ML20202J349
| ML20202J349 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1986 |
| From: | Bajada E, Hansel J EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202J051 | List:
|
| References | |
| CPP-005, CPP-5, NUDOCS 8607170064 | |
| Download: ML20202J349 (14) | |
Text
'
I
. 1:
- Page 1 of 6 EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION C L g ggp},
,yg w
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLAN VII.c s
PROCEDURE NO: CPP-005 REVISION: 2 ISSUE DATE: 02/18/86 FOR ESTABLISHING POPULATIONS PREPARED BY: DATE: S fk!hh I APPROVED BY: . [. / AL'er44 DATE: D!/4/!ks I
ON-SITE QA REPRE [NTATIVE APPROVED BY: P1 DATE:
/f
/
QA/ REVIEW' TEAM LEADER 1
{
- O 8607170064 860711 5 PDR ADOCK 0000 i
l.
- CPP-005 Revision: 2 O
U 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure describes the method used to establish populations of safety related work completed, inspected, and accepted which will be subject to reinspection and documentation review on a sampling basis as required by Issue-Specific Action Plan (ISAP)
VII.c.
Moreover, this procedure includes provision for the identification and control of the interfaces between populations and the coordination among the participating organizations.
2.0 APPLICABILITY s
This procedure is applicable to safety-related hardware constructed and final QC accepted at Comanche Peak Units 1, 2, and areas common to both units.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 CPP-006, " Sample Selection."
/N 3.2 CPP-Oll, " Evaluations of Adverse Trend Analyses, Construction
(,) Deficiencies, and QA/QC Program Deficiencies."
4.0 GENERAL Major work activities are identified and assigned to the civil / structural, electrical, and mechanical discipline engineers.
These discipline engineers then conduct an evaluation of these major work activities by reviewing applicable drawings and specifications, codes, standards, work and inspection procedures, and by identifying the organizations, crafts and inspection groups who conducted the work. The work activities are normally relative to safety related hardware items which in turn form a population.
The grouping of reasonably homogeneous work activities with applicable hardware items provides a method for expeditiously randomly sampling the work activities.
4.1 Responsibilities 4.1.1 QA/QC Engineering Supervisor The QA/QC Engineering Supervisor is responsible to prepare the Master Population List. In addition, the Supervisor reviews and approves, Population
() Descriptions and Population Items Liste.
2 j
. , 3-
! CPP-005 Revision: 2 L/ 4.1.2 Engineering Deputy Program k nager The Engineering Deputy Program Manager reviews and approves the Master Population List.
4.1.3 QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineers QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineers are responsible to review and approve all Population Descriptions and review and approve those Population Items Lists that are specific to their discipline.
4.1.4 QA/QC Discipline Engineers I
QA/QC Discipline Engineers provide input to the hster s l . Population List and are responsible to complete Population Descriptions and Population Items Lists.
s
{
4.1.5 QA/QC Records Administrator 4
The QA/QC Records Administrator indicates the issue dates, distributes and controls the Master Population List, Population Descriptions, and controls the j Population Items Lists.
4.2 Policy j' Activities performed under this procedure shall conform to the policies contained in the latest Comanche Peak Response Team Program Plan, ERC Management Program Plan, and ISAP VII.c.
Should an activity be designated as the responsibility of a
- QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineer, or higher, it may be delegated
! by that engineer to an individual under his or her
- supervision.
i l 4.3 Conflicts i
In the case of a conflict between this procedure and the i documents referenced in Section 4.2, the latter shall govern.
4.4 Definitions
- 4.4.1 Population - Construction completed, inspected, and
- final QC accepted, safety-related groups of similar l components or activities, having common attributes that l are verifiable by similar reinspection and document i
review activities.
4.4.2 Work Activity - A process comprised of similar O characteristics relative to the techniques, codes, standards, criteria, organizations, crafts, and inspection groups used in the construction / acceptance of a hardware item.
3 '
l CPP-005 Revision: 2 O 4.4.3 Reinspections - Examinations of items which can be performed with meaningful results af ter construction is -
complete. Examples include configuration, visual weld, and location inspections. Reinspections are deemed infeasible if the examinations cannot be performed after construction. Examples of infeasible reinspections include in-process inspections such as verification of welding preheat, interpass, and post-weld heat treatment.
5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Master Population List s
QA/QC Discipline Engineers solicit information relative to establishing populations from Texas Utilities Generating Company project support personnel as required.
5.1.1 Preparation QA/QC Discipline Engineers review applicable architect / constructor specifications, design drawings, lists, standards, and codes to identify safety-related O construction activities that can be reinspected or verified by document review. The QA/QC Discipline Engineer documents the results of the review in a memorandum to the QA/QC Engineering Supervisor.
The memorandum defines the population and associated work activities, includes the rationale for the homogeneity of the work activities, and provides justification for those attributes for which less than the minimum random sample size will be reinspected or reviewed. (See Reference 3.1 to determine the minimum sample size.) The memorandum also describes the attributes for each work activity and its method of verification, e.g., reinspection and/or documentation review. Upon the completion of the review, the memorandum is forwarded to the QA/QC Engineering Supervisor for input into the Master Population List.
Subsequently, the QA/QC Engineering Supervisor reviews the information, completes the Master Population List in accordance with Attachment 6.1 then forwards it for review and approval.
5.1.2 Review and Approval The Engineering Deputy Program Manager reviews and O approves the Master Population List in accordance with Attachment 6.1.
4 l
. CPP-005 Revision: 2 3
5.1.3 Distribution and Control The Engineering Deputy Program Manager ensures that the approved Master Population List and any pertinent information used to prepare it, including the memorandum described above, are forwarded to the QA/QC Records Administrator (file location VII.c-4.A) for distribution control as required.
As a minimum, the QA/QC Records Administrator distributes copies of the Master Population List without attachments to the signatories and the QA/QC Review Team Leader (RTL).
5.2 Population Descriptions ,
5.2.1 Preparation The responsible QA/QC Discipline Engineers complete Population Descriptions in accordance with Attachment 6.2 for each population listed on the Master Population List.
5.2.2 Review and Approval
() Subsequently, each QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineer and the QA/QC Engineering Supervisor review and approve l
complete Population Descriptions in accordance with Attachment 6.2.
5.2.3 Distribution and Control The QA/QC Engineering Supervisor ensures that approved Population Descriptions are forwarded to the QA/QC Records Administrator (file location VII.c-4.B-1) for distribution and control.
As a minimum, the QA/QC Records Administrator distributes copies of the Population Descriptions to the signatories, the QA/QC RTL and the Engineering Deputy Program Manager.
5.3 Population Items List 5.3.1 Preparation Responsible QA/QC Discipline Engineers complete Population Items Lists in accordance with Attachment 6.3. The list identifies each safety-related item that is complete, accepted by QC, and within the population as indicated on the approved Population Description O Form. (Refer to Section 5.2.)
5
I CPP-005 Revision: 2 6
5.3.2 Review and Approval Subsequently, the QA/QC Lead Discipline Engine =r and the QA/QC Engineering Supervisor review and approve complete Population Items Lists in accordance with Attachment 6.3.
5.3.3 Distribution and Control The QA/QC Engineering Supervisor ensures that approved Population Items Lists are forwarded to the QA/QC Records Administrator (File Location VII.c-4.B-2) for distribution and control.
As a minimum, the QA/QC Records Administrator 5 distributes copies of Populations Items Lists to the sigaatories, the QA/QC RTL, and the Engineering Deputy Program Manager.
5.4 Revisions Revision to the documents referenced in this procedure, i.e.,
the Master Population List, the Population Descriptions, and the Population Items Lists, are prepared, reviewed, and
(] approved the same as the original issue. Unless the change v was extensive and the form was completely redone, revisions shall be indicated by a vertical line in the margin and adjacent to the approprite portion (s).
NOTE: A revision to any one page requires the redistribution of all pages.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 MasterPopulation!.istForm(SampleandInstruction) 6.2 Population Description Form and Continuation Sheet (Sample and Instruction) 6.3 Population Items List Form and Continuation Sheet (Sample and Instruction) 6
l
. Attcchment 6.1 CPP-005 Revision: 2 Page 1 of 2 L/
MASTER POPULATION LIST FORM COMANCRE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM MASTER POPULATION LIST PREPARED sT: (4) DATE: II)
QA/QC ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR s
POPUI.ATION DISCIPLINE POPULATION (CODE) DESCRIPTION (CODE) COMPLETION DATES (1) (2) (3)
O 9
REV 7 REV 6 REV 5 REV 4 REV 3 REV 2 PEV 1 ORIGINAL ISSUE APPROVAL ISSUE DATE CPP-003.1, Revision I
.- . . . - _ _ ... . . - . _ - - . . = . . - - _ _ - . - . . - . - _ - _ _
i lI l
Attachment 6.1 CPP-005 Revision: 2 Page 2 of 2 1
f l
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING i-FORM CPP-005.1
, " MASTER POPULATION LIST" 4
The QA/QC Engineering Supervisor enters: '
! (1) The discipline code, i.e., structura1(S), electrical (E),
i mechanical (M).
(2) The population code, e.g., conduit (CDUT).
(3) The date each Population Descri-; ion Form is approved.
(4) Name as preparer and date.
o NOTE: Upon the approval of all Population Descriptions, indicate " FINAL" in the appropriate issue block.
l The Engineering Deputy Program Manager reviews the Master Population List to ensure that it is accurate and to ensure that the necessary l documentation relative to the selection of the populations is evident.
! Upon the completion of a satisfactory review, the Manager:
(5) Initials and dates the form.
4 i
1 1
2
l
- Attachment 6.2 CPP-005 p Revision: 2 s j Page 1 of 3 v
1 POPULATION DESCRIPTION FORM COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM POPULATION DESCRIPTION POPL1ATION NAME: (II PACE: 10F II)
PREPARED BT (3) DATE: (}
RESPONSIBLE QA/QC DISCIPLINE ENGINEER SYSTDI, COMPONENTS, STRUCTURES, OR VORK ACTIVITIES:
(4)
O POPULATION BOUNDART:
o (4) i SPECIPIC INTERTACES:
l (4) i l
REV 6 REV $ REV 4 REV 3 REV 2 REV 1 ORIGINAL ISSUE i's ' STRUCT l
g APPP.0VALS
'.5.. SUPR ISSUE DATE CPP-005.ZA, Rev,ston 2
. i l
i
, Attachmsnt 6.2 CPP-005 Revision: 2 Page 2 of 3 POPULATION DESCRIPTION FORM (Continuation Page)
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM POPULATION DESCRIPTION POPULATION NAME: (1) PACE: (2) OF(2) s (4) 9 O GPP-005.28. Revision i
I Attachment 6.2 CPP-005 Revision: 2
- O.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FORMS CPP-005.2A and CPP-005.2B a
" POPULATION DESCRIPTION" The Responsible QA/QC Discipline Engineer enters:
(1) Population name.
(2) Page number information.
(3) Name as preparer and date.
(4) Population description including:
System, components, structures, or work activities O' included in the population.
1 The boundary of the population and any work specifically excluded.
i
- Specific interfaces between the referenced population l and other populations.
l The responsible QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineer and the QA/QC Engineering l Supervisor review Population Descriptions to ensure that they are complete, accurate, and otherwise consistent with the requirements of this procedure. Other QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineers review each Population Description to ensure that any appropriate interfaces are identified and that the identified interfaces are consistent with any Population Descriptions for which they are responsible. Upon the completion of satisfactory reviews, the reviewers:
(5) Initial and date the form. l k
i 3
I Attachment 6.3 CPP-005 Revision: 2 Page 1 of 3 POPULATION ITEMS LIST FORM COMANCHE PEAE RESPONSE TEAM POPULATION ITEMS LIST POPULATION NAME: III PAGE: 10F (2)
PREPARED BY: (3) DATE: (3) 5 RESPONSIBLE QA/QC DISCIPLINE ENGINEER POPULATION SOURCE:
(4)
O 9
BASIS FOR ACCEPTING THE LIST:
l (4) t l
I I
BASIS FOR ACCEPTING ANT ADDITIONAL ITEMS: !
(4) i i
j REV 6 REV 5 REV 4 REV 3 RE4 2 REV 1 ORIGINAL ISSUE V gt,7y APPROVALS l
ISSUE DATE CPP-005.JA, Revision 1
I
. Attachment 6.3 CPP-005 Revision: 2 Page 2 of 3 POPULATION ITEMS LIST FORM (Continuation Page)
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM POPUI.ATION ITEMS LIST POPULATION NAME: (1) PACE: (2) 0F (2)
- l. i
\
/ (4)
O 9 6
O CFF-003.JB. Revision 1 1
e
[
e Attachment 6.3 CPP-005 Revision: 2 O
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FORMS CPP-005.3A and CPP-005.3B "POPtJLATION ITEMS LIST" The Responsible QA/QC Discipline Engineer enters:
(1) Population name.
(2) Page number information.
(3) Name as preparer and date.
(4) Population items selected, or references an attached list, and:
Identifies the source of the Population List.
Provides the basis for accepting the list as valid, e.g., the list identifies construction completed, inspected, and QC accepted safety-related groups of similar components or activities having common attributes that are verifiable by similar reinspection and document review.
NOTE: Should the population be identified as a result of a deficiency evaluation, reference and attach the sample expansion plan. (See Reference 3.2.)
The QA/QC Lead Discip'.ine Engineer and the QA/QC Engineering Supervisor review Population Items Lists to ensure that they are complete, accurate, and consistent with the requirements of this procedure. Upon the completion of satisfactory reviews, the reviewers:
(5) Initial and date the form. l r
i k l
3