ML20151U916

Forwards FEMA Transmitting 851009 Final Exercise Evaluation.No Deficiencies Affecting Public Health & Safety Identified.Approval Under FEMA Rule 44CFR350 Remains in Effect

ML20151U916
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	02/06/1986
From:	Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Larson C NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8602110147
Download: ML20151U916 (2)

Text

,_.

O FEB 6 $66 Docket No. 50-263 Northern States Power Company ATTN: Mr. C. .E. Larson Vice President, Nuclear Generation 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 Gentlemen:

We have received the enclosed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) letter dated January 21, 1986, and associated final exercise evaluations on the offsite emergency preparedness exercise conducted on October 9,1985.

~

This was a full participation exercise for Sherburne and Wright Counties and for the State of Minnesota. This final exercise evaluation lists several areas requiring corrective actions and areas recommended for improvement regarding the offsite emergency response plans for the area around the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant.

Based on the performance of the offsite agencies during the exercise, FEMA did not identify any deficiencies affecting public health and safety in the event of an accident at the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant. As a result, the approval under FEMA. Rule 44 CFR 350 will remain in effect.

We fully recognize that the recommendations to be implemented may involve actions by other parties and political institutions which are not under your direct control. Nonetheless, we would expect the subject of offsite preparedness for the area around the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant to be addressed by you as well as others.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

Sincerely,

' Original signed by U.D. Shafor" B602110147 e60206 3-ADOCK 050 fDR Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch

Enclosure:

As stated See Attached Distribution b

RIII RIII RIII  : RI h' y t\

%<f Patte n/jlk Phil'Yps Boyd afy jD /

(au

Northern States Power Company 2 FEB 6 Igg Distribution cc w/ enclosure:

W. A. Shamla, Plant Manager DCS/RSB(RIDS).

Resident Inspector, RIII'Monticello Resident Inspector,'RIII Prairie Island John W. Ferman,.Ph. D.,

' Nuclear Engineer, MPCA D. Matthews, EPB, OIE-

. 44,

~'1 # '

g Federal Emergency Management Agency 1 #

~

1. Washington, D.C. 20472 JW 2 l 126 MENORANDUM FOR: Fdward L. Jordan Director Division of Dnergency Preinredness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcenent U.S. clear atory Ccmnission FRCH: .

Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Prograns

SUBJECT:

Exercise Report of the October 9, 1985, Exercise of the Offsite Radiological Dnergency Preparedness Plans for the Monticello Nuclear Power Station Attached are two copies of the Exercise Report of the October 9,1985, joint exercise of the offsite radiological energency preparedness plans for the Monticello Nuclear Power Station. h is was a joint full participation exercise for the State of Minnesota and Sherburne and Wright Counties. We report dated November 22, 1985, was prepared by Region V of the Federal Dnergency Management Agency (FEMA).

There tere no deficiencies observed at the exercise. There were inadequacies identified requiring corrective actions; however, they did not detract fran the overall demonstrated capability to protect the health and safety of the public. The State is preparing a schedule of corrective actions. As soon as

~

they are received, we will send you a copy. h ver, since there were no identified impediments to protecting the public during the exercise, the approval under FEMA Rule 44 CFR 350 will remain in effect.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Pobert S. Wilkerson, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 646-2861.

Attachments as Stated r m ' a J Y'

,,ww, , , , e- v , . , , - - -

4 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant '

Northern States Power Conpany

. Joint Exercise ,

Facility Location: Located in the State of Minnesota in Wright County near the Town of Monticello,' Minnesota.

Exercise Date: ~ October 9, 1985 Date of Report: November 22, 1985

Participants:

21is was a full participation exercise for the State of Minnesota, Sherburne County, Wright County and Northern States Power Cor:pany

+

Federal' Emergency Management Agency Region V Natural and Technological Hazards Division 300 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 e

O 1

M rsn -

esu, -

\

t'.

?s e,

~

• TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS page 2 EXECUTIVE SIM1ARY page 3 ~

Staie of Minnesota .page 3

• Sherburne County page 3 .

Wright County page 4 EXENCISE REPORT page 5 Introduction page 5

1. Exercise Background page 5

2. Participating and Non-Participating State and Local Governnents page 5

3. List of Evaluators page 5

4. Evaluation Criteria page 6

5. Exercise Objectives page 6

6. Sunmary of scenario page 9

7. State and Local Resources' Planned To Be Used in the Exercise page 11

8. Exercise Findings in Past Exercises page 11

9. Exercise. Objectives Still To Be Effectively Achieved page 11 Narrative page 12. ,

1. State of Minnesota page 12

2. Sherburne County page 15

3. Wright County page 17 SLM1ARY LISTING OF EXERCISE FINDINGS . page 21 State of Minnesota

1. Deficiencies page 22

2. Areas Requiring Corrective Actions page 23

3. Areas Recormended for Inprovement page 24 Sherburne County

1. Deficiencies page 25

2. Areas Regairing Corrective Actions page 26

3. Areas Recommended for Inprovement page 27 Wright County

1. Deficiencies page 28

2. Areas Requiring Corrective Actions page 29

3. Areas Reconmended for Intprovement page 30 2

1

t

'I . .

EXECUTIVE SGNARY State of Minnesota ,

We State EOC staff has the capability to comunicate with the utility by a e dedicated lan31ina. W e initial call from the utility informing the State of an incident at the plant was received by the duty officer and alefting actioos were taken. The EOC was activated on a real time basis. We #

capab'ility exists t'o maintain a continuous operation. The State EDC was under the direction of an operations chief, briefings were held pe'riodically with the total staf f participating. The staff had written procedures I available. Message logs were up to date. We facilities were furnished with all the necessary amenities. We comunications systems are adequate in all areas. The Radiation Health group, Minnesota Department of Health demonstrated dose projections from plant release data and sinulated field monitoring tean data. Protective acticm reconendations were made for plume and ingestion pathway hazards. Public alerting and notification was initiated with systems activation simulated. Recovery and reentry decisions were comunicated to all response organizations. The public was informed of safety precautions and availabilfty of compensation for financial loss.

Activation and staffing of the Joint Public Inforration Center (JPIC) was demonstrated. State government agencies, Northern States Power Conpany, Wright County and the City of Menticello were represented. Sherburne County representatives were not present.- The representatives from Wright County and Monticello were not fully utilized.

The facilities and comunications systems available to the information staff and the media are adequate. Six media briefings were conducted. They were coordinated, complete, accurate and avoided technical language. Necessary maps and displays were available and used by briefers. Kits containing background information on nuclear power, radiation and the local area were not available in the JPIC. Hard copy of Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) messages, other State releases and briefing statements were not available in the JPIC. Systems to monitor broadcast releases and correct misinformation were not deaonstrated. The rumor control system was not dmonstrated during this exercise.

Sherburne County Real time alerting and staffing was demonstrated and included conversion of a conference room into an operations rocrn. At 0822, when the'" ALERT" classification was received, the sheriff's dispatcher notified the Dnergency Operations Center (EOC) staff members to report to the EOC. The EOC was fully staffed and functioning at 0900.

Dnergency classificatbn levels were clearly posted. Status boards were clearly disolayed as v?re all required maps and charts. All staff members had telephones availatD.e. Datafax to the State EOC and Wright County EOC, radio remote from the %tility and a sheriff's dispatch radio were operated from the operations rocm.

At 9954, the County was directed by the State to sound sirens innediately tive actions being

, due to the "GEEPAL DiERGENCY" and the protec

, inplemented. 'I se activation of the prompt alert and notification system was sinulated at 09 i7.

3

d ..

S e EOC staff coordinated and directed activities associated with inplementing evacuation instructions issued by the State at 0954. Special evacuation considerations, such as assisting mobility impaired persons, were handled as routine and presented'no problems. ,

mere were no schools within the sectors'at risk, with the result that procedures for school evacuation were not demonstrated. Wis was an exe'rsise objective.- This objective must be demonstrated during theanext exercise.

I RecEryandreentryactionswerekeyedoninstructionsfromtheState.

When' protective actions were relaxed, the County EOC staff initiated proceduures to return to normal operations.

Wricht County At approximately 0821, the Wright County disp-tch office was advfsed of an incident at the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. Lack of details concerning'the extent of the situation, during the initial call, necessitated the County recalling the plant to obtain the additional information. By 0831, the condition at the plant escalated to a " SITE AREA IMERGLNCY". The County demonstrated the ability to notify their staff and to activate the EOC. Based on a staffing roster, the County could maintain staffing around the clock. The EOC staff made effective use of the facility, appropriate displays, and connunications sytems to arrive at

-decisions and to coordinate emergency activities.

We County demonstrated, by simulation, the ability to manage an orderly evacuation of approximately 3,500 residents and to remove any potential ,

impediments to traffic flow. A hospital, twenty child care centers, as well as a number of nursing homes, were included in tne evacuated zone.

% e Monticello EOC was required to evacuate and relocated to the County EOC. The Monticello staff menbers were checked for possible contamination inside the Wright County EOC after they arrived. Had they been contaminated they would have contaminated the County EOC. However, this was determined to be a result of the scenario not including a demonstration of the decontamination center. During an actual emergency the relocating personnel would report to the decontamination center before reporting to the Wright County EOC.

Although provided sufficient time, the EOC staff did not fully discuss the potential problems and anticipated solutions associated with recovery and reentry activities. It is necessary that this be acconplished during the next exercise.

e 4

EXERCISE REPORT Introduction 1

1. Exercise Background - .

his was the fifth joint exercise for the State of Minnesota, Sherburne Counstf, Wright County .and Northern States Power Conpany resulting (Wom a simulated accident at the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. Earlier exercises were held on January 7,1981, March 2,1982, February 23,~1983 and December 5, 1984. This report addresses the October 9,1985 joint full participation exercise.

2. Participating and Non-participating State and Local Governments

% e ten mile plume exposure emergency planning zone (EPZ) of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant includes portions of Sherburne County and of Wright County. A major portion of the City of Monticello is within the ten mile EPZ. The State of Minnesota and both counties participated in this exercise for evaluation. We City of Monticello participated in the exercise for training purposes and not for evaluation. Observer connents concerning the City of Monticello are included in this report to recognize their .

participation, evaluate actions in Wright County that were inpacted. by the City of Monticello activity and assist State and local planners by providing suggestions for possible inprovement and recognition of procedures that were effective.

3. List of Evaluators For this exercise, there was a total of ten Federal evaluators observing off-site exercise activities. On-site activities were evaluated by a separate team from the Nuclear Regulatory Contnission (NRC). Of the off-site evaluation team, eight evaluators, including the off-site Evaluation Team

'I%ro Chief, were Federal Dmrgency Management Agency (FEMA) Region V staff.

evaluators were staff members from Argonne National Laboratory (Atl) . An additional person from ANL accompanied the evaluation team in a training capacity.

% e evaluator assignments were as follows:

Wallace Weaver, FDiA Off-Site Exercise Evaluation Team Chief Ed Robinson, FEMA Minnesota State Team Leader Walter O'Keefe, FEMA State Team Menber (ECC)

Don lfulet, ANL State Team Member (EOC)

State Team Member (JPIC) Ray Kellogg, FEMA Sherburne County Team TAader Rick Anthony, FDiA Woodie Curtis, FDiA Sherburne County Team Member (CCC)

Sherburne County Team Member (Field Activities) Sue Ann Curtis, ANL Wright County Team Leader Bob Shapiro, FEMA Wright County Team Member Wiley Howell, FEMA-Don Jankowski, ANL Observer 5

, 4. Evaluation Crit;ris

. '1he plans that were evaluated during this exercise were developed .using the

" Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Dnergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants" (NUREG-0654-FEMA ,

REP-1, Revision 1). Therefore, these criteria and the modules based on these criteria entitled, " Modular Format for Uniformity of Radiologital Dnergency Preparedness Exercise Observations and Evaluation," dated June 198T; were used for exercise evaluation. -4

. 4

5. Exercise Objectives I-Objectives for this exercise' were selected from among the FDM thirtyfive standard objectives listed in Tab "M" of the " Modular Format for Uniformity of Radioiogical Emergency Preparedness Exercise Observations and Evaluation", dated June 1983. The objective numbers listed below correlate to Tab "M".

'Ihe State of Minnesota selected the following fourteen objectives for demonstration during the exercise.

1. . Dertenstrate ability to nobilize staff and activate facilities pronptly.

2. Demonstrate ability to fully staff facilities and maintain staffing around the clock.

3. Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency activities.

4. 'Dernonstrate adequacy of facilities and displays to support emergency operations.

5. Denonstrate ability to conrnunicate with all appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel.

10. Demonstrate ability to project dosage to the public via plume exposure, based on plant and field data, and to determine protective measures, based on PAGs, available shelter, evacuation time estimates, and all other appropriate factors.

11. Demonstrate ability to project dosage to the public via ingestion pathway exposure, based on field data, and to determine appropriate protective measures, based on PAGs aryl other relevant factors.

12. Dernonstrate ability to inTplement protective actions for ingestion pathway hazards.

13. Demonstrate ability to alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ, and disseminate an initial instructional message, within 15 minutes, .

14. Demonstrate ability to form late and distribute appropriate instructions to the public in a timely fashion.

~

6

24. Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a clear, accurate and

- timely manner.

25. Demonstrate ability to provide advance coordination of information released. - .

26. Demonstrate ability to establish and operate rumor control in a

-t coor&inated fashion. .

35. Demonstrate ability to determine and implement appropriate ~ measures '

for controlled recovery and reentry.

Sherburne County selected the following fourteen objectives for demonstration during the exercise.

1. Demonstrate ability to mobilize staff and activate facilities prow tly.

2. Demonstrate ability to fully staff facilities and' maintain staffing around the clock.

3. Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate e w rgency activities.

4. Demonstrate adequacy of. facilities and displays to support emergency operations.

5. Demonstrate ability to com,unicate with all appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel. ,

13. Demonstrate ability to alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ, and disseminate an initial instructional message, within 15 minutes.

15. Deronstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to manage an orderly evacuation of all.or part of the plume EPZ.

16. Dmonstrate the organizatiional ability and resources necessary to deal with impediments to evacuation, such as inclement weather or traffic obstructions.

17. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to control access to an evacuated area.

18. Dmonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to effeet an orderly evacuation of mobility igaired individuals within the plume EPZ.

19. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation of schools within the plume EPZ. .

24. Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a clear, accurate and timely manner.

25. Demonstrate ability to provide advance coordination of information released.

7

35. Demonstrate ability to determine and i g lement appropriate measures for controlled recovery and reentry.

Wright County selected the following fif teen objectives for demonstration during the exercise. ,

..l. Demonstrateabilitytomobilizestaffandactivatefacilitjes.

~

pronq5tly.

2. Demonstrate ability ~to fully staff facilities and maintain staffing around the clock.

3. Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency

,. activities.

4. Denonstrate adequacy of facilities and displays to support energency operations.

5. Demonstrate ability to comunicate with all appropriate locations, organizatior.s, and field personnel.

13. Demonstrate ability to alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ, and disseminate an initial instructional message, within 15 minutes.

15. Demonstrate the organizational ability arx! resources necessary to manage an orderly evacuation of all or part of the plune EPZ.

16. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to deal with im ediments to evacuation, such as inclement weather or traffic obstructions.

17. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to control access to an evacuated area.

18. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation of mobility i@ aired individuals within the plume EPZ.

19. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation of schools within the plume EPZ.

24. Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a clear, accurate and timely manner. -

25. Demonstrate ability to provide advance coordination of information released.

33. Demonstrate ability to relocate to and operate the alternate EOC.

('Ihis will be demonstrated by the City of Monticello EOC relocating.to the Wright County EOC.)

35. Demonstrate ability to determine and i g lement appr'priate o measures for controlled recovery and reentry.

8

+ ,; .

. 6.~ Sumnary of scenario S e Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant _ radiological emergency preparedness exercise objectives and scenario for the Oct 9, 1985 joint _ full i- participation exercise were developed by exercise planners from the

. Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and the State of Minnesota Division of anergency. Services. S e exercise planners participated in the exercise but

{ protected the_ scenario from the other participants of the exercise ,so they 0 -woul6 not be award of the scenario events. ,

FDE Region V participated in discussions with the utility and State planners in July 1985 to select the objectives and determine the scope of the' exercise. Review of previous exercise deficiencies was made by FDR in

,, order to develop a scenario that would allow demonstration of past exercise deficiencies as well as. allow denonstration of exercise objectives selected

, by the exercise participants.

Sutanission of the scenario was according to deadlines outlined in NRC and FD% guidelines. Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Conpany, Incorporated, reviewed the off-site portion of the scenario for FDM and found it provided sufficient exercise activity and field monitoring controller data to test most of the off-site objectives. A possible exception involving State Objective 11 was discussed with State of Minnesota planners by telephone on October 3, 1985. Based on the scenario, it appeared that following the termination of the exercise airborne release, the I-131 ground deposition i concentrations would not be high enough to produce peak I-131 concentrations in milk that would be in excess of the preventive PAG derived response

-limit. In event this con:entration did not exceed the PAG limit, the State

. could still attain the objective through discussion in the EOC of preventive .

measures that should be considered. It was suggested, also, that the -

measurement units in controller message nunber 44 at 0950 hours0.011 days <br />0.264 hours <br />0.00157 weeks <br />3.61475e-4 months <br /> be verified for correctness. S e message indictes micro-curies per second while the counts per second rate indicated in the scenario time line was probably correct. It was noted, also, that message number 48 did not contain units.-

m is-information was relayed by datafax on October 3, 1985, to Minnesota DES

, planners in an attenpt to call it to the attention of the utility controllers.

Initial conditions provided by the scenario were:

, 1. Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant is operating at full power.

2. All identified leakages = 0.75 gpm and unidentified leakages = 0.5 gpm (and steady) . .

3. % e plant has been experiencing problems with turbine vibration and control rod exercise times are slower than normal but still within specifications.

4. Wind is out of the NNW (306 degrees) at 8 nph and tenperature is 65 degrees Farenheit. No precipitation is in the forecast. Stability Class F.

