|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217H4661999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards Changes to EPIPs IAW 10CFR50.54(q) & 10CFR50,App E, Section V.Details of Changes Encl ML20216J8241999-09-30030 September 1999 Notifies of Removal of NRC Headquarters & Region III Offices from Controlled Copy Distribution of Certain CE Documents. Specific Documents,Associated Controlled Copy Numbers & NRC Location Affected Are Shown on Attachment to Ltr ML20211G1221999-08-27027 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Each of Comm Ed Nuclear Power Stations & Corporate Support Employees within Scope of Rule for six-month Period Ending 990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20210N5651999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Nuclear Generating Stations Emergency Plan, for Plants.With Summary of Changes ML20210L1061999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/99-13 on 990702-27.No Violations Noted.Insp Examined Activities in Areas of Facility Management & Control & Radiological Safety ML20210M9131999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC AL 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates, for Fys 2000 & 2001 for Comed ML20210D2961999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Corrected Info for DNPS Unit 3 MOR for June 1999. Year-to Date Forced Outage Hours Should Have Read 70 Hours Instead of 0 on Page 8.Error Also Affected Cumulative Forced Outage Hours Which Should Have Been 24,761 ML20210B7071999-07-16016 July 1999 Responds to Requesting Review & Approval of Three Proposed Changes to Ceco QA TR,CE-1A Per 10CFR50.54(a)(3) & 10CFR50.4(b)(7) ML20196J9061999-07-0101 July 1999 Provides Evidence That Util Maintains Guarantee of Payment of Deferred Premiums in Amount of $10 Million for Each of Thirteen Reactors,Per 10CFR140.21 ML20196J9131999-07-0101 July 1999 Submits Status of Nuclear Property Insurance Currently Maintained for Braidwood,Byron,Dresden,Lasalle County,Quad Cities & Zion Nuclear Power Stations,Per 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20209B8241999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Five 3.5 Inch Computer Diskettes Containing Revised Annual Dose Repts for 1994 Through 1998 for Individuals Receiving Neutron Dose Not Previously Included in Reported Total Effective Dose Equivalent Values.Without Diskettes ML20196K3231999-06-30030 June 1999 Informs That Effective 990703,NRC Project Management Responsibility for Dresden,Unit 1 Station Will Be Transferred to P Ray ML20196D3491999-06-18018 June 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/99-08 & 50-249/99-08 on 990408-0521.Four Non-Cited Violations Noted.Maint on safety- Related Emergency CR Not Performed Well.Low Impact Issues Re Communications Present in Operations,Maint & Security ML20212J0541999-06-17017 June 1999 Responds to Requesting That NRC Staff ...Allow BWR Plants Identified to Defer Weld Overlay Exams Until March 2001 or Until Completion of NRC Staff Review & Approval of Proposed Generic Rept,Whichever Comes First ML20195E3451999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards 3.5 Inch Computer Diskette Containing Revised File Format for Annual Dose Rept for 1998,per 990520 Telcon Request from Nrc.Each Station Data Is Preceded by Header Record,Which Provides Info Necessary to Identify Data ML20195D6351999-06-0404 June 1999 Notifies NRC of Actions That Has Been Taken in Accordance with 10CFR26, Fitness for Duty Programs ML20207G2571999-06-0303 June 1999 Informs That Effective 990328,NRC Ofc of NRR Underwent Reorganization.Within Framework of Reorganization,Division of Licensing Project Management Created ML20195B2301999-05-19019 May 1999 Requests Approval of Proposed Changes to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A,rev 66a.Attachment a Describes Changes,Reason for Change & Basis for Concluding That Revised QAP Incorporating Proposed Changes Continues to Satisfy 10CFR50AppB ML20206Q3111999-05-18018 May 1999 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards App a Records Being Released in Entirety ML20206P2431999-05-13013 May 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/99-09 on 990325-0506.Two Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20206F5381999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Magnetic Tape Containing Annual Dose Repts for 1998 for Braidwood,Byron,Dresden,Lasalle County,Quad Cities & Zion Nuclear Power Stations,Per 10CFR20.2206(c).Without Magnetic Tape ML20206B1501999-04-22022 April 1999 Forwards 1998 Occupational Radiation Exposure for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3. Rept Was Revised to Rept Only Individual Radiation Exposures Greater than 100 Mrem ML20206B2471999-04-20020 April 1999 Informs That SE Kuczynski Has Been Transferred to Position No Longer Requiring SRO License.Cancel License SOP-31030-1, Effective 990412 ML20205K5521999-04-0202 April 1999 Forwards Partially Withheld Security Insp Repts 50-010/99-07,50-237/99-07 & 50-249/99-07 on 990308-12.Two non-cited Violations Identified Involving Failure of Security Personnel to Implement Required Measures ML20205K5841999-03-31031 March 1999 Submits Rept on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors Owned by Comm Ed.Attachment 1 Contains Amount of Decommissioning Funds Estimated to Be Required Pursuant to 10CFR50.75(b) & (C) ML20196K7001999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3 Radioactive Effluent Release Rept,Jan-Dec 1998. ODCM Was Submitted by Ltr in Accordance with Dresden TS 6.9.A.4 of Dresden Tech Specs Section 6.14.A.3 ML20205D7231999-03-26026 March 1999 Informs That Region III Emergency Preparedness Inspector Will Be Provided Copy of Comed Exercise Manual for 990526 Annual Exercise at DNPS ML20205B4241999-03-23023 March 1999 Provides Results of drive-in Drill Conducted on 990208,as Well as Augmentation Phone Drills Conducted Since 981015,as Committed to in Util ML20207L7141999-03-0808 March 1999 Discusses Transmitting Changes Identified as Rev 59 to Security Plan for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3.Staff Determined That No NRC Approval Required in Accordance with 10CFR50.54(p) ML20207D6831999-03-0101 March 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Each Comed Nuclear Power Station & Corporate Support Employees for Six Month Period Ending 981231,per 10CFR26.71(d) ML20207E0931999-02-26026 February 1999 Informs That Region III EP Inspectors Will Be Provided One Copy of Exercise Evaluation Objectives for 990526 Annual Exercise at Dresden Station as Enclosure to Ltr for Review. Proprietary Encl Withheld ML20203G3631999-02-10010 February 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/99-02 on 981218-990129.No Violations Noted.During Insp,Activities in Area of Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities & Radiological Safety Were Examined ML20203F2541999-02-10010 February 1999 Informs That Beginning 990216,DE Hills Will Be Chief of Operations Branch Which Includes Operator Licensing Function ML20203C7001999-02-0202 February 1999 Informs That Mhb Technical Associates No Longer Wishes to Receive Us Region III Docket Info Re Comed Nuclear Facilities.Please Remove Following Listing from Service List ML20202G0621999-01-25025 January 1999 Forwards 1998 Revs to Commitments Rept Made in Docketed Correspondence for Dresden Nuclear Power Station ML20199F3291999-01-14014 January 1999 Ack Receipt of Ltr Dtd 981230,transmitting Changes Identified as Rev 59 to Plant Security Plan,Submitted Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) ML20199E0201999-01-12012 January 1999 Forwards Change to Bases of Dnps,Unit 1 TS Section 3.10, Fuel Handling & Storage. Change Eliminates Reference to Initiation of Generating Station EP Action That Is Incorrect & Not Part of Reason for Min FSP Water Level TS ML20199C8851999-01-11011 January 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Dnps,Units 1,2 & 3,as Required by TS 6.9.A.5.Year-to-date Generator Hours for Unit 2 for Oct 1998 & Nov 1998 Corrected in Rept ML20206P7411999-01-0707 January 1999 Informs of Delay in Implementation of Strategic Reform Initiative Action Steps.Util Mgt Now Preceeding to Implement Succession Planning Steps for Corporate Ofc & Expects Completion of Action Steps 2 & 3 by 990128 ML20198N7691998-12-30030 December 1998 Forwards Rev 59 to Security Plan for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,In Accordance with 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Rev Withheld ML20198A2531998-12-10010 December 1998 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes Identified as Rev 57 to Plant Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required ML20198A2511998-12-10010 December 1998 Ack Receipt of ,Which Transmitted Changes Identified as Rev 58 to Plant Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required ML20196E2371998-11-27027 November 1998 Discusses Licensee ,Requesting That Agreement in Be Changed to Reflect Latest NRC Conditions Requiring Licensees to Notify NRC of Transfer of Assets to Affiliates Imposed in Connection with Approval of Transfer ML20196B5871998-11-20020 November 1998 Requests That Svc List for All NRC Correspondence Re Any of Six Comed Nuclear Stations Be Modified Per Attached List.All Other Names Previously Listed Should Be Removed ML20196A4121998-11-19019 November 1998 Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to QA TR CE-1-A,Rev 66,by ,As Modified by Ltrs & 1027.Proposed QA Tr,Rev 66 Continues to Comply with Criteria of 10CFR50,App B ML20195J4271998-11-13013 November 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/98-18,50-237/98-27 & 50-249/98-27 on 981013-16 & Notice of Violation.Mgt Activities Were Focused Toward Maintaining Effective Security Program ML20195E6451998-11-12012 November 1998 Provides Results of drive-in Drill Conducted on 981007,as Well as Augmentation Phone Drill Conducted on 980917 ML20195F3461998-11-10010 November 1998 Forwards Rev 58 of DNPS Security Plan,Including Listed Changes,Iaw 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Encl Withheld Ref 10CFR73.21 ML20155D2701998-10-27027 October 1998 Forwards Changed Pages from 980423 Submittal Providing Addl Info Marked with Revision Bars & Revised Pages to QA Topical Rept Section 18,for Review ML20154P9051998-10-20020 October 1998 Ack Receipt of 980821 Submittal,Per 10CFR50.54(a),requesting Review & Approval of Proposed Changes That Reduce Commitments in QA TR,CE-1-A.Util Should Refrain from Implementing Subj Changes Until Formal Notification Given 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:NRC TO UTILITY
MONTHYEARML20058G2941990-11-0505 November 1990 Advises That Written & Operating Operator & Senior Operator Licensing Exams Scheduled for Wk of 910204 & Requests Listed Ref Matls 60 Days Prior to Exam Date ML20058E7141990-10-30030 October 1990 Forwards Exam Forms & Answer Keys,Grading Results & Individual Answer Sheets for Each Applicant ML20059M2101990-09-25025 September 1990 Forwards Info Re Generic Fundamentals Exam Section of Operator Licensing Written Exams to Be Administered on 901010,including Map of Area Where Exams Will Be Taken, Preliminary Instructions for Exam & Equation Sheet ML20058M6141990-08-0707 August 1990 Forwards Sample Registration Ltr for 901010 Generic Fundamentals Section of Written Operator Licensing Exam. Registration Ltr Listing Names of Candidates Taking Exam Should Be Submitted to Region 30 Days Prior to Exam Date ML20055G2951990-07-13013 July 1990 Advises That SALP 9 Presentation Time Changed Due to Commissioner Carr Visit on 900723 ML20059M8791990-06-13013 June 1990 Forwards NRC Performance Indicators for First Quarter 1990. W/O Encl ML20043F7741990-06-0505 June 1990 Advises That 900412 Rev 58 to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A, Satisfies Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & Acceptable ML20043C5541990-05-29029 May 1990 Confirms Plan to Conduct Mgt Meeting on 900531 to Discuss General Topics of Mutual Interest ML20042G7621990-05-0909 May 1990 Provides Info Re Generic Fundamentals Exam Section of Operator Licensing Written Exam to Be Administered on 900606.Map of Area Including Time & Location Where Exams Will Be Administered Also Encl ML20042E8941990-04-20020 April 1990 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-456/90-11,50-457/90-14, 50-454/90-13,50-455/90-12,50-237/90-14,50-249/90-13, 50-373/90-07,50-374/90-08,50-254/90-07,50-265/90-07, 50-295/90-10 & 50-304/90-11 on 900220-0404 ML20033G8251990-04-0202 April 1990 Advises That 900309 Rev 30 to Station Security Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable. Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20006E1511990-02-12012 February 1990 Advises That 891201 Rev 57 to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.App B & Acceptable ML20006B2011990-01-24024 January 1990 Advises That 891027 Response to Generic Ltr 88-20 Re Individual Plant Exam Approach,Methodology & Schedule Acceptable ML20005F1701990-01-0909 January 1990 Forwards Safety Evaluation Concluding That Use of Mobil Greases for Limitorque Actuators as Substitute for Currently Used Exxon Greases Acceptable,In Response to NRC Diagnostic Evaluation Team Aug 1986 Insp Findings ML20006A7861990-01-0404 January 1990 Advises That 891222 Rev 29 to Security Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20005G3621989-12-18018 December 1989 Forwards Revised NRC Forms 396 & 398 Re Certification of Medical Exam by Facility Licensee & Personal Qualification statement-licensee,respectively,reflecting Changes of Operator Licensing Process ML19332F9381989-12-12012 December 1989 Advises That 891127 Rev 28 to Plant Security Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable.Figure 5-2, Reflecting Elimination of Certain Gates,Should Be Transmitted to NRC within 30 Days ML19332G4061989-12-11011 December 1989 Confirms 891220 Meeting W/Util in Downers Grove,Il to Discuss Items of Mutual Interest Re Operation of Util Facilities IR 05000237/19890181989-09-0808 September 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-237/89-18 & 50-249/89-17 on 890715-0828.No Violations Noted ML20246K6121989-08-25025 August 1989 Advises That 890818 Proposed Scope & Objectives for Plant Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scheduled for 891101 Acceptable ML20246D0711989-08-10010 August 1989 Forwards Amends 107 & 102 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25, Respectively & Safety Evaluation.Amends Revise Testing Requirements for Other Sys or Subsystems of ECCS or Standby Gas Treatment Sys When One Sys or Subsystem Inoperable ML20248D6921989-08-0404 August 1989 Advises That Rev 6b to Generating Stations Emergency Plan Transmitted by Util 890710 Form Acceptable & Does Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan ML20248D6401989-08-0404 August 1989 Forwards FEMA Transmitting Revised Exercise Rept for Sept 1987 Emergency Exercise at Plant.No Deficiencies Noted.Six Areas Requiring Corrective Action Identified.Nrc Expects Util to Devote Attention to Resolving Concerns IR 05000010/19890021989-07-31031 July 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Repts for 50-010/89-02,50-237/89-17 & 50-249/89-16 on 890530-0714 & Notice of Violation ML20245G4591989-06-21021 June 1989 Forwards Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amend to License DPR-2 Re 860107 Application Concerning Decommissioning Plan & Safstor ML20245B1731989-06-15015 June 1989 Ack Receipt of Rev 55 to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A.Program Satisfies Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & Acceptable ML20247G5241989-05-18018 May 1989 Responds to Re Util Position on Dealing W/Dc Grounds After Discussion W/Nrc in 890301 Meeting.Continued Plant Operation Will Be Allowed Only So Long as Applicable Limiting Conditions/Or Action Statements Met ML20246F9731989-05-0303 May 1989 Advises That Requalification Program Evaluation Scheduled for Wk of 890828.Listed Ref Matl Requirements Necessary 60 Days Prior to Exam Date ML20236B7611989-03-0808 March 1989 Advises That Rev 5b to Plant Emergency Plan Consistent W/ Provisions of 10CFR50.54(q) & Acceptable.Approval of Emergency Action Levels (EAL) Does Not Preclude Additions to Upgraded EALs Resulting from NRC Review of Decommissioning ML20235Z6501989-03-0707 March 1989 Ack Receipt of 890127 Submittal of Rev 54 to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A.Program Continues to Satisfy Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & Acceptable ML20246L7481989-03-0303 March 1989 Confirms 890323 Meeting in Glen Ellyn,Il to Discuss Util Quality Verification Program,Per ML20236A0461989-03-0202 March 1989 Advises That 890228 Rev 26 to Plant Security Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable IR 05000237/19890061989-02-28028 February 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-237/89-06 on 890123,24,27 & 0214-16.No Violations Noted ML20235T2541989-02-28028 February 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-249/89-04 on 880604-890208 & Forwards Notice of Violation ML20205J4331988-10-24024 October 1988 Advises That 881023 Rev 25 to Physical Security Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20207L5581988-10-0707 October 1988 Advises That 880912 Rev 52 to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A Consistent W/Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & Acceptable ML20154Q4071988-09-27027 September 1988 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Proposed Tech Specs Changes,Decommissioning Plan & Environ Rept to Delete Authority to Operate Facility ML20153G9491988-08-31031 August 1988 Advises That 880809 Rev 6B to Emergency Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(q) & Acceptable ML20207F8881988-07-27027 July 1988 Forwards Latest Rev of NRC Manual Chapter 0516, Salp. Region III Will Begin Using New Functional Areas Set Forth in Rev for All SALP Rept Periods Which Extend Beyond 880606 Effective Date of Procedure ML20151E8131988-07-12012 July 1988 Forwards Safeguards Insp Repts 50-010/88-04,50-237/88-16 & 50-249/88-17 on 880628-30.Rept Details & Notice of Violation Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20151C9871988-07-12012 July 1988 Confirms 880706 Plans Re 880714 Mgt Meeting at Region III to Discuss Plant Performance ML20150F9801988-07-0808 July 1988 Informs That 880527 Rev 24 to Security Plan for Facility Consistent w/10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable.Stated Item Deleted Due to Administrative Error Must Be Returned to Plan.Encl Withheld ML20150D8901988-07-0707 July 1988 Requests Addl Info Re Emergency Plan Requirements for Fuel Storage.Lists Questions Requiring Licensee Response Needed for Evaluation of Emergency Action Levels in Emergency Plan.Rev of Site Emergency Plan Suggested ML20150B4481988-07-0505 July 1988 Forwards Hj Miller 880608 Memo Re Site Visit to Attend Exit Meeting for Insp of Emergency Operating Procedures & to Tour Facility ML20150B8991988-06-23023 June 1988 Forwards Draft Rev 5 to ES-601, Administration of NRC Requalification Program Evaluations. W/O Encl ML20153E8941988-05-0303 May 1988 Forwards Safeguards Insp Repts 50-010/88-03,50-237/88-07 & 50-249/88-08 on 880404-08 & Notice of Violation.Notice of Violation Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20151Z9261988-05-0202 May 1988 Advises That Changes to 880418 Revs 49 & 50 to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A Meets Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & Acceptable ML20151Y4951988-04-26026 April 1988 Notifies That Submittals Re Allegations Concerning Use of Poor Matls & Poor Mfg Practices by C&S Valve Co Have Been Reviewed.Util Procedures Re safety-related Purchases in Accordance W/Specs.Allegation Considered Closed ML20148E4701988-03-18018 March 1988 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-254/87-28 & 50-265/87-28 on 870914-880304 & Notice of Violation ML20147J1891988-03-0404 March 1988 Requests Remittance of Fee for Review of 871222 Application Re Decommissioning Documents for Facility 1990-09-25
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20210L1061999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/99-13 on 990702-27.No Violations Noted.Insp Examined Activities in Areas of Facility Management & Control & Radiological Safety ML20210B7071999-07-16016 July 1999 Responds to Requesting Review & Approval of Three Proposed Changes to Ceco QA TR,CE-1A Per 10CFR50.54(a)(3) & 10CFR50.4(b)(7) ML20196K3231999-06-30030 June 1999 Informs That Effective 990703,NRC Project Management Responsibility for Dresden,Unit 1 Station Will Be Transferred to P Ray ML20196D3491999-06-18018 June 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/99-08 & 50-249/99-08 on 990408-0521.Four Non-Cited Violations Noted.Maint on safety- Related Emergency CR Not Performed Well.Low Impact Issues Re Communications Present in Operations,Maint & Security ML20212J0541999-06-17017 June 1999 Responds to Requesting That NRC Staff ...Allow BWR Plants Identified to Defer Weld Overlay Exams Until March 2001 or Until Completion of NRC Staff Review & Approval of Proposed Generic Rept,Whichever Comes First ML20207G2571999-06-0303 June 1999 Informs That Effective 990328,NRC Ofc of NRR