ML20202J377
| ML20202J377 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/15/1986 |
| From: | TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202J051 | List:
|
| References | |
| DAP-19, NUDOCS 8607170069 | |
| Download: ML20202J377 (31) | |
Text
.
TITLE
=
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/OC ADEOUACY PROGRAM Ato THE DESIGN ADEGUACY PROGRAM NUMBER DAP-19 Revision Prepared Da te Reviewed Date Approved Date O
l&hy /*h f 'Yf[ N l*f0f
' "99 0a ok
&4 %yBQ i l'9[
. 2
, /4 e $q %k & </<r/m O
i l --
hh0 DO K S O O
TN-85-6262il9 i l
l
N TABLE OF CONTENTS Section C ov e r S he e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Table o f Con t en t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.0 P URP OS E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
. 2.0 SCOPE..................................................... I 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 4.0 I NS T R UCT I ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 '
5.0 DO CU ME NT AT ION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 ATTACHMENTS A INFORMATION FROM DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM TO QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTORS, OA/OC ADEQUACYPROGRAM .............................. A-I B OAP/DAP INTERFACE DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM .................................... B-l C TRT/DAP CONTACT LOG SFEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 D QAP/DAP INTERFACE TRANSMITTAL LOG ................... D-l APPENDIX A lk TN-85-6262/19 ii
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE
. Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 INFORMATION BE TWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTerl, QA/QC
[m(_-} PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM l.0 PURPOSE This procedure implements DAP responsibilities for CPRT program requirements for the interfoce between the Design Adequocy Program (DAP) and the Quality of Construction (OOC), OA/QC Program (OAP).
2.0 SCOPE
, This procedure opplies to the transmittal of information produced by the Design Adequacy Program (DAP) and forwarded to the Quality of Construction (OOC),
QA/QC Program (OAP) in occordance with the Piogram Plan and to the review by the DAP of information transmitted from the QOC/QAP.
3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES O
V 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 "Information Only" l The receiving organization will provide o mechanism to ensure that oppropriate j personnel within their organization are aware of the existence of the input information and that is available for review. Appropriate mechanisms include, for example, routing copies, stondord distribution and reference files. No further oction is required. An example of this activity is the receipt by the DAP of the QA/QC ISAPs for "Information."
3.1.2 " Review and Comment" The organization with this responsibility will review input dato and will, os required, provide the forwarding organization any comments in a timely manner.
) TN-85-6262/19 Poge I of 9 1
\
COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE
, Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC q PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM The forwarding organization will consider the comments and resolve any conflict I prior to completing their investigation of subject issue. Documentation of the comments and any resolution will be placed in the working files. An example of this would be the " Review and Commen?" by the DAP of design related attributes for CPRT inspection octivities.
3.l.3 " Action By" g
, The receiving organization is charged with responding to the input by the forwarding organization. This con range from a request for information to the identification of on issue that requires a new or revised oction plan. A written response is to be provided by the receiving organization and action coordinated '
with the forwarding organization where necessary. An example of this octivity is GA/QC-RTL forwarding to the DAP-RTL information on design related issues discovered during inspections, document reviews or external source material.
3.2 Responsibilities 3.2.1 Construction Quality Interface Manager i The Construction Quality Interface Monoger is responsible for:
l o Reviewing transmittals from the QOC/QAP to ossess the scope and extent of oction required by the DAP o Forwarding transmittals to the responsible Discipline Coordinator or the DAP files os appropriate o Tracking the status of those transmittols which require oction by the DAP o Transmittal to GOC /QAP of items from DAP which require oction by QOC/OAP.
TN-85-6262/19 Poge 2 of 9 y
COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 p\
t INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC O PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM 3.2.2 DAP Discipline Coordinators and the Programmatic / Generic implico-tions Coordinator
- ore responsible for:
o Completing the required oction on documents received from the OOC /QAP o Documenting the results of action token for QOC/QAP transmittals that require oction and forwarding the docu-mentation to the Construction Quality interface Manager o Notifying the Construction Quality Interface Monoger
. when a change is mode in the assignment of the discipline responsible for resolution of a required oction o identifying items within their arcos of responsibility that require transmittal to the QOC/QAP in occordance with .
Attachment A and forwarding them to the Construction Quality Interface Monoger.
