IR 05000311/1978037
| ML18078A553 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1978 |
| From: | Caphton D, Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18078A551 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-311-78-37, NUDOCS 7812290044 | |
| Download: ML18078A553 (8) | |
Text
u.s~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I*
Report N /78-37 Docket No. __
5_o_-3_1_1 __ _
License N CPPR-53 Priority -------
Category.....__8_1 ____ _
Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80. Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:
Salem Nuc.lear Generating Station, Unit 2 Inspection at:
. Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey*
Inspection conducted:
October 25-27; 1978 Inspectors:
D. L. Caphton, Section Chief date signed Approved by:
dat-igned II~~ o/
' (daSigned upport Section.*
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on October 25-27 1978 (Re ort No. 50-311 78-37 Areas Inspecte : Rout1ne, unannounce-inspection by a regional based inspector of the overall preoperational test program including test program implementation, integrated hot functional test program.status, test procedure review and verif-
. ication; witnessing of diesel generator testing;-followup on previous unresolved and open items; and plant tour of the diesel ~enerator areas, penetration build-ing, auxiliary building and containmen The inspection involved 24 inspector-
- hours onsite by one NRC regional based inspector, and 10.5 supervisory-hours by one NRC superviso *
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
78122900~~
Region I Fann 12 (Rev. April 77)
- DETAILS Persons Contacted Public Service EleGttic and Gas Company
- Mr. s. Chawaga,. Principal Staff.Engineer - QAO
- Mr. J. Cox,* Senior Construction Engineer - Startup
- Mr. F. Diaferio, Jr., Group Head*- QC Test and Startup
- Mr. R. Griffith, Jr., Senior*Staff.~ngineer - QA
- Mr. C. Johnson, Startup Engineer
- Mr~ A. Meyer, Site QA Eng.ineer
- Mr. E *. Meyer, Site QA Engineer
- Mr. P. String, Jr., QA-QC Coordinator
. Mr. D. Tauber, Site QA Engineer United Engineers and Constructors, In * Mr. R. Mccoppin, Lead Electrical Test
- Mr. R. Phelps, Supt. Field QC
. *Mr. D. Snyder, Project Engineer
- Mr. E. Walsh, Asst. Supt. Field QC Westinghouse Electric Corporation Mr. N. Starich, Mechanical Engineer USN RC Engineer
- M ~. Norrholm, Resident Reactor Inspector
- denotes those present at the exit intervie.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed)
Inspector Followup Item (311/77-25-02): Development of operating procedures for Unit 2 prior to Hot Functional Testin The licensee has developed approved operating instructions to sup-port the Integrated Hot Functional Test Progra *
(Open).* Unresolved Item (311/78~01-02): SUP 68 switching sequence of air compressors.. * This item has been resolved by the addition of Startup Procedure SUP 6C which addresses the air compressor se-quencin The procedure is in final review and will be examined on a subsequent inspectio *
(Open)
Unresolved Item (311/78-12-10): The ability to supply emerg-
. ency lighting to contra l room, sh.utdown stat ion outside of contra l room, and e*mergency generator rooms.. This item will be incorporated into the test program and will be addressed in a forthcoming proced-ure.. The inspector will followup on this item at subsequent inspec-tions.* Preoperational Test: Program Preoperational Test Program Implementation The inspector discussed with the startup engineer, the imple-
. mentation of plant maintenance during preoperational testin Areas discussed were plant maintenance,- preventive maintenance program and maintenance record The inspector reviewed docu-me.nts and procedures and.will examine this area in detail at subsequent inspection The inspector had no further questions on plant maintenance at this tim b. - Hot Functional Test Programs The objective of this inspection was the continued review and observance of preparations for the Int.egrated Hot Functional Tes The inspector received and reviewed procedures and dis-cussed the following areas with the Startup Engineer:
- Preparati ans for the Hot Functional Test; Prerequisites and references; Inspection teams and briefings; Plant and System status; Procedure status and approval ;
Procedure verification and results review; Test witnessing; and, Hot Functional Test organizatio All areas of concern to the inspector were discussed with the Startup Engineer and the inspector had no further questions at this tim Operating*lnstructions Supporting HFT Operating Instructions (OI's) are prerequisites to the HFT procedure and are used for performance to establish prerequisites, and as reference The following OI's were received and reviewed by the inspector:
II-7.3.2 Revision 0, Approved May 11, 197 Component Cooling System - Normal Operatio II-6.3.2 Revision O, Approved May l, 197 Initiating Residual Heat Remova II-3.3.3 Revision 0, Approved May 2, 197 Excess Let-down Flo I-3.l Revision 0, Approved July 12, 197 Refueling to Cold Shutdow II-1.3.2 Revis1on 0, Approved July 12, 197 Operation of Metal Impact Monitoring Syste II-1.3.6 Revision O, Approved July 12, 197 Draining the Reactor Coolant Syste II-2.3. l Revision 0, Approved July 12, 197 Purging the Pressurizer Relief Tank of Oxyge II-2.3.2 Revision 0, Approved July 12, 197 Purging the Pressurizer Relief Tank of Hydroge II-2.3.4 Revision 0, Approved July 12, 197 Pressurizer Overpressure Protection - Operability Check of PRl and PR2.
