ML20059A682

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-346/90-09 on 900417-0717. Violations Noted But Not Cited.Util Will Be Notified by Separate Correspondence of NRC Decision Re Enforcement Action Based on Findings of Insp
ML20059A682
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/13/1990
From: Greenman E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Shelton D
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20059A687 List:
References
NUDOCS 9008230169
Download: ML20059A682 (3)


See also: IR 05000346/1990009

Text

DLQ f DLG4 RTOS) '

^~

'

~ *

'

e. t.

'

.. h

~

4

," ,.

.

,

,

-

f

.t

,

n

,

,

,

.J

'

!

4

,

'

AUG 13199Q

.

"

,

a

,

7,

,

  • . Docket No.'50-346'

,

o

<

- ..

~

Toledo-Edison Company

e'

ATTN: 'Mri: Donald Shelton'

, '

j e " Vice President-

.

,

'

.'

,

Nuclear,

.'

"

" '

-

Edis.on Plaza

'

' "

'

.

'

' -300 Madison Avenue

'

'

nToledo, OH -43652

l

^

':

-

)

.

s

-i

.

s.

i

.

Gentlemen:'

'

3

.

p

This 'r'efers to'the s aecial ' safety inspection conducted by Messrs.;P; ~M. Byron, ' s

.<

r

R. K.L Walton, P. L. iiland, and D.; C. Kosloff of this office on April'17-

1

.,

,

through July 17, 1990, of activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,.,

,

'

>

,

authorized by Facility Operating License No. NPF-3 and to the discussion

4

of.our findings with Mr. L. Storz at the conclusion of the inspection.

"

,

,.

-

Theencibsedcopyofourinspectionreportidentifiesareasexamined/duhing

.

,

,

the' inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

.

,,

examination of-procedures and representative records,' observations,'and

' -

y

P

interviews with personnel.

-

,

<

,,

,

,

- C

- During this inspection, certain of y'our activities appeared to be in violationg

.

of NRC requirements.

You will be notified by separate correspondence'of our

' decision regarding enforcement action based on the findings of this inspection.

i

,

No; written response is required until you are notified of the proposed. enforcement

j

,

~

,

action.;

'

,.

,

4/

In addition, certain other activities appeared to be.in, violation

l

'

of NRC' requirements.

These apparent violations pertain to the failure to c

.,

.

'

Q

>

1.

' adequately perform the source check required by Technical Specification 3.'3:3.10~and

failure to properly implement Housekeeping Control in establishing cleanliness

,

,controis and-are fully described in Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the enclosed

s

inspection report.

These violations have been categorized at a Severity Level.

,

IV/V and a Notice of Violation (Notice) is normally-issued for violations at-

',

,

ithat Severity Level.

However, the NRC wants to' encourage and-support

licensee's initiatives for the self-identification and reporting of ' potential

<-

,

,

"

&

violations and for implementing immediate, effective'and lasting corrective

-

.

.

action, including thorough root ~cause analysis.

Further,'these violations do.

not appear to be either repetitive or willful in nature. .Therefore,-in?

1

. accordance with paragraph V.G.1 of the " General Statement of Policy and

'

' nProcedure for NRC Enforcement Actions." (Enforcement Policy) 10 CFR Part 2,

'

>

'

,

Appendix C., the NRC is exercising the discretion authorized by the'

l

Enforcement _ Policy and a Notice of Violation is not:being issued for these

',*

,

imatters.

You are requested to notify us in writing within~ 30 days of the dater

'

~

+

  • a

>

'

.

.x

,

,

,

9008230169 900810

0 0 0'l *~

^

'

L*

ei

PDR

ADOCK 05000346

ly$4i

1

y

e

Q

PDC

N

'

fll'

,

t

,,

,

sJ

u

M'

lb E!

,

,

_ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,

  • '

'

F.

!

.

,

<

r

..

.

