IR 05000285/1987006

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:36, 26 January 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Util Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-285/87-06. Requests Addl Info Re Review to Identify Other Requirements That Should Be Included in Site Security Plan
ML20216C886
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/1987
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20216C889 List:
References
NUDOCS 8706300393
Download: ML20216C886 (2)


Text

, ,

A., , , , s,

$

l

' : }, , AUN 191987 y

In Reply Refer To:'.

' Docket: .50-285/87-06-

.

,.

Omaha Public Power District"

' ATTN: R.-'L. Andrews, Division Manager-

~

, . . .

'

Nuclear. Production -

1623.Harney Street'

. 10maha, Nebraska' 68102

_

~ Gentlemen:1

,

I Thank you for your letter, dated May 22,'~1987, .in response 1tolour letter, dated April '22,1987., We continue'to'be in"need of' additional information as

'

' discussed with your Mse D. Munderloh 'at the site on June 8',1987. The additional information: requested is discussed belo During 'the' performance' of the inspection ~,'it was established that the' .

,

' violation l occurred,-in part, due to the security supervisor not responding to concerns. identified by NRC: personnel. This was not discussed in your

'

response to'the reason for the: violation. It is requested-that you provide a response;to this aspect of>the; violation.- ,

!

. In theldiscussiori provided, the resp'onse..s1!ated that' the reason.for. the

. violation was due to the fact that regulations stated in 10LCFR Part 73

'

ihad not'been included in.your, site 7secuhity plan 'or associated implementing procedures. Has a review been performed to identify other q (requirements stated in 10 CFR Part :73 that-should be Jincluded in:your site

' security plan and associated 1 implementing proceddres? If not, it is requested,that a reason be.provided for not performing the' review. If a review has been performed, it..isL requested 'that, you provide details on the

' extent and results oflthe-completed revie ,.

' It is. requested that you address:any new actions you have determined to be appropriate for corrective steps which will be taken to' prevent furthe violations, based on the results' of your additional ' review performed on

,

Items a and b. Consideration of the generic aspects'of the' items is.

rm appropriat Please provide the supplemental information within 30 days of the date of

'this lette

Sincerely, O@n:" Styy 9, J.E.Gagi;c(go .j J. E. Gagliardo, Chief '

Reactor Projects Branch cc: (seenextpage)

AfW ff& 9 C:RPBF(/'

'

S(I/FCS PI/FCS EP&SP ! C:EP& C:RPB/j PHarrell RMulliki RCald LYand - DHunte / JGaglia rdo ~

i

-

06/15/87 /e./6 /87- 6/ r//87 (c/p/87 6/d 'E d//QY h 8706300393 870619?

-

< PDR ADOCK 05000205 '

\

G PDR w +

f: . 4m ,

,

,

,

@ .. W ' ,4. ' j Mf = ..,

p - . ,,

-

-

,.

- m b o -

. .

,0maha Public Power District -2--

. ..

< ; f .

. .c c : <-

.W. G. Gates, Manager

.

' , ~ Fort Calhoun Statio .,

P.O. Box:399 , ,

Fort-Calhoun, Nebraska - 68023 t

,

Harry H.1Voigt, Es *

R,' -LeBoeuf, Lamb,'Leib9 & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue', NW

Washington, DCE 20036 KansasRadihtion. Control!ProgramDirector:

~

, Nebraika ' Radiation'Controll Program-D'irector

. -

w , <

. .

P becto:DMB'(IE14)y c, RPB-  ;

'

[jRRI'/ 3 ./ 'R.D. Martin,.RA

.RPSB' ,

' Sectio'n. Chief (RPB/B)

-

1 MIS. System:

,fDRSPcf1

'

'RIV File? ,

RSTS Operator . .

RSB Project: Inspector,.RPB :D. Weiss, RM/ALF-

R. Hall J'vNRR Project Man'ager

-

.;'

s

..

l E

,

x 2