Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
Results
Other: ML20138H876, ML20138H895, ML20148A525, ML20148A533, ML20155J779, ML20196L189, ML20198Q962, ML20210S227, ML20210V194, ML20215N162, ML20215N167, ML20235Z787, ML20236A065, ML20236R788
|
MONTHYEARML20236A0651975-10-15015 October 1975 Informs of Potential Safety Question Re Design of Reactor Pressure Vessel Support Sys for Pwrs.Util Requested to Review Design Bases to Determine If Transient Loads Taken Into Account & Provide Results to NRC within 30 Days Project stage: Other ML20155J7791976-01-0505 January 1976 Requests Addl Info Re Reactor Vessel Support Design.Info to Be Provided by 760301.W/o Encl Project stage: Other ML20148F2811976-06-0707 June 1976 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Adequacy of Pressure Vessel Supports When Calculating Subcooled Internal Loads Project stage: RAI ML20244A6211978-01-25025 January 1978 Forwards Background & Current Status of Review of Asymmetric LOCA Loads for PWR Facilities & Revised Request for Addl Info on Subj Project stage: RAI ML20151J0531984-06-0606 June 1984 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Asymmetric LOCA Loads. Addl Info Needed in Order to Complete Safety Evaluation of plant-specific LOCA Analysis.Response Requested by 840731 Project stage: Approval ML20138H8951985-06-30030 June 1985 Rev 0 to Leak-Before-Break Evaluation of Reactor Coolant Loop, Final Rept Project stage: Other ML20138H8761985-10-25025 October 1985 Forwards Rev 0 to 01-0300-1395, Leak-Before-Break Evaluation of Reactor Coolant Loop, Final Rept Project stage: Other ML20210S2271986-05-15015 May 1986 Trip Rept of 860510-11 Site Visit to Participate in Licensee Cold Walkdown of Reactor Coolant Loop Piping & Components, Including Supports,To Assess Whether Cause of LER 85-013, Rev 1 Determined Project stage: Other ML20198Q9621986-05-31031 May 1986 PG&E - Trojan - 1986 Snubber Valve Failure Analysis Project stage: Other ML20210V1941986-09-25025 September 1986 Informs of Results of RCS Thermal Expansion Monitoring Performed During Wk of 860902.Measurements Acceptable.Data Will Be Taken When RCS Temp Reaches 340 F,In Lieu of Holding Temp at 340 F for Analysis & Evaluation Project stage: Other ML20235Z7871986-10-15015 October 1986 Discusses Insp on 860318-0428 & Two Special Insps on 860513- 0612 & 860804-14 & Forwards Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty Project stage: Other ML20215N1671986-10-31031 October 1986 Rev 1 to, Leak-Before-Break Evaluation of Reactor Coolant Loop Project stage: Other ML20215N1621986-10-31031 October 1986 Forwards Rev 1 to Impell Corp 01-0300-1395, Leak-Before- Break Evaluation of Reactor Coolant Loop, Final Rept. Analysis Revised to Comply w/NUREG-1061,Vol 3 Project stage: Other ML20236J8741987-08-0404 August 1987 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Util Proposed Application of Leak Before Break Methodology to Eliminate Dynamic Effect of Postulated Primary Loop Pipe Ruptures from Design Basis, Per GDC-4.Response Requested within 30 Days of Ltr Receipt Project stage: RAI ML0311505101987-08-0404 August 1987 Withdrawn NRC Generic Letter 1987-014: Operator Licensing Examinations Project stage: Request ML20238B5121987-08-25025 August 1987 Responds to NRC 870804 Request for Addl Info Re Elimination of Dynamic Effects of Postulated Primary Loop Pipe Ruptures from Design Basis for Facility.Addl Time Will Be Required to Evaluate & Adequately Address Each Item of Request Project stage: Request ML20236R7881987-11-20020 November 1987 Advises That Addl Info Requested in NRC Will Not Be Provided on 871231,per .Util Has Changed Contractors for leak-before-break Analysis in Order to Obtain Clarifications.Submittal Will Be Made by 880130 Project stage: Other ML20148A5331988-03-0303 March 1988 Requests That Proprietary WCAP-11699 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790.Affidavit Encl Project stage: Other ML20148A5251988-03-14014 March 1988 Forwards Proprietary WCAP-11699 & Nonproprietary WCAP-11700, Technical Justification for Eliminating Large Primary Loop Pipe Rupture as Structural Design Basis for Trojan Plant, leak-before-break Analysis Final Repts Project stage: Other ML20196L1891988-06-29029 June 1988 Advises That Proprietary WCAP-11699 Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure (Ref 10CFR2.790),per 880314 Request Project stage: Other ML20151T4041988-08-0505 August 1988 Forwards Safety Evaluation Supporting Elimination of Postulated Primary Loop Pipe Ruptures from Design Basis for Facility,Per Util 851025 & 861031 leak-before-break Evaluations & WCAP-11699 Project stage: Approval 1986-05-15
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217E9711999-10-13013 October 1999 Submits Notification of Major Changes to Trojan Liquid Radioactive Waste Treatment Sys,Iaw PGE-1201.Detailed Description of Change Provided ML20217C8171999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Notice of Receipt of Availability for Comment & Meeting to Discuss License Termination Plan,Per 990805 Application ML20216F7621999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards Corrected Response to Request 2 Contained in NRC 990920 RAI Re Application of Pacificorp for Transfer of License NPF-1.Response 2 Should Have Stated That Na General Partnership Is Partnership Formed in Nv ML20216F2871999-09-20020 September 1999 Informs NRC of Developments That Have Occurred Since 990524 Application Was Filed Re Pacificorp Transfer of License of FOL NPF-1.NRC Is Urged to Act & Approve Transaction Expeditiously by 990930.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20211Q3281999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/99-06 on 990630-0701,21 & 0408-08. No Violations Noted.Insp Conducted to Review Decommissioning Activities Underway at Trojan Site & to Accompany Shipment of Reactor Vessel to Hanford,Washington for Burial ML20211J2101999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application for Approval of Proposed Corporate Merger of Pacificorp & Scottishpower ML20211B6611999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data Rept for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211B4091999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Environ Assessment & Finding No Significant Impact to Application for an Exemption & License Amend Dated 980129.Proposed Exemption & License Amend Would Delete Security Plan Requirements of 10CFR50.54(p) & 10CFR73.55 ML20211A7131999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact to Application for Exemption & License Amend Dtd 980827.Proposed Exemption & License Amend Would Delete EP Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & 10CFR50,app E ML20210R7691999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards Proposed Rev 23 to PGE-8010, Trojan Nuclear QAP, in Response to NRC 990708 RAI Re Relocation of TS ACs to Qap.Revised QAP Will Be Made Effective Concurrently with Implementation of License Change Application Lca 245 ML20210H5971999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Notice of Consideration of Approval of Application Re Merger & Opportunity for Hearing.Notice Being Forwarded to Ofc of Fr for Publication ML20216D6611999-07-23023 July 1999 Submits Summary of Proprietary Submittals for Transtor Part 71 & Part 72 & Trojan ISFSI Applications ML20210F8601999-07-22022 July 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to PGE-1076, Trojan Reactor Vessel Package Sar. Changes to Rept Contained in Rev 1 Received NRC Approval by Ltr ML20210A6401999-07-19019 July 1999 Corrects Ref in Item 4 of Which Constitutes Rev 2 of Authorization from Wf Kane, for Trojan Reactor Vessel Package as Approved Package for Shipment Under General License,Subj to Listed Conditions ML20210B4481999-07-12012 July 1999 Forwards Rept Describing Effects of Earthquake That Occurred on 990702 Near Satsop,Wa,Iaw Trojan Nuclear Plant Defueled Sar,Section 4.1.3.1 ML20209D6231999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re Licensee 980827 Request for Amend That Would Delete Number of License Conditions & TS Requirements That Would Be Implemented After All Sf Has Been Removed from 10CFR50 Licensed Area.Response Requested within 30 Days ML20209C6481999-07-0606 July 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Defueled Sar,Including Changes Since Last Submittal.Attachment Includes Brief Description of Each Change Included in Rev ML20209B7821999-07-0101 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990609 RAI Re License Change Application 244 & Accompanying Request for Exemption.Detailed Info Supports Estimation of Remaining Radioactive Matl Previously Provided by Licensee ML20212J3281999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Amend 22 to PGE-1012, Trojan Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Plan, IAW 10CFR50.48(f).Amend Reflects Revs Made During Decommissioning Activities & Does Not Reduce Effectiveness of Fire Protection ML20195J0111999-06-0909 June 1999 Responds to Requesting License & Exemption Re Emergency Preparedness ML20207D3861999-06-0101 June 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to PGE-1077, Trojan Nuclear Plant Reactor Vessel & Internals Removal Project Transportation Safety Plan ML20196L1251999-05-24024 May 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License NPF-1 for Indirect Transfer of License,To Extent That Such Approval Required Solely to Reflect Change in Upstream Economic Ownership of Pacificorp ML20207A2751999-05-14014 May 1999 Informs That NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Reorganized Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization, Division of Licensing Project Mgt Created.Organization Chart Encl ML20206N9411999-05-11011 May 1999 Forwards Revised Epips,Including Rev 7 to EPIP 3, Response Organization Checklists & Rev 9 to EPIP 5, Emergency Preparedness Test Propgram. Changes to EPIPs 3 & 5 Ref New Owners of on-site Railroad Line,Portland & Western Railroad ML20206J8681999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/99-05 & 72-0017/99-04 on 990419-22.No Violations Noted.Insp Observed Work Activities Associated with Lifting of Reactor Vessel in Preparation for Removal & Shipment to Hanford Reservation for Burial ML20206J7931999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/99-04 & 72-0017/99-02 on 990322- 25 & 29-0408.One Violations Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violation,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20206H4331999-05-0505 May 1999 Forwards Amend 201 to License NPF-1 & Se.Amend Revises PDTSs by Deleting ISFSI Area,Revises Subsection 4.1.1,replaces Figure 4.1-1 with New Figure 4.1-1 & Adds New Page to Figure 4.1-1 to Reflect Access Control (ISFSI) Area ML20206N1571999-05-0404 May 1999 Forwards Util Quarterly Decommissioning Status Rept for First Quarter of 1999,IAW State of or Energy Facility Siting Council Order Approving Trojan Decommissioning Plan, ML20206E1731999-04-29029 April 1999 Informs That NRC Staff Has Performed an Acceptance Review of Trojan Nuclear Plant License Termination Plan,Submitted by ,To Determine Whether LTP Provides Adequate Info to Allow Staff to Conduct Detailed Review ML20206E0211999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 970212 Application for Amend.Proposed Amend Would Revise Trojan Permanently Defueled TS to Delete ISFSI Area ML20206C9591999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards Amend 200 to License NPF-1 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Changes License NPF-1 by Revising License Condition 2.C.(10), Loading of Fuel Into Casks in Fuel Building ML20206C9221999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards Amend 199 to License NPF-1 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Changes License NPF-1 by Adding New License Condition Entitled, Loading of Fuel Into Casks in Fuel Building ML20205S9761999-04-21021 April 1999 Forwards Trojan Nuclear Plant,Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept for CY98. Rept Submitted in Accordance with Trojan Permanently Defueled TS 5.8.1.2 & Sections IV.B.2, IV.B.3 & Iv.C of App I to Title 10CFR50 ML20205T5471999-04-20020 April 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/99-03 & 72-0017/99-03 on 990301-04,15-18 & 22-25.No Violations Noted ML20205N9061999-04-13013 April 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/99-02 on 990329-0401.No Violations Noted.Inspectors Examined Portions of Physical Security, Access Authorization & FFD Programs ML20205P7301999-04-0808 April 1999 Forwards PGE-1009-98, Operational Ecological Monitoring Program for TNP,Jan-Dec 1998, Including All Existing non-radiological Effluents ML20205B3661999-03-25025 March 1999 Transmits Completed Application for Renewal of NPDES Permit for Trojan Nuclear Plant,Iaw License NPF-1,App B,Epp,Section 3.2 ML20204G1781999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards Rev 4 to PGE-1063, Suppl to Applicants Environ Rept - Post Operating License Stage ML20204B7551999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards Updated TS 5.6 Re High Radiation Area,Per Telcons with Nrc.Justification for TS Was Provided Previously with Util Ltr Dtd 990317,but Has Been Updated & Is Included as Encl 2 ML20204C5151999-03-17017 March 1999 Forwards Licensee Comments on NRC Preliminary SER & License Re Trojan Isfsi.Encl Includes Justification for Inclusion in ISFSI TS of Alternative Method to 10CFR20.1601(c) for Controlling Access to High Radiation Areas ML20207J3721999-03-10010 March 1999 Forwards License Amend Application 247 Requesting Amend to License NPF-1 to Add License Condition Denoting NRC Approval of PGE-1078, Trojan Nuclear Plant License Termination Plan, Also Encl.With Certificate of Svc ML20207L0011999-03-0808 March 1999 Transmits Tnp co-owners Annual Rept of Status of Decommissioning Funding for Tnp.Rept Is Based on Most Recent Analysis of Tnp Decommissioning Estimate & Funding Plan,Per Rev 6 to Pge, Tnp Decommissioning Plan ML20207G9691999-03-0303 March 1999 Forwards Rev 6 to PGE-1061, Trojan Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Plan. Summary of Changes,Attached.Revised Portions Denoted by Side Bars ML20207D7751999-03-0202 March 1999 Forwards Amend 21 to PGE-1012, Trojan Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Plan, Per 10CFR50.48(f).Amend Reflects Revs Made During Decommissioning Activities ML20207B0441999-02-24024 February 1999 Forwards Endorsements 139 to Nelia Policy NF-0225 & 2 to Nelia Policy NW-0602 ML20207J0701999-02-11011 February 1999 Forwards Proposed Ts,Update to ISFSI SAR & Revised Calculation,Per Application for Trojan ISFSI License ML20202G4291999-02-0202 February 1999 Forwards Rev 0 to PGE-1076, Trojan Reactor Vessel Package Sar. Approval,With Certain Conditions,For one-time Shipment of Trojan Reactor Vessel Package Granted by Commission Via Ltr ML20202G0931999-01-26026 January 1999 Submits Following Info That Will Be Needed for NRC Staff to Complete Review & Issue Trojan ISFSI License,As Result of 990121 Meeting with NRC Following Insp & Observation of ISFSI Preoperational Testing During Wk of 990118 ML20202F2551999-01-25025 January 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Rept for July-Dec 1998 ML20202C1621999-01-21021 January 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/98-04 & 72-0017/98-01 & NOV Re Inadequate Actions Taken by Radiation Protection Technician to Ensure That Radiological Conditions Safe Prior to Removing Warning Signs for Airborne Radioactivity Area 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:NRC TO UTILITY
MONTHYEARML20062F9241990-11-0808 November 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/90-29 on 900902-1006 & Notice of Violation ML20058F3761990-11-0101 November 1990 Ack Receipt of Re Corrective Actions Taken in Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/90-23 ML20058A3231990-10-12012 October 1990 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/90-20 ML20058B6381990-10-12012 October 1990 Forwards Revised Section 1, Persons Contacted of Insp Rept 50-344/90-20,correcting Errors in Personnel & Positions ML20059M6981990-09-25025 September 1990 Ack Receipt of in Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/90-21 ML20059M1941990-09-18018 September 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/90-25 on 900820-24.No Violations Noted ML20059L1711990-09-18018 September 1990 Provides Info Re Gfes of Operator Licensing Written Exam to Be Administered on 901010.W/o Encls ML20059F5331990-09-0707 September 1990 Ack Receipt of 900828 Response to NRC 900801 Request for Info Re FEMA Observations of 891115 Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Corrective Actions Described in Util Response Will Be Verified & Followed Through Routine Insp Program ML20059E8501990-09-0606 September 1990 Forwards Enforcement Conference Rept 50-344/90-26 on 900830. NRC Concludes That Corrective Actions Discussed Should Improve Plant Performance ML20059D5231990-08-30030 August 1990 Informs That Util Responses to Generic Ltr 88-14, Instrument Air Supply Sys Problems Affecting Safety-Related Equipment Confirms That All Requirements Completed & Implemented ML20059D0971990-08-30030 August 1990 Forwards SER Accepting Util 880311,0401 & 1223 & 900319 & 0622 Responses to NRC Bulletin 88-002, Rapidly Propagating Fatigue Cracks in Steam Generator Tubes ML20059D0951990-08-30030 August 1990 Advises That Util 900126 Response to NRC Bulletin 89-003, Potential Loss of Required Shutdown Margin During Refueling Operations, Acceptable & Review Concluded ML20059D3071990-08-29029 August 1990 Forwards Exam Rept 50-344/OL-90-03 Administered on 900717-19 & 23.All But One Initial Reactor Operator Passed Exam.Operating Portion of Initial Licensing Exam Revealed Some Generic Training Weaknesses ML20059C7801990-08-27027 August 1990 Forwards Amend 162 to License NPF-1 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises Tech Spec 3/4.6.1, Containment Integrity ML20056B2511990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 50-344/90-23 on 900719-0817. Violation Noted But Not Cited.Characterization of Apparent Violation in Insp Rept May Change as Result of Further NRC Review.Enforcement Conference Scheduled for 900830 ML20059A6991990-08-17017 August 1990 Advises That Util 900119 Program Description Including Positions on Static Testing to Ensure Proper Switch Settings & motor-operated Valve Problem Trending Schedules May Be Reviewed During Possible Further NRC Insp ML20059C1951990-08-16016 August 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/90-21 on 900609-0721.Violations Noted.W/O Notice of Violation ML20056B2421990-08-15015 August 1990 Advises That 900712 & 31 Responses to SALP Rept 50-344/90-09 Appropriate.Page 18 of Initial Rept Changed to Relect Effort by Util Engineering Groups in Design of ATWS Mitigation Sys Actuation Circuitry,Per 900615 Board Meeting ML20056A5141990-08-0303 August 1990 Advises That Response to NRC Bulletin 88-010, Molded Case Circuit Breakers, Complete,Per 890331,0414,0725 & s.If Subsequent Insp Identifies Deficiencies in Actions & Responses,Issue Will Be Reopened ML20058L4401990-08-0202 August 1990 Forwards Corrected Amend 161 to License NPF-1,revising Items 6.4.1 & 6.4.2 Re Administrative Controls ML20058L5501990-08-0202 August 1990 Forwards Safety Evaluation Concluding That Instrumented Ammonia Detection Unnecessary for Protection of Control Room Personnel Based on Review of Submittals ML20056A6231990-08-0101 August 1990 Forwards FEMA Rept Re Observation of Offsite Activities During Plant Emergency Preparedness Exercise on 891115.NRC Understands That FEMA Rept for 900724,remedial Drill Will Close Five Deficiencies.W/O Encls ML20059A4011990-08-0101 August 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/90-17 on 900604-07.No Violations or Deviations Noted IR 05000344/19900111990-07-27027 July 1990 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/90-11 ML20056A0471990-07-20020 July 1990 Forwards SALP Mgt Meeting Insp Rept 50-344/90-22 on 900615 ML20055H3211990-07-13013 July 1990 Advises That 900330 & 0504 Amend 22 to Radiological Emergency Plan Meets 10CFR50.54(q) Requirements & Acceptable ML20055H5671990-07-11011 July 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/90-19 on 900611-15 & Notice of Violation IR 05000344/19900181990-07-10010 July 1990 Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 50-344/90-18 on 900625-29.No Violations Noted.Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(d)) ML20055E7851990-07-0909 July 1990 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Procedures Generation Program for Plant,Per Util 831110 & s.Ltrs Should Be Reviewed to Address Programmatic Improvements Outlined in Section 2 of Rept ML20055G6311990-07-0606 July 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/90-16 on 900506-0609.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20055E4061990-07-0303 July 1990 Discusses 900630 Submittal Re Reduced Measured Min RCS Flow for Plant.New Measured Min Flow Limit for RCS Flow Will Be Reflected in Proposed Change to Tech Specs to Be Submitted by 900713 ML20055C7481990-06-18018 June 1990 Forwards Amend 161 to License NPF-1 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Changes Qualification Requirements,As Specified in Tech Spec 6.3.1,that Must Be Met by Radiation Protection Manager ML20059M8941990-06-13013 June 1990 Forwards NRC Performance Indicators for First Quarter 1990. W/O Encl ML20055C3881990-02-12012 February 1990 Forwards Mgt Meeting Rept 50-344/90-01 on 900112.Licensee Must Thoroughly Follow Through on Implementation of Improvement Plans & Place High Priority on Assuring That Personnel Understands Goals & Objectives IR 05000344/19890121989-09-27027 September 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/89-12.Contested Violation Re Interpretation of SNT-TC-1A Requirements Will Be Further Examined ML20248A8601989-09-27027 September 1989 Ack Receipt of 890828 & 0923 Responses to NRC 890727 Notice of Violation.Nrc Notes That Licensee Did Not Ack Violation B Re Proficiency of Security Officers in Use of Assigned Weapons ML20248D3331989-09-25025 September 1989 Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-78,reflecting Changes to 10CFR140,effective 890701 IR 05000344/19890181989-09-25025 September 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/89-18 ML20248B7751989-09-19019 September 1989 Submits Info Re Generic Fundamentals Exam Section of Operator Licensing Written Exam to Be Administered 891004 & Forwards Map Describing Location of Exam & Other Info.W/O Encls IR 05000344/19890171989-09-12012 September 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/89-17 on 890618-0729 & Notice of Violation.Insp Identified That ESF Components Had Been Operated Outside Normal Design Limits ML20247H7401989-09-0101 September 1989 Forwards Enforcement Conference Rept 50-344/89-22 on 890824 Re Containment Recirculation Sump Debris & Design Problems ML20246N7881989-08-31031 August 1989 Informs That 880420 Rev 20 to Physical Security Plan Partially Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p).Trash Rack Functioning as Protected Area & Vital Area Barrier Unacceptable ML20247C1431989-08-29029 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/89-09 on 890522-0609 & 0719-21 & Notice of Violation.Licensee Generally Implemented Committed Programs to Enhance Understanding & Implementation of Plant Design Basis ML20246D8121989-08-21021 August 1989 Confirms 890821 Telcon Between Ae Chaffee & Td Walt Re Mgt Meeting/Enforcement Conference on 890824 at Plant to Discuss Insp Findings as Documented in Insp Rept 50-344/89-19 ML20246H9561989-08-15015 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/89-19 on 890712-0808.Violations Noted.Insp Findings Indicate That Util Mgt Oversight of Plant Activities Associated W/Sump Have Been Ineffective ML20245H3601989-08-10010 August 1989 Forwards Corrected Page to Amend 152 Issued to License NPF-1 on 890515 IR 05000344/19890141989-08-0707 August 1989 Ack Receipt of 890707 & 28 Ltrs Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/89-14. Handwritten Notes Encl ML20245L1301989-08-0404 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/89-12 on 890522-0601 & Notice of Violation.Insp Determined That Inservice Contractor & Licensee Oversight of Contractor Activities Need Significant Improvement ML20245K2541989-08-0303 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/89-18 on 890712-14 & Notice of Violation.Nrc Views Util Handling of Hydrogen Issues as Missed Opportunities to Focus on & Resolve long-standing & Potentially Significant Safety Issue 1990-09-07
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217C8171999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Notice of Receipt of Availability for Comment & Meeting to Discuss License Termination Plan,Per 990805 Application ML20211Q3281999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/99-06 on 990630-0701,21 & 0408-08. No Violations Noted.Insp Conducted to Review Decommissioning Activities Underway at Trojan Site & to Accompany Shipment of Reactor Vessel to Hanford,Washington for Burial ML20211J2101999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application for Approval of Proposed Corporate Merger of Pacificorp & Scottishpower ML20211A7131999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact to Application for Exemption & License Amend Dtd 980827.Proposed Exemption & License Amend Would Delete EP Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & 10CFR50,app E ML20211B4091999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Environ Assessment & Finding No Significant Impact to Application for an Exemption & License Amend Dated 980129.Proposed Exemption & License Amend Would Delete Security Plan Requirements of 10CFR50.54(p) & 10CFR73.55 ML20210H5971999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Notice of Consideration of Approval of Application Re Merger & Opportunity for Hearing.Notice Being Forwarded to Ofc of Fr for Publication ML20210A6401999-07-19019 July 1999 Corrects Ref in Item 4 of Which Constitutes Rev 2 of Authorization from Wf Kane, for Trojan Reactor Vessel Package as Approved Package for Shipment Under General License,Subj to Listed Conditions ML20209D6231999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re Licensee 980827 Request for Amend That Would Delete Number of License Conditions & TS Requirements That Would Be Implemented After All Sf Has Been Removed from 10CFR50 Licensed Area.Response Requested within 30 Days ML20195J0111999-06-0909 June 1999 Responds to Requesting License & Exemption Re Emergency Preparedness ML20207A2751999-05-14014 May 1999 Informs That NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Reorganized Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization, Division of Licensing Project Mgt Created.Organization Chart Encl ML20206J7931999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/99-04 & 72-0017/99-02 on 990322- 25 & 29-0408.One Violations Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violation,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20206J8681999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/99-05 & 72-0017/99-04 on 990419-22.No Violations Noted.Insp Observed Work Activities Associated with Lifting of Reactor Vessel in Preparation for Removal & Shipment to Hanford Reservation for Burial ML20206H4331999-05-0505 May 1999 Forwards Amend 201 to License NPF-1 & Se.Amend Revises PDTSs by Deleting ISFSI Area,Revises Subsection 4.1.1,replaces Figure 4.1-1 with New Figure 4.1-1 & Adds New Page to Figure 4.1-1 to Reflect Access Control (ISFSI) Area ML20206E1731999-04-29029 April 1999 Informs That NRC Staff Has Performed an Acceptance Review of Trojan Nuclear Plant License Termination Plan,Submitted by ,To Determine Whether LTP Provides Adequate Info to Allow Staff to Conduct Detailed Review ML20206E0211999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 970212 Application for Amend.Proposed Amend Would Revise Trojan Permanently Defueled TS to Delete ISFSI Area ML20206C9221999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards Amend 199 to License NPF-1 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Changes License NPF-1 by Adding New License Condition Entitled, Loading of Fuel Into Casks in Fuel Building ML20206C9591999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards Amend 200 to License NPF-1 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Changes License NPF-1 by Revising License Condition 2.C.(10), Loading of Fuel Into Casks in Fuel Building ML20205T5471999-04-20020 April 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/99-03 & 72-0017/99-03 on 990301-04,15-18 & 22-25.No Violations Noted ML20205N9061999-04-13013 April 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/99-02 on 990329-0401.No Violations Noted.Inspectors Examined Portions of Physical Security, Access Authorization & FFD Programs ML20202C1621999-01-21021 January 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-344/98-04 & 72-0017/98-01 & NOV Re Inadequate Actions Taken by Radiation Protection Technician to Ensure That Radiological Conditions Safe Prior to Removing Warning Signs for Airborne Radioactivity Area ML20198E9871998-12-21021 December 1998 Informs That NRC Staff Acks Delay & Understands Bnfl Fuel Solutions Will Submit Revised Schedule for Responding to Second Transtor Shipping Cask RAI No Later than 981231. Current Schedule Last Updated on 981030 ML20198S1661998-12-17017 December 1998 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records Encl & Identified in App C & D.App E Records Withheld in Part & App F Records Withheld in Entirety (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) & App G Records Withheld in Entirety (Ref FOIA Exemptions 4 & 5) ML20195D9471998-11-0404 November 1998 Informs of NRC Final Decision on Portland General Electric Co Request for Approval of one-time Shipment of Decommissioned Rv Package from Trojan Nuclear Power Plant Near Richland,Wa.Commission Approved Request on 981022 ML20155F6471998-11-0202 November 1998 Informs of NRC Final Decision on Portland General Electric Co Request for Approval of one-time Shipment of Decommissioned Rv Package from Tnp Near Ranier,Or to Disposal Site at Hanford Nuclear Reservation ML20155G7371998-10-30030 October 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/98-202 on 980831-0903. No Violations Noted.Insp Program Covered Maint Program, Safety Review Program & Follow Up on Previous Inspector Follow Items Re Modular Sf Cooling Sys ML20155E0491998-10-29029 October 1998 Forwards SER Granting Two Specific Exemptions Under 10CFR71.8 for Approval of Trojan Reactor Vessel Package for one-time Shipment to Us Ecology Disposal Facility Near Richland,Wa ML20155H0171998-10-29029 October 1998 Informs of Us NRC Final Decision on Poge Request for Approval of one-time Shipment of Decommissioned Reactor Vessel Package from Trojan Nuclear Power Plant,To Disposal Site at Hanford Nuclear Reservation,Near Richland.Wa ML20155F6001998-10-29029 October 1998 Informs of NRC Final Decision on Portland General Electric Co Request for Approval of one-time Shipment of Decommissioned Rv Package from Plant Near Ranier,Or Disposal Site at Hanford Nuclear Reservation ML20151Z6461998-09-17017 September 1998 Refers to Insp Rept 50-344/98-02 Issued on 980701 Re Modular Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Sys.Info Provided in Re New Spent Fuel Pool Sys Reviewed.Insp 50-344/98-03 & 50-344/98-202 Also Included Reviews of Sys Design & Testing ML20151Y8761998-09-11011 September 1998 Responds to Re NRC Efforts on Review Activities for Proposed one-time Shipment of Trojan Reactor Vessel,For Disposal.Nrc decision-making Process Acting in Parrallel & in Concert with Other Necessary Approvals ML20237F1281998-08-27027 August 1998 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards App a Records Already Available in Pdr.App B Records Being Made Available in PDR ML20237E5781998-08-25025 August 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/98-03 on 980727-30.No Violations Noted ML20237B4271998-08-14014 August 1998 Expresses Appreciation for Contribution to NRC Public Meeting Held in Kelso,Wa on 980730 Re Proposed One Time Shipment of Trojan Decommissioned Rv for Disposal ML20237A4101998-08-11011 August 1998 Forwards RAI Re Plant Request for Amend to Support Repowering Site W/Natural Gas Fired,Combined Cycle Turbines. Response Requested to Be Provided within 60 Days of Date of Ltr ML20236T5651998-07-21021 July 1998 Responds to to Chairman Jackson Expressing Concern W/Nrc Schedules for Reviewing Portland General Electric Co Applications for on-site Sf Storage & for one-time Shipment of Reactor Vessel ML20236G9671998-07-0101 July 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/98-02 on 980601-04.No Violations Noted.Plans to Replace Existing Spent Fuel cooling,make-up Water & clean-up Sys W/New Self Contained Sys Were Discussed W/Staff ML20249B8581998-06-18018 June 1998 Informs That Tj Kobetz Has Assumed Project Management Responsbilities for Proposed Trojan Isfsi.Communications W/ NRC Should Be Directed to Tj Kobetz.Written Correspondence Should Continue to Go DCD ML20247N6681998-05-22022 May 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/98-01 on 980504-07.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Physical Security Program ML20217L0571998-04-29029 April 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/98-201 on 980223-26.No Violations Noted.Specific Areas Examined Included Training & Certification of Qualified Evaluators,Independent Reviewers & Independent Safety Reviewers;Procedural Controls IR 05000344/19970051998-03-25025 March 1998 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/97-05.Actions Will Be Reviewed During Future Insp to Determine That Full Compliance Has Been Achieved & Will Be Maintained ML20217A5491998-03-18018 March 1998 Submits Update on Actions Taken by NRC Since 970613 Response Re Portland General Electric Co Request for Approval of 1-time Shipment of Decommissioned Reactor Vessel.Two Issues Identified for Review in Utility Request,Submitted ML20217A4221998-03-11011 March 1998 Submits Update on Actions Taken by NRC Since 970613 Response Re Portland General Electric Co Request for Approval of one-time Shipment of Decommissioned Reactor Vessel.Two Issues for Review in Utility Request Submitted ML20202J0741998-02-18018 February 1998 Grants Request for Extension of Response to NOV in Insp Rept 50-344/97-05.New Response Deadline 980317 ML20203A9061998-02-18018 February 1998 Informs of 980209 Meeting W/Poge in Region IV to Discuss Proposed Changes to Security Provisions for Protected Area at Plant.List of Attendees & Handouts Provided by Util Encl ML20202C1791998-02-0909 February 1998 Returns Responses to 970731 RAI-2 Re 960326 Application for Trojan Isfsi,Due to Overall Poor Quality.Proprietary Documents Are Being Returned Under Separate Cover as Required Affidavits Were Not Provided ML20203F4661998-01-30030 January 1998 Requests That Staff Ask Us Ecology,In Coordination W/Portland General Electric Co,To Perform Comprehensive & Defensible Pathways Analysis to Demonstrate Suitability of Proposed Wastes for Disposal at Hanford Disposal Site ML20199D7481998-01-23023 January 1998 Forwards Omitted Cover Page for Insp Rept 50-344/97-05 on 971201-03 ML20199F0021998-01-23023 January 1998 Forwards Omitted Page of Insp Rept 50-344/97-05 ML20199F0241998-01-15015 January 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/97-05 on 971201-03 & Notice of Violation.Areas Reviewed as Part of Insp Included;Sfp TS Compliance,Cold Weather Preparations,Results of 1997 Emergency Exercise & Followup on Notification to NRC ML20198F7411998-01-0707 January 1998 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/97-03. Implementation of Corrective Actions Will Be Reviewed During Future Insp to Determine That Compliance Achieved 1999-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
. . . . . _ _ _ . .
d ,.__ ,. g
. os 6 1)iktribut Le t: .
Tjocke t M .l e J. Cutc.hir,f.' M " .'
O ., t '. l 3 6 yg'n". liRC PDR Local PDR ACits T.LD L'
LGH 1-2 File in M. Rushbroch TIC
~ ed < t * 'a : r; e t R. C. DeYoune It . Klecker M . Will .i t,< ".
1 e
i 413,
.* y-- = ,. ,,(
h '*
g $
r
! >< -1 1, 7 ,
? , . - . ., 7, r g ,
y a a e e i s ), 5[ c 1
e *T-* P
f ,
s
f s s
+I { Y
. ** f?
1*
p g ry e.
t f.}, , , , g ., ., . -je s
-t<, rr .{c . .., ..
s- ; -
yg- g. g,
,. * , er _
4
, 3 t vc - 6 r. .