Underwent Reorganization.Within Framework of Reorganization,Division of Licensing Project Management Created ML20206Q3111999-05-18018 May 1999 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards App a Records Being Released in Entirety ML20206P2431999-05-13013 May 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/99-09 on 990325-0506.Two Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20205K5521999-04-0202 April 1999 Forwards Partially Withheld Security Insp Repts 50-010/99-07,50-237/99-07 & 50-249/99-07 on 990308-12.Two non-cited Violations Identified Involving Failure of Security Personnel to Implement Required Measures ML20207L7141999-03-0808 March 1999 Discusses Transmitting Changes Identified as Rev 59 to Security Plan for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3.Staff Determined That No NRC Approval Required in Accordance with 10CFR50.54(p) ML20203G3631999-02-10010 February 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/99-02 on 981218-990129.No Violations Noted.During Insp,Activities in Area of Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities & Radiological Safety Were Examined ML20203F2541999-02-10010 February 1999 Informs That Beginning 990216,DE Hills Will Be Chief of Operations Branch Which Includes Operator Licensing Function ML20199F3291999-01-14014 January 1999 Ack Receipt of Ltr Dtd 981230,transmitting Changes Identified as Rev 59 to Plant Security Plan,Submitted Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) ML20198A2531998-12-10010 December 1998 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes Identified as Rev 57 to Plant Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required ML20198A2511998-12-10010 December 1998 Ack Receipt of ,Which Transmitted Changes Identified as Rev 58 to Plant Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required ML20196E2371998-11-27027 November 1998 Discusses Licensee ,Requesting That Agreement in Be Changed to Reflect Latest NRC Conditions Requiring Licensees to Notify NRC of Transfer of Assets to Affiliates Imposed in Connection with Approval of Transfer ML20196A4121998-11-19019 November 1998 Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to QA TR CE-1-A,Rev 66,by ,As Modified by Ltrs & 1027.Proposed QA Tr,Rev 66 Continues to Comply with Criteria of 10CFR50,App B ML20195J4271998-11-13013 November 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/98-18,50-237/98-27 & 50-249/98-27 on 981013-16 & Notice of Violation.Mgt Activities Were Focused Toward Maintaining Effective Security Program ML20154P9051998-10-20020 October 1998 Ack Receipt of 980821 Submittal,Per 10CFR50.54(a),requesting Review & Approval of Proposed Changes That Reduce Commitments in QA TR,CE-1-A.Util Should Refrain from Implementing Subj Changes Until Formal Notification Given ML20154F6291998-10-0606 October 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/98-16 on 980723-0918.No Violations Noted.During Period Covered by Insp,Activities in Areas of Facility Mgt & Control,Spent Fuel Safety & Radiological Safety Examined ML20154B6761998-10-0101 October 1998 Informs That NRC Reviewed Comm Ed Submittals & Finds,Util Has Adequately Addressed Actions in GL 95-07,as Discussed in Encl SE ML20153C4941998-09-21021 September 1998 Forwards SER Accepting Qualified Unit 1 Supervisor Initial & Continuing Training Program for Dresden Nuclear Power Station ML20237B1321998-08-11011 August 1998 Forwards Corrected Copy of NOV Re Insp Repts 50-010/98-15, 50-237/98-18 & 50-249/98-18 Conducted on 980601-04.Notice Did Not Contain Safeguards Info.Administrative Error Resulted in Document Being Marked as Safeguards Info ML20236P9451998-07-15015 July 1998 Forwards Emergency Response Data Sys Implementation Documents Including Data Point Library Updates for Oconee (Number 255),Dresden (Number 257) & Susquehanna (Number 258) ML20236L1151998-07-0606 July 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/98-13 on 980319-0630.No Violations Noted.Activities in Area of Facility Mgt & Control,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety Were Examined ML20236F1471998-06-29029 June 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/98-15,50-237/98-18 & 50-249/98-18 on 980601-0604.Areas Examined within Security Program Were Identified ML20236G9961998-06-26026 June 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/98-14 & 50-249/98-14 on 980403- 0527.No Violations Noted.Unavailability of HPCI Sys Continued to Be Problem at Dresden During Insp Period ML20249C3121998-06-23023 June 1998 Inorms That Proposed Revision 66 to QA Topical Rept,CE-1-A, Not Acceptable.Requests That Licensee Refrain from Implementing Changes Until Formally Notified ML20248B9431998-05-27027 May 1998 Discusses 980520 Public Meeting Re Dresden Unit 1 Decommissioning Activities & Dry Cask Storage Project. Meeting Handouts Encl ML20247E3061998-05-0808 May 1998 Confirms Discussion W/B Snell Re Agreement to Have Meeting on 980520 at Plant,Training Bldg to Discuss Unit 1 Status & Plans,Problem Identification & Prevention & Dry Cask Storage Status IR 05000010/19980081998-05-0101 May 1998 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-010/98-08, 50-237/98-08 & 50-249/98-08.Corrective Actions Will Be Examined During Future Insps ML20216G6311998-04-0909 April 1998 Summarizes 980312 Meeting Conducted at Region III Ofc in Lisle,Il,To Discuss Util Performance Re Action That Util Taken in Response to NRC 10CFR50.54(f) Ltr, Re Safety Performance at Facilities.List of Attendees Encl ML20217J2131998-04-0202 April 1998 Forwards Copy of Each Revised Forms 398,personal Qualifications Statement & 396,certification of Medical Exam by Facility Licensee.Due to Error on Instructions for Form 398,addendum for Completing Form Are Provided ML20217E8191998-03-26026 March 1998 Discusses Review of Dec 1997,rev 7K to Generating Stations Emergency Plan,Submitted Under Provisions 10CFR50.54(q).NRC Approval Not Required,Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan ML20217D5951998-03-25025 March 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/98-08,50-237/98-08 & 50-249/98-08 Conducted Between 980302 & 11.Areas within Security Program Were Examined.Nov & Insp Details Being Withheld ML20248L7911998-03-18018 March 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/98-02 on 971215-980226 & Nov.Rp Program Exhibited Number of Weaknesses.Program Declined Through Most of 1997 Until Control Informal,Personnel Not Well Informed or Disciplined & Mgt Involvement Lacking ML20216B8321998-03-0606 March 1998 Forwards Decommissioning Insp Plan for Remainder of FY98 for Plant,Unit 1,for Info.Plan Will Be Updated Approx Twice Each Yr & May Be Revised at Any Time Based on Future Insp Findings,Events & Resource Availability ML20203H9651998-02-26026 February 1998 Confirms Discussion to Have Meeting on 980312 in Lisle,Il to Discuss Comed Nuclear Operating Division Performance as Relates to Actions Comed Taken in Response to NRC Ltr ,re Safety Performance at Comed Nuclear Facilities ML20202H1701998-02-0909 February 1998 Discusses 980114 Meeting W/Listed Attendees in Lisle,Il to Discuss Commonwealth Edison Co Performance Re Actions Util Has Taken in Response to NRC 970127,10CFR50.54(f) Ltr Concerning Safety Performance at Util Facilities ML20203B1651998-02-0909 February 1998 Informs That Effective 980209 R Burrows Has Been Assigned as Project Manager for Plant,Unit 1 ML20202C7821998-02-0303 February 1998 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-010/97-19, 50-237/97-19 & 50-249/97-19.Corrective Actions Will Be Examined During Future Insp ML20198T4491998-01-20020 January 1998 Advises of Planned Insp Effort Resulting from Dresden Plant Performance Review.Details of Insp Plan for Next 6 Months Encl ML20198N7181998-01-15015 January 1998 Discusses Conversation Between I Johnson & J Gavula Re Cancellation of Planned Routine Mgt Meeting on 980122 in Lisle,Il ML20197H8761997-12-23023 December 1997 Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/97-26,50-237/97-26 & 50-249/97-26 on 971029 & 1106.No Violations Noted.Noncited Violation Re Failure to Implement FFD Provisions Contained in Plant Procedure Was Identified ML20197E9681997-12-19019 December 1997 Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/97-24,50-237/97-24 & 50-249/97-24 on 971016-1122 & Notice of Violation ML20197G5641997-12-19019 December 1997 Ask Receipt of Ltr Dated 971002,which Transmitted Changes Identified as Rev 56 to Dresden Nuclear Station Security Plan,Submitted Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Overall Effectiveness of Plan ML20203J6481997-12-16016 December 1997 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards Documents Listed in App A.Documents Will Be Available in PDR IR 05000010/19970201997-12-15015 December 1997 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-010/97-20, 50-237/97-20 & 50-249/97-20 on 971030 ML20203C1191997-12-0505 December 1997 Refers to Redacted Copy,Provided by Ceco on 971121,of Briefing Matls Used by INPO During 960314 & 970910 Presentations to Ceco Board of Directors.Requests That INPO Findings Be Related to Current Ceco Actions & Commitments ML20203C9241997-12-0404 December 1997 Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/97-19,50-237/97-19 & 50-249/97-19 on 970828-1016 & Nov.Three Procedures Lacked Sufficient Detail to Ensure That Activities Were Properly Performed 1999-08-02
[Table view] |
Text
y g;
',4e.
- w' L
}
s,
's M
,. +
A
=
b NOV - 51930 j
k>
l l Docket.No.I 50-10.
I FD.
Docket 110.'50-237,
' Docket No'. 50 249 y
Commonwealth Edison' Company 1ATTil:' Mr. Cordell Reed
- . Senior Vice President 7
W.
Opus West III T
,14_00~ Opus' Place :
F
< Downers Grove, Il c 60515
Dear fir. Reed:
.i I
-S BJECT:: 0PERATOR AllD Sell 10R OPERATOR LICEtiSIllG EXAt4IllATI0tlS o
n
~
, Inca telephone conversation between Mr. H. Peterson, Principal Examiner and-fir. 5. : Stiles,l Training Supervisor arrangements were made.for the 7'.
e
, administration of licensing and requalification retake examinations at the Dresden. Nuclear Power Station.1 y
Thewrittenlandoperatingexaminations'arescheduledfortheweekof-g
-February l4; 1990.
1m' In! order for us-to meet thisl schedule, it will be necessary for the facility;
'toifurnish the approved: reference material-listed.in Enclosure 1, " Reference 0
Material Requirements-for Reactor / Senior Reactor.0perator1 Licensing l
- Examinations"j at
- 1 east 60 days. prior to the examination date. - Any substandard:
- or; incomplete:materialcor delay in receiving; approved properly bound.and?
i lindexed reference-material may result in a delay in administering:the-
>i examinations; -.itrbStiles has been advised oftourtroference materia 1Lrequirements, j
9 thefnumber of reference material sets that are required, Land the_ examiners?
inames and addresses where each set is: to be mailed.
hTheL facility managementds; responsible-for providing~ adequate; space andi accommodationsLin order to properly l conduct the written: examinations.
Enclosure,2;;" Requirements for. Administration'of Written Examinations,"'
j
-describes ournrequirements-for conducting thesciexaminations..Mri Stiles.
has!also beeniinformed of.these~' requirements.
L2
-EnclosureL3 contains the Rules and Guidelines that will be inteffect'during
~
y
'the' administration of the written examination. The facility management is fresponsible;for ensuring'that all applicants are aware of these rules.
m
+
73 qThe facility staff: review of the written examination will be conducted-in s
accordance with requirements specified in Enclosure 4, " Requirements for n
' Facility. Review of Written Examinations." Mr. Stiles has been informed of these requirements, f
9011130051 901105 s
ADOCK0500ggO PDR
/6 YL
Commonwealth Edison Company 2
NOV - 5 E00 i
To better document simulator examinations, the Chief Examiner will have the facility simulator operator record predetermined plant conditions (i.e., plant l
pressure, temperature, pressurizer level, etc.), for each simulator scenario.
The applicants will be responsible for providing this information with any appeal of a simulator operating examination.. Therefore, the facility training staff should retain the simulator examination scenario information until all applicants who took the examinations have either passed the operating examination, accepted the denial of their license, or filed an g
appeal.
Preliminary reactor operator and senior reactor operator license applications should be submitted at least 30 days before the first examination dates so that we will be able to review the training and experience of the candidates, process the medical certifications, and prepare final examiner assignments af ter applicant eligibility has been determined.
If the applic-tions are not received at least 30 days before the examination dates, it is likely that a P
postponement will be necessary.
Final signed applications certifying that all training has been completed shall be submitted at least 14 days before the
=
first examination date.
However, if processing of a license application is not completed in time to make a determination of applicant eligibility, the candidate shall not be permitted to sit for the examination.
Therefore, it is recommended that license applications be provided as soon as possible to ensure an appropriate level of review.
This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget Clearance Number 3150-0101 which expires May 31, 1992. The estimated average burden is 7.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> per response, including gathering, xeroxing and mailing the required material.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including, suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Information and Records Management' Branch, Division of Information Support Services, Office of Information Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,D.C.20555;andtothePaperworkReductionProject(3150-0101),
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NE0B-3019, Office of Management' and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503.
mm L.
M
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, =
0
g3 n.
I Q.; % h, x n
o tm g,.