4.0 INSTRUCTIONS 4.1 Processing of Transmittals from the OOC /QAP to DAP Documents received on standard distribution from the GOC /QAP shall be screened by the Interfoce Manager for action by DAP and forwarded to the DAP files. A copy of all documents requiring DAP oction (Review and Comment, or Action, oT shown on Attachment A) shall be transmitted to the responsible DAP Discipline Coordinator using o QOC/QAP/DAP Interface Transmittal form (Attachment B) by the Construction Quality Interface Manager (" Interface Monoger") or his designee.
The assigned Discipline Coordinator shall notify the interface Monoger if responsibility for resolution is reassigned to another discipline.
- Throughout the remainder of this procedure, " Discipline Coordinator" also s includes the Programmatic / Generic implications Coordinator.
)
TN-85-6262/19 Poge 3 of 9
COMANCIE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC l PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN i ADEQUACY PROGRAM Documents .tronsmitted for review and comment shall be reviewed by the responsible Discipline Coordinator or his designee. Resolution of comments shall be pursued directly with the responsible individual in the QOC/QAP. The final l l
resolution shall be documented on a Contact Log Sheet (Attachment C) or a '
referencoble memo os appropriate and a copy forwarded to the Interface Monoger. Reviews that result in. no comments shall be noted as such on the transmittal form and a copy of the transmittal form returned to the Interface Monoger. -
Resolution of items requiring oction (other than review and comment) shall be documented as follows:
o if the item involves o discrepancy, the Discipline Coordi-notor shall process it in occordance with DAP-2 and forward a copy of the DIR to the Interface Manager o if the item involves on external issue, the Discipline Coordinator shall process it in accordance with DAP-2 i and forward o copy of the issue Record to the Interface Monoger. Alternatively, o memo documenting that the item need not be considered by DAP or that it is being '
considered by DAP shall be prepared by the Discipline
( Coordinator and forwarded to the Interface Monoger.
~
o if neither of the preceding cases apply, doeurnent the i resolution on o Contact Log form or o referencoble memo and forward a copy to the Interface Monoger.
The Interface Monoger shall transmit to the QOC/QAP o copy of the above documentation except documentation for which the DAP response is "no com-l[
ments."
l The Interface Manager shall maintain oppropriate files that identify open DAP oction items and document the resolution of closed DAP oction items.
l TN-85-6262/19 Poge 4 of 9 i
l I
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE
. Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY O OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/OC C PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM 4.2 Review of Inspection Attribute Lists The DAP is required to review the OOC Inspection Attributes List. Inspection attributes are defined by OOC /OAP for each OOC inspection population in the inspection basis document referenced in the inspection procedure (01) and in more detail in the 01 (see Appendix A). For most populations, separate attribute lists and Ols are prepared for the hardware reinspections and the document reviews. The purpose of the DAP review is to ensure that the attributes selected ,
by the OOC /OAP:
o Adequately reflect the safety-significant inspection attri-butes important to the design for the population being inspected .
o incorporate any special considerations crising from CPSES design related issues / problems. d The assigned Discipline Coordinator, or his designee, shall review the inspection Attribute Lists os described below and process the results in occordance with Section 4.1 of this procedure. Design issues / problems identified offer the initial review is completed that change the acceptance criteria or require additional inspection attributes snould be processed as a request for action by the OOC /QAP (see Section 4.4).
- Level I Review (All OOC Inspection Populations)
For each OOC inspection population, the Interface Monoger will transmit the l
l inspection basis documents for review and comment by the assigned DAP Discipline Coordinator. This review is intended to be o " reasonableness" check of the attributes for all populations. The reviewers should evoluote, based on l their experience, the consistency ond sufficiency of the defined attributes and
/ TN-85-6262/19 Page 5 of 9
COMANCFE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY s OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC D) PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM the justification provided in the inspection basis documents for any attributes excluded or alternate acceptance criteria utilized.
Level 2 Review For the selected populations listed below, the reviewer shall select three design related inspection attributes from the applicable installation specification and verify that these attributes and their occeptance criterio have been correctly .
Incorporated in the inspection procedure (Ql). The results of this evoluotion shall be documented in a referenceable memo or checklist identifying the attributes selected and the results of the review.
P DAP Discipline OOC /QAP Population Piping / Supports 1. Lorge bore pipe supports (non-rigid)
U 2. Small bore pipe supports
- 3. Large bore piping configuration
- 2. Mechonical equipment installation Civil / Structural I. Structural Steel 1
- 2. Instrumentation equipment TN-85-6262/19 Page 6 of 9
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 lNFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC
(("]) PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM 4.3 Review of Safety Sionificance Assessments Safety significance assessments are prepared by the QOC/QAP in accordance with Procedure CPP-016 and transmitted to DAP for review and comment or l[
oction as indicated in Attochment A. The nature of the review of these documents by DAP depends on which of the following categories the document falls within:
. o Safety significance assessments which conclude that a deviation is not safety-significant are reviewed by DAP on a selected basis to evaluate the consistency of DAP safety significance evaluations with QOC/QAP evoluotions and to confirm that there are no design- -
related implications. The primary source of design-related problems identified by the QOC/QAP are the d action transmittals identified in Attachment A.
O (s h j o All safety significance assessments which conclude that the deviation is safety-significant, but which are not transmitted for action as o design-related problem, are reviewed to evaluate the consistency of DAP safety significance evoluotions with GOC /QAP evoluotions and k to confirm that there are no design related implications.
o Safety-signficant design related deficiencies are trans-l mitted to DAP for action and coordination of results with GOC /QAP. d The Interface Manager shall select approximately ten percent of the QOC/QAP
! safety significance ossessments that conclude that the deviation is not safety-l[
significant. The documents ' selected shall be reviewed by the DAP Interface Manager or assigned to o Discipline Coordinator for review and comment. The results of the review shall be processed per Section 4.1 of this procedure.
TN-85-6262/19 Page 7 of 9 1 i l
COMANCif PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE
. Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM The DAP Interface Manager shall forward all deficiencies which are not !
transmitted as design related (including the associated safety significance ossessment) to the responsible Discipline Coordinators for review and comment.
The results of this review shall be processed in occordance with Section 4.1 of this procedure.
~
The DAP Interfoce Coordinator shall forward for'DAP oction all deficiencies (including the associated safety significance ossessment) which are determined -
to be design related. The responsible Discipline Coordinator shall processes these transmittals in occordance with Section 4.1 of this prxedure.
4.4 Processina of Transmittals from DAP to the QOC/QAP Proarom -
Attachment A identifies the types of information required to be transmitted from the DAP to the QOC/QAP. Items identified as "information only" shall be transmitted to the QOC/QAP Interface Coordinator via standard distribution.
Items identified as review and comment, action, or coordination of results shall be transmitted via o QOC/QAP/DAP Interface Transmittal Form (Attochment B).
.l d The DAP Program Manager shall identify those DAP documents required to be transmitted to the GOC /QAP vio controlled distribution to meet the require-ments of Attachment A. The individual designated by the DAP Manager shall ld i
transmit these documents directly to the QOC/QAP Interface Coordinator and shall maintain a file of the distribution lists for these documents.
ld 5.0 DOCUMENTATION The Discipline Coordinators shall identify the documents within their areas of responsibility that need to be transmitted to the QOC/QAP for review cnd TN-85-6262/19 Page 8 of 9
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 2 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY
/G OF CONSTRUCTION, GA/QC C PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM comment or action in accordance with Attachment A. These documents shall be forwarded to the DAP Interface Monoger for transmittal to the OOC /QAP vio a GOC /QAP/DAP Interface Transmittal Form. The top portion of the form, E including the number and transmittal comments, is to be completed by the Discipline Coordinator or his designee. These transmittals shall be numbered consecutively within each discipline and use the following code to identify the originating discipline and sequential number:
DAP - T - XX - YYY b Sequential Number b Discipline / Subject Code Code Discipline C/S Civil Structural EIC Electricof/l&C G Generic implications M. Mechanical -
P Piping / Supports S
CPSES Site (DAP Interface Coordinator)
OOC OOC /QAP Program Originated E
i Electricol*
Instrumentation
- d The Discipline Coordinator will record each transmittal in o QAP/DAP Interface Transmittal log (Attachment D.)
- NOTE: Use of 'E" and "1" codes are optional alternatives to the 'EIC" code.
ElC may be used for both Electrical and I&C. 'E" may be used when the document is relevant only to the electrical discipline. "1" may be used when the document is relevant only to Instrumentation and Control. *
\ ) TN-85-6262/19 Page 9 of 9
ATTACHMENT A PARTI ItfORMATION FROM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM
, v s) TO QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/OC ADEQUACYPROGRAM Review & Action Comment By ITEM Information by OOC /OAP OOC /QAP Action Plan X Results Reports Requests for QC Inspec- X -
tions for Hardware Requests for QA Evoluo- X tions of identified design process problems -
Construction items X
< Identified in external source review d Information on root X cause analysis (no -
quality of construction or QA/OC concerns identified)
Information on root X cause analysis (OA/QC program or quality of construction concern identified)
Information on generic X '
implications evoluotion (no quality of construc-tion or QA/QC concerns identified) l l
TN-85-6262/19 A-l Rev.2 ;
Attachment A <
i ATTACHMENT A !
PARTI
~
ltfORMATION FROM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM TO QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC ADEQUACYPROGRAM (Continued)
Review & Action Comment By ITEM information by OOC /QAP OOC /QAP Information on generic X implications evoluotion (OA/QC program or quality of construction concerns identified)
, Collective Evoluotion X Report Information on X -
Construction related issues discovered during walkdowns or document reviews Safety Significant X Construction or QA/QC Deficiencies .
TN-85-6262/19 A-2 Rev.2 Attachment A
ATTACHMENT A PART2 IWORMATION FROM QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, GA/OC ADEQUACY PROGRAM i Os TO DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Review & Action Comment By ITEM Information DAP DAP 15AP Results Report X Information on design X related issues dis-covered during inspec- .
tions and document reviews or review of external sources Selection of design- X ,
i related attributes for CPRT inspection activities g
information on root X cause analysis (no design concerns)
Information on root X cause analysis (design related concerns identified)
{
Information on generic X Implications evaluation (no design related concerns)
Information on generic X implications evaluation (design related concerns
. Identified)
TN-85-6262/19 A-3 Rev.2 Attochment A
. ATTACHMENT A PART2 IWORMATION FROM OUALITY OF p) CONSTRUCTION, GA/OC ADEQUACY PROGRAM TO DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM l (Continued) l l
Review & Action Comment By ITEM Information DAP DAP i
Reinspection / Document l Review Program Information l Without Applicability to Design Somple Selection X Population Descriptions X Population Checklists X Safety Significant X Construction or QA/OC Deficiencies A Results X '
4n Collective Evoluotion X Report Periodic Trend Reports X Safety Significance X Evoluotions -
I Design Deviations X Noted by QOC/QA Safety-Significant X Design-Related Deficiencies l
TN-85-6262/19 A-4 l Rev. 2 l l Attachment A 1
2
ATTACHMENT B GOC /QAP/DAP INTERFACE DOCUMENT TRAP 6MITTAL FORM TRANSMITTAL NO. DAP-T. -
TO: Dennis Alexander FROM: John Honekomp QA/OC Interface Coordinator DAP Interfoce Coordinator DATE:
The ottoched document is transmitted for: ACTION REVIEW AND COMMENT Document Title / Revision /Date Transmittal Comments: (in ludi due date):
O Follow-up Assignment: (By ERC)
Assigned to: By:
Date Follow-up Comments:
O TN-85-6262/19 Attochment B B.! Rev. 2
3 O ATTACHMENT C U
FILE NO.
COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM DIST.
TRT/DAP CONTACT LOG SEET -
SUMMARY
OF TELECON OR MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
ORGANIZATION (S):
PARTICIPANTS: DAP: _
OTERS:
t
SUMMARY
O l
ACTION:
O TN-85-6262/19 DAP-19, Rev. 2 C-l 1
ATTACHMENT D O
V COMANCFE PEAK DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM LOG QAP/DAP INTERFACE TRANSMITTAL LOG Transmittal Requested No. Transmittal Response Document DAP-T-XX-YYY Date Date Description
+
A O
l l
I l
O TN-85-6262/19 DAP-19, Rev. 2 D-l
Page 1 of 4 d
APPEFOlX A BACKGROUND This appendix is o non-mondatory ottochment to DAP-19. The purpose of this appendix is to provide general background information and references related to the Quality of Construction Program (GOC) that may be useful to DAP personnel involved in the implementation of DAP-19. .
PROGRAM STRUCTURE The Quality of Construction (GOC) and QA/QC Program (QAP) is described in ,
Appendix B of the CPRT Program Plan and the following issue-Specific Action Plans (ISAPs):
f
\ 1.d.1 QC Inspector Qualifications 1.d.2 Guidelines for Administration of QC Inspector Tests Vll.a.1 Material Traceability ,
Vll.a.2 Non-conformance and Corrective Action Systems Vll.a.3 Document Control Vll.a.4 Audit Program and Auditor Qualification Vll.a.5 Monogement Assessment Vll.a.6 Exit interviews Vll.a.7 Housekeeping and System Cleanliness Vll.a.8 Fuel Pool Liner Vll.b. I Onsite Fabrication Vll.b.2 Valve Disassembly Vll.b.3 Pipe Support inspections Vll.b.4 Hilti Anchor Bolt installation TN-85-6262/19 APPENDIX A
\
Page 2 of 4 O,
APPENDIX A (Cont'd)
Vll.b.5 Electrical Cable Troy Roceway Support inspections Vll.c Construction Reinspectic . b umentation Review Plan ISAP Vll.c is the segment of the program under which the bulk of the hardware reinspections are perforraed, although ISAPs Vll.b.I through Vll.b.5 also include -
some hardware reinspection. The reinspections under ISAP Vll.c are structured by populations of hardware which involve similar work processes. A list of the Vll.c hardware populations (Exhibit 1) is issued periodically by the GOC /QAP.
. b PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION The general types of documentation issued by the GOC /QAP are listed below.
[
l O- The DAP maintains duplicate ERC interface files in the Berkeley, Bethesda and Site offices which contain the bulk of these documents (see ERC Interface File Index for contents). ,
Program
Description:
(Appendix B - CPRT Program Plan)
- ISAPs: (Appendix C - CPRT Program Plan)
- ERC Manual: Monogement Program Plan for the QA/QC Review Team and Quality Assurance Procedures ERC Manual: Comanche Peak Project Procedures (CPPs)
- ERC Monuots: Quality Instructions (Qls which contain the detailed inspection instructions)
TN-85-6262/19 APPENDIX A
Page 3 of 4 g)
(J PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION (Cont'd)
- Population Descriptive Information:
o Work Process Definition (Exhibit 2) o Population Description (Exhibit 3) o Population items List (Exhibit 4)
- Inspection Attribute List (Exhibit 5)
(Note that this attribute list is attached to the description memoron-dum referenced in each Ol and is located in the DAP/ERC interface file under "Inspe: tion Checklist".)
- ERC Deviation Report (Exhibit 6)
. As
- ERC Safety Significance Evoluotion (Exhibit 7)
The QOC/QAP documents of most interest to the DAP are the population descriptive information, the inspection Attribute Lists, the Gis which describe the detailed inspection methods and inspection criteria and the safety signifi-conce evoluotions for deviations found. All of these documents are contained in the DAP/QOC/QAP interface files. The preparation of these documents is
! controlled by the following ERC procedures which are also part of the DAP/ OOC /QAP interface file.
CPP-001 Preparation of Project Procedures and Quality Instructions CPP-005 Establishing Populations CPP-006 Sompte Selection O TN-85-6262/19 APPENDIX A
PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION (Cont'd)
CPP-007 Preparation of Checklists and Data Base Reports CPP-010 Preparation of Deviation Reports CPP-016 Safety Significance Evoluotions of Deviation Reports PROGRAM ORGANIZATION j A copy of the ERC organization chart is included in the DAP/ OOC /QAP Interface file. The principal organizational units of interest to DAP are: '
Construction Sample Reinspection Enoineerino A
This group, which prepares the population descriptive information, the s attribute lists and the Ols, is composed of three discipline oreos which cor-respond to the structure of the master population list (Exhibit 1).
Safety Significance Evaluation Group This group performs the safety significance evaluations of all deviations identified during the QAP reinspections. It is composed of the following four discipliines:
Electrical
- Mechanical
- Structural Supports inspection Group This group contains the inspectors who perform the QAP reinspections.
TN-85-6262/19 i -
APPENDIX A i
EXHBITS The following exhibits are examples of the first page of the types of documents listed below. They are provided to aid in the recognition of these types of documents.
Exhibit I -
Hardware Population List Exhibit 2 -
Work Process Definition Exhibit 3 - Population Description Exhibit 4 - Population items List Exhibit 5 - Inspection Attribute List Exhibit 6 -
ERC Deviation Report Exhibit 7 -
ERC Safety Significance Evaluation s
I O TN-85-6262/19 DAP-19, Rev. 2
EXHBIT I COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW TEAM MASTER POPULATION LIST PRE BY: h.Patterson DATE: August 13, 1985 QA/QC REINSPECTION ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR '
POPULATION DESCRIPTION COMPLETION DISCIPLINE POPULATION DATES Concrete Placement (CONC) 8/07/85 Structural Steel (STEL) 8/07/85 Fill & Backfill Placement (Fill) 8/01/85 Liners (LINR) 8/8/85 Fuel Pool Liner (PPLR) 8/8/86 Large Bore Pipe Supports - Rigid (LBSR) 7/24/85Rev 1 Large Bore Pipe Supports - Non-Rigid (LESN) 7/24/85Rev 1 STRUCTURAL Small Bore Pipe Supports (SBPS) 7/24/85Rev 1 (S) Pipe Whip Restraints (PWRE)
Instrument Pipe / Tube Supports (INSP) 6/19/85 8/06/85 g
Cat 1 Conduit Supports (COSP) 8/07/83 RVAC Duct Supports (HVDS) 8/08/85Rev 1 O Conduit (CDUT) 7/10/85Rev 1 Cable (CABL) 7/18/85Rev 1 ELECTRICAL Cable Tray (CATT) 7/19/85Rev 1 (E) Electrical Equipment (EEIN) 6/12/85 Instrumentation Equipment (ININ) 6/13/85 RVAC Ducts and Pisaums (DU?L) 8/14/85Rev 1 BVAC Equipment Installation (HVIN) 7/13/85 Field Fabricated Tanks (FFTA) 7/26/85Rev 1 Mechanical Equipment Installation (MEIN) 8/10/85 t
Large Bore Piping Configuration (LBCO) 6/26/85 Small Bore Piping Configuration (SBCO) 6/26/85 MECHANICAL Large Bore Pipe - Welds / Material (LBUM) 6/26/85 (M) Small Bore Pipe and Instrument Pipe /
Tube Welds / Material (SBWM) 6/26/85 Piping System Bolted Joints / Materials (PBOM) 6/26/85
! ISSUE!_ APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP O
]/85 1 2 3 . 4 5 SSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP 6 7 8 0 10 11
EXHBIT 2 Page 1 of 10 WORK PROCESS DEFINITION FOR LARGE BORE PIPE SUPPORT - NON-RIGID POPULATION GROUP (LBSN)
INTRODUCTION i
The Large Bore Pipe Support - Non-Rigid Population includes supports for piping systems (21/2 inch nominal pipe
- size an'd large'r) all of which are safety related Safety Class 1, 2, or 3 and Seismic Category I. It ,
includes only those supports which utilize constant or variable spring hangers or snubbers as components. It includes all the items shown on the pipe support detail drawings (BRHs).
The installation of all supports within this population requires the following work processes: ,
Fabrication - includes all activities prior to installing the support in its final location in the plant, i.e., before connecting jdh the support structure or components to the building structure and the vendor supplied componer.t item to the pipe attachment point.
The process also includes modification of vendor supplied catalog '
items.
Installation - inc odes all activities re ;uired to install the support at its final location in accorda .e with the pipe support
) detail drawing (BRH) and the constructio- hanger package.
Welding - includes all welding processes t.uring fabrication and installation. .
The following work process descriptions demonstrate that reasonable honogeneity does exist at the work process level. Regardless of the type of support, size of pipe being supported or material and components used, each work process involves: a common specification, a common construction procedure, a common construction management organization, ,
common craft labor performing the same basic types of operations, a common inspection instruction, and a common inspection organization. A sufficient number of samples will be randomly selected free the Large Bore Pipe Support-Non-Rigid population group to ensure that the required confidence level is achieved for each work process. This approach will permit meaningful conclusions to be drawn regarding the construction adequacy of all small bore pipe supports.
a
EXHBIT 3 COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW TEAM POPULATION DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 2 v0PULATION NAME: Large Bore Pipe Supports-Rigid PREPARED BY: k M b,m DATE: June 17, 1985 RESTONSIBLE QA/QC SUPPORT ENGINEER SYSTEM, COMPONENTS, AND STRUCTURES:
SupportsforpipingsyskensdesignatedinSection17AoftheFSARthat ,
are safety related and are Safety Class 1, 2 and 3 and Seismic Category I. (see attachment)
POPULATION BOUNDARY:
Supports for large bore piping (2 -inch nominal pipe and larger) '
meeting the criteria for Safety Class 1, 2, and 3 and Seismic Category 1.
Support components as shown on pipe support drawings. (e.g. structural steel, NF welds, std. mfg. components, plate, bolting material, anchor d bolts and nuts HILTl type and Richmond Studs, etc.)
Supports that are construction complete end QC accepted up to and
. ,j) including June 17, 1985.
Supports located in Units 1, 2 and common areas.
All supports which are safety related.
Only supports which utilize anchors, guides, rigid restraints, and three dimensional re.streints.
ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE POPULATION:
Hydraulic or mechanical snubbers, pipe whip restraints and spring hangers.
Small bore pipe supports.
Large bore pipin;;.
Building structural members.
f f QA/QC LEAD DISCIPLINE ENGINEER PROVED BY: ///M M*N N*- DATE: /S[6 QA/QC REINSPECTION ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR
- _ - . - _ - - .y- - y
EXHBIT 4 COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW TEAM POPULATION ITEMS LIST
, Page 1 of 1 POPULATION NAME: Large Bore Ploe Sueports - Rigid PREPARED BY: ...~
DATE: Julv 30, 1985 RESPONSIBLE QA/QC SUPPORT ENGINEER REV: 1 POPULATIONS LIST SOURCE:
The Hanger Installation Tracking System, commonly known as " HITS" is the source document for this population. The HITS program is a computerized report which contains information for all supports (i.e., Small Bore and Large Bore) as to the system, unit, building, room number, support mark number and safety class. In addition, data pertaining to pipe size, .
integral attachments and construction status is provided.
From the entire HITS program, a listing of Rigid Large Bore Pipe Supports was segregated out for only supports which are safety related, construction complete and QC accepted. Attachment 2 lists supports that make up the Large Bore Pipe Supports - Rigid population. A correction was made on page ,
582 of Attachment 2, regarding one of the Random Samples.
BASIS FOR ACCEPTING THE LIST: (Refer to Attachment 1)
A Acceptance of the list is based on random sample verification of the entire HITS program content utilizing a separate source for both safety and non-safety related supports. The separate source was a listing of Brown and Root P. anger Location (BRHL) Drawings. Once the BREL Drawing Sample was established, all supports contained on the sample drawings were checked against HITS to verify completeness es to total support listings. An '
additional check was performed to verify the accuracy of support construction status. It was established that the Hanger Mark Number and Construction Status Content of the HITS program was accurate and could be used as a source for Large Bore Pipe Supports population.
BASIS FOR ACCEPTING ANY ADDITIONAL ITEMS: Not Applicable APPROVED BY: &k e DATE: I44. d 68E QA/QC LEAD DISCIPLINE ENGINEER
' APPROVED BY: I-QA/QC REINSPECTION ENGINEERING b ----- DATE:J M [ /ffi SUPERVISOR
-'c
EXHBIT 5 fs Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT "A" Large Bore Pipe Supports-Non-Rigid Population List of Source Document for Each Attribute Attribute Source *
- 1. Identification B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28, Rev. 31, Section 3.2
- 2. Location and B&R CP-CPM 9.10, Rev. 14. Section 4.7 (Unit 2)
Orientation TUCCO CP-EI-4.5-1, Rev. 12. Sections 3.2.3, 3.2.4 (Unit 1 and Common)
Gibbs and Hill Specification No. 2323-MS-43A, Rev. 5, Section 3.5.3 [For pipe nominal vall thickness).
- 3. Configuration *
. A. Components B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31, Section 3.3 B. Material B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31, Sections 3.2 and 3.3 C. Installation B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28 Rev 31 Attachment 3 -
D. Clearances B&R CP-CPM 9.10, Rev. 14. Sections 4.7.4, 4.7.5, and 4.11.1
( ) E. Baseplates B&R CP-CPM 9.10, Rev. 14 Sections 4.9 and 4.10 l
4 Bolting A. Engagement B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28 Rev. 31,*Section 3.3.1.4 .
, B. Contact B&R CP-CPM 9.10, Rev. 14 Section 4.12 l . ;
1 C. Richmond Inserts B&R CP-CPM 9.10, Rev. 14 Section 4.12.4 l
D. Locking Devices ASME III, Subsection NF B&R CP-CPM 9.10, Rev. 14 Section 4.17 E. U-Bolts B&R CP-QP 11.2-1, Rev. 18, Section 3.10 B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28 Rev. 31, Section 3.3.1.4 F. Torque B&R CP-CPM 9.10, Rev. 14. Section 4.13
! C. Edge Distance B&R QI-QAP-11.1-28. Rev. 29. Section 3.3.3.
H. Grout-in Anchor TUSI CP-EI-13.0-3, Rev. 1
- 5. Piping Welds A. Location B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31, Section 3.4.4 s_ B. Size ASME III, Subsection NB, NC, ND, Paragraphs 4427 C. Profile B&R QI-QAP 11.1-28, Rev. 31 Section 3.4.4 D. Reinforcement ASME III. Subsections ND, NC, ND. Paragraphs 4426
r-----,---.-,,e ,v , , -----,- ,---- -, -- s--c-----w - - - - -- ~-nw w=-*- g* - * - - - w -
EXHBIT 6 COM.'ICHEJ PEAK RISPCNSE TIfei ,
ERC DP/IACCN RI?OK! (:R)
- v. -
DR SUl#.5ER ORIt'.,TJATCR ; A. ..
I S LESR-204-ORS f. WW to 2E45 IDENTIFICA"'ICN OF ICf C " EYE. R.ODS 090 SUPPORT
- LINIT CC.-t-017 011 -5 43 R.
owG.*Cc-t-o 17 ott S93R. REV.3 ONE C 740 ] c:MMCN SYSTEM AND LOCATION CC SYSTEM. ShTE. GUARD ELOG. ROOM 69
= L.DC A7)od ELEV. StG.'-3 ~1' WORTH 4:3 5 1*-8 ~ East E-S DW G.
- BRl4L-Cc-1 -S E-oot Rtu.5 AEQUIREMENT (CHECILIST ITDi NO'. _S.A.6 L QI. -O?.7 RtV.1 PARA.S.S.\ F VE.RtFY T.YE rod T%RE AD ENGACtutOT "TMPmJG M 'TMC StGMT Motc., og. -
.6
\DE7IAECN SdTM T.YE.~it.005 "TMitAD E.WG AGtMtNT 20utDN'T EE. Ve v J20t. TO NO S tGMT M0 Lt.S OR. SNAt? STAM93 YCLMD
'a i
b TIS 20 No O'Frsorso (INC:.uDr JuSTtr CAT:oM AS R au:RrD) ;
1 i
l I
8llLw FIR 5T' illvIr4Ea icir&bd ul.% \
DATE d ORIGINATCR v<~~
7AI.ID DR h TIS NO (INC!.UDE JUSTI?! CATION AS REQUIRED)
T/u Vch . p,,yo ll'Mu'; .7 m, -% L s nc ' ^ 'L' %
'.' 41 .
- u W. c'; 's . 6 l
' " L'., ov/.:>.'5',-
(',J/e, + ff.. ~. r.sa ? .
\x '
.i FIRST RIVIr4IR DATE es. T+ . m - /0/z4ff:r /M SECOR REVII'4ER DATE ORIGINA-~?. DATE
- - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - ~ ' - - ~ - ^ - - - ' ~ ~
EXHEIT 7 A
- ,u.:f:CF.I FIAK ?.II? NIE TIl_M 3 ATE- t SIGN
- F~CANCI I*.*A*.!AT:CN <
i M ALCAT*CN NUM3ER: T S - LBS R - 7.04- O f2- 5 -SE E EHEI* 1 0F Z PREPARER: ALAN Q. bQK.S O[w DATI: Ii 4. /AE QAiQC SSIG DISCI?LINE ENGINEER ,
CHECKER: -'k
- [f* ATYE4)RA IM- [e)
T DATE: U~IJ U f\
v THE TOLLOWING ANALYSIS SUPPORTS THE CONCLUSION CONCERNING THE SAFETT SIGNITIC6NCE OF THE CONDITION DESCRIBED IN THE DEVIATION REPORT NUMBER I.s-tesR 'Zo4-Ot2-E ANALYSLS:
ATr ei SvT15: DEvi ATtON :
Qr- 027, EEEN 1, PARA 5.81 F ATTRt SvTe S A. Reaviess E.NE Ro O THRE A CD ENG AGEMENT BE Vert FIED WROUGH THE SIGHT HOL E OR BY ST A R STAT % P. AIO StGHT HOLES OR STAR STAMPS EYlST ON THE STR\.IT THERE FORE tMREAO EMG AGE MENT cANuoT BE VERI FIED. '
~
SAreTy c o u c e m.w :
tu Aoeou ATE THeeAo ewsAGew w couto Resuut- tu STRUT FALLURE AuO THE ASSEMSty wouto No LowC2ER RESTR,tCT l THE McW NIEMT OF THE SANTy RELATeD PLP t MC= D O R i N Co pumur opeRAvius cow oiTio us. .
I i REVIEWE BY: -
b Date: ,
CONCLUSION:
~~*
BASED UFON THIS ANALYSIS. THE REPORTED CONDIT*0N WILL NO RESUI.T IN THE INA3IL'II 0F THE AF7ECTED ITDi TO PERTORM ITS INTENDED SAFETY RELA.es rUNCTION.
, A s7
- !EWED BT- k c \
QA/QC SSEC LEAD DISC *?LlyE E
/
3ELR DATE: //!/8 t[
/
APPROVED BY: - DATE: //-2 2 -B5~ _
QA/0.C 55EG 5L.PY.RV.50R c, . ..m . , :.. . ~ .
-