IR 05000311/1978050
| ML18078A825 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/1978 |
| From: | Caphton D, Mcnatt T, Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18078A824 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-311-78-50, NUDOCS 7902080031 | |
| Download: ML18078A825 (7) | |
Text
Report N U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
- Region I 50-311/78-50 Docket N License No. CPPR-53 Priority ------
Category _B_l ______ _
Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:
Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Inspection at:
Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection conducted:
December 11-14, 1978 Inspectors:
I 1 ?;'°Yvt~Vl~ +012...
H~ H. Nicholas, Reactor Inspector
~I~-~<' YV1~Y\\Q T. G. McNatt, Reactor Inspector Approved by:
upport Section Inspection Summary:
Inspection. on.December 11-14, 1978 (Report No. 50-311/78-50)
date signed date signed date signed 1~h/1ff" date ~igned Areas*Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by regional based inspectors of the overall preoperational test program including post hot functional test system and equipment status, preoperational test program implementation, test procedure review and verification, test results evaluation, operating instruc-tion review; followup on previous unresolved and open items; and plant tour of containment, auxiliary building, turbine building and control roo The inspection involved 66 inspector hours on site by two NRC regional based inspector Results:
No items of noncompliance were identifie Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
7902osoo3'
c---
DETAILS Persons Contacte Public Service Electric and Gas Company
- Mr. S. Chawaga, Principal Staff Engineer - QA Mr. J. Cox; Senior Construction Engineer - Startup Mr. R. Griffith,.-Jr., Senior Staff Engineer - QA Mr. H. Howe, Site QA Engineer Mr. C. Johnson, Start~p Engineer Mr. W. Kittle, Site QA Engineer Mr. R. Klosek, Test Engineer
- Mr. A. Meyer, Site QA Engineer
- Mr. E. Meyer, Site QA Head Mr. E. Pearce, Test Engineer Mr. B. Rodimer, Test Engineer Mr. D. Tauber, QC Test and Startup Mr. G. Traylor, Test Engineer United Engineers and Constructors, In M K~ Kephart, Assistant Test Engineer
- Mr.. R. Phelps, Superintendent Field QC
- Mr. D. Snyder, Project Engineer
- denotes those present at the exit intervie.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Finding~
(Open) Unresolved Item (311/78-01-02):
SUP 68 switching sequence of air compressors. This item has been resolved by the addition of startup procedure SUP 6C which addresses the air compressor sequencin This procedure will be reviewed at a subsequent inspectio (Open) Unresolved Item (311/78-12-10):
The ability to supply emergency lighting to the control room, shutdown station outside of control room, emergency generator rooms and battery room This item is being addressed in a new procedure and will be in-corporated into the test progra This procedure will be reviewed when* approved and received *at a subsequent inspection.
- 3 Preoperational Test Program Status of Preoperational Test Program The inspector submitted to the startup engineer a list of startup procedures that have*not been received as yet for revie Tests to be completed, and specific tests that the NRC inspectors wish to witness, were discussed wtth the startup enginee Post Hot Functional Test-System and Equipment Status Discussions were held with the startup engineer, concerning the status of systems and equipment, and tests included in the integrated hot functional test progra The* inspectors were *
made aware of exceptions and deletions that were made during hot funttional testing. The exceptions and/or deletions will*
b~ completed during 1ater testin The inspectors will follow-up on these itemi during subsequent inspections, during test
_witnessing, and during procedure results reviews;_ Preoperational Test Program Implementation In the area of training, the inspectors selected and examined records of test pers6nnel for qualifications and training receive The examination included review of training records and direct interview of test personnel to verify they had received the required training. The training included:
Administrative controls for testing, QA/QC indoctrination, and, Appropriate technical trainin No discrepancies were noted in this examinatio In the area of test and measurement equipment, the inspectors selected the following four items of test and measurement equipmen *
--
Hiese gage, range 0-2000 PSl serial *number LAB-40 ca:l i bra ted November 3, 1978.
- Volt-ohmmeter, model 260-6P serial number VETC-47 calibrated October 31, 1978 Vibration analyzer IRD model 308 serial Al843176737 pickup 544 serial D398H248 calibrated February 22, 1978 Vibration analyzer IRD model 350 serial F75119830 pickup 544 serial D734A2l51S calibrated December l, 1978 The inspectors reviewed the calibration records and verified th~t the administrative controls had been implemente No discrepancies were noted and the inspectors had no further questions in this are d. * Test.Procedure Review and Verification The following procedures were reviewed for technical and administrative adequacy, and to verify that adequate testing is planned. to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commit-ments:
SUP 39~ Rev. 0, Approved November 27, 197 Moi~ture Separator Reheater System SUP 19.l, Rev. 1, Approved October 26, 197 Auxiliary Building Ventilation SUP 19.4, Rev. 0, Approved November 3, 197 Reactor Nozzle Support Vent System SUP 35, Rev. 0, Approved November 1, 197 Steam Generator Feed Pump Initial Run SUP 34, Rev. 0, Approved December 4, 197 Circula-ting Water System and Sodium Hypochlorite System.-
-*
SUP 20.l, Rev. 0, Approved November 22, 197 Reactor Protection - Emergency Safeguards Time Response Measure-ment
Inspector review determined the abbve procedures to be con-sistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and licensee commitments. *
No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedure Test Results Evaluation The following procedures were reviewed to ascertain whether uniform cttteria are being applied for evaluating completed preoperational tests to assure their technical and administra-tive adequacy:
SUP 18.2, Rev. 0, Approved December 4, 197 Penetra-tion Cooling System SUP 50.17, Rev. 0, Approved December 4, 197 Safety Injection *system - Check Valves Leakage.Test SUP 8, Rev. 0, Approved November 27, 197 Pressurizer Relief Tank
SUP 43, Rev. 0, Approved June 20, 197 Energizing SOOKV Switchyard (Completion)
SUP 13, Rev. O,.Approved.October 26, 197 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling System The inspector reviewed the test results, and verification of licensee evaluation of test results, by the following methods:
Review of all test changes, Review of all test deficiencies, Review of test summary and evaluation,
- ..-'-:. ***-~-
Review of 11As.:.run 11 copy *of test procedures, Review of QA inspection records, and, Verifying that the test results have been approved.,
No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim Operating Instructions (Ois) Supporting Testing Operating instructions are used for performance of equipment operations,to establish prerequisites, and a~ references for testing. The following OI 1 s were received and reviewed by the inspector:
II-4.3.4, Rev. 0, November 24, 197 Filling and Charging Accumulators II-4.3.5, Rev. 0, November 21, 197 Flushing and Draining the Boron Injection Tank II-8.3.6, Rev. 0, November 20, 1978. Spent Fuel Pit Demineralizer - Resin Remova III-1.3.7, Rev. 0, November 20, 197 Turbine Auto-matic Trip Mechanisms Operational Tests No discrepancies were noted and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Plant Tour Tours were made of the containment, auxiliary building, turbine building, and the control roo Operators were que~tioned, plant conditions were discussed, and control room logs were examine The inspectors observ~d preparations being made for the structural integrity test (SIT) and the containment integrated leak rate test (CtLRT).
The inspectors also noted the aggressive housekeeping and cleanliness effort in progres * *
No discrepancies were identified.
- -'
.
_,,..
- *
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on December 14, 1978, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's senior site repre-sentatives (denoted in Paragraph 1). The findings were identified and previous unresolved items were discussed.