5. HPCI did not pass operability test and is down for short term amintenance. (presently not available)

At 9895, Low tevel Reactor Scram is initiated by loss of feedwater flow, due to loss of reactor feed punps on low suction pressure, til CRD putp trips off on low suction pressure. Two minutes later, 43 control rods did not insert completely into the reactor core and 22 adjacent rods are still full i out. " ALERT" should be declared based on Guideline #12; may declare " SITE AREA EMERGENCY" based on Guideline.912.

9 .

i

1 .. .,

At 9819, Reactor Low Low level initiates RCIC, MSIV close on Low' Low Reactor

+

water level. Relief valve E, Low Low set lifts and fails' to open with PM=nt tail pipe break. Drywell pressure greater than 2 psig - RHR containment spray operating abnormally. Operators initiate SBLD injecting.  :

. boron poison in Reactor. Vessel. Reactor tcTerature and reactor pressure j '

are decreasing. By 0820, Standy liquid control tank level is not decreasing. At 0835, " SITE AREA D(ERGENCY" should be declared based on l Guidirline #12 with failure to scram and loss of Standby Liquid conttol. l At 9999, indicated reactor flux levels increase rapidly. Reactor goes critical. All EOC-EDF-TSC should be activated. At 9930, primary I.

containment radiation levels increasing rapidly. " GENERAL DERGENCY" declared.

By 9945, operators regain operability of SBLD and begin injecting boron

. poison. As a result of primary continment breach through crack in penetrating pipe on Combustible Gas Control Division I secondary contairrnent goes airborne. At 1005, off-gas stack alarm setpoint reached at 90,003 cps. At 1130, the plume release requires Monti allo EOC to be evacuated and the EDF considers evacuation based on offsite doses. The operators continue boron poison injection and the reactor goes suberitical at 1145. 'Ihe offsite release continues.

At 1215, the exercise is advanced one day to:

(1) reactor cooldown (2) 43 control rods still remain out of core. Reactor suberitical by boron injection.

(3) Relief valve E still indicates open.

(4) SBGr continues to operate. Offsite releases have subsided to less than 1 times 10 to the 4 micro curies.

(5) Wind is out of the N!N (320 degrees) at 6 nph and temperature is 60 degrees Farenheit.

(6) Dnergency classification is still at " GENERAL DERGEtCY".

At 1315, the emergency classification is downgraded to " SITE AREA DERGE CY" and, at 1330, the exercise time is advanced two weeks. At this time the reactor is at cold shutdown, off-site releases are at normal levels and the emergency classification has become " ALERT". .

By 1345, recovery phase is inplemented at the plant. The exercise is terminated at 1525.

The events occurred as planned. 'Ihe State verified conditions at the plant and notified the local jurisdictions of the " ALERT" at 0822, the " SITE AREA D4ERGDCY" at 0831 and the " GENERAL DERGDCY" at 0954. The public alerting and notification network, including the EBS, was activated within three to four minutes, which is well within the fifteen minute standard of NUREG-9654. Inplementation of protective actions was timely throughout the exercise. All exercise locations recognized that the wind shift which occurred during the first ' time junp resulted in additional sectors being affected by the protective action re w .aadations. The inpact of this wind shift had not been fully considered during the scenario development. 'Ihe exercise participants are consnended for the actions taken to modify the protective actions to account for this situation.

- 10 i

9

,___y, ._,,y . . . _ . , ,

~.

7. State and Local Resources Planned To Be Used in the Exercise During this exercise the State planned to use the State anergency operations Center and the Joint Public Information Center both located in the State 8 Capitol Building, St. Paul. The State also planned to use the necessary communications systems and staffing to conduct emergency operations and support Sherburne County and Wright County.

5 lk. .

Sherburne County planned to use their County Bnergency operations. Center _ and g l

necessary comunications systems to support their EOC staff. Wright County planned to use their County Dnergency Operations Center located in the l County Courthouse at Buffalo. '! hey also planned to use available comunications systems and human resources necessary to meet exercise

.. objectives. 'the City of Monticello planned to use their Dnergency Operations Center, available connunications systems and human resources

.necessary to meet exercise objectives.

8. Exercise Findings in Past Exercises

'lhere were no deficiencies noted for the State of Minnesota, Sherburne County and Wright County during the radiological emergency preparedness exercise _of Deceter 5, 1984. 'Ihere were no areas requiring corrective actions noted in the State of Minnesota.- In Sherburne County, there were six areas requiring corrective actions and, in Wright County, there were three areas requiring corrective actions. All nine areas previously identified as requiring corrective actions were_ fully demonstrated during this exercise.

9. Exercise Objectives Still To Be Effectively Achieved , ,

'Ihe State of Minnesota fully demonstrated eleven of their fourteen selected exercise objectives. Two objectives (#1 and #14) were partially demonstrated. Objective 426 was not demonstrated. Sherburne County fully demonstrated eleven of the fourteen selected exercise objectives. Objective

1. 19 was not demonstrated because there were no schools in the area-at risk.

Two objectives (#24 and $25) were not demonstrated at the JPIC because Sherburne County was not represented there. Wright County fully demonstrated thirteen of the fifteen selected exercise objectives. Two objectives (#5 and #35) were partially demonstrated.

The objectives noted above must be demonstrated during the next biennial exercise. In addition, the following three objectives have not been fully demonstrated during the current exercise cycle and est also be demonstrated during the next biennial exercise.

21. Denonstrate the ability to make the decision, based on preJetermined criteria, whether to issue KI to emergency workers and/or the general population.

22. Demonstrate the ability to supply 'and adninister KI once the decision has been made to do so.

29. Demonstrate adequate equipment and procedures for decontamination of emergency workers, equipment and vehicles.

- 11

Narrative

l. State of Minnesota Activation and Staffing a De direct comunication link with the utility is by dedicated land Itne.

Calls.,are received by the duty officer. W e line is monitored around the clock 7 Se call fr6m the. Shift .Ihergency Cormunicator at the plant das received by the Division of anergency Services duty officer at 9813 and' ,

verifired at 0822. De duty officer used the written call list to notify the l B

appropriate State agencies and individuals within the Division of Ehergency Services. The EOC was completely staffed by representatives of the agencies listed in the State plan by 0920.

