IR 05000424/1988007

Notice of Violation from Insp on 890327-31.Violation Noted: Corrective Actions for 890328 & 30 NRC Violations & for Previous Commitment Made in Insp Rept 50-424/88-07 Inadequate & Monthly Review of Info Tag Log Not Documented

ML20247M090
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	05/15/1989
From:	Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247M088	List: IR 05000424/1988007 IR 05000424/1989013 ML20247M083
References
50-424-89-13, NUDOCS 8906020357
Download: ML20247M090 (2)

Text

To f y c . ,

.

Q >

.-

' < .

r y .7

' ,

p

. ENCLOSURE 1-NOTICE-OF VIOLATION

, . . .

.

-

'

.

Georgia. Power _ Company '

Docket No.-50-424

.Vogtle Unit 1 . License No. NPF-68 L

During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection ' conducted L on p

,

March 27-31, 1989, violations of NRC requirements were identifie In

.accordance with .the' " General Statement of policy and Procedure for NRC -

Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR .Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violations are M listed-below:

l ' _CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires that

.

measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are i

promptly identified and~ corrected. In the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the . measures shall assure that corrective action is

,

taken to preclude repetitio ' Contrary to the above:

' Corrective - action for a previous NRC violation was inadequat Specifically, on' March 28, 1989, the NRC identified three operators who had not' read the required reading book in a timely manner. This was a repetitive deficiency in that in August 1988, NRC Inspection sReport No. 424/88-33, documented violation 88-33-05 as failure to take corrective actions to preclude repetition for.this deficienc . Corrective actions for a previous commitment made in NRC Inspection Report No. 88-07 were inadequat Specifically, the licensee committed to cover the use of TS cooldown limit curve (including temperature and pressure instruments to be used) in requalification training'for licensed operators by December 16, 1988. Requalification

, training conducted after this date did not contain current TE cooldown curv . Corrective action for a previous NRC violation was inadequat c Specifically, on March 30, 1989, the licensee's survey of FSAR Copy l 125 identified several pages that should be deleted as well as some mi ssing . pages. Included in the missing pages was Table 3.2.2-1 which was previously identified in violation 424/88-33-03 and

. subsequently reported as corrected in December 198 ,

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)

G

_ _ ____ - _-_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ __ - -__

_ _ _ _ -_ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ __

.: ..;

, . . .

e

'Gecrgia Power Compan Docket No. 50-424

.Vogtle'. Unit 1 License No. NPF-68 l

- CFR 50, . Appendix B, Criterion V, _ states that activities . affecting

V , quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, -'of a type appropriate ' to ' the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these . instructions, procedures, or

.

..

drawing Contrary to the above: At the time'of the inspection, the licensee.had not been documenting

'the monthly review of the Information Tag Log in accordance with Procedure No. 10009-C, Operator Aids, Rev.' . The . licensee failed to perform / document the weekly review of the  !

Annunciator Status Control Log for the. weeks of January 20 and 27, .!

- 1989, in ' accordance with Procedure No.10018-C, Annunciator Status Control, Rev. . The licensee failed to issue As-Build. Notices in accordance with Procedure No. 00101-C, Drawing' Control, Rev. 6. in that the changes were issued as far back as August 1988, on white paper vice yellow as require This is a Severity. Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to.the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Georgia Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional. Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Vogtle, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this -

Notice. This reply should be clearly . marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation]: (1) admission or denial of the vielation, (2)'the reason for the violation if admitted,' (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved,.(4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5)' the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. If- an adequate reply is not received within the time. specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be take FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IcWl ,

Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator I

'

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 15thday ofMay 1989

___-_________________-_____-__________-________________a