ML20202J066
| ML20202J066 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1986 |
| From: | TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202J051 | List:
|
| References | |
| DAP-1, NUDOCS 8607170017 | |
| Download: ML20202J066 (18) | |
Text
e TITLE PREPARATION APO REVIEW OF CRITERIA LISTS U
NUMBER DAP-I Revision Prepared Date Reviewed Date f;pproved Date 0 R 8[#/#
V. Newman W WW n i I
y ,, , y f "l4kf 2
y'*ll85 blgf Y I2-l9lW 3
~ 'l' N & 6lfi/5 o
$$8"$00cd$Ioook45
'?
A PDR
- CONTROLLED COPY
$ NO $ 0 l
TN-85-6262/ l i
8 dp TABLE OF CONTENTS Section P,,gge.
C ov e r S he e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Tab l e o f Con t e n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . il 1.0 P UR P O S E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 2.0 SCOPE..................................................... I 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 4.0 I NS T R U CT I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5.0 DO CU ME NT AT I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 ATTACHMENTS O ^ caireai^'istroaa^T - ^-i E M CHANIC- REV IE W 1 ? l CS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-l C ELECTRICAL REVIEW TOPICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-l D CIVIL REV IEW TOPI CS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 E DESIGN CRITERI A LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-l F DISCIPLINE / SUBJECT CODES ............................... F-l i
l s
TN-85-6262/1 ii
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE t] Number: DAP-l
Title:
PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 CRITERIA LISTS 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure establishes the methods for preparation, review, opproval, and control of criteria lists used in the Design Adequacy Program. It defines the methods by which design criterio and commitments are identified and verified prior to use in subsequent phases of the Design Adequacy Program.
2.0 SCOPE The scope of this procedure encompasses preparation, review, approval, and control of design criterio lists used in the conduct of the self-initiated ospects of the Design Adequacy Program. The scope of the self-initiated evoluotions includes the Mechanical Systems, Electrical, l&C, and Civil / Structural disci-plines. Verification octivities in the Piping and Supports discipline and in the Cable Troy and Conduit Supports oreo may use this procedure or a specific Discipline instruction developed in occordonce with DAP-10.
3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 Criterion l A criterion is any statement of a performance, design feature, or design requirement which a system, structure, or component must meet in order to be capable of performing its design function or to be in compliance with a project requirement or commitment.
TN-85-6262/l Page 1 of 8
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-1
Title:
PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 CRITERI A LISTS 3.1.2 Commitment A commitment is any statement made by the project as part of the public record which identifies a system performance, design feature, or design requirement which will be met by the project.
3.1.3 Descriptive Statement A descriptive statement specifies or describes system parameters, CPSES plant features, operator actions, or intended plant operations which do not prescribe or offect how the system ochieves its design function or complies with require-ments.
3.1.4 Source Document A source document is any document opplicable to CPSES that identifies criterio, com: met ;, c requirerrmts. I rincipal source documents include FSAR, Regulatory Guides, Westinghouse interface documents, Code of Federal Regulo-tions, and industry standards, such as IEEE and ASTM publications. Source documents are those documents from which statements of criteria and commit-ments are directly extracted in the compilation of criteria lists.
l l
3.1.5 Originating Document l
Originating documents are those in which statements are mode which ultimately lead to the identification of a source document and criteria or commitments.
For example, the FSAR serves as on originating document when it states that CPSES is in compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.XX. The Regulatory Guide is then the source document for the resulting commitments.
O TN-85-6262/1 Page 2 of 8
COMANCFE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE O- " -ser: o^e-i Ti'i = eate ^ a ^Tio s ^ " o aEvie w OP CRITERI A LISTS sevisien: 3 3.2 Responsibilities 3.2.1 Review Team Leoder The Review Team Leoder shall approve the initial issuance of the criterio lists and all subsequent revisions to the lists.
3.2.2 Design Adequacy Program Monoger (DAP Monoger)
The Design Adequacy Program Monoger shall review the criterio lists to ensure consistency and completeness and recommend opproval to the Review Team Leader.
3.2.3 Discipline Coordinators O The DiMpline Cc~iinators em responsible for assigning preparers and reviewers to aevi a the cri a list.