, + r ,, g L L - t 1. J, S l~
j '
,e
- l- 4.,' f I.
is ) !l !f i
,s, ' v i < g 9 ] N *y , ,
.,i ?6 s.' i \ r -
's. *
- t. '
, te ,- ?* .. .. g 1
> - ) ,- i 4, -
$ ' ' t
)1- l -
's :, ,, ,
i >
r - ,-,(
' ~
. e
, i' ,
' ' ** : i 6
, , , ,..-.; ) .:
r
~
O
" ~ -
~ ~ ~ s - ; - .
. c ,v. . i 4 ,, i
- 9 ,
'J i,
. . t Y[ g e g
(- e 7 1, ,
t !
.' .g,2* .*
t .
p 3 . .
4 k y {
y 'y ^"f*[h
.( > }
g..
' i * '
[' l' , r *
{, r e
+>
t t '
e 4 ,
cH in 6
- r, '
r
- 1
- i- , ' '
i' .t , v -i r
..l.1
.i .,,
mr's{' - i ., ,. g 9 ,
' l' * ) .' ;<'- ; y r p , t}' e -
-llt ,
9 +,
c -~ . i
- ( , t ' .. .
, }{'
( ; E .- l F a s 4 .
g
/
)
5 J r I k4 1
, s
?,..
' " ': $ 'I \ i ? c t-6 5
i t' v. , .T , . ,
- r. s , , , < , ,
i'.t l
,- y 1, i ,
1 f y , G
. , . p. .
i - a .,
j
~ - - - - - - . . . . .m.. .m._.,_,,, _,,,, ,_ __ ,
e.ee+q9
'I' }
?-{
B71021037B 751015 fDR ADOCK 05000344-o ...,c PDR '
n s s c .s
__l. ._ __ zu
.~ ~-
..n.(rr t w. : ; i y y ,\.,.
.t . v. . t. ---- - -- ~. -,- - - -.-. _ ._.. ,
o( . , e .< t s t p s .s g o , g e j 7,,py,g ,
A
, 1 .
4 - -
.{ w rIor OJl $ D hl)
O
(' . irr. i1,' ir9 tr c.' tb rrri'u e' ' > >a r 1.- . J t ' j r - - s,
- e. o ,, .r....c', er.
i- <
r r , 're - ,
ti ,, :
! .- ty,, i, ,.7'_..g,
...,1 1
r- r._ .
s .' -s- , t. . 1',n '-
t o> u.',n ( c..
- ~1-(r ,n r re t ir t , ! . :- .
t-
- n. . c: > >- , . . , ,. ;
- i. r ,t ,
. . b. '
r > > . a re ,,
. r* , w'- +, ,:.. . . . - , . . , . .. i I.8 . k. 9 , , ,,, ,* ,r \.
( * }-g 4 .
4- 1 e g s
- h. m e t.' 7,, - > <- i t ), t'- - . . . . . , .; , ,_ .
>2 c ? r <9 - ., :
,c . c ' -i , _ -, a~;< s si f .,. .; ,, ( .. t. ,
r .c r .
,w
..,.,,y
.) p 5
-+ ; ) g 7 77, rc - r . 4 : + r c ontjc-- : .
,. g , ,
, c; 3y, . n. , ,
. .3,, .
f e, ir rec. -
s 1 5- < re .-2,.
1s ,
,.i r f'
+-
t
'v
( 1 <.,t e+
,,1,
' a t + +
-g
, .4 ( ,* 1 , 3r c . , , , c.. ,.,- , , . n ,,,..
-t Le ii,3<.r1 . 4., ,
1
.g' . , , m - 3 1.,,
v -
, ,La ,
,s . , , ,
T4' , v. 4 : t y1 i, .
' .i - , : ( rt; t- .
i
, n,,...s. .
O f 9
{, . . ,-),
} i.f 1
. , , 9
,! 1. i-f
' i <
-4t. I' ,
1 .
s 1 L < i < , , , , ,
,, t
. pre 1, 3- , i, f.
.A n.
'i' \( t l
-t , i , ,
7 ,-g , ,
. _ . _ _ _ . . . __ 2. _ :_ . m . _. n . .. , _
i4 O < r r,<. , -
LVR 1-?'-i J J.~
,~ LD. .: 1. t .. ,2 ,.; -)
A JCutchin/LLM
,. . m . . . .s UnBu t l e n. \ '
c , .n >
, 10/i."/75 30/!6/75 t 5 8 . I. L' g 4' d'ok
pr h V Fi e D'f f N 1 {. F f ?! 4 f
1 ? 3 3 . 2 4. ! & C
INCLU UI'E O
STATDM!r CF TIE FFOElfM l
Jn the un}ikely cwnt cf a IW primary coo 30nt nyc t ern pi r:e t upt u re in t he l
irrediate vicini ty of t h" react or vesw), transient Jen& oticinatina fro.T three principa.1 causes will le c>:erted on the reactor verrel suppert systcr?.
There are:
3: B]owdown iet fotcer at the location of the r upture freaction forces),.
- 2. Transient diffctrutial'pressuren in the annular rcaien between the veccel and the rhicld, rod -
- 3. Trancient' di f fc i ent ia] prcrcurce actorn the core Fert e.1 within the' reacter VCGre].
The blenlown vt lcr ec t are eda!uat ely understoc-0 cnd derjon preceriot er cre avai)chio to acccunt f cr t her'. I?oth of thc "diffcrcntic) prercure" forcec, houtver, are threr-Sirc.nciona] and tire dependent and troujre rephisticatcd ana)yt ical precWrc 5 to trcns) ate than into .lo 9r actina en t h., t eactor vermi ruppert-< 'tc r. 111 of the 10:e are rcr~j st ed 1 y th inertic rnd by the nuj port r o:! o r coS rentraints or otha co;;ponente of the primary coolDill CyS t 01: jrJ3udi!d tht rei,Clor J>Fer ';ure \ CCre) D'll'er t S .
O The trennient dif ferert ial .premrure r.ctira externally en ll., reactor verre) in a rero)t of !);c f 3cv of the b]cwM : effluent in (bc reect or cavi t.y. 'lh e rrcor i t ufo enM tI c t i: ' dep.ndonce cf the terultina forca deren^ on tfe nat ure ind tbc o;' of the pij r rupt ure, the clearener l eh:cc n the ,ver rel aid the rhield m t!r ria cod locet ien of tl.e vent r;rniras )cadina frer Ll e cavity to t!.c centeitrent er a whole. Fot reme t ir e i c f. ired enc lyt ica L rret hcds have I ccn evai li ble ior calculet ino t.hese trei-rient. di f f crent j a) prerCurrO (rul l i-r f'N' rnial vres) . 'iPe result s of ruch envlyrcr' irdiccre t hP t' tlO COP 0 eG Uc n t 1D2'S en ll.e venFPl Support CyHtcU c03 Cull't.Dd l'y 3 cro sophisticated netFu rcy not 'e c as cencervative cP orioirolly inten& d for earlier deninnc. 7ttechrert 1 to this enclosure previder Ier ycur inforrraticn a lirt of infor M icP IT oucrte for which rcrponrer cou]d tx reedcd fer a proper essencrent cf the inpact of the cevity dif ferentiel prercure en the desion tocauccy cf the vencel support cysten for a pov:er plant.
i O- .
for derien purpocer, however, ePrect in typical caser O . 9he to rccontrolliry tne cere sorrci.
1c000 '<s th the soterno, airecroot ie1 nrrvcorec ecr o=r
<>to=e c rociet<a ne irterne11y ce,ceree<a 3ccdn ere due to e cocentery diffCrent10} preErcrr UhiC!! Ir Ca.lCulOlCd to 0XiCl OCTOEU t.l.e Core l'ar rel I when t he orernure in t.he reactor annular reoion betreen ti e core l'arre]
and verrel vall ir, the vicinity of tJw ruptured pipe ir rFruved to rapidly decrerne to th: Faturation pressort of the pritrary cco.1/nt due to the outf]ow of water. Althcunh tl e deprccrurization vo /c trave.1D repidJy croond the eOre 10rre], llRre 1:. P f j ni l.D periO3 ef tire during WhiCll thO pref'Eure in i thr enrolar r< cier er r:o:ite the ! rerd: JocalJon .ic actuacd to rercin at, or. 1 nChr, lho Or$0inal rCTCtcr Operality! p ref:Su l e . Th u'3, t rFurient PflyrT5etriCf.)
for ces el e everted en the core berrel tnd the versel we)) which ult ie ntely reru.l t in ttanniert ]ccdr co the ':Urport syct ers. Thece are t.he load which WCI C urderefit iF O!( O Fy t h*.' 3 5 C(!nrOO Or50$nUl.ly repOlliFO lhiD ]lehler iPd whj ch r ay l e undore:~.t iret ed in ot.her cener . They are therefore cf cencric .
