IR 05000275/1998019
| ML16342A600 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1998 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16342A598 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-98-19, 50-323-98-19, NUDOCS 9812090277 | |
| Download: ML16342A600 (4) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 2 DOCUMENT CONTAINS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
Docket Nos.:
License Nos.:
Report No.:
Licensee:
Facility:
Location:
Dates:
Inspector(s):
Approved By:
50-275 50-323 DPR-80 DPR-82 50-275/98-19 50-323/98-19 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 7 1/2 miles NW of Avila Beach Avila Beach, California November 16-19, 1998 A. Bruce Earnest, Physical Security Specialist, Plant Support Branch Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Attachment:
Supplemental Information DOCUMENT CONTAINS 9812090277 981204 PDR ADOCK 05000275
PDR ENCI OSURE(S) CONTAIN(S) UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
-2-DOCUMENT CONTAINS E ECUTIVE SUMMARY Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Report 50-275/98-19; 50-323/98-19 This was an announced inspection of the licensee's physical security and access authorization programs.
The areas inspected includes: access control - personnel, packages, and vehicles; physical barriers - protected area; records and reports; security program audits; and review of previous inspection findings.
an Su ort Personnel access to the protected area was adequately controlled. Two metal detectors failed during performance testing. A followup item was identified involving the operable condition of the two metal detectors (Section S1.1).
A violation of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, Section A, and the licensee's training and qualification plan was identified involving the failure to perform'annual requalifications of warehouse personnel responsible for conducting material and package searches..
The licensee implemented proper corrective actions; therefore, no response to the violation is required (Section S1.2).
An effective vehicle access control program was in place (Section S1.3).
. The access authorization program was effectively implemented (Section S1.4).
The protected area barrier system met physical security plan requirements (Section S2.1).
An effective records and reporting system was in place for reporting safeguards events (Section S3.1).
Audits of the security, access authorization, and fitness-for-duty programs were effective, thorough, and intrusive (Section S7.1).
DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE(S) CONTAIN(S) UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
1