4.0 INSTRUCTION
. 4.1 Initial Preparation of Criterio List in general, project personnel are responsible for the initial preparation of the design criteria lists; however, the DAP Monoger may direct that initial lists be developed by third party personnel. The lists are to be o compilation of all criteria and commitments used in the CPSES design of the systems discussed in Section 2.0 of this procedure.
The DAP Monoger and the Discipline Coordinators shall determine the number and scope of each criterio list.
TN.85-6262/l Page 3 of 8
l l
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-1
Title:
PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 CRITERIA LISTS The development of the criteria lists shall be occomplished by review of the list ogoinst the CPSES FSAR and Safety Evoluotion Report,10CFR50, Appendix A General Design Criterio, appropriate project correspondence, and opplicable Regulatory Guides and industry standards.
The criteria and commitments shall be listed in the format given in Attachment A to this procedure. The following odditional requirements apply to this attachment:
o Each criterio list shall be assigned a document control number.
o The criteria are to be sequentially numbered in each list.
o The description shall be o concise statement of the criterion. Where possible, the criterion should be a verbo-tim statement from the porticular source document (e.g.,
o verbatim statement extracted from on FSAR paro-groph).
o All opplice e sou: _e documents for each criterion are to be listed. Multiple tier documents (e.g., on FSAR para-graph which, in turn, references a Regulatory Guide) should all be included.
o Eoch criterion shall be assigned a number corresponding to the oppropriate design review topic. Listings of the review topics for each discipline are given in Attachments B, C, and D to this procedure, Draf t criteria lists and subsequent revised lists shall be issued to the Design f
Adequacy Program Manager for review.
4.2 Third Porty Review of Criteria Lists Upon receipt of the lists, the DAP Manager shall distribute the lists to the oppropriate Discipline Coordinators who shall distribute them to the individual TN-85-6262/l Page 4 of 8 l
l
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-1
Title:
PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 J
CRITERIA LISTS discipline reviewers. The DAP Monoger shall determine which Coordinator shall have primary review responsibility. When a list is developed by the third pcrty, the criterio list shall be provided to the project for comment.
The lists shall be reviewed for completeness, consistency, and occurocy. The objectives of the review include:
o A determination of whether all criterio have been identi-fled (completeness).
o A determination of whether the criteria are occurately stated, o An evoluotion of whether the stated criterio are consis-tent.
This review shall be conducted in accordance with Section 4.1 of DAP-4 and shall .
-O be dece m eet d ie e ferm simiier te ^ttech m ent 4 te thet D i e grocedere.
Commt is on a criterio Li shall be resolved among the developer of the criterio list, the reviewer, and the Discipline Coordinator.
4.3 Approval and issuance of Criterio Lists Eoch criteria list may be issued as "Rev. 0" when the discipline coordinator believes that the criterio list contains all opplicable basic (e.g., FSAR level) criteria and is complete enough to worront development of detailed checklists.
This approvo! (Rev. 0) does not require completion of the Design Criterio Review Checklist (Attochment A to DAP-4). Subsequent revisions of criteria lists she!?
require completion of the DAP-4 criterio review checklist before the subsequent revision is opproved.
The criteria lists shall be reviewed by the Review Team Leader or his designee and shall be documented on the design criteria cover sheet (see Attachment E).
TN-85-6262/l Page 5 of 8
COMANCFE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-1
Title:
PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 CRITERI A LISTS His signature signifies that _ the criterio have been properly identified and checked, and that the requirements of this procedure were met. Distribution of the criteria lists shall be os stated in Section 5.0 of this procedure.
The cover sheet will be used for maintaining document revision control.
The cover sheet revision block signoff for Rev. O and all subsequent revisions, shall be os follows:
o The originator or lead discipline preparer shall initial the
'BY" block.
o The appropriate Discipline Coordinator or designee shall initial the reviewed "RVWD" block.
o The Design Adequacy Monoger shall sign the recommend opproval "RECC" block.
o The Review Team Leoder shall sign the opproved "APPD" block.
Af ter opproval, each mechonical, electrical, and I&C criterio list shall be submitted to Westinghouse Electric Corporation for review and comment. The submittal to Westinghouse shall be occomplished by the DAP Monoger by transmittal of the criteria list to TUCCO.
Westinghouse shall be requested to review the criterio and commitments and make one of -the following determinations:
o The criteria and commitments offect only systems that do not interface with the Westinghouse NSSS scope of suppfy-o The criteria and commitments offect systems that inter-face with the Westinghouse NSSS scope of supply. The criteria and commitments are consistent with Westing-house interface requirements and Westinghouse ha:; no comments.
O T"-8s-6262 ei eco 6 <8
COMANCPE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-1
Title:
PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 CRITERIA LISTS o The criterio and commitments offect systems that inter- .
foce with the Westinghouse NSSS scope of supply. The criterio and commitments are consistent with Westing- ,
house interface requirements but Westinghouse has com-ments or clarifications regarding the criterio and commit-ments, o The criterio and commitments offect systems that inter-face with the Westinghouse NSSS scope of supply. The criterio and commitments are not consistent with -
Westinghouse interfoce requirements.
Where Westinghouse has comments or where Westinghouse notes inconsistencies with interface requirements, Westinghouse shall be requested to describe their comments or corrections in detail. The Discipline Coordinator or his designee shall resolve Westinghouse commer.ts in a timely fashion.
4.4 Revisions to Criterio Lists O Revision to the criterio lists may be necessary, subsequent to the initial opproval and ;uot of e lists. revistor. may be for ine purpose of odding or deleting criterio, revising existing criterio, or making corrections.
Revisions to the criterio lists shall be identified by documenting a description of the enonges on the design criterio list cover sheet (Attochment E). Eoch revision shall be sequentially numbered. The opproved revision will be distributed as stated in Section 5.0 of this procedure. The opproval signoff process for each revision will be identical to that for the Rev. O criterio list issuance discussed in Section 4.3 The specific revisions shall be indicated in the body of the list by'o vertical line in the right-hand margin. These revision lines shall be corried only until the following revision to the list is issued.
e O- TN-es-6262ei eeee > ef 8 1
l
.. COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-1
Title:
PREPARATION AND REV:EW OF Revision: 3 CRITERI A LISTS 5.0 DOCUMENTATION The criteria lists shall be written, issued, and maintained in the format given in Attochment A to this procedure.
Criteria list revisions shall be controlled by the use of a cover sheet in the format given in Attachment E to this procedure.
Distribution for initial issuonce, and all subsequent revisions to the criteria lists, will be the responsibility of the DAP Monoger. The distribution will include, but not be limited to:
, o Review Team Leader o DAP Manager o C RT Seni Review 1 x om Leaders o Discipline Coordinators o Additional personnel as selected by the DAP Monoger.
After opproval, each criterio list shall be assigned a control identification l number by the oppropriate Discipline Coordinator. The control number shall be of the following format:
DAP-CR-XX-YYY o-9 Sequential Number Discipline Code (See Attachment F)
O TN-85-6262/l Page 8 of 8
. ATTACHMEtG A CRITERIA LIST FORMAT Criterion No. Description Source Applicable Review Topic
- .
- l l
l I
l O
O TN-85-6262/1 A-1
, - - - . --..~,y__ , ,g ,.____.,._.y. ..- ,. ,,. ,,,,,,__mm,o_
ATTACHMENT B MECHANICAL REVIEW TOPICS TOPIC NUMBER TOPIC TITLE M00 Mechanical Scope Validation M01 System Operating Modes M02.1 Operating Limits: NPSH M02.2 Operating Limits: Maximum & Minimum Con-ditions M02.3 Operating Limits: Overpressure Conditions M02.4 Operating Limits: Steam Flow Requirements M03 Heat Removal Requirements M04 Water Sources M05.1 Component Functional Requirements: Pumps and Drivers M05.2 Component Fuactional Requirements: Volves and Operators M05.3 Component Functional Requirements: Tonks M05.4 Component Functional Requirements: Piping M06 Single Failure /FMEA M07 Support Systems A Mr' Class 5 Piping /_}_\
MC HVAC System Performance M10.1 Component Functional Requirements: Ventilo-tion Filtration Units M10.2 Component Functional Requirements: Fans M10.3 Component Functional Requirements: Control Dompers M10.4 Component Functional Requirements: Air Con-ditioners M10.5 Component Functienal Requirements: Cooling Coils M10.6 Component Functional Requirements: Water Chillers M10.7 Component Functional Requirements: Ducts and Duct Accessories MIl Control Room Habitability Ml2 Pressure Vessels M13 Heat Exchangers Ml4 Main Steam isolation, Feedwater Isolation, Containment Purge MIS Safety Volve MI6 Relief Volve MI7 Screens Ml8 Chemical Eductors TN-85-6262/l B-l
p\
ATTACHMENT B MECHANICAL REVIEW TOPICS (Continued) .
