IR 05000311/1978032

IE Inspec Rept 50-311/78-32 on 780913-15 During Which No Items of Noncompliance Were Noted.Major Areas Inspected Included:Preoper Test Prog,Intergated Hot Functional Test Prog & Followup of Previous Open Items

ML18078A362
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	09/26/1978
From:	Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML18078A361	List: IR 05000311/1978032 ML18078A360
References
50-311-78-32, NUDOCS 7811100102
Download: ML18078A362 (7)

Text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Report N /78-32 Docket N Region I License No. CPPR-53 Priority ------

Category -------

Bl Licensee:

Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection at:

Inspection conduc~: ;ePjfmblf 13-15, 1978 Inspectors: ~. ~~~ Nichola~, Reactor Inspector Approved by:

Inspection Summary:

on, Chief Nuclear Support No. 1, RO&NS Branch date signed date signed 1/.ubi date signed Inspection on Septebmer 13-15, 1978 (Report No. 50-311/78-32)

Areas Inspected:

Routine unannounced inspection by a regional based inspector of the overall preoperational test program; the integrated hot functional test program status; preoperational test procedures for review, verification and witnessing; followup on previous unresolved and open items; and plant tour of the control room,- auxiliary building, turbine building and containmen The inspection involved 26 inspector-hours on site by one NRC regional based inspecto Results:

No items of noncompliance were identified.

Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)

'l 811 1 0 0 lo?-

• DETAILS Persons Contacted

• Mr. E. Barradale, Project Construction Manager

• Mr. R. Burricelli, Asst. Project Manager

• Mr. S. Chawaga, Principal Staff Engineer QAD

• Mr. Y. Contractor, Site QA Engineer Mr. J. Cox, Senior Construction Engineer Mr. S. Gerstein, Startup Support Engineer

• Mr. R. Griffith Sr., Senior Staff Engineer QA

• Mr. C. Johnson, Startup Engineer

• Mr. H. Lowe, Site QA Engineer

• Mr. D. McLaughlin, Senior Construction Engineer

• Mr. A. Meyer, Site QA Engineer

• Mr. G. Owen, Principal Construction Engineer

• Mr. R. Stanley, Lead Mechanical Field Engineer

• Mr. P. String, QA/AC Coordinator Mr. D. Tauber, Site QA Engineer Mr. G. Traylor, Startup Engineer Mr. R. Weltman, Startup Engineer United Engineers and Constructors~ In *Mr. F. Albert, Asst. Lead Engineer Mr. N. Bender, Lead Test Engineer

• Mr. R. Phelps, Supt. Field QC USN RC

• Mr. W. Bateman, Reactor Inspector

• Mr. J. Durr, Reactor Inspector

• Mr. L. Norrholm Resident Reactor Inspector

• Mr. R. Paolino, Reactor Inspector

• Mr. A. Toth, Reactor Inspector

• denotes those present at the exit inter~ie.

Preoperational Test Program Preoperational Test Procedure Review The following procedures were reviewed for technical and administrative adequacy.

SUP 25B Rev. 0 Approved August 29, 197 Vital Heat Trace

• SUP 31. 18 Rev. 0 Approved August 29, 197 Emergency Power Operational Test -

28 Diesel Contro1s-Alarms-Auxi1iaries SUP 31. lC Rev. 0 Approved August 28, 197 Emergency Power Operational Test -

2C Diese1 Controls-Alarms-Auxi1iaries SUP 31. 2A Rev. 0 Approved August 28, 197 Emergency Power Operationa1 Test -

Initial 2A Diese1 Generator Operational Testing SUP 45 Rev. 0 Approved August 30, 197 Atmospheric Steam Dump Control SUP 46 Rev. 0 Approved August 30, 197 Condenser Steam Dump System-Cold DTP-30-LRT-l Rev. 0 Approved Ju1y 13, 197 Reactor Containment Type 8 Leakage Rate Test DTP-30-LRT-2 Rev. 0 Approved August 4, 197 Reactor Containment Type C Leakage Rate Test Each procedure was reviewed for the fo1lowing:

Management approva Appropriate committee review, Procedure format, Test objectives, Pertinent Prerequisites, Environmental conditions, Acceptance criteria, References, Initial conditions, Test objectives are met, Performance verification, Recording conduct of test, Restoration of system to normal after test, Eva1uation of test data, and, Quality control verification Findings:

