ML20006B796

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summaries of Latest ECCS Evaluation Model Changes
ML20006B796
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire, 05000000
Issue date: 01/29/1990
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9002050362
Download: ML20006B796 (4)


Text

,

Duke her Conrany flu & M a PO Bat 33998 lice hesident Charlotte, NC 2R 42 Nuclear Pwduction (Tl4)3t34531 DUKEPOWER January 29, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.:

20555

~

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station Docket'Nos.. 50-369, 50-370 Catawba Nuclear Station.

Docket Nos. 50-413. 50-414 10CFR 50.46 (a)(3)(li)

ECCS Evaluation Model Changes

References:

1) DAP-89-661, " Duke Power Company McGuire Units 1 and 2 Reporting of ECCS Evaluation Model Revisions "

S. S. Kilborn (Westinghouse) to R. C. Futre11'(Duke) -

December 15, 1989

2) DCP-89-681, " Duke Power Company Catawba Units 1 and 2 Reporting of ECCS Evaluation Model. Revisions "'

S. S. Kilborn (Westinghouse) to R. C. Futrell (Duke),

December 15, 1989

3) NS-NRC-89-3463, "10 CFR 50.46 Annual Notification for 1989 of Modifications in the Westinghouse ECCS Evaluation.

Models," W. J. Johnson (Westinghouse) to T. E. Murley (NRC), September 5, 1989

4) NS-NRC-89-3464, " Correction of Errors and Modifications to the NOTRUMP code in the Westinghouse Small Break-LOCA ECCS Evaluation Model Which Are Potentially Significant "

W. J. Johnson-(Westinghouse) to T. E. Murley-(NRC),

September 5, 1989 Dear Sirst Attached are summaries of the latest ECCS-evaluation model changes for McGuire and Catawba which are submitted in accordance with the' requirements; of 10CFR 50.46 (a)(3)(ii). These summarize changes described by Westinghouse.in References 1 and 2.

Further.information has been previously-

-provided to your office per' Reference 3 and 4..

1 1

s

, 9002050362 900129 pOh:

U m

PDR ADOCK 05000369 f,

'I

?-

PDC

.d g (_.,

q 3

h

,h~

a e'

.U. S.-Nuclear R:gulctory Commic2irn e

Jinuary 29,'1990 Page 2 I

FSAR updates for both stations will note the potentially increased peak clad temperatures resulting from these changes.

]

+

Very truly yours, i

f C 44 /

VM Hal B. Tucker j

LTB28/lcs j

Attachment I

cci Mr. S. D..Ebneter Regional Administrator, RII e

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 i

Atlanta, Georgia. 30323 l

Mr. D. S. Hood r

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

}

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Washington, D.C.

20555 r

Dr. K. Jabbour i

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation u

l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-

. Washington, D.C.

20555

.i r

Mr. P. K. VanDoorn Sr. NRC Resident Inspector.

McGuire Nuclear Station-1

.i Mr. W. 'i. Orders Sr. NRC Resident Inspector

]

Catawba Nuclear Station.

j I

.i

,q 1

l i

,5' v

y q'

t o

(/j'

'4.

s g

7, 1989 McGuire ECCS Evaluation Model Change Summary I. !

.1ARGE BREAK LOCA EVALUATION MODEL' s

t-A..

Several improvements were made to the BASH computer code to treat-special' analysis cases related to the tracking of fluid. Interfaces.

No,increaseinpeakcladgemperature.(PCT)isexpectedforthe majority of cases, but 30 F is' assumed as n' conservative estimate.

II.

SMALL BREAK LOCA EVALUATION MODEL A.

Modification'to preclude changing the region' designation.for a node 1 '

.:in a stack which does not contain the mixture-vapor interface (small PCT decrease).

B.

Correction of typographical errors <in the equations which calculate.

the heat transfer rate derivations for' natural convection conditions for ghe upper region of interior fluid nodes (PCT increase of uplto :

36.8 F).

C.

Correction of-an error in t.he implementation of-the equation describing-the calculation of the flow link friction parameter for-single phase flow in a non-critical flow link-(PCT decrease).-

D.

Implementation of new FORTRAN compiler which tregts numerical =

precision differently (PCT increase of up to 4.8 F).

E.

Correction of errors in. implementing equations' describing the partial derivatives of an interpolation parameter.with respect to pressure and' specific enthalpy;(PCT decrease).

r F.

Modifications to the small break ECCS Evaluation.Model version'of; LOCTA-IV'(very small PCT decrease).4 III. CHANGES IN THE APPLICATION'OF EVALUATION MODELS A,

Increaseinassumedgteamgeneratortube' plugging...fromSito64(PCT increase of up to 10.Fffor11arge break lOCA).'-

g

, t.:

i l

i g

g

'r i

. Y

g Al

?

q ::;.,,,

k I' I

t

.)L k _5^:5 x

  • b

,'I~

f

{

j t

g_:3 3

j qUfa' M.

j g;.

g-

. e p

hk

{p' J'3 % ;M.

V,}g}[

L1 n

.Q
-

3 yl y-V

(.;

s

(Q,,

I 4

i-tr n

a, j

p*

1989 Catawba ECCS Evaluation Model Change Summary

'l i

l

-t I.

-1ARGE BREAK LOCA EVALUATION MODEL

~

A.

Several improvements were made to the BASH computer code to treat special analysis cases related to.the tracking of fluid interfaces.

i

?

Noincreaseinpeakcladgemperature.(PCT)isexpectedforthe majority of cases, but 10 F is assumed as a conservative estimate.

II.

SMALL BREAK LOCA EVALUATION MODEL

~

' A.

Modification to preclude changing the region. designation for a' node.

in a stack which.does not contain the mixture-vapor interface (small-t

~

PCT decrease).

B.' Correction of typographical errors'in the. equations which calculate the heat transfer rate derivations-for natural-convection conditions.

?

for ghe upper legion of interior fluid' nodes- (PCT, increase of up to 36.0 F).

C.

Correction of an error in the implementation of the. equation' l;

describing the calculation of the flow: link friction parameter for.

single phase flow in a non-critical flow link (PCT decrease).-

.i

.q D.

Implementation of new FORTRAN compiler which tregts numerical precision differently _(PCT increase of up to 4.8 F).

'j

~

E.

Modifications to the small break ECCS Evaluation'Model; version of LOCTA-IV (very small PCT decrease).-

'fa s -

i

' ?

I

[

s

'?

1 l'

-l It S

' g '}

g,

,.