[
d;
+
,m; rp NOVI51990
,[1CommonwealthEdisonCompany:
13-
,t
@ s t Thank?you; forcyourJ consideration in this matter.
If ~you have' any
- questionsiregarding;theLexamination procedures and requirements,Lplease
-l 9
contactMr.H!;Petersonat(708).790-5797;.
m:w Sincerely, ht s
g
'6
- 0RIGttML StGNED BY GE0EffEY C. WRIGHI.
1 w:s Geoffrey C. Wright, Chief j
Operations Branch j
- t 4
- n,
T
Enclosures:
?
~ LReference Material.!Requi.rements b
11.3
'l
'for; Reactor /Ssnior Reactorf0perator
%J
~ Licensing Examinations 2.
Requirements:for;Administrationi
<W
,3.c: NRCL Rulesiand Guidelines For
.cf: Written Examinations.
,1 N
, -:WrittenaExaminationsi g
.4i Requirements for Facility. Review; d
s
.s l
lof, Written. Examinations ;
,a E
H6.
a M c'c w/ enclosures:!
,j 3
'7 i;DEGalle,)Vice} President'-!BWRi
, W perationsiKovach,: Nuclear'
!0
,7 d
W Licensing Managerm t.
A 4
JEO D;: Eeriigenburg L Station llanager d
F lDCD/DCB?(RIDS)r
~'
l J0C/LFDCB i c.,
,M
" Reside'ntiInspectors;LaSalle, i!
' ['y '
Dresden, Quad Cities':
3
- Richard Hubbard-o i
4 5 f ". % W.iMcCaffrey, Chie'f, Public' a
L Utilities ~Divisiont
,i JRobertSNewmann. Office:of Public 4
Cou'nsel,ustate of:111in'ois: Center h
yo
, ;. y;. :
T
. Ta S W R.t Stiles, Plant Training Manager fcciw/Afenclosurest.
j
' ' ?.B.;S_iegel,: Project-Manager, NRR..
J Z
f D. Lange. Acting ! Branch Chief, OLB; 1
g.f LJ.cH. Hinds,:Section Chief;:DRP j
1 3
~'.RI l l TRIII R 11 c
....p /
,1 J son /cg Jordan Wright y,
/Af90j
'10///90
.103/90
}l-e p-X l
l7
-l L;
q;-
m1
.q h i.- v -#
n 3
1 e-z.
ENCLOSURE 1 j
' REFERENCE' HATERI AL REQUIREMENTS FOR REACTOR / SENIOR REACTOR
' OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS l
1.
Existing' learning objectives, Job Performance Measures and lesson plans.
(including..trainingmanuals,plantorientationmanual, system i
, descriptions', reactor-theory, thermodynbmics, etc.)
e n
A~ copy of the facility Job and Task Analysis-(JTA), specifying the knowledges and abilities required of an operator at the facility.
Each particular knowledge.and/or ability _will include an importance rating correlating it.to ensuring the health and the safety of the public, if I
a JTA.is not. furnished,'the Knowledges and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear PowerPlantOperators,HUREG-1122-(1123) will-be used to-establish-content validity for.the' examination.-
?
All; Job Perf'ormance Measures '(JPMs) used to ascertain the competence of
- the operatorsLin
- performing tasks within the control room complex and, as
-identified in the facility JTAs, outside of the control' room, i.e.,. local
+
operations.:
i Training material's should include all substantive written material used
^
.for preparing applicants for' initial R0 and"SR0 licensing. The written 11.
material should include _-learning objectives and the details presented during: lectures, rathersthan. outlines. Training materials should be identified by. plant and unit, bound, and indexed.
FAILURE TO PROVIDE'
-i COMPLETE, PROPERLY; BOUND AND INDEXED PLANT' REFERENCE MATERIAL MAY RESULT-IN~THE RETURN OF.THE MATERIAL T0'THE PERSON WHO IS THE HIGHEST LEVEL 0F-CORPORATE: MANAGEMENT WH0:IS RESPONSIBLE'FOR PLANT OPERATICHS (E.G., VICE i
--PRESIDENT <0FHUCLEAR,0PERATIONS). ACCOMPANYlHG THE MATERIAL WILL BE A
) COVER LETTER EXPLAINING THE DEFICIENCIES'.IN THE REFERENCE MATERIAL AND THE FACT THAT-THIS WAS'THE-REASON THE EXAMINATIONS _WERE CANCELLED OR
- POSTP0NED. LTraining materials which lnclude the following;should'be' 3
provided:.
. System descriptions including descriptions of all operational _1y l
relevant flow paths,' components,-controls and instrumentation.
1 y"
- System training. material should draw parallels to the actual procedures > used for operating the-applicable system.
m
-Complete and operationally useful descriptions of all safety-system e
interactions and, where available, B0P system ; interactions under emergency;and' abnormal conditions,Lincluding consequences of p
anticipated operator error, maintenance error, and equipment failure.
o l
., L kI g.
L 1
fl /! >
%q[
>i; i
3 9 3,1 j I
1 uip;B ;
OPERATOR LICEtlSlilG ENCLOSURE 1 (Cont'd)
-Training material used to clarify and strengthen understanding of emergency operating procedures.
-2.
Complete Procedure Index (including surveillance procedures, etc.)
3.
All administrative procedures (as applicable to reactor operation or safety) 4.
All integrated plant procedures (normal or general operating procedures) 5.
All emergency procedures (emergency instructions, abnormal or special procedures) 6.
Standingorders(importantordersthataresafety-relatedandmay supersede the. regular procedures) 7.
Surveillance ~ procedures (procedures that are run frequently, i.e., weekly or that can be run on the simulator)
~
8.
Fuel-handling.and core-loading procedures, (initial core-loading procedure,when. appropriate) 9.
-.All annunciator / alarm procedures
- 10. Radiation protection manual (radiation control manual or procedures)
-11.
Emergency plan implementing procedures
- 12. : Technical Specification's (and interpretations,.if available) for all
. units for which licenses are sought.
13.: System operating procedures
- 14. Piping and instrumentation diagrams, electrical single-line diagrams, or. flow diagrams
- 15. Technical Data. Book,-and/or plant curve information as used by operators and facility precautions,; limitations, and set points.(PLS) for the f acility
- 16. E Questions and' answers specific to the facility training program which may
- be used in the written or operating examinations (voluntary by facility -
licensee) l
- 4,p m >
- p ~..
o n
LOPERATORLICENSINGENCLOSURE1-(Cont'd).
d
]
17..
The following on the plant reference simulation facility fa.
List of all preprogrammed initial. conditions-b.
b.
List of all preset malfunctions with a cicar identification number.
The list should include cause and effect information. Specifically, for each malfunction a concise description'of the' expected result, or range of results,'that_will occur.upon implementation should be provided. Additionally, an' indication of which annunciators are H
=to be-initially expected should be given.
