IR 05000311/1978038
| ML18078A476 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1978 |
| From: | Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18078A475 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-311-78-38, NUDOCS 7812060355 | |
| Download: ML18078A476 (7) | |
Text
Report N Docket N U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 50-311/78-38 50-311
Region I License N CPPR-53 Priority -------
Category -------
Bl Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:
Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Inspection at: Hancocks Bridge, New*Jersey Inspection conducted:
Octo~7r* 10-1.2, 1978 Inspectors: 1/.~~~*
A. NlCOaS, Reactor Inspector Approved by:
uc ear upport Section No. 1,
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on October 10-12, 1978 (Report No. 50-311/78-38)
date signed date signed
/ofa~/7/)
tlate signed Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by a regional based inspector of the preoperational test program implementation; integrated hot functional test program status; preoperational test procedure review and verification; followup on previous unresolved and open items; and plant tour of the fuel handling areas, diesel generator areas, containment, auxiliary building, serv~ce water and cir~ulating water structure The inspection involved 24 inspector-hours on site by one NRC regional based inspecto Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
- DETAILS Persons Contacted Public Service Electric and Gas Company
- Mr. S. Chawaga, Principal Staff Engineer - QAD Mr. H. Florey, Startup Test Engineer Mr. R. Griffith, Jr., Senior Staff Engineer - QA
- Mr. C. Johnson, Startup Engineer Mr. A. Meyer, Site QA Engineer
- Mr. E. Meyer, Project QA Head
- Mr. P. String, Jr., QA-QC Coordinator
- Mr. D. Tauber, Site QA Engineer United Engineers and Constructors, In *Mr. S. Page, Lead Test Engineer
- Mr. R. Phelps, Supt. Field QC
- Mr. D. Snyder, Project Engineer
- Mr. E. Walsh, Asst. Supt. Field QC USN RC
- Mr. L. Norrholm, Resident Reactor Inspector
- denotes those present at the exit intervie.
Preoperational Test Program Implementation The inspector reviewed and verified the implementation of document control, design changes and modifications developed by the licensee to support the FSAR commitments and Regulatory requirement Test Program Discussions with the Startup Engineer, who directs the licensee's test program, verified that he was familiar with the test program status and is involved in the day by day planning and long range pro-grams to test the various systems,necessary to *support the initial fuel loadin The major milestone 11Hot Functional Testing" is tenta-tively scheduled to commence Ori October 27' _197.
The inspector had no further questions on the test program at this tim.
Preoperational Test Procedures Preoperational Test Procedure Review The following procedures were reviewed for technical and administrative adequacy:
SUP 16.l, Revision 0, Approved October 3, 1978 Liquid Waste Receipt and Storage SUP 17.2A, Revision 0, Approved October 3, 1978 Indexi_ng of Westinghouse Spent Fuel Racks SUP 19.3, Revision 1, Approved October 8, 1978 Rod Drive Ventilation System SUP 19.5, Revision 0, Approved September 29, 1978 Reactor Shield Vent Fan System SUP 19.8, Revision 0, Approved September 29, 1978 Fuel Handling Ventilation System
. The procedures were reviewed for the f o 11 owing:
- Management approval,
Appropriate corrrrnittee review,
--
Procedure format, Test objectives, Prerequisites, Environmental conditions, Acceptance criteria, References,
Initial conditions, Test objectives are met, Performance verification, Recording conduct of test, Restoration of system to normal after test, Evaluation of test data, and, *
Quality control verification.
Findings:
The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and licensee corrnnitrnent No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedure Preoperational Test Procedure Verification The following procedures were reviewed to verify that adequate testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commitments:
SUP 17.2A, Revision 0, Approved October 3, 1978 Indexing of Westinghouse Spent Fuel Racks SUP 19.3, Revision l, Approved October 8, 1978 Rod Drive Ventilation System SUP 19.5, Revision 0, Approved September 29, 1978 Reactor Shield Vent Fan System SUP 19.8, Revision 0, Approved Systember 29, 1978 Fuel Handling Ventilation System The inspector verified that the licensee had a procedure written, reviewed and approve Management approval was in accordance with established licensee procedures and test objectives were consistent with test title Findings:
No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Integrated Hot Functional Test Program Hot Functional Test. Status The primary objective of this inspection was the cont_inued review and observance of preparations for the Integrated Hot Functional Tes The inspector received and reviewed procedures and dis-cussed the following areas with the Startup E.ngineer:
Preparations for the Hot Functional Test, Prerequisites and references, Procedure status and approval, Procedure verification and results review, and, Test witnessin HFT Procedure Review The following procedures were reviewed for technical and admin-istrative adequacy:
SUP 50.098, Revision 0, Approved October 8, 1978 Condenser Steam Dump System - Hot SUP 50. 14, Revision 0, Approved September 29, 1978 Auxiliary Feed Pump Performance SUP 50.15, Revision 0, Approved September 28, 1978 Control Room Inaccessibility
SUP 50.17, Revision 0, Approved October 8, 1978 Safety Injection System Check Valves - Leakage Test Each procedure was reviewed for the following:
Management approval, Appropriate committee review, Procedure format, Test objectives, Prerequisites, Envjronmental conditions,.
Acceptance criteria, References, Initial conditions, Test objectives are met, Performance verification, Recording conduct of test, Restoration of system to normal after test, Evaluation of test data, and, Quality control verificatio Findings:
The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and licensee commitment No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedure *
6 HFT Procedure Verification The following procedures were reviewed to verify that adequate testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee corrmitments:
SUP 50.098, Revision 0, Approved October 8, 1978 Condenser Steam Dump System - Hot SUP 50.14, Revision 0, Approved September 29, 1978 Auxiliary Feed Pump Performance SUP 50.15, Revision 0, Approved September 28, 1978 Control Room Inaccessibility SUP 50.17, Revision 0, Approved October 8, 1978 Safety Injection System Check Valves - Leakage Test The inspector verified that the licensee had a procedure written, Reviewed and approve Management approval was in accordance with established licensee procedures and test objectives were consistent with test title '
Findings:
No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim Preliminary Test Procedure Review The inspector received and reviewed the following draft copies of procedures in support of Hot Functional Testing and.Containment Leak Rate Testing:
SUP 50.05, draft copy Primary Sampling System SUP 50.13, draft copy
- Initial Turbine Ro.11 - Pump Heat SUP 50.18, draft copy Reactor Cooling Pump Motor Starting Test DTP-30,:.LRT-3 Reactor Containment Tyj:E A Leakage Rate Test
- I
Findings:
It was noted by the inspector that this was a preliminary review of the draft copies of these procedures~ and that a detailed review will be made of the approved procedures on subsequent inspection The inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Fuel Handling Areas An inspection was conducted in the following fuel handling areas:
New Fuel Storage Area, Fuel Transfer Pool, Spent Fuel Pit, and, Decon Roo The inspectors observed preparations being made for the indexing of the Westinghouse spent fuel racks and preparations for receiving new fue Receipt of new fuel is now scheduled for October 19, 1978, through January 197 *
Findings:
No discrepancies were noted and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Plant Tour At the conclusion of the site inspection on October 12, 1978, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's senibr site re~resentatives (denoted in paragraph 1). The findings were identified and previous unresolved items were discussed.