d *
II-3.3.8 Revision 0, Approved July 12, 197 Rapid Boratio I-3.5 Revision 0, Approved July 17, 197 Minimum Load to Hot Standb II-l.3.6 Revision 0, Approved July 17, 197 Boron Con-centration Contro III-1.3.2 Revision 0, Approved August 3, 1978. Turbine Overspeed Tes III-1.3.3 Revision 0, Approved August 3, 1978. Turbine Valve Tes III-3.3.3 Revision 0, Approved August 3, 197 Main Turbine Lubricating Oil - Loss of Oil Pressur Test Procedure Review and Verification The following procedures were reviewed fer technical and admin-istrative adequaGy, and to verify that adequate testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licens*ee commitment SUP 25A Revision 0, Approved October 11, 197 Non-Vital
- Heat Traci_ng System *
SUP 19.6 Revision 0, Approved October 10, 1978. Control Area Air Conditioning Syste SUP 20.S Revision 0, Approved October 13, 1978. Reactor Plant Systems Setpoint Verificatio SUP 19.3 Revision 1, Approved October 8, 197 Rod Drive Ventilation Syste SUP 50.11 Revision 0, Approved October 8, 197 Chemical and Volume Control System - Ho The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and licensee commitment No discrepancies were noted in the re-view of these procedures.
-
_ _____J
- 6 Preliminary Test Procedure Review The inspector received and reviewed the following draft copies of procedures in support of Hot Functional Tes~ing:
SUP 50.10 (Draft Copy).
Steam Generator Drains and Slow-down - Ho SUP 50.19 (Draft Copy).
Preservice Examination of Sup-port This was a preliminary review of these procedures. A detailed review will be made of the approved procedures on a subsequent inspectio The inspector had no further questions at this tim * Test Results Evaluation The following procedures were reviewed to ascertain whether uni-form criteria are being applied for evaluating completed preop- *
erational tests to assure their technical and administrative adequacy:
SUP 31.3 Revision 0, Approved September 8, 1978. Diesel Fuel Oil Storage and Transfer Syste SUP 27. 2C Revis ion 0, Approved Apri 1 3, 197 C 125 VDC Syste SUP 15.1 Revision 0, Approved February 9, 1978. Safety Injection Performance Test Deficiency Report S-0022 Accepted and Verified October 6, 197 The inspector reviewed the test results, and verification of 1 i censee eva 1 ua ti on of test results, by the fa 11 owing methods :
Review of all test changes; Review of all test deficiencies; Review of test summary and evaluation;
...
Review of 11As-run 11 copy of test procedure; Review of QA *inspection records; and, Verifying that the test results have been approve No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this time *
. Vibration Assessment Program The inspector met and discussed with the Westinghouse represen-tative the vibration assessment program, the hot functional test phase covering the reactor pressure vessel, the reactor coolant pumps and the loose parts monitoring syste The *
inspector will followup on this segment of the vibration assessment program by observation and witnessing during the Int.egrated Hot Functional Tes *
- Test Witnessing The inspector observed preparations and witnessed operational testing of Diesel Generator 2 The inspector witnessed air starts of the diesel generator from the two air receivers without benefit of th air compressor The deisel generator made 17 successful air starts on the air volume in the two air receivers. The crankshaft deflec-tion and vibration checks were all within toleranc No discrepancies were noted and the inspector had no further ques-tions at this tim.
Plant Tour The inspectors toured containment where preparations for the Inte-grated Hot Functional Test were being made; the diesel generator
- rooms where work was in progress for the diesel generator opera-tional tests, auxilairy building, penetration building, and fuel handling area The inspector* observed work activities in all areas and htiusekeeping and cleanliness in progres ' '
'
No discrepancies were identifie.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on October 27, 1978, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's senior site repre-sentatives* {denoted in Paragraph 1). The findings were identified and previous unresolved items were discussed. *