ML20198J317

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing Changes Administratively for Unit 1 & Increasing Licensed Power for Operation of Unit 2 to 3445 Mwt
ML20198J317
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 12/21/1998
From:
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20198J312 List:
References
NUDOCS 9812300140
Download: ML20198J317 (7)
v • d • e


Text

Attachment 4 to TXX-98265 Page1of3 DEFINITIONS PRIMARY PLANT VENTILATION SYSTEM 1.24 A PRIMARY PLANT VENTILATION SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radiciodine or radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment. Such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents.

PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM 1.25 The PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) shall contain the current formulas, sampling, analyses, tests, and determinations to be made to ensure that processing and packaging of solid radioactive wastes based on demonstrated processing of actual or simulated wet solid westes will be accomplished in such a way as to assure compliance with 10CFR Parts 20,61, and 71, State regulations, burial ground requirements, and other requirements governing the disposal of solid radioactive waste.

P_ URGE - PURGING.

1.26 PURGE or PURGING shall be any controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration or other operating condition, in such a manner thri replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.

QUADRANT POWER TILT RATIO 1.27 QUADRANT POWER TILT RATIO shall be the ratio of the maximum upper half excore detector calibrated output to the average of the upper half excore detector calibrated outputs, or the ratio of the maximum lower half excore detector calibrated output to the average of the lower half excore detector calibrated outputs, whichever is greater. With one excore detector inoperable and power < 75% of RTP, the remaining three detectors shall be used for computing the average. With one excore detector inoperable and power above 75% RTP, the rnovable incore detectors shall be used to determine quadrant power and average power based on the relationship between incere and excore power using the most recent flux maps.

RATED THERMAL POWER 1.28 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3411 MWt for Unit 1 and 3445 MWt for Unit 2.

REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME 1.29 The REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME shall be the time interval from when the monitored pa;ameter exceeds its Trip Setpoint at the channel sensor untilloss of stationary gripper coil voltage.

7EPORTABLE EVENT 1.30 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in 10CFR50.73.

COMANCHE PEAK - UNITS 1 AND 2 1-5 Unit 1 - Amendment No. 36 Unit 2 - Amendment No. 22 9812300140 981221 PDR ADOCK 000004 5 P

_ _ - ______ _ to TXX-98265 Page 2 of 3 TABLE 2.2-1 (Continued)

O REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION TRIP SETPOINTS 9,

r FUNCTIONAL UNIT TRIP SETPOINT ALLOWABLE VALUE mR 8.

Overpower N-16 a;

Unit:1 5112% of RTP*

$114.5% of RTP*

e bl Unit'2 5111% of RTP*

5113.9% of'RTFt c-5 d

9.

Pressurizer Pressure-Low a.

Unit 1 11880 psig 11863.6 psig g

b.

Unit 2 11880 psig 21865.2 psig o

N 10.

Pressurizer Pressure-High a.

Unit 1 52385 psig 52400.8 psig b.

Unit 2 52385 psig 52401.4 psig 11.

Pressurizer Water Level-High 1921 of 193.9% of instrument span instrument span y

h 12.

Reactor Coolant Flow-Low a.

Unit 1 390% of instrument 188.6% of instrument span span b.

Unit 2 190% of instrument 188.8% of instrument span span kk

  • RTP = RATED THERMAL POWER e c+

NH e

a 88 9R 88 e c+

i l to TXX-98265 Page 3 of 3 E7 PLANT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.7.1 TURBINE CYCLE

'3/4.7.1.1

' SAFETY VALVES The OPERABILITY of the main steam line. Code safety valves ensures that the Secondary System pressure will be limited to within 110% (1305 psig) of its design pressure of 1185 psig during the most severe I

anticipated system operational transient.

The maximum relieving capacity is associated with a Turbine trip from 100% RATED THERMAL POWER coincident L

with an' assumed loss of condenser heat sink (i.e., no steam bypass to the i

condenser).

L The specified valve lift settings and relieving capacities are in accordance with the requirements of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. 1974 Edition.

The total rated relieving capacity for L

all valves on all of the steam lines is 18.190.884 lbs/hnfThe which is 120% of the total secondary steam flow of 15.140-MG isT15'140:016 lbs/hr i

fon;Unitjllandil_5' 268',-734Dbs/hCfor; Unit:2 at 100% RATED THERMAL POWER.

STARTUP and/or POWER OPERATION is allowable with safety valves l

inoperable within the limitations of the ACTION requirements on the basis of the reduction in Secondary Coolant System steam flow and THERMAL POWER required by the reduced Reactor Trip settings of the Power Range Neutron Flux channels.

The Reactor Trip Setpoint reductions are derived on the-following bues:

For four loop operation SP

""""" x (109) l i

Where:

SP -

Reduced Reactor Trip Setpoint in percent of RATED THERMAL POWER, V-Maximum number of inoperable safety valves per steam

line, 109 -

Power Range Neutron Flux-High Trip Setpoint.

l l

X-Total relieving capacity of all safety valves per steam i

line in lbs/ hour, and i

Y-Maximum relieving capacity of any one safety valve in L

lbs/ hour l

9 I

i f-1 l'

COMANCHE PEAK UNITS 1 AND 2 B 3/4 7 1 L

l

!s

l.

l l

j l

l ATTACHMENT 5 to TXX-98265 AFFECTED PAGES OF THE ITS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Page 1.1 5 Page 3.3-16 Page B 3.3-56 1

. to TXX-98265 Definitions 1

Prga 1 of 3 1.1 l

1.1 Definitions i

PRESSURE AND The PTLR is the unit specific document that TEMPERATURE LIMITS provides the reactor vessel pressure and l

REPORT (PTLR) temperature limits, including heatup and cooldown I

rates, the power operated relief valve (PORV) lift l

settings and arming temperature associated with the Low i

Temperature Overpressurization Protection (LTOP)

System, for the current reactor vessel fluence period.

l These pressure and temperature limits shall be determined for each fluence period in accordance with l

Specification 5.6.6.

Plant operation within these limits is addressed in individual specifications.

l QUADRANT POWER TILT QPTR shall be the ratio of the maximum upper RATIO (QPTR) excore detector calibrated output to the average of the l

upper excore detector calibrated outputs, or the ratio of the maximum lower excore detector calibrated output to the average of the lower excore detector calibrated outputs, whichever is greater.

RATED THERHAL POWER RTP shall be a total reactor core heat transfer (RTP) rate to the reactor coolant of 3411 HWt for Unit l' and l

3445 HWt-for._ Unit:2.

l REACTOR TRIP The RTS RESPONSE TIME shall be that time interval l

SYSTEM (RTS) RESPONSE from when the monitored parameter exceeds its RTS l

TIME trip setpoint atthe channel sensor until loss of stationary gripper coil voltage.

The response time may be verified by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total steps so that the entire response time is verified.

SHUTDOWN MARGIN (SDH)

SDH shall be the instantaneous amount of reactivity by i

which the reactor is suberitical or would be l

subcritical from its present condition assuming:

a.

All rod cluster control assemblies (RCCAs) are fully inserted except for the single RCCA of l

highest reactivity worth, which is assumed to be fully withdrawn.

With any RCCA not capable of l

being fully inserted, the reactivity worth of the l

RCCA must be accounted for in the determination of l

SDH; and b.

In H0 DES 1 and 2, the fuel and moderator temperatures are changed to the hot zero power temperatures.

1 (continued) o l

COMANCHE PEAK ITS 1.1-5 May 15, 1997

~ Attachment 5 to TXX-98265 RTS Instrumentation Prge 2 of 3 3.3.1 Table 3.3.1 1 (page 2 of 7)

Reactor Trip System Instrumentation APPLICABLE REQUIRE SURVEILLANC MODES OR OTHER D

E SPECIFIED CHANNEL CONDITION REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE FUNCTION CONDITIONS S

S S

' VALUE(')

5. Source Range 2

2 1.J SR 3.3 1.1 s 1.4 E5 Neutron Flux SR 3.3.1,8 cps SR 3.3.1.11 3 , 4 '". S

2 J.K SR 3.3.1.1 s 1.4 E5 SR 3.3.1.7 cps SR 3.3.1.11

6. Over temperature 1.2 4

E SR 3.3.1.1 Refer to N-16 SR 3.3.1.2 Note 1 SR 3.3.1.3 SR 3.3.1.6 SR 3.3.1.7 SR 3.3.1.10

-7.

Overpower 1.2 4

E SR 3.3.1.1 s 114.5%

N 16 SR 3.3.1.2 (Unit;:1).

SR 3.3.1.7 E113.9%

SR 3.3.1.10 (Unit l2)

(continued)

(a) The Allowable Value defines the limiting safety system setting. See the Bases for the l

Trip Setpoints.

i L

(b) With Rod Control System capable of rod withdrawal or all rods not fully inserted.

(e) Below the P 6 (Intermediate Range Neutron Flux) interlock.

d 1

COMANCHE PEAK ITS 3.3 16 May 15, 1997 i

l to TXX-98265 RTS Instrumentation Pags 3 of 3 B 3.3.1 l

BASES l

Table B 3.3.1 1 Reactor Trip System Setpoints Function Trip Setpoint 1.

Manual Reactor Trip N/A 2.a Power Range Neutron Flux, High s 109% RTP 2.b Power Range Neutron Flux. Low s 25% RTP 3.

Power Range Neutron Flux Rate, High Positive s 5% RTP with a time Rate constant 2 2 seconds 4.

Intermediate Range Neutron Flux s 25% RTP 5.

Source Range Neutron Flux s 105 cps 6.

Overtemperature N 16 See Note 1 Table 3.3.1-1 7.

