ML20206B277: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:64532
| stage = Approval
}}
}}


Line 23: Line 25:
==Dear Mr. Cockfield:==
==Dear Mr. Cockfield:==


By letter dated January 27, 1987, Portland General Electric Company (PGE) subriitted an evaluation of Trojan Cycle 9 Core Physics Data.
By {{letter dated|date=January 27, 1987|text=letter dated January 27, 1987}}, Portland General Electric Company (PGE) subriitted an evaluation of Trojan Cycle 9 Core Physics Data.
Because of differences between design predictions and test data for shutdown margin, consideration had been given to performing middle-of-life core physics measurements to verify shutdown margin for end of cycle. PGE concluded that additional measurements were not necessary.
Because of differences between design predictions and test data for shutdown margin, consideration had been given to performing middle-of-life core physics measurements to verify shutdown margin for end of cycle. PGE concluded that additional measurements were not necessary.
We have reviewed the January 27, 1987 submittal as well as additional information supplied by PGE and find that the information supports this conclusion. Our Safety Evaluation is enclosed.
We have reviewed the January 27, 1987 submittal as well as additional information supplied by PGE and find that the information supports this conclusion. Our Safety Evaluation is enclosed.

Latest revision as of 14:37, 6 December 2021

Forwards Safety Evaluation Supporting Cycle 9 Core Physics Data.Addl Measurements of middle-of-life Core Physics Verifying Shutdown Margin for End of Cycle Not Necessary
ML20206B277
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/1987
From: Chan T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Cockfield D
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20206B282 List:
References
TAC-64532, NUDOCS 8704090056
Download: ML20206B277 (2)


Text

(.

o- April 6, 1987 Docket No. 50-344 DISTRIRIJTION E E "YT1 NRC PDR Local PDR PD#3 Rdg.

Mr. David W. Cockfield T. Novak OGC Vice President, Nuclear E. Jordan B. Grimes Portland General Electric Company J. Partlow N. Thompson 121 S.W. Salmon Street T. Chan C. Vogan Portland, Oregon 97204 ACRS (10)

Dear Mr. Cockfield:

By letter dated January 27, 1987, Portland General Electric Company (PGE) subriitted an evaluation of Trojan Cycle 9 Core Physics Data.

Because of differences between design predictions and test data for shutdown margin, consideration had been given to performing middle-of-life core physics measurements to verify shutdown margin for end of cycle. PGE concluded that additional measurements were not necessary.

We have reviewed the January 27, 1987 submittal as well as additional information supplied by PGE and find that the information supports this conclusion. Our Safety Evaluation is enclosed.

Sincerely, Terence L. Chan, Project Manager Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosure:

As stated PD#3 p) PD#3 CVogan TChan:pds 4/P/87 4/6/87 I

8704090056 870406 PDR ADOCK 05000344 p PD't

f l

Mr. David W. Cockfield Portland General Electric Company Trojan Nuclear Plant l

cc:

l Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Trojan Nuclear Plant l Post Office Box 0 .

l Rainier, Oregon 97048 -

, Robert M. Hunt, Chairman l Board of County Commissioners Columbia County St. Helens, Oregon 97501 ,

William T. Dixon Oregon Department of Energy Labor and Industries Building .

Room 111 Salem, Oregon 97310 Regional Administrator, Region Y

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 k'alnut Creek, California 94596 a

0 4 en e .

e I

l l

! t O

O