ML20059A682

Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-346/90-09 on 900417-0717. Violations Noted But Not Cited.Util Will Be Notified by Separate Correspondence of NRC Decision Re Enforcement Action Based on Findings of Insp

ML20059A682
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/13/1990
From:	Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Shelton D TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20059A687	List: ML20059A682 ML20059A689
References
NUDOCS 9008230169
Download: ML20059A682 (3)

See also: IR 05000346/1990009

Text

^~ ~ *

DLQ f DLG4 RTOS) '

'

'

e. t. .. h

'

~

4 ," ,.

.

,

, -

f

.t ,

, ,

n ,

'

4

.J ,  !

'

.

AUG 13199Q

"

7, a , ,

,

,

. Docket No.'50-346'

o < - ..

~

Toledo-Edison Company  :

e' , ' ATTN: 'Mri: Donald Shelton' ,

.

.'

j e " Vice President- '

,

-

Nuclear, " " '

.'

' '

.

'

Edis.on Plaza ' " '

'

^

'

-300 Madison Avenue

)

nToledo, OH -43652 l .

- ':

s . . s. i

-i

Gentlemen:' '

3 . p

.< r This 'r'efers to'the s aecial ' safety inspection conducted by Messrs.;P; ~M. Byron, ' s

,

R. K.L Walton, P. L. iiland, and D.; C. Kosloff of this office on April'17- 1

,

.,

>

through July 17, 1990, of activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,., ,

'

authorized by Facility Operating License No. NPF-3 and to the discussion 4

,.

of.our findings with Mr. L. Storz at the conclusion of the inspection. ,

• "

,

- .

,

Theencibsedcopyofourinspectionreportidentifiesareasexamined/duhing

,,

the' inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective .

examination of-procedures and representative records,' observations,'and '- y P

interviews with personnel.  ; * <

,, ,

,

,

-

-C - During this inspection, certain of y'our activities appeared to be in violationg .

of NRC requirements. You will be notified by separate correspondence'of our *

,

' decision regarding enforcement action based on the findings of this inspection. i

,

~

No; written response is required until you are notified of the proposed. enforcement ,

j

,. action.; ,

'

4

/

Q >

In addition, certain other activities appeared to be.in, violation

of NRC' requirements.

'

These apparent violations pertain to the failure to c

l

., .

' adequately perform the source check required by Technical Specification 3.'3:3.10~and

'

1.

failure to properly implement Housekeeping Control in establishing cleanliness ,

s

,controis and-are fully described in Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the enclosed

,

inspection report. These violations have been categorized at a Severity Level. *

', , IV/V and a Notice of Violation (Notice) is normally-issued for violations at-

ithat Severity Level. However, the NRC wants to' encourage and-support

<-

"

, licensee's initiatives for the self-identification and reporting of ' potential ,

& violations and for implementing immediate, effective'and lasting corrective -

. .

action, including thorough root ~cause analysis. Further,'these violations do.

not appear to be either repetitive or willful in nature. .Therefore,-in? 1

' '

. accordance with paragraph V.G.1 of the " General Statement of Policy and  ;

'

nProcedure for NRC Enforcement Actions." (Enforcement Policy) 10 CFR Part 2, >

'

, Appendix C., the NRC is exercising the discretion authorized by the' l

',* ,

Enforcement _ Policy and a Notice of Violation is not:being issued for these

+ imatters.

'

You are requested to notify us in writing within~ 30 days of the dater ~

a >

'

.

.x ,

, ,

9008230169 900810 0 0 0'l *~ ^ '

L*

y

1

ei

e'

PDR

Q

ADOCK 05000346

PDC

ly$4i ,

N ,,

,

fll' t

M'

u

lb E! * '

sJ

'

F.

!

, . <

r .. .

.-

Toledo Edison Company 2

1 3 l990

L ,

_ l

of this letter only if you disagree with our statements of-your corrective

t actions for the violations described.in Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the enclosed

inspection report. Otherwise, a reply to these' issues is not required and we-

doinot have any,further questions at-this time. The cort-ective actions which

i' you implemented as a result of this violation will be examined during fut.ure *

NRC inspections, i

.+ In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy  ;

'

of this letter and the' enclosed inspection report will be placed in the

, ,NRC Public Document Room.

'

s ,+ ,

.,

,

y

We will gladly discuss any, questions you have concerning this inspection._ '

,

Sincerely, ,

'

'

.

d,

,

Oricinni cic.wd by L'. L.Jctnoy., ,

-

'

,' Edward G. Greenman, Director.

f Division of Reactor Projects

L~ .

'

.

'

Enclosure: Inspection Report _,

- I

< . ,No. 50-346/90009(DRP) '_b

. .

,

,

. 'cc w/ enclosure: , ,I ,

-

'

.L.. Storz, Plant Manager ..'

'

"

.DCD/DCB (RIDS) 4

0 i Licensing Fee Management Branch ' e  ;

Resident Inspector, RIII i, i

James W.' Harris,: State of Ohio Io

Robert E. Owen, Ohio '

Department of Health

l A. Grandjean, State of Ohio,

-

Public Utilities Commission >

l .

,

,

.

4

l ,

y RIII RIII RIII ;RIII R RIII -

,

Dunlop/pb Jackiw._ Greger Knop '.

%j 4'Greenman

(lhjo -

,

-

+

f 1. 4 .

-

=v

.- , _.U 4

q A

. .

,

,

.

.

,

.

Toledo Edison Company 2 'AUS1Ii990 l

'. -

,

. . .

of this letter only if you disagree with our statements of your corrective

actions for the violations described in Paragraphs 3 and 7 of:the enclosed

inspection report. Otherwise, a reply to these issues is not-required 'and we

'

.

do not have any further questions at this. time. The corrective actions which

~

you implemented as a result of this violation will be examined during future  ;

NRC inspections, t

,

-

'

In accordance with 10.CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a ' copy

of this-letter and the enclosed' inspection report will;be placed in ti.e- ,

-NRC Public Document Room.

We will. gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection. . _

'

Sincerely,

8

,

OricinalsignedbyC.L'[rornoy, '

Edward G. Greenman, Director

Division of Reactor Project. ,

'

'

,,' Enclosure: . Inspection Report '

.

o

1 No..50-346/90009(DRP) <

, g

cc"w/ehclosure:' .

t

'

,

L; Storz,1 Plant Manager "O ,

' t

DCD/DCB (RIDS) .- * -

j.

l/ Licensing Fee Management Branch

'

% .

<

',

Rbsi' dent Inspector; RIII v ,

' .

Y

' '

.

'Jamss W. Harris,. State.of Ohio

p\'6L

,I_ .

'

k

Robert?E,;Owen, Ohio. ,

'

F '""

Department of Health '

'

' " '

'e

,

i

,

'

,f

'

A'. GEandjean, State of Ohio, . -

-

>

i')

L

u,

! . Public Utilities < Commission ,' t .y,

,

q i ,

)

, 4 v m ; .m ,

I.

.-

l * + . ,y .s *

! {..q!

il3 $  % * .* 4 m

' ' s' .* ,h sq.

,'jf

._ ,

$ >), <

.

y (s

l ,

,  :

, .

&

t -

g

';N

'

('% -  ?

_

?

ii

'

'

,

', 't . _,

,

5

_

' '

1'

,

.t

(

r '. .- 4

4 e

i

b

'

.

cb

~

Duni p/pb. er.p. ' Grobe' 'Greeninan >

,

,.,,-,,  ;

v ,

_ - ,

e .