ML20202J301

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to DAP-14, Design Adequacy Program Records
ML20202J301
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/1986
From:
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J051 List: ... further results
References
DAP-14, NUDOCS 8607170054
Download: ML20202J301 (16)


Text

.

7- TITLE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM RECORDS

(]

NUMBER DAP-14 Revision epored Date Reviewed Date Approved Date 0 F. Be"rt Oh7fW 'Y}g( l0f/W

  1. 4"% %4 %h mQ #

o 1

D ADO K 00445

,A ,

PDR, TN-85-6262/14 i C0tHROLLLD COPY NO. D3_ ,

r, O

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pm C ove r S hee t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Tab le o f Cont e n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.0 P UR P OS E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 2.0 SCOPE..................................................... I 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 4.0 I NS TR U CT IO N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5.0 DO C U ME NT AT I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 ATTACHMENTS A DOCUMENT EXCERPT COVER SEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-l .

B DOCUMENT USE CODING SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-l C

EXAMPLE FILE INDEX FOR DAP DISCIPLIE FILE . . . . . . . .. . . . . C-1 ld D F ILE C ONTE NT LOG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-l i

i 1

1 i

i D

\ .i TN-85-6262/14 g, j

i t

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-14

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: I Os RECORDS 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure sets forth the basic requirements for the establishment, mainte-nonce and disposition of tne CPSES Design Adequocy Program Records.

2.0 SCOPE The CPRT Program Director will be responsible for establishing and maintaining the CPRT Program Centrol Files to be located in the CPRT Program offices m the CPSES site. These files are the program master files and will ultir<ately e contain all of the permanent records of the CPRT.

During the course of completing Discipline Specific Action Plans (DSAP), files ore required to be maintained by the DAP review team conducting the O- Investigation. At the time the Results Report is submitted to the Senior Review Team (SRT), these files will be turned over to the CPRT Program Director for permanent control and retention. b The specific scope of this procedure includes the definition of the types of DAP files that are to be maintained, their content, their control and the process for transfer of information.

3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES l 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 CPRT Centrol Files l

The CPRT Centrol Files are under the control of the CPRT Program Director and will eventvolly serve os full documentation of CPRT octivities and conclu-sions.

TN-85 6262/14 Pone I nf 9 l

. COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE l Number: DAP-14

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: 1 RECORDS 3.1.2 DAP General File and Discipline Files The two main files maintained by the DAP Program are the DAP General File b

and the Discipline Files. 1 The DAP General File contains information generically relevant to the Design Adequocy Program. Such documentation includes generic correspondence and generic source and reference material. This file is routinely accessed and ougmented during the course of the review.

V The Discipline Files contain the completed work of the DAP disciplines and relevant source documentation reviewed by the DAP. Togett er, these files are the " working files" within the context of the CPRT Program Plan until transfer to the CPRT Centrol File. This context of " working files" is not the some os the b DSAP Working Files defined in the following section. Working Fibs os used in the remainder of this procedure shall refer to the DSAP Working Files os defined in the following section. .

3.1.3 DSAP Working Files The Working Files for each Discipline Specific Action Plan contain in process documentation relevant to the specific DSAP. Such documentation includes source and reference material relevant to the DSAP, DSAP specific correspon-dence, and preliminary documents generated by the DSAP (e.g., engineering evoluotions, calculations, checklists, inspection reports, safety significance

evoluotions, etc.) These files are routinely accessed and augmented during the review process. DAP documentation when completed in occordance with applicable DAP procedures is filed in the Discipline Files. For example, b l opproved criterio lists and checklist forms are placed in the oppropriate Discipline File. A copy of such completed documentation may also be retained in the DSAP Working File.

I TN-85-6262/14 Pooe 2 of 9

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE

\ .

Number: DAP-14

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: I (D

y) RECORDS 3.2 Responsibilities

)

3.2.1 Review Team Leader 1

The Review Team Leader ensures that DAP records are controlled and organized in accordance with the CPRT requirements. As such, he has overall responsi-ld l bility for the quality and integrity of the DAP General File and Discipline Files until they are turned over to the CPRT Program Director.

ld In oddition, he shall coordinate with the CPRT Program Director to arrange for on independent review of the Discipline Files in advance of submittel of the Results Report to the SRT.

lg E

3.2.2 DAP Manager O The DAP Monoger oversees the development, implementation and maintenance

'of the DAP records system. He controls the DAP General File and the Discipline -

Files.

d i

j 3.3 Discipline Coordinators l The Discipline Coordinators are responsible for the quality and integrity of the l

Working Files pertaining to their respective disciplines. During the preparation of tne Results Report for o given Action Plon, the Discipline Coordinators ensure that the Discipline Files conform to tne requirements of this procedure.

They shall ensure that campleted DAP-produced documents are provided to tne DAP Monoger for inclusion in ine Discipline Files and tnot oppropriate source and reference m>:terial is forwarded to the DAP Monoger for inclusion in the l files in a timely manner.

O TN-85-6262/14 Page 3 of 9

\

l

. COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: 1 Number: DAP-14 RECORDS ,

i 3.4 Reviewers Each reviewer is responsible for the identification, collection, and retention of documents used in the progress of his investigation. At the conclusion of review efforts, the reviewers must ensure that all documents used to directly support the results or conclusions of DAP Action Plans are available for transfer to the g  ;

Discipline Files. Eoch reviewer is responsible for reviewing the documents he used during the investigation and identifying the purpose served by eacn document using the procedures presented herein.

4.0 INSTRUCTIONS 4.1 DSAP Working Files O)

( Tne DSAP Working Files contain work in progress and as documents are completed they are transferred to the Discipline Files under the control of the DAP Manager. The turned-over information will include all material upon which' the conclusions of the individual Action Plan Results Reports are based but will not incorporate irrelevant information. The Discipline Coordinator or reviewer may retain a copy of documents transferred to the Discipline Files. A test of these criterio is that each conclusion in the Results Reports must be based upon information contained within the respective Discipline File and, equally impor-tont, that all documents within the Discipline File have a specific relationship with the octivity involved with completing the respective Action Plan.

B Eoch Discipline Coordinctor is responsible icr ensuring that oppropriate DSAp Working Files are maintained for the scope of work for which tney are responsible. These files will be maintained at the location where the work is g being done or os the Discipline Coordinator may direct. The Discipline Coordinator shall designate personnel who are responsible for file maintenance.

If the work on a given DSAP is being done concurrently at more than one TN-85-6262/14 Page 4 of 9

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE O Number: DAP-14

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: I V RECORDS location, separate files may be maintained. The separate files need not be complete in themselves. Rother, together they form the complete DSAP Working File during the performance of the work. These files will be merged into one Discipline File of the time the Results Report for the DSAP is being prepared.  ;

I Section 4.2 of this procedure presents requirements for the organization of the Discipline Files. Although Section 4.2 is required for Discipline Files, com- i pliance is not required for work in progress (DSAP Working Files). The Discipline l Coordinator may may use Section 4.2 as guidance or may authorize variances with this guidance but shall ensure that the filing system is ultimately compot-ible with the DAP file system os defined by the DAP Manager. As information is produced or collected during the execution of on Action Plan, documents will be oppropriately filed in the Working Files.

In conjunction with the preparation of a given Action Plan Results Report, the cognizont Discipline Coordinator (or designee) shall work witn the DAP Manager' (or his designee) to conform the DSAP Working File with the requirements of this procedure. It is the Discipline Coordinator's responsibility to ensure that the Discipline File contains the required material and is organized in such a manner that the relationship between the information contained in the file and the

! conclusions in the Results Report is clear.

4.2 DAP General File and Discipline Files The following guidance opplies to the development of the DAP General File and the Discipline Files. The DAP General File shall contain the following miminum 1

requirements:

d l

o Personnel qualifications and training records for personnel as required by the Program Plan and DAP Procedures O TN-85-6262/14 Page 5 of 9

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE

Title:

DESlCN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: 1 O Number: DAP-14 RECORDS o Resumes and objectivity statements for personnel as required by the Program Plan and DAP Procedures o DAP Procedures o All revisions of the DAP Collective Evoluotion report submitted to the SRT for review and any comments received from the SRT o DIRs and issues Records os required by DAP 2 o DAP Letters, Action Memos, and Contact Log Sheets o Documentation resulting from audits of the DAP and identified corrective actions os specified in DAP 16 ond DAP 17 o Other documentation determined by the DAP Manager to be generally opplicable to the Design Adequocy Program b

^s o The DAP Monoger may direct that other information be retained in the DAP General File until completion of the DAP Collective Evoluotion. Information not required to support the conclusions of the Collective Evoluotion shall be eliminated from the DAP General File prior to transfer -

to tne CPRT Program Director.

Eoch Discipline File shall contain the following documents (os applicable):

o The respective Action Plan including all opproved revi-sions.

o Discipline Instructions used in the implementation of the DSAP o Records regarding training of personnel in Discipline instructions o Check lists, inspection reports, results of records reviews, and other documentation of the.results of the imple-mentation of procedures O TN 85-6262/14 - Page 6 of 9 l

l l

1

- I l

l COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE O Number: DAP-14

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM RECORDS Revision: 1 l

o Calculations and evoluotions, including evoluotions of root cause, generic implications, and safety significance o All revisions of oction plan results reports submitted to the SRT for review and any comments received from the SRT o Specific references used in performing the evoluotion including controlled documents (or from excerpts) from the CPSES Document Control Center and other docu-ments such as excerpts from reference books, journals, or articles published or unpublished. Any such document retained must have specific relationship to the action plan. For example, if a controlled document is used in the performance of on action plan that has numerous pages or g

sheets, only those pages or sheets octually used should be included.

in assembling the Discipline Files, it is not occeptable to reference CPSES controlled documents. The referenced p pages of the oppropriate revision of the document must be d in the Discipline File. Documents which are contained in the CPRT centrol filet, the DAP General File, or in CPSES generic documes.ts such as the FSAR may be referenced. However, the references must be specific to -

the octual section or page referenced. It is preferable to copy the referenced pages from the sources, clearly mark on the document the source including the date and revi-sion number and include tne excerpts in the Discipline File. Attachment A provides a cover sheet to be used for identifying excerpts from documents.

l Eoch document or group of documents within a completed Discipline File (i.e., at the time of opproval by the SRT) must be identified as to how it was used in tne evoluotion. A cover sheet similar to Attachment B should be used for this purpose. It is not necessary that each document have o separate cover sheet.

Rother, it is suggested that the documents be packaged together by category of use and covered by a single sheet. If the cognizant reviewer is not able to identify how a given document was used in the evoluotion, the document snoll not be ploced in the Discipline File. An exception is that CPRT documents (e.g.,

Action Plans, CPRT Procedures) do not require o cover sheet since their purpose and use are explicitly stated. The DAP Manager may opprove other exceptions.

TN-85-6262/14 Page 7 of 9

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-14

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: I RECORDS 4.3 Transfer of DAP Discipline Files and DAP General File to Program Centrol File Prior to the submittal of a DSAP Results Report to the SRT for final opproval, the oppropriate Discipline File shall be submitted to the CPRT Program Director when opproved by the Review Team Leader. The CPRT Program Director is responsible for a review of the files to oscertain that the files comply with CPRT requirements. This review will be completed and any noted discrepancies corrected or reconciled with the Review Team Leader prior to final SRT opproval of the respective Action Plan Results Report.

The following specifies the requirements that Discipline Files must meet in order to be considered satisfactory:

o The files will be organized in accordance with tne guid-O once provided by Section 5.0 of inis procedure.

o Within each subfile, the documents will be categorized by ~

the function they served. Attachment B (or on alternate opproved by the DAP Monoger) shall be used to identify how each document or group of documents was used in completing the oction plan except as otherwise allowed by this procedure, o Eoch conclusion should be supported by documents con-l toined in the files. This is particularly true for conclu-sions of fact (e.g., o condition is occeptable because the results, os documented in the Dicipline Files, fall within defined bounds, os documented in the Discipline Files).

d Conclusions regarding future action required may no'.

have supporting documentation. However, in those cos;s, the rationale behind c conclusion should be containe.d in the Results Report.

o The revision numbers of controlled documents or excerpts therefrom shall be identified and on indication given as to whether it was the current revision as of the time the Results Report was completed. If a superseded revision of a controlled document is contained in the files, the reason for its use should be given.

' Page 8 of 9 TN-85-6262/14

. COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-14

Title:

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Revision: 1 RECORDS After on Action Plan Results Report has been occepted by the SRT, the respective Discipline Files shall be formally accepted by the CPRT Program Director for retention and distribution as appropriate.

Prior to submittal of the DAP Collective Evoluotion to the SRT for final opproval, the DAP File shall be submitted to the CPRT Program Director when authorized by the Review Team Leader. The CPRT Program Director w!il conduct a review of the DAP File that is similar to the review of the Discipline Files.

