ML20239A663

Responds to 630819 Ltr Re Nuclear Power Plant Proposed for Const at Bodega Head,Ca.Usgs Studying Geology of Area.Public Will Be Given 30-day Notice of Date of Hearing to Be Held in Santa Rosa,Ca.W/O Stated Encls

ML20239A663
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date:	08/30/1963
From:	US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Kent R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20234A767	List: IA-85-665, Discusses Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants,Including Const of Nuclear Plants in Seismically Active Zones ML20234A761 ML20234A769 ML20234A792 ML20234A798 ML20234A803 ML20234A812 ML20234A816 ML20234A827 ML20234A830 ML20234A838 ML20234A841 ML20234A844 ML20234A847 ML20234A851 ML20234A855 ML20234A858 ML20234A861 ML20234A864 ML20234A868 ML20234A871 ML20234A874 ML20234A893 ML20234A896 ML20234A900 ML20234A911 ML20234A922 ML20234A929 ML20234A932 ML20234A937 ML20234A944 ML20234A956 ML20234A965 ML20234A968 ML20234A976 ML20234A984 ML20234A993 ML20234A996 ML20234A999 ML20234B005 ML20234B008 ML20234B023 ML20234B032 ML20234B035 ML20234B040 ML20234B062 ML20234B066 ML20234B076 ML20234B084 ML20234B098 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709180072
Download: ML20239A663 (2)

Text

1 6

L4 - 0 e . *,

dul

?, %

Dear Mr. Kont Thir is in response to your letter of August 19, 1963, in which you raise several questions regarding the nuclest power plant proposed  !

to be constructed at Bodega Ilcad, California. The Pacific Cas 6 I Electric Company's application is before the Cocnission as a regu-latory matter and is currently being evaluated by the Cocnission's .

regulatory staff. You will understand, therefore, that it would l

I be inappropriate for me to connent at this time on its merits.

i

, As you are undoubtedly aware, at the Connission's ruquest, the U. S. Geologien1 Survey bennn, early in May, a study of the geology of Bodega llend. When the report on that study has been received j

from the U. S. Geological Survey, we will be in a better position

' to complete our analysis of the suitability of the Bodega llead site and to set a date for public hearing on the Company's application.

As we announced last January, the public will be given thirty days f notice of the date of the hearing, which will be held in Santa Itosa, California, through a notice published in the Federai !!cgister. In f

/-

addition, a public announcement will be issued. A copy of the notice of hearing and the announcement will be sent directly to you when a ,'

date for the hearing has been established. The public hearing will  !

be held before an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. At the hear =

ing the Pacific Cas & Electric Company must present evidence con-cerning its proposal from the standpoint of public health and safety and members of the technical staff of the Commission will prescat their evaluation of the safety aspects of the plant. Evidence con- 1 cerning the seismology of the area will be of special imporcance in the hearing.  !

t' I am enclosing a copy of the Commission's " Rules of Practice",10 I CFR Part 2. You will note that provision is made under the reguia-l tion for participation of members of the public in hearings such as the one to be held at Santa Rosa.

You indicated that you are aware of the limitations of the jurisdN' *'

tion of the Atomic Energy Comunission. You will understand, ther that local soning, conservation and the esthetics of a proposed 1

8709180072 851217 PDR FOIA g 9,L bbcj72, l i

j FIRESTOO3-665 PDR- l 4

l s

• wm F ***,6++-v6 ,% ,,m,.

,w a

• Mr. Roger Pent are metters more properly within rtate and toc.Al jurisdiction .Md are not within the purview of. the Atomic Energy Cor.njssion. For that reason, such matters will not be issues which will be con.

I sidered at the pubite hearins.

You are correct in your understanding that expenditure which have been mode by the Pacif Ac Cas & Electric Company in development of the proposed site are at'the Campany's risk. The fact that such expenditures have been unde will be accorded no weight by the Com-mission in its determisstion as to whether a construction permit should be issued. You bf.11 note that Section 50.10(b) of the en-closed regulation,10 C11t Part 50, " Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities", provides that certain activities relative to site preparation are permissible prior to the obtaining of a construction permit.

A constructica permit will not be issued unless the Cocenission, following the public hearing and decision by the Atmule Safety and Licensing Board and consideraciou of att factors bearing upon safety, la convinced that the reactor can be constructed and operated at the proposed location without unduc risk to the health and safety of the public.

Sincerely yours, c ,.

Chairman -

i Mr. Roger Kent. Northern Chairman Cratiferata Democratic State Central Committee 212 Sutter Street San Francisco 8, Callfornia bec: Chairman (2)

Cong. Lia. (2) ,

Secretariat (2)  :

Enciosures: OGC  !

1. 10 CFR Part 2- Harold L. Price, REG '

2. 10 CFR Part 50 Charles Edwards, LR Supplemental Fomal Public Document Room (2)  !

o .-,.-, L.D R 4 OGC .p REG COE.LM.

omayfp.[DLR ..

,,,9., , j. .l

.omp dr.EdwargsbL..Eaq}c3 ad

. ..a.:a0:s3.. . . . .

w

. .Nhd.L (p.. -

a peie . ...J. .y.yi h

. . . . . ... . a. ... .

, _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . - .- pr 8

._ - - -- -- -3 -