Bnergency Operations Management h e emergency operations management on the State level was carried out with close regard to the written plan. Effective periodic sumaries were made.

Inportant announcements were made as events occurred. The status board and maps were clear and well placed for observation. Copies of- the State Plan and SOPS were on hand. W e operation was adjusted to the space available.

Personnel are knowlegeable and trained. It is apparent that the management group could operate in a real situation. There was interaction between the agencies.

Facilities We operations roo:t is small in square footage, but was arranged to gain the most effective use of the space. All maps, event and status boards were, clearly marked and placed for easy access and sight. We chair, phone and table arrangements permitted easy movement and information exchange.

Comunications were easily accessible.

Communications We primary comunication link between the utility and the State EOC is a -

dedicated telephone. The State uses hard copy as th'e primary means of comunication with the counties. We State media briefing room is located on the floor above the EOC. The coordination of news releases takes place within the EOC. Comunications with schools, hospitals and ambulances is a County responsibility. The radiological monitoring teams are contacted by radio. .

Dose Assessment and Protective Action Rh.widations Methods, systems and equipment, as identified in the plan, were used by the Radiation Health group of the Minnesota Department of Health to demonstrate dose projections from plant release data and field monitoring team data. -

Calculations were prompt and agreed with Northern States Power ,

calculations. Monitors' field data was transmitted to the EOC by radio where it was plotted on maps. Field teams moved to additional monitoring locations. Estimates of total population exposure were prepared in the EOC.

12 O

e

Protective action recomnendations were made for plume and ingestion ~ pathway hazards. These recomnendations were based on EPA guidelines. The escalation of the incident at the plant pronpted evacuation and shelter orders, which were issued prior to any release at the plant. Protective 8 action reconcendations were changed as conditions changed. - ,

Potassium iodide (KI) is available for emergency workers and selected l

popul'stions groups,.but, in accordance with a policy established by the I Minnesota Department of Health, is not available to the general population.

Monitpring teams have KI in their equipmnt kits. I Public Alerting and Instructions An EBS message which was general in nature was sent out at 0845. The State EOC staff members participated in public alerting to the extent of calling Sherburne and Wright Counties directing them to activate the prompt alert and notification system. They also drafted and sent out an EBS message giving instructions for evacuation and sheltering at 0944. Another EBS message was sent at 0959 which gave a general description of the areas to be evacuated and areas to be sheltered.

AREA RECCNMENDED FOR IMPROVmENT: The prescripted messages used in the EBS message should be specific as to the geographic boundaries for the areas to be evacuated or sheltered. Additionally, they should include instructions to the transient population and information concerning closing of windows, shutting off ventilation systems arxi other pre-departure actions.

'Ihe _ State Department of Agriculture had available information concerning the location of farms, food processing and dairy plants and water intake points. Crop information was also available. Recomendations to farmers and food processing and dairy plants were made to the Department of Agriculture by the Department of Health, Radiation Health group. 'Ihese recomnendations were based on plant release data and milk and water sa@les. According to EOC staff, there are County agriculture officers that normally work with the farmers and food workers who would assist in the inplementation of protective actions.

Protective Action Not an objective for the State of Minnesota during this exercise.

Radiological Exposure Control Not an objective for the State of Minnesota during this exercise.

Media Relations Evaluators were informed by the State at the pre-exercise briefing that both Eright and Sherburne Counties would be repre,sented at the JPIC.

Representatives from Wright County and the City of Monticello, although prepositioned, were present at the start of the exercise. They participated in briefings in the operations room and attended the media b'riefings. They did not participate as spokespersons during the media briefings. Sherburne County was not represented in the State EOC or the JPIC. Spokespersons from various State sgencies and the utility arrived following notification.

13 e

o . . ,

A shift change was an objective of the exercise. Wis was not demonstrated by a change of staff, double staffing or the presentation of a roster showing continuous staffing capability. ,

IB G.4.a. Sherburne County must be AREA REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION:

represented at the JPIC and participate in the coordination of information which is released to the media.

,3 L ~u~

A.4. A shift change of the staff at the AREA REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: -

JPIC alst be demonstrated at the next biennial exercise.

AREA RECQHENDED FOR IMPROVDdENh: Representatives from local units of government could be utilized as spokespersons in the JPIC.

We PIO work areas are located adjacent to the operations room in the EOC.

W e JPIC is located on the floor above in the Captiol briefing room. Maps and displays were available and used by briefers during their presentations. All EOC communications resources are available to the PIOS and media briefers. Normal Capitol briefing room comunications are available for the media.

Six media briefings were held between 0940 and 1500. Briefings were coordinated and technical jargon was avoided or explained. Media kits containing background information were not available at the media briefing room.

AREA REX'GEENDED FOR IMPROVIMENT: Kits containing background infornation on nuclear power, radiation, etc., should be available at the JPIC.

Hard copy of.EBS releases and other releases were not available in the media briefing rocxn. (Northern States Power did provide copies of tneir releases.) Systems for monitoring radio and TV broadcasts were not demonstrated nor was the system to rectify errors in information received by the public.

The rumor control function was not demonstrated. A discussion with the individual identified as being responsible for the activity indicated that there was one phone with four lines available for conducting rumor control.

Wis person indicated that the runor control phone number had been made available to the media two or three weeks earlier at tne annual media briefing and would not be republished. We. person responsible for performing this function is also responsible for preparing news releases.

AREAREQUIRINGCORRE'TIVEAbTION: E.7. Hard copy of EBS messages, other State releases and briefing statements should be made available to the media at the JPIC.

AREA REOUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: G.4.c.

Systems to monitor broadcast information and correct misinformation should be demonstrated during the next exercise. W e State rumor control system must be demonstrated during the next exerci::e. .

14 D

e

Recovery and Reentry Recovery and reentry procedures demonstrated allowed entry into evacuated areas to take care of essential services. The State EOC staff relayed the recovery and reentry decision to all response organizations. Se public was ,

provided with information about safety precautions and availability of -

coupensation for financial losses.