Overpower N-16 s 112% RTP (Unit 1) s 111% RTP'(Unit 2) 8.a Pressurizer Pressure, Low 2 1880 psig 8.b Pressurizer Pressure, High s 2385 psig 9.

Pressurizer Water Level - High s 92% span 10.

Reactor Coolant Flow Low 2 90% of nominal flow 11.

Not Used.

12.

Undervoltage RCPs 2 4830 volts 13.

Underfrequency RCPs 2 57.2 Hz 14.

Steam Generator Water Level - Low-Low 2 25% NR (Unit 1) 2 35.4% NR (Unit 2) 15.

Not Used.

16.

Turbine Trip SG Water Level High - High s 82.47 (Unit 1) s 81.57 (Unit 2) 16.a Low Fluid Oil Pressure 2 59 psig 16.b Turbine Stop Val.te Closure 2 1% open j

17.

SI Input form ESFAS NA l

continued COMANCHE PEAK ITS BASES B 3.3 56 May 15. 1997

a

-' 4: i.' *,, _

g', g '., '.o.: i' *'

.. '.. ' '.. 7 :,' :t i

.s. ' ',...' - '.*z.,.,.*

, c

' J

$lj. y.,g,. ?.. -. ;;,.
*.

(l, q p..,. f,

. ; s. s. s;,.. ^:...,

,'j. c.$,3.......

4 {.k.,,, '

,e.....,~R.'..,...-....*.,.

f

, i,, ksq.,-

?-

_ c.. g.

.i,

. u r-

~,..

F.

?

.,,._.*,.t,..,,

.o:....s.,...k.m...

k.-

.. :g;:<..c..

s...:....

_ I', ' l.,' *

..1 f':

_,i~,, ' *.

O

.. - '.C:,p,._.,.j"%.Q..:?,..,, -l. ]. f' L' ;,Q b.,. ;.';...

".@,Q[,,. e:k. :-l.1

, - r:

,l....[*..

" '.: ',.. '.' o f ;. ' !( :.: j.,s :

6: d...?; p '_'}P._%. ~. /'y '?* ;t '.., j

,.,'b..

f ?:...p y.;; y '..:.?;-) QF, C

'.t :.y ;; ;::

.. - ' '. '. - ~ *"..:!s, 5*y

..}.

.,.m.*y-t...s; Q,_.4,,',....

s,;,

!,y

  • e4

.t.

.,,. F.,s on, A,..-

.n

  • .,.e;..

so t

.s...,

g;,..,..,;

,.:f, }. [I,

s,\\;..,

y

f' d ', ka.* ;:, k _

.A,,,..,,3.:.y.. v,.. ;,.4 C -

,..,e.f.1,..

t

,*;.e 1

r<-

s;..,,

e.

..a

' h*

f*.',*.

,,[

,a...

, ',,*[ ' '. *.,'

s'

, * 'l.''O...Y

%l,' O m'-*,g. -.

.*8-

., _( * ' ',....'

?

'4...s'...b, '. ; ' +,.,N, ;,

a,..- '.c:.:

Ei ', t

>(:Q ll N;.

\\ ' '".

.'E. l.*: ;$,t'9,,lklD,

.. ;. y..,
n.; V,, :*'J. (;sF ;-

l

. ;,.2.' % '.,'.:. u. ' ',. r...;<,.....

+

.r; t.i.*; ; c g, =. ',;

L.:

. r:- gg<@:..;.,;'. :.- g 7

,p.)

,,y,,..s,..f' :: ~,,,.3.,
3., ' < :

-. ?.z: :,. -

,, Q 4.

w,),.*~:

.d a. '.4

. 3. :;

4,. :., p... g 7

....,-.,, _. ;;u '.., - Q)u ;.i.

.g

\\

'_,',,j

.c

-. % ' m,;.

y'.

    • f

.".,g,_.' \\ ;.

,.....';',.,..y,.1

. s u,.. -..,,.;. '

.., 1* ;

    • 1

. * - = ",.

,s...

,p...'....'.r.,*(..-. ,;...,., 4,y.nc.

r.

4 x. ' ' g: f,. i *, :.,..',' y ', (g y.

,;g..

>ky,

,,,e.

+ 5..

8-4 s-',

n....,.

o

? -

  • > _ J';* -

~.; (.;.;,' _L :

r

(....-

y.

,. Q

.l.r,,

, j',* r' :(= y. f. [ h' g...

.', f. : _ _,t i, ;, -

j'

$.f,.,+..,

-S, ~ g.p,. ; n.,. : *,, -.,,.

. 3.

5,

. '_ 't;.

,1,, M f c ': i g.d 'k,........;,tp f j4'.f ' ;, _* e

,5,y*t.,....

c/

..',I.

s..", ' '

.i;.

. *.,.... 4

.kN. b,.. *<,;.

- [s l- : : *.;,.

,%yj,..4

.l.:'..

Ih..m ? - Q, _ ; + '..:. --......,., '..,"+,.,.it f:

..,,.;..,-,s. s ye v

,.....V.,

,<".i- '.,.. '.

,..,t,

,.;,r

...i

..',3L'

,c.

_ r%. g.. :.

j p, _.,, _

a

, ; a :

T

.i -

t*ll, 4

.'gr.'*

.o.-

,,,1,*

w.

l.

,.s,.

,:..,. ; {a,.n....

.n

.iy.,,.,i...

.,.*y...,;....

a.

  • ..;:',, r

' ;,...* s:.; -s'

,,r,',. -.* ;,.: l'.

/

p

,. ;;th W., 's,. '..'..l : *

'.n.

l l

,1' p

1

'f*,

{

,.'r...J

-y,'.-

...s..3

...s.

c.

o

.t.,.,.

c<

-.:..t.. -......,

i. :; *

.. ;,.,..,.., q ;.

,l y;8,,,,

i..;..v_.-

,s a.

,e

,,.,}.'.,* _ J.. l ';..:.. ;, ;..'lc. :.%.. 3 y3,,, _

.9

.-..g.'..

..c..

c

.c.,

p.,

- j s,

3e

... ^....,.,.., *...,

'.,',?.'--l y",.t*..,,.n

. 3. :, _;_ ;,_

+

4 -

._?,.

,,.:.V

.-l..'.

x 3

- 's

,.* - % 1, n '.

..._, ;;.: 4.,,(..

5 : ;,,_..l f;, <

y,,,

',o.

s;

' ',e )..), ';....:

. :j.'

r'

.,I.. ;.'.:}l_ -

^

.2'.

r ?... ',; ;

";. _., j.

s

..' ' 4 : '. -

o y ;

t<

.,.. '. _a,'..".,_,.

y

...e 4

  • -l l' i--

~ '

l l n, ^' S,q: ;._":..:. !, '.,;;. ', %

{

k

..,.,,.,(,., _,...f

, '.-c

.J s.

.l

.,. *.~;...c,....,,.,.,,,'c,,

-Q,...,,,',~..,,'...',..'.,q.',..-

.:. ;..., :g) y g

.s

;
.. 9

..., y +4$.<-

t

,.y s ll, ;.,' f.

U'. * '... '.. -

y

..,~,,... : :. :.y

.,y..-

.. s ;.,. _ ~,% '. u..,.....

, ;;.W s'

' y a

'......!5...

,,an.._......

... yf...,,...

.~::.,, -.-..

s'

, t.

... g e 31

..'.q.._;.....,.';_... "- 4 *

.d.

..c..

e'..

e

.,?.

. ' - ' 4

,. g$;,

,'v,,

v

,1..

...,.4.,e,'

,f,

..',,d* - b',;s :

r

..;..u

. ;.. A, e*

r y.

-3

......:..,.n-

...., -...,s...e..

c..

.,,sv

  • -6

+ i* :

.m : f

...A,.

.,o-. ;, s, i,

,.y_~;..,....,,'.

,....... -..~.,:x.,c L

s".., :....',....

g.....,, n

. :N -e...,..fpy

.~

i:

...i.-;,..... 'e,.

. r C,, '.; ; ;', :

. ;g; _;f.

d 7,. q,.,;y '

,3...

2 3 n-w

~ ,%. ' l;.; Q :_. [ *,,} [* f. ' _e,', l _.. ; _

3,8 a. _,.. a v.

',,,* ?...:... : ;

t

- n n

  • . ~..' )

.Q,, e s-

  • ,].-

.. - l.!. -

1.

.s-

~;,

2

+ ' t.;- >~:2...

.y:

c

...;g,.-

o

,r

,f v..;

c y

..
  • s:..:
  • ,.r g o

q. j ';. _,;,;

m

^- ;.,

7'..._,,,.._',_,,.

(., v ::. 3. - ',' -;;;...

-.? f':.3 ".

4.

=t <

?_.4

...._.t ; V.'; ('l,,

'4.

..v..

. m.,,...'...,_.

, o.

.t*..

s y

'. ~... y. :~.

,..p,-

... ~..,

4.,..

.-?.

.:.~.*.

. g, (..",.

y

,,.,y

.,s'..

f,

' '....'."..e',l,..,f.,'.4,

  • T ~ ' ".:.

'g

...>c.

r,

'.. i b, - i

%),g

.t.*'i,.,F

,;..'...,,..., ',-.. Y a,. '._. i <.

. (,!

,{ '.,

. b;

. '?

r :,.;

E.

',d ic. *' g, M.

e

' ft y

.I

,.,.'.5.

- i'

,. ;l ;-

.I....l.

. '. _ f.,' - '

s..

.s.... s. n. '... -' '.**;; ',,. -

m,,. n. i l....{....a : -

o.

, >,.. -' - ' - :.*;. -- ; :: :,,_- ly.:_ '*,. -

.'.n'(*.

'....,4,,;;...

-.]'...;;

L.

. l -;

4.....i :

.'8 '

.s 9.

o t'.-

' ',. 'y.

