ML20202J060

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to Design Adequacy Program,Qa Program
ML20202J060
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/1986
From:
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J051 List: ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8607170016
Download: ML20202J060 (25)
v • d • e


Text

-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

e DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM m

U Rev Recommended QA Concurrence  ; Approval I I A 0

A .3 1 r &JJJ%

( CBM-TRT issue Monogef I A'/1 6 WP Mpnoger /

mau DAP QA Monoger

' Review Team'Leder nI,ter

' Date l

NO12:r DAPIMonoger (NEJ

' Review Teo'frCeoder OLC%&L' T5M-TRT issdeJAanoger casoss DAP QA Monoger alales

' Date i

I pd l

\

hD0 ADO 00445 A PDR ^

I l O CONTROL LED COPY TN-85-6262 i

e .

TABLE OF CONTENTS Rev.I Section Pooe Cove r S hee t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Tab le o f Con t en t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.0 OR G ANI Z AT I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGR AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.0 DESI G N CONTR OL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.0 PROCURE MENT DOCUMENT CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.0 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DR A W I NG S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 e 6.0 DO CU MENT CONTR OL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7.0 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICE 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8.0 NON-CONFORMING MATERIAL, PARTS, OR C O MP OtE NTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 9.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Il 10.0 Q A R E C OR DS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II I l .0 A U DI TS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II C

TN-85-6262 ii

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM

  • QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM p Revision: 1 1.0 ORGANIZATION l.1 Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) l The CPRT organization and its functional responsibilities are described in Section VI of the CPRT Program Plan. The CPRT is led by a Senior Review j Team which formulates policy and provides overoll direction of CPRT octivities.

The Design Adequacy Review Team Leoder, along with the R' eview Team Leaders for QA/QC; Civil, Structural, Mechanical; Electrical / Instrumentation; and Testing Progroms report to the Senior Review Team. A CPRT Program Director, who also report to the Senior Review Team, is responsible for monitoring the Review Team octivities on doy-to-day basis.

1.2 Desion Adeouocy Review Team The Design Adequacy Review Team has been ossigned the responsibility of implementing the Design Adequacy Program Plon, Appendix A of the CPRT Program Plon, and the ossociated issue or Discipline Specific Action Plans.

TERA Corporation, under the direction of its Design Adequacy Review Team Leader, has been assigned the responsibility for monoging and performing the Design Adequacy Program activities.

, Assisting the Design Adequo;y Review Team Leader is the Design Adequacy Program Monoger, Project Monogement Coordinator, and the Construction Quality Interface Monoger. Reporting to the Design Adequocy Program Monoger are the Project Quality Engineer and the Discipline Coordinators in the following disciplines:

o Civil / Structural o Piping / Supports o Mechonical Systems and Components -

o Electricol, I&C Systems and Components o Programmatic / Generic implications.

TN-85-6262 _

PageIof12

- - . - - ,-___,-,-.,,,-y.____--,,-_,---_yn._,.____-- -.,r- -_w,,,., . . . _ . - . - _ . _ ____ .-.%---_-_-.- _ _ _, __ _ ._ _ _ _ _ ___

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: I p

G The Design Adequacy Review Team organization is shown in Figure 1.

The Design Adequacy organization also includes a Design Adequacy Program Quality Assurance Manager. This position is responsible for ensuring the effective implementation of the Design Adequacy Program Quality Assurance Program. The Quality Assurance Manager will verify effective implementation of the program by conducting audits of Design Adequacy Review Team activities. The Quality Assurance Manager will report the results of his activities to the Design Adequacy Review Team Lecder. This structure provides access to a level of management sufficient to ensure that the quality assurance function con be performed.

The responsibilities of the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader are defineated

/Q in Section Vill of the CPRT Program Plan. Design Adequacy Review Team U Monogers and Coordinators are responsible for assisting the Review Team Leader os directed by the Review Team Leader and as specified in Section II.E of Appendix A to tha CPRT Program Plan and the Design Adequacy Procedures.

The organization chart (Figure 1) also shows the Engineering Manager, Systems Engineering Monoger, and DAP Site Manager. All three of these positions have responsibilities for cost, schedule, and other project monogement functions, but do not have quality assurance responsibilities defined in this program and the DAD procedures.

The Design Adequacy Review Team may ese subcontractors to implement its Quality Assurance Program; however, the Design Adequacy Review Team retains ,

responsibility for implementation of the program, d TN-8S-6262 Page 2 of 12 1

Ff i ,

)

ATTAU IMENT 6 CPRT DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM ORGANIZATION TERA DIRECT REPORTINGl CORPORATE CPRT SENIOR

== = _ INTERFACES 2 MANAGEMENT REVIEW TEAM D. Dovls, President

! I I I

DESIGN ADEQUACY

'. DAP QUALITY PROGRAM, OA/OC REVIEW

! ASSURANCE -- REVIEW TEAM -- TEAM LEADER

} o. m LEADER J. Hansel H. Levin

I I i i PROECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROKCT DESIGN ADEQUACY OUALITY TUCCO DAP COORDINATOR QUALITY - MANAGER SITE QUALITY -- INTERFACE COORDINATOR l ENGINER l D. Timmins ENGIEER F. Dougherty MANAGER S. Karpyok i

A. Garland R. Melton J. Miller

! I '

1 a l g ,u

! l l l r l l ENGIEERING GILBERT / SYSTEMS DMIM NNNO E I DAP SITE "^

MANAGER __ COM LTH ._ MANAGER IMpti T. % DSAP COORDINATOR l MANAGEMENT F. Schofer J. Miller j Vil C. Morsgot E.BM M

! I u IX T. Snyder s 3 X J. Varce j XI D. Brosnin

.g MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL, CIVIL / STRUCTURAL PIPING / SUPPORTS SYSTEMS AND NOTES:

INSTRUMENTATION j DISCIPLIE DISCIPLINE COMPOT NTS AND CONTROL (SEE DSAP Vill) (SEE DSAP IX) DISCIPLIE SYSTEMS AND 1. LINE PROKCT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION, CONTROL.

j (SEE DSAP X) COMPOENTS 2. SEE CPRT PROGRAM PLAN, APP. A Ato DSAPs Vlti, DISCIPLl4 IX, X AND XI FOR MORE DETAIL.

j (SEE DSAP XI)

{

3/3/96 TN-85-6262 Page 3 of 12 i

COMANCl-E PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

, Revision: 1 2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 2.1 Design Adequacy Review Team Ouolity Assurance Program Description The CPRT Program Plon, which was developed under the direction of the Senior Review Team, provides overall direction for oil CPRT octivities. Appendix A of the CPRT Program Plan is the Design Adequacy Program Plan which details the scope of work for Design Adequacy Review Team activities. Appendix C of the CPRT Program Plan contains Discipline Specific Action Plans (DSAPs) which specify how external source issues and self-initiated progrc.ms are to be investigated, evoluoted, ond/or performed by the CPRT Review Teams. This Quality Assurance Program details the quality assurance requirements which will be opplied to the work conducted by the Design Adequacy Review Team. In ordy -to implement the requirements of the CPRT Program Plan and its appindices and this Quality Assurance Program, Design Adequocy Procedures

, (DAPs) have been established. Table I lists the Design Adequacy Proce.dures.

1 The Quality Assurance Program elements applicable to Design Adequacy Review Team activities, as defined in this Quality Assurance Program, are Organization, OA Program, Design Control, Procurement Document Control, instructions, Procedures and Drawings, Document Control, Control of Purchased Material, Equipment and Services, Nonconforming Materials, Ports or Components, Corrective Action, QA Records, and Audits.

Should activities be necessary in the arcos of Inspection, Testing or Measuring, and Test Equipment, appropriate quality assurance will be provided through performance of those activities by CPRT Review Teams or subcontractors with applicable quality assurance programs. Design Adequacy Review Team interfaces with other CPRT Review Teams and subcontractors are defined in Design Adequacy Procedures.

Table 2 is a matrix which cross references each of the opplicable OA Program l elements to sections of this OA Program os well as to the Design Adequacy Procedures that implement the OA Program.

O.I TN-85-6262 Page 4 of 12 i

i

..-_,-,._--,,_-..r-.. . , - - - . - _ , _ , - _ , , , m.m- ,,,n.w.__.,..,_m-,.-- ,,.___,_._,,-.._.-e_

COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: I

)

TABLEI CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM PROCEDLRES Procedure

)

Number Title 1 DAP-1 Preparation and Review of Criteria Lists DAP-2 Documentation and Tracking of issues and Discrepancies DAP-3 Development and Validation of Self-Initiated Review Scope DAP-4 Preparation of Checklists DAP-5 Review of Calculations, Evaluations, and Other Implementing Documents DAP-6 Review of Drawings, Specifications, and Other Design Output Documehts

, DAP-7 Trending and Generic implications Evaluations

% DAP-8 Preparation of Engineering Evoluotions l DAP-9 Preparation of Discipline Specific Results Reports and DAP Collective Evaluation Report DAP-IO Development and Use of DAP Procedures and Discipline Instructions DAP-l l Document Control DAP-12 DAP Interfaces and Communications DAP-I3 Preparation of Calculations DAP-14 Design Adequacy Program Records DAP-15 Training and Qualifications DAP-16 Audits DAP-17 Corrective Action DAP-18* Control of Subcontractor i

DAP-19 Processing and Review of Information between the l Quality of Construction, OA/QC Adequacy Program and Design Adequacy Program DAP-20 Overview of DAP Activities Performed by the CCSES Project or Other External Organizations DAP-21 Homogeneous Design Activity Validation and

Selection of Specific items for Review DAP-22 Preparation of Safety Significance Evaluations
  • To be issued if necessary TN-85-6262 Page 5 of 12 l

l l

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - CESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: !

O)

\g.

TABLE 2 DESIGN ADEQUACY REVIEW TEAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MATRIX OA Program OA Program Design Adequacy Elements Section Procedures (DAPs)

Organization 1.0 DAP-12,19 QA Program 2.0 DAP-15,19 Design Control 3.0 DAP-1, 2, 3, 4, 5 6,7,8,9,I3,22 Procurement Document Cotnrol 4.0 DAP-18 Instructions, Procedure and Drawings 5.0 DAP-4,10 L Document Control 6.0 DAP-lI Control of Purchased Material, Equipment and Services 7.0 DAP-18 Non-Conforming Material, Poris 8.0 DAP-17 or Components Corrective Action 9.0 DAP-17 OA Records 10.0 DAP-14 Audits I!.0 DAP-16 I

O I 1N-eS- 2 2 eoee e of 12 i

l

l

. I COMANCl-E PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: I m

2.2 Indoctrination and Training of Design Adequacy Personnel Overall requirements for CPRT personnel qualifications are contained in Section Vil of the CPRT Progrom Plan. Detailed requirements for the indoctrination and training of Design Adequacy Review Team Personnel are contained in DAP-15, Training and Qualifications. Audit personnel are discussed in Section !I of this OA Plan. Qualifications of personnel other than auditors (excluding clerical and administrative personnel) are reviewed by the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader to verify that education, experience, and qualifications are adequate to perform the assigned tasks.

2.3 Review of Adequacy of the Design Adequacy Review Team Ouolity Assurance Program As discussed in Section iI of this OA Program, periodic oudits of Design Adequacy Review Team activities will be conducted to verify proper implementation of the OA Program. Additional reviews of the OA Program may be conducted by Design Adequocy Review Team Monogement or other CPRT organizations. The results of such reviews shall be considered with respect to their ossessment of OA Program status and adequacy.

2.4 NRC Regulations and Industry Standards This OA Program was developed considering the Quality Assurance Criterio specified in Appendix B to 10CFR50. In addition the following industry standards are considered applicable to this OA Program os discussed in the associated QA Program section:

l Standard QA Plan Section ANSI N45.2.11, Design Control 3 ANSI N45.2.23, Qualifications of II Audit Personnel Other standards, referenced in the standards listed above, are not endorsed unless stated otherwise in this OA Program.

TN-85-6262 Page 7 of 12 i

COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 1 3.0 DESIGN CONTROL The scope of Design Adequocy Review Team activities includes verifying the adequacy of specified elements of the CPSES design. These elements are specified by Discipline Specific Action Plons (DSAPs) developed to oddress design concerns identified by, or through CPRT evoluotion of, External Sources os well as by CPRT Self-initiated design evoluotions.

The Design Adequacy Review Teams design verification activities closely parallel the Design Verification requirements specified in Section 6 of ANSI N45.2.l l, 1974. Design verification activities include the preparation of criterio lists and checklists, review of calculations, evoluotions and inputs, confirmation of oppropriate quality and quality assurance raquirements where specified, and offernate calculations. The design verification activities shall be conducted in occordance with written procedures and by personnel other than those who performed the original design or design verification. Currently, the Review Team does not intend to ur,e qualification testing as a design verification method. Therefore, no DAP hos been developed to control qualification testing.

The results of the design verification activities shall be clearly documented in occordance with procedures. The results will be reviewed by personnel other than those performing the design verification prior to final opproval.

4.0 ' PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL The Design Adequocy Review Team will ensure that oppropriate quality assurance requirements are included in procurement documents for services relating to Design Adequocy Review Team activities or that those services are provided subject to the requirements of this OA Program.

O TN-85-6262 Page 8 of 12

COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TE AM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM

  • QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: I Procurement documents prepared shall be reviewed by the Design Adequacy Program Quality Assurance Monoger. They are also reviewed for proper technical content by the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader or his designated respresentative. The reviews conducted by the Quality Assurance Monoger and the Design Adequacy Review Team Leoder are appropriately documented.

Currently, any contracted services will be performed under the total require-ments of this QA Program. Should it become necessary to contract services controlled under other QA requirements, DAP-18 will be issued to ensure that appropriate QA requirements are specified in procurement documents.

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS Measures have been established to ensure that Design Adequacy Review Team Activities are conducted in occordonce with written procedures or instructions. <

1 These procedures are developed as needed and, where appropriate, include acceptonce criterio. The specific procedures controlling the preparation, revision, review, and approval of Design Adequacy procedures, checklists, and instructions are:

1 o DAP Preparation of Checklists o DAP Development and Use of DAP Procedures and Discipline instructions.

6.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL l The Design Adequacy Review Team has established controls for the issuance,

! distribution, and use of Design Adequocy Procedures and instructions. Written t

procedures specify controls to ensure that the latest revisions of these documents are used by Design Adequacy Review Team personnel in the conduct TN-85-6262 Page 9 of II l

COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: I of the work. In addition, procedures controlling revisions to procedures and instructions (Section 5.0 obove) require that such revisions receive the some -

level of review as the originals.

7.0 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES Subcontracted services employed by the Design Adequacy Review Team will either be performed subject to the total requirements of this QA Program or subject to quality assurance program requirements specified in the procurement documents. Currently, any contracted services will be performed under the total requirements of this QA Program. Should it become necessary to contract services controlled under other QA requirements, DAP-18, Control of Subcontractors, will be issued with appropriate measures to ensure that contracted services are provided in occordance with procurement requirements.

8.0 NON-CONFORMING MATERIAL, PARTS, OR COMPOENTS Non-conforming design proctices or documentation identified by the Design Adequacy Review Team during its design verification activities are documented on Discreponey Reports as specified in DAP.2, Documentation and Trocking of Issues and Discrepancies Reports. These Discreponey Reports are used by the Design Adequacy Review Team only for evoluotion purposes. Copies of all Discreponey Reports will be submitted to TUGCO for evoluotion and processing under its non-conformance control system.

f l

I

!' TN-85-6262 Poge 10 of 12 l

. - , - . - ~.,, , , _ .----,,-m-- - - - - , , . _ , , _ , , , - - . , _ . , _ _ , , - - -, , _ . , - .

.,m_.ym...,_ , , , , , , _ . _ , , _ _

COMANCIE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 1

, (

\

v 9.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION The Design Adequocy Review Team has developed a written procedure, DAP-17, Corrective Action, to control the disposition of identified nonconformances associated with the Review Team's activities. DAP-17 includes requirements for the resolution of such nonconformances and the notification of offected oroord zotions. Identified nonconformances os well as corrective action toker are documented and reported to oppropriate levels of Design Adequacy Review Team monogement.

10.0 QA RECORDS DAP-14, DAP Records, hos been established to control the collection, storage and retention of records developed as a result of Design Adequocy Review Team octivities. At the completion of the work, Design Adequacy Review Team records shall be turned over the CPRT Program Director. Records are identifiable and retrievable and include the following:

o Discreponey Reports o Discipline Specific Results Reports o DAP Collective Evoluotion Report

- o QA Audit Reports o Personnel Training and Qualification Records o Checklists, Calculations and Engineering Evoluotions.

I1.0 AUDITS The Design Adequocy Program Quality Assurance Manager schedules and conducts planned and periodic audits of Design Adequacy Review Team g TN-85-6262 Poge 11 of 12 t-. .. - - - . _ _ _ _ - - - _ - . . . _ - _ _ - - _ - _ - _ - . - - . . _ - - , . - . - . - - .

COMANCFE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM

' QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: I v

octivities. ' Auditable requirements include those requirements defined in the CPRT Program Plan and Appendices, this OA Plan, and applicalle DAPs. The audits shall be conducted in occordance with DAP-16, Audits, by the DAP Quality Assurance Manager or personnel reporting to him. The person performing the audit, or leading the audit, if more than one person is on the audit team, shall be qualified

  • Ime equirements of ANSI N45.2.23, Sections 2.3.1 through 2.3.4 for Lead Aud ie... The results of audits shall be documented and provided to the Design Adequacy Review Team Leoder for his review.

v l

l TN-85-6262 Poge 12 of 12

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ - _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20202J060&oldid=3070954"