .-
.. ~. rm::.r..g,,a,s.:
o m.w- 7; z,;, .,
-w..ng. y g ... >.> ~-
- v. . - ~ - , v . j .e : m. n .
" ?:, _ J,,e- - ' * ,
*;g, u's. ~. yFa' .*-...ga . -C ~ - m.svg :-(),:!; y .
- a
~
1C . ,* ' a . < C %C. y,; - n 4. . . f a a:
, T ( *,3 k(*'.A'S .-w .m ;$[d-5% e ~ w J u. Q '%[.'.;4"Q-[h
;+:-w. m - f.n .* %
g*> * . , s- 4 **. # * ' 8-1.5M ' # '4- yre.'. g- < ,,- 's 's < '3 + . m G, " 6'9.(' , Wr 8v-
.e%.*m E.k'*$ "a= (v.* y*F e.8%
~-, - g ., ;,
r . x%.c - .p n R*yy . z . .. n 2n : Ju*
~
v f '
...q.'
'. :4 }x;;. : g,,A,.'a,,u.; _
c-g;"<,,y,g&;f. 7 .: . ; -
. - f-g". ,
.Q,
~;
_.- ... .- -w. . ... w. w- - --. - -- -- _ - - - - -_}}