IR 05000425/2006012
| ML20217J053 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1995 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20217J022 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-237-95-08, 50-237-95-8, 50-249-95-08, 50-249-95-8, NUDOCS 9804300162 | |
| Download: ML20217J053 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. -,
a
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Nos. 50-237: 50-249 Dresden Station. Units 2 and 3 License Nos. DPR-19: DPR-25 k
During an NRC inspection conducted on April 25 through June 12. 1995 a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions." 10 CFR Part 2.
Appendix C. the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50. Appendix B. Criterion XVI stated in part that conditions adverse to quality be identified and corrected.
In,the case of significant conditions adverse to quality corrective actions shall be taken to preclude repetition.
10 CFR 50.73 a.2.1.B required the licensee to report any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's technical specification.
Contrary to the above. the licensee failed to submit a written report describing local leak rate test failures which exceeded technical specification type B and C leakage limits during the 1994 Unit 3 refueling outage. A previous Notice of Violation (50-237/249-94014-06) was cited for the failure to report excessive leakage identified during the 1991 Unit 3
-
refueling outage. The corrective actions for this violation were inadequate and did not prevent recurrence.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201. Commonwealth Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ATTN:
Document Control Desk. Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator Region III. and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within
'
30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation. (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved. (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper i
9804300162 950712 PDR ADOCK 05000010 G
PDR a
l l
.
.
l
~
should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
.
Dated at Lisle. Illinois u
this 12th day of July 1995
,
e o
!
i
'
.
+