ML20236T381: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:51084
| stage = Approval
}}
}}


Line 36: Line 38:
==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
REVIEW 0F DAVIS-BESSE COMFORMANCE TO REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97, REVISION 3 (TAC 51084)
REVIEW 0F DAVIS-BESSE COMFORMANCE TO REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97, REVISION 3 (TAC 51084)
By letter dated June 28, 1984 (No 1059), Toledo Edison Company provided the              l information requested in Generic Letter 82-33 (December 17,1982). The staff              i review of those submittals was provided with our letter dated October 16, 1985.
By {{letter dated|date=June 28, 1984|text=letter dated June 28, 1984}} (No 1059), Toledo Edison Company provided the              l information requested in Generic Letter 82-33 (December 17,1982). The staff              i review of those submittals was provided with our {{letter dated|date=October 16, 1985|text=letter dated October 16, 1985}}.
Toledo Edison      ;
Toledo Edison      ;
That Company  review  indicated to the guidancethat certainin of contained      the exceptions Regulatory            taken by(Rev. 3) were Guide 1.97, unacceptable. Your letters of January 27, 1986 (No. 1232), and September 26, 1986 (No. 1266), supplied information to resolve the issue.
That Company  review  indicated to the guidancethat certainin of contained      the exceptions Regulatory            taken by(Rev. 3) were Guide 1.97, unacceptable. Your letters of January 27, 1986 (No. 1232), and September 26, 1986 (No. 1266), supplied information to resolve the issue.

Latest revision as of 22:37, 19 March 2021

Forwards SER Re Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97,Rev 3. Post-accident Monitoring Instrumentation Design Acceptable
ML20236T381
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 11/25/1987
From: De Agazio A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Shelton D
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20236T382 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-01.097, RTR-REGGD-1.097 GL-82-33, TAC-51084, NUDOCS 8712010196
Download: ML20236T381 (2)


Text

y

  • - , 1 t

@ RtCy 7'  !['

  1. jo,,

o e ,$

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

']

)

k.***++ ,/ November 25, 1987 i

J Docket No. 50-346 Serial No. DB-87-016 Mr. Donald C. Shelton Vice President, Nuclear l

-Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza - Stop 712 300 Madison Avenue ,

Toledo, Ohio 43652 )

Dear Mr. Shelton:

SUBJECT:

REVIEW 0F DAVIS-BESSE COMFORMANCE TO REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97, REVISION 3 (TAC 51084)

By letter dated June 28, 1984 (No 1059), Toledo Edison Company provided the l information requested in Generic Letter 82-33 (December 17,1982). The staff i review of those submittals was provided with our letter dated October 16, 1985.

Toledo Edison  ;

That Company review indicated to the guidancethat certainin of contained the exceptions Regulatory taken by(Rev. 3) were Guide 1.97, unacceptable. Your letters of January 27, 1986 (No. 1232), and September 26, 1986 (No. 1266), supplied information to resolve the issue.

The supplemental information has been reviewed, and the staff concludes that the Davis-Besse post accident monitoring instrumentation design is acceptable i with regard to Regulatory Guide 1.97. This conclusion is contingent upon your confirmation that containment air is continuously monitored by the Class IE containment high range radiation monitor measuring both iodine and particulate activity. Please provide this confirmation not later than December 31, 1987.

It is my understanding that implementation of all actions necessary for post accident monitoring instrumentation conformance, as referenced in the attached Safety Evaluation, is not yet complete, based on infomation presented in your submittals referenced above and a telephone discussion on November 18, 1986. Further, I understand that the outstanding modifications necessary for full implementation are:

(1) Install MSly and AVV position indication (2) Extend the range of RCS pressure indication (3) Modify neutron flux system (4) Provide the control room with SFRCS startup level indication l

l 8712010196 871125 PDR ADOCK 05000346 P PDR8

1 .!

l Q.

Mr. Donald C. Shelton Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Toledo Edison Company Unit No. I cc:

Donald H..Hauser, Esq.  !

The Cleveland Electric Radiological Health Program  :

Illuminating Company Ohio Department of Health P. O. Box 5000 1224 Kinnear Road Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Columbus, Ohio 43212 g Mr. Robert W. Schrauder. Attorney General l Manager, Nuclear Licensing Department of Attorney

! Toledo Edison Company General l Edison Plaza- 30 East Broad Street 300 Madison Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43215 Toledo, Ohio 43652 Mr. James W. Harris, Director I Gerald Charnoff, Esq. (AddresseeOnly)

Shaw, Pittman, Potts Division of Power Generation {

and Trowbridge -Ohio Department of Industrial Relations )

2300 N Street N.W. 2323 West 5th Avenue i Washington, D.C. 20037 P. O. Box 825 i Columbus, Ohio 43216 '

Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 799 Roosevelt Road 361 East Broad Street. 1 Glen Ellyn, Illinois Columbus, Ohio 43266-0558 i President, Board of Mr. Robert B. Borsum County Commissioners of Babcock & Wilcox Ottawa County Nuclear Power Generation Division Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 .

Suite 200, 7910 Woodmont Avenue )

Bethesda, Maryland 20814 State of Ohio l Public Utilities Commission Resident Inspector 180 East Broad Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Columbus, Ohio 43266-0573 1 5503 N. State Route 2 Oak Harbor, Ohio 43449 l

Y s.

L______-_____-________-