The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and licensee commitment No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedure Preoperational Test Procedure Verification The following procedures were reviewed to verify that adequate testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commitments:

SUP 68 Rev. 0 Approved February 17, 1977 Compressed Air Syst_em

-

SUP 258 Rev. 0 Approved August 28, 1978 Vital Heat Trace SUP 31. 18 Rev. O Approved August 29, 1978 Emergency Power Operational Test -

28 Diesel Controls - Alarms - Auxiliaries SUP 31. lC Rev. 0 Approved August 28, 1978 Emergency Power Operational Test -

2C Diesel Controls - Alarms - Auxiliaries SUP 31.2A Rev. 0 Approved August 28, 1978 Emergency Power Operational Test -

Initial 2A Diesel Generator Operational Testin SUP 45 Rev. O Approved August 30, 1978 Atmospheric Steam Dump Control SUP 46 Rev. 0 Approved August 30, 1978 Condenser Steam Dump System - Cold The inspector verified that the licensee had a procedure written, reviewed, and approve Management approval was in accordance with established licensee procedures and test objectives were consistent with test title Findings:

No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim Preoperational Test Results Evalvation *

The following procedures were reviewed to ascertain whether uniform criteria are being applied for evaluating completed preoperational tests to assure their technical and administrative adequacy:

SUP 68 Rev. 0 Approved June 20, 1978 Compressed Air System SUP 10.l Rev. 0 Approved June 27, 1978 VCT Level and Makeup Control

• SUP 12 Rev. 0 Approved August 17, 1978 Residual Heat Removal System - Cold SUP 15. 1 Rev. 0 Approved Sept. 6, 1978 Safety Injection Sytem - Performance Test SUP 27. lA Rev. 0 Approved June 20, 1978 2A 28 voe System SUP 27.2A Rev. O Approved July 11, 1978 2a 125 VOC System SUP 27.28 Rev. 0 Approved July 11, 1978 28 125 voe System SUP 27.20 Rev. 0 Approved March 27, 1978 2A & 28 125 voe System (Interim)

SUP 27.3 Rev. 0 Approved July 11, 1978 No. 2 250 VOC System SUP 29 Rev. 0 Approved July 11, 1978 Energizing 4KV Group.& Vital Buses SUP 33 Rev. 0 Approved August 15, 1978 Condenser Air Removal SUP 40 Rev. 0 Approved July 25, 1978 Turbine Lubricating Oil System The inspector reviewed the test results, and verification of licensee evaluation of test results, by the following methods:

Review of all test changes, Review of all test deficiencies, Review of test summary and evaluation, Review of 11As-run 11 copy of test procedure, Review of QA inspection records, and, Verifying that the test results have been approved.

Findings No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.

Integrated Hot Functional Test Program HFT Status The major thrust of this inspection centered on preparations for the Integrated Hot Functional Tes The inspector discussed the following areas with the Startup Engineer and his staff:

Preparations for the integrated Hot Functional Test, Procedure status and approval, and, Prerequisites and references needed for HFT, such as:

(1) Operating Instructions, (OI),,

(2)

Startup Procedures (SUP),

(3)

Post Preoperational Testing Turnover (POTT), and, (4)

Cold hanger settings and hanger pin HFT Procedure Review The inspector reviewed the following draft copies of procedures in support of Hot Functional Testing:

SUP 50. 12 Com~onent Cooling System - Hot SUP 50. 14 Auxiliary Feed System Performance Test SUP 50. 16 Safety Injection System - Precritical Test

• Findings It was noted by the inspector that this was a preliminary review of the draft copies of these procedures, and that a detailed review will be made of the approved procedures on subsequent inspections. The inspector had not further questions at this tim.

• Pl ant Tour The inspector observed work activities in the Control Room the Turbine Building, the Auxiliary Building, and in Containmen In the Control Room the inspector interviewed control room operators and observed instrumentation and control panel The inspector also observed preparations being made for Integrated Hot Functional Testtng. No inadequacies were identifie...

• • *

Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on September 15, 1978, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensees senior site representatives (denoted in paragraph 1).

The findings were identified and unresolved items were discussed.