M c.
A description of simulator failure capabilities for valves,.
~ '
l breakers,. indicators-and alarms f
d.
Where the capability exi.sts, an explanation of the ability to vary Lthe severity of a particular malfunctionL shall be provided,'i.e.,
ability to yary the size of. a given;LOCA or; steam: leak,'or the.
h
?
iability to cause a slow failure of a component such as.a feed pump,-
- )
h turbine generator lor' major valve (e.g.,' drifting shut of a main l
feedwater control valve)
- e.-
An. identification of modeling conditions / problems that mayi mpact' l
- the examination fa : Identification'of Lanyl known performance test discrepancies not yet corrected
' g' : lldentification of-differences between the. simulator and the-d reference plant's control room-h.
. Copies of facility: generated scenarios.that;e_xpose;the applicants to
?
. situations oftdegraded pressure control (PWR).. degraded heat removal:
heapability (PWR and:BWR).'and _ containment challenges"(PWR and BWR);
?
( '
imay be provided (voluntary by licensee) a 4
- 1, SimulatorJinstructors manual (voluntary byalicensee) y j.-
Description of the scenarios used:for.the' training class-(voluntary w
by licensee)
~
c18. : Additional material ' required by the examiners'to develop examinations 2
y that meet'the requirements of these Standards and the regulations.-
g-The above. reference material shall-be approved, final. issues and shall be.so i
marked.
If-a. plant has not finalized some of the material,.the-Chief Examiner i
sha11? verify with the facility that the most complete, up-to-date material is i
availableland that agreement has been reached with the licensee for limiting changes;before the administration of the-examination.
All procedures and i
1 3
s
w mm w'.
+
o
+
+
,, o gn.
WP 4
. l.'
W!
t...i; L.4 y.. -
U 3
(
- i i
4 b.
- t. 9.
3 p n w.. v.w w
e Rv,y-a A n..
._.t,
+
s z
0 f \\
g *w h',
fi f. -
h{' i d.
i 4
4, 5
n~ca.
t 4,. -
4
?
4 4 p...., f r !
6 5
y
_ N
-[ h J
' 4[{
i h M.. Y O,PERATb.R LICENSING ENCLOSURE f (Cont'd)--
s
.W r'
- Q-E E._ c m.
LM2).y--
.,.i t. '-
'W
[ '@
g g #et !' d referciickInateial"sh'allibe bound'with appropriate" indices or tables.of1 Jcontents sotthat they. can-be used: efficiently.
Failure ~to(provide complete, ff' properly? bound and4 indexed plant? reference material could result'in'
-f'
- cancellationjor! rescheduling of-the examinations..
!M, Y !r.
t t
- i. 4
~b y
g
~~'f',
z.
I'.
I n:e p i i,
h,,.4 4.I;2 F.N f' -l{?
.a i
4
.,. - +
f&N
.a
,p-_.
s<
n C
4e t.' ' ':s s
,4
(
' i,
'h?
f '..
t L."
m' 2 1
^
o
.I
~
."{
,h 5.. ;2 ]j l' a
I E
a..;.s c.',.-
t.
N. 3 m,1 i
4 i
'I $ !;
U.* b.
- w 4
4 '.
'- V N;
,y-q.j l -
s'
' g; w* :
i
+
y - -
4
-tg s
g3-.
A,.,. 5 mn e.
ll r
)
' I f
- G' J
'w r,
- 4
-n
.t 7
s
? fl x 4
fu+
a 4 t i
i g
n 7
- f g
4 1-I W '.: ), J 2
~
+
\\i 1][
w,'
c..-
s 3
.,..j_
y
-^
.\\., ',
_x J: ' '
a-Nf yQ 6 t\\. [ r'y'
'y:
t ski 7 y.'.
c s
g.u
+ >"",
JW '
s
,v
.r-i' 4'
,yc 5
$e!
.: g-i I.J.
S'.i q
,{
{.
4 -
I
", A,,yP.E, 4,W; J
.,a mm 9
, ;};1f
r YS:n +, w2 z.
~
r", ;
4 s
-R c g
1 k.'
Y t
v
~
- s.I
-i..
'J k
'm y s. %'
,j lv
, s
- (
3 E
y.r s
M n,
$ g 3' 4
1
- h g
~ -Y }
! 'i
+
i..
1
~y ;
i, DJ
'Qt e
.. ;l i.
.,;.i k ': 5 f t.,
1 4,
's
'a s
. r 1 -
)
W a
4 x
o q,
'*i'
- " ;j
- lit, n
is 1
+
r
+
- .i 5
>2.
m e,
I M, g.,
y; I
k
/
e F
s
- m. 9
)
u dL 5-p.;
v' s.
L
~T g
f
)
i 4
w p.
,a.
y
'!![
dip l
.. Mt F
. ;t f
+
Y
i 4
1 ENCLOSURE 2 l
REQUIREllENTS FOR ADlilNISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAt11NAT10tlS 1.-
A singic room shall be provided for administration of the written examina-i tion.- The location of this room and supporting restroom facilities shall be such as to prevent contact with all other facility and/or contractor i
personnel during:the written examination.
If necessary, the facility should make arrangement for the use of a suitable room at a local school, motel,-or other building. Obtaining this room is the responsibility of the ' licensee.
2.
11inimum spacing is required to ensure examination integrity as determined by the Chief Examiner. Minimum spacing should be one applicant per table, with a three-foot space between tables, i
3.
Suitable arrangements shall be made by the facility if the applicants are to have lunch, coffee or other refreshments.
These arrangements shall comply with item _1 above and shall be reviewed by the examiner and/or proctor.
i
-4..
The facility licensee shall provide pads of 8-1/2 by 11 inch lined paper in unopened packages for each applicant's use in completing the
. examination. The examiner shall distribute these_ pads to the applicants es needed.
5.
Applicants may bring pens, pencils, calculators or slide rules into the
. examination room. Only black ink or dark pencils should be used for writing answers to questions.
6.
The: licensee shall provide one set of steam tables for each applicant.
l The examiner shall distribute the steam tables to the applicants. tio t
wall charts,rr.odels, and/or other training materials shall be present in the examination room. No other equipment or reference material shall be i
allowed unless provided by'the examiner.
17. -
The facility staff shall be provided with a copy of the written examination and answer key after the last candidate has handed in his-written examination. The facility staff shall have five working days to provide formal _ written comments with supporting documentation regarding written examination-questions and answers to the Chief Examiner.
ENCLOSURE 3 PROCEDURES FOR THE ADitINISTRAT10110F WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS
'1.
Check identification badges.
l 2.
Pass'out' examinations and all handouts.
Remind applicants not to review examination until instructed to do so.
READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS VERBATlH:
During the administration of this examination the following rules apply:
1.
Cheating on the examination means an automatic denial of your application and could result in more severe penalties.
2..
' Af ter the examination has been completed, you must sign the statement on the cover sheet indicating that the work is your own and you have not received or given assistance in completing the examination. This must be.done after you complete the examination.
~ READ THE FOLLOW 1HG INSTRUCTIONS:
'3 1.
Restroom trips are to be limited and only one applicant at a time may 11 eave. You-must avoid all contacts with anyone outside the examination-room.to avoid even the appearance or possibility of cheating.
2.
Use black ink or dark pencil only to facilitate legible reproductions.
-: 3.
_' Print your name in;the blank provided in the upper right-hand corner of the examination cover sheet and each answer sheet.
_4..
flark your answers on the answer sheet provided.
USE OllLY THE PAPER
- PROVIDED AND DO NOT WRITE 011 THE-BACK SIDE OF THE PAGE.
5..
Before you' turn in your examination,' consecutively number each answer sheet.
6.
' use abbreviations only-if they are commonly used in facility literature. -
Avoid using symbols such as < or > signs to avoid a simple transposition 1
-error,resulting in an incorrect answer. Write it out,
+
i 7.
The point value for each question is indicated in-[ brackets] after the-
- question.
l
LICEllSE EXAMINATIONS ENCLOSURE 3 (Cont'd) 8.
Show all calculations, methods, or assumptions used to obtain an answer to any short answer questions.
9.
' Partial credit may be given.
Therefore, ANSWER ALL PARTS OF THE QUESTION AND 00 NOT LEAVE ANY ANSWER BLANK.
Partial credit will tt0T be given on multiple choice questions.
- 10. Proportional grading will be applied. Any additional wrong information that is provided may count against you.
For example, if a question is worth one point and asks for four responses, each of which is worth 0.25 points, and you give five responses, each of your responses will be worth 0.20' points.
If one of your five responses is incorrect, 0.20 will be deducted and your total credit for that question will be 0.80 instead of-1.00 even though you got the four correct answers.
-11.
If the. intent of a question'is unclear, ask questions of the examiner only.
When. turning in your examination, assemble the completed examination with
- 12..
. examination questions,-examination aids and answer-sheets.
In addition,
. turn in all scrap paper.
13.
Ensure all information you wish to have evaluated as part of your answer is on.your answer sheet.
Scrap paper will-be disposed of immediately following the examination.
- 14. To pass the examination, you must achieve.a grade of 80% or greater.
- 15. There is a= time limit of four (4). hours for completion of the examination.
- 16.. hen you are done-and have-turned in your examination, leave-the W
examination arer-(DEFIllE THE AREA).
If you are found in this area
-while the examination-is still in progress, your license may be
. denied or revoked.
.d
V.l qg a
4 v...
y a.
ENCt.0SURE 4
-REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITY REVIEW 0F WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS:
y e
' 1.
At.the option of the Section Chief, the facility may review the written examination up to two weeks prior to its administration. This review =may.
take place at the facility or -in the Regional office. The Chief Examiner will. coordinate the details of the review with1 the facility.
An NRC examiner will always be present during the review.
Whenever this option of. examination review is utilized, the facility reviewers will-sign the following statement prior to being allowed access 3
.to'the' examination. 'The examination or written notes will NOT be-irotained by the facility.
4 M.
a.;
Pre-Examination Security Agreement.
l s
t e
- I. acknowledge thatil have acquired specialized knowledge concerning.
'the examination scheduled for at -as of the date of my signature-j
= " >
.below.
Ii; agree that I,will not knowingly: divulge any information l
K!
concerning this examination'to any unauthorized persons.
I: understand Y
!that 1-am not to-participate int any instruction involving those r
y~
l applicants scheduled to be administered the above examination from-this date until after the examination has been administered.: l~
j ifui'ther understand that violation of the-conditions of-this agreement:
I 6%
imay result-in the examination'being cancelled and/or enforcement
. action against myself or the facility licensee by whom I, am employed?
or-repr.esent.
,y Signaturc7Date-In:sddition, the facilitysstaff reviewers.will sign the following 1]
Estatement after the written examination'has'been administered..
^
. ~ Post-Examination Security Agreement ~
b.
o
--;I did:not, to the best of my. knowledge, divulge any.information 1
.concerningi the examinations administered.during the week of' at Lto 1
- any unauthorized persons.
I-did not participate in providing any instruction ~to those: applicants'who were administered the examination.
L from the date'I-entered:into this: security agreement until the bj completion of examination administration.
Q+
Signature /Date 1
i l
'1 1
n am
W f., = 7 k ; - '.
m REQUIREMENTS'F.0R FACILITY REVIE'W 0F WRITTEli EXA!11 NATION (Cont'd) k 2.
LRegardless of whether Se above' examination review option is exercised, imediately following the administration of-the written examination, the
- facility staff shall be provided a marked-up copy of.the examination and the' answer key. The copy of_the written. examination shall include pen and ink changes-made-to questions during the examination administration. -
If: the-facility did not review the: examination prior tolits administration,
.they will have five (5) working days from the day of. the written t
examination to submit formal coments.
If the-facility reviewed the - _.
r 4
' examination prior to'its administration, any additional coments.must be:
5
<given to:an examiner prior to his/her leaving-the site at the end ofcthe-week 'of the written examination administration.
In either case, the Re comments'will be addressed to the responsible Regional Office by the:
F highest onsite. level of_ corporate management for plant operations, e.g.,<
'Vice President for Nuclear Operations.
A copy:of5the submittal.will'be
]
forwarded toithe Chief Examiner, as appropriate.
Coments not submitted ;
p within the required time frame will=be considered for inclusion.in the-D grading process:on a case-by-case basis by the Regional Office Section' l
v Chlef.; Should thei coment submittal-deadline-not be met,1a long delay-lin grading the; examinations.may occur.
j
- 3.
The.following format should be adhered to for submittal of specific'
- coments: :-
4 a.
Listing ofLNRC Question,' answer and reference j
e b.1
, Facility, comment /recomendation i
V
-c..
Reference '(to support facility 'coment) lNOTESi.flh No change ~tb! he exam'ination.will be made without submittal-of-t
-a reference-to support the facility comment...~ Any supporting q L' '
documentation that was.not previously supplied, should be
~ '
provided.
u i
i m
~
n s 2 '..
Comments made without a concise facility recommendation will r
not-be-addressed.
j (4..
A'two-hour post examination review may be held at the discretion-of the-
~~
m Chief Examiner.
If this review is held, the' facility staff should be a
Linformed that only written comments that are properly supported wi_11 be
~
y A considered in the grading offthe examination.
o, 9P i
i I
l( '
q i
.