TOPIC NUMBER TOPIC TITLE M19 Expansion Joint M20 Mechanical Penetrations M26 System / Component Sofety Classification M27 High Energy Line Breaks M28 Internal Flooding M29.1 Missile Protection: Internal and Tu dine Mis-sites M29.2 Missile Protection: Tornado Missiles M30 Seismic Qualification M31 M32 Radiation Protection and Dose Assessment Post-Accident Combustible Gas Control g
M33 Containment Pressure / Temperature Analysis M34 Containment Sump Design Q
V M35 M36 Welding Design Postulated Hazards M39 Radiation Monitoring M40 Post / :cident Sump Chemistry M41 External Flooding M43 Bolonce of Plant Pump and Volve Operability M44 Miscellaneous Thermal / Hydraulics M45 Mechanical Erection M46 Piping Supports M47 Containment Spray Nozzles M48 Radioactive Waste Filter Cask O
TN-85-6262/l B-l
ATTACHMENT C ELECTRICAL REVIEW TOPICS Topic Number Topic Description El System Operating Limits E2 System Operating Modes E3 Electrical Chorocteristics E4 Electrical Lood Capacity E5 Lood Shedding, Transfers, and Sequencing E6 Control E7 Instrumentation EB Component Functiono! Requirements E9 Single Foilure/FMEA E10 Support Systems EII Multi-Discipline Considerations E12 Equipment Installation Design El3 Emergency Lighting h E14 Hydrogen Monitoring 1
I O
TN-85-6262/1 C-1
. - - - - - - - , ,.m.. _ . , . - . _or . - . . . . . ,%..__,r,-_..--._v_._,-._,,,,,w - . ~ , - . _ _ - _ . - . . - - - _ , , . _ . . - .-...--.....,-.-,,,,,ee--.,--,
ATTACHMENT D CIVIL REVIEW TOPICS TOPIC NUMBER TOPIC DESCRIPTION C l.0 LOAD DETERMINATION C2.0 LOAD DISTRIBUTION / ANALYSIS C3.0 LOAD COMBINATIONS C4.0 CONCRETE DESIGN METHOD AND CRITERIA C5.0 STEEL DESIGN METHODS AND CRITERIA C6.0 FOUNDATIGN DESIGN METHODS AND CRITERIA C7.0 C8.0 SOIL SUPPORTS / ANCHORAGE DESIGN METHODS g
Ab'D CRITERIA C9.0 OTHER STRUCTURES DESIGN METHODS AND CRITERIA C10.0 CONNECTIONS / ANCHORAGE DESIGN METHODS AND CRITERIA C l l.0 l-EAVY LOADS DROP Cl 2.0 COMPUTER CODES C l 3.0 SPECIFICATlON PREPARATION C l4.0 TESTING /SPECI AL STUDIES /SPECIAL TOPICS O
O TN-85-6262/l D-l
ATTACHMENT E DESKN CRITERIA LIST SYSTEM / DESIGN ACTIVITY .
DISCIPLINE DAP/ DOC NUMBER
?
- O L
REV. DATE j CESCRJPTION BY RVWD RECC APPD e
O TN-85-6262/1 E-l
- ---,,,,--,__,, ,c..---, .
- ATTACHMENT F COMANCE PEAK DESIGN ADEGUACY PROGRAM DISCIPLIE/ SUBJECT CODES Code Discipline C/S Civil / Structural P Piping and Supports M Mechanical EIC Electrical / Instrumentation PGl Programmatic / Generic O implications -
E Electrical
- I Instrumentation *
- NOTE Use of "E" and "I" codes are optional alternatives to the "EIC" code. EIC may be used for both Electrical and I&C. "E" may be used when the document is relevant only to the electrical discipline. "1" may be used when the document is relevant only to Instrumentation and Control.
O TN-85-6262/1 -
F-l Attachment F-
__ _ . , . _ _ _ . - . . _ _ _ . - _ _ , , _ . _ . . - . . - _ , , . . . _ _ _ _ . . - . . _ , , . . - . , _ _ . _ _ . , -, . _ , _ _ .