~ *

2. 'Sherburne Countk Activation and Staffing 1-At 98'22, when notified of " ALERT", the County Sheriff's dispatcher verified the message and began notifications of the EDC staff.. his corrected a deficiency noted during the previous exercise. A written call list is maintained current and was used during staff alerting. mis action corrected a deficiency noted during the previous exercise. The EOC was fully staffed at 0900.

Twenty four hour staffing capability was reflected by a call-up type roster with at least two names per EDC staff position. Some positions had several names. The roster included other unassigned, but available, personnel.

Bere is a dedicated telephone line from the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant to the Sherburne County Sheriff's Comnunications/ Dispatcher Center at Elk River, Minnesota. SOPS and excerpts of the dispatcher responsibilities from the County plan were in the Dispatcher Center. They were used by the dispatch center staff. Their presence and use corrects an area requiring corrective action noted during the 1984 exercise. .

.Dnergency Operations Management A member of the County Board was present in the EOC and actively participated in the exercise. He monitored activities and, on at least one occasion, took timely action to question, verify and correct information that could have caused serious error if it had gone uncorrected. The County Civil Defense Director served as Chief of Operations to direct and coordinate response activities. EOC staff members contributed expertise and resources as appropriate. Staff was knowledgeable and was able to anticipate possible sit.2ations and plan, to some extent, actions that would be necessary.

Periodic briefings were conducted to keep staff members abreast of the situation. Staff members participated in the briefings to explain their respective responsibilities and activities. The staff was actively involved in decision making with major decisions being made try the Chairman of the County Board. Copies of the County plan were available in the EOC for reference. A majority of the staff had excerpts and checklists from the plan that pertained to their respective functions. Message handling included staff and capability to make copies as necessary. Messages received in the EOC were logged, copied and given to the proper staff member. The handling of messages within the EOC corrects the area requiring corrective action noted during the 1984 exercise.

15 a

4

+ = -

Access to the EOC was controlled by personnel of the County Sheriff's

- Department thru the use of access rosters, personal identification and sign-in/ sign-out logs. .

a Facilities Se County EOC is approximately thirteen miles from the Monticello Nu~ clear Generating Plant and is situated in the basement level of the County SheriYf's Department. It has a generator for back-up power, showef Iooms, bunks and means for acquiring and/or preparing food. W e EOC can support an extended operation. W e operations room provided seating and work space for E all of the staff. Noise did not become a problem at any time during the exercise. Telephones for all staff were operational by the time the staff reoorted into the EOC. Datafax to the State EOC and Wright County EOC,'

radio remote from the utility and sheriff's dispatch radio were operated from the operations room.

We status board was posted. Classification levels were clearly displayed.

All required maps and charts were available and used during the exercise.

De maps depicted the pltrne EPZ, with sectors labeled, evacuation routes, relocation centers, access control points, radiological monitoring points, and population by evacuation areas. Staff members used copies of the current plan as a reference. mis action corrected an area regairing corrective action noted during the 1984 exercise.

Corrnunications All required comunications capabilities were available in the cperations room and were demonstrated or explained during the exercise.

Dose Assessment and Protective Action Reconvendations Dose assessment and protective action re m mendations are the responsibility of the State Health Department. The County responded to the protective action recomendations received from the State.

Public Alerting and Instruction At 0954, the County was directed by the State EOC to sound sirens irmediately due to the " GENERAL DiERGENCY" and the protective actions being inplemented. We sirens were simulated at 0957. W e State advised the County that EBS had been activated and appropriate instructions for the public had been announced. .This fulfilled the County's selected objectives relative to this activity.

Protective Action At 0914, the County was notified that the plant was evacuating all non-essential on-site personnel. Assistance was not requested. The County EOC staff used this information as a basis to plan for a possible eyacuation

~

involving the public. ,

16 G

9 m

q' .. ..

At 9954, the State directed evacuation of all sectors to two miles, sectors

~

The F, G and H to five miles and shelter these sectors Sefive to ten Sheriff miles.

and Engineer County ordered the evacuation to be inplemented. ,

coordinated establishing road blocks and traffic access control in sector F, which affected Sherburne County. W e agricultural extension agent assistod in identifying need to protect livestock. S e agricultural extension agent

_depar,ted the EOC soon after this involvement.

According to staff sufficient resoGrces are available to acconplish the evacuation and traffic coAtrol tasks. W e Sheriff requested a Civil Air Patrol overflight to survey theWe  ;

evacuated area and was advised that the area was closed to air traffic. I' State Patrol flew the mission. -County Social Services has a listing of mobility inpaired persons and knew that none were within the evacuated area. A farmer's wife and one other person requested transportation assistance from within the area and were assisted through coordinated effort of social services and the Sheriff. There are no schools within the evacuated area in this County. Social Services estimated 1950 persons were evacuated. W e County Sheriff determined and verified that evacuation was conplete at 1100.

The situation presented no AREA REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: J.10.g.

opportunity for the County to demonstrate evacuation of a school. We objective remains to be demonstrated in the next exercise.

On Exercise Day Two, the protected area was expanded resulting in an adjustment of access control, as well as review by other staff agencies.

Staff briefings were conducted to insure monitoring of activities.

Radiological Exposure Control Countypatrolmenmanningtrafficaccesscontrolpointswereissueddosi$etry kits containing geigher counters with headphones and probes, chargers, mid-and high-range dosimeters, TLDs and instructions for use. mese actions exceeded the requirements of the objectives selected for this exercise.

Media Relations Public information activities were to be demonstrated at the JPIC and are discussed in the' Media Relations section under the State of Minnesota.

Recovery and Reentry When Recovery and reentry actions were keyed by instruction from the State.

protective actions were relaxed, access control points were removed and l Sheriff's officers were agencies were notified that persons could reenter. State Patrol coordinated with the Sheriff in the area to assist.

County Engineer in removal of roadblocks.

3. Wright County Activation and Staffing At approximately 0821, the utility notified the Wright County Sheriff's Dispatch that an emergency was declared at the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. Were-was difficulty in obtaining details of the emergency during the initial call so the Dispatcher called back to obtain additional-I information.