Concerft to {hD f(F((. /!L6titt:nt' 2 to lh.iS enClerDre l'rr.Y.idC0 for your .
inforimt. ion a lict of jr(ortwtien recuertn f er which rcrperror wou]d le nceded for a prerer cerer rrent of the inpcct that the versel ir t erre) differential precrure, in conieretier eith lie ather concurrent Joa?r, could have on the d lan cdcou<cy of tFe rulfort cyc t ei%
3D t h ?l there Die CChrideralilD di f f erer:CC in th> reDCtCL DU[ port CYSLUF dcGinriE for VPricU: ficililitr ppd prCdfihly jn (le [frion UProiUr proVid(d -
hy { }'e (US j aPel; r f ( s } dt. t fECilitiOr, lhO ut.derefitiral.i(P cf t l' Ore "di f f er--
Cut 503 pit" u r P " l f. . ' ' r " C ' ' 01 ray not te"u.lt in O det er'; j rct iOP t!'Ot {he Pd( Our ?y of lia V( ! E t } r:. EO) t r \Ti & Ior a fl.cGifjC Il Ci l ii y iU OutfliCP-O Ed 1 } O . Si nt.N .l eC /r l. IL j lui UG jn Ll<e . reel r , , Or t l IruJh Fr p3artiC defCrFDt.iOP) du not rccernariiv Jet to the f ailure of th; reimper t: rn cn jntecra.1 syctc'r, ll!UJ t rN li re: * ]if i!i < rCrclot vcCre] tot ien pr c'?j(C d t het ro f ur t.hc r significant cen. o vr ecc. Uou]d erm an:1 t h> ernroercy c/ ie coolir,a rycters (IT( u ) v: u]d l e ch i c t e ; f r for r t hei r c'c':.ico f unct ionn . '
O
(. '
ATTAC;i.1ENT 1 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BRN;0! -
,P1 QUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In the unlikely event of a pipe rupture.inside major component subccmpartuents, the initial blowdown transient would lead to non-uniform pressure loadings on both the structures and enclosed compcnents. To assure the integrity of those design features, we, re, quest that you perforn a compartment multi-node pressure response analysis to provide the following information: ,
(a) The results of analysen of the dif ferential pressures resulting from hr;l leg and cold leg (pump suction and discharge) recciar cos>lant system pipe ruptures within the reactor cavity and_ pipe penetrations.
(b) D2 scribe the nodali7.ation sensitivity study performed to determine the minimum number of volu.te nodes required to conservatively O pre m t tne a -imum nrossure wiu,in the reactor cavity. The nc kliation sensitivity study should include consideration of spatial pressure variation; e.g., pressure variations circumferentially, axially and radially within the reactor cavity.
(c) Provida e schematic drawing showing the nodalization of the reactor cavity. Provide a tabulaLion of the nodal net free volumes and interconnecting flud path areas.
(d) Provide sufficiently detailed plan and section drawings for several views showing the arrangement of the reactor cavity structure, reactor vessel, piping, and other major obstructions, and vent areas, to pernit verification of the reactor cavity n,odalization and vent l oca tions . -
O w rrovide and su8tify tne hreaa type end area used in each anclysis.
. . t (
gy' O (f) Provide and Justify va1ues or vont loss coefficients and/or triction factors used to calculate flow between nodal volunos. When a loss coefficient consists of more than one component, identify each component, its value and the flow area at which the loss coefficient c
applies.
(
(g)
Discuss the manner in which movable obstructions to vent flow (such as insulation, ducting, plugs, and seals) were treeted. Provide analytical justification for the removal of such items to obtain vent ;
area. Provide justification that vent areas will not be partially or cc:apletely plugged by displaced objects.
(h) Provide a table of bicadci:n mass flow rate arid energy release rate as a function of time for the reactor cavity design basis accident.
(i) Graphically <.how the pressure (psin) and differential pressure (psi) rc<; > ues as functions o't tinu for each' node. Discuss the basis for estehluhing the di f f erential pressures.
(j) Provi& the pech calculated differential pressure and tine of pech pressure for each node, and the design differential pressure (s) for the reactor cavi ty. Discuss whether the design differential pressure is uniformly applied to the reactor cavity or whether it is spatially varied. (Standard Review Plan 6.2.1.2, Subcompartn.ent Analysis attached, provides additional guidance in establishing acceptable design values, for determining the acceptability of the calculated results. )
i O .
1 U.S. MUCLEAR REGULATORY C0uiMISG10N rehnnry, INS
( CT . % Q,uM,D
%)[u*dd u P !J 3 Q n, QiL1 ,a di 6 W;N61d,? M ?QG U me & a 'j IN l
O org,cc og muetsan imacron nacutarion l
l SF.LTION 6.2.1.2 SLBCOT/6T'W ANAL.YS!$
.m_._.l_b f_P E S P_O N S I C l u_T I E S_ ,
I Primry - Containvnt Systus f! ranch (CSB)
Secondary - Mechanical hgineerira Branch (ts)
Core Perfor. ance f; ranch (Cf B)
Auxiliery nd Pow tr Ccnver; ion Syste% f ranch (MCSB)
I. AWAS Of REVID.
The CS', revion the infore stion Drct,0ntec by the applic arit in the saf ety caly31s report concerning the d :terrin.ition of the dni;n dif f orc nt ia l ;te ,sure vc Net, i caouira :nt %. ,
compart. Nots. A wtcon.partmat is d fined as any ful!:, er partially orclostd volure within the priary co-tairmert tha t hNses high cnergy piping v.f wenld limit tb flyI of fluid to th y rain conta f r. cant volwe in the ev0nt of a postull t(c pipe rupturo within thi<. valu y l ' fr.t., . m ., r - puis ,tsid <
s'. 11 ; . 9. i' > < 'ts-
., feik q a pin ropture .a thir. thn vala:,a 1his prr so'< tr,msi n t pro ' s ., i prem differential a c ru s U'e wa l l s o f t he sukog arte mt .iich reaches * , p iir.m valur tewrally within tM f irst secon ' o f ter ble@,in be pins The i. g nituda of W reak value b = function of v:veral para A rs, .thich inM blwd in ra s s a nd es ;;j relene ra te , s M.cerb 'n t scitc< not a rf 3, inf vont flca i;;;havior. A transi'ot Li f f erc n t ial p*x ' wr e rc 'fm ma l) :-. ,haa l d , arm id s fcr ,eco sau ca m rtment or croup of sub paments that r :ts t h <- + defritien, ihr l'i i v ws 1 m. l u es the i m e i n ',.. h i c h t h e Em,5 : nd enorgy icleisc cate into the laa t
( F;..r! t .,t t.ece det tr.> ind. ' Aal ia tion of sLbc0N art a ts , sute p r tra t , cr.t f lm, behwin ,
'.nd wt w ;.a r tr.cnt dcs ip pru sure r argins. Inis includ", a car dirated revica effori P th" CFB. it c CW ii respnsible for the ad0gnty of the blc..h3 r:odel.
Ita CSS ,eviS of i k r-ns anJ energv releese rates inclu h s the tasis for the selectico of .
the pip.- Meak s ilt and location within cach subcorpartn.nt containiro > high cnergy lir.e and the calytic al procedure for predittir.9 the short-te r mass.and enn gy releJSc rates.
The I'W miew of t e subcccparta nt medcl includes the tasis for the no::ali7ation sitbin each .'
mpartc.nt, tM initial therr:J.,0c. tic conditicm within cach surep:rtNot, the ne'ure of each ve. t f lce.; path tensidcred, cod th( ex ten t of en trait,:, r,t M wed in the w.nt flow >ixture, rh? revicw Uy also include an analysis ei thti dyna ,ic W rac teri!,t ics o f cm p nc its, such e s decrs, lilevout panels, or san'i plugs , tha t r.ust mn cr le rrowd to USNBC STANDACD DEViEW PL A!J p
sw,m nn
.-., #, , r..s es. pr a, rvam..
.ru.4, twm...m., .w. ,ue , ,, s. n . ca:e
. s. .e. nv., rm.. i su# v>. r.,>f nu,n .. er n ; vue ln ee uw.s c< . . o s u ma n.
, , -a ~ c -
g la g ti 91.d 4 6 C. f f e{flslJt 9F F PIO tt I .e' 9 9 41,.l fili. 'd4 9 i 't ' d f f v t aw p .8,13 a rig st yf g.024'I .d ivt i m,,,e , m s,- .,o o % .,,,, em,s C $ ty li 4d( 4 Wi Pt IM 4 h ft ! t 44 '8'13 f 5 ) .f .#!Of'Y j d - 79 e P 1. 4 ( . P4 e n' )J $ F*, 's . . .z 1 ) as i j
. If* 4 it 1, } or rl r , J .hp?g 34 8 I;rf r, a # P IQwyf Il.Mi t NN 8N W.1.P 5 O f O 9 : M y ;g J $ s 9.) lQ be d ht
- g ag t pf?I . Jd r @ M v .ut prh.f Ct;Pt + tt ^ f h ta ,, y 4., e , j g fg , c,,,
' 1614+ 3 I wr1 P l11 m5& #11 O
? n J f 5 Mees p e4 Iyks tl 4 I $ I4't j l#J f ev119w p'4. t 5 h b e 10 sI191 p ." Si b'ht. 95 3 /p' ti a 4 to a 'c r m*"G J.s'4 r 11 * 'a t ad to #-Allib-1 e 'w e
k-' .--t st 0 9 p itt a t, p e so.
Ce g l+g ( fSf as i Ard F #. Ow f u 4 1 e r lo t - Y 4 n't f 1 f i e 1 O ! 14144 L. #l fv . fl q.d 4 t :F 'y { r,; em g g.0 *. V. s- Of fw e .J ',.5ft ,a P
L .ny ; q O ; $ A *1
- q 8e.4 ;( pg b )psig*rJet ( f,P MWMgpMdW )jlv ( nt 4. P 70 d eM Spl va l i ep g W 1 WJ d.d s h 0f ) p a q(.4 un' lJ CA y 8f- 4 t,t b , ; ,4r H a M )' h !, N1 emess
(;
provide a vent fic.i path, and the n ethods an i results of corpontnts tr sts _perfon ed to demnstrate the velidity cf these analyses. The culytical procedure to determine the loss coefficicots for cach vent flow path and to i redict the vent wss flow rates, including flow correlation , uwd to cc rpute sonic and sute.onic flow ccoditions within a vent, is re-viewed. The dr.ign prese.ure chosen (cr cach subcci/psrtecnt is also reviewed. On r eques t f rom the AFC59, the CSB evaluate.; or perfccms pressure response u.alysos for sub;omp3rtments outside centa in.m:n t.
lhe MEB is respansib h fc, .evicaing the acceptability of the brak locations chosen and of the desic;n criteria and prs isicas, and rethods trployed to Jubtify liriited pipe ration f or brech ps!.tulatt d to occur ws: Sin sub:ccpart:nants (See Standu d Review plan 3.6.2),
r J!. ACCEPf W E CR;iE.U A
- 1. Tne r.ub~ m;a rt .L analysis sWld inw;cra to the follrair,g anu9ticos: >
- e. Creak locatice ar.d types J.mid b: chosen ncordirc to TZgulatory Guide 1.45 for e
H ' r '- w. t s i rd, i dn c: 1 3irc:;Pt mi tn L< mc5 Te(I nical Pcsitic* 'd8 3-1 (3rt ni. s * '+ m<h d P_, H. 3. 6. ?) t r. %. x. irteents w isid! cnM a ir.c i e An actcpuble al terra t e p acedure is to postulate a circraferential double-endeel rupture of each high pressre systtm pir4 in the subtownrtmnt.
- b. Of se,eral brc:b patulettd en the basis of a, above, th ' br.uk seltcled as the refer < < ;e tese f or sud ;Nrte ent analysis should yield tha 1.ighest r: ass and encrgy release retu., consis tent with the criterie for establishing the tireak O - - " -
ine initial pi':nt epera tir-p con iitions, such as pressure, tecperatt;re, eter in.cntcry, and p; er le,11, shauld be selected to yield the r eirtu a blaa k.in
( nodi t icn a IN sel& ted 0, ?ratire ce ditions will L' acceptoble if it can La m.n tM t a th um of each rarar ater wald n esult in c less severe t lo th.,n profi!.
- 2. fue analyt tr al pprmch used t'o cocpute the crass and etercy release profile will be a n e; te ; i f to th t hi. (c e;,ater progrmi and voluo radir.g of the piping sys tnt ar; s i d iar to nne of an apprce cd n ergen;y core coaling syste.c, (ECCS) analysis. The n nfe, e.a.ir cr that are cuo ently attertel>1e include MTAN-VI (Ref N), CRAri-li c t . 23), Ll' T LM& O (Re f. 2 5), u e RLLN3 (rnf. Pl), urun a fica r:ultiplier of 1.0 is used ith the 0;mliable choke.' fit , correl a ti on. An altern ue apprm ch, uhh.h is also acceptaMe, is la rssume a (cr6 tent blNdmin ptofile v3ir.g the initial ce sdi tit t , oith an ciccptchie cWid fica correle. tion, ' 'n f EI AP-4 is accepted t,y t he s ta f f a s a op;raticul ECL5 Mcad7.m rode, it will b> mptable for s' ucempart-c'ent an alyses.
- 3. The initial a t ospherir conditiers within ' " ' e c "p3 rtan t should be selec ted to rm.-
imize (Le i siultant dificrential pressure. /n acceptMe whl ..culd be to assuro air a t th5 m ie.c allo.>iable temperc ture, uin hu a Osolute pres sure, ,'d zero percent rel-if the asttme) ini t ici c tma;pOric con h t ions di f fer fro these, the O
alive hualdi ty, selected values shoald b; jm.tif ied.
6.2.1,?-?
Another rJ>de) that is ulso actg t Sle, for a restriet<.d cle ci rub m artr'mt s , i n.
volves siglifying tha t ir , otl o. tlined < tove, i or Mi s Mc'el , t he ini tial e';.os-l' O phere within the sutrc0 y r t&nt l', r 3 doled ds a. hwc3 "29us mier-s tew: mi/ ture i.,i th an vuc e nsity edit elent to the dry nir nodM This a mroeb shcaid b trited te svLtompartuents th? t have cFei:e1 f ly.; within the vents. lia.ev e r , the idM;uicy o f this sii<plified r:a ial fcr 5ubco w rt nts havirig prir arily suhaic flow through the vr.nts hn rat been citablishet 4
Subcocar t~en t not'aliza tico sche s thould be chosen such that there is na substantial prenure w adic , m thin a roh,' i .e. , the radali n tion schea, should be verified by c sens iti /i ty s t udy it.J t inclui's inc reas int. the r,w ber of nada., ontil the pech cul-cola ted f rmsures comers to st all resul tan t c har, ius ,
f 5, if vent fla pitm m ~d d ich a e t.at ir din f ely cvailable a t th: tim of r i p. >
ro;, ' ' 4 , th? follcalm; cri'"rta apply
, , , , 7 t. g j .; p g,. y .. , .g ) g i 6; e ! i c, -
ilj'i i
of ira 7., W ,Jrl'u ' ,e s.,, u p m to pip rup tm M t) ,
lh" validi ty o f th enaly:.is sh9;1d L:r supporud by experit.Nntal da tc or o
- M t i rG pr g ra (
' w l'f ti pr01 osed c t th 2 canitruction perrit '.ta p that' vill
<,,;r* t h i ', 6
- l f;i s
( ,
efterte of itinilts W t say L. pnN oted duri@ (M N,m .imt GM d n
^ "'
O ~ " ~ "
- 6. fica u u m ro p ajj f}c, path within tbc rabli2td t o partwnt i edd
+
1 ' a t- m , r . t m e i r, thrr.a1 equilibrice ,i:ith the euu wtien 0: *o na > a i: r. t . o eddition, the 'ciectrJ sent critical floa cor relation sr 't-m , f rv o i . d th resg.c t to evailable experir ntal data. Currently accept-sJ ,
itit: cal flw terrelations a n thu "frict ionless ru.>df uith a cultiplier of 0I rm > r-ste-
- r. i:s t u re t , and the therm 1 howtnPaus equilibrium nadel for a i r- s t - atm mix tui es
- 7. M r corstrx tion pcn it sty, a f actor of 1.4 she.uld b9 applice to th2 peh diffa tntia rrMsur e tel'ulated in a r arner fourJ u tertable to th" C59 for (F Sbh r s urb mt. Thc calculc %d r res vi e r ui tiplied tiy 1.4 shnid 1.0 considJrad th; dciign tre "ra. li t the cparatirg licen?-0 sta;;e, th7 pJ3k cultul A ld dif f orential pren urr Could not e'" 11 th< Gsica pre Mur' It is expected that tha p d calev-la ted d if f er en t-in l P reO 'o i-!Ill ral W substcotially dif ferent h am tha t of' the cons t r u( t ich H9rit st1 Hosevt r , ir;revec :nts in the enalytice1 ; chl5 or charms in in es.b;ilt sotw urtc.cnt ' Af af fect thz availnt,lo urgi III. REVi!W fe.; i L'Jf:E 5 i
lhe procedur< s dc scribed belo<: a re f ol icacd f or the wbcoc uru.cnt cnalysis rcvic.-f &
reviev"! 5 elect (
and c,phisizes r aterial fra these procd'em 's ray b ; propria te f or 6.2.1.2-3
, ~
l a pnt iculer case. Portiens of the reviet r.uy Li carried out on a generic Lacis or by adoptin the result! of previc is re.iews of plants with essentially the same subcompartrent and high prenure cipinj design, lhe CSB reviews the initial conditions selected for determining the rm s and crargy rclease rate to the subcotpn taents. Thc se valuu are cur;ared to the spectrw of allo,;able opera-ting conditions for tP plent. The (33 will asctrtain the adeluccy of tM assu. M conditicm, based cn this rr view.
