ML083660029

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:08, 14 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

10/30/08 Summary of Public Meeting on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Regarding the Beaver Valley Power Station, License Renewal Review
ML083660029
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/09/2009
From: Sayoc E
License Renewal Projects Branch 2
To:
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Sayoc, Manny, NRR/DLR/RLRB 415-1924
Shared Package
ML090020057 List:
References
TAC MD6595, TAC MD6596
Download: ML083660029 (34)


Text

January 09, 2009 LICENSEE: FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FACILITY: Beaver Valley Power Station

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF PUBLIC MEETINGS ON THE DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REGARDING THE BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL REVIEW (TAC NOS.

MD6595 AND MD6596)

On October 30, 2008, members of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) held public meetings at the Embassy Suites, 550 Cherrington Parkway, Pittsburgh, PA 15108, concerning the staff=s environmental review of the application submitted by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) for renewal of Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS) operating licenses. The purpose of the meeting was to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the draft supplemental environmental impact statement (DSEIS) which was issued in September 2008. Formal presentations were made by the NRC staff.

The DSEIS is a site-specific supplement for BVPS to the ?Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants@ (NUREG-1437). The NRC staff described the overall license renewal process, and provided a description of the environmental review process. The NRC staff also described the preliminary results of their analyses. The environmental impacts of continued operation were preliminarily characterized as small in all areas. The impacts of alternatives (including the no-action alternative) were preliminarily characterized as potentially reaching moderate to large significance in at least some environmental areas.

After the formal presentations were given by the NRC staff, members of the public were invited to provide comments. Approximately 45 people attended the two sessions. Attendees included members of the public, representatives of the NRC, representatives of the licensee, representatives from State agencies, and local government officials.

In an effort to improve communication and increase interaction with members of the public, the NRC staff conducted open houses for one hour before each meeting. The staff provided displays and brochures and met with members of the public to answer questions about the proposed renewal of the BVPS operating licenses.

A combined listing of attendees for both public meetings is provided in Enclosure 1. Enclosure 2 is the meeting agenda. Enclosure 3 is a copy of the meeting handouts provided during the public meeting open house. The official corrected transcripts for the afternoon and evening meetings are publicly available at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, or from the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). The ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room is accessible at http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. The transcripts for the afternoon and evening meetings are listed under Accession Nos.

ML083250519 and ML083250520, respectively.

A copy of the slides used during the NRC=s presentation is also available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML083240051. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.

The closing date to accept comments on the BVPS DSEIS was December 17, 2008. The NRC staff will consider all comments on the BVPS DSEIS received by December 17, 2008, and make any necessary revisions to the document prior to issuing its final supplemental environmental impact statement, scheduled for May 2009.

/RA/

Emmanuel Sayoc License Renewal Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/encls.: See next page

1. Meeting Summary (w /Encls.): ML083660029
2. Afternoon Transcript (Corrected): ML083250519
3. Evening Transcript (Corrected): ML083250520
4. Package: ML090020057 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:DLR:RPB2 PM:DLR:RPB2 BC:DLR:RPB2 NAME SFigueroa ESayoc KHoward DWrona DATE 01/08/09 01/08/09 01/08/09 01/09/09

Letter to FirstEnergy from E. Sayoc, dated January 09, 2009 DISTRIBUTION:

SUBJECT:

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRbp2 RidsNrrDlrRerb RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDciCvib RidsNrrDciCpnb RidsNrrDraAfpb RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDssSbwb RidsNrrDssSbpb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsOgcMailCenter


KHoward ESayoc NMorgan MModes, RI PCataldo, RI DWerkheiser, RI L. Subin N. Sheehan R. Barkley N. McNamara E. Benner D. Screnci R. Bellamy

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS BVPS LICENSE RENEWAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING MEETINGS October 30, 2008 Participants Affiliation Bo Pham U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Richard Barkley NRC Emmanuel Sayoc NRC Dianne Screnci NRC David Werkheiser NRC Ron Bellamy NRC Nadiyah Morgan NRC Cliff Custer First Energy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC)

Mike Banko FENOC Joe Tweddell FENOC Scott Waitlevertch FENOC Dave Jenkins FENOC Anthony Dometrovich FENOC Colin Keller FENOC Larry Freeland FENOC Jim Veglia FENOC Julie Firestone FENOC Kevin Ostrowski FENOC Carman Mancuso FENOC Dave Dillon FENOC Marla Lawres FENOC Ray Lieh FENOC Glenn Ritz FENOC Brian Sepelak FENOC Ken Woessner FENOC Levi Stahl FENOC Larry Ryan Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection Douglas Fleck Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Kathryn Sutton Morgan Lewis Linda Swaney Habitat for Humanity Larry Foulke University of Pittsburgh Robin Canei AVI Foodsystems Diane Dornenburdg Beaver County Chamber of Commerce Michael Costantino Public Memeber Rich Luczko Public Memeber David Banko Public Memeber Brandon Fischer Public Memeber Joey Borelli Public Memeber Patty Kelly Public Memeber James Hendrickson Public Memeber Ray Wacker Public Memeber Denise Taylor Public Memeber Stephen Catanzarite Public Memeber Joanna Greco Public Memeber Jeff Davis Public Memeber ENCLOSURE 1

