ML20151E813

Forwards Safeguards Insp Repts 50-010/88-04,50-237/88-16 & 50-249/88-17 on 880628-30.Rept Details & Notice of Violation Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)

ML20151E813
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	07/12/1988
From:	Mallett B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20151E816	List: IR 05000010/1988004 ML20151E813
References
NUDOCS 8807260219
Download: ML20151E813 (2)

See also: IR 05000010/1988004

Text

.

.

.

,

Y C.D

V

p3 -,,,,,m ,-..-m-,

. o -, q

-

UM

~

1,41% E i n dylu'vit 1 i a vii

a

JUL 121988

Docket"No. 50-10

Docket No. 50-237

Docket-No. 50-249 3

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed

Senior Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

This refers to the reactive safeguards inspection conducted by

Mr. D. E. Funk, Jr. of this office on June 28 and 30, _1988, of activities

at Oresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, authorized'by NRC

Operating Licenses No. OPR-02, No. DPR-19, and No. DPR-25 and to the

discussion of our findings vich Mr. J. Mayer and members of his staff

at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation

of NRC requirsments, as described in the enclosed Notice. The inspection

showed that action had been taken to correct the identified violation and

to prevent recurrence. Our understanding of your corrective actions is

described in Paragraph 5 of the enclosed inspection report. Consequently,

no rep'iy to the violation is required. Inspection results also ident1fied

one otner violation of the security plan which is addressed in Section 4

of the report details. This violation meets the criteria of 10 CFR Part 2,

,

'

Appendiv C,Section V.G. as licensee identified and therefore, a separate

Notise of Violation will not be issued.

Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt

from disclosure according to Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations,

-

Section 73.21(c)(2). This 1iformation must be handled and protected in

accordance with the provisiens of 10 CFR 73.21. Consequently,<the enclosure

to this letter and our reno.t of this inspection will not be placed in the NRC

Public Document Room.

,

8807260219 80071 ?

p00

PDR ADOCK 0500 '10

-

G f- - U

Encle ero contain:

SAFEGl'ARDS IfDORMTION

Upon Separation This

~

g ,3 3 w , _. m , , , . - - . Pago is Decontrolled

vn V J M "i .j O h ~Vi \ Y N

- -----

. . -

'

,

-

Q A r r-m e 9 n n n t o * "- M f XM

vn Luvnisv0 liti Vatn; t i ivli

0

s.

Commonwealth Edison Company 2 JUL 1211988

'

'

We will gladly discuss any questions you.have concerning.this' inspection.

Sincerely,

Bruce S.- Mallett, Ph.D.,' Chief

Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards Branch

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

2. Inspection Reports

No. 50-10/88004(DRSS);

No. 50-237/88016(DRSS);

No. 50-249/88017(ORSS)

(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION) .

cc w/ enclosures: 1

H. Bliss,. Nuclear

Licensing Manager

J. Eenigenburg, Plant Manager )

NRR/DRIS/SGB j

NRR/DRIS/S1B l

NRR/DLPQ/?EB l

cc w/ enclosures, w/o i

UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS l

INFORMATION: )

DCD/DCB (RIOS) i

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Richard Hoobard

J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public

Utilities Division

l

l

l

F l

- p Enclosure contains

Funkt ms Creed Ring Malijtt SAFEGUARDS INFORMATI0

io"rAlded,n.o Upon separation this,

. OA"Im1 Anno w ' c/.n , t o W pago is Decontrolled

on L. v v i u w v n. .,.a