ML20202J782: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:_ . .
        '?
g                                                                                        Paga 1 of 2 EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION N]
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION FOR ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLAN VII.c CHANGE NOTICE 001 COT 10 ' 9 C0 3Y' -
                                                                              . CONTROL N0,DFCDI INSTRUCTION NO: QI-052 REVISION: /1 5 Cl1l%S ISSUE DATE: 66/63/86 DOCUMENTATION REVIEW OF PIPE WHIP RESTRAINTS r
Prepared by:                                            Date:
g                                    .  ,
Approved by:            .' l .,. /,,/ / / h            Date:  4///eP4 Issue Ccp/ddnator Approved by: M                                          Date:  /-S-Sn.
On ' Site CfA Representative Approved by:                                            Date:    G 3 /4 Q      C Review Team Leader                        ,
I  '
n I    f  f--QO711
                              --000443 PDR
 
f                                                                                                                          .Changs Notica 001
  ' g?                                                                                                                          QI-052
: 1.          Page 3, Replace the whole Section 5.1.2. as follows:
$ ()                                                                    5.1.2  Drawings (IB)
                                                                                . Record on Attachment 6.8 all drawing (s) and NCR(s) listed, referenced or physically included in the traveler package (s). Do not list this information from any
  ,                                                                              historical file that may be included in the traveler package. The Discipline Engineer shall compare these against the drawing (s) and the NCR(s) used for the reinspection program and initiate Deviation Reports, if appropriate.
Note: For the Document Review Packages completed before the
                                                                                . issuance of this' change notice, the Discipline Engineer shall review (and update, if necessary) Attachment 6.8 for above requirements.
: 2.            Page 4, Section 5.2, sixth line in the text; replace "Section 8.5" by "Section 8.1 or 8.5".
: 3.            Page ll, first paragraph, replace " receipt inspection documented on the RIR" by " site inspector has indicated on the RIR that the '
receipt inspection".
1 O
i r
2
          - - . . - - . - . . . . . - . - - _ . . . . - . . . . . . . - .                      . - . - , -      . .    . . .  . . -    - - . - . - . , - . - - -}}

Latest revision as of 07:54, 1 January 2021

Change Notice 001 to Rev 1 to Quality Instruction QI-052, Documentation Review of Pipe Whip Restraints
ML20202J782
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/1986
From: Hansel J, Patterson A
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J051 List: ... further results
References
QI-052, QI-52, NUDOCS 8607170146
Download: ML20202J782 (2)


Text

_ . .

'?

g Paga 1 of 2 EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION N]

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION FOR ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLAN VII.c CHANGE NOTICE 001 COT 10 ' 9 C0 3Y' -

. CONTROL N0,DFCDI INSTRUCTION NO: QI-052 REVISION: /1 5 Cl1l%S ISSUE DATE: 66/63/86 DOCUMENTATION REVIEW OF PIPE WHIP RESTRAINTS r

Prepared by: Date:

g . ,

Approved by: .' l .,. /,,/ / / h Date: 4///eP4 Issue Ccp/ddnator Approved by: M Date: /-S-Sn.

On ' Site CfA Representative Approved by: Date: G 3 /4 Q C Review Team Leader ,

I '

n I f f--QO711

--000443 PDR

f .Changs Notica 001

' g? QI-052

1. Page 3, Replace the whole Section 5.1.2. as follows:

$ () 5.1.2 Drawings (IB)

. Record on Attachment 6.8 all drawing (s) and NCR(s) listed, referenced or physically included in the traveler package (s). Do not list this information from any

, historical file that may be included in the traveler package. The Discipline Engineer shall compare these against the drawing (s) and the NCR(s) used for the reinspection program and initiate Deviation Reports, if appropriate.

Note: For the Document Review Packages completed before the

. issuance of this' change notice, the Discipline Engineer shall review (and update, if necessary) Attachment 6.8 for above requirements.

2. Page 4, Section 5.2, sixth line in the text; replace "Section 8.5" by "Section 8.1 or 8.5".
3. Page ll, first paragraph, replace " receipt inspection documented on the RIR" by " site inspector has indicated on the RIR that the '

receipt inspection".

1 O

i r

2

- - . . - - . - . . . . . - . - - _ . . . . - . . . . . . . - . . - . - , - . . . . . . . - - - . - . - . , - . - - -