AGENDA FOR PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF THE BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OCTOBER 30, 2008 Two Meeting Sessions - 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m I. Welcome and Purpose of Meeting 5 minutes (Richard Barkley)

II. Overview of Environmental Review Process 10 minutes (Emmanuel Sayoc)

III. Overview of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Findings 20 minutes (Emmanuel Sayoc)

IV. Public Comments As Required (Richard Barkley)

V. Closing Comments 5 minutes (Bo Pham)

ENCLOSURE 2

Slide 1 Preliminary Results of the Environmental Review for Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1 and 2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 30, 2008

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

ENCLOSURE 3

Slide 2 Purpose of Todays Meeting Discuss the results of environmental review Provide the review schedule Describe how to submit comments in the future Accept oral and written comments

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 3 NRCs Regulatory Oversight Atomic Energy Act Issue operating licenses Regulate civilian use of nuclear materials NRC Mission Public health and safety Security Environment Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 4 Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1 and 2 Current operating licenses expire in January 2016, and May 2027 Application requests authorization to operate Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1 and 2 for an additional 20 years

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 5 Environmental Review NRC Decision License Renewal Application Submitted to NRC Draft SEIS Meetiing Final SEIS Issued Environmental Scoping Draft SEIS Review Meeting Issued Environmental Audit

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 6 Environmental Review National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to use a systematic approach to consider environmental impacts An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment The Commission has determined that a Supplement (SEIS) to the Generic EIS for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants will be prepared for a license renewal application

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 7 Information Gathering License Renewal Application NRC Staff Staffs Public Site Audit Comments SEIS State & Local Permitting Agencies Authorities

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 8 Team Expertise Atmospheric Science Radiation Protection Socioeconomics/

Environmental Justice Terrestrial Land Use Ecology Aquatic Ecology Archaeology/Historical Resources Hydrology

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 9 Environmental Review Scope Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) 69 Category 1 issues Site-specific Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) 23 remaining issues New and Significant Information 9

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 10 Decision Standard for Environmental Review To determine whether or not the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1 and 2 are so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable.

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 11 Environmental Impacts of Continued Operation Cooling system Transmission Lines Radiological Impacts Socioeconomic Impacts Threatened or Endangered Species Refurbishment Postulated Accidents Cumulative Impacts

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 12 How Impacts are Quantified NRC-defined impact levels:

SMALL: Effect is not detectable or too small to destabilize or noticeably alter any important attribute of the resource MODERATE: Effect is sufficient to alter noticeably, but not destabilize important attributes of the resource LARGE: Effect is clearly noticeable and sufficient to destabilize important attributes of the resource

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 13 Cooling System Category 2 issues Water Use Conflicts Microbiological Organisms (Public Health)

Preliminary findings Impacts are SMALL No mitigation identified

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 14 Radiological Impacts Category 1 issues Radiation exposures to the public Occupational radiation exposures Preliminary findings No new and significant information identified GEIS concluded impacts are SMALL

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 15 Threatened or Endangered Species Category 2 issues Bald Eagle No Federally-listed T&E terrestrial species Piping Plover No aquatic species Preliminary findings No Impacts Indiana Bat No mitigation required Images: http://images.fws.gov, http://www.nwf.org/wildlife/indianabat/.

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 16 Socioeconomics Category 1 issues Public services, aesthetic impacts Category 2 issues Housing, public utilities, offsite land use, transportation, historic resources Environmental Justice Preliminary findings No new and significant information None to SMALL impact

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 17 Refurbishment Category 1 issues Category 2 issues Preliminary findings No new and significant information None to SMALL impact 17

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 18 Postulated Accidents Category 1 issues Design-basis accidents Severe Accidents Severe accidents Severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMAs)

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 19 SAMA Evaluation Process 63 and 56 for Units 1 and 2 respectively potential SAMAs considered 5 and 3 for Units 1 and 2 respectively SAMAs identified as cost-beneficial None relate to managing the effects of aging; therefore, neither are required as part of license renewal 19

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 20 Other Environmental Impacts Evaluated Uranium Fuel Cycle and Solid Waste Management Decommissioning

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 21 Cumulative Impacts of Operation Considered impacts of renewal term operations combined with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions Evaluated to end of 20-year renewal term Preliminary Findings Considered industrial actions and facilities in the region.