  1. ...4

...,..,s.

e-,. ' '.

'c

-...p

,s:..v. 3 s...,

..e

_ _ r

pn ;,4....,.,

...;c g

g c.ca

,3/ %.,* - l,,.. '..,.

in -

,';...M--'..:

s

-,,,.'.j.d 1,.

i,y '. < ; -

.;~ '*. > >.., _ _

,. ey. :.

,3, z.

., u.. '

. C g r;,p ; &. su q., o.,

.p-y

,3-

  • -:..l-

_Y s

s..s.-

f,,.; vq, ;.. ' -.

<r

' :.g.. *.*

    • f;t,
b. :.. *.

.,1,*,..-

. * *?

.. -.;. ;,..;7... -

r;*

.e

... *? : Y ~ _l e.* -..,

h :.'! ' f.

. - l y; 1 b
  • ~

. Y:y. ;

fh fyyl

' l '..

. /,',}lh[ g/'.... fj,

,%. l.v ' ;

...... p,g,[

.,4' y

p:j

/.

Tr' e

,3.:.

t

...s.

.. - ss.p..,, a p:... _ _ -

.4

,y.t n.. '. *. i,

. f;..... -.

's e

.,,j;...,,..

.~!

<.1..:;.. :;,*. -. +...:.. :

a_.,...,.

,.,uv.

. aj..

.... 9 ;p,o...

, ".j. ",... -,,.

'[

-[ p '.1

.. -. ;., 7

.,a.'s.};.

.y

  • M

,. c..,;.

.-..,,.A....r. t. 4 ; -

.. y c

.%. '%...s.,._e.

y,

,r s4

.,,p...'

6 ;...

?

.,., /;.

f c ;...

-e-1 w.j ' l-i 1,?.P. '. '*:: '.

l.,

' : ;.., 4.

  • '.'.s,...,4,m.,...;,..'.-

.4 s

f

. *.A.j

.*e. c7, g

  • '?'4'-...

>}...

.". : ?.E.? +.

.. t::".'

,, e l.

.....'r. T:).R v '..

'33

- l.f ', , ' g

1..f' l' :

.A

~.

f.:.. : ;c:; ;j.. I

. <. ::..u lv pl.. w;. : a..;J.: 7.,.. Q & {.*:[ {..., ';,, *

'e'* ' ' '.-

~

'.'.*l y,*,.,'

_.ll..'f)*;.'..

,j._

)>

,'.[ '_, l'.,'-

.... '. l

~

I

? : 9... :., :4.

.g..

y :' y. 3 ;.- * :,,

.,x.,.....,t,:..;.a 9

.y. 4.

s.... - -

.u..

,.,. A 3. ; :....

.p

<,., v.

,..s

-.-.....:.4.

.:c,..

?

, i. ; a,...

. ;.,~,.. : y. *.

f._

. i'g 4,..,g*,...?

v;....,..

...,.~,..._.;;

v s.>. s. 7.,. n... -

p, :,s, q.r.^y ;. -

1..

a.'- 4._

y y_

s

.-n2
."

.M h !.';. A f.:,%p.,

s.

<^

.,v.

., -'... '..:s -

v..

e:;. :

'.' '..>l N)**ll; a

..l : : _. '!,

U

,Q. kl,.. 'D..a.

  • L._.&

9;;;,'f;,, s.p*.:::[..> M.,.e i'.

...,Q '.N.h,.c.

..;.... J., *< !..

5 r.

2^,: n,

,. ; ;.1 i:.! ~

^

? 'q -.

e,

....c. ;.; ;f,.,.,; n...'.

~

.-.. g y.... :

a.

.v

_. ; : w =...f,.:.....,re.

q...:

.e s

r r

n'.

.~..:.'..

.. Y t.<%m;.:

s': ;;'.c _. '.,

i.,.

q

,... ; g.,.,,:p,J. '.t :.',, ; ;,,

. : yfg 4~., '.

{,, c. -t

. d.:p} _ 'a[....

. ;., e_.:.,, ;.

..s.,

..3...,..".'c_

y-

_c

_ L,:. ;..,.,.,. = -. r

. : -l.-

e.t c.: 2,.,q....

,y r ;,..v,..

g..,,...........,.

c t'

a h..,....pr.... - -

c ;c.o. -

s.,

.c..

  • b......._.,..,..s s.9 :

.c.,... >

'g q -.

3 r <...

. ',m_...,. p g... '1 :...,.f

...., s,m,,;,,, s,

.s-..... -

c.e ;.. :

o
: e.,

'.,s.., ?

. -l., > a.

.s'..- :....-3 l.;~

..4~

~. ):.,.

.s.,

..vy

..,.e.... 'i,.
m.. :

.t,..'n 3l.

.s.y ' s

  • . ?.y

',;.:y;. :

.;.:n...,,..A...;. o..;

g;....'n..',,,...... > ~ > -

.v. s... + >. ?v...

M_,..>

v.

.s'...*,,'....,.

.s. '... '.

',..a. 9:., q%.. f,.., -

s a :

rc

-..v.c.'..

- q...

s.

y t

>.....l... <.*'..s.

~'.

... u 4
.',' s... A

'.m;.

  • . * :.. q; **

,.~..':..<

, ' ',,.:.. ';; a ?

s s.:

q v.:">.

.-.. ~ - :

i.-....

Y.

r-

.:.'. \\,M> ij; ^6. t.%'.^ e l-.c.%. :.\\g.s.

c.. 61. !.?

c..

. 's.. :. '.W. ; %. ',...,

; l " G.',.'. %. :
  • fl j:; h: *., :.;.... ~. ',

?

.'.L.'~'.g,.*..... ^.:, %.

,l

+ n.
,...'. : -

....j.

..,c. 7...f

,.y

.,-'=.

s,

..y,--*

,.;w- {. J.p?.

.1..,,,*,

s q

, 9

,'. ;r.r,g 4.,

e.

i.= l s *.'.::

[. q, ;:.:f. '.*;.s i _. ?,: "Q,',. '.. l '. i -'.; *a.,* :,. ;..,. ' > _-

g ;.%,

r-

., ~

G

,.. _.{ j 1.. -'l.i

.- R..b n'.,' r.'*,*;

,';.. l:

. ?;.. ; : <

V..

g-

-.. :, e

[ ;..' \\ ',). ^::.lf.

',.}'.ll.-l._;j::{.l.[ *'f.:.% *f:.f.]j. } pl,IQ } ':f.[,.Q.

3.;f. ::.:) l.;2.;'

. :?,

  • f t.,,

4 'f'j:::,

_. j..

q.,.._,n..

?:

y.

\\

^

hs Y.). '.'".;lg. 'T_v:.Y !.

tN.. IV.:: *4 ^'lq. '. A.\\.! '.;.,,,?. Q { s '.'..* U, " ': ;

',:~. g.*l.fg ?, :,.

,,, ;.1..4. '..' ;......".
<i'l'*

y* * % l4

r.;$ ;;.
:r*,'if l.Yj'.', f." ' 's;',},n;m?,*y.; -.. Ull:@;'.~r -. 0.K;;. h:: r ff..
',L. ..-ll*y.:.l L 5.-

a -

f*.*

  • e..

'.t a:,._,...0 *..

v,

t

....:m

&: n :.',. ;.v..c 1., r.'.:;;v't. '.

. g*-

,,f

.f.-

,; '" ^ ,

' A.T*

wl,y':].(:

^ ' ' '

) :

s

.'l

.'}..

l

.n' v,;).r. n..,, jr,,y sl:6f*; ' 4. ' }w;.~.v..-

j

%. ;.v.,. J., g.:

- y. e.g% W:m.*

v

.. u; ;;; ~.;1. ' '..

t.

,. +

e

.r,-

. f,..

9 - '

  • <,. :, i. :

",l,..',:

.- ~ l. <.g, e;. :' :

r;

" g. ; ;.

s a

4

.; R..

,e6, _"

  • t;",>..l.

g..r

-y.* u,

4..'j ';:.. q. e*;'...

p.,",,. !.T ;..

^~-

^

t <:'.. p..-

'.. q -, ;;.

6_..

,. :;..,.-.. '.... 3,;.... f f* *.'. '...',9, ' 7 '.'l l ;'l,....,,ll. '. _,.li t.?l' '.

E', ^.

  • ..v,.;f.. ( ' 1' :b, :f.c,,e ;

c,.., 9. ' i 4 p: 'PM.9.] f. !::k p, pig'... ;%

.',l, ).&l. '

. ~.

. r

-f,

.. *x. ;' '.

.;;r ;p g.,

1

....,g.';'Q Ij;[g,($jfJ 7 1.j.

?,'. ^ :

< i

-y i.. '.*.

A.'

o,

. (. r.. :..,..

lt.-

_ *; g -

, j j.. % b, _lg,. c-

..n.
;. c..

p,,

/

, ';.;.; _; p. q n 's..

<4-l;, ::,.g ;.; y. ; *;h.;,, ;.. g; f... yl.

c,

r..,',s..
-:.... 9g... '. : :,,.s.,s :,... :;4}:

>r.

..... '. - : ?., ;....,,:

y.,.. g,.,.;3

, y......y, ;.y.;

);,

,tj. 7; ;,._.. ; ;;;,

c. ;,_...

.s<..

y,-f..

. ;, y,. :,

,.g,;,,q ;gpj,, ~...

z. > q _ _ y y c - -

.s

- }O. 5:',. '. -..-:.:

,., g. v. : _, _._..

e j;

.,,j:...a

... Q..

..- *.e,

s

.~

n,%3.,. :

s:

,.., 'y ;y

...ya.:..

A

. ;. : y,,. g,:a.,n -. %

3.., s.....,.r;:

-_as w, s: : s.-. s,'

., s

.c,..

r.

.;c.

se:;

,.. +<-

r:..,..-

__.,.;l.:.,.. _. ~..,..n..'. :.g c 7

.c v9,,.c., y... e..[.; s.l; a y,, y'q*[.,.;y:,

, _ /

a L*::.a e. ;

ap :...':

  • r. 5 -

1.n.-...:n.;.

.er. 's. * :,..

,'..[.s-ilea.f ': ;.;;,; ,y _ i:; ;..in,,;..;r [. i ', _y,q.. pe ' :os. f.% :;l::;,'. ; i :c '

e, s

. A.. ;,* l...J..,.g -* s..t 'g -;,c.3.

  • c.f.

..n.d'...

. n JQ.,,b, e d.Qc'.o

'... ;s pp' :.,;.k.::v.,:<,,.; *..'.'.

l+

-...v, i, i, 4y

-. h. ". ' ;g,. M,,.'.. :..i *. i ~ s

*;.. Y y '.g,'.," ';'

.v.

,,c.,.,

.t

/

..,*s,.-.'; ; ~'. -. '.a,..:... <.. -. -

vt

.'--&...'.'.~...s.,,

V,J > s't

, R ;,.;. ',t,.. ', ',.:.,. },'.'. '; P.J '..,. * $, '.:,:..%..\\'..;,;.-,,,3*.'-

.g-Q:...,'a-'..'..'

? -..

s

...a.. a t... '.

,=. : -.
  • 3.v*

-";W',**.,

6 4 \\

..l.

- -. p, :.

5.',

3.f., g :. ' f.; M..4. " ~"r;; t,;y, '., -7',, i..., g.,'.;.sy{:

s-h..:- ' x }'. s. ', '. '.

,r r.

i.

i

' 8;. -

s

. '.,. y.,;

l[ ~-l4.

.fp-c.,.

t

.c'....

s

.....,s-e.

-.*92. ; 4...

.s'. ~.; ce

.._.;.,r.

..~...g.-

1. '%.., :y. ;.p :.g e q, :; ;_

,?..'j ~s

'- 'i '

t....*...s..,

  • s 9.. :,

% g;1.:... -

e-s,

.w.

s

'$...,.s./..,)'e,...., :

  • . f. ;.q.t. 3

. t. s \\..,,... n, ?,

n.

3,

-:4 ;;....,...:s.

c

.-fw,

.!.):.

e.'..,,*-d.v..

r,s t

..- vs

,s

', *. ;,' g Q.. '

':'.&:. q.,:,. s,,;.,..'

c.'

2 -

,o,-

..',',..~. l. ~.. ' :.. }' T :;; :. ;,'. ; ; *. <.j[it ' ', ',,'. ;< a3 *,, f J'.*.

l...

- ),,,..', q:,}r l ( 1

.,-n:

y..

c

,4-

.s c r ~.

.,p s '

e

',. V'. f,.

..... '.' :[..;,._.

  • ., y.

.,3 ; ':,n ;'* ;;.. *- [ t l,,,. y., ;; g. )_* g. '1:; j%.T, ?

}
;p.,;t g,, 7. '.': f,*, i.,: 'b. ',Z.<.?.;. p g,: f.j..,,. ??:
  • _*. f,;

..,,',w

. - e....l;h

$. '. ? ? q$l'.,..

E.

^

('f'..

a_

4 s.

... ~-,.

,.. \\[

!'0_;?,^<

.l.'

^ h, '

.',1

.'..l E ',,.,

l

. l

~. *

  • _ "j..

'A, 7. g* og,.,-.._

': y.p.;'l[4. f. ( sh}Q. 7.. 5

,y

.a, t -

-l-

.. ;.. ::..;..a : r,,;,

g,j;;: ' S_';}'. _. Q{;4. S' j. g,$;Qin; g,.;, ;Q, Q;.k,.,

'.y

.T.. arc

,. ;;j

.c.,..

3 g;;p.QA,.. p{,?lJ f:ge),1, I%d.;:

, e 'y}.,h. fl;._::.z.':;

'.. :y :,.2, ;..,d j, ;.y.};.; 'f

). s l:

y, j:f.

,. f n,r. ^2. i, ;y;x%,., {*'o ':^

,o',

, W.

Ql..;; Q.., '.,, a-

. -[t kt

'sp',._

~

a"

~.. d r

-.,,.q :y; -

j. -

y.

,. w$.3.

!..,. vf

. a.:H"..f

,e

. _,. n..,)., y:-

< 9y y.r.,.. ;;,

,9.

.s

_.,;.., * : y: q..

..i

.' g.,. s. s,> n,..

..g 1.

s._...

e p. *o

.c,....e....-

w

,e e* ;

. y

.s..

y.p '.;; p

.sr.....,,.y.,;...-.. x i., n 5
,..a ; y

,\\,6'..,,-

' f,h ' c.s y n

..a ;> s....r','...3,...

s.....

.:. J.

...s

,'. 1.:, _

l..p,,..,t \\.,..

3

~

.s

.~;

.r

.. :q_.1 '.* ) $'

  • 2;fl Qi _;,f..... v

., e

.....c.

. 9..g&_. y..

v.

m a

j.19.;-

',i 2
...:' : '. :g. 9.-.,. ".

O'*?:.Q lll y. 3

, w..u t

s

.p ;. J. a y-*.

.y.,...lfo;* $, 9 ;

(.-

J.fO'i.Ol")}p. f. ',

. '._ -,,'..';-. ' i {.*
l '.. b ', :'., l,. ;ll 'l~l*

I ~':,;'"\\ W:.. ; s;,; *....f.l,g f

l'qf jG

);

..:l % '., '.

f..,. M.,.,a:. A..:.e.: '. ;;; ;W.,.. ; A

. W. ;,, r 4:

a

  • p..,

A 4..,'. ;~ ; ' *,' f :..c,,-

.f $k.$h,j,.'.

..c p.'4.y

.,.1.,

,9, sk.

i.

a -

v...,s,.s.i.

. e' S s ',,* y sT, a 1s,-

. +-

.L.,.

  • .p'.

,a 1... s'.,..,;..., ',

p b..

1..

.I,'Q,..

s..:.,...

.U.

)t* >4l:~j.,T, e '. n.

f,..: ;.

.Y. *,

1.

F, ';.',? s.' : ' '.

,., ',..,.,.,,, i'

?

f...

^ +

.-r-. f..y p-

.y':.%

1

.gv':,

g

. - y* ';

G...hff'g'rg.a c:.*:

Qf.. @'.a,:' g..v -

.. b >.t;;

  • ..%. lj%.> '

. J..S..' p ".

,l,d?.L: J.f..m. t.'Qh,.yll f. %.hf,.1-e :-

.s f.y.l},f:e$f[.f.f:g$ L}y,.w{i &n.g;4 TWv.c !.}a.':j.y;;_: ;. p. +..se,.,f. 9..

u., :.... y ; p,>.. :- :..s.. g..,.... y m.,.:. m?.,g..a;l; c.

p

.& mgs. s., _

-.i. y. ;+,.

.a ps/ g.v.c

, s

s.../g

..s.

j-y.&wy ('..

.,.w

. e.:...

v... :s. r

_,i. y ;;.,;_. l
; ; ;;_ ' p: s j..g,..;. (,.y G _Q:?_'};.j,.;. :rg."y;t c.: 'f; c.. ~ r.:}ny.f{x :

g;}g,2-l; 1

s n>j'.Q:!p:..., 5gim (s Ql,.

7 f

4,,;.,

,, 3. 7;,y,m.,g x.,4..,_;

...p,,_.,. w. :..,::,.. p:. 7

.....p y..., w.

..^ \\ ' [:i., ;.b.

..c

., ;.,. c.

r.

. -. g.

n;,

^

..w _

g

. n.c w

_ }g.'.

  • l

.[(,

.f.i gf.

.. _ ' [. y_[,.[ % [".)

( } '..*;;;,..l

^[

a. '.

u.s;c H;

tv c ;-

J++ j i t, r

+z u.g m. a y; p j,. g ;.;p c

.; 4 r

s

' _ // }

f'f']

i 4

h y%n....

o 1

s i

e Wspu u,

"n iWestirighouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

.x f'

J e.

' = 'p,

['.

1 b

N.'

,,-A

ih ? ?z\\

k

+ ~

r, J

~

2 h

5 vi

-b,a y,

n.).!

jY..

'~: l '

,k w

m

- sc

,i,[,

My.#.M 4 p _. +-

iN'

^ #

2

>y,.~

@M svp6,.,.....,

.,., g -

WC AP;102.63 -

4 y

v s d.h'f.

, ~.

~..

Y

' ~

l ; "

a k

f,

j

^k 1

y-u;

.c s

+ > ;

,1 e

w 9,

- a tp

(y,,0 t '

f f3.

e q

,'t

^

k

.,di, n

,,-.r.

L 1

i

' e x 6 l' Q' Q<.D'I"f';;'

f'.,

..;y i

.g

._+..I r

.a

,4 j

M ff

%^. 1 _

,{

5._.s. o:

&..:s gl j~, &m n,,,N, e>7

= w w.,.,

a s

3 n

~;

w'

/

N:

ll;*

m

.'(...

{

~..

/

b I

V un' - : >

.a.,

<#r. '

"c-j

.ff#

- ge

+

q 4

y.

. p" f..

'n.

.e M."

l

+

, / ^

4ia AJUPRATINGTH%g,....

s -

s y

.g

+

. E h.

LICNNSED POWER 7 I

~

~

vn

%.w; w. 4w. n,.

~

e n

l

t s. ;-c.a y M>.

~

nuq-,

w

.m c -<

biOFM,.g'.,P'RESSDRIZED% WATER?

,I o

e J...

e.s 2

,L.,

s

'Q h es..

. a.'

..e,T

'.1

^

U..

"g..

n.,
q. ' < *' ;

N,

' ?l,,

6 Nl

,a

O-

.?

^

Ja

.e

~

ty 3_,.

i-""

4 myw4REA_CTOR POWERLPLANTH~

i Y,s p

p

', '/

s t

s.)

t h'Q(p r.f'l

4 2.,

,}.l:,

e'

'cn t

(

1 e

.a

_,-: g(. -. -,,

[f'

'.g

} ;;

, ', ~

.~

s

~

'~.

6

.A 2 5, 4 5

m n

x "4

M,[.

r i

1, N1 TVs

?

l,.

yg

q. '

t

7;.

y y,

e-

u

. se c

:m

. r; o

i -[ y-- [ ; ~ i e

p

?M',

e

+

I jf. q. 4 g

g N

g

~

&n 3

, m n,.

n

+

> : f: o. ;

g j: s y -'

t t

u_<

q

,4->

m s

r a

! [','

pg' Q.C

    • 1 l
. t 4

s 4

y l.j.O.

m, '

  • m. ~m: ; y s

' 3 g'.j 3.U t

A a

I b

7 I

w n,;, s m

, i.t ?.; i.Wie;

' y [' ' ' "g./ /Jk!['

1 w

k%'7[

.gl d

.s, c

,i f.

y:.

n%

(Q:

.,',-f VV e.-

fI v.

l.

3 s c r $.'n.,

2,

+.

m~,,, W;,. 3e s't ilnigio'u s:,e :E n e r g y 'S y s t e m s.

4.-

K

'$ ;. [;

4

. f in ! ? ;

i f5 _.l'( > i.

r n

.x gj(

t

,4 e

I

W';J: urn ~

, f 'b ')'

{

4' Q.k 3

'h

'Q

'h Qff *'

_73

, b ", Z[, M, y

3

l l

l ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 WCAP-10263 l

l l

A REVIEW PLAN FOR UPRATING THE LICENSED POWER OF A PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR POWER PLANT R. H. McFetridge R. T. Marchase R. H. Faas JANUARY,1983

.b :

Approved:

Approved:

K. J W uschi, Manager E. P.

Rahe, i ger Systems Engineering Nuclear Safe l

Westinghouse Electric Corporation l

l Nuclear Energy Systems P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh. PA 15230

l' ABSTRACT This report defines a review plan for increasing the licensed power rating of a nuclear plant.

It describes the evaluations required to support an uprating application for a typical plant, and proposes a l

basis for setting the ground rules and criteria for performing those l

evaluations.

Its purpose is to develop guidelines for licensees to use when applying for increases in their licensed power ratings.

The review plan is based on three propositions fundamental to the l

feasibility of uprating an operating nuclear power plant:

1.

Power related aspects of the plant design will be reviewed.

2.

The licensing criteria and acceptance standards applicable to current plant operation will apply to uprated plant operation.

3.

Analyses required to support an uprating application will be performed using current analytical techniques.

l The NRC must establish its position regarding these issues in order for l

the applicant to provide sufficient and appropriate information in support of an uprating application.

l l

l l

6 33530:1/012783

l TABLE OF CONTENTS l

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

1 1.2 History 1

1.3 Objectives 2

2.0 UPRATING REVIEW PROCESS l

2.1 Ground Rules and Criteria 4

2.1.1 Impact on Current Operating License 2.1.2 Scope of Review 2.1.3 Codes, Standards, and Criteria 2.1.4 Analytical Techniques 2.2 Uprating Review Process 6

2.2.1 Uprating Parameters 2.2.2 Pre-tendering Discussions 2.2.3 Docketing and Approval 2.2.4 Uprating Implementation 3.0 SCOPE OF REVIEW FOR A PLANT UPRATING 3.1 General 8

3.1.1.

Design Limiting Uprating Evaluations 3.2 Detailed NSSS Evaluation 10 3.2.1 General 3.2.2 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) 3.2.3 Chemical and Volume Control System (CVCS) 3.2.4 Residual Heat Removal System (RHRS) 3.2.5 Safety Injection System (SIS) 3.2.6 Boron Themal Regeneration System (BTRS) l 3.3 Balance of Plant Systems and Equipment Evaluations 13 i

3353Q:1/123182

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3.3.1 Typical BOP /NSSS Interfaces 3.4 Accident Analyses 17

4.0 REFERENCES

21 TABLES 1

Comparison of Typical 2 Loop Plant Parameters 22 2

Comparison of Typical 3 Loop Plant Parameters 23 3

Comparison of Typical 4 Loop Plant Parameters 24 l

l 4

Typical Uprating Milestones 25 5

NSSS Components 26 l

6 Summary of Typical Reactor Coolant System Design 27 i

Transients 7

List of Typical Accident Analyses 28 l

l i

l J

l i

I 3353Q:l/123182 l

l

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

Due to the increasing lead time and the rising capital cost of new power plant construction, there has been a major tmnd by electric utilities to upgrade and uprate their existing generating plants.

Increasing the number of kilowatt hours generated by an existing unit is a cost effec-tive way to add generating capacity that benefits both the utility and its customers. Most of the uprating effort to date has been concen-trated on fossil fueled plants. Although there is a growing interest in uprating nuclear plants as well, many utilities have hesitated to pursue that option because the regulatory review and approval process is not clear at present.

The impact of an uprating application on the current plant operating license, the criteria that will be apolied by regulatory authorities in their review of an uprating application, and the time i

required to complete the review process am all critical factors in detemining if it is feasible to uprate a nuclear plant.

1.2 HISTORY Thermal power uprating of nuclear facilities is not a new concept.

During the 1960's and early 1970's a number of utilities and NSSS sup-pliers recognized the potential for uprating the thermal output of the nuclear unit to increase electrical generation.

Conservatism was designed into the original plant systems and equipment with the under-standing that increased themal power ratings would be requested at a later date based on the levels of safety and operability demonstrated by the plant at the originally licensed power. The Robert E. Ginna and H.

B. Robinson II nuclear units are examples of Westinghouse plants uprated after the initial operating license was granted.

Ginna was operated at a rating of 1320 MWt until an amendment to increase the licensed rating to 1520 MWt was approved. H. b. Robinson II was originally operated at 2200 MWt until a themal power uprating to 2300 MWt was approved.

Later plants have been uprated before initial power generation. The D. C.

3353Q:l/123182 1

Cook Unit II, for example, was uprated from 3250 MWt to 3403 MWt during licensing of the plant.

Several non-Westinghouse nuclear facilities have also been uprated, including Fort Calhoun, St. Lucie I, Crystal River, and Millstone II.

Today there is a broad base of experience to support the operation of plant components at uprated levels.

In an effort to streamline and standardize the licensing review process, nuclear suppliers have standardized plant, component and system designs to envelope a spectrum of operating conditions over a broad range of themal power ratings.

Tables 1 through 3 show the progression of Westinghouse NSSS ratings with time for 2, 3 and 4 loop plants with an active fuel length of 12 feet.

From the tables it can be seen that over the years themal power has increased by approximately 30 percent.

During this period, many of the standard NSSS components have been licensed and operated at power levels beyond those of their initial application.

It is also significant that the safety related features of a Westinghouse PWR are typically designed for a themal power rating about five percent greater than the licensed rating.

This power rating is referred to as the Engineered Safeguards Design Rating (ESDR), and it is usually detemined by the turbine limiting flow capability. As a result of this practice, many of the Westinghouse pressurized water reactors operating today could be uprated to the ESDR with only minor software and hardware modifications. With appropriate modifications to the NSSS and to the BOP, some of these units could be uprated beyond the ESDR.

1.3 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this report is to develop guidelines for licensees to use when preparing applications for increases in their licensed power levels.

It consists of two principal elements.

One describes the safety "aluations and component design reviews that will be performed to demonstrate that a plant can continue to be operated without undue risk to the health and safety of the public if the licensed power level is increased as requested. The other proposes a 3353Q:1/012783 2

l

i set of ground rules and criteria that provide a uniform and well-defined base from which to evaluate changes in power rating.

It is hoped that, through review of this report and discussions that follow, the NRC will establish:

1) A position regarding the infonmation required to penmit the staff to conclude its review of an uprating application; and
2) A basis for defining the ground rules and criteria that will be used in evaluating that application.

e

'3353Q:1/123182 3

2.0 UPRATING REVIEW PROCESS 2.1 GROUND RULES AND CRITERIA In order to prepare an uprating application for submittal to the NRC, a licensee must be able to establish:

1.

The potential impact of the uprating application on the current design basis 2.

Scope of regulatory authority review 3.

Applicable regulatory codes, standards and criteria 4.

Analytical techniques to be utilized The NRC position regarding these issues will have a major impact on the feasibility of uprating nuclear facilities.

It will also facilitate the review process if the applicant is able to provide sufficient and appro-priate information to support the initial uprating application.

Follow-ing is a discussion of the Westinghouse position on these issues.

2.1.1 IMPACT ON CURRENT DESIGN BASIS The proposed uprating will be analyzed in accordance with the codes and standards applicable to the plant at the time of submittal and, as such, will have no impact on the plant design basis.

2.1. 2 SCOPE OF REVIEW The scope of regulatory review should encompass all aspects of the faci-lity design and operation which are impacted by the proposed uprating.

Any aspect of the design that is impacted will be evaluated against the current codes and regulations applicable to the plant.

However, a review will be made as defined in 10CFR50.59 to identify any potential 3353Q:1/123182 4

- unrevicwed safety questions that might result from the uprating.

Section 3 of this report provides a discussion of the scope of a typical uprating review.

2.1. 3 CODES, STANDARDS, CRITERIA The proposed uprating will be perfomed in accordance with the established licensing criteria and standards which apply to the current operating license of the specific plant being uprated.

If the uprating involves a potentially unreviewed safety question, it will be identified and resolved during the uprating review process. This process will assure that protection of the public health and safety can be maintained within the current licensing basis.

The need for plant modifications associated with the uprating will be established by the results of component design reviews and analytical evaluations based on operating conditions at the uprated power.

These reviews and evaluations will be used to identify any areas where exist-ing plant components and designs fail to meet appli::able licensing criteria and standards at the uprated power, as well as to detemine appropriate modifications to re-establish compliance. The types of modifications which might be required to support a plant uprating are judged not to be " material alterations" under 10CFR50.91 because they would not change the plant operations or purpose as originally licensed.

2.1. 4 ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES The technology and data base of the nuclear industry have progressed significantly in many areas. To take advantage of that progress, current analytical techniques will be used for any analyses required to support an uprating. This will also facilitate performance of the analyses and the regulatory review of the results.

Existing analyses will not be redone if they are not affected by the uprating, or if they have already been analyzed at the uprated power for the FSAR.

3353Q:1/012783 5

. _ _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _._ _ _ _. _ _. _.

2.2 UPRATING REVIEW PROCESS 1

i Table 4 summarizes the major milestones that must be accomplished during L

review and approval of a typical uprating. These milestones are l

' applicable to upratings in general, and can be modified easily to suit

. the specific requirements of a particular uprating application. A discussion of the more significant interface activities in the uprating process follows.

2.2.1 UPRATING PARAMETERS l

l l

The initial step in an uprating program is for the utility to establish uprating parameters and to define an associated plant configuration for l

the evaluation of limiting plant transients and accidents. This evalua-tion is performed to confirm that compliance with the established plant licensing basis will be maintained with the proposed uprated parameters l

and plant configuration. Based on the results of this evaluation, the j

utility determines the feasibility of proceeding with the uprating program.

l 2.2.2 PRE-TENDERING DISCUSSIONS I

l The utility will initiate pre-tendering discussions to inform the NRC of the impending uprating application, and to describe the proposed uprat-ing program. This will pemit the commission to plan and schedule the uprating review, and to provide comment on the utility uprating pro-gram.

It is assumed that the NRC will have previously provided guidance j

on the program content through its comment on this report. Based on l

these pre-tendering discussions, the utility decides whether or not to l-make a final commitment to the uprating program.

The utility, NSSS supplier, and architect engineer will then meet with the NRC in a technical review of the evaluation and analysis of limiting transients and accidents.

Results of this discussion are documented to l

V 33530:1/012783 6

'the NRC for information, informal review and schedule planning. Follow-ing this meeting, the NRC responds with a schedular comitment, and identifies any technical constraints that could inhibit licensing of the i

uprated conditions.

2.2.3 DOCKETING AND APPROVAL Based on consnents from the NRC, the remainder of the uprating program is executed (e.g., evaluations, analyses and hardware modifications). A final licensing document is submitted containing all required analyses and evaluations and describing any required plant modifications to demonstrate that compliance with the established licensing criteria is maintained. This document is docketed, and forms the basis for final NRC review and approval of the uprating.

2.2.4 UPRATING IWLEENTATION After the NRC has issued a license amendment for the uprated condi-tions, the utility implements the uprating.

Plant design and operating documents are revised consistent with parameters for the uprated power.

Hardware modifications are completed and verified functional. When these actions are complete, the plant can be operated at the uprated power.

The next periodic updating of the' plant Final Safety Analysis Report required by 10CFR50.71 will incorporate changes resulting from the plant uprating.

3353Q:l/123182 7

~

3.0 SCOPE OF REVIEW FOR A PLANT UPRATING i

3.1 GENERAL The licensing review for a plant uprating is typically perfomed in two parts.

In the first part, design limiting conditions and events are reviewed f

to demonstrate the feasibility of uprating to the desired power.

This infomation is also used as a basis for pre-tendering discussions in which I

feedback from the NRC is obtained to identify any licensing constraints. The review is then completed by perfoming all of the remaining evaluations and analyses required to license the uprating.

3.1.1 DESIGN LIMITING UPRATING EVALUATIONS 4

j Initially, a set of plant parameters will be established as a basis for the uprating evaluations.

These parameters will be established by the utility in conjunction with the NSSS supplier and architect engineer based on a knowledge of replicate plants / systems operating at higher power levels, available system / component margin, potential hardware / system improvements available and limitations of components and systems which would not be practical to replace or modify (e.g., containment or reactor vessel structures).

Key parameters include:

NSSS Power Feedwater Flow Rate Reactor Power Steam Generator Outlet Pressure Core Flow Rate Reactor Vessel Inlet Temperature Reactor Coolant Pump Flow Rate Reactor Vessel Outlet Temperature Steam Flow Rate Steam Generator Feedwater Temperature As the program progresses, these parameters will be used to detemine more detailed plant parameters, such as heat rejection rates to the component cooling water systems, mass and energy release rates, radiation source tems and emergency core cooling system parameters.

Evaluation of the design limiting accidents and transients are perfomed i

next to detemine the adequacy of the existing plant for operation at 3353Q:1/123182 8

uprated conditionso These evaluations will also provide input to define any plant modifications that might be required to satisfy the acceptance criteria.

All analyses will be made to FSAR quality standards using NRC approved calculational techniques so that they need not be re-done during the balance of the uprating evaluations.

Accidents and transients that would be analyzed during this part of a typical plant uprating review include design limiting events for o

DNB Margin o

Reactivity Excursions o

ECCS Capability o

Peak RCS Pressure o

Heatup o

Auxiliary Feedwater System o

Containment Design In parallel with the review of the design limiting accidents and transients, an analysis of the NSSS systems and components will be perfomed to detemine their capability for operation at the uprated power.

These analyses and evaluations will either 1) verify compliance of existing systems and operating procedures with applicable plant design bases and regulatory requirements, or 2) identify those areas where revisions and/or modifications are required. This review will include all of the classical NSSS fluid systems components listed in Table 5, as well as any components provided by the NSSS supplier in optional systems.

The impact of the uprated parameters on functional design requirements and structural integrity of these components will be reviewed.

Typical NSSS operating transients to be considered during this review are listed in Table 6.

Where the uprating requirements are not bounded by current component design, revisions and modifications will be made as necessary to demonstrate compliance with applicable codes and sta:1dards.

335SQ:1/123182 9

The plant technical specifications will be reviewed to identify required revisions to protection setpoints and/or limiting conditions for operation.

3.2 DETAILED NSSS EVALUATION 3.2.1 GENERAL The detailed evaluation will differ from the design limiting evaluation in that it is focused on those specific areas in which the need for further evaluation and possible plant changes has been identified.

When the design limiting eva11ation has indicated that the uprating has an impact on a particular system and/or component, the designer will receive revisions to the design bases and/or functional requirements for the specific system / component and will determine if the installed system / component remains in compliance with the plant specific stan-dards, design criteria, and regulatory requirements for the uprated conditions.

An uprating can increase the operating power level and temperatures of the RCS.

This necessitates the verification that each installed system component and the associated analyses are in compliance with the design codes, standards and criteria for the revised nominal operating condi-tions.

In some instances it will be necessary to revise the documented analyses to account for the increased power level.

Three levels of effort may be necessary to accomplish this review. Each of the three levels is discussed below:

The first level of effort is to identify for which NSSS systems and associated components no change in the original design bases and functional requirements is required. For these components and/or systems, no additional effort is required with respect to the uprating.

3353Q:1/123182 10

The sGeond level of effort is to identify for which NSSS components the uprated conditions are bounded by analyses performed for a generic design or for a plant with the identical systems component at power levels equal to or greater than those associated with the proposed change.

For these cases, an evaluation is provided to document the acceptability of the installed system or component.

The third level of effort is to confirm compliance with the applica-ble design codes, standards and criteria for specific instances where the uprated conditions are not bounded by analyses perfonned for a generic design or for a unit with the identical components at duty ratings equal to or greater than those associated with the proposed change.

In summary, the majority of the NSSS components will be enveloped by either the original analyses for the specific unit or analyses for other plants with identical structures at a higher duty rating. For specific components where additional analyses are necessary, it must be deter-mined if the structures remain in compliance with the design codes, standards and criteria applied to the current license for the specific unit.

Should it be necessary, appropriate action will be taken to assure compliance with the unit's current licensing bases at the uprated condition.

3.2.2 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS)

As a minimum, the impact of the proposed uprating on the functional, operational, and safety related aspects of the RCS will be evaluated and/or analyzed in the following areas:

l Analyses will be performed to determine the pressurizer spray, power l

operated relief and safety valve relief capacity necessary to maintain the original design bases for the increased power level.

The specific l

plant Safety Analysis Report discusses the design bases for that unit.

[

Evaluations will be perfonned to determine tne necessary operating range of the Reactor Coolant System control, protection and measurement l

3353Q:1/123182 11

~ -. -. -

. =.. ~... -. -. -.

- ~ - - _. -.- -..- -.-

instrumentation (e.g., pressure, temperature, flow, level, flux mapping and nuclear power) and the associated systems (e.g., nuclear instrumen-tation, flux mapping, bottom mounted instrumentation and incore thermo-l couple systems) at the increased power level. Any necessary revisions to the current operating ranges or functional requirements will be

[

identified.

3.2.3 CEMICAL AND VOLUE CONTROL SYSTEM (CVCS)

L All functional requirements of the CVCS will be reviewed. The areas l

which are most likely to be impacted by the uprating are:

1.

CVCS heat exchanger heat rejection rates - If the uprating results in an increased RCS cold leg temperature, the heat loads from the CVCS heat exchangers to.the component cooling water system will l

increase.

l l

2.

Components and systems located upstream of the letdown heat L

exchanger - Should the RCS cold leg temperature be increased at the uprated conditions, the uprated functional requirements may not be l

enveloped by the current component design bases.

The capability of the components to perfom at the uprated conditions will be confimed and appropriate modifications made. Should the RCS cold leg temperature be reduced, the existing design bases would bound the uprated condition.

3.2.4 RESIDUAL EAT REMOVAL SYSTEM (RHRS)

A higher power level results in an increase in the amount of decay heat being generated in the core during normal cooldown, refueling operations and accident conditions.

This will result in a higher heat load on the residual heat exchangers during the cooldown and also during the refueling outage.

The increased heat loads will be transferred to the Component Cooling Water System (CCWS) and ultimately to the Service l

Water Cooling System (SWCS).

It will be necessary to evaluate the i'

performance of the RHRS, CCWS and SWCS with the increased heat loads.

)

3353Q:1/011083 12 L

On some plants the RHRS pumps and heat exchangers are an integral part of the Safety Injection System (SIS).

For these plants, the ability of the RHRS to meet the design and functional requirements of the SIS at the uprated conditions will be confimed.

The uprating does not impact the ability of the RHR pumps to transfer water to or from the refueling water storage tank.

l 3.2.5 SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM L

The required volume, duration and heat rejection capability of the safety injection flow in the event of a break is determined based on analytical and empirical models which simulate reactor conditions l

subsequent to the postulated RCS and steam system breaks. As a result of ther,e analyses the system and component requirements necessary to L

demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements at the uprated power level will be established. Should the requirements fall outside the bounds of the installed system, it may be necessary to implement software / hardware modifications, provide revised heat rejection rate data for the CCWS and revise the electrical loading of the SIS equipment on the safeguards electrical systems.

In the event the current SIS provides adequate safety margin, no additional effort would be required.

3.2.6 BORON THERMAL REGENERATION SYSTEM (BTRS)

Evaluations at the uprated conditions will be perfonned to assure that the installed system / component design bases and functional requirements bound the proposed operating conditions.

3.3 BALANCE OF PLANT SYSTEMS AND EQUIPIENT EDLUATIONS I

i Uprating the electrical generation capability of the unit will also have l

an impact on the BOP systems and equipment. As part of the evaluation i

of the NSSS, the NSSS/ BOP interfaces will be reviewed and changes to the interface infonnation will be provided to the utility. The review and 4

I 3353Q:1/123182 13

analyses for the B0P will follow a pattern similar to the NSSS procedure i

as discussed in section 3.2.

Initially the plant conditions and configuration associated with the target uprating and a delineation of the necessary interface data will be identified. A review and analysis of the limiting B0P accidents j

(e.g._ containment pressure and temperature) will be perfomed to confirm that the proposed uprating parameters and associated plant configuration are in compliance with the plant license.

1 Subsequent to the evaluation of the limiting BOP accidents, detailed evaluations of the 80P systems and equipment will be perfomed.

If the uprated system conditions are bounded by existing documentation, no additional effort will be required for that system or the equipment in that system.

If the uprated conditions are not bounded by the current design bases and functional requirements, necessary software / hardware revisions will be identified. Where revisions are identified, further evaluation will be perfonned to detemine if the equipment remains in compliance with the plant's current licensing basis.

If necessary modi-fications to the equipment will be identified to assure compliance with

.the licensing basis is maintained.

3.3.1 TYPICAL BOP /kSSS INTERFACES I

The following B0P/NSSS interfaces may be impacted by the uprating.

These interfaces would only be affected as a result of modifying the design bases and/or functional requirements of another NSSS or BOP system serviced by these BOP areas.

a.

AC and DC Emergency Power Systehis - The plant is equipped with I

both onsite (AC and DC) and offsite (AC) emergency electrical power systems to provide reliable power to the NSSS and BOP safety systems.

Increases in the electrical power requirements of the NSSS essential systems, which result from the uprating will be identified.

l I

i 3353Q:1/123182 14

b.

AC and DC Power Systems - The plant is equipped with electrical l

power systems which supply the NSSS equipment.

Any increased NSSS electrical loads which may be required as a result of the uprating will be identified.

c.

Demineralized Water Makeup Syszem - The purity requirements of the makeup water could be affected by the uprating.

d.

Auxiliary Feedwater System - The Auxiliary Feedwater System supplies feedwater to the secondary side of the steam generators whenever the main feedwater system is not available, in order to i

maintain the steam generator as the principal reactor shutdown heat sink. This system may also function as an alternate to the Main Feedwater System during startup, hot standby and cooldown conditions. The Auxiliary Feedwater System provides core l

cooling during abnomal transients.

1 e.

Mass and Energy Release to the Containment - The mass / energy l

release data will be employed to cetermine the containment pres-sure and temperature environment during the postulated accidents and to detemine the associated loadings on the structures and components within the containment in accordance with the l

licensing basis of the specific unit. Mass and energy release data for the uprated conditions will be provided, l

f.

Spent Fuel Pit Cooling System - The functions of this system are:

1.

Maintain desired water temperature in the spent fuel pit.

l 2.

Maintain chemistry and activity level requirements in spent l

fuel pit water.

l 1

3.

Provide refueling water cleanup and purification capabili-ties.

e 33530:1/012783 15

The increased decay heat rates will be identified to allow evaluation of the ability of the installed spent fuel pit cooling system to maintain acceptable temperatures within the spent fuel pit.

There are no NSSS/B0P interface changes with respect to the other two functions.

g.

Main Steam System - The primary purpose of the steam system is to contain and transport steam from the NSSS steam generators to the main turbine.

The steam system also foms part of the boundary between the radioactive fluid systems and the environ-ment.

The uprating will result in increased steam flow and/or pressure in the main steam system.

h.

Component Cooling Water System (CCWS) - The CCWS is an inter-mediate system between the Reactor Coolant System and the Service Water Cooling Systems (SWCS).

It ensures that leakage of radioactivity from the components being cooled is contained within the plant.

The system typically removes heat from the NSSS and some B0P components. Revised heat rejection rates and/or cooling water flow requirements will be identified.

1 Radiological Source Terms - Radiological Source Terms are used in assessing the radiological consequences of accidents. Any changes identified as a result of uprated parameters will be identified.

k.

Plant Testing - Numerous qualification and performance tests were completed for the initial startup to assure that all systems / components of the B0P and NSSS are in compliance with the design and licensing bases for the unit.

These tests also establish the operating margins of the plant systems.

It will be necessary to verify that the perfomance of any system /

component modifications a;e in coepliance with the requirements 3353Q:1/123182 16

of the uprating and the licensing bases.

The recommended test program for NSSS and interfacing B0P systems would be developed on a plant specific basis, depending upon the magnitude of hardware modifications and the magnitude of the uprating.

3.4 ACCIDENT ANALYSES A reference analysis is nomally established as part of the initial licensing effort as documented in the FSAR.

This is supplemented by reanalyses required for reload fuel or plant equipment or system changes.

For a plant uprating, a safety evaluation is perfonned to confirm the validity of applicable reference analyses.

If the reference analyses do not bound the uprated conditions, reanalysis using currently approved methods and appropriate input parameters will be perfomed.

The Westinghouse Reload Safety Evaluation Methodology (RSEM) report (Ref.1) summarizes the overall process to assess changes.

This report was written primarily for reloads, but the process described is also applicable to upratings.

The uprating evaluation process includes:

1.

A systematic evaluation to detennine a) what parameters utilized in the reference safety evaluation are impacted by a change in plant rating and b) if these new parameters are bounded by the current reference safety evaluation.

2.

A detemination of the effects on the reference safety analysis when a parameter per 1.b above is not bounded.

This determination may require a reanalysis as appropriate.

l The specific steps in this process are the design initialization, design process and safety evaluation.

l The design initialization process involves the collection and review of design basis information to ensure that the uprating safety evaluation i

will be based on the actual fuel and core components in the plant, the i

3353Q:1/123182 17

_ _ _. _. _ ~

actual plant operating history, and any plant system changes associated with the uprating.

The review includes the utility requirements, core design parameters, safety criteria and related constraints, specific operating limitations and past operating history.

The initialization review identifies the objectives, requirements and constraints for the uprated cycle being designed.

'The design process ensures that the utility power and energy require-ments established in the design initialization phase are achieved.

The key safety parameters for the cycle (i.e. uprating and reload para-meters) are then detemined based on the preliminary design.

The safety bases to be met for the uprated core are:

Departure from Nucleate Boiling Design Basis - There will be at least a 95 percent probability that departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) will not occur on the limiting fuel rods during nomal opera-tion, operational transients, or during any transient conditions arising from faults of moderate frequency (Condition I and II events), at a 95 percent confidence level.

In order to meet this basis, the minimum allowable DNB ratio is detemined. This minimum allowable DNBR depends upon the DNB correlation employed in the analysis.

For example, this minimum DNBR was conservatively set at 1.30 for the original W-3 DNB correlation and 1.17 for the WRB-1 DNB correl atton.

Fuel Temperature Design Basis - During modes of operation associated with Condition I and Condition II events, there is at least a 95 percent probability that the peak kw/ft fuel rods will not exceed the UO2 melting temperature, at the 95 percent confidence level.

The melting temperature of UO is taken as 5080*F, unirradiated 2

and decreasing 58'F per 10,000 MWD /MTU. By precluding U02 melting, the fuel geometry is preserved and possible adverse effects of molten UO2 on the cladding are eliminated. To preclude center melting and to provide a basis for overpower protection system set-points a calculated centerline fuel temperature of 4700*F has con-servatively been selected as the overpower limit.

3353Q:l/123182 18

Reactor Coolant System Pressure - Peak RCS pressure is not to exceed 110 percent of the design pressure during Condition I and Condition 11 events.

Loss of Coolant Design Bases (10CFR50.46) - The LOCA design bases incorporates a review of peak cladding temperature, maximum cladding oxidation, maximum hydrogen generation, coolable geometry and long-term cooling.

Compliance with these bases ensures that the margin of safety as defined in the basis of the technical specification has not been reduced (a 10CFR50.59 reqrirement).

These design bases are interpreted as safety limits for the safety evaluation.

The objective of the uprating safety evaluation is to verify compliance with the currently established safety limits for the specific unit with the uprated core and plant system design.

This is accomplished by examining each accident presented in the FSAR or subsequent submittals to the NRC to detemine if the reference analysis remains valid for the uprating. A typical listing of postulated accidents is presented in Table 7.

The specific transients for each plant can be found in the unit's Safety Analysis Report.

For those accidents which are affected by the uprating, an evaluation is perfomed to verify compliance with the applicable safety limits.

In the performance of an uprating safety evaluation, each accident is examined and the bounding values of the key safety parameters which could be affected by the uprating are determined based on the reference analysi s.

These parameters form the basis for determining whether the reference safety analysis remains valid.

For an uprating, values of these safety parameters are detemined for the core during the nuclear, themal and hydraulic, and fuel rod design process.

Each of these para-meters is compared with the reference analysis value to detemine if any parameter is not bounded.

If all of the parameters are bounded, the reference analysis remains valid and no new analysis is needed to verify that the safety limits are not exceeded. Should one or more of the 3353Q:1/123182 19

safety parameters not be bounded, a re-evaluation of the accident is perfomed.

The re-evaluation may be of two types.

If the parameter is only slightly out of bounds, or if the transient is relatively insensitive to that parameter, a simple quantitative evaluation my be made. Al terna-tively, should the deviation be large or be expected to have a more significant or not easily quantifiable effect on the accident, a re-analysis of the accident is performed.

If the accident is re-analyzed, the analysis methods follow standard procedures and will typically employ analytical methods which have been used in previous submittals to the NRC.

These methods are those which have been presented in the FSAR or subsequent submittals to the NRC for that plant, reference SARs such as RESAR, or reports submitted for NRC approval. The re-analyzed acci-dent must continue to meet the appropriate safety limit for that event in order to be considered to have acceptable results.

Accident re-analysis may also be necessary if there are any changes made to the reactor plant systems, either in configuration, performance or setpoints as detemined during the design initialization phase.

Should any plant or system changes affecting safety be incorporated, their impact will be detemined during the evaluation.

Measurements of nuclear and safety related parameters during and after cycle startup serve two purposes. The first is to insure that the measured parameters fall within the limiting values included in the Technical Specifications of the plant.

The second is to confirm the validity of the corresponding design calculations.

For an uprating, as for any other reload, startup physics program will be perfomed to confirm the key safety parameters such as rod worths and moderator temperature coefficients.

The testing will also confirm that the core is properly loaded. The values of all measured parameters are compared to those calculated using the design codes.

33530:1/123182 20

-.~.

. - -.. ~.

4.0 REFERENCES

i 1.-

Bordel'on, F. M. et. al., WCAP-9272 Westin9h use Reload Safety Evalu-ation idethodology i

l t

l l..

t-4 1

l l

3353Q:1/123182 21

TABLE 1 COMPARIS0N OF TYPICAL 2 LOOP PLANT PARAETERS First Second Third Future Gener-Gener-Gener-Gener-ation ation ation ation NSSS Power, MWt 1520 1650 1882 1967 NSSS System Pressure Nominal, psia 2250 2250 2250 2250 Total Core Inlet Thennal Flow Rate, gpm 179,400 178,000 189,000 189,000 Reactor Coolant System Temperature, *F Nominal Reactor Vessel / Core Inlet 552.5 535.5 549.9 553.0 Average Rise in Vessel 57.3 63.6 66.2 68.6 Average in Vessel 581.2 567.3 583.0 587.5 No Load 547 547 557 557 Rated Steam Pressure, psia 821 750 920 920 Major Components Fuel Type 14 x 14 14 x 14 16 x 16 lb x 16 Steam Generator Model 44 51 F

F Reactor Coolant Pump Model/ Horsepower 93/6000 93A/6000 93A/7000 93A/7000 3353Q:1/123182 22

TABLE 2 if l

l l

COMPARIS0N OF TYPICAL 3 LOOP PLANT PARAMETERS L

First Second Third Future Gener-Gener-Gener-Gener-l ation ation ation ation l

NSSS Power, MWt 2208 2441 2785 2910 NSSS System Pressure Nominal, psia 2250 2250 2250 2250 4

j Total Core Inlet Thermal Flow Rate, gpm 268,500 265,500 292,800 278,400 Reactor Coolant System Temperature, 'F i

i l

' Nominal Reactor Vessel / Core Inlet 546.2 543.0 557.0 552.3 l

Average Rise in Vessel 56.1 62.6 62.9 68.9 Average in Vessel 574.2 574.3 588.5 586.8 i

No Load 547 547 557 547 l

Rated Steam Pressure, psia 7 85 785 964 850 l

Major Components -

Fuel Type 15 x 15 15 x 15 17 x 17 17 x 17 Steam Generator Model 44 51 F

F Reactor Coolant Pump Model/ Horsepower 93/6000 93A/6000 93A/7000 93A/7000 I'

i 4

l l

L 3353Q:1/123182 23

. -.... ~. - -

TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF TYPICAL 4 LOOP PLANT PARAMETERS First Second Third Future Gener-Gener-Gener-Gener-ation ation ation ation NSSS Power, MWt 2758 3250 3423 3600 NSSS System Pressure Nominal, psia 2250 2250 2250 2250 Total Core Inlet Themal Flow Rate, gpm 358,800 354,000 354,000 360,000 Reactor Coolant System Temperature, *F Nominal' Reactor Vessel / Core Inlet 543.0 536.3 552.5 547.6 Average Rise in Vessel 53.0 63.0 64.3 66.7 Average in Vessel S69.5 567.8 584.7 580.9 No Load 547 547 557 547 Rated Steam Pressure, psia 776 758 91 0 835 Major Components Fuel Type 15 x 15 15 x 15 17 x 17 17 x 17 Steam Generator Model 44 51 F

F Reactor Coolant Pump Model/ Horsepower 93/6000 93A/6000 93A/6000 93A/6000 l

l 3353Q:1/123182 24

TABLE 4 TYPICAL UPRATING MILESTONES Milestone Est. Time Action (months) i 1.

Select Target Parameters and Plant Configuration 1-2 Utility, A/E and E 2.

Perform Limiting Accident Analyses 4-6 Utility,A/EandE 3.

Infom NRC of Intent to Submit Uprating Application Utility 4.

Prepare and Submit Document Sumarizing Liriting Accident Analyses and Identifying Scope of Implemenation Program 1-2 Utility, A/E and E 5.

Review and Coment on Uprating Program 3-6 NRC 6.

Perfom Remainder of Uprating Evaluations and Implement Hardware Improvements:

Utility, A/E and y Analyses 6-9 Hardware 6-24 7.

Final Review and Approval of Uprating Program 3-6 NRC 8.

Issue operating License Amendment NRC i

t 3353Q:1/123182 25

TABLE 5 NSSS COMP 0ENTS Reactor Vessel Reactor Internals Control Rod Drive Mechanisms Incore Instrumentation Tubing Reactor Coolant Loop Piping Reactor Coolant Loop Isolation Valves Pressurizer Steam Generator Reactor Coolant Pumps Component and Piping Supports Tanks Heat Exchangers Pumps Valves Filters Evaporators Instrumentation Refueling and Fuel Handling Equipment Chillers 3353Q: 1/123182 26

TABLE 6

SUMMARY

OF TYPICAL REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM DESIGN ACCIDENTS AND TPANSIENTS Nonnal Conditions 1.

Heatup and Cooldown at 100*F/hr (pressurizer cooldown 200*F/hr) 2.

Unit Loading and unloading at 5 pen:ent of full power / min 3.

. Step Load Increase and Decrease of 10 Percent of Full Power 4.

Large Step Load Decrease 5.

Steady State Fluctuations Upset Conditions 1.

Loss of Load, without immediate turbine or reactor trip 2.

Loss of Power (blackout with natural circulation in the RCS) 3.

Loss of Flow (partial loss of flow one pump only) 4.

Reactor Trip from Full Power 5.

Operational Basis Earthquake (20 earthquakes of 20 cycles each)

Faulted Conditions 1.

Main Reactor Coolant Pipe Break 2.

Steam Pipe Break 3.

Steam Generator Tube Rupture 4.

Design Basis Earthquake Test Conditions l

1.

Turbine Roll Test 2.

Hydrostatic Test Conditions l

a.

Primary Side b.

Secondary Side c.

Primary Side Leak Test i

3353Q:1/011083 27

TABLE 7 LIST OF TYPICAL ACCIDENT ANALYSES Uncontrolled RCC Assembly Withdrawal 1.

From a subcritical condition 2.

At power RCC Assembly Misalignment Chemical Volume and Control System Malfunction 1.

Dilution during refueling 2.

Dilution during startup 3.

Dilution at power Loss of Reactor Coolent Flow 1.

Flow coast-down 2.

Locked rotor accident Start-up of an Inactive Reactor Coolant Loop Loss of External Electrical Load Loss of Normal Feedwater Excessive Heat Removal Due to Fe6 ater System Malfunction Excessive Load Increase Incident Loss of all A.C. Power to Station Auxiliaries Steam Generator Tube Rupture Rupture of a Steam Pipe Rupture of a Control Rod Drive Mechanism Housing Reactor Coolant System Pipe Rupture 3353Q:1/123182 28

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20198J317&oldid=4098029"