IR 05000285/1987006

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:33, 1 February 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 870522 & 0721 Ltrs Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-285/87-06
ML20237K953
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 08/13/1987
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 8708200017
Download: ML20237K953 (2)


Text

l q. ,

AUG 131987

,

In Reply Refer To:

Docket: 50-285/87-06 Omaha Public Power District ATTN: R. L. Andrews, Division Manager- ,

Nuclear Production

-

1623 Harney Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letters of May 22 and July 21, 1987, in response to our letters and Notice of Violation dated April 22 and June 19, 1987. We have reviewed.your reply and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We will review the implementation of your corrective

,

actions during a future inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.

Sincerely, Ocne 4 ,

J. 2. C N .;: .._

J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch cc:

W. G. Gates, Manager Fort Calhoun Station P. O. Box 399 Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023 Harry H. Voigt, Esq.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 (cc cont'd next page) i

!

FCS PI S RIV:EP M C:EP&Sh C: SP WLFi er PHHarrell/nc RPMullikin RACALDOELL LAYandt  ;

08/06/87 f/1/87 @/jo/87 /

fr /7 /87 l RPB j C:RP '

f DRHu r JEGagi/afdo g @ /87 g/}3/8' Q l 0k 8708200017 870813

{DR ADOCK 05000285 PDR s\

[: ,

8 5 Omaha Public Power District -2- .I

Kansas Radiation Control Program Director Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director  !

bec to DMB (IE04)

bec distrib. by RIV: j RPB RRI R. D. Martin, RA l R&SPB SectionChief(RP8/B) MIS System

,

RIV File DRSP RSTS Operator i RSB Project Inspector D. Weiss, RM/ALF

, R. Hall

!

,

j l

I

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

-_

- _._ _ _ _ . . _ _ . R l

. . <

!

SARCl!/.ES liHORMAll0N 1

{

Yi L

Omaha Public Power District  !

1623 Hamey Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 (

402/536 4000 i May 22, 1987 LIC-87-357 I ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S)

SATEGUARDS INFORMATION.

DECONTROL. LED WHEN l

,

SEPARATED FROM ATTACHMENT (S) J

!

Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3%hT/$1 L

' ~

Region Iv t

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 MAY M P

\,

.

Arlington, TX 76011

.

L, p References: 1. Docket No. 50-285 [- ._.._*

-

2.

Letter NRC (J. E. Gagliardo) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews) dated ~l

' April 22,1987 (IER 50-285/87-06) 1

Dear Mr. Gagliardo:

I i SUBJECT: Inspection Report 87-06 l

The subject inspection report identified one violation concerning a security matter.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, please find attached the Omaha Public Power District's response to this' violation.

The details of this response are deemed Safeguards Information in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21. As such, this document should not be placed in the Public Document Room.

If you have contact us. any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to

Sincerely, AW R. L. Andrews Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA/me Attachment c: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae w/o Attachment

.

R. D. Martin, NRC Regional Administrator w/o Attachment

'g W. A. Paulson, NRC Project Managerw/o Attachment P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector w/o Attachment xv a smaanmunev &,

. - . . .

'

.--...............-...

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - -

l I

< . , , 'j

.

--=~_======r=======--- - - - - = = = = = = . = = = = - = = =

^

.:=: -

_ _ . . _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ - . _ _ .

Omaha Public Power District i 1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 _ ,.

-

ggggg

_

402/536 4000

'

l [ .

July 21, 1987 JUL 2 41987 ,'O LIC-87-523 'g

'

."

_..J

]

Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief {

Reactor Projects Branch V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 References: 1. Docket No. 50-285 .

2. Letter NRC (J. E. Gagliardo) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews) dated April 22, 1987 (IER 50-285/87-06) l 3. Letter OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (J. E. Gagliardo) dated May 22, 1987 (LIC-87-357)

4. Letter NRC (J. E. Gagliardo)'to OPPD (R. L. Andrews) dated June 19, 1987 (IER 50-285/87-06) -1 l

Dear Mr. Gagliardo:

SUBJECT: Additional Information for Inspection Report 285/87-06 Omaha Public Power District recently received Reference 4 requesting

, supplemental information to that provided in Reference.3. Accordingly, please find attached additional information concerning Inspection Report 285/87-06.

Sincerely, i

l R. L. Andrews /d)

'

Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA:rge Attachment c: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae I 1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.  !

Washington, DC 20036 )

P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector li J7 4g!o=

y j,

,

R. D. Martin, Regional Administrator ,

l Qw ,TV 455t24 Emplograen th EQtt Opportunity /l  !

l

'

. , ,.

l l

Attachment

~

a. During the performance of the inspection, it was established that the violation occurred, in part, due to the security supervisor not responding i

'

to concerns identified by NRC personnel. This was not discussed in your '

response to the reason for the violation. It is requested that you provide a response to this aspect of the violation, i

RESPONE The reason for the violation was that the Supervisor-Security did not take !

appropriate action on the resident NRC inspector's concern about logging into vital areas with no card reader. His interpretation of the site security plan was that it adequately addressed logging into areas which is accomplished by the computer. He believed that OPPD was in compliance.

He was approached a second time about the discrepancy and responded by requiring a manual log be kept, but only at rollup doors without card readers. He did not address inoperative card readers or other vital area i doors without card readers.

!

On March 16, 1987, a security supervisor with a background in nuclear plant security was hired. A change was made to the security plan that !

addressed ways to log entry into vital areas through any door not equipped with card readers, doors with inoperative card readers or vital areas where access cannot be controlled by the computer. The new security supervisor has also discussed with lead security personnel the need to I

demonstrate a prompt response to any concern expressed by NRC personnel, b. In the discussion provided, the response stated that the reason for the i

violation was due to the fact that regulations stated in 10 CFR Part 73 had not been included in your site security plan or associated imple-menting procedures. Has a review been performed to identify other requirements stated in 10 CFR Part 73 that should be included in your site ,

security plan and associated implementing procedures? If not, it is !

requested that a reason be provided for not performing the review. If a !

review has been performed, it is requested that you provide details on the l extent and results of the completed review. J RfSPONSE A thorough review of the site security plan and 10 CFR Part 73 has been !

conducted for other discrepancies that may exist. A matrix of paragraphs from the site security plan was used to compare against 10 CFR Part 73. A review was completed in the Spring of 1986 and again in 1987. No further deficiencies were discovered.

c. It is requested that you address any new actions you have determined to be i appropriate for corrective steps which will be taken to prevent further !

violations, based on the results of your additional review performed on j Items a and b. Consideration of the generic aspects of the items is '

appropriate.

, ,

t _ __ _ _ ___

i

<.q

'

<,

l RESPONSE We believe the above actions are appropriate corrective steps and should  ;

prevent further violations in these areas. Generic aspects, as noted in '

Reference 3, will be emphasized to OPPD personnel to provide added assurance that NRC inspector concerns are appropriately addressed when i raised.  ;

i i

.

2

'

i i

l

,

l

!

l

!

l

!

<

,I i

i

! i I  !

!

! 1

l

!

I l

l

L--_------------_- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - -o