ML20202J097

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 6 to Quality Instruction QI-057, Documentation Review of Fill & Backfill Placement
ML20202J097
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/1986
From: Hansel J, Patterson A
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J051 List: ... further results
References
QI-057, QI-57, NUDOCS 8607170024
Download: ML20202J097 (21)


Text

'

Paga 1 of 11 EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION CO M O_'_D C0?Y CONTROL N0_ b F 00)

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION FOR ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLAN VII.c

)

INSTRUCTION No.: QI-057 REVISION: 6

~

ISSUE DATE: 06/27/86 DOCUMENTATION REVIEW OF FILL AND BACKFILL PLACEMENT l

Prepared by: Date: 4 - 2.f- 85 Approved by: ' M *~ Date: [-26 U Issue Coordinator Approved by: Date: [P-20' h[o On-Site QA p resentative QA/ Review Team Leader '

8607170024 860711 5 PDR ADOCK 0500

^

l. - . _ __ _ . . _ _ . _ . _ _ - . _ . . - _ _ _ - _ ---_ . _ _----- - _ . . ~ _ _ _ - - - -

e k

' QI-057 Rev. 6 7s 1.0 PURPOSE This Quality Instruction (QI) presents the attributes and accept /

reject criteria for the performance of a documentation review for fill,and backfill placement.

2.0 APPLICABILITY This QI applies to the performance of an independent review of the documentation for the safety-significant attributes for all

, safety-related soil / rock fill and backfill placement in Unit 1, 4 Unit 2, and common areas. It applies to the samples selected from the population described in the Population Description for Fill and Backfill Placement.

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 CPP-009, " Performance of Reinspections and Documentation Reviews".

3.2 QA/QC-RT-497, " Description Memorandum for Document Review of Fill and Backfill Placement".

O 4.0 GENERAL Documentation reviews are performed and documented in accordance with established CPRT procedures. Reference 3.1 addresses the method to perform and document the reviews. Reference 3.2 contains: a list of the source documents for each attribute, a

! list of attributes which have been excluded from the documentation review, a justification for each exclusion, and a list of any alternate accept / reject criteria.

i

! 4.1 Responsibilities 4.1.1 QA/QC Discipline Engineers The QA/QC Discipline Engineers prepare the QI delineating review attributes and accept / reject criteria.

4.1.2 QA/QC Inspectors QA/QC Inspectors perform documentation review in accordance with reference 3.1 and this QI and record l results and deviations.

, 4.2 Policy Activities performed under this procedure shall conform to the i policies contained in the latest Comanche Peak Response Team Program Plan and Issue-Specific Action Plan VII.c.

2

QI-057 Rsv. 6 5.0 INSTRUCTION Using the information below, perform the documentation reviews on the sample items listed for this population and document the results on the applicable checklist (Attachment 6.1 for SSI Dam, otherwise Attachment 6.2).

Documentation to be reviewed is located as follows:

  • Inspection reports and related laboratory test results are located in the TUGCO Vault.
  • Personnel certification records are located in the TUGC0 Vault /PPRV.

Note: For the checklist attributes which follow, specific notation of each attribute is preferable. However, notation of a more general nature, such as by reference to specification section, may be acceptable. Consult population engineer for advice in such cases.

A. SSI Dam Fill A.1 General Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that:

a. No construction was noted as being not in accordance with contract plans and/or specifications.
b. The zones of the embankment and outer slopes l were delineated at approximately 100'

, intervals at least every 5' in elevation.

I

c. The hauling equipment did not cause horizontal shears or slickensides, rutting, quaking, heaving, cracking, or excessive deformation of embankment.
d. Materials were secured from approved borrow sources.
e. The foundation against which the embankment was placed was prepared as required.

A.2 Impervious Material Placement Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation

/ that:

a. The combined excavation, placing and spreading operation was done in such a manner to obtain a blend of material prior to compacting.

l l 3

QI-057 Rev. 6

/~~h 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

A. SSI Dam Fill (Cont'd)

b. The material was spread in approximately horizontal layers not more than 8" thick before compacting.
c. The surface of the embankment was roughened and loosened prior to placing the succeeding layer.
d. The hauling equipment was routed over the surface of the embankment to distribute compactive effort.

e.

The center portion was crowned so that the fill would drain freely.

f. All roots and debris and all stones greater than 6" were removed prior to compaction.

A.3 Rock Fill Placement Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that:

v a. The rock fill was spread in approximately horizontal layers not more than 24" thick prior to compaction.

b. Roots and debris if present were removed from the fill prior to compaction.

A.4 Filter Placement Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that:

a. The material was placed in lifts not exceeding 12" loose and loose lift thickness was noted,
b. Care was taken to avoid contamination.
c. The material was placed by equipment that i does not induce segregation.
d. Contamination by adjacent material, roots, or j other debris was avoided.

() A.5 Moisture Control l Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation i that:

l 4

QI-057 Rev. 6 4

(V) 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

A. SSI Dam Fill (Cont'd)

The filter zones were wet sufficiently to a.

avoid segregation at time of placement and compaction.

b. The impervious fill borrow pits were irrigated as required.

A.6 Processing of Impervious Fill Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that:

. a. The moisture content was uniformly distributed throughout the layer of soil

, prior to compaction.

b. The surface of the previously compacted layer was moist prior to placing the succeeding layer,
c. Over wet layers were allowed to dry to proper moisture content (if necessary) prior to j

O compacting.

A.7 Processing Rock Fill Material Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that:

a. Each layer was placed to produce a well graded mass with minimum practical percentage of voids.
b. Large stones were well distributed in the entire mass of stone.
c. The fill was placed in conjunction with the central core and filter system.

A.8 Compaction Equipment Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that the compacting equipment conforms to requirements.

A.9 Impervious Fill Compaction l

() Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that:

i l

5

QI-057 Rev. 6 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

[o'i A. SSI Dam Fill (Cont'd)

a. Each lift was given eight (8) passes with tamping roller or a combination of four (4) passes with tamping roller followed by four (4) passes with a pneumatic roller as required or by eight (8) passes of pneumatic roller as directed.
b. The rolling sequence or pattern followed for each lift was per requirements.

l

c. The test sample was taken below the indention

! of the sheep's foot roller, or below six

'l inches (6") whichever is the greater depth.

A.10 Filter Compaction Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation that the material was placed with a spreader box that I does not induce segregation.

l i A.11 Rock Fill Compaction Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify notation i that:

a. Each lift received a minimum of four (4) passes with vibratory roller as required.

l

b. The number of additional passes requirea were noted on the Inspector's Daily Report.

A.12 Testing

a. Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify l that referenced testing is consistent with frequency of testing requirements for fill (see Attachment 6.3).
b. Review the Inspector's Daily Report to verify that locations for all referenced tests are l clearly noted.
c. Review all referenced test results to verify that location description is consistent with the Inspector's Daily Report location

! description.

!O l 6

QI-057 Rev. 6

( 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

L A. SSI Dam Ffll (Cont'd)

d. Review in-place density test results (excluding rapid compaction results) listed on the Inspector's Daily Report to verify that minimum acceptable in-place density requirements, as summarized on Attachment 6.4, are met,
e. Review any relative density or maximum dry density test referenced on the in-place density test form to verify that the applicable (i.e., most up-to-date) test is referenced.
f. Review relative density or maximum dry density test results to verify consistency with the values reported on the in-place density test form.
g. Review any rapid compaction test results to verify that minimum acceptable in-place density requirements for impervious fill, as i summarized on Attachment 6.4, were met.
h. -Review any material test results (i.e.,

gradation, Atterberg limit, soundness, or flatness and elongation test results) referenced on the Inspector's Daily Report to verify that requirements, as summarized on i

Attachment 6.4 are met.

l A.13 Inspection and Test Personnel Certification Verify that Inspection and Test personnel were certified to perform the inspections and tests at the time they were performed.

B. Fill and Backfill (except for SSI Dam)

B.1 Extent of Backfill Review the Inspection Report to verify that the extent of backfill covered by the report is clearly identified either on the lead sheet or on attached sketch.

B.2 Soil Backfill Placement Signature Card

!O a. Review the Inspection Report to verify notation (*) that a Soil Backfill Placement Signature Card was completed which would cover the topic backfill.

7

QI-057

, Rsv. 6 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

B. Fill and Backfill (Cont'd)

b. Review the applicable soil backfill placement signature card to verify that it was signed and dated to indicate satisfactory completion of pertinent discipline requirements or lack thereof.

B.3 Stockpiles 1

Review the Inspection Report to verify notation (*)

I that:

a. Stockpiles were constructed to prevent

. contamination and segregation.

b. Stockpiles were properly identified.

B.4 Preparation of Working Surface Review the Inspection Report to verify notation (*) that l working surface was free of foreign material.

. B.5 Placement of Backfill

' N' Review the Inspection Report to verify notation (*)

that:

a. Backfill was placed in horizontal lifts not thicker than 8" loose.
b. Moisture content of the material was controlled in obtaining the required density.

B.6 Testing

a. Review the Inspection Report to verify that referenced testing is consistent with frequency of testir.g requirements (See Attachment 6.5).

Note: In case evaluation of this attribute is not possible due to attribute B.1 having been marked " reject", this attribute should be marked neither

" accept" nor " reject". Instead, an explanatory remark should be added on the checklist (e.g., " evaluation not possible. ..due to rejection of B.1")

(

8

QI-057 Rev. 6

() 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

B. Fill and Backfill (Cont'd)

b. Verify that locations for all referenced tests are clearly noted either on the Inspection Report itself, on an attached sketch, or on the reference tests.

, c. Review all referenced test results to verify that location description is not inconsistent with the Inspection Report location description.

Note: Notations of location may not be as

, specific as on the Inspection Report, but should be identifiable to the same location.

l

d. Review in-place density test results listed on the Inspection Report to verify that the density acceptance criteria, as summarized on Attachment 6.6, are met.
e. Review the in-place density test form to i verify that the applicable (i.e., most up-to-date) reference values for relative density (or maximum dry density) have been used for the relative density (or percent maximum dry density) determination shown on the in-place density test form.
f. (intentionally left blank) l l
g. Review gradation test results listed on the Inspection Report to verify that the I

gradation acceptance criteria, as summarized on Attachment 6.6, are met.

B.7 Preparation of Trenches for Buried Pipe and Electrical Duct Banks Review the Inspection Report to verify notation (*)

that:

a. Trench was excavated to required width and i depth.

I l b. Claystone was removed to the required depth when encountered.

i I

QI-057 Rev. 6 V\ 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

U B.8 Backfill / Bedding Placement for Buried Pipe and Electrical Duct Banks Review the Inspection Report to verify notation (*)

that:

i

a. Any bedding material placed was placed in horizontal lifts not thicker than 6" loose.
b. Moisture content of the material was controlled in obtaining the required density.

_ c. Any bedding material placed for pipe was shaped to fit curvature of pipe for a width i

of at least 60% of pipe diameter.

d Appliceble pipe spacing was maintained during backfill operation.

e. Any bedding material placed was hand-tamped i around any cable, conduit or duct bank for a minimum distance of 12".

(-~s)

  • Note: In lieu of specific notations for each of the following
y lettered items, a general notation which covers several of the items along with the notation " Inspection completed, all applicable items satisfactory" and a

~

clear reference to "QI-QP-11.0-9" is acceptable.

( ,

B.9 Inspection and Test Personnel Certification l

l  ? Verify that the Inspection Report and any test results reviewed under B.6 were signed / initialed by personnel who were certified to perform the inspections and tests

's at the time of performance. Basis for verification is the TUGC0 " Inspection Certification" form. Form should show certification to appropriate TUGC0 procedure for task performed.

EXCEPTION TO THE ABOVE: For Inspection Reports written prior to July 12, 1978:

^

For Test Personnel:

s" Verify that any test results reviewed under B.6 were signed / initialed by personnel who were certified to perform the tests at the time of performance. Basis for certification is the R. W. Hunt Company certificate which should show certification to applicable R. W.

O Hunt method for tests performed.

10

' QI-057 Rev. 6

() 5.0 INSTRUCTION (Cont'd)

B. Fill and Backfill (Cont'd)

For Inspection Personnel:

Verify that the Inspection Report was signed by personnel who were certified to perform the inspection at the time of performance. Basis for verification is the Brown & Root Certification Summary Record.

If this attribute is rejected:

1) Record the person (s) name on the Deviation Report (DR).
2) Record on the DR whether the person was ever

. appropriately certified and note any pertinent dates.

6.0 Attachments

-s 6.1 Checklist: Fill and Backfill Placement (SSI DAM) (2 pages)

~

6.2 Checklist

Fill and Backfill Placement (Except for SSI Dam)

(2 Pages) 6.3 CPSES SSI Dam Test Program (3 pages)

6.4 Summary

Acceptance Criteria for SSI Dam Fill 6.5 Minimum Frequency of Testing Requirements: Backfill and Bedding

6.6 Summary

Acceptance Criteria for Fill and Packfill (Except for SSI Dam) l 0

l 1 - ._-n

Attachment 6.1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QI-057 7- g CHECKLIST Rev. 6 b POPULATION DESC VERIFICATION PKG NO.

Fill & Backfill R-S-FILL- PAGE 1 0F __jt Placement (SSI Dam)

QUALITY INSTRUCTION QI-057 REINSPECTION

[)) UNIT 1 EQUIPMENT MARK / TAG NO. X DOCUMENTATION REVIEW UNIT 2 Inspector's Daily Report No.

] COMMON VERIFICATION ANBME ACCEPT REJECT DATE RMS A SSI DAM

.. A.1 General

a. Plans & Specifications i b. Zone Delineation
c. Damage due to
hauling Equipment

! d. Borrow Sources I e. Foundation Requirements

  • A.2 Impervious Material Placement O-s- a. Material Blend
b. Layer Thickness i c. Surface Roughening
d. Distribution of Compactive Effort
e. Crowning
f. Debris Removal A.3 Rock Fill Placement
a. Layer Thickness
b. Debris Removal A.4 Filter Placement
a. Layer Thickness
b. Avcid Contamination
c. Avoid Segregation
d. Contamination Avoided A.5 Moisture Control
a. Filter Zone Wetting
b. Borrow Pit Irrigation A.6 Processing Impervious Fill
a. Moisture PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

DISCIPLINE ENGR. DATE LEAD DISCIPLINE ENGR. DATE INSPECTED BY: APPROVED BY:

i INSPECTOR DATE LEAD INSPECTOR DATE CPP-007.lA, Revision 0

Attachment 6.1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM 01-057

(~

L,')

CHECKLIST Rev. 6 POPULATION DESC VERIFICATION PKG NO.

Fill 5 Backfill R-S-FILL- PAGE 2--' 0F 2 Placement (SSI Dam)

VERIFICATION A REMARKS ACCEPT REJECT DATE

b. Surface Moistening
c. Over wet Layers A.7. Processing Fockfill
a. Layer Placement
b. Stones Distribution
c. Placement Coordinat Lon A.8 Compaction Equipment A.9 Impervious Fill Compaction
a. Number of Passes
b. Rolling Pattern
c. Test Sampling A.10. Filter Compaction A.ll Rock Fill Compaction
a. Number of Passes
b. Additional Passes A.12 Testing

(\-- a. Frequency of Testinlt

b. IDR Test Location
c. Test Results Test Location
d. Density Criteria Me1:
e. Reference Applicability
f. Reference Cor.sistency
g. Rapid Compaction
h. Material Testing A.13 Personnel Certification _

v

~

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM Attachment 6.2 CHECKLIST QI-057 POPULATION DESC VERIFICATION PKG NO.

Fill & Backfill Placement F-S-FILL- PAGE 1 0F 2 (Except for SSI Dam)

QUALITY INSTRUCTION QI-057 [ REINSPECTION C UNIT 1 EQUIPMENT MARK / TAG NO. X DOCUMENTATION REVIEW UNIT 2 COMMON VERIFICATION i

A M IB M ACCEPT REJECT DATE REMARKS B Fill and Backfill (Except For SSI DAM)

B.1 Extent of Backfill B.2 Soil Backfill Placement Signature Card

a. IR Notation a
b. Signed and Dated B.3 Stockpiles
a. Construction
b. Identification B.4 Preparation of Working Surface B.5 Placement of Backfill
a. Lift Thickness l
b. Moisture Control PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

l DISCIPLINE ENGR. DATE LEAD DISCIPLINE ENGR. DATE INSPEctr.u BY: APPROVED BY: ,

l LNSFECTOR DATE LEAD INSPECTOR DATE CPP-007.1A, Revision 0

4 Attachment 6.2 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM 01-057 fg CHECKLIST Rev. 6 t

]

F0FULATION DESC VERIFICATION FKG NO.

Fill & Backfill Placement R-S-FILL- PAGE 2"-" 0F 2 (Except for SSI Dam)

VERIFICATION A ARKS ACCEPT REJECT DATE B.6 Testing

a. Frequency of Testing
b. Inspection Report Test Location
c. Test Results Test Location
d. Density Criteria Met
e. Reference Applicability
f. Reference Consistenc y ,
g. Gradation Testing B.7 Preparation of Trench es l a. Trench Excavation l
b. Claystone Removal B.8 Backfill / Bedding Placement
a. Lift Thickness
b. Moisture Control
c. Shaped Bedding
d. Pipe Spacing
e. Hand-Tamping B.9 Personnel Certification

\s l

l n

m . .

a .

COMA 14CHE PEAK STEAtt ELECINIC MATICM SAFE SHUTDOWN DiPOUNLP.ENT DAM TEST PROGRAM n -

om Froceaures frequency of Spect(k.ation a m Quality Control Test Reference Location Testing ** Acceptance Criteria Re f erence - m c m Dental Concrete Cm Cement ASTM C150-73a Mfg. Ea. Source See Specifications 101.4.2.3A - .,

Fine Aggregate ASTM C33-71a Supplier Ea. Source See Specifications 101.4.2.3 '

u Coarse Aggregate ASTM C33-71a Supplier Ea. Source See Specifications 101.4.2.4 .

Water U. S. Puolic -

Health Standards

  • x (1%2Rev.) Supply Ea. So'urce See Specifications 101.4.2.5 * ~

Mixed On Site Concrete Supplier Ea. Source See Specifications *

~

ASTM C94-73a 101.4.2.9 ,

Curing rempound ASTM C309-73 Supplier Ea. Source See Specifications 101.4.2.15 -

Tests-Compression ASTM CJ9-72 Work Site Not less than 2 ,, -

tests of 2 cy1/ day , m nor less than 2 tests of 2 cy1/100 C.Y.

Pneumatically Placed Concrete 3 R Cement ASTM C150-73a Mfg. Ea, Source ASTM C150 101.4.3.2.1 3 7 O Fine Aggregate y Organic Impurities ASTM C40-73 Stockplie Ea. Source See Specifications 101.4.3.2.2 3

& 2 5 Deleterious Substacces ASIM C33-71a Stockplie Ea. Source See Specifications 101.4.3.2.2 x  ;;

3 Fineness Modulus ASTM C33 71a Stockptie Ea. Source See Specifications 101.4.3.2.2 '

o Grading ASTM C136-11 Stockpile Ea. Source See Specifications 1 01.4.3.2.2 I Motsture ASTM D2216-71 Stockpile 1 Per Day See Specifications 101.4.3.2.2 Tests-Compression ASTM C39-72 Work Site 2 Tests of 2 Cy1. See Specifications 101.4.3.5 .

Cy). per day .~ F Compacted Fill v. 1 Rock Fill '. " -

Gradation PSAR In Place 1 per 60,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.5.4.3 1. S SouMness AS M C88-73 In Quarry 1 per 60.000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.5.2.3 "

ar.d/or 4 _

Stockpile L Specific Gravity ASTM C127-73 In Place 1 per 60,000 C Y. N/A N/A */ E Density TS12 in Place 1 per 60,000 C.Y. N/A N/A  % o Filtec ".

Gradition 1 per 3,000 C.Y.

  • M-J In Place See Specifications ?St.5.4.4 Soundness SSTM CE8-73 In Place 1 per 30,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.5.4.4 --

mmo>

Density f4TM D1556-64 or In Place 1 per shift or See Specifications 101.5.9.2 'a m to M rt ,

ASIM D2167-66 In Place 1 per lif t See Specifications 101.5.9.2  % [ $ .4 $ $ l Relative Density A;TM D2049-69 In Place 1 per 3,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.5.9.2 =

g 3g j o  !

Sheet 1 of 3 m g j m l W

4 L

CD'MNCi!E PEAK STEAM EL[C1RIC STATION (Continued)

SAFE SHUTDGWN IMP 0Ut& INT DAM TEST PROGkAM Procedures n --.

frequency of Specifications Qaality Control Test Reference Location Tes ting" o :ise Acregtance Criteria Feference i m

.- m torervious Fill *

  • Acceptance Test Moisture ". m USBR Monograph In Place Min.1/Lif t or - .,
  1. 26 Min. 1/';ht f t Density USBR Monograph In Place Min. 1/ Lift or See Spectffcations 101.5.1.1 $2 ,
  1. 26 Min.17Shif t See Specifications Liquid Limit 101.5.9.1 -

ASTM D423-66 Borrow Min. I per 4,000 C.Y r

  • 1 Pt. Method Pit or Suspected Chg. In * ~

m terials See Specifications 101.5.4.2 I" Plastic Limit ASTM D424-59 Borrow Min.1 per 4,000 C.Y.

Pit or Suspected Chg. In -[ '

Materials See Specifications 101.5.4.2 "., v.

Record Test .

Moisture ASTM D2216-71 In Place Min.1 per 3,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.5.7.1 Density ASTM D2167-66 N or D1556-64 3 0  ?

"r 0-M Relationship or D2937-71 AASH0-T99-70 In Place Min. 1 per 3,000 C.Y. See Specifications In Place Each Sign!ficant 101.5.9.1 1 i

! j 2 Change of Material R 9 A Liquid Limit N/A N/A 7  ;;

ASTM D423-66 In Place Min. I per 3,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.5.4.2 c y Plastic Limit ASTM D424-59 In Place Min.1 per 3,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.5.4.2 g

- Information Test .

i Motsture ASTM D3017-72 In Place As Necessary See Specifications Density 101.5.7.1 =

ASTM D2922-71 In Place To verify Inspector's -

~

I Judgment See Specifications 101.5.9.1 e i Liquid Limit M-J In Place As Necessary See Specifications 101.5.4.2 i

Plastic Limit M-J In Place To verify inspector's ~ s Judgment See Specifications 101.5.4.2 2 . . .

Gravel Roadway -.

Gradation M-J Work Site 1 per 10,000 C.Y. See Spectitcations 7 Liquid Limit 101.6.2 j_

ASTM D423-66 Work Site I per 10,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101,6.2 l$ e Plasticity Index ASTP D424-59 Work Site 1 per 10,000 C.V. See Specifications 101.6.2 L o Bar Shrinkage TH0 Method 107-E ** * -

Rev. 1 Jan. 72 Work Site 1 per 10,000 C.Y. See Specifications 101.6.2

  • foundation Inspection
  • M-J Foundation Upon Completion of -

90 o >

bcavation See Specifications 101.4.4 y

, 7 .$ om 7%

Sheet 2 of 3 I ,$@

3

=

R W

i

r 1

V I

I l

i i

i i COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (Continued)

SAFL SHUTDOWN IMP 00NDENT DAM TEST PROGRAM " ' " '

o se Procedures frequency of Specifications ',",

Quality Control Test Reference Location Testing ** Acceptance Criteria Reference c m Coring Test

  • U.S.A.C.E. In Place At 501 and 1001 "m

M-J Stability Analysis completion of Core of Embankment N/A r >

Concrete Constructor will identify tests and conduct Quality Assurance *

  • Reinforcing Steel Constructor will identify tests and conduct Quality Assurance ""

i w j e-

. n

[mo

-m

, = Y 7 w 3 2 R I

E & 1 5 " 0 u  ?

1.

2 R i

  • Hold Point p h

]'

    • Tests regstred on a per shift or per day basis are not 7 5' reestred unless the constructor is placing material. 3 i -

j 7 I a 3 E j

i L

a o I 2 e

x: o >

oHn

! . <: I n

-

  • Om

~ rn n Sheet 3 of 3 o @ @N7

! 1 5 l _"_ _ . E b N U i

AtttChmint 6.4 01-057 Rev. 6 (m

D') Page 1 of I StMMARY: ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR SSI DAM FILL MINIMt;M ,

GRADATION ft,AT AND MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE '

MATERIAL OR ELONGATED LOOSE LIFT IN-PLACE TYPE CLASSIFICATION SOUNDNESS PARTICLES ICKNESS DENSITY IMPERVIOUS CH or CL N/A N/A 8"* 95Z of maximus FILL with liquid density with a limit > 302 moisture content

(" CORE")

  • within !! dry to 3% wet, of optimum per I AASHO Test T99  !

i 1

- ;3IEVE PERCEh7 I SIZE PASSING I

FILTER I/2" 100 "A" #4 78-100 lfl0 50-85 lf40 33-60 The quantity of l#100 8-27 Maximum loss 251 flat and elongated

  1. 200 0-10 weighted average particles in

! at 5 cycles in separate groups as 12" 80Z relative density

, Magnesium Sulphate defined and per ASTM D2049 FILTER  ! SIEVE PERCENT,per ASTM C88 determined by CRD-

"B" ISIZE PASSING C-119 shall not 100 exceed 251 in any fD)

(_/

16"

'3" 3/4"88-100 60-78 size group.

  1. 4 32-45

!#10 15-26

f40 0-10 1 Not more than 253 SIEVE PERCENT Maximum loss 35% or rock particles SIZE PASSING weighted average (by number) passing ROCK FILL 30" 100 at 5 cycles in the 24" sieve and 12" 75-95 Magnesium Sulphate retained on the 4" 4" 25-70 per ASTM C88 sieve shall have a 24" N/A 1" 0-26 breadth or thickness 1/4" 0-8 of less than one-third (1/3) of its' length.

e Except: if material cannot be compacted by roller equipment because of inadequate clearances, material shall be spread in 4" layers and compacted with power tampers.

NOTE: Summary is bas,ed on the following sections from Freese and Nichols Specification FNSSI-1, Rev.

12:

Material Type FNSSI-l Sections Impervious Fill 101.5.4.2, 101. 5.5, 101.5.6.1, 101.5. 7.1. and 101. 5.9.1 Filter "A" & "B" 101.5.4.4. 101.5.6.3, and 101.5.9.2 Rock Fill 101.5.4.3 and 101.5.6.2 L)

N- . .

,~' -

Attachment 6.5 QI-057 Rev. 6 i(]

x/

, Page 1 of I A

ATTACH.ifENT To nC/DDA-154 f

I. B.\CKFII.L Minimum Test Location Frequency

1) Maximum dry density AASHTO Designation In Place One test per and optimum moisture T-99 Method D 2000 cu. yds or suspected change in  !

material.

2) Density in place ASTM D2922/ ASTM 2216 In Place One test per 3 1*

ASTM D2167 or lifts or 500 cu.

ASTM D1556 yds, which is greater or as otherwise dir -

ected by the Engineer, i

3) Cradation ASTM C-136 in Place One test per 3 lifts or 300 cu.

! yds. which is greater or as otherwise di-i rected by the

( j Engineer.

]- II. BEDDINr.

j Minimum

. Test Location Frequency

1) Relative Density ASTM D2049 In Place One test per 2000 cu. yds.

' or suspected change in material.

2) Density in place ASTM DZ922/ ASTM 2216 In Place One test per 3 ASTM D2167 or lifts ur 500 ASTM D1556 cu. yds which is greater or as otherwise directed by the Engineer.
3) Gradation ASTM C-136 In Place one test per 3 lifts or 500 cu.

yds, which is greater or as otherwise di-rected by the EnAi neer.

Flesse note that those are minimum testing frequencies and additional test should be taken as determined necessary by the contractor and/or testing agency.

\

J

7 . .

Attachment 6.6 QI-057 Rev. 6 i Page 1 of 1

SUMMARY

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR FILL AND BACKFILL (Except for SSI Dam)

GRADATION MAXIMUM DENSITY MATERIAL TYPE SIEVE SIZE  % PASSING LOOSE LAYER REQUIREMENTS (U.S. STD.) BY WEIGHT THICKNESS Soil Backfill

, 2" 100 1" 50-85 95% of maximum dry 1/2"- 25-65 8" density per

, AASHTO No. 4 15-50 Designation T99, Method D Backfill material No. 10 5-40 surrounding and

, above pipes No. 40 0-20 other than Os bedding No. 100 0-10 Gradation Alternatives 3/8" 100 100 i No. 4 80-100 95-100 Pipe bedding and material No. 8 65-90 80-100 l

replacing

claystone No. 16 50-75 50-85 80 % relative

! density per ASTM l No. 30 40-60 25-60 6" D2049 No. 50 30-45 10-30 i

No. 100 15-25 2-10 No. 200 0-10 -

Note: Summary is based on the following:

r Gibbs & Hill Specification 2323-SS-6, Rev. 2 Sec. 5.0 Gibbs & Hill Specification 2323-SS-8, Rev. 3, Sees. 8.0 & 9.0 1 CPSES DC/DDA 259, 9-20-77 l

CPSES DC/DDA 461, 10-28-77

_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . - . _ , _ , . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ . . _ _ _ . . - _ _ -