ML20204E812: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:.
,
      -
  .
                                              JUL 25 B86
                                                                                        ,
        Docket No. 50-237
        Docket No. 50-249
        Commonwealth Edison Company
        ATTN:  Mr. Cordell Reed
                Vice President
        Post Office Box 767
        Chicago, IL 60690
        Gentlemen:
        'This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. T. Ploski and
        others of this office on July 8-10, 1986, of activities at Dresden Nuclear
        Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, authorized by NRC Operating Licenses
        No. DRP-19 and No. DRP-25, and to the discussion of our findings with
        Messrs. E. Eenigenburg and R. Flessner and others of your staff at the
        conclusion of the inspection.
        The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
        the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
        examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
        interviews with personnel.
        No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
        inspection. However, weaknesses were identified which will require corrective
        action by your staff. These weaknesses are summarized in the Appendix to this
        letter. As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that are
        identified must be corrected. Accordingly, please advise us within 45 days
        of the date of this letter of the corrective actions you have taken or plan to
        take, regarding these weaknesses, including the estimated dates of completion.
        Based on discussions at the conclusion of the inspection, we understand that
        the public address speaker in the Operations Support Center will be repaired
        and correctly interfaced with the Technical Support Center announcing system
        by September 10, 1986. Furthermore, we understand that a 1987 exercise
        objective will be to demonstrate the ability to collect and analyze air or
        liquid samples onsite using the High Range Sample System, since that objective
        was waived for this inspection due to an equipment breakdown.
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
        this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
        in the NRC Public Document Room.
        The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance procedures
        of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction
        Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
                          g
    %
    G
          e0{ % $
                                                              _.            ..
 
T
    *
  .
        Commonwealth Edison Company                      2
                                                                                            JK 25 W
      We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
                                                    Sincerely,
                                              ' Original signed by W.D.' E M aE                                                                '-
                                                    W. D. Shafer, Chief
                                                    Emergency Preparedness and
                                                              Radiological Protection Branch                                                  ,
                                                                                                                                              ,.
        Enclosures:
        1. Exercise Weaknesses
      2.    Inspection Reports
                No.  50-237/86009(DRSS);
                No.  50-249/860ll(DRSS)
      cc w/ enclosures:
      D. L. Farrar, Director
          of Nuclear Licensing
      D. J. Scott, Plant Manager
      DCS/RSB (RIDS)
      ' Licensing Fee Management Branch
      Resident Inspector, RIII
      Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
          General's Office, Environmental
          Control Division                      -
      D. Matthews, EPB, 0IE
      W. Weaver, FEMA V
                                                                                                                                              l
                                                                                                    f 1
      RIII              RIII            RIII                                RII
      u%5        7      cdGh
                        Ploski
                                        LJLS
                                        Snell
                                                                                                    /
      Allen / rr                                                            Boy 8                .
                                                                                                        .rg
        ry%              '/' 'I* '      s///*s                            -143J                        Uv
          gj              y *'                                                            W'
                                          fel
                                                    . . _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ . . . _ . , _ . . _      . _ , _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . . .
 
                                                                                          _      _ _ - _ _ _
.
                                                            Appendix
                                                        EXERCISE WEAKNESSES
  1. Excessive time was taken to initiate assembly.                        (50-237/86009-01 and
    50-249/86011-01) (Section 5.b)
  2. Poor radiation protection practices were demonstrated regarding the
    control of contaminated material and surveying for personnel                                            ,
    contamination.  (50-237/86009-02 and 50-249/86011-02) (Sections 5.c and                                l
    5.e)                                                                                                    !
  3. Proper dosimetric devices were not issued to emergency response team
    members.  (50-237/86009-03 and 50-249/86011-03) (Section 5.c)
  4. Improper controller action resulted in advance reporting of data and
    incorrect resolution of an exercise conflict. (50-237/86009-04 and
    50-249/86011-04) (Section 5.f)
                        _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:05, 30 December 2020

Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-237/86-09 & 50-249/86-11 on 860708-10.No Violations Noted.Weaknesses Summarized in App: Excessive Time Taken to Initiate Assembly & Poor Radiation Practices
ML20204E812
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/1986
From: Shafer W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20204E818 List:
References
NUDOCS 8608010264
Download: ML20204E812 (3)


See also: IR 05000237/1986009

Text

.

,

-

.

JUL 25 B86

,

Docket No. 50-237

Docket No. 50-249

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

'This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. T. Ploski and

others of this office on July 8-10, 1986, of activities at Dresden Nuclear

Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, authorized by NRC Operating Licenses

No. DRP-19 and No. DRP-25, and to the discussion of our findings with

Messrs. E. Eenigenburg and R. Flessner and others of your staff at the

conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this

inspection. However, weaknesses were identified which will require corrective

action by your staff. These weaknesses are summarized in the Appendix to this

letter. As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that are

identified must be corrected. Accordingly, please advise us within 45 days

of the date of this letter of the corrective actions you have taken or plan to

take, regarding these weaknesses, including the estimated dates of completion.

Based on discussions at the conclusion of the inspection, we understand that

the public address speaker in the Operations Support Center will be repaired

and correctly interfaced with the Technical Support Center announcing system

by September 10, 1986. Furthermore, we understand that a 1987 exercise

objective will be to demonstrate the ability to collect and analyze air or

liquid samples onsite using the High Range Sample System, since that objective

was waived for this inspection due to an equipment breakdown.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance procedures

of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

g

%

G

e0{ % $

_. ..

T

.

Commonwealth Edison Company 2

JK 25 W

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

' Original signed by W.D.' E M aE '-

W. D. Shafer, Chief

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch ,

,.

Enclosures:

1. Exercise Weaknesses

2. Inspection Reports

No. 50-237/86009(DRSS);

No. 50-249/860ll(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosures:

D. L. Farrar, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

D. J. Scott, Plant Manager

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

' Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Phyllis Dunton, Attorney

General's Office, Environmental

Control Division -

D. Matthews, EPB, 0IE

W. Weaver, FEMA V

l

f 1

RIII RIII RIII RII

u%5 7 cdGh

Ploski

LJLS

Snell

/

Allen / rr Boy 8 .

.rg

ry% '/' 'I* ' s///*s -143J Uv

gj y *' W'

fel

. . _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ . . . _ . , _ . . _ . _ , _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . . .

_ _ _ - _ _ _

.

Appendix

EXERCISE WEAKNESSES

1. Excessive time was taken to initiate assembly. (50-237/86009-01 and

50-249/86011-01) (Section 5.b)

2. Poor radiation protection practices were demonstrated regarding the

control of contaminated material and surveying for personnel ,

contamination. (50-237/86009-02 and 50-249/86011-02) (Sections 5.c and l

5.e)  !

3. Proper dosimetric devices were not issued to emergency response team

members. (50-237/86009-03 and 50-249/86011-03) (Section 5.c)

4. Improper controller action resulted in advance reporting of data and

incorrect resolution of an exercise conflict. (50-237/86009-04 and

50-249/86011-04) (Section 5.f)

_ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _