ML20202J316
| ML20202J316 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1986 |
| From: | Honekamp J TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202J051 | List:
|
| References | |
| DAP-15, NUDOCS 8607170057 | |
| Download: ML20202J316 (21) | |
Text
.
e TITLE TRAINING APO QUALIFICATIONS
(
NUMBER DAP-15 Revision Prepared Date Reviewed Date Approved Date 0 J Honekamp ,
/0[ g / fo g-
. /Muky o i46 ,
'h h "N } & zlu/n
/ V bk D 500 5 0nes-suuls ,
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pooe l
Cove r S hee t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Tab le of Con ten t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 l.0 P URP OS E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 2.0 SCOPE..................................................... I 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ;
4.0 I NST R U CTI ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 -
5.0 DOCUMENTATI ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ATTACHMENTS l A TR AI NING RE COR D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 B RECORD OF ASSIGED RE ADING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-l C RECORD OF TRAINING SESSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 D CPRT OBJECTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-l E REQUEST FOR EVALUATION OF INSPECTOR
- QUALIFICATION RECORDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-l F THIRD PARTY PERSONEL ROSTER ......................... F-1 i
n i
1 TN-85-6262/15 li
.. . ~. - . -
. COMANCE PE AK RESPONSE TE AM - DESI.N ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: I 1.0 PURPOSE ,
This procedure defines the methods to be used to occomplish, maintain, and document the training and qualifications of personnel as required by the CPRT Progrom Plan.
2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies to the training and qualification of personnel assigned to -
the conduct of the Design Adequacy Program and to the resolution of TRT issues in the Civil / Structural, Mechanical and Miscellaneous Areas (CSM). This procedure supersedes Work Instruction CSM-1; however, training records compiled under CSM-1 shall be deemed to meet the requirements of this -
procedure and do not need to be revised.
[
- 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES l
3.I Definitions 3.1.1 Third Porty Personnel
- Non-O'SES project personnel assigned by the Review Team Leader to manage or conduct the reviews and evoluotions performed under the DAPs or the CSM 15AP.
3.1.2 Project Personnel Personnel ossigned by the CPSES Project to assist the Third Party personnel in the implementation of the DAP and the CSM ISAPs.
I i TN-85-6262/lS Page I of 11 1
l
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: I m
)
3.1.3 Support Personnel Administrative and clerical personnel assigned to support the DAP and the CSM ISAPs.
3.1.4 Third Party inspection and Test Personnel Non-CPSES project personnel assigned to the DAP and the CSM ISAPs who perform inspections and tests within the scope of the CPRT Policy on Testing and Inspection Personnel used in Third Party Verification Activities.
3.2 Responsibilities 3.2.1 Review Team Leader o Approves of the assignment of Third Party personnel to V the CPRT program through the DAP and TRT (CSM) personnel roster. b 3.2.2 Design Adequacy Prograrn Monoger (DAP Monoger) o Designates a Training Coordinator for the DAP.
o identifies to the DAP Training Coordinator the individuals assigned to DAP for whom o training record will be maintained and their training requirements. This notifi-cation may be via written or oral notice. The DAP Monoger may delegate this activity to the Discipline Coordinator. This notification shall be documented in the training record on Attochment A.
o Notifies the Training Coordinator when revisions of docu-d ments have been issued which offect personnel assigned to the DAP. He specifies the extent to which retraining is required for each procedure os a result, based on the noture and extent of the procedure revision.
TN-85-6262/15 Page 2 of II
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: 1 O
V 3.2.3 TRT issues Monoger o Designates a Training Coordinator for the CSM/TRT issues.
o identifies to the TRT Training Coordinator the individuals assigned to CSM/TRT issues for whom o training record '
will be maintained and the training requirements. This notification may be via written or oral notice. This notification shall be documented in the training record on Attochment A.
o Notifies the Training Coordinator when revisions of docu-ments have been issued which offect personnel assigned to b
resolution of CSM/TRT issues. He specifies the extent to which retraining is required for each procedure, based on the nature and extent of the procedure revision.
3.2.4 Training Coordinators d o Establish a DAP training file, to be maintained in occord-once with DAP I4, which documents that the training requirements identified by the DAP Monoger have been met. .
o Establish a CSM/TRT training file, which documents that the training requirements identified by the CSM/TRT Monoger have been met.
o Notify each individual of their required reading assign-ments and obtain written confirmation that all required b
training has been completed within the time frome estab-lished by the DAP Monoger or CSM/TRT Monoger. The Training Coordinator is responsible to notify the DAP Monoger or CSM/TRT Monoger of problems in completing the indicated training.
3.2.5 DAP Discipline Coordinators o Determine whether individuals are qualified to perform assigned DAP octivities.
O j TN-85-6262/15 Page 3 of II
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TE AM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: 1 J
4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 Approval of DAP and CSM Third Porty Personnel The DAP and CSM Review Team Leader shall maintain a roster of all third-party personnel opproved by him. He may delegate responsibility for maintenance of the roster to the DAP Manager who may maintain the roster for CSM personnel as well as DAP personnel. The roster shall be in the format of Attachment F.
For third-party personnel assigned to the project prior to December 15,1985, the DAP Manager shall develop the initial DAP and CSM roster by January 10, 1986.
The initial DAP roster shall be submitted to the RTL together with resumes and objectivity forms for review and approval. The RTL shall indicate his approval of those personnel by memo to the DAP Manager and to the TRT issues Monoger.
/~'N ' A In his memorondum, the RTL shall note any limitations on the assignments of the 4.h personnel because of either limitations of their qualifications or information contained in their objectivity forms.
For third-party personnel assigned to the project offer December I4,1985, the
! person recommending on individual for assignment to DAP or CSM octivities
.shall submit to the RTL the following information through on Action Memo:
o individuol's nome o Proposed position o Applicable discipline o Bases for acceptance (e.g., interview, personnel know-ledge, recommendations of others, etc.)
o Whether a resume and objectivity form are required (if not required, the bases for not requiring the forms shall be stated)
O TN-85-4262/15 Page 4 of 11
'l
, . - - - - - - - - . - - - , , , - - , , ,.. , -- - _-,--n, . ..- , n.-,
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE
, Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: I o Attoch to the Action Memo copies of the completed objectivity form and resume.
For administrative and clerical personnel, only the individual's nome and position need to be submitted from the above list. The Action Memo shall otso identify the person responsible for specification of the individual's training requirements.
After the review, the RTL shall odvise the originator of the request by memo whether the individual is occepted and whether there are any conditions or limitations on the assignment of the individual. The RTL shall provide copies of his response to the DAF Monoger, the TRT issues Monoger, and the oppropriate d
Training Coordinator. The RTL (or his designee) sho!! enter the individual's name on the roster offer opproval.
The above Action Memo is not required for personnel assigned prior to December
, 15, 1985. The initial roster developed by the DAP Manager shall note those
! Individuals assigned by to this date by entering the phrase " Initial Roster" in the
" Recommended By" column.
4.2 Training Records -
The personnel qualification and training records needed to meet the require-ments of the CPRT Program Plan ore:
o Resume covering education and work experience for Third Party personnel with technico! responsibilities.
o A training record that identifies the required training for each individual identified by the DAP or CSM/TRT Monogers (Attochment A).
o A record that confirms that the individuals identified have completed their required training (Attachments B ond C).
TN-85-6262/15 Page 5 of II 1
l
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-IS
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: l
/ h U
o CPRT Objectivity Questionnaire for Third Party personnel -
(Attachment D).
o A record for Third Party inspection and Test personnel (other than those assigned through the QA/QC Review Team Leader) that confirms that their qualification re-cords have been reviewed and are acceptable (Attach-ment E).
The Training Coordinator shall establish and maintain training and qualification files in occordonce with DAP-14 ond CSM/TRT instructions os oppropriate.. ,
4.3 Training Requirements The DAP Monoger and CSM/TRT Monoger shall identify to the appropriate Training Coordinator the training requirements, required completion dates of training (per Section 4.4), and qualification records needed for each individual w assigned to their programs. He shall also indicate where o resume or Objectivity
\ Questionnoire is not required because of the scope of the individual's respon-sibility. (Resumes and Objectivity Questionnaires are not required for support personnel).
As a minimum, third party personnel shall be trained on the provisions of the Design Adequocy Procedures applicable to their scope of work, and ISAPs/DSAPs l 'on which they are working. Any combination of lecture, reading assignments, and "on-the-job" training may be used to meet the training requirements.
Consultants who are recognized experts in specific technical areas may be exempted from this requirement provided their role in the implementation of an ISAP or DSAP is limited to providing consultation in their particular oreo of
(
expertise.
l TN-85-6262/15 Page 6 of II
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: I O
The DAP Monoger and the CSM/TRT issues Monoger may delegate the develop-ment of specific training requirements (e.g., specification of particular DAP procedures for which the people should be trained) to others.
4.4 Notification of Training and Completion The Training Coordinators sho!! notify each identified individual of their required reading assignments (and required completion date) and obtain written confirmo-tion that all required training has been completed. Any reasonable period for completion of training may be allowed provided the following requirements are met. Personnel shall complete their training relative to their specific scope of work prior to performing that work; however, this requirement does not apply to work performed during a period of "on-the-job" training. The period of "on-the-job" training shall not exceed 30 days. An individual's initial training assign-ments (including "on the job" training) shall be complete prior to Discipline g
Coordinator approval of any work product developed by the individual. Personnel shall complete their general training (e.g., reading of the opplicable DSAP) within 30 days of their oss*gnment to the DAP or CSM-TRT octivities.
Exceptions to these training completion requirements may be authorized by the RTL (or his designee) If the person requesting the exception proposes actions deemed by the RTL (or his designee) to be adequate to ensure that delay in the completion of the training will not offect DAP work products. The Training Coordinators shall notify their respective monogers of problems in completing the identified training requirements within the time established by the monoger.
4.5 Training of Third Party inspectors and Test Personnel The Training Coordinator for CSM/TRT issues shall obtain o list of Third Party inspection and Test personnel (other than those assigned through the QA/QC RTL) assigned to CSM/TRT issues from each issue Coordinator and submit the TN-85-6262/IS Page 7 of II
COMANCHE PE AK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: I b)
D j oppropriate inspector qualification records for review by the Quality of Con-struction, QA/QC Adequocy Program.
4.6 Re-Training of Third Porty Personnel For revisions of DAD procedures opproved offer December 14, I?95, the DAP Monoger shall issue a memorandum to the Training Coordinators, Discipline coordinators, and others, os appropriate, that specifies the extent to which re-training of personnel is required. Revisions deemed by the DAP Monoger to be minor or administrative in nature shall not require that all DAP personnel originally trained in the procedure be re-trained in the revised procedure. Re-training of personnel originally trained in a procedure shall not be required if the person will not be using the revised procedure.
[
's For revisions prior to December 15, 1985, the DAP Monoger shall determine whether any of the prior revisions to DAP procedures may be considered to be minor revisions such that re-training is not required for personnel trained to o previous revision.
4.7 Qualifications of DAP Personnel The action of occeptance of a proposed individual by the RTL indicates his acceptance of the individuo!'s objectivity and his (or her) knowledge and technical experience for assignment to the DAP or TRT-CSM issues, os oppropriate. For DAP personnel, on additional qualification requirement has been established. DAP personnel shall only review work similar to work they have personally performed before. Furthermore, for design areas unique to nuclear power plants, reviewers shall have personally performed on a commercial nuclear power plant in a previous capacity the some type of design work they are 3 TN-85-6262/15 Page 8'of I l
--. .~ . _ . _ . _ -
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE
. Number: DAP-15
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: I ossigned to review. The implementation of this commitment shall be document-ed as follows:
o Each Discipline Coordinator shall determine, using the criteria below, which design arcos within his discipline are unique to nuclear power plants.
o Each Discipline Coordinator (or his designee) shall advise by memo personnel assigned as reviewers in his discipline of the arcos determined to be unique to nuclear power.
- o The memo shall clso contain the following statement:
"The DAP is committed to performing its work with qualified personnel. Personnel have been selected for participation in the DAP by considering their technical '
expertise and objectivity. To provide additional confi-dence that the experience of our staff is oppropriate for g their review tasks, we have also mode two specific commitments. First, for design areas unique to nuclear O power plants,, reviewers shall on* review design areas which they have personally performed previously on a commercial nuclear power plant.
Second, for all other arcos, reviewers shall only review design arcos where they have had opplicable experience (i.e., need not be commercial nuclear power plants). If you are assigned to work in on area for which you believe you do not meet either of these requirements, notify your supervisor or Discipline Coordinator immediately. Please sign this memo and return it to your Discipline Coordinator to acknowledge that you have been odvised of these requirements, have hod and opportunity to obtain clarification, and have been provided with a list of design areas unique to the nuclear power plants."
o The Discipline Coordinator (or his designee) may provide other guidance and supplementary information as deemed appropriate.
O 4 -,-
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TE AM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE
, Number: DAP-IS
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: 1 O
v For the purpose of this procedure, the following factors shall be considered in the determination of whether o design oreo is unique to nuclear power plants:
- 1. Specialized codes and standards unique to nuclear power plants (e.g., ASME Section lii)
- 2. Regulatory requirements for nuclear power plants that are not specifically documented on criteria lists developed in occordance with DAP-l such that commer-cial nuclear experience is necessary to review the oreo ,
odequately.
- 3. Other design considerations unique to nuclear power plants that are not specifically documented on criterio lists developed in accordance with DAP-l. d These factors shall be opplied to design arcos determined by the Discipline Coordinator to be appropriate in scope for determination of whether the area is unique to nuclear power plants. For example, the design review topics described O' in the Discipline Specific Action Plans (CPRT Program Plon, Appendix C) rnay be used; however, the designation of areas considered not to be unique to nuclear power plants shall not be so brood as to foil to identify those areas that should be considered unique to nuclear power plants.
DAP personnel shall not be assigned to review ony creo for which they do not have applicable experience. Additionally, DAP personnel shall i~. be assigned to review areas unique to nuclear power plants unless they have had experience in performing on a commercial nuclear power plant the work they are to review.
l l
1 j TN-85-6262/IS Poge 10 of I I
~
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-IS
Title:
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS Revision: I l
5.0 DOCUMENTATION The Training Coordinators shall maintain the following records in the DAP files in occordance with DAP-14 and CSM/TRT instructions os oppropriate:
o Individual Training Records (Attachment A) o Individual Resumes o Record of Assigned Reading (Attachment B)
- o Record of Trotning Session (Attochment C) o Objectivity Questionnaire (Attachment D) o Record of Third Party inspection and Test Personnel '
, Qualification (Attochment E).
The RTL (or designee) shall maintain the roster of personnel (Attachment F).
Updated copies of the roster shall be filed in the DAP files.
t Documentation of compliance with Section 4.7 shall be placed in the appropriate DSAP working files. This documentation shall be transferred to the Discipline Files when required by DAP-14.
d I
1 n
u TN-8S-6262/lS PageiI ofII
ATTACHMENT A TRANNG RECORD FOR RERSOt#EL ASSIGEO TO DAP ACTIVITIES OR CIVIL / STRUCTURAL /AECHANICAL/ MIS &LLAEOUS TRT ISSUES NAME: FUNCTION:
ORGANIZATION: RESUME ON FILE? YES (Checked by) (Date)
OBECTIVITY OUESTIONNAIRE ON FILE? YES (Checked by) (Date) i Training History Summary Training Requirement Required Date Method Added/ Deleted By Required Document List (Name/Date)
Document Rev.No.
Compietion Date Training Complete T = Training Session R = Reading Assignment d
l 1
i l1 - .
i l
9 TN-85-(262/15 9 '
8 i
.. . .. . . - . . - . . .. =. .- .-- .. - - _ -
~
~4 ATTACHMENT B RECORD OF ASSIGED READING
, ASSIGED TO:
MY SIGNATURE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT I HAVE READ TE DOCU-MENTS AND HAVE BEEN PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE QUESTIONS ANSWERED TO ENSURE MY UNDERSTANDING.
Required Reading Document identification Rev./Date Completion Date Signature /Date P
i l
f I
l l
REMARKS / COMMENTS TN-85-6262/15 B-l
1 ATTACHMENT C RECORD OF TRANNG SESSION A training session was cor&cted by (Nome) on (date) covering the following subjects:
i 5
List of Attendees: ,
Nome (Print) Signature' l -
- My signature ocknowledges that I have been provided an opportunity to have questions onswered to ensure my understanding of the above subjects.
TN.85-6262/15 C-1
ATTACHMENT D CPRT OBKCTIVITY GLESTiotNAIRE .
, ,l. Nome
- 2. Position on CPRT
- 3. Nome of current employer
- 4. Date this questionnaire is completed S. Do you hold any stock or other securities of Texas Utilities Cornpany?
f & Howe you ever been a director, officer, or employee of Texas Utilitiec Company or any of its subsidiaries?*
(\
- 7. Have you ever entered into o contract, whether oral or written, with Texas Utilities Company or any of its subsidiories, or with another person, firm, or corporation who has octed as o contractor for the Comanche Peak project other than a contract relating to your involvement in the current CPRT program? '
B. Would the mswer to any of the above questions be "yes" if answered by any member of your immediate family (father, mother, spouse, son, or daughter)?
. Have you been promised any odditional compensation or reward or mything of vo!ue i
- by anyone, contingent upon the position you take on any lasue being considered by you in the CPRT program?
- 10. Do you know of any reason, whether inquired @wt in this questionnoire or not, which -
would offect your ability to be tely ob tive in prforming any of the tasks assigned to you under the Comanche oak CPR program.
- 11. Would the answer to any of the above questions be "yes"If answered by your current employer?
- 12. If the answer to any one or more of the above questions was "yes" then please fully explain each such "yes" answer, by number, on the reverse side of this questionnaire.
Attoch odditional sheets to provide further information, if necessary.
Sipature
- Subsidiaries of Texas Utilities Company are Texas Utilities Electric Company, which hcs four divisions: Texas Power & Light Company, Texas Electric Service Company,
%Ilas Power & Light Company, and Texas Utilities Generating Company; Texas bilities Mini Company; Texas Utilities Fuel Company; Basic Resources Inc.; and Choco Energy y.
TN-85-6262/15 D-l l -. . , - =-______.-
9 ATTACHMENT D (Continusc0 STATEMENT REGARDING PAST ACTIVITES OF TERA CORPORATKIN APO ITS SLBSDIARES WITH TUGCO APO ITS AFFLIATES 1
TERA Corporation's CST octivities are being performed by TENERA Corporo-tion, the Company's nuclear services division. In fiscal year 1982, this division performed services for TUGCO's Operations Department with associated revenues of less than i percent of the nuclear division's total annual revenue. This contract was TEtERA's only contract with TUGCO or its offiliates with the exception of the existing contract associated with the Company's CPRT role.
l
! TERA Corporation, the parent company, has had prior contracts with TUGCO and
!1s offiliates in the creas of automated records manogement, computer cmd .
environmental services. For each of the last five fiscal years these revenues have represented less than 10 percent of TERA's total revenues. TERA Corporation has not been involved in any nuclear safety-related work octivities for Texas Utilities.
TN-85-6262/15 D-2
ATTACHMENT E REGEST FOR EVALUATK)N OF NSPECTOR QUALFICATION RECORDS TO: Evoluotion Research Corporation Date:
Attention: Mr. J. Young -
FROM: J. R. Honekamp TERA - TRT lasues Mgr.
SUBJECT:
Request for Evoluotion of Inspector Qualification Records The ottoched qualification records for:
(Nome)
~
(Company) ore transmitted for your evaluation. This individual will be performing the following type of work as identified in:
(ISAP No.) ISAP (Section) ucription of type of inspections to be performed:
(issue Coordirutor)
Results of ERC Evoluotion of ottoched inspector qualification records:
Sofisfactory:
(Signature /Date)
Unsatisfoetory:
(Signature /Date)
Comments:
TN-85-6262/IS .
E-l
l ATTACHAENT F
- THIRQ PARTY PERSONEL ROSTER UPDATED AS OF i
Objectivity Resume Form Training RL Recommended Req'd. Reg'd. Specified Approval Nome Position By Comments /
(Y/N) (Y/N) By Memo Date Limitations i
t i
I
'. [
l l
l 1
I i
TN-85-6767/l5 F-l
_ _ -