17,

~ , - - , - , - , - - - - -

, , - n -.,-r - - - , - - , c ,, ---

s. ,

AREA REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: F.1.a. W e Wright County Dispatch office

- had to call back to obtain inportant information. Procedures to receive initial information concerning plant conditions nest be reviewed and , steps taken to eliminate the possibility of missing vital information concerning emergency conditions at the plant and actions required by the County. j At 9831, the County was advised by the utility that the-emergency had '

escalated to a " SITE AREA DtERGENCY". 'We Dispatcher inplemented .ttp notification list to activate the County EOC. This procedure was empleted by 08,52 and the EOC was fully staffed at 0930.

'Nentyfour hour staffing capability was demonstrated by a partial shift charge and the presentation of a roster of personnel who would represent the organizations necessary to maintain a couplete staff at the EOC.

Se dispatch office verified the messages received from the utility by call back procedures. A copy of the County Warning Plan, as well as a checklist, was.used to notify the appropriate staff during an emergency. This corrects two deficiencies noted during the previous exercise.

Emergency Operations Management AF stated in the. plan, the Civil Defense Director was in charge of the emergency response. Periodic briefings were conducted by the Director and individual status reports were given by each of the organizational representatives. The noise level created by telephones and radio transmissions detracted from the periodic briefings.

AREA RD~0tEDCED FOR IMPROVEMD3T: Some procedures for noise control within the operations room would be helpful.

Protective action recomendations to shelter sectors F, G and H from 5 ta 10 miles and evacuate a 2-mile radius as well as sectors F, G and H out to 5 miles was implemented by the County. Due to a wind change, Sectors D and E were added to these protective action recomendations later.

W e County simulated the actions necessary to evacuate 150 persons from the ,

Monticello hospital, 100 from nursing homes and 20 from child care centers. ,

Activation of the fairgrounds as a reception center was also simulated. It was estimated that some 3,492 would have evacuated from the affected sectors should this situation have been a real one.

Facilities .

De Wright County EOC is located on the first floor of the County building.

Se room has the furniture, lighting and space to support the EOC staff.

Se status board was posted. Classification levels were clearly displayed.

All required maps and charts were available and used during the exercise.

2.e maps depicted the plume EPZ, with sectors labeled, evacuation routes, ,

relocation centers, access control points, iadiological monitoring points, and population by evacuation areas. Staff members used copies of the current plan as a reference. 2 is action corrected an area requiring corrective action noted during the 1984 exercise.

~

18 9-0

Cmenunications

%e County has the primary and backup comunications systems described in Annex B of their plan available for use. W ese systems enable them to comnonicate with the State EOC, utility, other County EOCs and othes.

organizations providing support to the emergency response.

. 6 Dose ~ Assessment and Protective Action Recomendations Doserassessment and protective action recomendetions are the responsibility of the State Health Department. W e County responded to the protective action recomendations received from the State.

,. Public Alerting and Instruction' At 0955, the County was directed by the State EOC to sound sirens imediately due to the " GENERAL D1ERGENCY" and the protect.'ve actions being inplemented. The sirens were simulated at 0958. The State advised the County that EBS had been activated and appropriate instructions for the

, public had been announced. This fulfilled the County's selected objectives

. relative to this activity.

~ Protective Action Wright County procedurely demonstrated their ability to establish traffic and access points. Following the notification of a "GDIERAL EMERGENCY",

simulated traffic control points were established by State and County '

organizations. These points were reported to be barricaded and manned by i police units. h ey were moved in response to the escalating emergency ,

situation and demands for traffic management. Le County established a total of twelve points while the State manned a total of four points. The agencies responsible for traffic control coordinated their activities.

We City of Monticello was affected by the order to evacuate, therefore, the EOC staff left their facility at 1916. Se designated relocation site was the Wright County Courthouse. As specified in the plan, the relocated staff utilized the Wright County EOC operations area sinultaneously with the county staff. Three officials relocated,~the CD Director, his assistant and the Sheriff Department liaison. Two other staff were dispatched to the State IDC ard the others were released. Released staff were requested to remain on standby in case they were required for another shift at the relocated EOC.

- The Civil Defense Director, as specified in the plan, represented the punicipality. h is individual provided backup to the county and addressed any issue that affected the comunity. During the portion of the exercise that Monticello' City EOC staff were relocated, they were involved in minimal activities. Se County EOC operations area was sufficient to accomodate the three staff members from the Monticello EOC.' These staff were assigned to a designated table. Municipal plans and checklist were available. All other graphics and the maintenance of the status boards were county responsibilities. The radios and telephones available in the county EOC were accessible to the municipal staff.

19 O

- - - - wa - - - - - - ,.- ,.=

• • e - - - + - - - - - -----w-- -

3._ _

~

^ "

6;V Nr N 4

_ -j . - s y . .

4 Racall of released staff would be carried out by the Sheriff's. officer who was on assignment to the municipality and relocated with the management staff. S e primary contact with municipal staff on stand by would be made using the telephone and peger with backup by Sheriff's department radio and i,3 squad car. .

Publip alerting and instructions ~are not carried out by nunicipal staff.

Althodgh sirens are located within nunicipal boundaries, they are activated n by County Sheriff's Dispatchers. If supplemental notification is reguired,.

[

route alerting would be performed by County Sheriff's staff. 1

' Se Mimicipal Police established six traffic control points and maintained ,.

these locations until the evacuation was couplete. Access control of the '

evacuated area was managed by the County in combination with the State Police. During the evacuation, the nunicipality had the equipment and ,

_ personnel available to nanage inpediments to evacuation within the community's boundary.

De Monticello BOC maintains a written list of the mobility inpaired with .

f their special needs. Provisions for moving these individuals'on a specially-r

'e equipped bus were sinulated. A notice was provided to all nunicipal schools 1 informing them of the evacuation recormendation. Busses were notified and

an'IBS message was prepared by the County on the location to which the

[ school children were to be moved. mis demonstration was sinulated.

l Upon arrival at the Wright County EOC, each staff member from the Monticello j EOC was scanned for radiological contamination'and provided with exposure

control equipment. They were scanned inside the EOC in the access control area. If individuals had been contaminated, the EOC entrance and exit would ' ,

t i have been contaminated. However, this situation resulted from the scenario l not including a demonstration of decontamination procedures. During an 1

actual emergency the relocating personnel would first report to the County i

decontamination center before continuing on to the Wright County EOC.- {

Radiological Exposure Control ,

-1

.Although not an exercise objective, the County did issue dosimeters to the EOC staff upon their arrival at the EOC.

a Media Relations 3

2 Public. information activities were to be demonstrated at the JPIC and are

. discussed in the Media Relations section under the State of Minnesota.