.-

1 3 l990

Toledo Edison Company

2

_

l

L

,

of this letter only if you disagree with our statements of-your corrective

t

actions for the violations described.in Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the enclosed

inspection report.

Otherwise, a reply to these' issues is not required and we-

doinot have any,further questions at-this time.

The cort-ective actions which

i

you implemented as a result of this violation will be examined during fut.ure

'

NRC inspections,

i

.+

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy

of this letter and the' enclosed inspection report will be placed in the

'

,NRC Public Document Room.

,

'

s

,+

,

.,

y

,

We will gladly discuss any, questions you have concerning this inspection._

'

,

Sincerely,

'

,

'

d,

.

,

Oricinni cic.wd by L'. L.Jctnoy.,

-

,

'

,'

Edward G. Greenman, Director.

f

Division of Reactor Projects

L~

.

Inspection Report

_,

.

Enclosure:

I

'

'

-

,No. 50-346/90009(DRP)

'_b

<

.

,

.

.

,

'cc w/ enclosure:

,I

'

-

.

,

,

.L.. Storz, Plant Manager

..'

.DCD/DCB (RIDS)

'

"

4

i Licensing Fee Management Branch

0

e

'

Resident Inspector, RIII

i,

i

James W.' Harris,: State of Ohio

Io

Robert E. Owen, Ohio

'

Department of Health

l

A. Grandjean, State of Ohio,

-

Public Utilities Commission

>

l

.

,

,

.

4

l

,

RIII

RIII

RIII

RIII

R

RIII

y

-

,

%j

4'Greenman

Dunlop/pb

Jackiw._

Greger

Knop

'.

(lhjo -

-

,

+

f 1. 4 . ,

_.U

4

-

=v

.-

q

A

.

.

,

,

.

.

,

.

Toledo Edison Company

2

'AUS1Ii990

' .

-

,

. .

.

of this letter only if you disagree with our statements of your corrective

actions for the violations described in Paragraphs 3 and 7 of:the enclosed

inspection report.

Otherwise, a reply to these issues is not-required 'and we

'

.

do not have any further questions at this. time.

The corrective actions which

~

you implemented as a result of this violation will be examined during future

NRC inspections,

t

-

,

'

In accordance with 10.CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a ' copy

of this-letter and the enclosed' inspection report will;be placed in ti.e-

,

-NRC Public Document Room.

We will. gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection. . _

Sincerely,

'

8

,

OricinalsignedbyC.L'[rornoy,

'

Edward G. Greenman, Director

Division of Reactor Project.

,

'

'

, , '

Enclosure: . Inspection Report

.

No..50-346/90009(DRP)

'

<

1o

g

,

cc"w/ehclosure:'

.

t

L; Storz,1 Plant Manager

"O

' t

'

,

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

.-

,

-

j.

l/

Licensing Fee Management Branch

%

.

',

'

<

Rbsi' dent Inspector; RIII

v

,

.

Y

'

,I_

'Jamss W. Harris,. State.of Ohio

.

k

'

.

'

p\\ L

'

'6

F '""

Robert?E,;Owen, Ohio.

'

,

Department of Health

'

'

'

"

'

,

,

,f

A'. GEandjean, State of Ohio,

'e

i

-

>

'

i')

'

.

-

,

!

L

.

Public Utilities < Commission

,'

t

.y,

q

i

,

u,

,

m ; .m

4 v

,

l

)

I.

.-

il3

.

,y

! { q!

+

.s

$

%

.*

4

m

..

. ,h

' ' s'

._

y (s

,'jf

sq.

,

l

$

>),

<

.

,

,

'

?

g

(

,

.

t

-

', 't .

&

_

';N

'% -

?

_,

i i

5

'

'

,

,

_

'

'

1'

,

'.

.t

(

r

.-

4

4

e

i

b

'

.

Duni p/pb.

cb

~

er.p.

' Grobe'

'Greeninan

>

,

, . , , - , ,

v

,

_ - ,

e

.