IR 05000275/1980005

IE Insp Rept 50-275/80-05 on 800201-29.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Testing,Plant Tour QA & Controls,Operator Training & Witnessing of Testing in Progress

ML16340A997
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	03/11/1980
From:	Sternberg D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML16340A996	List: IR 05000275/1980005 ML16340A995
References
50-275-80-05, 50-275-80-5, NUDOCS 8005280148
Download: ML16340A997 (6)

Text

U. S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION V

50-275/80-05 Docket No.

License No.

CPPR-39 Safeguards Group

W Licensee:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street San Francisco, California 94106 Faci1ity Name Diablo Canyon Unit 1 Diablo Canyon Site, San Luis Obispo County, California Inspection conducted:

~

~

yW Inspectors:

o ert Young J., Seni R i ent Inspector Date Signed Date Signed Approved by:

Summary:

Date Signed s /Ii Date Signed D. H. Sternberg, Chic

,

~ eactor Projects Section foal Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Ins ect ion of Februar 1-29 1')80 Re ort 50-275/80-05 Areas Ins ected:

Routine inspection of preoperational testing, plant tour, preoperational testing-QA, preoperational test controls, operator training and witnessing of testing in progress.

This inspection involved 102 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC. resident inspector.

Results:

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identfied.

s o os 2so /0'9 IE:V Form 219 (2)

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted

• R. D. Ramsay, Plant Superintendent R. D. Etzler, Project Superintendent

%1.

N. Norem, Resident Startup Engineer

• C. >1. Seward, Acting QA Supervisor

• J. S. Diamonon, QC Supervisor

• J. H. Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer

• D. A. Backons, Supervisor of Haintenance

• R. Patterson, Supervisor of Operations The inspector also talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including members of general construction, the operations staff and QA personnel.

• Denotes those attending the exit interview.

2.

A Preo erational Testin The inspector examined all QA audit reports of preoperational testing audits conducted within the last three months.

The inspector verified that the audits were conducted in accordance with approved procedures and that corrective actions for all identified discrepancies had been taken.

System turnover from construction to the startup test.group and to the operations division was conducted in accordance with establi.shed procedures and administrative controls.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

3.

Plant Tour The inspector walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly basis to observe activities in progress; to inspect the general state of cleanliness, housekeeping and adherence to fire protection rules; to check the proper approval of "man on the line, caution and clearance" tags on equipment, and to review with operation personnel the status of various systems in the plant.

The inspector noted that the status of the systems and the housekeeping appeared consistent with construction activities.

The reactor cavity is still being maintained as a clean area and extra personnel are still assigned to cleanup crews.

Cleanliness and housekeeping of the plant is still improving.

No items of noncompliance or devi.ations were identifie.

Prep eration Test Pro ram Controls The inspector verified by record review and/or observation that (a) juris-diction controls were being observed for system turnover, (b) tagging was being accomplished consistent with jurisdictional controls of the adminis-trative procedures and (c) controls were being observed prior to and subsequent to testing.

A schedule is. being maintained for preoperational testing and updated when necessary.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

5.

0 erator Trainin The operations division is continuing their intensive retraining program for the operators to include one week at the Westinghouse simulator.

The inspector has monitored some of these classes and will monitor more classes throughout the training program.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6.

Preo erational Testin a.

Portions of the following test were witnessed by the inspector:

26.1.2A1 34.1 8.1.8A3 Retest hydrogen purge system Fuel transfer system functional test Flush charging pump suction piping b.

While witnessing, the above testing (in some tests only parts of the tests were being performed or redone),

the inspector verified that the procedures were technically adequate; the latest revisions were available and approved; the overall crew performance was adequate and, in the case of completed tests, the acceptance criteria were met.

Administrative controls for design change and documentation were followed.

No i'tems of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

7.

Exit Interview The inspector met with a senior licensee representative on a weekly basis and with the representatives denoted in Paragraph 1 on February 29, 1980.

The scope and findings of the inspection were summarized by the inspector.