Recovery and Reentry i

h e State forwarded to the County information to be provided to the residents returning to their homes. Bis information was announced to the EOC staff. S e County did not discuss the problems which could be encountered during recovery and reentry. Monticello City staff terminated their participation in the exercise prior to the recovery and ceentry phase.

AREA REQUIRING CORRICTIVE ACTION: M.' l . Wright County EOC staff should more e l

f fully discuss and evaluate recovery and reentry matters during the next '

l biennial exercise.

~

29

.. .. _._-_.__,__ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ ._ _ , _J

E .

4 1

I

&  % d 9

e j . .,

O W

e i

SMARY LISTING OF EXERCISE FINDI?CS 9

e 21 e

=

,. L , .. .

tRILITY: Monticelin Nuclear Generating Station ' '

l '.'

Stsnery Listing of, Exercise Findings

- 1. Deficiencies October 9,-1985 Minnesota (Date)

(State)

Minnesota (Connunity)

Corrective Action Scheduled Actual ICREG Narrative Statement Date Date of Weakness Proposed Item NONE

?

e t

0 9* q ,

22

IfrILITY: Monticello Nuclear Generating Station -

Suninary Listing of Ext >rcise Findings Areas Requiring Corrective Action 2.

October 9, 1995 Minnesota (State) (Dato)

Minnesota (Comnunity)

NUREG Narrative Statement Corrective Action Scheduled Actual Item of Weakness Proposed Date Date A.4. A shift change of the staff at the JPIC must lx3 demonstrated at the ~

next biennial exercise. .

E.7. Hard copy of EBS messages, other State releases and briefing statements should be made available to the media at the JPIC.

G.4.c. Systems to monitor broadcast-information and correct

, misinformation should be demonstrated during the'next exercise. 'Ihe State rumor control system must be .

demonstrated during.the next . , , -

exercise.

23 9

m .w.. g

l -

UTILITY: Monticello Nuclear Generating Station -

' ' ' 6' Stmmry Listing of Exercise Findings

3. Areas Reconnended For Inprovement.

October 9, 1985 Minnesota (Date)

(State)

Minnesota

. (Conmunity)

1. 'Ihe prescripted messages used in the EBS message should he specific as to the geographic boundaries for the areas to be evacuated or sheltered. Ak11tionally, they should include instructions to the transient population and information concerning closing of windows, shutting off ventilation systcms and other pre-departure actions.

2. Representatives from local units of government could be utilized as spokespersons in the JPIC.

. 3. Kits containing background inform 1 tion on nuclear power, radiation, etc., should be available at the JPIC.  ;

9 4

0

- t 0 ,

s

- 2'4 m u=m g

(TTILITY: Monticello Nuclear Generating Station , , ,,,*

Stamary Listing of Exercise Findings

1. Deficiencies October 9, 1985 Minnesota gDete)

(State)

Sherburne County (Conmunity) .

NUREG- Narrative Statement Corrective Action Scheduled Actual of Weakness Proposed Date Date Item NONE 8 0

$ l 25

s .

(frILITY: Monticello Nuclear Generating Station , , ,,',

Stmunary Listing of Exercise Findings .

2. Areas Requiring Corrective Action Minnesota October 9, 1985 (State) (Date)

Sherburne County .

(Cannunity)

NUREG Narrative Statement Corrective Action Scheduled Actual item of Weakness Proposed Date Date G.4.a. Sherburne County nust be represented at the JPIC and participate in the coordination of information which is released to the media.

J.10.g. 'Ihe situation presented no opportunity for the County to demonstrate evacuation of a 2 001.

The objective remains to be demonstrated in the next exercise.

• ' W g 4

26

.. 1 s.

UTILITY: 'Monticello Nuclear Generating Station , , . ,.,

Stenary Listing of Exorcise Findings

3. Areas Reconnrwkxl For Improvement Minnesota October 9, 1985.

(State) (Date)

Sherburne County (Consnunity) .

1. Representatives from local units of government could be utilized as spokespersons in the JPIC.

8 F g 27 e

< e a

UTILITY: Monticello Nuclear Cenerating Statio_n , , ,*.,

Sunmary Listing of Exercise Findings Deficiencies 1.

Minnesota October 9, 1985 (State) (Date)

Wright County ~

(Comnunity) .

NUREG Narrative Statement . Corrective Action Scheduled Actual Item of Weakness Proposed Date Date NONE a

s

• 4

• F g

)

28 1

i.

1 trrILITY: Monticello Nuclear Cenerating Station , _, ,.'.

Stenary Listing of Exercise Findings

2. Areas Requiring Corrective Action Minnesota . October 9, 1985-(State) (Date)

Wright County (Comnunity) .

NUREG Narrative ~ Statement Corrective Action Scheduled Actual Item of Weakness Proposed Date Date F.1.a. 'Ihe Wright County Dispatch office had to call back to obtain inportant inform tion. Procedures to receive '

initial information concerning plant conditions must be reviewed and steps taken to eliminate the possibility of missing vital inform tion concerning emergency conditions at the plant arvi actions required by the Cototy.

M.I. Wright County EOC staff should more fully discuss and evhluate recovery and reentry matters during'the next biennial exercise.

8 F g 29 O

+. ., ,

j .

(frILITY: Monticello Nuclear Generating Station

• Stenary Listing of Exercise Fitxlings ' '- ' '?

3. Areas Reconnended For Inproet

• Minnesota' .

October 9, 1985 (State) (Date)

Wright County -

(Ccenunity)

1. Sone procedures for noise control within the operations room would be helpful.

2. Representatives from local units of government could be utilized as spokespersons in the JPIC.

J e

e 4

8 p 4

30 O

$