The CSB confir, . With the EC the validity of the applicant's enalysis cf subce,rgettsants containing high energy line; and po..tule ted pip: tri '
locatiom, using elevation and plan c'rmdny, of the containt at sScaing the routin] of lines cenicinin; hir,h energy fluids. The CSC Ntterines that an arcpriate refeience case for sobrpartn 'at analysis ,
hcs t>cen identified. In tho event a pipe bred. other then a double-ended pipe rupture is postblittd by th0 applicant, th2 fG aill evaluate th: applicant 's jus ti fica tivo f or ds strnir.1 e lir,itred displacc.:snt pipe Lreg ,
The C% r y/ geforn ccW ir ratory draly , ,, of the blo.my. n ras and enyt.;, profiles within e sub o partcent. Th; analysis is d:"e using the 6 tim con uter progr (See b ference 21 f or a c'ncript ir e of thi; cc 4: parpose of tu analysis is to c :nfirn the predic-tion, t o: mv end ensern release ra t es 4; earir; in the safety onelnis report, ard to ccofi- >!
an e propriao Latak lc,.3 tion has (".cn conside ed ir this a.alysis lhe v,e of h * 'll cetim util tn ; !! ly; co puter cH W. Leen approe^d l y ilm s t a f f as O an v N7 'o' At th) tic , th" (SU uill repince ut u 3 with M /,p; for all i ! ; 1y:,e s The i th,
.nri v ncy cf th: in f orr e t ich i n t b. :,Jfety analysis report ryprding su h 't \ 01; ,
61nt creas, cnd vent resistencts, I f a s ,t.ca pb ro ant mus t rely on dso N ,.nl p els , ar Waival .nt d:vius to inc reat0 Vent breas, tne CSS revie.,s the eniiy3 s
,wa tes t t ry ;'rops that snLst an tiate thei r use, lhe CW reciews the 1,adaliid tion of each sub:cmpart&nt to deter:aine the edequacy of the calculatiaal ci.Jel. As n?cessary, C50 perform iterathe rodalization studies fod sub.
Comparto w c to confirm that sufficient nod:s ha e licen included in thu 'dcl.
The a n (ocpM es the initial sun or, a tent air pressum, temperature, c:ci humidity condi..
t i o m. t o t h>
triteria of 11, abMa, to c scre that conurvative ccr.ditier.s v:ere selected, Ihe CSis revices the baws, correintions, and cwnutei ccdes uicd ta predict subsonic and sonic vent floa t.ehnior and tM capability of the c0/e ta '7 del c; 7rc>nfole and un-coa.pressible f loa, lha bases should include cenarisons of' the correlations to bsth experimental data and recogniycd alterr. ate correlatie ,s that hwe l'eDn accepted by the staff, O
6.2,1, ? 4 1
( Usira the nodall/a tion of tath subce:n,2arO unt es specified in the saf ety enalysis report, t!,o CSB perforrs an91yses usir.] cne of several evai h.ble c'r puter pecyec ^. to e ternine the edequacy of the calculated ptuk dif fereati&l pressure. The coi;rfer prege r.m used will cyar.d upoa '.h set,cas a r to ,1t ui '-:r ra ! , e s , all .M thi fle., r _
a it tt '
p r( s tite, tht two progru , und b;' th:' CSB cre ret /-P3 (i.ef. 21) cr.J C0iIft PI-LT (W fs. 7, 8, and 9). A rulti-valo:e ersputer cadu is currcntly und.r develop rot. ,
At tht Construction permit stcy , the C50 will ascertain tha t the subcompartcent d; sign '
pressures in W H ep;u npriato rargins etove the calculated values, as given in II, abov d
IV. fVllt;MIC1 FIrijitm lhe tcnclusicns reached en r.c pletion of the t evies of this section ere : Tsented in Standatd P> vies ilen ' 0,?,1, V. .R. E_F,.D. .i el s The refen na for this plan ert thase listed in $t'andard Revica Plan 6,?.1, togetber with fa ..m ,
la. Pogula tory Gu ido 1.%, " Pro tec t ion /G; inst pip. Whip f re;ide t.cntairemnt,"
23, bl e- . <d h vic Pli n 3. 6. 7, % te n ,, o.a t i nn o f {,reak l ocation- and Djnv ic f.f t ect s
/v ' .d wi t h t he h.s t ulo ted Pu;,ture of Piping,' cro at tached i;ranc h h chnir.a l s P-
- , , ' iU 3- 1, "I o;,t ol n ie d Cree k and l < mgy t ou tion" in i-luit! S;.s t en Piping O' O. u.ta ir ,,t t
O 6.?,1.F-5
. . - . . . . . ... . . . . - - . - - - - - --,,-u,
\
i . .. .v y
.I i l 7 ATTAC M QT 2. . - - -
t s .b.E_C H Y._!.I.C__/t__E U.._C f il E F R I NG B P /J!CH 7
O 4 x
, Tw su rea imrm mmes
.s L I t n i \ i
% g i Pecer L enelyses have shm;n (r ht react.c pressure vessel sppports rany be ,3 subje:kd tet. previNpl[ undern s t, a t >d lateral loat's cader the coaditions h
.thatycZd exist if 'an instan tr.neous double ended break is poS L ' lated in i
5 t h e re <.n .ttor vessel told 1eg pipe at the vessel nozzle. It is therefore i
heces pry to reasv :s the cgNh ilit/ of the reactor conhnt systent whports M; td ]imit the calculated jatio, ci the rcmctor vessel during a phtalet,ed cold I
!On J,ru'.
1 x s
'11 lh T!! h0'in@. n .: r:C $ ' ' / t o U !. c. U r 0 hi .N Dr'Jwhili {'/ ih 3 L i ? qw"I
- 4 t
reUClOr COulci he brought S '1f(.ly tr a 'cul d r.i4t h; a n condi tj em ,
- 1 The follhilj i n f o ni;i t ion . recpiped rop par gg of g jgg (gg gg , ,
rense u or tnc rem <am'.a supports- .
1 0 l., m , % % d m.on , or m re m or supyor1 ys tm u r ts cien to U t he ge: 'try of all principle cle; an ts. rnd in terials of ri.in-6 b 'h. f} n
- 2. hec l j th0 dOtuil dOSign lODds used in the original desiC,D InalySCS Of
'd.e l ead or c.upnaris giving risgnia.de, direction of application and the
\ , ,
bDSin f or edrh lDi'd. /ilSO pr0V'ide Ch? Cal CUl) j/2d 'IraXiM'M S tre,s in ed1 pr in C i pl 0 CleD?nt Of 1,he support nvs 's and 't's.e corresponding allonable i
StreS'e . '
g f.
- 3. Provide the in fon:ttion rC4uested in 2 Acefu. the D supports con- .
9 sidering a pastulated -r bred at the cold lef Snzle In cl u'k a s ui ma ry a ss g
b e bnd y .iCO) D ' h #)(l [' C h. J 'g G}f]d g q d s' rj n ; jgg} r, 4 p g. . .{
g # --
short term prbssvr< differential, acQs j the core barrel i \doJbination ./
'l c'1 3
\ I
,j 1 ,
( .
V-
\
f ,
, a f A >
- \
. l,i . ' i)
(
7 -,
O with all external loadings calculated to result from the required par. tu l a t e . This enaly5ir, should consid.r.
(0) limited displacement break areas where applicable (b) considera tion of fluid s tructure interactio.
(c) use of actual time dependent i'orcing function (d) reactor support s tiffness.
- 4. If the results of the anclyres required by 3 abv/e indicates loads leading to inelastic action in the reactor supports or displacements 5 exce:rdin<j previous da ;ign luiits oro ide an esaluatica of th:> folles;r y (a) Vield _ behavior (effeci:; of possible strain energy buildup) of the mterial used in the reactor support design and the effect on the load:,
5 t
!<onsmitted to thc reactor coolcut sys taa nnd the backup
'h uttures to which th? reactor coolcnt system supports are attached.
.p (b) adequacy of the reactor coolant systui pipir,9, control rod is's, steam generator and pump supports structurer surrounding the reactor coolant system, reactor internals and ECCS piping -
to assure that the reactor can be safely brought to cold shutdc in.
3 t
O
.