ML20247J697: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20247J697
| number = ML20247J697
| issue date = 07/21/1989
| issue date = 07/21/1989
| title = Ack Receipt of 890518 Response to NRC 890317 Ltr Re Allegation RIII-88-A-0162 Pertaining to fitness-for-duty Issue at Plant.Investigation Found to Be Sufficient to Support Conclusions
| title = Ack Receipt of 890518 Response to NRC Re Allegation RIII-88-A-0162 Pertaining to fitness-for-duty Issue at Plant.Investigation Found to Be Sufficient to Support Conclusions
| author name = Norelius C
| author name = Norelius C
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Line 20: Line 20:
3 0 .e E    -
3 0 .e E    -
JUL 211989 Docket No. 50-295 Docket No. 50-304 Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed Senior Vice President Post Office Box 767                                                                                                            l Chicago, IL 60690 Gentlemen:
JUL 211989 Docket No. 50-295 Docket No. 50-304 Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed Senior Vice President Post Office Box 767                                                                                                            l Chicago, IL 60690 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your {{letter dated|date=May 18, 1989|text=letter dated May 18, 1989}}, in response to our March 17, 1989, letter concerning allegations pertaining to a fitness for duty issue at Zion station (Allegation RIII-88-A-0162).
Thank you for your {{letter dated|date=May 18, 1989|text=letter dated May 18, 1989}}, in response to our {{letter dated|date=March 17, 1989|text=March 17, 1989, letter}} concerning allegations pertaining to a fitness for duty issue at Zion station (Allegation RIII-88-A-0162).
In our letter, we requested that you conduct a review and followup on the allegation and submit the results of your investigation to the NRC.
In our letter, we requested that you conduct a review and followup on the allegation and submit the results of your investigation to the NRC.
Your reply stated that the current company policy does not specifically prohibit the use of alcohol while on urs-paid meal periods but does strongly discourage it. Your guard force and company managers have been trained to identify on-site effects of alcohol consumption. Your response showed that the system worked when a contractor supervisor identified an individual smelling of alcohol and contacted your security personnel. The individual was escorted offsite and later terminated. Your review o the individual's work showed that the safety of the plant was not diminished. A second incident mentioned in your response had been previously reviewed by us and no significant safety or fitness for duty concerns were identified. Your review could not substantiate that certain indicated plant and contractor employees drink to excess each night and return to work.
Your reply stated that the current company policy does not specifically prohibit the use of alcohol while on urs-paid meal periods but does strongly discourage it. Your guard force and company managers have been trained to identify on-site effects of alcohol consumption. Your response showed that the system worked when a contractor supervisor identified an individual smelling of alcohol and contacted your security personnel. The individual was escorted offsite and later terminated. Your review o the individual's work showed that the safety of the plant was not diminished. A second incident mentioned in your response had been previously reviewed by us and no significant safety or fitness for duty concerns were identified. Your review could not substantiate that certain indicated plant and contractor employees drink to excess each night and return to work.

Latest revision as of 14:34, 16 March 2021

Ack Receipt of 890518 Response to NRC Re Allegation RIII-88-A-0162 Pertaining to fitness-for-duty Issue at Plant.Investigation Found to Be Sufficient to Support Conclusions
ML20247J697
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 07/21/1989
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20247J701 List:
References
NUDOCS 8907310296
Download: ML20247J697 (2)


Text

- - . _

3 0 .e E -

JUL 211989 Docket No. 50-295 Docket No. 50-304 Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed Senior Vice President Post Office Box 767 l Chicago, IL 60690 Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter dated May 18, 1989, in response to our March 17, 1989, letter concerning allegations pertaining to a fitness for duty issue at Zion station (Allegation RIII-88-A-0162).

In our letter, we requested that you conduct a review and followup on the allegation and submit the results of your investigation to the NRC.

Your reply stated that the current company policy does not specifically prohibit the use of alcohol while on urs-paid meal periods but does strongly discourage it. Your guard force and company managers have been trained to identify on-site effects of alcohol consumption. Your response showed that the system worked when a contractor supervisor identified an individual smelling of alcohol and contacted your security personnel. The individual was escorted offsite and later terminated. Your review o the individual's work showed that the safety of the plant was not diminished. A second incident mentioned in your response had been previously reviewed by us and no significant safety or fitness for duty concerns were identified. Your review could not substantiate that certain indicated plant and contractor employees drink to excess each night and return to work.

We found your investigation to be sufficient to support your conclusions and have no additional questions regarding this matter. We request that you retain the supporting documentation for your investigation of this allegation for a minimum of one year from the date of this letter.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of tne Commission's regulations, a copy of j this lettar will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Your cooperation is appreciated.

Sincerely, 1

l Charles E. Norelius, Director )

890731o;h$[Ohj gDR ADO ,g Division of Radiation Safety l ppc and Safeguards [/ .

% i See Attached Distribution l 1,, ENCLOSURE CONTAINS i RIII  % RII RIII IRIII RIII 20crF2. 7Do IEF01110. TION ]

Chris off cg C eed G eger .N us 0 7l2) 1 2 ,

,n f -

Commonwealth Edison Company 2 JUL 211989 Distribution cc: T. J. Maiman, Vice President, PWR Operations T. Kovach, Nuclear Licensing Manager T. Joyce, Station Manager ,

Chandu Patel, Project i Manager, NRR cc w/ltr dtd 5/18/89, l w/ enclosure, 10 CFR 2.790 INFORMATION:

NRR/DRIS/SGB NRR/DRIS/ SIB NRR/DLPQ/PEB cc w/ltr dtd 5/18/89, w/o enclosure:

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Richard Hubbard J. W. McCaffrey, Chief. Public Utilities Division Mayor, City of Zion bcc: C. Weil, RIII cocim m:m .y%x #luon n ., a W JU 0 .

FACE IU '," # ^"gLLLD

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _