IR 05000311/1978036
| ML18078A379 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 10/04/1978 |
| From: | Caphton D, Mcnatt T, Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18078A378 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-311-78-36, NUDOCS 7811140043 | |
| Download: ML18078A379 (7) | |
Text
Report N Docket N U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 50-311/78-36 50-311
Region I License No. CPPR-53 Priority -------
Bl Category -------
Licensee:
Public Service Electric & Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:
Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Inspection at:
Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection conducted: September 27 and 28, 1978 Inspectors:
.-j./. ~.
Approved H. Nicholas, Reactor Inspector t-mM~Q T. McNatt, Reactor Inspector Caphton, Chief, Nuclear Support Section 1, RO&NS Branch Inspection Summary:
7?
1.0- 3-78 date signed date signed lo/J / 73
?date signed Inspettion on September 27 and 28, 1978 (Report No. 50-311/78-36)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection by regional basedinspectors of the integrated hot functional test program status; preoperational test pro-cedures for review, verification and witnessing; followup on previous unresolved and open items; and pl ant tour of the control* room, turbine building, auxiliary building, penetration building, fuel handling areas, diesel generator room and containmen The inspection involved 29 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC regional based inspector Results:
No items of noncompliance were identifie <'.'.Jl/3 Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Public Service Electric and Gas Company
- Mr. S. Chawaga, Principal Staff Engineer - QAD Mr. J. Cic~one, Senior Constructirin Engineer
- Mr. C. Johnson, Startup Engineer
- Mr. A. Meyer, Site QA Engineer
- Mr. E. Meyer, Project QA Head
- Mr. D. Mclaughlin, Senior Construction Engineer
- Mr. P. String, Jr., QA/QC Coordinator Mr. G. Traylor, Startup Test Engineer United Engineers and Constructors, In Mr. J. Blair, QC Engineer Mr. S. Page, Lead Test Engineer
- Mr. R. Phelps, Superintendent Field QC USN RC
- Mr. L. Norrholm, Resident Reactor Inspector*
- denotes those present at the exit intervie.
Preoperational Test Procedures Preoperational Test Procedure Review The following procedure was reviewed for technical and admin-istrative adequacy:
SUP 30, Revision 0, Approved September 21, 197 Ener-gizing No. 2 Generator Main Bus and Associated Equipmen The procedure was reviewed for the following:
Management approval; Appropriate committee review; Procedure format;
Test objectives; Prerequisites; Environmental conditions; Acceptance criteria; References; Initial conditions; Test objectives are met; Performance verification; Recording conduct of test; Restoration of system to normal after test; Evaluation of test data; and, Quality control verificatio Findings:
The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedure that it is consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and\\
licensee commitment No discrepancies were noted in the re-view of this procedur Preoperational Test Procedure Verification The following procedure was reviewed to verify that adequate testing is *planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commitments :
SUP 30, Revision 0, Approved September 21, 197 Energiz-ing No~ 2 Generator Main Bus and Associated Equipmen The inspector verified that the licensee had a procedure writ-ten, reviewed, and approve Management approval was in accord-ance with established licensee procedures and test objectives were consistent with test titles.
j
- Findi_ngs:
No discrepancies were noted in the review of _this procedure and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Integrated Hot Functional Test Program Hot Functional Test Status The primary objective of this inspection was to review and ob-serve preparations for the Integrated Hot Functional Test. The inspector received and reviewed procedures and discussed the following areas with the Startup Engineer:
Preparations for the Integrated Hot Functional Test; Procedure status and approval; Prerequisites and references; Procedure verification and results review; and, Test witnessin HFT Procedure Review The following procedures were reviewed for technical and admin-istrative a*dequacy:
SUP 50.06, Revision 0, Approved September 26, 197 Pres-surizer Pressure and Level Contro SUP 50.08, Revision 0, Approved September 26, 197 Steam Generator Safety Valve Tes SUP 50.16, Revision 0, Approved September 27, 197 Safety Injection System Precritical Tes Each procedure was reviewed for the fa 11 owi_ng:
Management approval; Appropriate committee review; Procedure format;
- I
- Test objectives; Prerequisites; Environmental conditions; Acceptance criteria; References; Initial conditions; Test objectives are met; Performance verification; Recording conduct ~f test; Restoration of system to normal after test; Evaluation of test data; and, Quality control verificatio Findings:
The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements, guid-ance and licensee commitments. * No discrepancies were *noted in the review of these procedure HFT Procedure Verification The following procedures were reviewed to verify that adequate testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commitments:
SUP 50.01, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 1978. Reactor Coolant System Thermal Expansio SUP 50.02, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 1978. Reactor Coolant System Leakage Test-Ho. '
SUP 50.03, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Pressurizer Power Operated Relief Valve Tes SUP 50.05, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Incore Thermocouple RTD Cross Calibratio SUP 50.06, Revision 0, Approved September 26, 197 Pressurizer Pressure and Level Contro SUP 50.08, Revision 0, Approved September 26, 197 Steam Generator Safety Valve Tes SUP 50.09A, Revision 0, Approved September 11, 197 Atmospheric Steam Dump Control-Ho SUP 50.16, Revision 0, Approved September 27, 197 Safety Injection System Precritical Tes The inspector verified that the licensee had a procedure written, reviewed, and approve Management approval was in accordance with established licensee procedures and test objectives were consistent with test title Findi_ngs:
No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Fuel Handling Areas An inspection was conducted of the following areas:
Fuel Receiving Area; Decon Area; Fuel Handling Area Control Center;
--
Fuel Storage Area; Fuel Transfer Pit; Spent Fuel Pit; and, Fuel Skimmer, Filter-Pump Area.
The inspector*observed preparations being made for receipt of new fuel and work in progress of modificatfons being made to spent fuel rack *
Findings:
Housekeeping cleanliness was in progress in all areas in prepara-tion for receiving new fuel. Receipt of new fuel is scheduled for October 15, 1978 through January, 197 No discrepancies were noted and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Plant Tour The inspectors toured the control room, turbine building, auxiliary building, penetration building, fuel handling areas, diesel genera-tor room and containmen The inspectors observed work activities in all areas and preparations being made for the integrated hot functional tes No inadequacies* were identified. * Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on September 28,. 1978, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's senior site representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1). The findings were iden-tified and previous unresolved items were discussed.