5.0 DOCUMENTATION The DAP Monoger shall develop a file index for the DAP General File and p Discipline Files. The DAP General File contains information pertaining to the

\ overall DAP Program correspondence and other generic information. Contract-ual information shall not be placed in any DAP file, ,

The file index should be organized so that each file has a primary file number and optional subfile identifiers. Discipline Files shall have o file prefix, identical j to the respective action plan number. Examples of Discipline File primary and subfile. numbers organized into a file index are shown in Attachment C. Eoch primary or subfile shown on the file index centoins a file content log. Attach-ment D is on example file content log. The file content log contains a sequential number (starting with l} for each file /subfile and a brief description of the item.

Where opplicable, drawing numbers, inspection report numbers, etc., should be used in the file content log to odequately identify the item. The file number and content log sequential number are to be placed on the first page of each document contained in the files.

O TN-85-6262/14 Page 9 of 9

ATTACMAENT A EXAMPLE DOCUMENT EXCERPT COVER 9EET The ottoched is on excerpt from the following document:

Title:

i Document Nwnber:

Revision:

Date of Revision:

Date Obtained From Document Control:

l The above is the latest revision of the controlled document.

The above is not the most recent revision of the controlled document.

However, it is the appropriate revision for analyzing the porticular CPSES feature (s) for which it was used.

Popes or sheet numbers contained in the excerpt:

O TN-85-6262/14 A-1

~

ATTACHMENTB DOCUMENT UliE CODING SPEET ACTION PLAN NUMBER: Applicable Section:

The ottoched document (s) were used in completing the above Action Plan in the following way:

Provided engineering or construction details used in the formulation of inspection plans.

Examples: Controlled drawings, specifications, or procedures Served as re &aily selected samples used to determine the adequacy of the design, construction or conformance to o procedure.

Examples: Construction records, os-built drawings, design documents Provided the basis against which the design or construction was tested.

Examples: Design criterio (FSAR), design specifications, design drowings, design or construction proceoures, codes or standards (ASTM, ACl, IEEE, etc.)

Document the completion of an inspection or test conducted in conformance with the Action Plan.

O Examples: CPRT QA/GC inspection reports, independent testing contracte test records

'~ Document calculations performed as part of the Action Pion to check or verify the adequacy of the design or to check existing CPSES calculations.

Examples: Colculations performed by CPRT personnel i Used to establish the population from which re.is, samples were selected.

Examples: Lists of documents or CPSES elements (conduits, concrete place-ments, pipe hangers, etc.) which comprise the population.

Document the communication among the participants in the action plan.

Examples: Letters, memorando, telephone notes, meeting notes Summarize the results of the inspections and tests conducted in conformance with the Action Plan.  ;

Examples: Lists that correlate data from several sources Provide os-built information onelyzed for conformance with design documents.

Examples: As-built drowings or sketches developed by the CPSES project team, photographs or video tapes Other:

O TN-85-6262/14 B-I

4 ATTACHMENT C EXAMPLE FILE ItCEX FOR DAP DISCPLIE FILE File No. Sub-File No. Description Vill.A.I Qualification and Training of Personnel Vill.A.2 Discipline Instructions Vill.A.3 External / Internal issues - DIRs Vill.A.4 Criteria List / Checklists Vill.A.5 Procedures / Assessments J Vill.A.5a EBASCo Vill.A.5b Impell Vill.A.5c TUGCo Vill.A.5d Gibbs & Hill Vill.A.6 Special Studies / Testing Vill.A.6a EBASCo

, ~

Vill.A.6b impell .

Vill.A.6c ANCo i Vill.A.6d CCL l

Vill.A.6e Gibbs & Hill l

Vill.A.7 Implementation Vill.A.7o EBASCo Vill.A.7b impell Vill.A.7c TUGCo Vill.A.B Summary Evoluotion Vill.A.9 Miscellaneous l

l Vill. A.10 Correspondence l

Vill.A.I I Source Documents l

O TN-85-6262/14 C-l

4 i

ATTACHMENT D EXAMPLE FILE CONTENT LOG FILE CONTENT LOG PREFIX: FILE: SUBFILE:

Log Number Description i I 2

3 4

\ -

!O O

l TN-85-6262/14 D-I

.-_ - _ - _ . - . - - . . - _ _ - _ - - - . . . . - - _ - . . . _ . . - . _ . - - . - _ - --