IR 05000275/1989012

Insp Repts 50-275/89-12 & 50-323/89-12 on 890403-07.No Violations or Deficiencies Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Followup on Previous Insp Findings & Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program

ML20245D948
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	04/18/1989
From:	Brown G, Fish R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20245D946	List: IR 05000275/1989012 ML20245D943
References
50-275-89-12, 50-323-89-12, NUDOCS 8905010243
Download: ML20245D948 (4)

Text

'

.c w .

<

y, .

F',

> M , ,

'

,

'

m..,,.:. .

.

'

r

_ .. ?

_

• y

.

,

..  ?

,

w', ,

..+.'

-

f , e, U.' S. NUCLEAR' REGULATORY _ COMMISSION ,

.o c -

REGION V

,

y Report'No /89-12 and 50-323/89-12

~

'

'

t-License'Nos.- DPR-80 and DPR-81

Licensee: ' Pacific Gas and_ Electric" Company

.77 Beale Street:

San. Francisco, California 94106

,

, '-Facility: Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 ,

Inspection ati Diablo. Canyon Site,-San Luis Obispo County ~

, ,' ~_ Inspection .

. .

! April 3-7, 1989^

'

Conducted:

,

Inspec' tor: ,M1 / f ,

1. . _G.-A. Brown.:

. f Da'te Signed Emergency Preparedness Analyst

'

,

'< Approved by:

~ ~

.

., R. F. Fish, Chief D' ate' Si'gned

Emergency Preparedness Section.

[ ;" 7 '

'Summaryi E" -

This was an unannounced inspection in the areas of followup on previou *

inspection findings ~and operational status of the emergency preparedness ,

progra Inspection procedures 92701 and 82701 were use '

"

s Results:

) No-deficiencies or violations of NRC requirements were identified in the two

_

- areas covered by the inspectio No negative. findings were identified durit:0 l [',. . this; inspectio A

,

.

8905010243 890418"

'

p' PDR ADOCK 05000275

'

Q PDC

,

' ' " ' ' '- - . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . - _ . _ _ .

'

,

'

+ 9-

.

.

. .

,

DETAILS Persons Contacted PG&E Personnel:

• J. Townsend, Plant Manager

• B. Giffin, Assistant Plant Manager

• J. Giscion, Assistant Plant Manager, Support Services G. Goelzer, Shift Supervisor

• S. Joiner, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator

• W. Kelly, Regulatory Compliance Engineer

• W. Keyworth, Senior Power Production Engineer J. Schmitz, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator J. Skaggs,-Shift Technical Advisor

• E. Waage, Senior Nuclear Generation Engineer

• L. Womack, Assistant Plant Manager, Operations Services Others:

W. Adams, Administrator, French Hospital R. Cohen, Emergency Room Manager, French Hospital J, Hastie, Captain, San Luis Obispo County Sheriffs Office J. Rutledge, Battalion Chief, California Department of Forestry B. Stewart, Battalion Chief, California Department of Forestry

• Denotes attendance at the' April 7, 1989 exit interview Followup on Previous Inspection Findings (Module 92701)

(Closed) Open Item 89-04-0 Licensee needs to ensure that procedure revisions are inserted in manuals in ERFs in a timely manner so that all are consistent at all time Document Control has revised Desk Guide DCDG-4A (Revision 4 dated 3/21/89). The guide provides for each copy in each ERF to be updated within one working day of the issuance of a revised procedure. This action adequately addresses this concern. This item is close (Ciosed) Open Item IN-89-1 Repair and Use of HP The licensee has received and reviewed'this notice and, as a result, isfin the process of revising Procedure STP I-29b to reassign maintenance responsibility fro '

the NRC to the pla This iter 4 is close ( Open ) Open Item 89 04-0 Licensee needs to establish method for verifying the operability of site emergency alarms during testing. The licensee is in the process of revising STP G-17N to provide for quarterly verification of emergency alarms located outside the protected area and for annual verification of emergency alarms located inside the protecte are Progress in addressing this concern is satisfactory; however, this item will remain open pending implementation of procedure ;

L___z ___ ___

- - _ _ _ _ - -

. ..

'

'

- ,

n ..

-

s . Operational Status of'the Emergency Preparedness Program (Module .

82701) j l

The' inspector. reviewed the licensee's program for staffing and augmenting i the; emergency organization. Diablo Canyon uses a dedicated eight-line-automatic call system;to notify off-duty members of the emergency response organization. Key personnel are provided with portable

_

telephones so that they can be in continuous communications with the facility during transi Results of augmentation. drills andl exercises ,

/in'dicate that the licensee can augment the emergency organization within one hour of the declaration'of an emergency. The inspector concluded

.that the licensee maintains physical and administrative mechanisms to meet shift staffing and augmentation goals promulgated-in'NUREG-0737, Table 2,. Supplement The licensee's program to disseminate emergency preparedness informatio , annually to the public was reviewe In addition to an annual mail-out-of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant" Emergency. Information Booklet, the i

, licensee'also has.a full page advertisement in'the local telephone i directory and a semi-annual "Diablo Canyon Newsletter" which provides emergency response information. . Motels within the 10-mile emergency ,

planning zone (EPZ)'also display small placards in each room which advise

'

! -

occupants of action to take in the eventithe emergency siren is sounde The inspector concluded that'the licensee's program meets the. requirement of Section IV.D.2 of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, for yearly dissemination of basic emergency planning information'to'the public within the EP s The inspector interviewed staff members at three off-site agencies which F , had contracted to provide medical, fire and law enforcement support"to -

, the licensee during an emergency. These individuals are identified in Section 1 of this repor All three agencies expressed complete satis-fcction in their relationship with the licensee, and none offered an . negative criticism toward their affiliation with the licensee's emergency pla The licensee's dose assessment capabilities were <amined to determine the quality of. training and the effectiveness of the procedures for making dose projections. The inspector conducted a cose assessment

~

calculation walk-through with a shift technical advisor and a shift supervisor. Each was given an identicai set of data. Both appeared well trained in using Procedure R-2, completing their calculations within 15-minutes. The results were accurate and consistent with the results calculated using the principal manual dose assessment precedure, RB-1 The inspector concluded that the licensee's training and procedures were adequate to ensure that the licensee cou'fa p1 ovide time'ly and securate

- dose assessments in the event of an emergenc ;

[xitIntervQw The inspector held an exit interview or April 7, 1989 with 1tcensee representative Attendees of this interview are identified in Section 1

~

'

of this report. The licensee was advised that no violations or deviations were identified during this inspectio The findings and

-= = __-

_ _ _ _ _ . _ - , . _ , _ . .. _

_ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _

'-

-y ; - : 7. . - <-

.

,.. 4

-+ -

..r

+

..

. .." .

El -

i f' observationsdescribedinSection3ofthisreportwerealsodiscussed

-'-

' during this interview.'

ty .(

l'

f'.

,

p-.

j.

I g-

>

>

h

,

l l +

A

-...__._____n

--