ML20246L657

Responds to Re Annual Requalification Exam Grading Results.Based on Reviews & Consultations W/Nrc, Remedial Training,Consistent W/Identified Weaknesses, Provided & Intent of Requalification Program Met

ML20246L657
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/30/1989
From:	Miller H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Shelton D TOLEDO EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8909070018
Download: ML20246L657 (2)

Text

_

..g , . i ), i Docket No. 50-346

'M Toledo Edison. Company AVTN: Mr. Donald Shelton Vice President Nuclear Edison ~ Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652

Dear Mr. Shelton:

This is in response to your August 11,-1989 letter regarding the annual requalification examination regrading results.

As stated, in your letter,'one member of your licensed staff had scored below 80% on his annual exam after applying the grading method recommended by my staff. It is noted that NUREG 1021, Rev. 5, ES 601 does not specify a specific grading technique. Also, you confirmed that this individual has not performed licensed duties since he took the annual examination and would not be assigned any licensed duties pending our approval.

A review'of the regraded examination and subsequent quizzes administered to the individual was conducted by a member of my operator licensing staff.

Our review of the original examination indicated that it contained a well-designed set of static scenarios on which the part A test questions were based. Most of the examination questions were objective and well presented;-

however, some double jeopardy questions and at least one case of severe grading were identified that led to the lower grade.

Our review of the cycle training quizzes administered to the individual subsequent to the annual exam leads us to conclude that he has recently demonstrated adequate knowledge in the general areas of weakness revealed by the annual exam.

Based on the above reviews and consultation with NRR we have concluded that remedial training consistent with the identified weaknesses has been provided and that you have met the intent of your program.

l 8909070018 890830 DR ADOCK0500ggg6 l

L___

/-o/

!o;  ;

4 ; ., c. ,

s

~

Toledo Edison Company- 2 z, 3 .' 13 5 The individual may be returned.to licensed activities at-your' discretion

- provided all. requirements for reactivating his license are met.

T. O. Martin for Hubert J. Miller, Director Division of Reactor Safety cc: . L.- Storz, Plant Manager -

.DCD/DCB (RIDS).

. Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII James W. Harris, State of Ohio Roger Suppes.: Ohio ..

Department of. Health A. Grandjean, State of. Ohio, Public Utilitias Commission. 4 R. DeFayette, DRP: 4 LSRI, Davis-Besse

.RIII III RIII Bu ick/cg fir t blr Av x_______-__