ML14156A221: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/04/2014
| issue date = 06/04/2014
| title = Public Meeting Summary - Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251
| title = Public Meeting Summary - Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251
| author name = Sandal S R
| author name = Sandal S
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
| addressee name = Rich D W
| addressee name = Rich D
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 June 4, 2014  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 June 4, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO:               Daniel W. Rich, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects FROM:                       Shane Sandal /RA/
 
Senior Project Engineer Reactor Projects Branch 3
MEMORANDUM TO: Daniel W. Rich, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects FROM:   Shane Sandal
/RA/ Senior Project Engineer Reactor Projects Branch 3  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 24: Line 22:


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
  - TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND 50-251 On May 21, 2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff met with members of the public concerning the annual assessment of Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of the meeting was to provide opportunities to discuss the annual assessment of Turkey Point with the public for the period of January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. Enclosed is a list of attendees and the Turkey Point annual assessment meeting presentation.  
  - TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND 50-251 On May 21, 2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff met with members of the public concerning the annual assessment of Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of the meeting was to provide opportunities to discuss the annual assessment of Turkey Point with the public for the period of January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. Enclosed is a list of attendees and the Turkey Point annual assessment meeting presentation.
The following Region 2 and Headquarters NRC staff attended the public meeting:
Mark Lesser, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects Daniel Rich, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 3, Division of Reactor Projects Tim Hoeg, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point Audrey Klett, Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Marlen Rodriguez, Site Administrative Assistant, Turkey Point Docket Nos.: 50-250 and 50-251 License No.: DPR-31, DPR-41


The following Region 2 and Headquarters NRC staff attended the public meeting:  
==Enclosures:==
 
: 1. List of Attendees
Mark Lesser, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects Daniel Rich, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 3, Division of Reactor Projects Tim Hoeg, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point Audrey Klett, Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Marlen Rodriguez, Site Administrative Assistant, Turkey Point
: 2. Meeting Presentation


Docket Nos.50-250 and 50-251 License No.:  DPR-31, DPR-41
_________________________                SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE  FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE            RII:DRP      RII:DRP SIGNATURE        SRS5 /RA/    DWR1 /RA/
NAME              SSandal      DRich DATE                  6/4/2014    6/4/2014 E-MAIL COPY?        YES    NO YES      NO      YES  NO    YES      NO    YES    NO    YES    NO    YES  NO Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Annual Assessment Meeting 2013 Performance Assessment Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region 2 Enclosure 2


==Enclosures:==
NRC Organization
: 1. List of Attendees
* 5 member Commission led by the Chairman
: 2. Meeting Presentation 
* Commissioners serve five-year terms
* ~4000 employees with ~$1 billion budget
* Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland
* Four regional offices:
Region I, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Region II, Atlanta, Georgia Region III, Lisle, Illinois Region IV, Arlington, Texas Enclosure 2


_________________________  SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE  FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP      SIGNATURE SRS5  /RA/ DWR1 /RA/      NAME SSandal DRich      DATE 6/4/2014 6/4/2014      E-MAIL COPY?    YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO Enclosure 1 Enclosure 2 Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Annual Assessment Meeting2013 Performance AssessmentNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region 2
NRC Strategic Plan Goals
* Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment
* Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 NRC Organization*5 member Commission led by the Chairman*Commissioners serve five-year terms
Our Mission To license and regulate the nations civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.
*~4000 employees with ~$1 billion budget
Enclosure 2
*Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland
*Four regional offices:Region I, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaRegion II, Atlanta, GeorgiaRegion III, Lisle, IllinoisRegion IV, Arlington, Texas


Enclosure 2 NRC Strategic Plan Goals*Safety-Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment
Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Perform an ce Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection                      Performance Indicator Results                                  Results Significance                      Significance Significance Threshold                          Threshold Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response Enclosure 2
*Security-Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials Enclosure 2 Our MissionTo license and regulate the nation's civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.


Enclosure 2 Reactor Oversight ProcessSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsStrategicPerformance AreasSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance Areas
Areas and Cornerstones REACTOR OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK MISSION:
Protect Public Health And Safety in the Use of Nuclear Power KEY AREAS:
Reactor Safety                Radiation Safety            Safeguards CORNERSTONES:
Initiating  Mitigating    Barrier    Emergency          Public        Occupational      Physical Events      systems    Integrity  Preparedness      Radiation        Radiation      Protection CROSS-CUTTING AREAS:          Human Performance          Safety Conscious Work              Problem Identification and Environment                          Resolution Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 REACTOR OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK MISSION:                                                        KEY AREAS:                                    CORNERSTONES:                                                                                                                            CROSS-CUTTINGAREAS:Areas and CornerstonesProtect Public Health And Safety in the Use of Nuclear PowerReactorSafetyRadiationSafetySafeguardsInitiatingEventsMitigatingsystemsBarrierIntegrit yEmergencyPreparednessPublicRadiationOccupationalRadiationPhysical ProtectionHumanPerformanceSafetyConscious Work EnvironmentProblemIdentification and Resolution
Performance Indicators Objective data to monitor plant performance Use established thresholds that are predictable Crossing thresholds indicate a change in safety margin Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 Performance IndicatorsObjective data to monitor plant performanceUse established  thresholds that are predictable Crossing thresholds indicate a change in safety margin
Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green  Baseline Inspection White  Requires additional NRC oversight Yellow  Requires more NRC oversight Red    Requires most NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green  Very low safety issue White  Low to moderate safety issue Yellow Substantial safety issue Red    High safety issue Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 Significance ThresholdGreenBaseline InspectionWhiteRequires additional NRC oversightYellowRequires more NRC oversightRedRequires most NRC oversightPerformance IndicatorsInspection FindingsGreenVery low safety issueWhiteLow to moderate safety issueYellowSubstantial safety issueRedHigh safety issue
Action Matrix Concept Multiple/Rep Licensee Regulatory    Degraded              Unacceptable Degraded Response  Response  Cornerstone              Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 Action Matrix ConceptIncreasing Safety SignificanceIncreasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management InvolvementIncreasing Regulatory ActionsLicensee ResponseRegulatory Response Degraded Cornerstone Multiple/Rep Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable Performance
NRC Annual Assessment Summary Turkey Point Unit 3 and Unit 4 Florida Power & Light operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
Turkey Point Unit 3 was in the Regulatory Response Column of the Action Matrix for the entire 2013 assessment period.
Turkey Point Unit 4 was in the Licensee Response Column of the Action Matrix for the entire 2013 assessment period.
Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 NRC Annual Assessment SummaryFlorida Power & Light operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.Turkey Point Unit 3 was in the Regulatory Response Column of the Action Matrix for the entire 2013 assessment period.Turkey Point Unit 4 was in the Licensee Response Column of the Action Matrix for the entire 2013 assessment period.Turkey Point Unit 3 and Unit 4
NRC Annual Assessment Summary Turkey Point Unit 3 Performance Indicators Turkey Point Unit 3 was in the Regulatory Response Column for all 4 quarters of the 2013 assessment period due to reactor trips that caused the Unplanned Scrams per 7,000 Critical Hours indicator to be in the White performance band.
Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 NRC Annual Assessment SummaryTurkey Point Unit 3 was in the Regulatory Response Column for all 4 quarters of the 2013 assessment period due to reactor trips that caused the Unplanned Scrams per 7,000 Critical Hours indicator to be in the White performance
Summary of Plant Performance Licensee Response                    80 Regulatory Response                    9 Degraded Cornerstone                  9 Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone  1 Unacceptable (IMC 0350)                1 Total                                100 Enclosure 2


band.Turkey Point Unit 3 Performance Indicators
Information on the Fukushima Accident
* Actions in response to Fukushima Accident: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/
ops-experience/japan-dashboard.html
* Mailbox for comments on staff actions:
JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov
* Office of Public Affairs Point of


Enclosure 2 Summary of Plant PerformanceLicensee Response  80Regulatory Response  9 Degraded Cornerstone  9 Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone1 Unacceptable  (IMC 0350)1 Total100 Enclosure 2 Information on the Fukushima Accident*Actions in response to Fukushima Accident: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard.html*Mailbox for comments on staff actions: JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov*Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact: OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200
==Contact:==
OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 NRC Social Media Channels*Blog:http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/*Flickr:http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/*Twitter:https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov*YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov*RSS:http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html#rss
NRC Social Media Channels
* Blog:       http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/
* Flickr:     http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/
* Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov
* YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov
* RSS:       http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html#rss Enclosure 2


Enclosure 2 QUESTIONS}}
QUESTIONS Enclosure 2}}

Latest revision as of 20:44, 5 February 2020

Public Meeting Summary - Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251
ML14156A221
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/04/2014
From: Shane Sandal
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
To: Rich D
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
References
Download: ML14156A221 (18)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 June 4, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: Daniel W. Rich, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects FROM: Shane Sandal /RA/

Senior Project Engineer Reactor Projects Branch 3

SUBJECT:

PUBLIC MEETING

SUMMARY

- TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND 50-251 On May 21, 2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff met with members of the public concerning the annual assessment of Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of the meeting was to provide opportunities to discuss the annual assessment of Turkey Point with the public for the period of January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. Enclosed is a list of attendees and the Turkey Point annual assessment meeting presentation.

The following Region 2 and Headquarters NRC staff attended the public meeting:

Mark Lesser, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects Daniel Rich, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 3, Division of Reactor Projects Tim Hoeg, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point Audrey Klett, Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Marlen Rodriguez, Site Administrative Assistant, Turkey Point Docket Nos.: 50-250 and 50-251 License No.: DPR-31, DPR-41

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees
2. Meeting Presentation

_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE SRS5 /RA/ DWR1 /RA/

NAME SSandal DRich DATE 6/4/2014 6/4/2014 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Annual Assessment Meeting 2013 Performance Assessment Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region 2 Enclosure 2

NRC Organization

  • 5 member Commission led by the Chairman
  • Commissioners serve five-year terms
  • ~4000 employees with ~$1 billion budget
  • Four regional offices:

Region I, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Region II, Atlanta, Georgia Region III, Lisle, Illinois Region IV, Arlington, Texas Enclosure 2

NRC Strategic Plan Goals

  • Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment
  • Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials Enclosure 2

Our Mission To license and regulate the nations civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.

Enclosure 2

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Perform an ce Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Performance Indicator Results Results Significance Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response Enclosure 2

Areas and Cornerstones REACTOR OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK MISSION:

Protect Public Health And Safety in the Use of Nuclear Power KEY AREAS:

Reactor Safety Radiation Safety Safeguards CORNERSTONES:

Initiating Mitigating Barrier Emergency Public Occupational Physical Events systems Integrity Preparedness Radiation Radiation Protection CROSS-CUTTING AREAS: Human Performance Safety Conscious Work Problem Identification and Environment Resolution Enclosure 2

Performance Indicators Objective data to monitor plant performance Use established thresholds that are predictable Crossing thresholds indicate a change in safety margin Enclosure 2

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green Baseline Inspection White Requires additional NRC oversight Yellow Requires more NRC oversight Red Requires most NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green Very low safety issue White Low to moderate safety issue Yellow Substantial safety issue Red High safety issue Enclosure 2

Action Matrix Concept Multiple/Rep Licensee Regulatory Degraded Unacceptable Degraded Response Response Cornerstone Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions Enclosure 2

NRC Annual Assessment Summary Turkey Point Unit 3 and Unit 4 Florida Power & Light operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.

Turkey Point Unit 3 was in the Regulatory Response Column of the Action Matrix for the entire 2013 assessment period.

Turkey Point Unit 4 was in the Licensee Response Column of the Action Matrix for the entire 2013 assessment period.

Enclosure 2

NRC Annual Assessment Summary Turkey Point Unit 3 Performance Indicators Turkey Point Unit 3 was in the Regulatory Response Column for all 4 quarters of the 2013 assessment period due to reactor trips that caused the Unplanned Scrams per 7,000 Critical Hours indicator to be in the White performance band.

Enclosure 2

Summary of Plant Performance Licensee Response 80 Regulatory Response 9 Degraded Cornerstone 9 Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone 1 Unacceptable (IMC 0350) 1 Total 100 Enclosure 2

Information on the Fukushima Accident

ops-experience/japan-dashboard.html

  • Mailbox for comments on staff actions:

JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov

  • Office of Public Affairs Point of

Contact:

OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 Enclosure 2

NRC Social Media Channels

QUESTIONS Enclosure 2