Impacts could range from SMALL to MODERATE 21

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 22 Alternatives Alternatives Considered No-action (license not renewed)

Alternative energy sources New generation (Coal, Natural Gas, Nuclear)

Purchased electrical power Combination of alternatives Preliminary Findings Environmental impacts of alternatives could reach SMALL or MODERATE significance in some impact areas

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 23 Preliminary Conclusions Impacts of license renewal are SMALL for all impact areas Impacts of alternatives may reach SMALL to MODERATE The NRC staffs preliminary recommendation is the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for BVPS Units 1 and 2 are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 24 Beaver Valley Environmental Review Milestones Application Received August 27, 2007 Notice of Intent October 29, 2007 Scoping Public Meeting November 27, 2007 Scoping Period Ended December 17, 2007 Scoping Summary Report January 30, 2008 Draft SEIS September 23, 2008 Draft SEIS Public Meeting October 30, 2008 Draft SEIS Comments Due December 17 , 2008 Final SEIS May 25, 2009

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 25 Additional Information Project Manager: Project Manager:

Kent Howard Emmanuel Sayoc (800) 368-5642, Ext. 2989 (800) 368-5642, Ext. 1924 Kent.Howard@nrc.gov Emmanuel.Sayoc@nrc.gov The draft SEIS and GEIS can be viewed at:

Local Libraries: Beaver Area Memorial Library, and Beaver County Library System Online: NRC Reading Room or ADAMS http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement36/

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Slide 26 Submitting Comments By e-mail: BeaverValleyEIS@nrc.gov By mail: Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Mailstop T-6D59 U.S. NRC Washington DC 20555 In person: 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

____________________

Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Joseph J. Hagan Ohio EPA-DERR President and Chief Nuclear Officer ATTN: Zack A. Clayton FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 1049 Mail Stop A-GO-19 Columbus, OH 43266-0149 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Peter P. Sena III Site Vice President James H. Lash FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Senior Vice President of Operations Beaver Valley Power Station and Chief Operating Officer Mail Stop A-BV-SEB-1 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Mail Stop A-GO-14 Shippingport, PA 15077 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Director, Fleet Regulatory Affairs FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Danny L. Pace Mail Stop A-GO-2 Senior Vice President, Fleet Engineering 76 South Main Street FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Akron, OH 44308 Mail Stop A-GO-14 76 South Main Street Manager, Site Regulatory Compliance Akron, OH 44308 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Jeannie M. Rinckel Mail Stop A-BV-A Vice President, Fleet Oversight P.O. Box 4, Route 168 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Shippingport, PA 15077 Mail Stop A-GO-14 76 South Main Street Richard Anderson Akron, OH 44308 Vice President, Nuclear Support FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company David W. Jenkins, Attorney Mail Stop A-GO-14 FirstEnergy Corporation 76 South Main Street Mail Stop A-GO-15 Akron, OH 44308 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Commissioner James R. Lewis West Virginia Division of Labor Manager, Fleet Licensing 749-B, Building No. 6 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Capitol Complex Mail Stop A-GO-2 Charleston, WV 25305 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Director, Utilities Department Public Utilities Commission 180 East Broad Street Columbus, OH 43266-0573

Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Jennifer Kagel Pennsylvania Field Office Tony Gonyea 315 South Allen St., Suite 322 Onondaga Nation State College, PA 16801-4850 RR#1, Route 11A Box 319B Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Via Nedrow, NY 13120 Management Agency 2605 Interstate Dr. Cliff Custer Harrisburg, PA 17110-9364 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Dr. Judith Johnsrud P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Environmental Coalition on Nuclear Power Shippingport, PA 15077 Sierra Club 433 Orlando Avenue Mike Banko State College, PA 16803 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Director P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Bureau of Radiation Protection Shippingport, PA 15077 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Julie Firestone Rachel Carson State Office Building FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 8469 Beaver Valley Power Station Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 Mayor of the Borough of Shippingport P.O. Box 3 Sherry White Shippingport, PA 15077 Cultural Preservation Officer Stockbridge-Munsee Band of the Mohican Regional Administrator, Region I Nation, Wisconsin U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 1, P.O. Box 70 475 Allendale Road Bowler, WI 54416 King of Prussia, PA 19406 Greg Bunker Resident Inspector Director Environmental/NEPA U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Stockbridge-Munsee Band of the Mohican P.O. Box 298 Nation, Wisconsin Shippingport, PA 15077 Route 1, P.O. Box 70 Bowler, WI 54416